Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Tunable electrical properties of carbon dot doped photo-responsive azobenzene–clay nanocomposites

Jahnabi Gogoi, Shubham Shishodia and Devasish Chowdhury*
Material Nanochemistry Laboratory, Physical Sciences Division, Institute of Advanced Study in Science and Technology, Paschim Boragaon, Garchuk, Guwahati, 781035, India. E-mail: devasish@iasst.gov.in; Fax: +91 361 2279909; Tel: +91 361 2912073

Received 28th August 2020 , Accepted 28th September 2020

First published on 12th October 2020


Abstract

The development of photo-responsive nanocomposite materials is important in the fabrication of optoelectronic devices. In this work, we fabricated a carbon dot doped azobenzene–clay nanocomposite which possesses different ac conductivity with and without UV treatment. At first, azobenzene nanoclusters were synthesised and then successfully used to make an azobenzene–clay nanocomposite. It was observed that there is a small change in the ac conductivity of the azobenzene–clay nanocomposite with and without UV treatment. However, this change in ac photoconductivity can be enhanced in the azobenzene–clay nanocomposite by doping with electron-rich cysteine and methionine carbon dots. Hence, ac conductivity properties of the carbon-doped azobenzene–clay nanocomposite can be tuned using UV light. Impedance measurements were determined using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Mechanistic insight into the phenomenon is also discussed in the paper. Thus fabrication of tunable carbon dot doped photo-responsive azobenzene–clay nanocomposites will lead to the use of carbon dot doped azobenzene–clay nanocomposites in photo-switchable optoelectronic devices.


Introduction

There is a need to study the photophysical properties of new photosensitive materials so that these materials can be used as photoswitches and thus expand their use for applications in biology, materials science, and beyond. Photo-switchable molecules have the advantages of transformation into different states in different light conditions, stability in states and fast response which imparts a wide range of properties to these molecules.1 And these advantages in the light-driven molecular transformations have consequently found their applications in photoswitches,2 optical storage,3 photodetectors,4 phototransistors,5 telecommunications,6 photorefractive,7 electro optics,8 to name a few. Of the many photochromic or photosensitive molecules, azobenzene is extensively used in hybrid composition with various other materials for their use in energy-related applications.

Azobenzene is one of the well-known organic photosensitive molecules which can isomerise into trans and cis form based on the irradiation conditions. It has two phenyl rings which are separated by an azo bond (–N[double bond, length as m-dash]N–).9 Both these states are obtained under different conditions of light, which means it isomerises into trans to cis form under UV illumination and from cis to trans form under visible light.10 The reversibility of the isomerised states is facilitated by the azo bond as this conjugated system show strong electronic absorption.11 And as such, the electronic tunability around this conjugated system can be tuned to operate differently under UV light and visible light. Both these forms are different in their stability as the trans form is more stable thermodynamically than its cis form. Also, they differ in their planarity with the trans form assuming a planar form with C2h symmetry and the cis form assuming a non-planar form with C2 symmetry.12 As such, the photo-responsive azobenzene has been used in incorporation with polymeric materials,13,14 different nanostructured materials15,16 and metal–organic frameworks17–19 for energy storage applications.

The additional advantageous property of organic molecules facilitates variation in doping which is in turn facilitated by the molecular transformations in the presence of light. Azobenzene belonging to this category of organic molecules also have been used for similar purposes with modulated doping and dopant behaviour. The most favourable way to control the properties of the nanoscale materials is through doping.20 Doping of carbon nanomaterials with heteroatoms causes a change in their tunable properties.21 Incorporation of dopants in semiconductor nanostructured materials causes a change in their electronic structure, leading to changes in the optical and electrical behaviour of the materials, eventually making them suitable for such applications.22 With wide-ranged properties of conductivity, carbon nanomaterials like graphene and carbon nanotubes are used in composition with azobenzene for various such applications. Not much work has been done in this area, but with the photo-switchable behaviour and the flexible property of doping, they have been used to form a hybrid composite with carbon nanomaterials. Peimyoo et al. showed the doping behaviour of the two isomerised forms of azobenzene on graphene using Raman Spectroscopy. Further, they studied the modulated doping behaviour under controlled light conditions, and it showed that the conformation changes with the doping affect the electronic properties of graphene.23 In another work, Kim et al. showed non-covalent latching of azobenzene to graphene, and reversible photo-switchable behaviour of azobenzene led to light-controlled conductance modulation as well as modulated doping which attributed to the formation of improved light-gated transistors.24 Zhang et al. on the other hand showed that the rapidly reversible isomerisation of the azobenzene under irradiation and its hybrid with graphene oxide having an internal short-ranged order led to its application as a highly sensitive photoswitch.25 In the efforts to store clean, renewable solar energy in reversible molecular bonds, Kolpak et al. showed the usage of an azobenzene functionalised with carbon nanotubes with a volumetric density of Li-ion batteries for the construction of a novel recyclable, thermally stable solar fuel cell.26 Chen et al. in their work investigated for the first time the electrochemical behaviour of hybrid composite reversible self-assembled graphene with azobenzene modified by surfactant and showed the light-induced polarity change electrochemical behaviour of the hybrids.27 Owing to the conducting property of graphene and carbon nanotubes, Simmons et al. demonstrated the change in the conductivity of the carbon nanotubes in composite with azobenzene owing to the photoisomerisation behaviour of the azobenzene molecule.28 Light-driven reversible isomerisation property of the azobenzene molecule had been used for the composition of photo controlled reversible conducting devices made of polymer and MWCNT hybrid composites with azobenzene.29

