Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Large negative linear compressibility of a porous molecular co-crystal

Szymon Sobczak a, Aleksandra Półrolniczak a, Paulina Ratajczyk a, Weizhao Cai a, Andrzej Gładysiak a, Varvara I. Nikolayenko b, Dominic C. Castell b, Leonard J. Barbour *b and Andrzej Katrusiak *a
aDepartment of Chemistry, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland. E-mail: katran@amu.edu.pl
bDepartment of Chemistry and Polymer Science, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland 7600, South Africa. E-mail: ljb@sun.ac.za

Received 17th January 2020 , Accepted 9th March 2020

First published on 17th March 2020


Abstract

Flexible and transformable molecules, particularly those responding to external stimuli, are needed for designing sensors and porous compounds capable of storing or separating gases and liquids. Under normal conditions the photochromic compound, 1,2-bis[2-methyl-5-(pyridyl)-3thienyl]cyclopentene (BTCP) forms a porous co-crystal with 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene (dItFB). It traps acetone (Ac) molecules in the pores. Owing to a unique system of pores in the polar framework, the crystal is sensitive to the humidity in the air and to the chosen liquid environment. When compressed in non-penetrating media, the crystal displays a strong negative linear compressibility (NLC) along [100].


The search for environmentally-friendly methods for storing fuels1–6 and for removing pollution and waste7–9 drives the current interest in various kinds of porous materials. Crystalline compounds with well-defined pores and cages are especially promising for these purposes. Although the field of porous materials is dominated by microporous zeolites and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), molecular systems can be attractive for several reasons.10,11 Owing to the structural and chemical variability generated by modular assembly, it is possible to change the pore sizes and to fine-tune the shape and functionality of the pores in materials free of metal ions. The inclusion of stimulus-responsive molecules can result in unprecedented properties of such porous molecular systems.

Interesting phenomena related to stimulus-responsive compounds include interconversions between isomeric forms and topochemical reactions triggered by light. The molecules of such compounds are conformationally flexible and capable of undergoing low-energy reactions, involving breaking and forming covalent bonds.

To investigate the high-pressure behaviour of this class of materials we have chosen a bis-3-thienylcyclopentene derivative of 1,2-bis[2′-methyl-5′-(pyrid-4′′-yl)-thien-3'-yl]perfluoro-cyclopentene (BTCP).12–18 When irradiated with ultraviolet light, this group of compounds undergoes solid-state photocyclization, yielding a stable isomeric form with a closed ring. Exposure to visible light results in the ring-open form.16,18 The reactivity of BTCP, as shown in Fig. 1 derivatives can be triggered in relatively large aggregates. Even single crystals can undergo bulk conversions, involving reversible structural changes, such as pore opening.16 It is well-known that high pressure often induces prominent changes in crystal structure,19,20 phase transitions,21–28 sorption of solvent molecules29–34 and chemical reactions.35–41 Moreover, it was found that flexible molecules assembled into aggregates or polymeric frameworks under hydrostatic pressure can exhibit counterintuitive elastic properties, including negative linear and area compression.36,42–45


image file: d0cc00461h-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) The asymmetric unit of co-crystal BTCPs·dItFB·Ac and (b) the structural formula of BTCP, dItFB as well as the guests described in our work. In (a), the anisotropic thermal parameters are shown at the 50% probability level and the disordered Ac molecule is shown in one of its half-occupied sites only.

Here we report the isothermal compression of a porous molecular co-crystal solvate, hereafter abbreviated as BTCPs·dItFB·Ac, of 1,2-bis[2′-methyl-5′-(pyrid-4′′-yl)-thien-3′-yl]perfluorocyclopentene with 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene (dItFB) and acetone (Ac).46 We have established that in the range of 0–2.5 GPa at room temperature this crystal exhibits pronounced negative linear compressibility (NLC).

