Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Ultrafine Co3O4 nanolayer-shelled CoWP nanowire array: a bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting

Lili Zhang ab, Tingting Zhangb, Kaiqing Daia, Liqing Zhaoa, Qinghe Weia, Bing Zhanga and Xu Xiang*b
aSchool of Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, P. R. China
bState Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 15 Beisanhuan East Road, Beijing 100029, PR China. E-mail: xiangxu@mail.buct.edu.cn

Received 8th July 2020 , Accepted 22nd July 2020

First published on 11th August 2020


Abstract

The development of bifunctional electrocatalysts based on highly efficient non-noble metals is pivotal for overall water splitting. Here, a composite electrode of Co3O4@CoWP is synthesized, where an ultrathin layer composed of Co3O4 nanoparticles is grown on CoWP nanowires supported on a carbon cloth (CC). The Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode exhibits excellent electrocatalytic activity and improved kinetics towards both the oxygen and hydrogen evolution reactions (OER and HER). The Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode achieves a current density of 10 mA cm−2 at a low overpotential of 269 mV for the OER and −10 mA cm−2 at 118 mV for the HER in 1.0 M KOH solution. The voltage applied to a two-electrode water electrolyzer for overall water splitting, while employing the Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode as both an anode and a cathode, in order to reach a current density of 10 mA cm−2, is 1.61 V, which is better than that for the majority of reported non-noble electrocatalysts. Moreover, the Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode exhibits good stability over 24 h with slight attenuation. The electrode benefits from the enhanced adsorption of oxygen intermediates on Co3O4 during the OER, the increased ability for water dissociation and the optimized H adsorption/desorption ability of CoWP nanowires during the HER. This study provides a feasible approach for cost-effective and high-performance non-noble metal bifunctional catalysts for overall water electrolysis.


Introduction

Hydrogen has become a convenient and inevitable alternative for new energy consumption in recent years, due to its environmental friendliness, sustainability, and superior gravimetric energy density.1 Among the various hydrogen production technologies, the effective utilization of electrocatalytic water splitting is expected to provide a viable method for ‘clean’ hydrogen production.2,3 It is generally believed that the overall electrocatalytic water splitting process consists of two half-reactions of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER).4 The efficiency and kinetics of both these reactions rely strongly on the electrocatalysts used.5 It has been demonstrated in many studies that the noble metal Pt and noble metal oxides (IrO2 and RuO2) can achieve significantly higher electrocatalytic activities for HER and OER, respectively. The high cost, low storage, and single-functionality of these noble metal-based electrocatalysts strongly hinder their widespread applications.6–8 Thus, the rational design and exploitation of cost-efficient and electroactive transition metal-based catalysts with bifunctionality is highly attractive for overall water splitting.

Transition metal phosphides (TMPs, M = W, Ni, Co, Mo, Fe, and Cu) have been reported as efficient catalysts for the HER due to their high electrical conductivity, metalloid characteristics, and good electrocatalytic activities.9–15 Furthermore, the phosphorus element in TMPs not only has the ability to trap protons, but it also exhibits good affinity to the reaction intermediates, thus facilitating the HER reaction dynamics.16 However, while TMPs generally exhibit excellent electrochemical performances in acidic electrolytes, they perform poorly in alkaline electrolytes.9,17 Electrolytic hydrogen evolution in alkaline electrolytes has been carried out successfully for many years and high-purity hydrogen (approximately 100%) can be obtained with moderate energy consumption. Therefore, considering the practical applications, it appears to be more urgent to explore high-efficiency TMP catalysts for HER in alkaline media. It has been found that the HER activities of TMPs in alkaline conditions can be improved by doping with an additional metal to tune their crystal and electronic structures.16 For example, NiCoP,16 FeCoP, CoMoP, WCoP, and CoFeP18–21 have been confirmed to show better HER activities than the corresponding single-metal phosphides in alkaline electrolytes. The heterogeneous metal-doping of TMPs can effectively lower the energy barrier of H adsorption, facilitate electron transfer, and provide abundant active sites, thus significantly improving HER catalytic performance in alkaline electrolytes.22

Even though transition metal-doped TMPs display excellent HER performance, their unsatisfactory OER performance greatly hinders their practical application for overall water splitting. Some studies have indicated that the integration of inexpensive and efficient OER and HER catalysts into a compatible hybrid is a viable route for obtaining an excellent bifunctional catalyst for electrochemical water splitting.23,24 The modified electronic structure, the synergistic effect between the two components, and the interfacial defective sites in the hybrid give rise to improved properties. The spinel structure of Co3O4 can be considered to be a promising electrocatalyst for the OER in alkaline media, because of its high redox activity, abundant resources and low price.25,26 Moreover, Co3O4 also shows good electrocatalytic performance towards the HER.27 Thus, it is reasonable to expect that the hybrid TMPs/Co3O4 catalyst will be an efficient and practical bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting.

Taking the aforementioned concepts into account, and with the aim of constructing efficient bifunctional catalysts for overall water splitting, cobalt-doped tungsten phosphide (CoWP) nanowires self-supported on carbon cloth (CC) with an ultrathin layer of Co3O4 nanoparticles as the shell (named Co3O4@CoWP/CC) were designed and prepared by a hydrothermal method involving phosphidation and annealing, and they served as efficient free-standing bifunctional electrocatalysts for water electrolysis. The results showed that the CoWP nanowire array can effectively prevent the Co3O4 nanoparticles from agglomerating and that the Co3O4 ultrafine nanoparticles are distributed evenly on the nanowire. Benefiting from the peculiar structure of Co3O4@CoWP/CC and the synergy between Co3O4 and CoWP, the designed Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode showcases impressive electrocatalytic properties for both OER and HER with small overpotentials of 269 and 118 mV needed to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm−2 in 1.0 M KOH, respectively. The fabricated Co3O4@CoWP/CC‖Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrolyzer only requires a low cell voltage of 1.61 V to drive the overall water splitting process to generate a current density of 10 mA cm−2.

