Open Access Article
Zhenting Yuab,
Yunpu Wang
*ab,
Lin Jiangab,
Leilei Daiab,
Yuhuan Liuab,
Roger Ruanabc,
Pingwei Wenab,
Yunfeng Zhaoab,
Dengle Duanabd,
Rongge Zouab,
Qiuhao Wuab and
Yanzhi Liab
aState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330047, China
bEngineering Research Center for Biomass Conversion, Ministry of Education, Nanchang University, 235 Nanjing East Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330047, China. E-mail: wangyunpu@ncu.edu.cn
cCenter for Biorefining and Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering University of Minnesota, 1390 Eckles Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
dDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, 2710 Crimson Way, Richland, WA 99354, USA
First published on 25th June 2019
This study reports the synthesis of a SiC-MCM41 composite catalyst by a microwave-assisted hydrothermal process and the composite catalyst had the characteristics of MCM41 and SiC, and the surface of SiC grew evenly with a layer of MCM41 after characterization of the catalysts by various means (X-ray diffraction, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller, scanning electron microscopy). The catalyst was applied in the pyrolysis of waste oil to investigate how it influences the bio-oil component proportion compared with no catalyst, only SiC, only MCM41 catalysis and the catalytic effect was also investigated at different temperatures and different catalyst to feed ratios. In a downdraft system with a pyrolysis temperature of 550 °C, a catalyst to feed ratio of 1
:
2, and a catalytic temperature of 400 °C, 32.43% C5–C12 hydrocarbons and 41.10% mono-aromatics were obtained. The composite catalyst combined the catalytic effect of SiC and MCM41 because it increased the amount of C5–C12 hydrocarbons and decreased the amount of oxygen-containing compounds in bio-oil. After repeated uses, the composite catalyst still retained the catalytic properties.
Methods like pyrolysis, gasification, hydrocracking reactions and catalytic cracking can convert vegetable oil into biofuels.5 In recent years, fast pyrolysis has been combined with microwave irradiation which could reduce the energy usage, heat loss and the production cost.6–9 Also, microwave pyrolysis could avoid the undesired second cracking during the long reaction time in conventional pyrolysis.10 However, the limited use of the microwave pyrolysis of biomass is owing to the liquid product's low quality such as low heating value, high acidity, thermal instability.11 When microwave pyrolysis combines with catalyst, the additional upgrading process can overcome these problems. At the same time, different catalyst presence different selectivity which can varies the composition of the product.5 Scientific literatures have been reported that the mesoporous molecular sieves (MCM41) possess a large surface areas and uniform hexagonal channel arrangement which can provide more accessible reaction sites in contrast with microporous molecular zeolites (HZSM-5).12,13 Researchers found that the MCM41 which is the mesoporous catalyst with relatively large pores and mild acidity can crack the large oxygenated compounds into small molecules.14,15
In this study, a composite catalyst of the MCM41 coating on the SiC foam ceramics (SiC) is developed to applied in the microwave-assisted pyrolysis. Owing to silicon carbide's stable tetrahedral structure constructed by carbon and silicon atom, it is not easy to load metal active components, the development of serving silicon carbide as catalyst and catalyst support was limited. After studying the zeolite membrane's characteristic and new processes of preparing porous SiC, an attractive method was put forward – forming the mesoporous molecular sieve on the surface of the porous SiC support – this composite catalyst contains both the catalysis, adsorption, selection of 1 the molecular sieve and the chemical stability, good thermal conductivity, high mechanical strength of the silicon carbide.16–18 In our previous study, the SiC performed the function of promoting the yield of aromatics in bio-oil.19 Both SiC and MCM41 decreased the yield of the pyrolysis oil and increased the gas product.20 Combining these two kinds of catalysts, how the composite catalyst will affect the product distribution and the composition of liquid product is worth to investigate.
The objectives of this paper were to synthesis the SiC-MCM41 composite catalyst and investigate the effect of the catalyst on the product distribution and the composition of liquid product during the microwave pyrolysis. The composite catalyst SiC-MCM41 was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) technologies. The influence of the type of catalyst, the catalytic temperature and the ratio of catalyst to feed on the mass yield and the characteristics of pyrolysis oil were investigated. The chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to determine the chemical composition and the functional group changes of the pyrolysis oil. The variation of the yield and the chemical composition of the pyrolysis oil would be compared to exam the stability of the catalyst after repeated use.
| Name | Molecular formula | Area% |
|---|---|---|
| Linoleic | C18H32O2 | 34.26 |
| Oleic | C18H34O2 | 25.25 |
| Palmitic | C16H32O2 | 23.91 |
| Linolenic | C18H30O2 | 16.67 |
First, the SiC foam ceramics was calcined in the muffle furnace in 550 °C calcination for 4 h to form a densified membrane on the surface.