All of the reports show the use of nanostructures in hybrid composition with azobenzene, where the photoisomerisation behaviour of azobenzene facilitates doping as well as conductance change in graphene and the nanotubes. Also, all of these works shows the use of azobenzene molecule or functionalised azobenzene. Deka et al. in their work synthesized an azobenzene nanocluster retaining the photoisomerisation behaviour and this in composition with graphene and functionalised graphene showed the formation of a p-type and n-type nanocluster and its use as in electronic device.30 Herein, we have also made an azobenzene cluster in composition with clay, which has a structural similarity with graphene and methionine and cysteine nanoparticles as dopants for modulation of the conducting properties of the system.

In this work, we have successfully synthesized a nanocluster from commercially available azobenzene through a simple hydrothermal method as per already established protocol by Deka et al.30 The azobenzene nanocluster (AZONC) shows green fluorescence under UV light and is easily dispersed in aqueous media. The AZONC was further utilised to prepare azobenzene nanocluster–clay nanocomposite (AZONC/BTN). The AZONC was used in the nanocomposite to impart the photosensitized property of AZONC. There are various reports on the hybrid composition of azobenzene and graphene achieved by doping the graphene with azobenzene for use in different light-driven applications. To enhance the photo-tuning of the electrical properties, we doped the azobenzene nanocluster–clay nanocomposite (AZONC/BTN) with electron-rich species of methionine and cysteine nanoparticles. It was observed that the ac conductivity properties of doped nanocomposite could be tuned using UV light. Thus fabrication of tunable nanocomposite will lead to the development of photo-switchable devices.

Experimental section

Chemicals used

Azobenzene (98%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and sodium hydroxide pellets (Merck, India) were used while synthesising the azobenzene nanocluster. Bentonite clay (BTN) used in the synthesis of the nanocomposite was purchased from Sigma Aldrich, India. All the chemicals were used as obtained without further purification. The water used in all the experiments was from Milli-Q water purification system.

Characterisation

The prepared nanocomposites were characterised using the UV-visible spectroscopy on a Shimadzu 2600 UV-vis spectrophotometer to study the changes in absorbance of the nanocomposites and the starting materials. Fluorescence spectra were collected on a Jasco Spectrofluorometer (FP-8300). Fourier transform infrared studies were done using a Nicolet-6700 FTIR spectrophotometer. Particle size and zeta potential measurements were carried out using a Malvern Zetasizer Nanoseries, Nano-ZS90. Sonicator from Hwashin Technology was used for the sonication of samples. Furthermore, the impedance measurements were done using an electrochemical workstation CH instrument 660E.

Methodology

Synthesising azobenzene nanocluster (AZONC)

Following the bottom-up synthesis approach, 1 g of azobenzene was taken in a beaker and melted. To this molten azobenzene, 20 ml of 0.1 M aqueous NaOH solution was poured. The mixture was sonicated for 30 min and then filtered. The filtrate was collected in a beaker and then it was centrifuged to obtain the azobenzene nanocluster dispersion in water.

Preparation of AZONC–clay nanocomposite (AZONC/BTN)

The nanocomposite was obtained by dispersing 0.3 g of bentonite (BTN) clay in 20 ml of as-synthesised azobenzene nanocluster. The mixture was then sonicated in a bath sonicator for 24 hours. Sonication was done here for exfoliating the dispersed BTN clay. After sonication, the obtained solution was then further mixed by using a Spinix shaker for 20 minutes. The sonicated and well-dispersed solution obtained from the above method was then collected for further characterisation.

Synthesising methionine carbon dots (CD-Meth)

1 g of L-methionine was taken in a beaker and heated at 280 °C for melting. The L-methionine turned black. To this, 30 ml of NaOH (10 mg ml−1) was added. The solution mixture was sonicated for half an hour, it was filtered, and then the filtrate was centrifuged for 20 min at 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 rpm to obtain the methionine nanoparticles dispersed in water.

Preparation of AZONC–methionine–clay nanocomposite (AZONC/Meth/BTN)

1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]2 ratio of AZONC and methionine carbon dot was mixed with 0.04 g of bentonite clay, and the mixture is kept for sonication for 24 hours. After sonication, the obtained solution was then further mixed by using a Spinix shaker for 20 minutes. The sonicated and well-dispersed solution obtained from the above method was then collected.