Experimental

Materials

Commercial Pt/C (5 wt%), cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO3)2·6H2O, 99%), sodium tungstate dehydrate (Na2WO4·2H2O, 99%), sodium hypophosphite (NaH2PO2, 99%), ruthenium dioxide (RuO2, 99%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37 wt%), potassium hydroxide (KOH, 85%) and oxalic acid (H2C2O4, 99%) were purchased from Aladdin Ltd (China). Carbon cloth (WOS1009) was obtained from Taiwan CeTech Co., Ltd. Ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4, 99%) and cyclohexane (98%) were purchased from Kermel Co., Ltd. Octadecylamine (ODA, 97%) was obtained from Macklin Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.

Synthesis of CoWP/CC

The cobalt and tungsten oxide nanowires on carbon cloth (CoWO/CC) were synthesized by a simple hydrothermal procedure according to previous studies.15 Typically, Na2WO4·2H2O (12.5 mmol) was dissolved in deionized water (100 mL), and a 3.0 M HCl aqueous solution was subsequently slowly dropped into the solution until it reached a pH value of 1.2, forming a yellowish transparent solution. Then, H2C2O4 (35 mmol) was added into the above solution and diluted to 250 mL, resulting in the H2WO4 precursor. Next, the H2WO4 precursor solution (70 mL), (NH4)2SO4 (3.5 g) and Co(NO3)2·6H2O (0.35 g) were mixed in a Teflon-lined autoclave (100 mL), and the mixture was stirred to obtain a homogeneous solution. Subsequently, a piece of carbon cloth (2 × 3 cm2) that was ultrasonically cleaned by acetone, alcohol, and deionized water in succession, was placed into the autoclave, and then the hydrothermal process took place under 180 °C for 16 h. The CoWO/CC precursor was cleaned with deionized water and dried at 60 °C. Finally, the precursor was phosphatized using NaH2PO2 at 300 °C for 3 h under an inert atmosphere, and the product of CoWP/CC was obtained.

Synthesis of Co3O4@CoWP/CC

The modification of Co3O4 nanoparticles on CoWP/CC was carried out through the following steps.28 Briefly, ethanol (30 mL) was mixed with Co(NO3)2·6H2O (1.5 mmol) in a beaker to form a red solution. Subsequently, octadecenylamine (2 mL) with ethanol (10 mL) were added under stirring, obtaining a green solution. Next, the as-prepared mixture and CoWP/CC were transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave (50 mL) and were kept at 180 °C for 12 h. The obtained product of Co3O4@CoWP/CC was rinsed with cyclohexane and ethanol repeatedly, and dried at 60 °C. The resulting hybrid was calcinated in air at 350 °C for 3 h. The sample loading amounts of CoWP/CC and Co3O4@CoWP/CC were determined by a microbalance to be 7.8 and 8.1 mg cm−2, respectively. For comparison, the Co3O4 powder was obtained by the same hydrothermal process, but without CC. The powder of 8.1 mg cm−2 was post-coated on CC (denoted as Co3O4/CC).

Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 Advance, scan range of 3–80°) analysis was used to determine the crystal structures of the samples. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was carried out with an Escalab 250Xi electron spectrometer using MgKα radiation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using an Ultra 55Zeiss field emission scanning electron microscope. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and high angle annular dark field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) results were obtained using a FEI Talos F200S emission scanning electron microscope, in order to determine the micro-structures of the fabricated composites. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms were obtained using a Quantachrome Autosorb iQ-MP-C. Specific surface areas were tested using Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) models. Pore-size distributions were evaluated using Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) methods.

Electrochemical measurements

The electrochemical measurements were obtained using an electrochemical workstation (CHI660E, CH Instrument) with a standard three-electrode system and 1.0 M KOH solution as the electrolyte. The Hg/HgO electrode, the as-prepared electrode (1 × 1 cm2 geometric area), and the graphite electrode were used as the reference, working, and counter electrodes, respectively. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed for 20 cycles at a scan rate of 10 mV s−1. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) measurements were performed in a N2-saturated electrolyte at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1. The measured potentials were calculated as the potential versus the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) using the equation, Evs. RHE = Evs. Hg/HgO + 0.059 pH + 0.098. The Tafel slopes were calculated from the LSV polarization curves. For comparison, commercial Pt/C or RuO2 powders (3 mg) were mixed with a 5 wt% Nafion solution (50 μL), dispersed in ethanol (450 μL) and then sonicated to form a uniform solution. They were then loaded onto bare CC (1 × 1 cm2) to form the working electrodes. The electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) were obtained over a frequency range of 0.01–105 Hz. Double-layer capacitance (Cdl) data was calculated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves between −0.7 to −0.9 V at an increasing sweep rate from 10 to 200 mV s−1. Electrochemical stability measurements were examined by chronopotentiometry curves at the current density of 10 mA cm−2 for over 24 h. All measurements were corrected with 85% iR compensation.

Results and discussion

The Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode was prepared in three steps, namely hydrothermal synthesis, phosphidation, and self-assembly processes, as described in Scheme 1. Firstly, cobalt-doped tungsten oxide (CoWO) was precipitated and adhered on a CC surface to form vertically aligned brown-red nanowire arrays of CoWO/CC by hydrothermal treatment. Secondly, the CoWO nanowires were converted to dark blue CoWP nanowires through low-temperature gas-phase phosphidation. The CoWP/CC nanowires could be employed as the support skeleton for the uniform growth and anchoring of an ultrathin layer composed of ultrasmall Co3O4 nanoparticles. Finally, cobalt hydroxide precursors were deposited on the surface of the CoWP nanowires by a hydrothermal process, and the ultrathin layer composed of Co3O4 nanoparticles was further anchored onto the CoWP/CC nanowires after annealing. The color of the obtained sample turned from dark blue to black, indicating that the cobalt hydroxide had been transformed into Co3O4 nanoparticles. The hybrid catalyst with its unique three-dimensional (3-D) hierarchical architecture can facilitate the exposure of catalytic active sites, thereby enhancing the mass/electron mobility and accelerating the diffusion of gaseous products during water electrolysis.
image file: d0ra05950a-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Illustration of the synthetic route for the Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode.