According to the mole ratio of 1 tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS, 28%, Damao Chemical reagent plant)/0.2 hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTMAB, 99%, Aladdin)/160 deionized water, a precursor gel was prepared. The above mentioned amount of hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide is dissolved in water, then the tetraethylorthosilicate solution slowly drip into the hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide in aqueous solution, stirring for 5 minutes to mixing well. Using sodium hydroxide solution (0.5 mol L−1) to adjust pH to 10, stirring until white precipitation appeared, the crystallization period took about 15 min.
The calcined SiC foam ceramics and precursor gels are mixed at 1
:
1 by mass fraction, the mixture was transferred into the Teflon reaction kettle and closed, the Microwave MDS-6G (SINEO) reactor first heated with a heating rate of 5 °C min−1 and then kept the temperature of 100 °C for 90 minutes. The microwave synthesizer has a frequency of 2450 MHz and an output power of 1800 W.
After the synthesis reaction, the composite catalysts were cooled at room temperature, filtered, washed to neutral with distilled water, and placed in the oven in 120 °C for 12 h to dry volatile matter. After drying, unburned samples was calcined in the muffle furnace 550 °C for 6 h. During calcinations, mesoporous material undergoes further condensation, CTAB and polymer are removed. The same procedure was applied to synthesis MCM41 except the addition of SiC to investigate the catalysis of the MCM41. In order to distinguish between composite catalysts and physically mixed catalysts, SiC-MCM41 is used to represent composite catalysts and SiC/MCM41 is used to represent physically mixed catalysts. The loading rate determined the mixing weight of MCM41 and SiC for physical mixed catalysts.
XRD measurements were performed by a multi-function X-ray diffractometer (BEDE/D1) in the range of 2θ from 1° to 80° with a scanning step of 5° min−1 which was used to measure the characteristic peaks of different catalysts and physical phase retrieval of composite catalyst. The BET were acquired using BK132F to obtain the specific surface area, pore volume and pore diameter of different catalysts. The SEM images were collected on JSM-6701F (JEOL) and the microstructure like morphology and the surface structure of the SiC and the composite catalyst can be observed. Due to the unconductivity of silicon carbide, the catalyst was pretreated with gold coating. For the better observing of the surface morphology of catalysts, we chose the magnification factor of 35, 500, 5000, 10
000.
XRD patterns of three different catalysts were shown in Fig. 2. From the picture, when 2θ is larger than 10°, almost no peaks were observed in MCM41, however, there are more than four diffraction peaks (1.92°, 3.78°, 4.17°, 5.97°, 6.42°) in the small angle area, which are agree with the characteristic of MCM41.24,25 The XRD pattern of the SiC exhibits the characteristic peaks at 35.6°, 60.0° and 71.7° which were also found in SiC-MCM41. Also, the peaks (4.17°, 5.97°, 6.42°) were found in the small angle area of the SiC-MCM41 which indicates the composite catalyst compounded well.
SEM shows the surface morphology of the SiC and the composite catalyst. From the Fig. 3 and 4, it can be observed that the surface of silicon carbide appeared regular pattern at 10
000 times magnification while the surface of the composite catalyst was covered with massive MCM41. As the magnification decreased, the surface of silicon carbide gradually became smooth which was different with the composite catalyst. The composite catalyst can clearly observe the massive MCM41 at the 35 times magnification.
Table 2 shows the specific surface area, pore volume and pore diameter of different catalysts obtained by BET experiment. From the table, we can conclude that the pore diameter of MCM41 (3.777 nm) meets the mesoporous material standard that its pore diameter was between 2 and 50 nm. The pore volume of the composite catalyst was similar to that of MCM41, both of which were around 0.2 cm3 g−1 while the pore diameter was closer to the SiC (34.452). The specific surface area of MCM41, SiC and SiC-MCM41 were 290.760, 2.250 and 17.623, respectively. These results showed that the composite catalyst was well developed and contained the properties of two catalysts.