BTCP and dltFB co-crystallize from acetone under ambient conditions, with acetone molecules trapped in guest-accessible pockets (Fig. 2). We have established that the crystals lose part of their solvent content when exposed to air, and that the quality of such dried crystals can be recovered with a few drops of water. This results in subsequent improvement of the X-ray diffraction data, yielding higher resolution and a lower Rint parameter. The water molecules penetrate the pores of the BTCPs·dItFB·Ac crystal, causing some elongation along [001] (Table 1). The unit cell volume of the partially hydrated co-crystals increases by 10.8(7) Å3, i.e., 2.7 Å3 per asymmetric unit. This H2O adsorption is associated with anisotropic strain of the crystal: parameters b and c elongate by about 0.07 Å and 0.015 Å, respectively, while parameter a shortens by −0.02 Å (Table 1). However, no water molecules could be located in the crystal structure of the crystals exposed to moisture, which suggests non-stoichiometric sorption of H2O into disordered positions in the pores. Although the uptake of water in molecular crystals and MOFs usually increases the volume, it has been shown that adsorption of water can also result in a significant reduction of volume.47–49


image file: d0cc00461h-f2.tif
Fig. 2 The size and arrangement of voids (a) at ambient pressure and (b) at 2.5 GPa. The voids are shown for a 1.2 Å probe radius and grid spacing 0.2 Å using the program Mercury.
Table 1 Selected crystallographic data of co-crystal BTCP·dItFB·Ac (cf. Table S4 in ESI for details)
*Dx – the initial stoichiometry BTCP·dItFB·Ac without water content was assumed for the density calculations.
Pressure [GPa] 0.0001 0.0001 0.40 0.70 1.09 1.59 1.95 2.50
Environment Air Water Glycerol Glycerol Glycerol Glycerol Glycerol Glycerol
Space group Pna21 Pna21 Pna21 Pna21 Pna21 Pna21 Pna21 Pna21
a (Å) 17.2716(8) 17.2451(6) 17.475(9) 17.449(4) 17.559(5) 17.604(14) 17.564(10) 17.606(4)
b (Å) 27.171(3) 27.2415(16) 26.52(5) 26.511(15) 26.315(16) 25.83(6) 25.64(5) 25.580(17)
c (Å) 7.9406(7) 7.9554(3) 7.662(7) 7.536(11) 7.259(8) 7.13(4) 7.07(3) 6.944(9)
V3) 3726.5(6) 3737.3(3) 3551(8) 3486(5) 3354(4) 3240(20) 3185(15) 3127(5)
Z/Z 4/1 4/1 4/1 4/1 4/1 4/1 4/1 4/1
D x (g cm−3)* 1.803* 1.808* 1.903* 1.938* 2.014* 2.085* 2.121* 2.161*


A single crystal of BTCPs·dItFB·Ac, which had been stored in a dry environment, was compressed in glycerol. Although disordered H2O molecules could not be located up to 1.95 GPa, it was possible to model one water molecule per asymmetric unit at 2.5 GPa. This suggests that their ordering takes place at higher pressure. Karl Fischer titration of the glycerol confirmed the presence of somewhat less that 2% (wt) of water, which could be the origin of the water molecules located in the pores of the compressed sample. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data were recorded at pressures of 0.4, 0.7, 1.09, 1.59, 1.95 and 2.5 GPa. High-pressure experiments were carried out in a Merrill-Bassett diamond-anvil cell (DAC), modified by mounting the diamond anvils directly on steel supports with conical windows.50 The DAC was centred using the gasket shadowing method.51 Starting from the ambient-pressure model, the high-pressure crystal structures were refined using the least-squares method of SHELXL.52 The pressure in the DAC was calibrated by the ruby fluorescence method, using a Photon Control spectrometer with enhanced resolution, affording an accuracy of 0.02 GPa.53,54 X-Ray data were measured on a four-circle Oxford-Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer equipped with an EOS-CCD detector. Due to the strongly disordered acetone molecule in all high-pressure measurements, the SQUEEZE algorithm of PLATON was applied.55 The crystallographic data and experimental details are summarized in Table 1 and Table S4 (ESI) and have been deposited in CIF format at the Cambridge Structural Database with numbers CCDC 1886608–1886615.