XRD was used to confirm the phase structures of Co3O4@CoWP/CC (Fig. 1a), CoWP/CC, and Co3O4 (Fig. S1a and b). The diffraction peaks at 36.8°, 44.8°, and 55.7° could be indexed to the typical (311), (400), and (422) crystal facets of spinel Co3O4 (JCPDS no. 42-1467), respectively.29 In addition, the other main diffraction peaks match well the peaks of orthorhombic WP (JCPDS no. 29-1364),30 however the main diffraction peak of the (103) plane at 2θ = 46.5° shows a slight positive shift (∼0.4°) compared to the standard peak, and this is due to the incorporation of Co atoms into the WP lattice.31 The XRD results verified the coexistence of Co3O4 and CoWP and the formation of the Co3O4@CoWP nanohybrid.


image file: d0ra05950a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) XRD patterns of the Co3O4@CoWP/CC nanohybrid. (b) XPS survey spectrum of Co3O4@CoWP/CC and the corresponding high-resolution XPS spectra for (c) P 2p, (d) W 4f, (e) Co 2p, and (f) O 1s.

XPS was utilized to characterize the elemental valence of Co3O4@CoWP/CC, CoWP/CC (Fig. S1c–f), and Co3O4 (Fig. S2a and b). The survey spectrum in Fig. 1b shows the co-presence of the W, Co, P, and O elements, and the atomic percentages of W, Co, and P of Co3O4@CoWP/CC are approximately 4.98%, 1.97%, and 0.96%, respectively. However, the survey spectrum of CoWP/CC (Fig. S1c) displays a weaker Co 2p peak intensity and has a low Co atomic ratio (∼0.8%) for CoWP/CC, confirming the presence of the Co-dopant in CoWP, and this is consistent with the XRD pattern results. The spectrum of the P 2p region in Fig. 1c contains two main peaks. One main peak at 130.0 eV is deconvolved into two peaks including P 2p1/2 (130.7 eV) and P 2p3/2 (129.8 eV). The phosphorus species with binding energy at 129.8 eV can be ascribed to the P–W bonds. The other main signal of 134.0 eV can be assigned to the oxidized phosphorus species (P–O) that appears due to surface oxidation.9 In the W 4f region (Fig. 1d), there are two typical peaks at 37.9 and 35.8 eV that can be associated with W 4f7/2 and W 4f5/2, respectively. The W 4f7/2 peak at 37.9 eV can be assigned to the W6+ species, e.g. WO3, and the W 4f5/2 peak is attributed to Wδ+ in CoWP.32 It can be observed from Fig. 1e that the peaks of Co 2p1/2 and Co 2p3/2 are located at approximately 797.5 and 781.5 eV, respectively. The two peaks centered at approximately 787.5 and 804.5 eV are satellite peaks.33 The Co 2p1/2 and Co 2p3/2 peaks are fitted with two spin orbit doublets, indicating the co-presence of Co2+ and Co3+. Additionally, the peaks of Co 2p1/2 and Co 2p3/2 in Co3O4@CoWP show a slight positive shift compared to those of pure-Co3O4 (Fig. S2a), implying tight integration and strong interaction between Co3O4 and CoWP.34 As observed from Fig. 1f, Co3O4@CoWP/CC shows two oxygen peaks in the O 1s spectra. In particular, the characteristic peak at 532.5 eV is quite conspicuous, and originates from the hydroxyl species.26 The other peak at 531.0 eV can be assigned to oxygen vacancies or defects of cobalt oxide that are favorable for improved OER performance.35 These XPS test results further confirm the preparation of the Co3O4@CoWP target product on carbon cloth.

The morphology of the prepared product was further observed by SEM. As shown in Fig. 2a–c, the CoWP nanowires with a regular array structure densely and uniformly cover the entire surface of the carbon cloth. This array structure of the CoWP nanowires does not change and remains perfect in contrast to unphosphorized CoWO/CC, shown in Fig. S3. The CoWP nanowires were measured to be approximately 1 μm long. The average diameter of the nanowires is 40 nm with a smooth surface and sharp tips, and the diameter decreases gradually from the fixed end to the tip (Fig. 2b and c). When the Co3O4 nanoparticles are loaded onto the surface of the CoWP nanowires, the Co3O4@CoWP nanowires maintain a perfectly aligned structure, as seen in Fig. 2d–f. The high-magnification SEM image in Fig. 2f shows the increased diameter and rough surface of the Co3O4@CoWP nanowires compared with that of CoWP/CC, implying that the ultrathin layer composed of Co3O4 nanoparticles is compactly and uniformly anchored onto the exterior surface of the CoWP nanowires. The 3-D Co3O4@CoWP nanowire array structure formed on the CC can enlarge the effective surface area for the electrochemical reactions and can facilitate the diffusion of electrolyte between accessible nanowires.


image file: d0ra05950a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 SEM images of (a–c) the CoWP/CC nanowire array, and (d–f) the Co3O4@CoWP/CC nanowire array with different magnifications.

To obtain more detailed information on its structure and composition, Co3O4@CoWP was scraped from the carbon cloth and characterized by TEM. The low-magnification image indicates that the length of the Co3O4@CoWP nanowires is approximately 1 μm, as shown in Fig. 3a. After the ultrathin layer composed of Co3O4 nanoparticles was deposited on the surface of the CoWP nanowires, as shown in Fig. 3b, the Co3O4@CoWP nanowires become rougher than the CoWP nanowires (Fig. S4). Fig. 3c implies that the ultrathin layer that is composed of Co3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) is solidly decorated on the CoWP nanowires. The ultrathin layer is about 5 nm thick and consists of uniformly dispersed Co3O4 particles. The lattice fringes of CoWP and Co3O4 are clearly shown in the HRTEM images presented in Fig. 3d. The lattice spacing of 0.202 nm of CoWP is slightly larger than that of 0.195 nm of WP in the (103) plane (JCPDS no. 29-1364), and this can be attributed to Co-doping into the crystal lattice of WP.36,37 The interplanar distances of 0.244 nm are clearly observed, and can be ascribed to the (311) plane of spinel Co3O4. These results further verify that the ultrathin layer composed of Co3O4 nanoparticles was successfully decorated on the CoWP nanowires, and that the dispersed Co3O4 nanoparticles can provide sufficient active sites for the electrochemical reactions.38


image file: d0ra05950a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a and b) TEM images, (c and d) HRTEM images, and (e and f) HAADF-STEM images with its corresponding element mapping images of Co3O4@CoWP/CC.

