Fernando
Herrera
a,
Amparo
Luna
a,
Israel
Fernández
b and
Pedro
Almendros
*c
aGrupo de Lactamas y Heterociclos Bioactivos, Departamento de Química Orgánica, Unidad Asociada al CSIC, Facultad de Química, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040-Madrid, Spain
bDepartamento de Química Orgánica I and Centro de Innovación en Química Avanzada (ORFEO-CINQA), Facultad de CC. Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040-Madrid, Spain
cInstituto de Química Orgánica General, IQOG-CSIC, Juan de la Cierva 3, 28006-Madrid, Spain. E-mail: palmendros@iqog.csic.es
First published on 19th December 2019
The controlled synthesis of 1,4-naphthoquinones and tetraphene-7,12-diones, which bear the ABCD-ring of landomycins, has been accomplished directly through oxidative rearrangement of common stable precursors, namely, previously non-isolable cyclobuta[a]naphthalen-4(2H)-ones.
![]() | ||
Scheme 1 The allenynone framework as a platform for the synthesis of fused carbocycles: prior art and our method. |
Starting substrates, allenynols 2a–k, were prepared from alkynyl-benzaldehydes 1 and 3-substituted prop-2-ynyl bromides using an indium-mediated allenylation under Barbier conditions in aqueous media (Scheme 2). Further oxidation with IBX or Dess–Martin periodinane (DMP) to introduce the carbonyl moiety gives rise directly to cyclobutene-fused naphthalen-1-ones 3a–k (Scheme 2). It was found that the best results were systematically obtained in the presence of DMP. Because of the great reactivity imparted by the highly conjugated system in the initially formed non-isolable allenynones, [2+2] cycloaddition reactions take place spontaneously.6 Tricyclic cyclobutenes 3 were obtained with complete chemo- and regioselectivity in good yields.
To explore the reactivity of cyclobutene-fused naphthalen-1-ones 3, at the beginning of the study we selected N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) as a convenient electrophilic source of bromine and tricyclic cyclobutene 3a as a model substrate. In the event, the use of THF as solvent led to reaction failure. Fortunately, the replacement of THF by acetonitrile provided 2-methyl-3-(2-oxo-2-phenylethyl)naphthalene-1,4-dione 4a,7 but only in a modest 29% yield. Because of the structure of 4a, it may be apparent that adventitious water in the reaction medium was necessary. To prove this assumption, we carried out the reaction with the addition of 5.0 equiv. of water. Indeed, in this way a significant improvement of the yield of 4a up to 72% was achieved (Scheme 3). With the optimal conditions in hand, we evaluated the influence of substituents at the different positions of tricycles 3. A variety of aromatic moieties were well tolerated both at R2 and R3, while an aliphatic substituent was accommodated at R3 (Scheme 3). Even precursor 3j bearing two electron-donating substituents (R = MeO) on the aromatic ring, conveniently afforded naphthalene-1,4-dione 4j after NBS treatment. By contrast, the reaction of TMS-cyclobutene 2c was not satisfactory. Interestingly, the presence of a fluorine atom at the benzene ring such as in tricyclic cyclobutene 3h resulted in an extra-bromination on the final adduct 4h-Br (Scheme 3). The same phenomenon was observed starting from tricycle 3a under otherwise identical reaction conditions but through mild heating, which resulted in the formation of 4a-Br (Scheme 3). Pleasingly, it has been reported that several 2-methyl-3-alkyl-naphthalene-1,4-diones related to bicycles 4 possess interesting biological activities.8
A plausible mechanism for the NBS-promoted genesis of 1,4-naphthoquinones 4 is delineated in Scheme 4. The reaction is presumed to possess a radical nature, which was based on the suspension of the transformation after the addition of TEMPO to the reaction medium. Initially, the formation of allylic radical species INT-1 should occur by bromine radical attack. The formation of this radical should be followed by oxidation to the carbocationic species INT-2 by single electron transfer (SET) to the succinimide. Next, water attack takes place with formation of bromohydrin INT-3 which is followed by HBr release. Hydration of the resulting intermediate cyclobutenol INT-4 leads to diol INT-5, which evolves into zwitterionic intermediate INT-6. According to Density Functional Theory calculations (see ESI‡), this step proceeds with a low activation barrier of only 10.6 kcal mol−1 (for 3a). A subsequent proton transfer leads to dihydroquinone 4H in a highly exergonic transformation (ΔGR = −40.3 kcal mol−1, for 3a), which is finally oxidized to its quinone form 4.