Synthesising cysteine carbon dots (CD-Cys)

1 g of L-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate was taken in a beaker and heated at 240 °C for melting. The white powdery substance slowly turned to a brown sticky liquid (melt). To this hot mix, 30 ml of NaOH (10 mg ml−1) was added. The solution mixture was then sonicated, filtered and the filtrate was centrifuged at 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 rpm for 20 min to obtain the cysteine nanoparticles dispersed in water.

Preparation of AZONC–cysteine–clay nanocomposite (AZONC/Cys/BTN)

AZONC and cysteine carbon dot was mixed in the 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 ratio. To this mixture, 0.04 g of clay was added, andthe mixture was kept for sonication for 24 hours. After sonication, the obtained solution was then further mixed by using a Spinix shaker for 20 minutes. The sonicated and well-dispersed solution obtained from the above method was then collected.

Deposition of nanocomposite on silicon wafer

By adopting the drop-cast method; we deposited the as-synthesised nanocomposite on a silicon wafer and kept it in an oven to dry for 12 hours. The resultant drop cast silicon wafer was then further characterised for potential electrical and photocatalytic applications. Before deposition, the silicon wafer was rinsed in 0.1 M HCl solution.

Results and discussion

In this work, a tunable electrical property of photosensitised nanocomposite demonstrated. Scheme 1 depicts the schematics of the protocol applied to fabricate a tunable doped photosensitised nanocomposite. At first azobenzene nanoclusters (AZONC) were prepared from azobenzene by the method developed and reported by our laboratory.30 Further, the azobenzene nanoclusters were immobilised on clay to form azobenzene–clay nanocomposite (AZONC/BTN). The prepared azobenzene–clay nanocomposite (AZONC/BTN) demonstrated photosensitised property. It was observed that UV treated azobenzene–clay nanocomposite (AZONC/BTN) when drop cast on silicon wafer surface show lower ac conductivity than non-treated azobenzene–clay nanocomposite. However, the difference in the ac conductivity of UV treated and non-treated azobenzene–clay nanocomposite can be further enhanced with doping with methionine or cysteine carbon dots to form azobenzene–methionine–clay (AZONC/Meth/BTN) or azobenzene–cysteine–clay nanocomposite (AZONC/Cys/BTN). The ac conductivity measurements of the different azobenzene–clay nanocomposite were determined by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS). Thus through doping tunable electrical property can be achieved of the photosensitized azobenzene–clay nanocomposite.
image file: d0ra07386e-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Schematic representation of the protocol adopted for the preparation of the azobenzene–clay composites and their electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies.

First azobenzene nanocluster (AZONC) was prepared as given in the experimental section. AZONC show fluorescence when viewed under UV light. Fig. 1S(A) in ESI shows that photograph of AZONC in normal light and UV light. The AZONC show greenish fluorescence in UV. The dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurement show that the size of the AZONC ∼ 2 nm (Fig. 1S(B) in ESI). The photoluminescence (PL) properties of AZONC was also studied before and after UV treatment. The stacked PL spectra of azobenzene nanocluster, as shown in Fig. 1S(C) in is obtained after exciting the nanocluster in the wavelength range of 300–410 nm. Initially, on excitation, the fluorescence intensity decreases but with further excitation, it increases to give the maximum emission at 450 nm at an excitation wavelength of 410 nm. The PL intensity is excitation dependent, and with a gradual increase in the excitation wavelength, the emission wavelength also shifts. The change in PL intensity is in accordance as per the earlier reports of carbon nanomaterials.31 Similarly, the stacked PL spectra for the azobenzene nanocluster after exposer to UV light was also obtained (Fig. 1S(D)). From the PL spectra, we observe that it follows the same trend as before. With the increase in excitation wavelength, there is first gradual decrease and then increase in the fluorescence intensity to give the maximum emission at 410 nm.

The carbon dots were then prepared from methionine and cysteine using the already established protocol developed by our laboratory. In this work methionine and cysteine was used as a doping agent to fabricate AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN nanocomposite. The stacked PL spectra for methionine and cysteine carbon dots were also obtained and is shown in the ESI Fig. 2S(A) and (B). Both the methionine and cysteine carbon dots also shows excitation dependent fluorescence intensity. On excitation, the fluorescence intensity initially increases to reach the emission maximum at the excitation wavelength of 340 nm. On a further increase of the excitation wavelength, the intensity gradually decreases. The stacked PL spectra were obtained after excitation of the carbon dots in the wavelength range of 300–400 nm. Cysteine carbon dots were also characterised using photoluminescence spectroscopy in the wavelength range of 300–430 nm. Here also, the carbon dots show excitation dependent PL intensity. The fluorescence intensity gradually increases with the increase in the excitation wavelength to obtain the maximum emission at the excitation wavelength of 410 nm. After that, with further increase in the excitation wavelength, the intensity decreases. The excitation dependent PL properties in carbon nanomaterials may arise due to surface defects, quantum confinement effects and defects in symmetry, and the exact mechanism operating behind these properties have not yet been understood.

