Open Access Article
Ayaka Setoa,
Rika Kajiwaraa,
Jaeeun Songb,
Eeseul Shinb,
Byeong-Su Kim
c,
Hisayoshi Kofujitad,
Yoshiyuki Oishia and
Yuji Shibasaki
*a
aDepartment of Chemistry & Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Iwate University, 4-3-5 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate 020-8551, Japan. E-mail: yshibasa@iwate-u.ac.jp
bDepartment of Chemistry, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 44919, Korea
cDepartment of Chemistry, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
dDepartment of Forest Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, 3-18-8 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate 020-8550, Japan
First published on 8th March 2019
This paper describes the synthesis of long-chain-alkylated poly(arbutin)s (poly(Arb)-Rx, where R = alkyl-chain length and x = degree of substitution (DS)) and their aqueous micelle formation. DS was controlled by tailoring the alkyl reagent/main-chain phenol substituent feed ratio. The critical micelle concentrations (CMCs) of poly(Arb)-Rx were determined as 1.3–5.2 mg mL−1 by the surface tension method. Introduction of longer alkyl substituents decreased CMC and also decreased aqueous solubility. In DLS measurement, the average micelle diameters were 225–616 nm, and micelle size decreased with increasing DS because of increased stabilization by hydrophobic alkyl substituents. Transmission electron microscopy indicated that mainly wormlike cylindrical micelles were formed, even with highly hydrophilic polymers. The alkylated polymer exhibited no cytotoxicity, and their antioxidant abilities were evaluated by the β-carotene bleaching method. Only 0.049 mol equivalents of poly(Arb)-C830 to linoleic acid was sufficient to preserve the β-carotene.
Phenolic compounds such as tyrosine and catechin are ubiquitous in nature and play important roles in the metabolism of living organisms. Among these phenolic compounds, polyphenols such as catechin have attracted significant research attention owing to their strong antioxidant properties and potential anticancer activities.5,6 They also exhibit anticarcinogenic, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties,7 making them of enormous benefit for the prevention of disease.
Amphiphilic block copolymers are useful materials in variety of fields. Especially they can form micelles in a specific solvent, which make it possible to function as a drug carrier.8–10 Numerous efforts have been paid to study the micelle formulation ability and the morphology by the use of various kinds of amphiphilic block copolymers.11–13 Inspired by natural compounds, polyphenol derivatives loaded within synthetic polymer micelles were prepared for anti-cancer reagent14 and dermatitis treatment.15 Encapsulation of polyphenols within casein were also reported as a potential usage as a protein-based delivery systems for incorporating hydrophobic nutraceuticals into fat-free clear beverages.16
As development of novel polyphenol compounds, a number of studies on the enzyme-catalyzed oxidative polymerization of phenol derivatives via C–C or C–O coupling have been published,17–19 and a significant number of studies on the polymerization of βArb have been reported.20–25 Unfortunately, the selectivity of C–C coupling over C–O coupling for βArb systems was found to be generally poor, and the number average molecular weight (Mn) of the resulting polymers was limited to 3200, most likely due to the occurrence of enzyme-catalyzed equilibrium polymerization.
We have recently reported the selective C–C oxidative polymerization of βArb using a conventional copper catalyst in a tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane hydrogen chloride (Tris–HCl, pH = 9.0) buffer solution to give the corresponding poly(Arb) with Mn values reaching 7200.26 This polymer possesses both a phenolic and a glucose component in each repeating unit; therefore, in aqueous media, it can form a structure in which the polyphenol backbone be wrapped in hydrophilic glucose moieties.
Unlike the enzyme-catalyzed polymerization products mentioned above, the poly(Arb) prepared by our chemical oxidative reaction method exhibits relatively high Mn values and near-perfect C–C coupling selectivity, making it suitable for the preparation of antioxidant micelles coated with glucose moieties. Therefore, we envisioned that this polymer would have great potential for biomedical applications.
Accordingly, in an attempt to tailor the hydrophobicity of the micelle cores and thus their macroscopic properties, we investigated the introduction of n-octyl groups to poly(Arb) via SN2 reactions between n-octyl bromide and the phenolic group. However, a degree of substitution (DS) of only 10% was achieved. Nevertheless, we prepared micelles using the resulting polymer and demonstrated that they could be loaded with pyrene.26
Encouraged by these results and our belief that these novel polymers would be useful in various biomedical applications owing to their unique glucose-wrapped polyphenol structures, we attempted to develop a more effective approach toward the preparation of alkylated poly(Arb)s, hereafter termed poly(Arb)-Rx, where R is the length of the substituted alkyl chain and x denotes DS. We also attempted to develop a reliable method for the determination of their critical micelle concentrations (CMCs).
