Clémence
Simon
a,
Cédric
Lion
*a,
Hania
Ahouari
b,
Hervé
Vezin
b,
Simon
Hawkins
a and
Christophe
Biot
*a
aUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8576 – UGSF – Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, 59000 Lille, France. E-mail: cedric.lion@univ-lille.fr; christophe.biot@univ-lille.fr
bUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8516 – LASIRE – Laboratoire de Spectroscopie pour les Interactions, la Réactivité et l’Environnement, 59000 Lille, France
First published on 4th January 2021
Correction for ‘EPR imaging of sinapyl alcohol and its application to the study of plant cell wall lignification’ by Clémence Simon et al., Chem. Commun., 2021, DOI: 10.1039/D0CC05218C.
Table 1: in the heading “τc (s−1)” should read “τc (s)”.
p. 4 – LHS line 16: “are even more immobilized” should be replaced by “reflect immobilized species that are nevertheless more mobile than IIIB”.
p. 4 – LHS line 19: “thereby enabling it to enter into denser and/or smaller cell wall spaces that are less accessible to 3” should be replaced by “than 3”
The sentences starting, p. 4, LHS line 13, should thus read: “Whereas IVA exhibits a mobility very similar to the previously observed IIIA (Azz = 17 G, τc = 2 and 3 ns, respectively), the two other contributors IVB and IVC to the EPR signal reflect immobilized species that are nevertheless more mobile than IIIB (τc = 46 and 87 ns, respectively). It could be hypothesized that the length of the PEG4 spacer arm and its flexibility allows probe 4 to explore a larger environmental pocket around the tagged lignin site than 3.”
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021 |