The various azobenzene–clay nanocomposite prepared were subjected to different characterisation techniques like UV-vis Spectroscopy, Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Photoluminescence Spectroscopy. Fig. 1 shows the UV-visible spectra of different azobenzene–clay nanocomposite viz. AZONC, AZONC/BTN, AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN in a stacked form under two different conditions of normal light and UV light illumination. Fig. 1(A) shows the UV-visible spectra of the AZONC in the presence of the UV light and absence of the UV light. In the spectra, we observe a sharp peak at 244 nm for AZONC and a slightly shifted peak at 250 nm for the AZONC system when illuminated with UV light. These peaks can be attributed to the π–π* transition due to the presence of –C[double bond, length as m-dash]C– bond in the nanocluster. A broad peak at 325 nm has been observed for the AZONC possibly for n–π* transition that indicates the presence of the –N[double bond, length as m-dash]N– bond in the azonanocluster.30 However, AZONC/BTN does not show any change in the UV-visible spectrum when AZONC/BTN is exposed to UV (Fig. 1(B)). However, the peak looks very different when compared with AZONC.


image file: d0ra07386e-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Stacked UV-vis spectra of (A) azonanocluster (AZONC) with and without UV illumination, (B) composite of azonanocluster with clay (AZONC/BTN) with and without UV illumination, (C) methionine (Meth) and the composite of methionine with azonanocluster and clay with and without UV illumination and (D) cysteine (Cys) and composite of cysteine with azonanocluster and clay with and without UV illumination.

It is observed from the spectrum that only one broad peak exist at about 250 nm. The characteristic absorbance peak for bentonite clay (BTN) observed at 248 nm, and disappearance of the peaks of the AZONC and appearance of broad peak proves the presence of an interaction between the AZONC and BTN and suggests the formation of a nanocomposite. Fig. 1(C) and (D) show the UV-visible spectrum of AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN, respectively, with and without UV irradiation. Also stacked and compared with UV-visible spectrum of Meth and Cys NPs. We observe a broad low-intensity peak at around 270 nm in AZONC/Meth/BTN, which might be due to n–σ* transition, which indicates the presence of –OH group in the compound. Similarly, FTIR analysis was carried out on all different azo–clay nanocomposite prepared. Fig. 2 shows the stacked FTIR spectra of the starting material azo nanocluster (AZONC), AZONC/BTN, methionine (Meth), cysteine (Cys) and their corresponding nanocomposite, i.e. AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN. From the FTIR Spectroscopy, few peaks that could be recognised are 3624 cm−1 for AZONC and AZONC/BTN nanocomposite, a broad peak at 3414 cm−1 for AZONC/Meth/BTN and a peak at 3436 cm−1 for AZONC/Cys/BTN. All the peaks correspond to O–H stretching. Similarly, the peak of AZONC found in 1443 cm−1 is due to the N[double bond, length as m-dash]N stretching vibration.


image file: d0ra07386e-f2.tif
Fig. 2 The stacked FTIR spectra of azobenzene nanocluster (AZONC), azobenzene nanocluster with clay (AZONC/BTN), methionine (Meth), azobenzene nanocluster and clay composite with methionine (AZONC/Meth/BTN), cysteine (Cys) and azobenzene nanocluster and clay composite with cysteine (AZONC/Cys/BTN).

This peak was slighted shifted at 1428 cm−1 for AZONC/BTN, at 1465 cm−1 for AZONC/Meth/BTN and at 1473 cm−1 for AZONC/Cys/BTN which indicates some interaction of N[double bond, length as m-dash]N of AZONC after the formation of AZONC/BTN or AZONC/Meth/BTN or AZONC/Cys/BTN nanocomposite. The FTIR spectrum of BTN is provided in ESI Fig. 3S. Apart from the similarity of the peaks of the hybrid composites with those of the corresponding peaks of clay (BTN) and AZONC/BTN, the nanocomposites prepared with doped methionine and cysteine nanoparticles also retain the characteristic peaks of methionine and cysteine nanoparticles respectively. The peak at 1577 cm−1 for methionine nanoparticles is also observed at a slightly shifted position of 1590 cm−1 for the AZONC/Meth/BTN composite system which might be due to the –N–H– bending vibration of the amino acid system. Similar peak position was also observed at 1625 cm−1 for cysteine nanoparticles and a shifted peak at 1587 cm−1 for its corresponding nanocomposite AZONC/Cys/BTN. The –OH stretching frequency around 3369 cm−1 for methionine and 3446 cm−1 for cysteine respectively are also retained in the nanocomposites with a slight change in the peak positions present at 3414 cm−1 for AZONC/Meth/BTN and to 3436 cm−1 for AZONC/Cys/BTN nanocomposite. FTIR of BTN also taken and shown in ESI Fig. 3S. It can be observed that the peak at 3449 cm−1 corresponding to the presence of O–H depicting that BTN is rich in –OH functionality.

