Hye Jin
Jeong
a,
Sein
Min
b and
Keunhong
Jeong
*a
aDepartment of Chemistry, Korea Military Academy, Seoul 01805, South Korea. E-mail: doas1mind@kma.ac.kr; doas1mind@gmail.com
bDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul Women's University, Seoul 01797, South Korea
First published on 26th November 2020
Correction for ‘Analysis of 1-aminoisoquinoline using the signal amplification by reversible exchange hyperpolarization technique’ by Hye Jin Jeong et al., Analyst, 2020, 145, 6478–6484. DOI: 10.1039/D0AN00967A.
“As a result of polarization transfer, the H-3 proton signal was enhanced 540-fold (0.33%). Moreover, the NMR intensity of H-5, 6, 7, 8 and H-4 protons was enhanced 834- and 986-fold (0.51 and 0.61%), individually (Fig. 3).”
“Our study revealed a 2360-fold amplification of the protons of 1-AIQ following polarization transfer at the Earth's magnetic field.”
The correct expressions are as follows:
“As a result of polarization transfer, the H-3 proton signal was enhanced 0.33%. Moreover, NMR intensity of H-5, 6, 7, 8 and H-4 protons was enhanced 0.51 and 0.61%, individually (Fig. 3).”
“0.48% amplification on average of the protons of 1-AIQ following polarization transfer at the Earth's magnetic field has been reported in our study.”
The authors also note that Fig. 3 is incorrect, the correct figure and caption for Fig. 3 are given below:
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 In the applied magnetic field, 1H NMR enhancement values of 1-AIQ for labelled hydrogens that contained amplification average value. |
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021 |