Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Fluorescent perylene derivative functionalized titanium oxide gel for sensitive and portable ascorbic acid detection

Binbin Zhang, Wenxia Liu, Yihao Liu, Zhiguang Suo, Lingyan Feng*, Feifei Xing* and Shourong Zhu
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Materials Genome Institute, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received 4th March 2019 , Accepted 30th June 2019

First published on 8th August 2019


Abstract

An inorganic titanium oxide (TiO) gel sensor was demonstrated for convenient detection of ascorbic acid (AA). It is composed of TiO (PI–TiO) functionalized with a perylene diimide derivative containing carboxylic groups as a new soft dopant material. A traditional solvothermal reaction is adopted to prepare the PI–TiO composite, which exhibits a different spectrum according to the reaction time. The final gel possesses a strong chelating affinity with AA molecules, in which phenol hydroxyl groups are shown to compete with those already present in PI. We further utilize the functionalized gel to prepare a series of films with a simple and portable AA response. A visual colour variation can be recognized by the naked eye, together with obvious fluorescence changes for selective and sensitive AA detection. Finally, the as-prepared gel film displays good stability and reproducibility for real sample responses with satisfying results.


1 Introduction

Gels are widely used for biosensors, drug delivery carriers and different stimuli-responsive operations, etc.1–3 Compared with the well-researched polymer gels, inorganic gels have some unique advantages, such as the low toxicity of precursor materials and ease of preparation. They are considered as a new choice for hybrid gel materials in thin film, nano- and porous materials fabrication.4,5 To complement its optical function, previous research has entrapped perylene dye in various inorganic gels, such as silica matrix gels, to obtain sensitive photofluorochromic perylene doped gels.6,7 One novel perylene–TiO gel has been recently reported with strong fluorescence properties given by coordinative interactions between titanium alkyloxide with the carboxylic groups (–COOH) of perylene tetracarboxylic acid (PTCA).8 In composite materials, TiO acts as an efficient wet matrix and photoactive shelter for perylene dye.

Notably, PTCA molecule is insoluble in many solvents (e.g., ethanol and ethyl acetate) and is only soluble in strong basic aqueous solution originating from perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic dianhydride.9 By comparison, perylene diimide derivatives (PI) have excellent advantages of solubility, chemical/photothermal stability and high quantum yield, which are important for molecular probes and their applications.10,11 Carboxylic groups are also easily introduced on perylene compounds at the imide or bay positions, increasing the whole molecular solubility.12–15 Due to the presence of carboxyl substituents, interactions between PI and TiO are expected, making a hybrid composite with unique optical properties.8 However, few works have reported entrapping PI dyes in TiO gels, and still no application has been discussed to utilize the interesting phenomenon of a fluorescent functionalized gel, especially for sensor development.

Ascorbic acid (AA) is a necessary compound in maintaining normal growth of the human body. It has important influence on many aspects of life activities, such as a lower risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke and cancer, and increased longevity.16 Traditional methods for AA detection include redox titration, HPLC,17 electrochemical detection18 and so on. Different methods have their strengths, but also some limitations. For example, the redox titration method to determine the chromogenic reaction is often slow, unstable and lacks sensitivity; the error of test results is relatively large.19 HPLC and electrochemical methods are usually sensitive enough, but they often need expensive instruments, as well as tedious experimental procedures.20–22 Compared with those methods, optical detection has several advantages, which are high sensitivity and convenience, and that direct colour changes in some systems can be visually observed by the naked eye. It is also vital to design portable AA sensors for potential point-of-care testing (POCT) uses.23

Here we develop one novel PI–TiO gel sensor for highly sensitive and selective AA detection, the principle for which is based on the stronger interaction between TiO and contiguous phenol hydroxyl groups in AA than with the –COOH groups, quenching PI fluorescence efficiently. The inorganic gel-based biosensor is also portable, prepared on simple glass substrate, and so visual colour and fluorescence changes can be obtained conveniently. The detection process is shown in Scheme 1. The prepared PI–TiO gel was easily spread on a clean glass substrate, with high FL emission under a 365 nm ultraviolet lamp. When AA solution was dropped onto the gel surface, the optical intensity immediately decreased depending on the AA concentration. The optical change was ascribed to the competitive binding of AA with titanium which promotes the disassembly of the PI–TiO complex. Controlled experiments demonstrate that the established gel method has high sensitivity and selectivity for AA, different from other analogous molecules. Since the 365 nm lamp is inexpensive compared with other complicated instruments, the gel substrate is also stable enough for portable applications.


image file: c9ra01621j-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Schematic diagram of PI–TiO gel on glass for AA detection using a portable UV lamp.