The EDS results indicate the coexistence of O, Co, P, and W elements in the Co3O4@CoWP hybrid, and that these elements are distributed uniformly on the whole nanowire (Fig. 3e and f), which is consistent with the XPS results. Moreover, the EDS spectrum of CoWP also displays the presence of Co, P, and W elements (Fig. S5). The BET surface areas of Co3O4@CoWP/CC and CoWP/CC are 11.80 and 10.85 m2 g−1 (Fig. S6a), respectively, demonstrating that the presence of an ultrafine Co3O4 nanolayer on CoWP nanowires can appropriately increase the surface area of Co3O4@CoWP. The pore-size distribution is mainly found in the 2–7 nm range, as shown in Fig. S6b, implying mesoporous characteristics of the Co3O4@CoWP/CC nanohybrid, and the abundance of mesopores in the structure is beneficial for exposing innumerable catalytically active sites.

The electrocatalytic properties for the OER of the Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode were evaluated using the conventional three-electrode configuration. For comparison, LSV curves of CC-supported CoWP, Co3O4, and commercially available RuO2 were obtained under the same conditions. As illustrated in Fig. 4a, the Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode displays good electrocatalytic OER ability with an overpotential (η10) of 269 mV at the current density of 10 mA cm−2, and this is clearly lower than those of CoWP/CC (311 mV) and Co3O4/CC (327 mV) and is only slightly higher than that of RuO2 (211 mV). As the highly dispersed Co3O4 nanoparticles are modified on the surface of the CoWP nanowires, Co atoms can effectively provide more active reaction sites for hydroxyl adsorption, so the OER performance is significantly improved.39


image file: d0ra05950a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 OER performances of the catalysts in alkaline media. (a) Polarization curves of Co3O4@CoWP/CC, CoWP/CC, and Co3O4/CC. (b) Tafel slopes and (c) EIS curves of the electrocatalysts at an overpotential of 10 mV. (d) Calculated electrochemical Cdl values for the corresponding electrocatalysts. (e) Polarization curves of Co3O4@CoWP/CC before (initial) and after 1000 cycling tests. (f) Chronopotentiometric measurement of Co3O4@CoWP/CC for 24 h at 10 mA cm−2.

The Tafel slope is an important metric to evaluate electrocatalyst performance, and a smaller Tafel slope usually means that the electrocatalyst needs a lower overpotential to gain the identical current density. Accordingly, the Tafel slopes of Co3O4@CoWP/CC, CoWP/CC, Co3O4/CC, and bare CC for the OER were obtained and were 69, 82, 90, and 106 mV dec−1 (Fig. 4b), respectively, demonstrating the faster OER reaction kinetics and accelerated electron transfer transport ability on the Co3O4@CoWP composite interface.38

EIS was implemented to investigate the kinetics of mass transport and the conductivity of the electrodes. Nyquist plots for Co3O4@CoWP/CC, CoWP/CC, and Co3O4/CC were obtained through equivalent fitting, as shown in Fig. 4c, in which the Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode had the smallest charge transfer resistance (Rct) among the tested samples. Benefiting from the synergy between the highly ordered array of CoWP nanowires and the uniformly dispersed Co3O4 fine nanoparticles, the charge transfer resistance between CoWP and Co3O4 is reduced.40

Moreover, the electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) is necessary evidence to explore the difference in the natural electrocatalytic activity. According to the reported method, the CV results obtained at different scan rates (Fig. S7) were used to calculate Cdl.41 As can be seen from Fig. 4d, the Cdl values of Co3O4/CC, CoWP/CC, and Co3O4@CoWP/CC are 17.8, 45.2, and 77.2 mF cm−2, respectively. The Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode has the largest Cdl value, indicating its highest effective electrochemically active area with abundant active sites exposed for the OER.42

The Co3O4 nanoparticles are mainly responsible for the effective electrocatalysis of water oxidation, while CoWP/CC provides a conductive structural support for electron transport and generates catalytic synergy. The possible cobalt oxide-catalyzed reactions can generally be expressed as eqn (1) and (2).

 
Co3O4 + H2O + OH → 3CoOOH + e (1)
 
CoOOH + OH → CoO2 + H2O + e (2)

In this process, the reaction of CoOOH with CoO2 is the rate-determining step, and Co(IV) is considered to be the active species of the OER. In addition, OH reacts with CoO2 to generate adsorbed H2O2. Then, H2O2 decomposes to produce the HOO species that subsequently reacts with OH, leading to the formation of H2O and O2, accompanied by the release of an electron.43,44

Since stability and durability are important factors that must be considered in practical applications, long-term CV scanning was performed in an alkaline environment. After 1000 cycling tests, the polarization curve for Co3O4@CoWP/CC showed negligible change for the OER overpotential relative to the initial curve (Fig. 4e), indicating that the Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode has superior stability in long-term electrocatalytic processes. The chronopotentiometry measurement was also performed for more than 24 h, as shown in Fig. 4f. The electrocatalytic activity decreased slightly after continuous operation, further elucidating the superb durability of the catalyst. This result revealed that the integration of the catalytic active component (Co3O4 nanoparticles) with the conductive and robust substrate (CoWP/CC) can generate a synergistic effect for the OER, resulting in high ionic/electric conductivity, excellent chemical/mechanical stability, and rapid mass-transport.