Isothermal compression of a single crystal of BTCPs·dItFB·Ac immersed in glycerol induces negative linear compressibility (NLC) along [100], i.e., perpendicular to the pore channels. The NLC of the co-crystal along this direction is unprecedented in magnitude for an organic molecular crystal, reaching −30 TPa−1 between 0.1 MPa and 0.4 GPa (cf. Table S1 in the ESI).56 The crystal compressibility is clearly nonlinear (Fig. 3) and the NLC magnitude gradually reduces to −15.54 TPa−1 between 0.1 MPa and 0.7 GPa, Table S1 (ESI). The NLC in molecular crystals originates from anisotropic structural features. For the BTCP cocrystal the NLC can be rationalized using the wine-rack mechanism, as the NLC effect occurs along the elongation direction of the cross-section of the pores (compare Fig. 2 and 3). The compression also involves changes in the conformation of molecules, and in their arrangement.


image file: d0cc00461h-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Compression of co-crystal BTCP·dItFB·Ac in glycerol plotted relative to the 0.1 MPa dimensions. The error bars are smaller than the plotted symbols. The inset shows a graphical representation of the compressibility tensor calculated between the 0.1 MPa and 0.7 GPa (cf. Fig. S3 and Table S3 in ESI).56

The initial compression up to 0.4 GPa affects the BTCP conformation. The perfluorocyclopentene and heterocyclic aromatic rings of BTCP approximate the shape of an isosceles triangle. The rings are flat and of well-known regular geometry. However, owing to the single bonds that join them, the molecule is flexible. As the pressure increases, the molecule becomes elongated. We have established that the molecular shape of BTCP is most affected by pressure up to 0.4 GPa, when the distance between terminal pyridine rings elongates by 1.7% (compared to 2.4% at 2.50 GPa). This elongation coincides with the NLC effect along [100]. The pressure effect on the intramolecular distance between two reactive carbon atoms in the thienyl groups is unfavourable for closing the ring.57 Only in the initial pressure range does this distance decrease insignificantly, but at 2.5 GPa it elongates considerably (Fig. 4).


image file: d0cc00461h-f4.tif
Fig. 4 The two molecules of BTCP from 0.40 GPa and 2.5 GPa superimposed on the perfluorocyclopentene ring.

In summary, we have investigated a porous and polar co-crystal solvate BTCP·dItFB·Ac. At ambient conditions, it absorbs or releases water depending on the surrounding moisture. Under pressure, the crystal displays strongly anisotropic compression coupled to the conformation of BTCP molecules. To our knowledge,43 the negative linear compressibility of over −30 TPa−1 is the strongest ever reported for an organic molecular crystal; similarly, we have observed that BTCP·dItFB·Ac displays an impressive positive linear compression of about 90 TPa−1, corresponding to the reduction by 12% at 2.5 GPa of the c unit cell parameter.

SS, AP and AK are grateful to the grant OPUS 10 No. UMO-2015/19/B/ST5/00262. SS also thanks grant POWR.03.02.00-00-I023/17 and AP grant POWR.03.02.00-00-I026/16 co-financed by the European Union through the European Social Fund under the Operational Program Knowledge Education Development for the finical support. LJB, VIN and DCC acknowledge the National Research Foundation of South Africa for support of this work.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Notes and references

