Nathaniel J.
Clark
,
David
Boyle
,
Benjamin P.
Eynon
and
Richard D.
Handy
*
School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. E-mail: r.handy@plymouth.ac.uk
First published on 24th April 2019
The trophic transfer of silver to fishes in aquatic food chains is a concern, but little is known about the dietary accumulation of pristine (Ag NPs) and modified (Ag2S NPs) forms of silver-containing nanoparticles. The current study aimed to assess the bioaccumulation potential of these materials following dietary exposure to 100 mg kg−1 Ag as either AgNO3, Ag NPs or Ag2S NPs compared to no added Ag controls. The experiment consisted of a 4 week uptake phase, followed by a further 2 weeks on the control diet (total 6 weeks). Fish were sampled for total Ag analysis (weeks 1–4 and 6), plasma ions, biochemistry and histology. The highest Ag concentrations were in the mid intestine, hind intestine, kidney, liver and gallbladder, regardless of the type of silver exposure. Overall, there was significantly more Ag accumulation from AgNO3 and Ag NP exposure compared to the Ag2S NP treatment, indicating a lower bioavailability of the latter. Following the 4 week exposure, the highest Ag concentrations (from AgNO3, Ag NPs and Ag2S NPs, respectively) was in the hind intestine (140, 90, 0.5 μg g−1), liver (120, 130 and 11 μg g−1) and gallbladder (20, 40 and 1 μg g−1). The liver concentration represented around 40% of the body burden of Ag for all Ag treatments. Following the depuration period (week 6), the Ag concentrations in the tissues showed some transient changes. Notably, there was a significant increase in the liver Ag body burden (66, 63 and 99% for AgNO3, Ag NPs and Ag2S NPs, respectively) in the post-exposure phase. An in chemico digestibility assay simulating low pH in the stomach indicated some dissolution of silver, but there were equal orders of Ag release from both the AgNO3 and Ag NP diets, and none from the Ag2S NPs. There were no treatment-dependent differences in cumulative food intake or intestinal morphology, and only minor transient changes in plasma ions, total glutathione and TBARS in the organs. Overall, the dietary bioaccumulation potential of the nano forms of silver was equal to, or less than the metal salt, and with minimal toxicological effects following 4 weeks exposure.
Environmental significanceLittle is known about the trophic transfer of nano silver to fishes in aquatic food chains and there are concerns about dietary accumulation of pristine silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) as well as silver sulphide particles (Ag2S NPs) that are likely the most persist form in the environment. Dietary bioaccumulation of Ag from food containing silver nitrate (AgNO3), Ag NPs, and less from food containing Ag2S NPs, was observed. There was limited clearance of the Ag from the internal organs, indicating a bioaccumulation hazard for the materials. Overall, the dietary bioaccumulation potential of the nano forms of silver was equal to, or less than the metal salt, and without overt toxic effects on the fish. |
The ecological concern is that the propensity of ENMs to settle from the water column will lead to exposure of the sediments and benthic species that comprise the base of food webs; leading to subsequent dietary exposure of higher trophic levels including predatory fish in the water column.7–9 This is an issue for Ag-containing ENMs, but pristine Ag NPs can be transformed in the environment to stable, persistent Ag2S NPs.10–12 Indeed, sulfidation is regarded as the primary transformation of Ag NPs during wastewater treatment,13 such that Ag2S NPs are likely the main form of release to the aquatic environment.
There are only a few reports of dietary exposures to ENMs in freshwater fish. For single walled carbon nanotubes14 and TiO2 NPs,15 the dietary bioavailability to the internal organs appears to be small or negligible. However, this is not the case with some other ENMs. For example, Connolly et al.16 fed rainbow trout with food containing 300 or 1000 mg kg−1 ZnO, and after 12 days the intestine and gill tissue concentrations of total Zn were greater than the controls, and the elevated Zn concentrations persisted in those tissues for some weeks during a depuration phase. Interestingly, there were only transient changes in the plasma and liver Zn concentrations.16 Zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed for 60 days to 0.8% body weight of 4 mg kg−1 of two sizes of cadmium quantum dots (CdS NPs; 8 or 50 nm diameter) showed elevated total Cd concentrations in the livers from both sizes of the material compared to the unexposed controls.17 However, a key concern for risk assessment is whether the nano form is more hazardous than the equivalent concentration of a metal salt. In sea bream (Pagrus major) at least, animals fed diets containing 4 mg kg−1 of Cu as Cu NPs or CuSO4 for 60 days showed similar increases in total Cu concentrations in the whole carcass and liver; although Cu dissolution and particle characterisation was not reported.18
Recently, our laboratory explored the potential bioavailable fraction of total Ag released from fish food using a sequential extraction procedure that simulated the digestion of food in the gut of fish.1 This in chemico digestibility assay showed that both AgNO3 and Ag NPs have an extractable fraction of Ag between 1–4% of the dose, depending on the region of the gut being simulated; and less for Ag2S NPs. This raises the concern that ingested Ag-containing ENMs could be available via the gut to fish and that the hazard will depend on the chemical form of the ENM. The aim of the present study was therefore to explore the in vivo dietary bioaccumulation potential of total Ag from exposures to diets containing AgNO3, Ag NPs or Ag2S NPs compared to unexposed controls for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). In addition, a post-exposure phase was included to inform on the clearance of any apparent Ag accumulation by the fish. The in chemico digestibility assay was also used to assess any apparent dissolved Ag release from the food pellets at the acidic pH of the stomach. Finally, it is also critical to link any apparent bioaccumulation with biological effects, consequently the health of the animals was monitored in terms of food intake and intestinal morphology. Given the known interferences of dissolved Ag with sodium homeostasis, plasma and tissue electrolytes were also measured along with biomarkers of oxidative stress in the tissues (total glutathione, GSH, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, TBARS).