2 Experimental

2.1 Chemicals and characterization

All analytically pure reagents, Ti{OCH(CH3)2}4 (99%), 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA), 5-aminoisophthalic acid (98%), imidazole (ACS reagent, 99%), etc., and solvents were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. 1H NMR spectra were carried out using a Bruker AVANCE 500 MHz spectrometer. Emission and absorption spectra were collected using a PERSEE TU-1950 UV-visible spectrophotometer and an Edinburgh Instruments FS5 fluorescence spectrometer. The fluorescence light source was provided by 150 W xenon lamp and the fluorescence signal was amplified by a R982P photomultiplier tube. 360 nm was selected as the excitation wavelength, and the scan slit was 1.5 nm. Step was set at 2 nm and wavelength accuracy is ±0.5 nm. The detector sensitivity is >6000[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1. FT-IR spectra were observed as KBr pellets on a Thermo Fisher Nicolet iS50 spectrometer. The morphologies of the resulting films were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, ZEISS Sigma500). Room temperature X-ray diffraction data were obtained using a Bruker D2 phaser desktop X-ray diffractometer. Thermal analysis was conducted using a NETZSCH STA 2500 Regulus simultaneous thermal analyzer. The samples were heated under a nitrogen stream of 20 mL min−1, with a heating rate of 20 °C min−1. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were recorded using a Thermo Fisher Scientific WSCALAB spectrometer.

2.2 Synthesis of perylene diimide derivative (PI)

The perylene diimide derivative with four carboxylic acid groups (PI) was synthesized as reported previously.24 Briefly, PTCDA (0.50 g), 5-aminoisophthalic acid (0.51 g) and imidazole (5.00 g) were heated at 130 °C for 12 hours under a nitrogen atmosphere. Then, the deep red solution was acidified with 2 M HCl to about pH = 2, and a red precipitate was obtained. Centrifugation, water washing and ethanol washing were performed three times, after that the product was dried at 80 °C in a vacuum oven to obtain 0.916 g of deep red powder (yield: 91.8%).

2.3 Synthesis of the PI–TiO composite

The PI–TiO composite was prepared from titanium isopropoxide and a minute quantity of PI in ethanol by a solvothermal method. In a typical procedure, 2.0 mL of titanium tetraisopropanolate (Ti(OR)4) was dissolved in 4.0 mL of ethanol at room temperature, 1.0 mg of PI was added, and then the mixture was stirred then transferred into a 10 mL Teflon-lined autoclave at 40 °C for 6 hours (alterable). The resulting solutions were purified by filtration to remove tiny insoluble impurities, giving a clear solution.

2.4 Synthesis of the PI–TiO gel

In order to control the reaction, the target product was prepared by a typical sol–gel method, and a PI–TiO solution was used as a precursor. Acetic acid (0.05 mL, 98%) was added to the PI–TiO solution (5 mL) at a constant stirring rate at room temperature. Deionized water (0.075 mL) was added drop-by-drop with continuous stirring, and pH was adjusted to 3 by HCl. PI–TiO gel was obtained after letting it rest at room temperature overnight. To prepare the PI–TiO film on glass, fresh PI–TiO sol was directly transferred to a glass dropper and dripped onto a pretreated clean glass sheet. Under normal barometric pressure, ambient temperature 20 °C and humidity ∼60%, the film was evaporated.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Preparation of the PI–TiO solution and gel

PI with four carboxylic acid groups was synthesized as described in the Experimental section.25 Scheme 2 shows the chemical structure of PI and the solvothermal synthesis of the PI–TiO solution. PI can be dissolved easily in the Ti(OR)4–ethanol solution by gentle thermal treatment, since the acidolysis reaction occurs as previously reported.26,27
image file: c9ra01621j-s2.tif
Scheme 2 (a) Synthesis and chemical structure of PI and (b) synthesis of PI–TiO solution.