Herein, we report an effective synthetic approach to the poly(Arb)-Rx species involving the addition of alkyl isocyanates (Scheme 1) and the influence of their structures on micelle formation, as indicated by the surface tension method, dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity and antioxidant properties of the alkylated polymers were evaluated using the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and β-carotene bleaching assays, respectively.
Poly(Arb) was then reacted with alkyl isocyanate to give the corresponding poly(Arb)-Rx polymers in NMP in the presence of triethylamine (TEA, 1.2 equiv. to phenolic OH group) as a phenolic proton scavenger at 25 °C for 18 h.
Fig. 1 shows the 1H NMR spectra of (a) Arb, (b) poly(Arb), and (c) poly(Arb)-C810 in DMSO-d6. The feed ratio of octyl isocyanate to the phenolic OH group in poly(Arb) was set to 0.1
:
1, leading to a DS of 7.3% (substitution efficiency 7.3 ÷ 10 × 100 = 73%), as derived from the integration values of the octyl CH3 and aromatic CH protons. Thus, unlike the SN2 reaction using octyl bromide, which had a substitution efficiency of ≈10%, the simple addition used in the current study proceeds in very good efficiency. Therefore, we varied the feed ratio of octyl isocyanate to phenolic group in poly(Arb) from 0.1
:
1 to 0.9
:
1. As shown in 1H NMR spectra (Fig. 6s†), the signal integration of the terminal methyl group at 0.848 ppm increased with increasing the feed ratio, and the calculated DS values showed good agreement with the expected ones calculated from the feed ratio. It should be noticeable that the signal integration assignable to OH moieties in glucose unit observed at around 5 pm is constant to be about 5, indicating the alkylation was selectively occurred at phenolic OH group. Alkylation of poly(Arb) using various alkyl isocyanates for poly(Arb)-Rx samples are summarized in Table 1.
| Run | Polym.a | Yield (%) | Mnb (kDa) | Mw/Mnb | OH in poly(Arb) : RNCO |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feed | DSc | |||||
| a The Mns of the starting poly(Arb)-C8x, poly(Arb)-C12x, and poly(Arb)C3x were 5950, 5950, and 4180, respectively.b Determined by GPC (NMP with LiBr, PSt standards).c Degree of substitution of the OH group calculated by 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6). | ||||||
| 1 | Poly(Arb)-C810 | 63.4 | 6.47 | 1.55 | 1 : 0.10 |
7.3 |
| 2 | Poly(Arb)-C820 | 63.7 | 6.64 | 1.53 | 1 : 0.20 |
20.0 |
| 3 | Poly(Arb)-C830 | 85.5 | 6.50 | 1.54 | 1 : 0.30 |
33.1 |
| 4 | Poly(Arb)-C840 | 68.3 | 6.57 | 1.52 | 1 : 0.40 |
44.3 |
| 5 | Poly(Arb)-C850 | 83.1 | 6.90 | 1.41 | 1 : 0.50 |
54.2 |
| 6 | Poly(Arb)-C870 | 78.6 | 7.11 | 1.38 | 1 : 0.70 |
74.0 |
| 7 | Poly(Arb)-C890 | 70.3 | 7.18 | 1.39 | 1 : 0.90 |
98.7 |
| 8 | Poly(Arb)-C310 | 49.0 | 4.35 | 1.58 | 1 : 0.10 |
11.1 |
| 9 | Poly(Arb)-C330 | 30.9 | 4.53 | 1.56 | 1 : 0.30 |
25.0 |
| 10 | Poly(Arb)-C350 | 57.9 | 4.81 | 1.53 | 1 : 0.50 |
41.9 |
| 11 | Poly(Arb)-C1210 | 61.7 | 6.34 | 1.56 | 1 : 0.10 |
9.8 |
| 12 | Poly(Arb)-C1230 | 47.6 | 7.29 | 1.52 | 1 : 0.30 |
23.1 |
| 13 | Poly(Arb)-C1250 | 66.9 | 7.47 | 1.54 | 1 : 0.50 |
31.3 |
| 14 | Poly(Arb)-C1810 | 65.3 | 7.78 | 1.46 | 1 : 0.10 |
8.4 |
| 15 | Poly(Arb)-C1830 | 75.6 | 8.01 | 1.45 | 1 : 0.30 |
16.0 |
| 16 | Poly(Arb)-C1850 | 78.6 | 8.20 | 1.67 | 1 : 0.50 |
23.2 |
Thus, the DS value is controllable by changing the feed ratio of the reactant, and the Mn value of the finally obtained polymer increases with the DS value consistently. Higher DS values were occasionally observed (e.g., run 7), probably due to the recovery of a low-molecular-weight fraction of poly(Arb)-C890 during the purification process. When the alkylation was conducted using isocyanate having long alkyl chains such as C12 and C18, the resultant DS values were lower than the expected ones (runs 12, 13, 15, and 16). This can be explained that the alkyl isocyanates having long alkyl group have strong hydrophobic compound, and thus immiscible with NMP solvent. Based on these results, we especially targeted the alkylated polymers having relatively low hydrophobic part for the following studies.