The surface morphology of AZONC/BTN, AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN was studied using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Fig. 3(A)–(C) shows the representative SEM images of AZONC/BTN, AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN, respectively. The images clearly show the surface morphology. However, no nanoparticle is visible on the surface of the nanocomposite, which indicates that doped nanoparticles are embedded in the nanocomposite. The nanoparticles in the composite can be seen in the representative transmission electron microscope images. Fig. 3(D) shows the visible clustered azobenzene in its nano form. Similarly, carbon dots of methionine and cysteine can also be seen in the carbon dot doped systems AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN (Fig. 3(E) and (F)).


image file: d0ra07386e-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Scanning electron microscope image of (A) AZONC/BTN, (B) AZONC/Meth/BTN and (C) AZONC/Cys/BTN; transmission electron microscope of (D) AZONC/BTN, (E) AZONC/Meth/BTN and (F) AZONC/Cys/BTN.

Band-gap energy

The optical band gaps of different azobenzene nanocomposite were estimated using empirical formula
 
(αhν)2 = A(Eg) (1)
where A is a constant that depends on the transition probability, Eg is the optical band gap energy, h is the Plank constant and ν is the frequency. The Eg of different azobenzene nanocomposite were calculated by extrapolating a straight line to the (αhν)2 = 0 axis in the plots of the (αhν)2 versus optical band gap energy. Assuming that the transition probability was 1, the equation could be simplified as
 
(αhν)2 = Eg (2)

The Tauc plot for determining the energy gap of AZONC/BTN is shown in Fig. 4S. The energy gap of AZONC/BTN is determined to be 4.08 eV. Similarly, Tauc plot was drawn for AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN. Fig. 5S(A) and (B) in ESI shows that Tauc plot for AZONC/Meth/BTN in the presence of normal light and after treatment with UV light respectively. From the plot, the energy gap was determined to be 3.82 eV, and with UV treatment drops to 3.76 eV. Fig. 5S(C) and (D) in ESI shows that Tauc plot for AZONC/Cys/BTN in the presence of normal light and after treatment with UV light respectively. From the plot,the energy gap was determined to be 3.91 eV,and with UV treatment drops to 3.81 eV.

Conductivity studies

The prepared nanocomposite systems were then tested for their electrical conductivities using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) under two different conditions of normal light and the UV light of 365 nm. The illumination was carried out using a UV lamp (JSGW, India). EIS requires to perform by sweeping through a wide range of frequencies at a single perturbation amplitude. EIS uses small perturbations rather small potential sweeps and steps in case of other electrochemical measurements such as cyclic voltammetry or chronoamperometry. Since we have used a photosensitised material azobenzene nanocluster as the starting material in preparing the nanocomposites and this photosensitised material behaves differently under the different conditions of normal light and UV light. Moreover, the photo-switchable property of the azobenzene has also retained in azobenzene nanocluster so, the photo-switchable property of the azobenzene in different nanocomposite systems has been explored by studying its response to an applied voltage at a particularly perturbed amplitude in a wide range of frequencies.

In the first study, the electrochemical impedance curves of the azobenzene–clay nanocomposite was observed at a different frequency range of 1 Hz to 105 Hz and an amplitude of 0.005 V as a part of a two-electrode system to standardise the system. Fig. 6S in ESI shows the response of the azobenzene–clay nanocomposite with clay at a range of input voltage from ±1 V to ±0.001 V. Fig. 6S(A) shows the response of the hybrid system at different voltages under ordinary room conditions. Fig. 6S(B) shows the response of the same composite system at different voltages under the UV illumination. It can be observed that under UV illumination, the nanocomposite does not show much difference in their conducting behaviour as compared to that of the composite behaviour under normal light conditions. However, the only change that we observe from the graph is that, with increasing input voltage, the resistivity of the system decreases and thus, a change in conductivity is observed. Hence, the further ac conductivity measurements were noted in the particular input voltage of 1 V. The comparative plot of log[thin space (1/6-em)]Z vs. log[thin space (1/6-em)]f at an amplitude of 0.005 and input voltage of 1 V is shown in ESI Fig. 7S. It shows that change in ac impedance; hence the conductivity behaviour is not vastly different under normal light and UV light condition. It needs to be mentioned here that log[thin space (1/6-em)]Z vs. log[thin space (1/6-em)]f as measured in ac impedance studies is a measure of the change in impedance (Z) with frequency. The decrease in log[thin space (1/6-em)]Z vs. log[thin space (1/6-em)]f plot in a system signifies decrease of impedance and hence increase in ac conductivity of the system.