The HER activity was tested in alkaline media at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1. The measured LSV curves of different electrocatalysts are summarized in Fig. 5a. The Co3O4@CoWP/CC nanohybrid electrode exhibits improved HER performance with η10 of 118 mV, and this exceeds most tungsten-based catalysts under alkaline conditions. For comparison, in order to achieve identical current density, CoWP/CC, Co3O4/CC, and commercial Pt/C require overpotentials of 269, 460, and 51 mV, respectively. Compared with pure-CoWP and pure-Co3O4, Co partial substitution for W in WP and the interface between Co3O4 and CoWP may introduce P defects in Co3O4@CoWP.45 The existence of P defects is conducive to H2O dissociation, and thus improves the HER activity in an alkaline environment. At the same time, the energy barrier for H2 production also decreases by Co-doping. Thus, both water dissociation and hydrogen release are significantly accelerated on Co-WP.46,47 Tafel slopes in Fig. 5b show the reaction kinetics information of the as-synthesized catalyst. The Tafel slopes of Co3O4@CoWP/CC, CoWP/CC, Co3O4/CC, and bare CC for HER are 58, 94, 177, and 194 mV dec−1, respectively. The lowest value for the Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode proves that the catalytic HER process of the target nanohybrid follows the Volmer–Heyrovsky mechanism.48 Highly dispersed Co3O4 ultrafine nanoparticles with numerous active sites are integrated with the highly conductive CoWP/CC nanowire array to obtain a 3-D layered configuration that effectively promotes HER kinetics. Moreover, the stability and long-term test results are shown in Fig. 5c. After the 2000th cycle, the LSV curve deviates slightly from that of the 1st cycle. This verifies that the catalyst is highly stable in the electrochemical HER reaction. Similarly, after 24 h of continuous operation (Fig. 5d), a relatively small reduction in the HER overpotential was observed. These results show the superior hydrogen evolution stability and durability of the catalyst. Overall, Co-doping optimizes and stabilizes the nanowire structure of WP, and then cooperates with the Co3O4 nanoparticles, thus achieving impressively high electrocatalytic activity for HER and excellent stability of the catalyst. The excellent stability can be confirmed from the TEM images, XRD patterns, and EDS data of Co3O4@CoWP/CC after 24 h of continuous electrolyzing at 10 mA cm−2 for the HER (Fig. S8 and S9). The microstructures, phase structure and compositions of the ultrafine Co3O4 nanolayer shelled CoWP nanowire are well maintained after the HER reaction.


image file: d0ra05950a-f5.tif
Fig. 5 HER performances of the catalysts in alkaline media. (a) LSV curves of Co3O4@CoWP/CC, CoWP/CC, and Co3O4/CC. (b) Tafel slopes and (c) polarization curves of Co3O4@CoWP/CC before (initial) and after 2000 cycles. (d) Chronopotentiometric measurement of Co3O4@CoWP/CC for 24 h at 10 mA cm−2.

Inspired by the good OER and HER performances, the Co3O4@CoWP/CC hybrid material was further applied as a bifunctional electrocatalyst (denoted as Co3O4@CoWP/CC‖Co3O4@CoWP/CC) for overall water splitting in a two-electrode configuration. As can be clearly seen in Fig. 6a, the Co3O4@CoWP/CC cell exhibits slightly inferior performance to that of the Pt/C‖RuO2 cell (cell potential 1.49 V at 10 mA cm−2) with a cell potential of 1.61 V at 10 mA cm−2, however this performance is much better than those of the most reported cobalt oxide bifunctional water splitting electrocatalysts, as illustrated in Fig. 6b.55–59 Furthermore, a comparison of electrocatalytic activity for the recently reported bifunctional catalysts is illustrated in Table 1. After 1000 CV cycles, the overall water electrolysis still shows good activity (Fig. 6c). The chronoamperometry curve at a constant current density shows no apparent degradation for over 24 h (Fig. 6d). Therefore, Co3O4@CoWP/CC exhibits excellent and stable electrocatalytic performance for overall water splitting. The significantly improved electrocatalytic properties can be attributed to the optimized structural characteristics, including the numerous exposed metal active sites due to the ultrafine Co3O4 nanoparticles, the improved electrical conductivity of the hierarchical architecture, and the strong synergistic effect between Co3O4 and CoWP.


image file: d0ra05950a-f6.tif
Fig. 6 (a) LSV curves of water splitting in a two-electrode system (inset: the optical photograph of the generation of gases). (b) Cell voltages required to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm−2 for overall water splitting. (c) Polarization curves before (initial) and after 1000 cycling tests. (d) Chronoamperometry curve at 10 mA cm−2. All tests were performed in alkaline media.
Table 1 Comparison of OER and HER activities for Co3O4@CoWP/CC with other reported bifunctional electrocatalysts in 1.0 M KOH
Catalysts Overpotential (mV) at 10 mA cm−2 Two-electrode E(V) at 10 mA cm−2 Ref.
OER HER
Co3O4@MoS2 269 207 1.59 3
WP NAs/CC 150 9
Co-WP 119 46
Co@Co3O4/FeNS-RGO 287 130 1.65 53
Co3O4/CoMoO4 244 143 1.61 54
Co@Co3O4-NC 391 221 2.00 60
CoWP@(S,N)–C 430 61 61
CoP/NF 281 95 1.61 62
ZIF@LDH@NF 318 106 1.59 63
Co3O4@CoWP/CC 269 118 1.61 This work


Based on the above results, the as-prepared Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrocatalyst displays enhanced water electrolysis. The reasons for this can be described as follows: (i) the affinity of CoWP and Co3O4 can promote the electrolytic reaction of water. In the OER process, the homogeneous and stable coverage of the ultrafine Co3O4 nanolayer on the nanowires forms step sites or dislocations,14 increasing the active surface area of the electrode, providing more reactive sites, and enhancing the adsorption of the oxygen intermediates.49,50 In the HER process, the Co-doping in CoWP exhibits a coordinative effect, enhancing water dissociation and optimizing hydrogen adsorption/desorption, and this consequently facilitates all of the HER steps in alkaline solutions.45–47 (ii) Due to the synergistic interactions (such as higher conductivity, good electron/mass transport, high mechanical strength, and excellent catalytic stability) between the highly conductive CoWP/CC matrix and the ultrafine Co3O4 nanolayer, the peculiar hierarchical 3-D structure exhibits superior electrocatalytic water splitting performance. (iii) The free-standing growth of the catalyst on the conductive substrate avoids the use of a post-coating process and the addition of a binder. The array nanowires with open space facilitate the penetration of the electrolyte and the diffusion of electron/ionic species, resulting in the high utilization efficiency of the active ingredients.51,52 Therefore, such integration of heterogeneous assembly induces significantly enhanced OER and HER activities, leading to a highly efficient bifunctional catalyst for alkaline water electrolysis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we constructed a 3D Co3O4@CoWP hybrid grown on carbon cloth as an active and robust bifunctional electrocatalyst for alkaline water electrolysis. The obtained Co3O4@CoWP/CC electrode shows impressive catalytic activities for the OER (η10 = 269 mV) and HER (η10 = 118 mV). An alkaline electrolyzer of Co3O4@CoWP/CC requires a cell voltage of only 1.61 V to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm−2, and this is more active than most reported non-metal electrocatalysts. The improved overall water splitting ability can be ascribed to the unique nanostructure that provides not only sufficient active sites for the electrode reactions, but also suitable routes for the transport of ions, electrons, and gas molecules, as well as the synergistic interactions between CoWP and the surface-modified ultrathin layer that is composed of Co3O4 nanoparticles, which facilitates the catalytic reaction kinetics. This work provides additional hopeful prospects for the development of highly efficient, stable, and low-cost catalysts that contain non-noble metals for electrochemical overall water electrolysis.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants U1804140, U21978021, and 21706242) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Center for Advanced Analysis and Gene Sequencing of Zhengzhou University.