Table 2 summarizes the solubility testing results for the poly(Arb)-Rx samples. Essentially, the solubilities of the alkylated polymers are not significantly changed. However, the solubility in water decreases with DS.
| Polymer | DMSO | NMP | THF | Acetone | CHCl3 | MeOH | H2O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a Polymer 10 mg per solvent 5 mL (++ soluble at room temperature; + soluble after heating; ± partially soluble; − insoluble). DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide; DMF: N,N-dimethylformamide; NMP: N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone; THF: tetrahydrofuran; CHCl3: chloroform; MeOH: methanol; H2O: water. | |||||||
| Arb | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | − | ++ | ++ |
| Poly(Arb) | ++ | ++ | − | − | − | − | ++ |
| Poly(Arb)-C810 | ++ | ++ | − | − | − | ± | ++ |
| Poly(Arb)-C830 | ++ | ++ | − | − | − | ± | ++ |
| Poly(Arb)-C850 | ++ | ++ | − | − | − | ± | ++ |
| Poly(Arb)-C870 | ++ | ++ | − | − | − | ± | ++ |
| Poly(Arb)-C890 | ++ | ++ | ± | ± | ± | ± | ± |
Generally, when an amorphous polymer is mixed with a suitable solvent, it completely dissolves in the media by expanding the polymer coil from its unperturbed dimensions to the extent of the liquid–polymer interactions. However, in the case of poly(Arb)-Rx dissolved in water or organic solvents, the interactions will be different owing to the largely amphiphilic nature of the polymers. Consequently, the chain dimensions in these solvents will be different.
Fig. 2 shows the 1H NMR spectra of poly(Arb)-C830 recorded in D2O, DMSO, and mixtures thereof. DMSO is a good solvent for polyphenol units and the pendant glucose units; thus, all the signals appear clearly, as shown in Fig. 2a. Conversely, water is a good solvent only for the glucose moieties; hence, the polymer must transform into a globular form with the glucose moieties on the outer surface, resulting in micelle formation. Owing to the restricted and crowded structure, the signals for the octyl chains and the glucose groups in water are broadened and weaker. Naturally, poly(Arb) itself can adopt a similar structure on mixing with water. However, the poly(Arb)-Rx structures are more stable in water because of interactions between the hydrophobic alkyl substituents in the core.
To further investigate the micelle formation abilities of the polymers, we used surface tension measurements to obtain their CMCs.
| Polym. | OH in poly(Arb) : RNCO |
CMC (mg mL−1) | γc (mN m−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feed | DS | |||
| a Calculated by 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6). | ||||
| Poly(Arb)-C810 | 1 : 0.10 |
7.3 | 4.8 | 55.5 |
| Poly(Arb)-C820 | 1 : 0.20 |
20.0 | 3.3 | 62.0 |
| Poly(Arb)-C830 | 1 : 0.30 |
33.1 | 1.3 | 57.0 |
| Poly(Arb)-C840 | 1 : 0.40 |
44.3 | 2.0 | 58.0 |
| Poly(Arb)-C850 | 1 : 0.50 |
54.2 | 2.2 | 52.0 |
As described in the solubility tests (Table 2), poly(Arb)-C870 and poly(Arb)-C890 both exhibit poor solubility in water; therefore, excess alkylation may endow the polymer with an overly hydrophobic amphiphilic balance.