At first, the colour of the dissolved solution is light yellow. Once the solvothermal reaction time has passed, the colour turns a dark yellow (Fig. 1a). After different lengths of time (1.5 h, 6.0 h and 24 h), the colour appears quite different without an obvious relationship. Time varies the colour of the solution due to the reaction of different quantities of PI and Ti(OR)4. The corresponding fluorescence colours of the PI–TiO solution are obviously green, orange and yellow; the latter with a 24 h reaction time possesses the brightest fluorescence performance (Fig. 1b). A transparent PI–TiO gel was further obtained from the PI–TiO solution using a sol–gel method at 40 °C.28 By carefully adjusting the pH value to 3, it became a glue-like state at room temperature overnight. As shown in Fig. 1c, we can obtain different PI–TiO gels at the corresponding reaction times in solution. The whole gel is green after 1.5 h reaction time, a brown-yellow gel forms for the 6 h solution, and finally a bright yellow PI–TiO gel was obtained for the 24 h solution. On aging, the PI–TiO gel slowly becomes a dry, reddish glue to the naked eye with the volatilization of the solvent (Fig. 1d).


image file: c9ra01621j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Photographs of the PI–TiO solutions prepared over different times (left 1.5 h, center 6 h, right 24 h) with different colours at (a) the naked eye and (b) fluorescence, (c) different fluorescence emissions of the corresponding gels, (d) the reddish dry glue after volatilization, and (e) time-traced normalized fluorescence spectra of the PI–TiO solution after 1.5 h (black line), 6 h (red line) and 24 h (yellow line).

The colour changes and different fluorescent emissions were due to the PI molecule assembly behavior along with the reaction time, as shown in Fig. 1e. At the beginning of the reaction, the peak is strong around 530 nm and the form of perylene monomer is green. With an increase in reaction time, the emergence of a new peak at 580 nm is more obvious. Perylene derivatives have colour changes and fluorescence changes ascribed to the continuous aggregation of molecules.29,30 The aggregated state of molecules will form as the reaction time increases due to the interaction between molecules, finally, yellow fluorescence appears after 24 h reaction time.6,8

3.2 Characterization of the PI–TiO gel

We further conducted detailed characterization of the as-prepared PI–TiO gel. Ti, C and O elements were found in the gel powder via EDS analysis, and their content is shown in Fig. 2a. Because hydrochloric acid is used during gelation, there is also a very small amount of Cl element. The SEM diagram of the gel powder shows the surface morphology of the aggregated TiO nanoparticles (Fig. 2b–c). XRD results (Fig. S1) for the PI–TiO gel show that the gel is amorphous, and the two weak peaks at (101) and (004) are ascribed to anatase peaks of TiO. Further XPS results were obtained to demonstrate the valence bond states, as shown in Fig. 2d–f. The abscissa is binding energy (eV) and the ordinate is relative intensity. The peaks at 458.1 eV and 463.9 eV correspond to Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2 in TiO, respectively (Fig. 2d), while the peak at 529.6 eV corresponds to oxygen in the TiO composite (Fig. 2e). The conjugated carbon of the perylene was also clearly detected at 284.2 eV, and the carboxyl carbon is displayed at 288.4 eV (Fig. 2f).31,32
image file: c9ra01621j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) EDS analysis of the precipitate confirms that it contains Ti, O, C and Cl. (b and c) SEM images of the gel powder at different scales, and (d–f) XPS results for the PI–TiO dry gel; (d) Ti 2p, (e) O 1s and (f) C 1s.

