Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Liquid crystalline copper(I) complexes with bright room temperature phosphorescence

Raquel Giménez *a, Olga Crespo b, Beatriz Diosdado b and Anabel Elduque *b
aInstituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón (ICMA), Departamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza – CSIC, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain. E-mail: raquel.gimenez@ctq.csic.es
bInstituto de Síntesis Química y Catálisis Homogénea (ISQCH), Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza – CSIC, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain

Received 7th February 2020 , Accepted 1st April 2020

First published on 17th April 2020


Abstract

Phosphorescence in the liquid crystal state with one of the highest quantum yield values, 42%, at room temperature is reported. This property is achieved with cyclic trinuclear copper(I) complexes prepared using 3,5-dimethyl-4-(trialkoxyphenyl)pyrazolate ligands. The compounds show well-organized hexagonal columnar mesophases that are stable at room temperature or near room temperature with intracolumnar order at distances of 3.6 Å, red emission and lifetimes consistent with the excimeric metal-centered phosphorescence typical of copper trinuclear pyrazolato complexes. A non-mesogenic analogue shows similar properties, and the single crystal structure is formed by stacked molecules forming a supramolecular extended structure with two different intermolecular Cu⋯Cu contacts, 3.368 Å and 3.666 Å, which are in the range of previously reported weak cuprophilic interactions. The results demonstrate that metallomesogens with efficient room temperature phosphorescence can be obtained with metal complexes other than the widely explored and precious metal-based iridium or platinum complexes.


Introduction

Phosphorescent materials bearing transition metal complexes are intensively investigated for applications in phosphorescent organic light emitting diodes (PhOLEDs).1–3 Theoretically, such materials can emit with 100% internal quantum efficiency due to the possibility of harvesting singlet and triplet excitons, a much higher value than that for fluorescent materials, which only emit through singlet excitons and, therefore, can only reach a theoretical efficiency that is four times smaller. In addition, the large Stokes shift and the long lifetime emission of phosphorescence is advantageous for sensing applications as it avoids interferences from scattered light and short-lived fluorescence.4

In the last two decades, the field of luminescent liquid crystalline metal complexes, a particular class of metallomesogens,5 has developed significantly.6–8 The liquid crystal state offers interesting properties such as the control of the organization and anisotropy combined with better solubility and processing.9 Indeed, a controlled orientation of phosphorescent molecules in active layers has become a crucial topic to improve solid-state emission and efficiency in electronic devices.10 The compounds derived from precious heavy metals such as iridium or platinum are the most widely studied with respect to phosphorescence emission. However, the study of the efficiency (quantum yield) in the liquid crystal phase has been largely overlooked.7 Nowadays, the goal of attaining low temperature liquid crystals with high emission efficiencies in the liquid crystalline state is fostering the search for new molecules.

Copper(I) complexes have not been widely exploited as luminescent materials in the solid state,11 but they have a variety of possible structures and luminescence ranges with great potential.12,13 Furthermore, copper is more abundant and is therefore a more affordable alternative to iridium or platinum complexes. With respect to liquid crystalline properties, very few copper(I) metallomesogens have been described and they show a broad structural diversity and varied ligands derived from tetrathiamacrocycles,14 diiminobipyridine,15 diiminopiridine,16 alkylthiolate,17 terpyridine,18 isocyanide,19–22 bis(pyrazolyl)ethyl ether,23 phenanthroline,24,25 pyrazolate,26 phosphine,27 thiolate,28 benzoylthiourea29 or biquinoline.30 Moreover, the luminescent properties of copper(I) metallomesogens have hardly been analysed26,27,30 and only two studies have reported quantum yield measurements, with the maximum values of up to 2.4% in the columnar phase30 or 8% in the glassy smectic A phase.27

In order to obtain efficient copper-based liquid crystalline emitters our attention was focused on cyclic trinuclear complexes (CTCs) with the general structure of [Cu(μ-pz)]3 (pz = pyrazolate). Copper(I) CTCs show phosphorescence due to emission from a metal-centered triplet state (3MM) of an excimer,31,32 and only very recently has it been reported that very high quantum yields, i.e., over 75%, are affordable in the crystal state at room temperature.33–36 Although the planar structure of the metallacycle could facilitate the formation of columnar liquid crystal phases, liquid crystalline behaviour was not observed for copper(I) CTCs even on using the same ligands as those used for liquid crystalline silver(I) and gold(I) CTCs.34 For example, silver(I) and gold(I) complexes with the 4-hexyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazolate ligand are liquid crystalline, but the copper(I) complex has a lower melting point and exhibits direct transition to the isotropic liquid. This behaviour has been attributed to weaker metallophilic interactions. To our knowledge, there is only one study that has reported about liquid crystallinity in copper(I) CTCs, and this was concerned with complex dendritic pyrazolate ligands. A columnar mesophase was claimed; however, its appearance required an aging process to develop the material without crystallization and the quantum yield value was not measured.26