Aiming to explore the effect of different reagents in the selective oxidative reorganization of cyclobutene-fused naphthalen-1-ones, we decided to expose tricycles 3 to the action of Selectfluor. The reaction of adduct 3a with Selectfluor was problematic and a complex mixture was obtained. By contrast, an encouraging result was obtained when adduct 3b having a phenyl group was used, because we unexpectedly isolated in a 19% yield tetracycle 5b that should arise from an angular benzannulation process. The presence of sodium bicarbonate in the reaction between Selectfluor and 3b caused an appreciable rise in the yield of 5b (Scheme 5). On this point, we next tested the scope of this rearrangement reaction using diverse fused-cyclobutenes 3 which contain a phenyl moiety at the cyclohexenone ring. A variety of differently substituted precursors 3, including fluoro- and methoxy-derivatives 3h and 3i were suitably rearranged. By contrast, the reaction of dimethoxy-substituted precursor 3k with Selectfluor was troublesome and the desired tetracycle 5k was not isolated in reasonable purity. Synthetically useful yields of tetracycles 5b and 5d–i were attained (Scheme 5). For all examples included in Scheme 5 no products of type 4 were observed. Noteworthy, tetracycles 5 bear the ABCD-ring of landomycins. Landomycins such as tetrangulol are a class of natural quinones characterized by an angular conjugated tetracyclic core, which confers them with interesting bioactivities.9 The major difficulty associated with the synthesis of landomycins is the formation of the B-ring due to hindrance issues. This elusive aspect is easily addressed in our preparation of the landomycin core.
In order to gain some mechanistic insights, control experiments were planned (Scheme 6). First, when tricycle 3b was treated with Selectfluor under the optimized conditions but using anhydrous acetonitrile, the yield of 5b decreased to 8% (Scheme 6). This result unveiled the origin of the oxygen at the C-ring, that should come from ambient water. Succeeding in performing a divergent preparation of 2-substituted-3-(2-oxo-2-arylethyl)naphthalene-1,4-diones 4 and 5-aryltetraphene-7,12-diones 5, we speculated about the possible intermediacy of 1,4-naphthoquinones 4 in the formation of angular tetracycles 5 in the presence of Selectfluor. When 1,4-naphthoquinone 4b was treated with Selectfluor and sodium bicarbonate under the optimized reaction conditions for the formation of pentacycles 5, the reaction failed and starting material 4b was fully recovered (Scheme 6). From the above experiment, it may be inferred that naphthalene-1,4-diones of type 4 should be discarded as intermediates for this reaction. The radical scavenger TEMPO effectively suppressed the formation of the required product, pointing to a radical reaction mechanism.
Based on the above experiments, we assume a mechanism as presented in Scheme 7 for the reaction of aryl-substituted cyclobutene-fused naphthalen-1-ones 3 with Selectfluor. Similar to the above-described reaction involving NBS, tricycles 3 can be converted into cationic intermediates INT-8 after Selectfluor treatment with concomitant formation of III. Next, this intermediate should suffer water attack to produce halohydrin INT-9, which evolves through cyclobutane ring opening followed by base-assisted HF release10 into the quinone INT-11. The so-formed polyene is able to undergo a 6π-electrocyclic ring closure to produce INT-12,11 which rapidly evolves into INT-13via a 1,3-hydrogen migration. According to DFT calculations on 3b (see ESI‡), this step proceeds with an activation barrier of 21.9 kcal mol−1 in a highly exergonic transformation (ΔGR = −28.2 kcal mol−1) driven by the gain in aromaticity in the system. Finally, INT-13 is oxidized into the observed tetracycles 5. Our calculations indicate that the concerted H2 release from either INT-13 or even from INT-12 thus directly forming 5 is unfeasible (ΔG‡ = 89.9 and 77.4 kcal mol−1, respectively). This points to a different mechanism for this final aromatization step,12 which is not evident to us at the moment.
![]() | ||
Scheme 7 Mechanistic explanation for the Selectfluor-promoted synthesis of tetraphene-7,12-diones 5. |
In conclusion, we have developed a divergent outcome transformation of the previously non-isolable cyclobuta[a]naphthalen-4(2H)-one system to afford either 1,4-naphthoquinones or tetraphene-7,12-diones, which has been accomplished through the reorganization of the above fused tricyclic cyclobutenes in the presence of NBS or Selectfluor.
This work was supported in part by AEI (MICIU) and FEDER (Project PGC2018-095025-B-I00 to P. A. and CTQ2016-78205-P and CTQ2016-81797-REDC to I. F.). F. H. thanks UCM for a predoctoral contract. We are grateful to M. Tiemblo in our group for the preparation of compounds 2j, 2k and 3j and Prof. B. Alcaide for continued support.
Footnotes |
† In memory of Prof. Odón Arjona. |
‡ Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures, compound characterization data, and copies of NMR spectra for all new compounds. See DOI: 10.1039/c9cc08628e |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 |