The UV spectrum of the dry gel shows a broad absorption around 480–540 nm, which proves the existence of perylene (Fig. 3a). Infrared (IR) spectroscopy can help us better understand the state of organic molecules doped in inorganic materials. Three different samples, pure TiO dry gel, PI and PI–TiO dry gel, were characterized using IR (Fig. 3b). The carboxylic acid peak of PI appears at 1700 cm−1 (red) and the peaks shift to about 1536 and 1438 cm−1 in the PI–TiO gel for the perylene ring νC[double bond, length as m-dash]C and νC–N stretching vibrations, respectively (black). The red shift is due to the coordination of the metal-carboxylic group, meaning that the PI is chelated inside the PI–TiO gel. The formed Ti–O–C bond is indicated by the vibration peak around 1045 cm−1, between the –COOH and Ti(IV).8,33 As mentioned in Scheme 2b, PI reacts with the Ti(OR)4 agent, forming a PI–TiO compound.


image file: c9ra01621j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 UV-vis absorption (a) and FTIR spectra (b) of the pure TiO dry gel, PI and the PI–TiO dry gel.

Fig. S2 shows the thermogravimetric analysis (TG) curves for different degrees of solvent volatilization to form dry gel. The gel begins to lose solvent at room temperature, the curve drops sharply at 200 °C, and then loses weight at about 380 °C. At this time, the dry gel gradually transforms into anatase. Because only a small amount of PTCA is input, the TG curves do not display an obvious perylene peak (benzene decomposition temperature is close to 600 °C).

3.3 Turn-off fluorescent detection of AA

Although we can get three kinds of PI–TiO gels with different colors by adjusting the reaction time, the fluorescence of the green and orange gels is comparably weak. Therefore, we directly chose the yellow PI–TiO gel after 24 h reaction time in the subsequent AA tests. The absorption and fluorescence of AA titration were firstly carried out using PI–TiO solution in quartz cuvettes. As illustrated in Fig. 4a, upon addition of AA in increased amounts, the absorbance of PI–TiO at the 490 nm and 525 nm peaks increased gradually. According to the literature,34 perylene compounds are highly likely to aggregate due to the π–π interactions of conjugated aromatic rings or intermolecular forces. The ratio of the absorption at 525 and 490 nm (A0–0/A0–1) indicates different aggregation states of perylene compounds. When A0–0/A0–1 ≤ 0.7, it exists mainly in the form of aggregates; when A0–0/A0–1 is approximately 1.6, only the monomer form dominates. The ratio varies between these two values according to the aggregation states. When the concentration of AA increases, A0–0/A0–1 of PI–TiO decreases gradually from 0.91 to 0.58, indicating that AA concentration is conducive to the formation of PI aggregates.15 Correspondingly the fluorescence intensities at 542 nm and 578 nm were quenched linearly when AA was gradually added (Fig. 4b). Relative changes in fluorescence are more obvious than for UV measurements, so we then took the peaks around 542 nm for quantitative calculations. Fig. S3 presents the quantitative behavior of the portable PI–TiO luminescence quenching at 542 nm. A detection limit of 18.0 μM was calculated at 3σ/S, with a linear range between 0 and 0.2 mmol L−1 AA (R2 = 0.99). With the addition of AA amount, it was noticed that the PI–TiO colour gradually deepened from yellow to brown (Fig. 4c). Upon irradiation with the 365 nm UV lamp, the bright yellow fluorescence was slowly quenched under ultraviolet light in the presence of AA (Fig. 4d).
image file: c9ra01621j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 UV/vis absorption spectra (a), fluorescence spectra (Ex = 360 nm, scan slit = 1.5 nm) (b) and photographs of PI–TiO solution with AA solution gradually added (1.5 mM) under natural light (c) and under 365 nm light (d).

We further conducted solid fluorescence tests by fixing the gel on a solid holder to confirm the gel phenomenon changes (Fig. S4). The location of the two peaks of the PI–TiO gel is like that of the previous solution peak. Once 2 μL of AA solution (300 μM) was dripped onto the gel with a pipette, the gel fluorescence intensity was quenched to less than half the original intensity. A second 2 μL of the AA solution (300 μM) caused the whole gel fluorescence to be almost quenched. Later, the gel was cast on a glass plate to prepare a detection film (around 1 cm2). To the naked eye, the film is white, and a bright fluorescence emission of the gel film can be observed under a 365 UV lamp. Also, once the AA aqueous solution is dropped onto the film, the colour of the gel film changes from white to yellow, and the fluorescence emission is completely inhibited by the AA aqueous solution. These optical change phenomena on the film can be explained by the strong ligand transition of metal charge transfer.35 It is well known that Ti(IV) can easily form complexes with oxygen atoms on various oxygen-containing ligands.36