Further, EIS measurement was carried out on doped nanocomposite, i.e. AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN. Fig. 4 shows log[thin space (1/6-em)]Z vs. log[thin space (1/6-em)]f of AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN in normal light as well as after UV illumination. It is evident from Fig. 4(A) and (B) there is observed visible change in the conducting properties of the nanocomposite after doping with electron-rich moiety Meth CDs and Cys CDs. Here we observe that under the application of UV light, the resistivity of the AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN nanocomposite system decreases and thus, the conductivity of the systems increases. These doped nanocomposite systems of AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN were subjected to time varied EIS study under UV illumination to see the response of the composites at different time variations. Fig. 8S(A) and (B) in ESI shows the response of the composite systems through the plot of log[thin space (1/6-em)]Z vs. log[thin space (1/6-em)]f under similar conditions of amplitude and input voltage. The only variation is time. The change in ac impedance study was conducted at the time variations of 5 min, 10 min, 15 min and 20 min of UV illumination. The AZONC/Meth/BTN composite system had approximately the same response irrespective of the time of UV illumination. However, in the case of AZONC/Cys/BTN, the system had slightly different conductance behaviour with illumination time. The variation is maximum at 20 min, so EIS measurement of carbon dot doped system was taken at 20 min.


image file: d0ra07386e-f4.tif
Fig. 4 log[thin space (1/6-em)]Z versus log[thin space (1/6-em)]f plot of (A) AZONC/Meth/BTN with and without UV treatment (B) AZONC/Cys/BTN with and without UV treatment and (C) comparative plot of (A) and (B).

Fig. 4(C) gives us a comparative insight into both AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN nanocomposite system. The comparative plot demonstrates that methionine doped nanocomposite system has higher conductivity than the cysteine doped composite system under similar conditions (UV treatment). The comparative plot demonstrates that photoswitching of conductivity of AZONC/BTN can be enhanced by doping with Meth NPs and Cys NPs. All the measurements were carried out in amplitude 0.005 and input voltage at 1 V.The photo-switchable property observed in AZONC/Meth/BTN, and AZONC/Cys/BTN nanocomposite is due to the presence of photosensitized material AZONC. The statement is justified by the fact that methionine–clay and cysteine–clay nanocomposite does not show any change in ac conductivity under similar condition. Fig. 5 shows the log[thin space (1/6-em)]Z vs. log[thin space (1/6-em)]f plot of methionine–clay nanocomposite under normal light and UV illumination. The plot clearly shows that there is no change is ac conductivity under two different condition. This proves the importance of azobenzene as a photo-switchable material in the fabrication of such nanocomposite. In this work, we have used a photosensitising molecule that responds to light and have shown the effect of doping with an electron rich system and therefore the change in conductivity of the nanocomposite system owing to the light controlled changes in the photosensitiser molecule alone. Reports in literature show the use of similar photosensitiser molecules in a nanocomposite system with different systems such as graphene, multiwalled carbon nanotubes, polymeric systems.23–29 Also there are reports of nanocomposite systems that comprises of polymeric films incorporating different nanoparticles which have shown change in conductance properties (ac and dc) of the nanocomposite system.32,33 But the changes in the conductivity of those systems are in accordance with the increase and decrease of wt% of the nanoparticles into the systems with an already conducting polymeric material. In case of the nanocomposite systems of graphene, single walled carbon nanotube, multiwalled carbon nanotube, polymers that used a photosensitiser molecule similar to the one that we have used, azobenzene, all of the reports suggest change in the conductance properties of the systems owing to the interaction of the azobenzene with an already conducting system such as graphene and carbon nanotubes. But in our work we have used the photosensitising molecule to dope with electron rich species and have further seen the conductance switching of the nanocomposite owing to the interaction of the photosensitiser molecule with the dopants under visible and UV light conditions. Given below is a comparative table of nanocomposite systems that have been discussed in literature that shows switching of conductance behaviour in different conditions (Table 1).


image file: d0ra07386e-f5.tif
Fig. 5 log[thin space (1/6-em)]Z versus log[thin space (1/6-em)]f plot of methionine–clay nanocomposite with and without UV treatment.

image file: d0ra07386e-f6.tif
Fig. 6 (A) Energy level diagram of AZONC/BTN, AZONC/Meth/BTN, AZONC/Cys/BTN with and without UV treatment. (B) Schematic representation of possible interaction of cis and trans-AZONC with Meth and Cys CDs.
Table 1 Comparative nanocomposites systems in literature with tunable electrical conductivity behaviour
Nanocomposite system Doping Conductance behaviour Importance Reference
Azobenzene–graphene system Methyl orange doped on graphene Photocontrolled Use of graphene as a molecular transformation probe 23
Azobenzene–graphene system Azobenzene Photocontrolled High levels of doping with reversible doping in graphene 24
DR1 functionalised single walled carbon nano tube Anthracene Photocontrolled Successful noncovalent functionalisation of nanotube transistors 28
MWCNT–polymer nanocomposites Azobenzene embedded in PMMA Photocontrolled Photoswitching with stable amplitude 29
Polyaniline–NiO nanocomposites NiO nanoparticles Wt% of nanoparticles Composition based tunable conductivity 32
Dopamine–polypyrrole nanostructures None DA–Ppy mole ratios Composition based applications of the nanocomposites 33
Azobenzene–clay nanocomposite Methionine and cysteine CD'S Photocontrolled Light controlled Present work
Tunable conductivity of azobenzene in nanoform with variation in the dopant