Based on the above precedents showcasing great potential for research on novel copper(I) phosphorescent metallomesogens we carried out our study with the following aims: (1) to obtain a stable and well-organized liquid crystalline phase for copper(I) CTCs using structurally simple ligands, (2) to stabilize the mesophase at room temperature or near room temperature, and (3) to obtain bright phosphorescence at room temperature in the liquid crystal state. We report here the synthesis and characterisation of these novel compounds (Scheme 1) along with the study of the mesophases and their luminescent properties.


image file: d0tc00642d-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Illustration of the copper complexes described in this work and their synthetic procedure.

Results and discussion

Synthesis and single crystal structure of Cu1

Two copper complexes with a total of nine long alkoxy chains, Cu10 and Cu14, were prepared from 3,5-dimethyl-4-trialkoxyphenylpyrazoles.37 By adapting a synthetic procedure,38 triethylamine was mixed with the pyrazole ligand in acetone and then reacted with [Cu(CH3CN)4]BF4 to yield the trinuclear complex (Scheme 1). Experimental details and characterisation data are provided in the ESI, and the data are consistent with the expected trinuclear stoichoimetry.

An analogous compound with nine methoxy substituents, Cu1, was synthesized under the same reaction conditions. Long colourless needles were obtained by slow diffusion of hexane into a concentrated solution of the compound in dichloromethane at room temperature. Albeit the needles were unstable during manipulation, it was possible to obtain structural information about Cu1·CH2Cl2. Details of data collection and refinement are shown in Table S1 (ESI).

Cu1·CH2Cl2 crystallised in the monoclinic space group P21/n. The unit cell contains four molecules of Cu1 and four molecules of dichloromethane near the peripheral methoxy groups. The crystal structure confirms the trinuclear stoichoimetry of the complex (Fig. 1a and b), which consists of an almost flat metallacycle core formed by the three pyrazolate rings and the three copper atoms. The values of the N–Cu (1.865–1.846 Å) and intramolecular Cu⋯Cu distances (3.185–3.226 Å) are in agreement with those found for reported copper(I) complexes derived from 3,5-dimethylpyrazolates,35,39–41 with N–Cu–N angles close to the ideal linear coordination (177.4–179.8°). All phenyl rings located at the 4-position of the pyrazolate rings do not have the same disposition; one of them is coplanar with the metallacycle whereas the other two are twisted by 40° and 56° (Fig. 1c). This lack of planarity has been previously documented to occur in a variable range of 33–76° but in all these structures the three phenyl substituents were out of plane.42–44


image file: d0tc00642d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Cu1·CH2Cl2 single crystal structure. (a) ORTEP drawing with atom numbering (elipsoids at 50%). (b) Unit cell view along the b axis. (c) Side view of one molecule. (d) Stacking of four molecules in a column with the shortest intermolecular Cu⋯Cu distances indicated in green color.

As far as the crystal packing is concerned, the main structural characteristic of Cu1 is that the molecules are stacked along the b axis (Fig. 1b). The b axis and the normal to the average molecular plane make an angle of ca. 24°, therefore the molecules are tilted inside the stack, with alternating sense in the nearest stacks. Inside each stack the molecules are arranged in a slipped antiparallel fashion. In such a way the pyrazolate ligands spread around the columnar axis. The shortest Cu⋯Cu intermolecular distances measured between closest neighbours alternate between 3.368 Å (Cu(1)⋯Cu(2′)) and 3.666 Å (Cu(1)⋯Cu(3′′)). Based on previous reports that use a re-evaluated van der Waals radius of 1.92 Å,12 these Cu⋯Cu distances lie in the range of weak intermolecular cuprophilic interactions (attractive interactions between closed shell d10 copper(I) atoms), although this assumption is made here without evidence of real attractive interactions. Considering these values, and in similarity to previous reports,41 a supramolecular extended structure is formed along the stack in which each molecule establishes two contacts at distances of 3.368 Å with one neighbour, and two contacts at distances of 3.666 Å with the other neighbour, with one copper atom engaged in two interactions (Fig. 1d).