3.4 Detection principle and AA selectivity

To fully prove the binding principle, we conducted various control experiments. As shown in Fig. 5, AA could completely inhibit the fluorescence emission of the PI–TiO films. Other organic acids at the same concentration, such as citric acid (CA), tartaric acid (TA) and oxalic acid (OA), have little effect on fluorescence emission. Also B12 vitamins and aromatic amines cannot quench the fluorescence emission of the PI–TiO film, as well as some other common amino acids. Interestingly, although the fluorescence of an aqueous solution of PI can be quenched by Al3+, Cu2+ and Pb2+, the PI–TiO obtained by a sol–gel method will not be affected by these, indicating a stronger binding ability of Ti(IV) with PI.37 The glass substrate with PI–TiO gel on surface is stable for transfer during the experimental processes.
image file: c9ra01621j-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Fluorescence response of the film to aqueous solutions of different compounds at the same concentration (150 μM) (abbreviations: ascorbic acid, AA; benzoic acid, BA; ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, EDTA; para-phenylenediamine, PPD; melamine, MA; phenol, POH; oxalic acid, OA; citric acid, CA; tartaric acid, TA; vitamin B12, VB12; glucose, Glc; cysteine, Cys; aspartic acid, Asn; alanine, Ala; tyrosine, Tyr).

Selectivity is supposed to be due to the competitive coordination of PI and AA with TiO. Titanium in TiO can bind with AA to form ascorbic acid titanium (Ti(IV)–AA), which is yellow (or reddish brown). The coordination between PI and titanium oxide decreases, and the fluorescence of PI–TiO is destroyed by the new complex Ti(IV)–AA. The bidentate binding of AA with anionic oxygen as an electron donor via two ene-diolate oxygen atoms is most likely because it results in a chelating ring structure, which provides increased stability. Furthermore, the five-membered ring structure has an advantageous angle configuration for atoms on the Ti surface, and the distortion of bond angle and distance is very small.38 The binding affinity increases with the phenolic hydroxyl groups in AA rather than the –COOH groups in PI. Also, the glycolic side chain of AA does not seem to be involved in the formation of complexes.35 An IR spectrogram was obtained to compare the characteristic absorption peaks of the PI–TiO gel before and after AA addition. As shown in Fig. S5 and 3b, the carboxylic acid peak of PI returned from 1536 cm−1 in PI–TiO to 1625 cm−1 after AA addition, indicating that the coordination of carboxylic groups with Ti(IV) was successfully destroyed. Another new peak at 580 cm−1confirmed the existence of Ti–O bonds, due to the coordination of Ti with hydroxyl groups in ascorbic acid.38 It is said not all four of the carboxyl groups in PI were coordinated, and that some of these may be esterified.8

In order to further prove the coordination effect between phenolic hydroxyl groups and Ti(IV), other compounds containing phenol hydroxyl groups, such as phenol, pyrocatechol and 1,2,3-benzenetriol solutions, were checked for their optical changes on PI–TiO gel film. As shown in Fig. 6, the fluorescence is also quenched by pyrocatechol and 1,2,3-benzenetriol solutions with a concentration higher than 300 μM, while phenol can also significantly weaken film fluorescence. When the concentration of phenol is upped to 2 mM, film fluorescence quenching occurs. In contrast, we dropped glucose and tartaric acid solutions which contain –OH on the gel film without any change in fluorescence. This is consistent with previous discussion and proves that the strong coordination of the hydroxyl group on the aromatic ring with Ti(IV) causes colour change and fluorescence quenching.38


image file: c9ra01621j-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Fluorescence responses of the PI–TiO film to different hydroxyl-containing compounds at 300 μM and 2 mM ((+) indicates fluorescence on, (−) indicates fluorescence off).

Notably, a series of other perylene fluorescent films for the detection of aniline vapor39,40 and phenol solutions41 have been reported previously. However, these fluorescent perylene films are rarely applied for sensitive and portable AA detection. Considering these compounds with phenolic hydroxyl groups do not usually co-exist with AA, this visualized detection manner is also much more convenient for AA sensing, as well as the present PI–TiO gel system being more economical and easy to prepare.