Mechanistic insight into the phenomena

We tried to understand the mechanism behind the enhanced ac conductivity of doped azobenzene–clay nanocomposite. It is well known that the trans form of azobenzene exists in a planar form, and its cis form exists in the non-planar arrangement. Similarly, in its nanocluster form also, we have shown earlier that azobenzene retains its planarity in trans form and non-planarity in cis form. In other words, azobenzene nanoclusters inherit the photo-isomerisation property.24 We had shown earlier that azobenzene immobilised in graphene oxide sheet, trans-azobenzene nanocluster over these graphene-based systems stacking is taking place between the two parallel aromatic ring system, p orbital overlap is maximum. Hence there is more delocalisation of the electrons. As a result, there is increased conductivity in case of trans-GO AZONC. On the other hand, upon the photoisomerisation to the non-planar cis form, the p-orbital overlap decreases, and so does the conductivity.

Here unlike graphene oxide, clay although planar does not have an aromatic ring-based system. So, the different photo-isomerised form of AZONC immobilised in the clay system, the planarity and orientation do not have a substantial effect on the conductivity properties of the system under different isomerisation conditions. However, it is observed that there is a considerable change in the conductivity under normal light and UV light upon doping with methionine (Meth CDs) and cysteine carbon dot (Cys CDs.) The change in conductivity is because azobenzene nanocluster and doped Meth CDs and Cys CDs have substantial interaction. The two phenyl rings of azobenzene with a –N[double bond, length as m-dash]N– bond has delocalised π electrons as well as non-bonding electrons. These π electrons and non-bonding electrons interact with those of the methionine and cysteine. This interaction between the two systems is facilitated more in the cis state of the azobenzene molecule, and hence after UV treatment, the conductivity of that system increases. Also, we know that the length of the conjugation system determines the extent of delocalisation and as the conjugation increases, the energy gap between the valence band and the conduction band also decreases resulting in better flow of electrons between the two systems. As such, the conductivity of the system is also larger. Methionine with a longer parent carbon chain is assumed to have a more extensive conjugated system than cysteine. Furthermore, as such the delocalisation of electrons in the azobenzene clay methionine system is more than azobenzene clay cysteine system. Hence the better conductivity results in the former case upon reversible photo-controlled condition (Fig. 6).

Conclusion

In summary, photo-responsive material like azobenzene was used to fabricate UV responsive photoconductive nanocomposite. First, azobenzene nanoclusters were synthesised, followed by azobenzene–clay nanocomposite. It was observed that there is a small change in ac conductivity of azobenzene–clay nanocomposite with and without UV treatment.

However, this change in ac photoconductivity can be distinctly enhanced in azobenzene–clay nanocomposite by doping with cysteine and methionine carbon dots. Hence, ac conductivity properties of carbon-doped azobenzene–clay nanocomposite can be tuned using UV light. The bandgap calculation also indicates that ac conductivity of cysteine and methionine carbon dots azobenzene–clay nanocomposite: AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN, decrease when treated with UV. The impedance measurements were determined using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. The photo-responsive behaviour observed by carbon dot doped azobenzene clay nanocomposite was due to the presence of azobenzene nanoclusters. This is confirmed as carbon dot doped clay nanocomposite did not show photo-conductive behaviour. The two phenyl rings of azobenzene with a –N[double bond, length as m-dash]N– bond has delocalised π electrons as well as non-bonding electrons has strong interaction with electrons of the methionine and cysteine. This interaction between the two systems is facilitated more in the cis state of the azobenzene molecule. Hence the doped AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN nanocomposite after UV treatment show lower and enhanced ac conductivity. Thus, tunable carbon dot doped photo-responsive azobenzene–clay nanocomposites are potential material for its application in photo-switchable optoelectronic devices.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

JG wants to thank IASST for fellowship. The authors thank the Central Instrumentation Facility (CIF) of IASST for instrumentation facility.

