Qiuju
Shi
a,
Weina
Zhang
a,
Yuemeng
Ji
*a,
Jiaxin
Wang
a,
Dandan
Qin
a,
Jiangyao
Chen
ab,
Yanpeng
Gao
a,
Guiying
Li
ab and
Taicheng
An
a
aGuangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Health Risk Control, Guangzhou Key Laboratory Environmental Catalysis and Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Institute of Environmental Health and Pollution Control, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China. E-mail: jiym@gdut.edu.cn
bSynergy Innovation Institute of GDUT, Shantou 515041, China
First published on 29th October 2020
Correction for ‘Enhanced uptake of glyoxal at the acidic nanoparticle interface: implications for secondary organic aerosol formation’ by Qiuju Shi et al., Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2020, 7, 1126–1135, DOI: 10.1039/D0EN00016G.
Correspondingly, in Section 3.3, on page 1131, the following sentence should be included in the third sentence of the third paragraph: “Herein, the discussed ΔG‡ value of RCOM+H2O/RCOM+SA is defined as the difference between the energies of TSCOM+H2O/TSCOM+SA and COMGL–H2O”.
Additionally, the second sentence in the fourth paragraph should be “Our calculated ΔG‡ value of RGL+H2O agrees with the previous theoretical study (37.0 kcal mol−1)62 which obtained the solvent energies based on the optimized gas-phase geometry”.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 |