3.5 Model biological sample analysis

The determinations of model biological samples with PI–TiO gel were performed by adding AA inside bovine serum with a standard addition technique. All serum samples were diluted (10%) before the measurements. In order to ascertain the correctness of the results, AA was detected in the diluted samples at a final concentration of 150 μM. The results are displayed in Fig. 7. It was found that the PI–TiO film may be used for the direct determination of AA in real samples.
image file: c9ra01621j-f7.tif
Fig. 7 (a) Glass plates coated with the gel film. (b) Fluorescence image of the glass plates coated with the gel film. (c) Film covered with AA bovine serum solution. (d) Fluorescence image of the film covered with AA bovine serum solution.

4 Conclusions

In summary, a novel composite material, perylene carboxylate-modified inorganic TiO gel, has been prepared for sensitive and portable AA detection. By adjusting the reaction conditions, a strongly emitting PI–TiO gel can be obtained. During the detection process, inorganic TiO gel is not only used as a wet medium, but more importantly as a fluorescent quenching agent for the detection of AA. The film prepared on glass substrate can be applied as a simple visual colour and fluorescence double sensor for AA detection. Furthermore, the sensing principle and selectivity are carefully discussed and are ascribed to the strong coordination between phenolic hydroxyl groups and Ti(IV). The portable ability of the sensor also has potential for human application in future point-of-care testing.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 21705106), the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning (No. TP2016023), Shanghai Sailing Program (17YF1405700) and Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (No. 18ZR1415400).