Liquid crystalline properties

Complexes Cu10 and Cu14 show thermodynamically stable liquid crystal phases. The results obtained from the optical and thermal studies are presented in Table 1 along with the XRD data for the mesophases. Textures observed between crossed polarisers using an optical microscope show focal-conic and dendritic defects that are typical of columnar mesophases (Fig. 2a and b).
Table 1 Characterization data for the liquid crystal phases
Phase transitionaT/°C (ΔH/kJ mol−1) d Miller index Mesophase parameters/Å
a DSC data at 10 °C min−1, onset temperatures, Cr: crystal phase, Colh: hexagonal columnar mesophase, Iso: isotropic liquid. b Distances from the X-ray diffractograms of the mesophases measured on heating at 40 °C for Cu10 and at 55 °C for Cu14.
Cu10 Cr 20 (34.7) Colh 128 (15.4) Iso 29.0 10 Colh
Iso 127 (17.9) Colh 8 (44.8) Cr 16.8 11 a = 33.5
14.5 20 c = 3.6
10.9 21
9.7 30
8.3 22
8.1 31
4.5 (br)
3.6
Cu14 Cr 43 (57.5) Colh 100 (7.1) Iso 33.6 10 Colh
Iso 98 (10.5) Colh 34 (94.0) Cr 19.5 11 a = 38.8
16.7 20 c = 3.6
12.5 21
11.2 30
4.5 (br)
3.6



image file: d0tc00642d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) Microphotograph of the region between crossed polarisers observed for the texture of the Colh phase of Cu10 on cooling the isotropic liquid at 126 °C. (b) The same for Cu14 on cooling the isotropic liquid at 98 °C. (c) DSC thermogram of Cu10. (d) XRD patterns of the Colh phase of Cu10. The arrow indicates the halo corresponding to the stacking distance. (e) Self-assembly in the hexagonal columnar mesophase.

Control of the mesophase stability and temperatures is achieved by varying the length of the alkoxy chains. A chain with a length of 10 carbon atoms stabilises the mesophase over a wider range of temperatures, e.g., Cu10 has a higher clearing point and a lower melting point with respect to Cu14, which means that the mesophase is stable over a range of 108 °C on heating from 20 °C and remains in the mesophase down to 8 °C in the cooling cycle (Fig. 2c).

XRD patterns of the liquid crystal phase show a rich set of sharp reflections in the small angle region, up to seven for Cu10, that are in a ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)](1/√3)[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)](1/√4)[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)](1/√7)[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)](1/√9)[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)](1/√12)[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)](1/√13) and are indexed to a 2D hexagonal lattice (Table 1 and Fig. 2d). This aspect also indicates a long-range correlation of the 2D arrangement of the columns. In the wide-angle region a broad reflection was observed at a distance of around 4.5 Å. This reflection corresponds to the diffuse halo typical of the liquid crystalline state owing to the fluctuations of the molten chains. All this information allowed us to unambiguously assign the liquid crystal phase to a hexagonal columnar mesophase. In addition to the above, an intense and sharp reflection was observed at 3.6 Å and this indicates a periodicity of the molecules within the columns (intracolumnar order) that extends over quite large distances. A similar behavior was observed for Cu14 (Fig. S1, ESI), albeit with larger lattice parameters because of the longer peripheral side chains.

A self-assembly model can be proposed by estimating the number of molecules Z in a columnar stratum of thickness c. The volume of the columnar stratum of thickness c can be calculated from X-ray data to be Vcell = c Scol, where c = 3.6 Å, is the stacking periodicity, and Scol is the columnar cross-section of the hexagonal lattice (Scol = a2 √3/2). The Z value is then obtained from the equation Vcell = Z Vm, where Vm is the molecular volume. Considering a density of 1 g cm−3 in the mesophase, the molecular volume can be calculated as Vm = M/0.6022, where M is the molecular weight. From these equations Z values of 1.0 and 1.08 are obtained for Cu10 and Cu14, respectively.

Therefore, both compounds self-assemble into columns that are arranged in a very well-organized 2D hexagonal network with a single molecule stacked along this column (Fig. 2e). In addition, the stacking distance of c = 3.6 Å along the column could also be compatible with weak intermolecular cuprophilic interactions, similar to those observed in the single crystal structure of Cu1, and this is reflected in the photoluminescence properties (see below).