Fig. 4 shows the relationship between surface tension and concentration for polymers with alkyl substituents from C3 to C18 in DI water. The CMC values decrease from 5.2 to 3.4 mg mL−1 with increasing alkyl-chain length (Table 4). Thus, longer alkyl substituents allow the formation of more stable micelles at lower polymer concentrations owing to their optimal amphiphilic balance. Conversely, there seems to be no relationship between γc and alkyl-chain length. Considering the γc values of polyethylene (γc = 34.4),27 the concentration of alkyl groups (i.e., the DS value) as well as the terminal CH3 group should be considered. However, in our poly(Arb)-Rx samples, the substitution position cannot be fully controlled, and thus the trend in the γc values cannot be properly explained.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 Effect of alkyl substituents on the relationship between surface tension and poly(Arb)-Rx concentration. | ||
| Polym. | OH in poly(Arb) : RNCO |
CMC (mg mL−1) | γc (mN m−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feed | DS | |||
| a Calculated by 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6). | ||||
| Poly(Arb)-C310 | 1 : 0.10 |
11.1 | 5.2 | 61.2 |
| Poly(Arb)-C810 | 1 : 0.10 |
7.3 | 4.8 | 55.5 |
| Poly(Arb)-C1210 | 1 : 0.10 |
9.8 | 3.8 | 57.0 |
| Poly(Arb)-C1810 | 1 : 0.10 |
8.4 | 3.4 | 63.0 |
Fig. 5 shows the results of DLS analysis of the prepared micelles in water. Clearly, for both the C3 and C8 samples, the diameters of the micelles decrease on increasing DS, whereas the size distribution for the C3 sample are broad. Poly(Arb) itself is highly water soluble owing to its hydrophilic glucose moieties, and thus short C3 substituent does not endow it with a sufficiently hydrophobic amphiphilic balance to form monodisperse stable micelles. This is largely because the C3 group is smaller than the glucose pendant, and thus the alkyl substituents cannot effectively aggregate in the core. Therefore, the micelle size distributions for poly(Arb)-C3x are much broader than those for poly(Arb)-C8x. This is also indicated by the lower CMCs of the poly(Arb)-C3x samples, as shown in Table 4.
We used TEM to investigate the micelle morphologies in a dry condition. Fig. 6 shows images of micelles formed by poly(Arb) samples with different R and DS values. Generally, the morphologies of the micelles from amphiphilic block copolymers are primarily a result of their inherent molecular curvature, i.e., the packing parameter p, where p ≤ 1/3 is a spherical micelle, 1/3 ≤ p ≤ 1/2 is a cylindrical micelle, and 1/2 ≤ p ≤ 1 is a vesicle.28 Thus, the primarily hydrophilic poly(Arb)-C310 should form a spherical micelle. However, the micelles of poly(Arb)-C310 are wormlike structures, and some aggregates are observed. Previously, Satoh et al. prepared amphiphilic rigid-rod polyisocyanates with a highly hydrophilic segment, where the morphology of the formed micelle was needlelike instead of typically spherical.29 For the micelles formed from poly(Arb)-C310 and poly(Arb)-C350, thin (13.6 nm in diameter) to thick (63.3 nm in diameter) curled wormlike micelles were observed. However, the micelle morphology clearly changes from thick and wormlike to fiberlike when poly(Arb)-R10 (R = C8, C12, and C18) samples are used. These results can be explained by the fact that poly(Arb)-Rx consists of a rigid-rod polyphenylene main chain, which inhibits the formation of spherical micelles. The micelle diameters measured by DLS are larger than those observed in TEM; therefore the poly(Arb)-Rx polymer assemblies shrinks due to drying TEM condition.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 6 TEM images of (a) poly(Arb)-C310, (b) poly(Arb)-C330, (c) poly(Arb)-C350, (d) poly(Arb)-C810, (e) poly(Arb)-C1210, and (f) poly(Arb)-C1810, and their plausible aggregated structures. | ||
As shown in Fig. 7, regardless of DS of the poly(Arb)-C8x, the cell viability seems gradually decreased with increasing the polymer concentration, but the polymers showed almost no cytotoxicity below the concentration of 0.5 mg mL−1, probably because of the existence of the numerous glucose moieties. Although the polymers do not form micelles in this diluted experimental condition, it can be said that the poly(Arb)-Rx polymer itself is not toxic at all toward the L929 and HeLa cells.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 7 In vitro cell-viability assay results for poly(Arb)-C8x determined by MTT assays using (a) L929 (normal cells) and (b) HeLa (cancer cells). | ||
![]() | ||
| Fig. 8 Monitoring β-carotene (0.0419 μmol; 5 mL) levels in the auto-oxidation of linoleic acid (3.21 μmol; 5 mL) with (a) and without (b) the poly(Arb)-C830 sample (0.157 μmol; 5 mL). | ||
C, Ar), 1705 (C
O, urethane), 2853 (C–H, aliphatic), 2925 (C–H, Ar), 3423 (O–H) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.06 (b, 2.0H, Ar C–H), 5.76–4.34 (b, 5.16H, glucose OH, anomeric C–H), 3.81–3.05 (b, overlapped with H2O, glucose C–H, CH2), 1.38–1.08 (b, 0.98H, octyl CH2), 0.848 (s, 0.22H, octyl CH3) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm) δ 156.15, 119.81, 103.26, 76.88, 76.55, 73.47, 69.47, 60.80, 45.54, 31.26, 28.73, 26.39, 22.12, 13.98, 9.00. Elemental analysis (C16.878H24.130N0.542O7.542) calculated C: 57.06, H: 6.60, N: 2.14 (%); found C: 56.38, H: 7.17, N: 2.54 (%).
Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Scheme 1s, Fig. 1s–10s. See DOI: 10.1039/c8ra09090d |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 |