| Catalysts | Specific surface area (m2 g−1) | Pore volume (cm3 g−1) | Pore diameter (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCM41 | 290.760 | 0.241 | 3.777 |
| SiC | 2.250 | 0.028 | 34.089 |
| SiC-MCM41 | 17.623 | 0.206 | 34.452 |
:
1. The effects of using different catalysts on product yield were presented in Fig. 5(a). As shown in Fig. 5(a), the addition of catalyst in the pyrolysis period decreased the bio-oil production and increased the gas production at a variable extent. Yu et al.25 has demonstrated that the mesoporous materials could promote the formation of gas and decreased the yield of liquid and char. Compared with no-catalyst, the production of bio-oil decreased from 79.31% to 63.99% while the production of gas increased from 17.13% to 30.44%, and the production of coke and tar increased slightly. The SiC catalyst and composite catalyst also showed similar catalytic results, but the catalytic decomposition was not as obvious as MCM41. This phenomenon appeared mainly due to more condensable oil vapors were converted into non-condensable gases under the catalysis of MCM41, more active substances were changed into hydrocarbons and carbon oxides which matches with the findings before.26,27 The yield of bio-oil, char, coke, gas under the catalysis of SiC were 71.5%, 3.71%, 0.76% and 24.03% respectively. In addition, Yu et al. have illuminated that the SiC catalysis could change the product composition by secondary cleavage in external heating jacket.19 Compared with non-catalyzed production of bio-oil, the bio-oil yield of SiC-MCM41 catalyzed decreased by 4.52% and the gas yield increased by 3.31%. Notably, there was no synergistic effect on the product yield under the catalysis of composite catalyst. However, the high yield of bio-oil under composite catalysis is satisfactory. The yield of bio-oil, char, coke, gas under the catalysis of SiC/MCM41 were 73.4%, 3.71%, 0.87% and 21.6% respectively. The product distribution of the mixed catalysts was quiet similar to that of SiC-MCM41.
To explore the effect of catalytic temperature on the SiC-MCM41 composite catalyst's effect, the catalyst to feedstock ratio was set as 2
:
1. Product distribution under different catalytic temperature (300 °C, 350 °C, 400 °C, 450 °C, and 500 °C) is illustrated in Fig. 5(b). The bio-oil production fluctuates between 70 and 80%, which is similar to the result of Xu et al.28 With the further increasing of the catalytic temperature, the bio-oil yield decreased from 76.28% to 69.25% and the gas yield increased from 17.52% to 25.98%. This phenomenon appeared because the increasing of the secondary cracking which facilitate the conversion from pyrolysis oil into incoagulable gas.29 The coke reduced from 2.27% to 1.18%. According to the report of Duan et al.,30 higher catalytic temperatures promote the decomposition of the long chain hydrocarbons and phenolic compounds, thus the number of the large molecules decreased and the light compound formed. In addition, the yield of char fluctuated but remained relatively stable. This result is consistent with the study reported by Fan et al.31 It explained the phenomenon that the char yield mainly was affected by the pyrolysis temperature but not catalytic temperature.
Effects of various catalyst to feed ratios (2
:
1, 3
:
2, 1
:
1, 2
:
3, 1
:
2) on the product distribution were investigated. Catalytic temperatures were kept at 400 °C. It can be observed that the char yield first gradually increased and reached its maximum 5.41% at the ratio of 1
:
1, because the pyrolysis vapors passed through the pores of catalyst particles and the carbonization reactions taken place.32 By further observation, the bio-oil yield reduced (from 74.79% to 61.15%) and the gas yield increased (from 19.44% to 32.208%) with the increasing of the catalyst ratio, this phenomenon occurred because more catalyst aided the bio-oil cracking into gaseous compounds thus caused variation trend.30 During the ex situ pyrolysis process, a small amount of the coke (3.51–0.96%) was obtained. With the decreasing of the catalyst to feedstock ratio, formation of the coke was hindered, because higher catalyst to feedstock ratio provided more locations for pyrolysis vapors to deposit on the catalyst.33
The effect of catalytic temperature on the chemical selectivity was conducted and described in Fig. 6(b). It can be observed that the C12+ hydrocarbons and mono-aromatics decreased 4.63% and 15.67% respectively while the C5–C12 hydrocarbons increased from 20.31% to 32.43% when the temperature increased from 250 °C to 400 °C. This phenomenon happened mainly due to higher catalytic temperature facilitate the conversion from long carbon chain substance to gasoline fraction.34 Interestingly, the C5–C12 hydrocarbons decreased 12.06%, the mono-aromatics increased 5.21% and the poly-aromatics increased 2.37% when the temperature increased from 400 to 500 °C. With further enhanced catalytic temperature, the bonds of long-chain hydrocarbons broken and short-chain hydrocarbons generated such as light olefin which are reactants for the Diels–Alder reaction, thus the aromatics increased. Fan et al.26 also found that the pyrolysis further enhanced with the higher catalytic temperature, resulting the decomposition of the C5–C12 hydrocarbons and the formation of aromatics, which was different from the result we obtained at present. This mainly was due to the different selectivity of different catalyst. At the same time, an increasing catalytic temperature improved the formation of oxygen-containing substances, which increased from 11.94 to 21.96%. However, we choose 400 °C as the optimal temperature because both the C12+ hydrocarbons and mono-aromatic appeared a turning point and the highest yield of C5–C12 hydrocarbons was obtained at this condition.