Photoluminescence properties

The emission properties of the complexes were studied by preparing neat thin films on quartz plates. Both Cu10 and Cu14 showed orange-red coloured emissions at room temperature and the photoluminescence spectra exhibited a broad band centred at around 661–664 nm (Fig. 3 and Fig. S2, ESI). A lifetime of 26–28 microseconds with a monoexponential decay was measured at room temperature. This fact and a large Stokes shift are consistent with phosphorescence (Table 2 and Fig. S3, S4, ESI).
image file: d0tc00642d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Photoluminescence spectrum in the columnar mesophase for Cu10 at 25 °C (excitation wavelength 290 nm), and emission of the film observed under irradiation with a 254 nm handheld lamp (overexposed picture, exact color is given by CIE 1931 color space coordinates in Table 2).
Table 2 Luminescence data of neat thin films
Phase (T/°C) λ em /nm τ/μs QYad/% k r /s−1 k nr /s−1 CIE 1931 (2°) coordinates (x,y)
a Excitation wavelength of 290 nm, excitation spectra collected in Fig. S4 (ESI). b Goodness of fit. c Fitted to the second exponential function. Intensity-averaged lifetime: 〈τ〉 = [B1τ12 + B2τ22]/[B1τ1 + B2τ2]45,46 (see ESI: B1 = 1344.195; τ1 = 6.34 × 10−6; B2 = 3279.177; τ2 = 2.23 × 10−5). d Absolute QY measurement only possible at RT. Standard deviations calculated for Cu1 (1.9), Cu10 (0.8), and Cu14 (0.7). e Calculated radiative constant (kr = QY/τ) and non-radiative constant (knr = (1 − QY)/τ).
Cu10 Colh (25 °C) 661 28 (0.999)b 42 15.0 × 103 20.7 × 103 (0.61, 0.36)
Cu14 Cr (25 °C) 664 26 (0.999)b 14 5.4 × 103 33.1 × 103 (0.60, 0.36)
Cu14 Colh (50 °C) 664 22 (0.999)b
Cu1 Cr (25 °C) 663 21 (0.996)bc 24 11.4 × 103 36.2 × 103 (0.61, 0.36)


It is interesting to note that Cu10 and Cu14 show similar behaviour even though the measurements at room temperature were performed in different phases, the liquid crystal state for Cu10 and the crystal phase for Cu14. To further confirm this similarity, photoluminescence spectrum and lifetime were measured at 50 °C for Cu14, i.e., a temperature at which the compound is in the same liquid crystal state as Cu10. Emission wavelength remained unchanged and only a decrease of the emission intensity as shown in Fig. S5 (ESI), and a slight decrease of lifetime were observed as consequence of the increased temperature (Fig. S3, ESI). Decrease of the emission intensity, as shown in Fig. S5 (ESI) is, of course, not quantitative. As the quantum yield at 50 °C could not be measured, the real effect of temperature in knr may not be discussed, although data could point to a small increment.

Cu1 also shows similar behaviour to the liquid crystalline compounds in color coordinates and emission maxima, albeit with a bi-exponential decay. The decay experiment allows to calculate the intensity averaged lifetime, and this is slightly shorter than for the liquid crystalline compounds. Quenching processes may be not simple and calculated averaged lifetimes (intensity- or amplitude-) and constant kr and knr values must be interpreted with care (Table 2 and Fig. S6, ESI).45,46

The obtained spectra and lifetimes are consistent with an excimer 3MM centred emission of cofacially arranged molecules described for crystalline Cu CTCs,31,32 and in accordance with the self-assembly proposed for the liquid crystal phase and the XRD structure of Cu1. Indeed, the emission spectra of isolated molecules (in dilute THF solutions) are quite different, with only one band in the UV-A region at 356–359 nm (Fig. S7, ESI), which is similar to the emission shown by the 1H-pyrazole precursors.37

For compound Cu10, the emission measured at 25 °C corresponds to the hexagonal columnar mesophase. Remarkably, a high QY value, 42%, was measured in the liquid crystalline state, the highest value reported for a copper metallomesogen, and surpassing the QY values obtained for the scarce number of phosphorescent complexes measured in the liquid crystal phase.7 Notably, this value is also higher than the ones obtained for the crystalline states of Cu14 and Cu1.

The high QY of Cu10 is favoured by a higher radiative constant and a lower non-radiative constant than that of Cu14. The radiative constant value is comparable to previously reported ones for copper(I) pyrazolates.36

Conclusions

A novel luminescent copper(I) metallomesogen that shows phosphorescence in the liquid crystalline state with a quantum yield of 42% at room temperature is reported.