  1. L. J. Murray, M. Dincă and J. R. Long, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1294 RSC.
  2. J. A. Mason, J. Oktawiec, M. K. Taylor, M. R. Hudson, J. Rodriguez, J. E. Bachman, M. I. Gonzalez, A. Cervellino, A. Guagliardi, C. M. Brown, P. L. Llewellyn, N. Masciocchi and J. R. Long, Nature, 2015, 527, 357–361 CrossRef CAS.
  3. W. R. Browne and B. L. Feringa, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2006, 1, 25–35 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. A. Dhakshinamoorthy, A. M. Asiri and H. García, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 5414–5445 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. M. Gallo and D. Glossman-Mitnik, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 6634–6642 CrossRef CAS.
  6. S. Noro, Metal-Organic Frameworks, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2013, vol. 5 Search PubMed.
  7. J. Liu, P. K. Thallapally and D. Strachan, Langmuir, 2012, 28, 11584–11589 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. B. Aguila, D. Banerjee, Z. Nie, Y. Shin, S. Ma and P. K. Thallapally, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 5940–5942 RSC.
  9. S. Jakobsen, D. Gianolio, D. S. Wragg, M. H. Nilsen, H. Emerich, S. Bordiga, C. Lamberti, U. Olsbye, M. Tilset and K. P. Lillerud, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2012, 86, 125429 CrossRef.
  10. T. Hasell and A. Cooper, Nat. Rev. Mater., 2016, 1, 16053 CrossRef CAS.
  11. J. R. Holst, A. Trewin and A. I. Cooper, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 915–920 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. K. Matsuda, Y. Shinkai and M. Irie, Inorg. Chem., 2004, 43, 3774–3776 CrossRef CAS.
  13. F. Luo, C. Bin Fan, M. B. Luo, X. L. Wu, Y. Zhu, S. Z. Pu, W. Y. Xu and G. C. Guo, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 9298–9301 CrossRef CAS.
  14. X. F. Feng, F. Luo, L. Zhang, A. M. Zheng, C. S. Yan, L. Le Gong, C. Bin Fan, H. Q. Wu and Z. Q. Liu, Chem. Commun., 2016, 53, 763–766 Search PubMed.
  15. K. Matsuda, K. Takayama and M. Irie, Chem. Commun., 2001, 363–364 RSC.
  16. H. Sato, R. Matsuda, S. Kitagawa, Y. Zheng, H. J. Jeon and P. Wu, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 100 CrossRef PubMed.
  17. V. I. Nikolayenko, S. A. Herbert and L. J. Barbour, Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 11142–11145 RSC.
  18. K. Nomiyama, M. Irie, K. Matsuda, M. Isayama, Y. Shinkai and T. Yamaguchi, Chem. Lett., 2003, 32, 1178–1179 CrossRef.
  19. C. Sanloup, The deep earth, Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2012, vol. 140 Search PubMed.
  20. Elena Boldyreva and P. Dera, High-Pressure Crystallography, Springer Science & Business Media, 2010 Search PubMed.
  21. S. Sobczak and A. Katrusiak, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, 2539–2545 CrossRef CAS.
  22. E. Patyk, J. Skumiel, M. Podsiadło and A. Katrusiak, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 2146–2150 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. M. Fisch, A. Lanza, E. Boldyreva, P. Macchi and N. Casati, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 18611–18617 CrossRef CAS.
  24. E. V. Boldyreva, S. N. Ivashevskaya, H. Sowa, H. Ahsbahs and H.-P. Weber, Dokl. Phys. Chem., 2004, 396, 111–114 CrossRef CAS.
  25. Y. Wang, K. Li, A. Sano-Furukawa, F. Hong, H. Zheng, A. Katrusiak, F. Liao, M. Andrzejewski, T. Hattori, L. Wang, H. Mao and Y. Meng, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 29510–29519 CrossRef CAS.
  26. F. P. A. Fabbiani, D. R. Allan, A. Dawson, W. I. F. David, P. A. McGregor, I. D. H. Oswald, S. Parsons and C. R. Pulham, Chem. Commun., 2003, 3004–3005 RSC.
  27. F. P. A. Fabbiani, D. R. Allan, W. I. F. David, A. J. Davidson, A. R. Lennie, S. Parsons, C. R. Pulham and J. E. Warren, Cryst. Growth Des., 2007, 7, 1115–1124 CrossRef CAS.
  28. F. P. A. Fabbiani and C. R. Pulham, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 932–942 RSC.
  29. F. X. Coudert, Chem. Mater., 2015, 27, 1905–1916 CrossRef CAS.
  30. S. Sobczak and A. Katrusiak, Cryst. Growth Des., 2018, 18, 1082–1089 CrossRef CAS.
  31. S. C. McKellar and S. A. Moggach, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci., Cryst. Eng. Mater., 2015, 71, 587–607 CrossRef CAS.