References

  1. F. Y. Li, C. Y. Wang and W. W. Guo, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1705876 CrossRef.
  2. Y. Y. Hu, M. X. Xu, Y. R. Liu, X. Y. Xie, W. D. Bao, A. X. Song and J. C. Hao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 1174–1181 CAS.
  3. K. Q. Fan, X. B. Wang, Z. G. Yin, C. J. Jia, B. H. Zhang, L. M. Zhou and J. Song, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2018, 6, 10192–10196 RSC.
  4. P. Yang, H. S. Chen, J. P. Wang, Q. D. Che, Q. Ma, Y. Q. Cao and Y. N. Zhu, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 20358–20363 RSC.
  5. F. Ayari, M. Mhamdi, G. Delahay and A. Ghorbel, J. Porous Mater., 2010, 17, 265–274 CrossRef CAS.
  6. N. Mizoshita, T. Tani and S. Inagaki, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 3350–3355 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. M. Schneider and K. Müllen, Chem. Mater., 2000, 12, 352–362 CrossRef CAS.
  8. P. Wang, Y. Y. Wu, J. Wu, S. Wang, L. Yu, Q. Y. Zhu and J. Dai, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2013, 1, 7973–7978 RSC.
  9. S. Y. Gan, L. J. Zhong, L. F. Gao, D. X. Han and L. Niu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 1490–1493 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. B. Wang and C. Yu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 1485–1488 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. S. H. Bai, L. L. Liang, C. L. Wang, H. F. Mehnane, C. H. Bu, S. J. You, Z. H. Yu, N. Cheng, H. Hu, W. Liu, S. S. Guo and X. Z. Zhao, J. Power Sources, 2015, 280, 430–434 CrossRef CAS.
  12. M. J. Robb, B. Newton, B. P. Fors and C. J. Hawker, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 6360–6365 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. Á. J. Jiménez, M. J. Lin, C. Burschka, J. Becker, V. Settels, B. Engels and F. Würthner, Chem. Sci., 2014, 5, 608–619 RSC.
  14. Y. Avlasevich, C. Li and K. Müllen, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 3814–3826 RSC.
  15. W. X. Liu, Z. G. Suo, Y. H. Liu, L. Y. Feng, B. B. Zhang, F. F. Xing and S. R. Zhu, Aust. J. Chem., 2019, 72, 206–212 CrossRef CAS.
  16. S. J. Padayatty, A. Katz and Y. H. Wang, J. Am. Coll. Nutr., 2003, 22, 18–35 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. R. Kanďár, P. Drábková and R. Hampl, J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., 2011, 879, 2834–2839 CrossRef PubMed.
  18. Y. Ma, M. G. Zhao, B. Cai, W. Wang, Z. Z. Ye and J. Y. Huang, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2014, 59, 384–388 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. S. Z. Qureshi, A. Saeed, S. Haque and M. A. Khan, Talanta, 1991, 38, 637–639 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. A. Khan, M. I. Khan, Z. Iqbal, Y. Shah, L. Ahmad, S. Nazir, D. G. Watson, J. A. Khan, F. Nasir, A. Khan and Ismail, Talanta, 2011, 84, 789–801 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. X. Zhang, Y. C. Zhang and L. X. Ma, Sens. Actuators, B, 2016, 227, 488–496 CrossRef CAS.
  22. C. Q. Wang, J. Du, H. W. Wang, C. E. Zou, F. X. Jiang, P. Yang and Y. K. Du, Sens. Actuators, B, 2014, 204, 302–309 CrossRef CAS.
  23. J. Peng, J. Ling, X. Q. Zhang, L. Y. Zhang, Q. E. Cao and Z. T. Ding, Sens. Actuators, B, 2015, 221, 708–716 CrossRef CAS.
  24. P. K. Sukul, D. Asthana, P. Mukhopadhyay, D. Summa, L. Muccioli, C. Zannoni, D. Beljonne, A. E. Rowan and S. Malik, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 11858–11860 RSC.
  25. F. Rigodanza, E. Tenori, A. Bonasera, Z. Syrgiannis and M. Prato, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2015, 23, 5060–5063 CrossRef.
  26. Y. Y. Wu, W. Luo, Y. H. Wang, Y. Y. Pu, X. Zhang, L. S. You, Q. Y. Zhu and J. Dai, Inorg. Chem., 2012, 51, 8982–8988 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. L. Rozes and C. Sanchez, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 1006–1030 RSC.
  28. W. S. Tung and W. A. Daoud, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2009, 1, 2453–2461 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. J. J. Han, A. D. Shaller, W. Wang and A. D. Q. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 6974–6982 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. F. Schlosser, M. Moos, C. Lambert and F. Würthner, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 410–414 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. Q. L. Zhang, L. C. Du, Y. X. Weng, L. Wang, H. Y. Chen and J. Q. Li, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 15077–15083 CrossRef CAS.
  32. P. Taheri, J. R. Flores, F. Hannour, J. H. W. D. Wit, H. Terryn and J. M. C. Mol, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, 3374–3382 CrossRef CAS.
  33. N. Sikdar, D. Dutta, R. Haldar, T. Ray, A. Hazra, A. J. Bhattacharyya and T. K. Maji, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 13622–13629 CrossRef CAS.
  34. Z. M. Cheng, F. F. Xing, Y. L. Bai, Y. M. Zhao and S. R. Zhu, Asian J. Org. Chem., 2017, 6, 1612–1619 CrossRef CAS.
  35. A. P. Xagas, M. C. Bernard, A. H. Goff, N. Spyrellis, Z. Loizos and P. Falaras, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2000, 132, 115–120 CrossRef CAS.
  36. W. Jabs, W. Gaube, C. Fehl and R. Lukowski, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1990, 175, 273 CrossRef CAS.
  37. A. K. Dwivedi, M. Pandeeswar and T. Govindaraju, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 21369–21379 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. L. Zeininger, L. Portilla, M. Halik and A. Hirsch, Chem.–Eur. J., 2016, 22, 13506–13512 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  39. C. Shang, G. Wang, M. He, X. Chang, J. Fan, K. Liu, H. Peng and Y. Fang, Sens. Actuators, B, 2017, 241, 1316–1323 CrossRef CAS.
  40. J. Fan, X. Chang, M. He, C. Shang, G. Wang, S. Yin, H. Peng and Y. Fang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 18584–18592 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. D. H. Zou, P. Wang, W. Luo, J. L. Hou, Q. Y. Zhu and J. Da, Inorg. Chem., 2018, 57, 1623–1629 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9ra01621j

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019