Notes and references

  1. Y. Wang, R. K. Hocking, W. Adamson and C. Zhao, Overall electrochemical splitting of water at the heterogeneous interface of nickel and iron oxide, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 1–10 CrossRef PubMed.
  2. J. Yang, D. Guo, S. Zhao, Y. Lin, R. Yang, D. Xu, N. Shi, X. Zhang, L. Lu, Y. Q. Lan, J. Bao and M. Han, Small, 2019, 15, 1–12 Search PubMed.
  3. J. Liu, J. Wang, B. Zhang, Y. Ruan, H. Wan, X. Ji, K. Xu, D. Zha, L. Miao and J. Jiang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 2067–2072 RSC.
  4. Y. H. Chung, I. Jang, J. H. Jang, H. S. Park, H. C. Ham, J. H. Jang, Y. K. Lee and S. J. Yoo, Anomalous in situ activation of carbon-supported Ni2P nanoparticles for oxygen evolving electrocatalysis in alkaline media, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, 1–8 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. C. Zhu, Q. Shi, S. Feng, D. Du and Y. Lin, Single-atom catalysts for electrochemical water splitting, ACS Energy Lett., 2018, 3, 1713–1721 CrossRef CAS.
  6. Q. Zhang, N. M. Bedford, J. Pan, X. Lu and R. Amal, A fully reversible water electrolyzer cell made up from FeCoNi (oxy) hydroxide atomic layers, Adv. Energy Mater., 2019, 9, 1–13 Search PubMed.
  7. D. Lyu, Y. Du, S. Huang, B. Y. Mollamahale, X. Zhang, S. W. Hasan, F. Yu, S. Wang, Z. Q. Tian and P. K. Shen, Highly efficient multifunctional Co–N–C electrocatalysts with synergistic effects of Co–N moieties and Co metallic nanoparticles encapsulated in a N-doped carbon matrix for water-splitting and oxygen redox reactions, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11, 39809–39819 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. Q. Liang, H. Jin, Z. Wang, Y. Xiong, S. Yuan, X. Zeng, D. He and S. Mu, Metal-organic frameworks derived reverse-encapsulation Co-NC@Mo2C complex for efficient overall water splitting, Nano Energy, 2019, 57, 746–752 CrossRef CAS.
  9. Z. Pu, Q. Liu, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Tungsten phosphide nanorod arrays directly grown on carbon cloth: a highly efficient and stable hydrogen evolution cathode at all pH values, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 21874–21879 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. E. J. Popczun, J. R. McKone, C. G. Read, A. J. Biacchi, A. M. Wiltrout, N. S. Lewis and R. E. Schaak, Nanostructured nickel phosphide as an electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 9267–9270 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. Q. Liu, J. Tian, W. Cui, P. Jiang, N. Cheng, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Carbon nanotubes decorated with CoP nanocrystals: A highly active non-noble-metal nanohybrid electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 6710–6714 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. P. Xiao, M. A. Sk, L. Thia, X. Ge, R. J. Lim, J. Y. Wang, K. H. Lim and X. Wang, Molybdenum phosphide as an efficient electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, 2624–2629 RSC.
  13. P. Jiang, Q. Liu, Y. Liang, J. Tian, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, A cost-effective 3D hydrogen evolution cathode with high catalytic activity: FeP nanowire array as the active phase, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 12855–12859 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. J. Tian, Q. Liu, N. Cheng, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Self-supported Cu3P nanowire arrays as an integrated high-performance three-dimensional cathode for generating hydrogen from water, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 9577–9581 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. M. Pi, T. Wu, D. Zhang, S. Chen and S. Wang, Self-supported three-dimensional mesoporous semimetallic WP2 nanowire arrays on carbon cloth as a flexible cathode for efficient hydrogen evolution, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 19779–19786 RSC.
  16. Z. Cai, A. Wu, H. Yan, Y. Xiao, C. Chen, C. Tian, L. Wang, R. Wang and H. Fu, Hierarchical whisker-on-sheet NiCoP with adjustable surface structure for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 7619–7629 RSC.
  17. J. Tian, Q. Liu, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Self-supported nanoporous cobalt phosphide nanowire arrays: an efficient 3D hydrogen-evolving cathode over the wide range of pH 0–14, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 7587–7590 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. C. Tang, R. Zhang, W. Lu, L. He, X. Jiang, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Fe-doped CoP nanoarray: a monolithic multifunctional catalyst for highly efficient hydrogen generation, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1602441 CrossRef PubMed.
  19. D. Jiang, Y. Xu, R. Yang, D. Li, S. Meng and M. Chen, CoP3/CoMoP heterogeneous nanosheet arrays as robust electrocatalyst for pH-universal hydrogen evolution reaction, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2019, 7, 9309–9317 CrossRef CAS.
  20. Z. Ren, X. Ren, L. Zhang, C. Fu, X. Li, Y. Zhang, B. Gao, L. Yang, P. K. Chu and K. Huo, Tungsten-doped CoP nanoneedle arrays grown on carbon cloth as efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting, ChemElectroChem, 2019, 6, 5229–5236 CrossRef CAS.