Fig. 6(c) shows the detailed chemical distribution for aromatic and hydrocarbons obtained from the catalytic pyrolysis at different catalyst to feed ratio. From the picture, when the catalyst to feed ratio increased from 1
:
2 to 2
:
1, the oxygen-containing compounds gradually decreased from 19.24% to 10.843%. Conclusion could be drawn that with increasing of the catalyst ratio, the deoxygenation reaction enhanced during the pyrolysis. This phenomenon happened because the composite catalyst conserved the catalysis of MCM41 which is consistent with the study before.15 The mono-aromatics increased from 41.10% to 55.23% because the Sapium sebiferum kernel oil contains lots of unsaturated fatty acids which facilitate the cracking of carbonic chain, cycling reactions, therefore caused a subsequent aromatization and the increase of aromatics.24 The poly-aromatics increased from 2.98% to 10.31% initially like the mono-aromatics. However it decreased to 6.46% at the ratio of 2
:
1 mainly due to the strong ability of cracking carbon bonds. The C5–C12 hydrocarbons content first decreased to 20.94% at the ratio of 1
:
1, this mainly because the aromatization was more intense than bond breaking reaction. At the ratio of 2
:
1, the C5–C12 hydrocarbons have risen to 24.66%. This reflects that the carbon chain rupture enhanced with increasing catalyst. On the other hand, the C12+ hydrocarbons first increased from 4.80% to 7.93%, then deceased to 2.81% at the catalyst to feed ratio of 2
:
1. Results show that the C12+ hydrocarbons represent the contrary tendency of C5–C12 hydrocarbons which is a side validation of our view.
:
3, the peaks area at 1710 cm−1 and 1290 cm−1 were larger than other groups which indicated that there were more oxygen-containing compounds in bio-oil. Instead, the bio-oil under the catalyst to feed ratio of 1
:
2 showed outstanding advantages in peaks aforementioned.
| Functional group | Wave range (cm−1) | Wave number (cm−1) |
|---|---|---|
| Aliphatic C–H stretching | 3000–2800 | 2925, 2856 |
C O carbonyl group |
1850–1660 | 1710 |
| Aromatic C–C ring stretching | 1600, 1580, 1500, 1450 | 1460 |
| C–O stretching | 1300–1000 | 1290 |
:
2. The composite catalyst was used nine times continuously without baking activation. Fig. 8(a) shows the variation of the product distribution after 9 times use. From the picture, it is obvious that the product distribution is stable after multiple uses. The yield of the bio-oil floated between 72% and 75% while the difference between maximum and minimum gas production is only 3.53%. The yield of coke and char were basically stable at 1% and 3.5% respectively. As for the bio-oil composition, some changes can be observed in the Fig. 8(b). It is interesting that the oxygen-containing compound decreased from 20.93% to 9.613% after 7 times use which confirmed that the deoxidization performance of catalyst was enhanced. At the same time, the mono-aromatics and the poly-aromatics both increased 21.06% and 8.36% respectively while the C5–C12 hydrocarbons deceased from 37.14% to 24.42% after 7 times use. We consider that after several times, the small molecules blocked the MCM41 pore, but the catalysts were not activated by torrefaction. However, the extraordinary the thermal stability of the SiC appeared. The components of bio-oil were increasingly similar to that under SiC catalysis alone especially the proportion of mono-aromatics. At the ninth use, the catalytic effect tends to be stable. But it appeared higher C5–C12 hydrocarbons (24.79%), C12+ hydrocarbons (5.75%) and less polyaromatics (10.60%) in contrast with the group of only SiC catalyzes.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 8 Sustainability of catalyst (a) product yields variation with SiC-MCM41 after repeated use; (b) bio-oil composition with SiC-MCM41 variation after repeated use. | ||
:
2, 32.43% C5–C12 hydrocarbons and 41.10% mono-aromatics were obtained. The FTIR shows the variation in the amount of functional groups which is consistent with the results of GCMS. Furthermore, the sustainability of catalyst appeared well after several times use which retained the catalytic property.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 |