3,5-Dimethyl-4-(trialkoxyphenyl)pyrazolate ligands enable the arrangement of copper(I) CTCs in a well-organized 2D hexagonal network of columns, in which the molecules are stacked with a high degree of intracolumnar order compatible with weak cuprophilic intermolecular interactions. This supramolecular organization of cofacially assembled molecules at distances of 3.6 Å in the liquid crystal phase is capable of providing the red emission derived from excimer-like 3MM transitions.

Within the copper metallacycles, it is possible to control the mesophase temperature ranges by tuning the terminal chain substitution.

These results show that room temperature bright phosphorescent metallomesogens can be attained using earth-abundant non-precious copper complexes, thus widening the prospects for the application of metallomesogens as efficient emissive materials.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the FEDER/MICIU-AEI/projects PGC2018-093761-B-C31 and CTQ2017-83421-P, FEDER/MINECO/project CTQ2016-75816-C2-1-P, and the Gobierno de Aragón/FEDER (research groups E47_17R, E07_17R and E08_17R). The authors acknowledge the use of Servicios Científico-Técnicos of CEQMA (UZ-CSIC). We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).

Notes and references

  1. H. Xu, R. Chen, Q. Sun, W. Lai, Q. Su, W. Huang and X. Liu, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 3259–3302 RSC.
  2. K. Li, G. S. Ming Tong, Q. Wan, G. Cheng, W.-Y. Tong, W.-H. Ang, W.-L. Kwong and C.-M. Che, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, 1653–1673 RSC.
  3. L. Xiao, Z. Chen, B. Qu, J. Luo, S. Kong, Q. Gong and J. Kido, Adv. Mater., 2011, 23, 926–952 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. Q. Zhao, F. Li and C. Huang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 3007–3030 RSC.
  5. D. Pucci and B. Donnio, in Handbook of Liquid Crystals, ed. J. W. Goodby, P. J. Collings, K. Kato, C. Tschierske, H. Gleeson and P. Raynes, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2014, vol. 5, ch. 4, pp. 1–67 Search PubMed.
  6. K. Binnemans, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 448–453 RSC.
  7. X. Wu, M. Zhu, D. W. Bruce, W. Zhu and Y. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2018, 6, 9848–9860 RSC.
  8. Y. Wang, J. Shi, J. Chen, W. Zhu and E. Baranoff, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2015, 3, 7993–8005 RSC.
  9. M. O’Neill and S. M. Kelly, Adv. Mater., 2011, 23, 566–584 CrossRef PubMed.
  10. J. Kim, T. Batagoda, J. Lee, D. Sylvinson, K. Ding, P. J. G. Saris, U. Kaipa, I. W. H. Oswald, M. A. Omary, M. E. Thompson and S. R. Forrest, Adv. Mater., 2019, 1900921 CrossRef PubMed.
  11. V. W.-W. Yam, V. K.-M. Au and S. Y.-L. Leung, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 7589–7728 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. E. Cariati, E. Lucenti, C. Botta, U. Giovanella, D. Marinotto and S. Righetto, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2016, 306, 566–614 CrossRef CAS.
  13. F. Dumur, Org. Electron., 2015, 21, 27–39 CrossRef CAS.
  14. F. Neve, M. Ghedini, A. M. Levelut and O. Francescangeli, Chem. Mater., 1994, 6, 70–76 CrossRef CAS.
  15. A. El-ghayoury, L. Douce, A. Skoulios and R. Ziessel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 2205–2208 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. L. Douce, A. El-ghayoury, R. Ziessel and A. Skoulios, Chem. Commun., 1999, 2033–2034 RSC.
  17. P. Espinet, M. C. Lequerica and J. M. Martín-Alvarez, Chem. – Eur. J., 1999, 5, 1982–1986 CrossRef CAS.
  18. R. Ziessel, L. Douce, A. El-ghayoury, A. Harriman and A. Skoulios, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 1489–1493 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. M. Benouazzane, S. Coco, P. Espinet and J. Barberá, J. Mater. Chem., 2001, 11, 1740–1744 RSC.
  20. M. Benouazzane, S. Coco, P. Espinet and J. Barberá, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 5754–5759 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. S. Coco, C. Cordovilla, B. Donnio, P. Espinet, M. J. García-Casas and D. Guillon, Chem. – Eur. J., 2008, 14, 3544–3552 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. R. Dembinski, P. Espinet, S. Lentijo, M. W. Markowicz, J. M. Martín-Alvarez, A. L. Rheingold, D. J. Schmidt and A. Sniady, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2008, 1565–1572 CrossRef CAS.
