Correction: X-ray CT observation and characterization of water transformation in heavy objects

Satoshi Takeya; Michihiro Muraoka; Sanehiro Muromachi; Kazuyuki Hyodo; Akio Yoneyama

doi:10.1039/D0CP90129F

View PDF VersionPrevious ArticleNext Article

Open Access Article

This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP90129F (Correction) Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 14377-14379

Correction: X-ray CT observation and characterization of water transformation in heavy objects

Satoshi Takeya *^a, Michihiro Muraoka ^b, Sanehiro Muromachi ^b, Kazuyuki Hyodo ^c and Akio Yoneyama ^d
^aNational Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Central 5, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba 305-8565, Japan. E-mail: s.takeya@aist.go.jp; Tel: +81 29 861 6006
^bResearch Institute of Energy Frontier (RIEF), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 16-1 Onogawa, Tsukuba 305-8569, Japan
^cHigh Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Oho, Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan
^dSAGA Light Source, 8-7 Yayoigaoka Tosu, Saga 841-0005, Japan

Received 8th June 2020 , Accepted 8th June 2020

First published on 17th June 2020

Abstract

Correction for ‘X-ray CT observation and characterization of water transformation in heavy objects’ by Satoshi Takeya et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 3446–3454, DOI: 10.1039/c9cp05983k.

The authors would like to update Fig. 5 and 7 to correct errors present in the published version of the article.


	Fig. 5 Cross section of three different resin beads in a PP tube at 295 K. PP tube filled with (a) pure water, (b) 3.5 wt% NaCl solution, (c) 10 wt% NaCl solution, and (d) 20 wt% NaCl solution, measured by absorption-contrast X-ray CT using X-rays of 35 keV. (e) PP tube filled with pure water and measured by DEI X-ray CT using X-rays of 35 keV. Cross section of three different resin beads in a PP tube filled with pure water in an Al container with a ∅ 13 mm inner diameter and 1.0 mm wall thickness, measured by (f) absorption-contrast X-ray CT and (g) DEI X-ray CT using X-rays of 35 keV.


	Fig. 7 DEI image of a THF hydrate sample in butyl rubber and an Al container with a ∅ 13 mm inner diameter and 1.0 mm wall thickness. Cross section of a quarter of the sample container (a) with styrene beads of 1 mm in diameter, (b) longitudinal view, and (c) enlarged cross section of the interparticle pore spaces. Volume rendered image of THF hydrate of the interparticle pore spaces of the styrene beads: (d) smaller scale and (e) larger scale.

On page 3451, the notations “PP” and “Nylon” in Fig. 5(a)–(d), and (f) are in the wrong place.

On page, 3452, Fig. 7(d) and (e) mistakenly reproduce a portion of Fig. 7 from a paper by Kerkar et al.¹ The relevant parts of the figure were correct in the original submission but were replaced in error upon submission of the revised manuscript when updating the figure in response to reviewer comments.

The correct versions of Fig. 5 and 7 are shown here.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.

References

P. B. Kerkar, K. Horvat, K. W. Jones and D. Mahajan, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 2014, 15, 4759–4768 CrossRef CAS.