Notes and references

  1. B. Y. Choi, S. J. Kahng, S. Kim, H. Kim, H. W. Kim, Y. J. Song, J. Ihm and Y. Kuk, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 96, 156106 CrossRef.
  2. M. Del Valle, R. Gutierrez, C. Tejedor and G. Cuniberti, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2007, 2, 176–179 CrossRef CAS.
  3. A. R. Yuvaraj, Md. L. Rahman and M. M. Yusoff, Int. J. Spectrosc., 2016, 1–9 Search PubMed.
  4. X. Zhou, T. Zifer, B. M. Wong, K. L. Krafcik, F. Leonard and A. L. Vance, Nano Lett., 2009, 9, 1028–1033 CrossRef.
  5. N. Guo, L. Xiao, F. Gong, M. Luo, F. Wang, Y. Jia, H. Chang, J. Liu, Q. Li, Y. Wu, Y. Wang, C. Shan, Y. Xu, P. Zhou and W. Hu, Adv. Sci., 2019, 1901637,  DOI:10.1002/advs.201901637.
  6. D. Zhou, R. Piron, M. Dontabactouny, O. Dehaese, F. Grillot, T. Batte, K. Tavernier, J. Even and S. Loualiche, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2009, 94, 081107 CrossRef.
  7. K. Meerholz, B. L. Volodin, Sandalphon, B. Kippelen and N. Peyghambarian, Nature, 1994, 371, 497–500 CrossRef CAS.
  8. M. Lee, H. E. Katz, C. Erben, D. M. Gill, P. Gopalan, J. D. Heber and D. J. Mcgee, Science, 2002, 298, 1401–1403 CrossRef CAS.
  9. A. A. Beharry and G. A. Woolley, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 4422–4437 RSC.
  10. O. Sadovski, A. A. Beharry, F. Zhang and G. A. Woolley, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 1484–1486 CrossRef CAS.
  11. C. J. Barrett, J. Mamiya, K. G. Yagerc and T. Ikeda, Soft Matter, 2007, 3, 1249–1261 RSC.
  12. M. Bockmann, N. L. Doltsinis and D. Marx, Phys. Rev. E, 2008, 78, 036101 CrossRef.
  13. E. Blasco, B. V. K. J. Schmidt, C. Barner-Kowollik, M. Pinol and L. Oriol, Macromolecules, 2014, 47, 3693–3700 CrossRef CAS.
  14. F. D. Jochum, L. Z. Borg, P. J. Roth and P. Theato, Macromolecules, 2009, 42, 7854–7862 CrossRef CAS.
  15. D. Samanta, J. Gemen, Z. Chu, Y. Diskin-Posner, L. J. W. Shimon and R. Klajn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2018, 115, 9379–9384 CrossRef CAS.
  16. C. L. Jones, A. J. Tansell and T. L. Easun, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 6714–6723 RSC.
  17. R. Lyndon, K. Konstas, B. P. Ladewig, P. D. Southon, P. C. J. Kepert and M. R. Hill, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 3695–3698 CrossRef CAS.
  18. Y. Zhu and W. Zhang, Chem. Sci., 2014, 5, 4957–4961 RSC.
  19. G. Das, T. Prakasam, M. A. Addicoat, S. K. Sharma, F. Ravaux, R. Mathew, M. Baias, R. Jagannathan, M. A. Olson and A. Trabolsi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 19078–19087 CrossRef CAS.
  20. D. Mocatta, G. Cohen, J. Schattner, O. Millo, E. Rabani and U. Banin, Science, 2011, 332, 77–81 CrossRef CAS.
  21. M. K. Barman, B. Jana, S. Bhattacharyya and A. Patra, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 20034–20041 CrossRef CAS.
  22. X. Dong, D. Fu, W. Fang, Y. Shi, P. Chen and L. J. Li, Small, 2009, 5, 1422–1426 CrossRef CAS.
  23. N. Peimyoo, J. Li, J. Shang, X. Shen, C. Qui, L. Xie, W. Huang and T. Yu, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 8878–8886 CrossRef CAS.
  24. M. Kim, N. S. Safron, C. Huang, M. S. Arnold and P. Gopalan, Nano Lett., 2012, 12, 182–187 CrossRef CAS.
  25. X. Zhang, Y. Feng, P. Lv, Y. Shen and W. Feng, Langmuir, 2010, 26, 18508–18511 CrossRef CAS.
  26. A. M. Kolpak and J. C. Grossman, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 3156–3162 CrossRef CAS.
  27. S. Chen, L. Bao, E. Ou, C. Peng, W. Wang and W. Xu, Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 19673–19686 RSC.
  28. J. M. Simmons, I. In, V. E. Campbell, T. J. Mark, F. Leonard, P. Gopalan and M. A. Eriksson, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 98, 086802 CrossRef CAS.
  29. S. W. Basuki, V. Schneider, T. Strunskus, M. Elbahri and F. Faupel, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 11257–11262 CrossRef CAS.
  30. M. J. Deka, S. K. Sahoo and D. Chowdhury, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2019, 372, 131–139 CrossRef CAS.
  31. B. Li, Y. Guo, A. Iqbal, Y. Dong, W. Li, W. Liua, W. Qin and Y. Wang, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 107263–107269 RSC.
  32. H. S. Roya, M. M. Islama, M. Y. A. Mollahband and M. A. B. Hasan Susana, Mater. Today, 2019, 15, 380–387 Search PubMed.
  33. W. Zhang, Y. Zhou, K. Feng, J. Trinidad, A. Yu and B. Zhao, Adv. Electron. Mater., 2015, 1, 1500205 CrossRef.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: DLS size of AZONC, stacked PL spectra of azonanocluster with and without UV light, stacked PL spectra of methionine and cysteine nanoparticle, FTIR spectra of clay (BTN), Tauc plot, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy of azonanocluster clay composite with and without UV at different input voltage, log[thin space (1/6-em)]Z versus log[thin space (1/6-em)]f plot of AZONC/Meth/BTN and AZONC/Cys/BTN with UV treatment at different response time. See DOI: 10.1039/d0ra07386e

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020