Xiao
Xiao
a,
Guangxun
Zhang
a,
Yuxia
Xu
a,
Hualin
Zhang
a,
Xiaotian
Guo
a,
Yong
Liu
b and
Huan
Pang
*a
aSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangling College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu, P. R. China. E-mail: huanpangchem@hotmail.com
bCollaborative Innovation Center of Nonferrous Metals of Henan Province, The Key Laboratory of Henan Province on Nonferrous Metallic Materials Science and Fabrication Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China
First published on 2nd July 2020
Correction for ‘A new strategy for the controllable growth of MOF@PBA architectures’ by Xiao Xiao et al., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 17266–17271, DOI: 10.1039/C9TA05409J.
Furthermore, the authors want to clarify the correct details of three figures in the Electronic Supplementary Information of the published article.
In the originally published version of our Electronic Supplementary Information, the details of Fig. S13 were incorrect. When processing the XRD data, we misarranged the order of M10 and M11, resulting in errors. A corrected version of Fig. S13 is provided here:
Fig. S13. XRD patterns of the NiCo-MOF@PBA.
In addition, the vertical axis label of Fig. S20 should be “Potential (V versus RHE)”. A corrected version of Fig. S20 is provided here:
Fig. S20. Polarization curve derived Tafel plots of the Ni-MIL-77.
Finally, the vertical axis label of Fig. S24 should be “Current density−1 (mA−1 cm2)”. A corrected version of Fig. S24 is provided here:
Fig. S24. Polarization curve derived Tafel plots of the Ni-MIL-77.
These corrections will not affect the experimental conclusions.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 |