  21. A. Mendoza-Garcia, H. Zhu, Y. Yu, Q. Li, L. Zhou, D. Su, M. J. Kramer and S. Sun, Controlled anisotropic growth of Co-Fe-P from Co-Fe-O nanoparticles, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 9642–9645 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. J. Li, M. Yan, X. Zhou, Z. Q. Huang, Z. Xia, C. R. Chang, Y. Ma and Y. Qu, Mechanistic insights on ternary Ni2−xCoxP for hydrogen evolution and their hybrids with graphene as highly efficient and robust catalysts for overall water splitting, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2016, 26, 6785–6796 CrossRef CAS.
  23. J. Liu, J. Wang, B. Zhang, Y. Ruan, L. Lv, X. Ji, K. Xu, L. Miao and J. Jiang, Hierarchical NiCo2S4@NiFe LDH heterostructures supported on nickel foam for enhanced overall-water-splitting activity, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 15364–15372 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. Y. Guo, J. Tang, Z. Wang, Y. M. Kang, Y. Bando and Y. Yamauchi, Elaborately assembled metal sulfides as a bifunctional core–shell structured catalyst for highly efficient electrochemical overall water splitting, Nano Energy, 2018, 47, 494–502 CrossRef CAS.
  25. J. Saha, R. Ball, A. Sah, V. Kalyani and C. Subramaniam, The mechanistic role of a support-catalyst interface in electrocatalytic water reduction by Co3O4 supported nanocarbon florets, Nanoscale, 2019, 11, 13532–13540 RSC.
  26. T. Chen, S. Li, L. Ma, X. Zhao and G. Fang, Aldehyde reduced Co3O4 to form oxygen vacancy and enhance the electrochemical performance for oxygen evolution reaction and supercapacitors, Nanotechnology, 2019, 30, 395403 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. S. S. Jayaseelan and N. Bhuvanendran, Co3O4 nanoparticles decorated polypyrrole/carbon nanocomposite as efficient bi-functional electrocatalyst for electrochemical water splitting, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45, 4587–4595 CrossRef CAS.
  28. J. Wu, Y. Xue, X. Yan, W. Yan, Q. Cheng and Y. Xie, Co3O4 nanocrystals on single-walled carbon nanotubes as a highly efficient oxygen-evolving catalyst, Nano Res., 2012, 5, 521–530 CrossRef CAS.
  29. S. Yang, Y. Liu, Y. Hao, X. Yang, W. A. Goddard, X. L. Zhang and B. Cao, Oxygen-vacancy abundant ultrafine Co3O4/graphene composites for high-rate supercapacitor electrodes, Adv. Sci., 2018, 5, 1700659 CrossRef PubMed.
  30. Y. Duan, Y. Sun, S. Pan, Y. Dai, L. Hao and J. Zou, Self-Stable WP/C Support with excellent cocatalytic functionality for Pt: enhanced catalytic activity and durability for methanol electro-oxidation, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 33572–33582 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. Y. Tan, H. Wang, P. Liu, Y. Shen, C. Cheng, A. Hirata, T. Fujita, Z. Tang and M. Chen, Versatile nanoporous bimetallic phosphides towards electrochemical water splitting, Energy Environ. Sci., 2016, 9, 2257–2261 RSC.
  32. H. Zhou, G. Ran, J. F. Masson, C. Wang, Y. Zhao and Q. Song, Novel tungsten phosphide embedded nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes: a portable and renewable monitoring platform for anticancer drug in whole blood, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2018, 105, 226–235 CrossRef PubMed.
  33. R. Li, D. Zhou, J. Luo, W. Xu, J. Li, S. Li, P. Cheng and D. Yuan, The urchin-like sphere arrays Co3O4 as a bifunctional catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction and oxygen evolution reaction, J. Power Sources, 2017, 341, 250–256 CrossRef CAS.
  34. T. Y. Ma, S. Dai, M. Jaroniec and S. Z. Qiao, Metal-organic framework derived hybrid Co3O4-carbon porous nanowire arrays as reversible oxygen evolution electrodes, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 13925–13931 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  35. W. Xu, F. Lyu, Y. Bai, A. Gao, J. Feng, Z. Cai and Y. Yin, Porous cobalt oxide nanoplates enriched with oxygen vacancies for oxygen evolution reaction, Nano Energy, 2018, 43, 110–116 CrossRef CAS.
  36. C. Tang, L. Gan, R. Zhang, W. Lu, X. Jiang, A. M. Asiri, X. Sun, J. Wang and L. Chen, Ternary FexCo1−xP nanowire array as a robust hydrogen evolution reaction electrocatalyst with Pt-like activity: experimental and theoretical insight, Nano Lett., 2016, 16, 6617–6621 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. H. Du, L. Xia, S. Zhu, F. Qu and F. Qu, Al-doped Ni2P nanosheet array: a superior and durable electrocatalyst for alkaline hydrogen evolution, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 2894–2897 RSC.
  38. X. Han, X. Wu, C. Zhong, Y. Deng, N. Zhao and W. Hu, NiCo2S4 nanocrystals anchored on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as a highly efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for rechargeable zinc-air batteries, Nano Energy, 2017, 31, 541–550 CrossRef CAS.
  39. Z. Wang, H. Liu, R. Ge, X. Ren, J. Ren, D. Yang, L. Zhang and X. Sun, Phosphorus-doped Co3O4 nanowire array: a highly efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 2236–2241 CrossRef CAS.
  40. Y. Zhong, Z. Pan, X. Wang, J. Yang, Y. Qiu and S. Xu, Hierarchical Co3O4 nano-micro arrays featuring superior activity as cathode in a flexible and rechargeable zinc-air battery, Adv. Sci., 2019, 6, 1802243 CrossRef PubMed.
  41. M. Li, Y. Zhu, H. Wang, C. Wang, N. Pinna and X. Lu, Ni strongly coupled with Mo2C encapsulated in nitrogen-doped carbon nanofibers as robust bifunctional catalyst for overall water splitting, Adv. Energy Mater., 2019, 9, 1–11 Search PubMed.
  42. S. Li, S. Sirisomboonchai, A. Yoshida, X. An, X. Hao, A. Abudula and G. Guan, Bifunctional CoNi/CoFe2O4/Ni foam electrodes for efficient overall water splitting at a high current density, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 19221–19230 RSC.