  23. H.-D. Lin and C. K. Lai, Dalton Trans., 2001, 2383–2387 RSC.
  24. R. Ziessel, G. Pickaert, F. Camerel, B. Donnio, D. Guillon, M. Cesario and T. Prangé, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 12403–12413 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. E. D. Baranoff, J. Voignier, T. Yasuda, V. Heitz, J. P. Sauvage and T. Kato, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 4680–4683 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. A. Kishimura, T. Yamashita, K. Yamaguchi and T. Aida, Nat. Mater., 2005, 4, 546–549 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. B. Huitorel, Q. Benito, A. Fargues, A. Garcia, T. Gacoin, J. P. Boilot, S. Perruchas and F. Camerel, Chem. Mater., 2016, 28, 8190–8200 CrossRef CAS.
  28. J. Duan, L. Liu, Z. Wu, J. Fang and D. Chen, CrystEngComm, 2018, 20, 4025–4035 RSC.
  29. M. Iliş and V. Cîrcu, J. Chem., 2018, 2018, 7943763 CrossRef.
  30. C. Cretu, A. A. Andelescu, A. Candreva, A. Crispini, E. I. Szerb and M. La Deda, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2018, 6, 10073–10082 RSC.
  31. I. I. Vorontsov, A. Y. Kovalevsky, Y.-S. Chen, T. Graber, M. Gembicky, I. V. Novozhilova, M. A. Omary and P. Coppens, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005, 94, 193003 CrossRef PubMed.
  32. M. A. Omary, M. A. Rawashdeh-Omary, M. W. A. Gonser, O. Elbjeirami, T. Grimes and T. R. Cundari, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 8200–8210 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. R. Galassi, M. M. Ghimire, B. M. Otten, S. Ricci, R. N. McDougald, R. M. Almotawa, D. Alhmoud, J. F. Ivy, A.-M. M. Rawashdeh, V. N. Nesterov, E. W. Reinheimer, L. M. Daniels, A. Burini and M. A. Omary, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2017, 114, E5042 CAS.
  34. J. Cored, O. Crespo, J. L. Serrano, A. Elduque and R. Giménez, Inorg. Chem., 2018, 57, 12632–12640 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  35. Y. Zhang, H. Zhang and J. Xiang, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 2016, 642, 1173–1177 CrossRef CAS.
  36. H. Yang, J. Zheng, S.-K. Peng, X.-W. Zhu, M.-Y. Wan, W. Lu and D. Li, Chem. Commun., 2019, 55, 4635–4638 RSC.
  37. H. Blanco, V. Iguarbe, J. Barberá, J. L. Serrano, A. Elduque and R. Giménez, Chem. – Eur. J., 2016, 22, 4924–4930 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. G. La Monica and G. A. Ardizzoia, Inorg. Synth., 1997, 31, 299–302 Search PubMed.
  39. M. K. Ehlert, S. J. Rettig, A. Storr, R. C. Thompson and J. Trotter, Can. J. Chem., 1990, 68, 1444–1449 CrossRef CAS.
  40. M. K. Ehlert, S. J. Rettig, A. Storr, R. C. Thompson and J. Trotter, Can. J. Chem., 1992, 70, 2161–2173 CrossRef CAS.
  41. H. V. R. Dias, H. V. K. Diyabalanage, M. G. Eldabaja, O. Elbjeirami, M. A. Rawashdeh-Omary and M. A. Omary, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 7489–7501 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  42. Q. Xiao, J. Zheng, M. Li, S.-Z. Zhan, J.-H. Wang and D. Li, Inorg. Chem., 2014, 53, 11604–11615 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  43. F. Gong, Q. Wang, J. Chen, Z. Yang, M. Liu, S. Li, G. Yang, L. Bai, J. Liu and Y. Dong, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 1658–1666 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  44. X.-L. Wang, J. Zheng, M. Li, S. Weng Ng, S. L.-F. Chan and D. Li, Cryst. Growth Des., 2016, 16, 4991–4998 CrossRef CAS.
  45. J. R. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Springer, US, 3rd edn, 2006 Search PubMed.
  46. B. Valeur and M. N. Berberan-Santos, Molecular Fluorescence: Principles and Applications, Wiley-VCH, 2013 Search PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental section and additional Tables and Figures. CCDC 1980455. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/d0tc00642d

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020