Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
Correction: Local synergetic collaboration between Pd and local tetrahedral symmetric Ni oxide enables ultra-high-performance CO2 thermal methanation
Che
Yan
a,
Chia-Hsin
Wang
*b,
Moore
Lin
c,
Dinesh
Bhalothia
a,
Shou-Shiun
Yang
a,
Gang-Jei
Fan
c,
Jia-Lin
Wang
c,
Ting-Shan
Chan
b,
Yao-lin
Wang
d,
Xin
Tu
d,
Sheng
Dai
e,
Kuan-Wen
Wang
f,
Jr-Hau
He
g and
Tsan-Yao
Chen
*ahi
aDepartment of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan. E-mail: chencaeser@gmail.com; Tel: +886-3-5715131#34271
bNational Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, Hsinchu 30076, Taiwan
cDepartment of Chemistry, National Central University, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan
dDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Electronics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GJ, UK
eSchool of Chemistry & Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, P. R. China
fInstitute of Materials Science and Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City 32001, Taiwan
gDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
hInstitute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
iHierarchical Green-Energy Materials (Hi-GEM) Research Centre, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
First published on 11th September 2020
Abstract
Correction for ‘Local synergetic collaboration between Pd and local tetrahedral symmetric Ni oxide enables ultra-high-performance CO2 thermal methanation’ by Che Yan et al., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8, 12744–12756, DOI: 10.1039/D0TA02957B.
The authors regret the following errors in the published article:
In the abstract (page 12744), the term ‘gas chromatography-mass spectrometer’ should instead have read ‘gas chromatography spectrometer’. On page 12745, in the sentence beginning ‘The corresponding mechanisms…’, the term ‘gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS)’ should instead have read ‘gas chromatography spectrometer (GC)’.
The unit ‘mmol’ was used erroneously throughout; all 20 instances of this term in the text should instead have read ‘μmol’. Moreover, on page 12750, in the sentence beginning ‘As for CH4 production…’, the text ‘1905.1 gcatalyst−1’ should instead have read ‘1905.1 μmol gcatalyst−1’.
In Fig. 3, the unit ‘mmol’ on the y-axis labels should instead have read ‘μmol’; a corrected version of the figure is provided below. Furthermore, in the Fig. 3 caption, the phrase ‘pure ambient CO’ should instead have read ‘pure ambient CO2’.
 | ||
| Fig. 3 The gas chromatography (GC) determined CO2RR results for the NiOTPd-T and control samples (NiOT-T and Pd-T) for (a) CO and (b) CH4 production yield in pure ambient CO2. Results for CO and CH4 production yield in reaction gas (CO2 + 3H2) are respectively demonstrated in (c) and (d). The regions marked by pink rectangles e and f are respectively shown in (e) and (f) for clarity. The GC measurements are conducted under a pressure of near 1 atm from 323 K to 573 K and the concentration is normalized by loading of catalysts (μmol gcatalyst−1). | ||
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 |