  43. J. A. Koza, Z. He, A. S. Miller and J. A. Switzer, Electrodeposition of crystalline Co3O4 – a catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction, Chem. Mater., 2012, 24, 3567–3573 CrossRef CAS.
  44. N. H. Chou, P. N. Ross, A. T. Bell and T. D. Tilley, Comparison of cobalt-based nanoparticles as electrocatalysts for water oxidation, ChemSusChem, 2011, 4, 1566–1569 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  45. X. Huang, X. Xu, X. Luan and D. Cheng, CoP nanowires coupled with CoMoP nanosheets as a highly efficient cooperative catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction, Nano Energy, 2020, 68, 104332 CrossRef CAS.
  46. J. Wang, K. Chang, Z. Sun, J. H. Lee, B. M. Tackett, C. Zhang, J. G. Chen and C. J. Liu, A combined experimental and theoretical study of the accelerated hydrogen evolution kinetics over wide pH range on porous transition metal doped tungsten phosphide electrocatalysts, Appl. Catal., B, 2019, 251, 162–167 CrossRef CAS.
  47. X. D. Wang, Y. F. Xu, H. S. Rao, W. J. Xu, H. Y. Chen, W. X. Zhang, D. Bin Kuang and C. Y. Su, Novel porous molybdenum tungsten phosphide hybrid nanosheets on carbon cloth for efficient hydrogen evolution, Energy Environ. Sci., 2016, 9, 1468–1475 RSC.
  48. P. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. Wan, S. Guo, G. Lu, J. Yao and X. Huang, Precise tuning in platinum–nickel/nickel sulfide interface nanowires for synergistic hydrogen evolution catalysis, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 1–9 CrossRef PubMed.
  49. A. Nairan, P. Zou, C. Liang, J. Liu, D. Wu, P. Liu and C. Yang, NiMo solid solution nanowire array electrodes for highly efficient hydrogen evolution reaction, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2019, 29, 1–8 Search PubMed.
  50. H. Zhou, F. Yu, Y. Huang, J. Sun, Z. Zhu, R. J. Nielsen, R. He, J. Bao, W. A. Goddard, S. Chen and Z. Ren, Efficient hydrogen evolution by ternary molybdenum sulfoselenide particles on self-standing porous nickel diselenide foam, Nat. Commun., 2016, 7, 1–7 Search PubMed.
  51. X. D. Wang, H. Y. Chen, Y. F. Xu, J. F. Liao, B. X. Chen, H. S. Rao, D. Bin Kuang and C. Y. Su, Self-supported NiMoP2 nanowires on carbon cloth as an efficient and durable electrocatalyst for overall water splitting, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 7191–7199 RSC.
  52. S. Li, W. Zang, X. Liu, S. J. Pennycook and Z. Kou, Heterojunction engineering of MoSe2/MoS2 with electronic modulation towards synergetic hydrogen evolution reaction and supercapacitance performance, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 359, 1419–1426 CrossRef CAS.
  53. J. Zhu, W. Tu, Z. Bai, H. Pan, P. Ji, H. Zhang, Z. Deng and H. Zhang, Zeolitic-imidazolate-framework-derived Co@Co3O4 embedded into iron, nitrogen, sulfur Co-doped reduced graphene oxide as efficient electrocatalysts for overall water splitting and zinc-air batteries, Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 323, 134821 CrossRef CAS.
  54. Z. Pei, L. Xu and W. Xu, Hierarchical honeycomb-like Co3O4 pores coating on CoMoO4 nanosheets as bifunctional efficient electrocatalysts for overall water splitting, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 433, 256–263 CrossRef CAS.
  55. H. Begum and S. Jeon, Highly efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalyst for water splitting on Fe–Co3O4/carbon nanotubes, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43, 5522–5529 CrossRef CAS.
  56. G. Cheng, T. Kou, J. Zhang, C. Si, H. Gao and Z. Zhang, O22−/O functionalized oxygen-deficient Co3O4 nanorods as high performance supercapacitor electrodes and electrocatalysts towards water splitting, Nano Energy, 2017, 38, 155–166 CrossRef CAS.
  57. Y. P. Zhu, T. Y. Ma, M. Jaroniec and S. Z. Qiao, Self-templating synthesis of hollow Co3O4 microtube arrays for highly efficient water electrolysis, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 1324–1328 CrossRef CAS.
  58. S. Du, Z. Ren, J. Zhang, J. Wu, W. Xi, J. Zhu and H. Fu, Co3O4 nanocrystal ink printed on carbon fiber paper as a large-area electrode for electrochemical water splitting, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 8066–8069 RSC.
  59. Z. Xiao, Y. Wang, Y. C. Huang, Z. Wei, C. L. Dong, J. Ma, S. Shen, Y. Li and S. Wang, Filling the oxygen vacancies in Co3O4 with phosphorus: an ultra-efficient electrocatalyst for overall water splitting, Energy Environ. Sci., 2017, 10, 2563–2569 RSC.
  60. C. Bai, S. Wei, D. Deng, X. Lin, M. Zheng and Q. Dong, A nitrogen-doped nano carbon dodecahedron with Co@Co3O4 implants as a bi-functional electrocatalyst for efficient overall water splitting, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 9533–9536 RSC.
  61. B. Weng, C. R. Grice, W. Meng, L. Guan, F. Xu, Y. Yu, C. Wang, D. Zhao and Y. Yan, Metal-organic framework-derived CoWP@C composite nanowire electrocatalyst for efficient water splitting, ACS Energy Lett., 2018, 3, 1434–1442 CrossRef CAS.
  62. P. Wang, F. Song, R. Amal, Y. H. Ng and X. Hu, Efficient water splitting catalyzed by cobalt phosphide-based nanoneedle arrays supported on carbon cloth, ChemSusChem, 2016, 9, 472–477 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  63. Y. Tang, X. Fang, X. Zhang, G. Fernandes, Y. Yan, D. Yan, X. Xiang and J. He, Space-confined earth-abundant bifunctional electrocatalyst for high-efficiency water splitting, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 36762–36771 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d0ra05950a
These authors contributed equally.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020