  32. S. A. Moggach, T. D. Bennett and A. K. Cheetham, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 7087–7089 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. S. A. Moggach, P. A. Wright, S. C. McKellar, A.-M. Banu, A. Greenaway, K. Ward, A. J. Graham, T. Düren and J. P. S. Mowat, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 8606–8613 CrossRef.
  34. J. Liu, S. Li, K. Yang, B. Zou, G. Zou, K. Wang, B. Liu and Q. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 5848–5853 CrossRef.
  35. M. Andrzejewski and A. Katrusiak, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2017, 8, 929–935 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  36. W. Cai, A. Gładysiak, M. Anioła, V. J. Smith, L. J. Barbour and A. Katrusiak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 9296–9301 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. J. P. Tidey, H. L. S. Wong, J. McMaster, M. Schröder and A. J. Blake, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci., Cryst. Eng. Mater., 2016, 72, 357–371 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. J. E. Warren, M. Murrie, S. A. Moggach, P. Parois, A. R. Lennie, N. Rowantree, S. Parsons, E. K. Brechin and K. W. Galloway, CrystEngComm, 2009, 11, 2601 RSC.
  39. R. J. Angel, N. L. Ross, E. C. Spencer, J. A. K. Howard and B. E. Hanson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 4022–4026 CrossRef PubMed.
  40. J. K. Clegg, A. J. Brock, K. A. Jolliffe, L. F. Lindoy, S. Parsons, P. A. Tasker and F. J. White, Chem. – Eur. J., 2017, 23, 12480–12483 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. A. Półrolniczak, S. Sobczak and A. Katrusiak, Inorg. Chem., 2018, 57, 8942–8950 CrossRef PubMed.
  42. W. Li, M. R. Probert, M. Kosa, T. D. Bennett, A. Thirumurugan, R. P. Burwood, M. Parinello, J. A. K. Howard and A. K. Cheetham, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 11940–11943 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  43. A. B. Cairns and A. L. Goodwin, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 20449–20465 RSC.
  44. R. H. Baughman, S. Stafström, C. Cui and S. O. Dantas, Science, 1998, 279, 1522–1524 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  45. W. Zieliński and A. Katrusiak, Cryst. Growth Des., 2014, 14, 4247–4253 CrossRef.
  46. V. I. Nikolayenko, D. C. Castell, D. P. van Heerden and L. J. Barbour, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 12086–12091 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  47. W. Zieliński and A. Katrusiak, CrystEngComm, 2015, 17, 5468–5473 RSC.
  48. M. Andrzejewski, N. Casati and A. Katrusiak, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46, 14795–14803 RSC.
  49. V. I. Nikolayenko, A. Heyns and L. J. Barbour, Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 11306–11309 RSC.
  50. L. Merrill and W. A. Bassett, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 1974, 45, 290–294 CrossRef.
  51. A. Budzianowski and A. Katrusiak, High-pressure crystallographic experiments with a CCD detector, in High-Pressure Crystallography, ed. A. Katrusiak and P. F. McMillan, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht Search PubMed.
  52. G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Struct, Chem., 2015, 71, 3–8 Search PubMed.
  53. G. J. Piermarini, S. Block, J. D. Barnett and R. A. Forman, J. Appl. Phys., 1975, 46, 2774–2780 CrossRef CAS.
  54. H. K. Mao, J. Xu and P. M. Bell, J. Geophys. Res., 1986, 91, 4673–4676 CrossRef CAS.
  55. A. L. Spek, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Struct, Chem., 2015, 71, 9–18 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  56. M. J. Cliffe and A. L. Goodwin, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2012, 45, 1321–1329 CrossRef CAS.
  57. X. Lin, J. Jia, P. Hubberstey, M. Schröder and N. R. Champness, CrystEngComm, 2007, 9, 438–448 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental details, literature survey concerning NLC coefficients, detailed conformational analisis and tabularized detailed crystallographic data. CCDC 1886608–1886615. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/d0cc00461h

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.