Water samples were taken daily for oxygen, temperature, pH and ammonia. Water samples for measuring total silver concentration were collected once a week. There was no consistent detectable Ag in the control or Ag2S NP treatments (<0.10 ng mL−1; LOD). Despite monitoring the cleanliness of the fish tanks, the AgNO3 and Ag NP treatments showed a trace amount of total silver in the tanks that was just above the LOD of 0.40 ± 0.04 and 0.47 ± 0.04 ng mL−1 (mean ± S.E.M., n = 24 per treatment), respectively. No Ag was detected during the depuration period.
Six of the stock fish were sampled at the start of the experiment for reference and to determine the background tissue Ag concentrations in the animals. Subsequently, fish from the experimental tanks were sampled at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 during the exposure phase and at the end of the depuration phase on clean food (week 6) for trace metal analysis (i.e., at least 2 fish per tank equating to 6 fish per treatment at each time point). Samples for biochemistry and histology were taken at week 4. Blood samples were also collected at weeks 2, 4 and 6 (see below). The entire experiment was conducted with ethical approval from the UK Home Office via a Project Licence held at Plymouth University under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (1986), and its amendments, in compliance with Directive 2010/63/EU. In order to facilitate dissection and to ensure animal welfare during anaesthesia (see below), fish were not fed on the morning of the sampling days. The last feed of the fish was the evening before sampling, allowing time for evacuation of the gut contents (∼15 h).
The diet used throughout the study was a commercial fish food (Aller Futura, EX, Kaliningrad, Russia), with a pellet size of 1.5 mm. The proximate composition of the diets was (% dry weight from manufacturer's guidelines): lipid, 17; protein, 58; ash, 10.1; fibre, 0.9. The intact food pellets were supplemented with a stock dispersion of the relevant nanomaterial or AgNO3 that was allowed to soak into the pellets and this was then sealed with a topcoat of 10% gelatine; similar to the method used in our previous dietary studies on ENMs.21 The dosing dispersions for mixing with the diets were prepared by sonicating (FB15048 ultrasonic bath, 35 W, Thermo Fisher) 100 mL of a nominal stock concentration of 1 g L−1 of Ag as either AgNO3, Ag NPs and Ag2S NPs prepared in ultrapure water for 1 h (i.e., a 1:
10 dilution of the stock supplied by the manufacturer). Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) was conducted to confirm the materials could be dispersed adequately in these stocks. The mean (± S.D.) hydrodynamic diameter was 73 ± 2 nm (n = 3) for 1 mg L−1 Ag NPs and a mean hydrodynamic diameter of 124 ± 31 nm (n = 3) for 1 mg L−1 Ag2S NPs. This was slowly added to 900 g of the diet and thoroughly, but gently mixed with a commercial food mixer (Kenwood KM810/KM816, 2004). A solution of 10 g of porcine gelatine (>98% purity, Sigma-Aldrich) in 100 mL of ultrapure water was prepared by gentle heating to 40 °C, allowed to cool for 10 minutes, and then gently poured over the diet and mixed in for 15 minutes. The unexposed control diet was prepared in exactly the same way, but dosed with ultrapure water without any silver. The diets were then placed in an incubator at 45 °C and left to dry overnight. The expected nominal concentration in the silver-supplemented diets was 100 mg of total Ag kg-1 dry weight of food. The total Ag concentrations of the diets were measured by ICP-MS (see below) with 0.72 ± 0.22, 92.35 ± 7.33, 96.19 ± 11.49 and 88.16 ± 23.16 mg kg−1 dry weight (mean ± S.E.M., n = 8) in the control, AgNO3, Ag NP and Ag2S NP treatments respectively. There was no significant difference between the Ag concentrations in the exposure diets (one way ANOVA, P > 0.05).
For metal analysis, the fish were dissected for the mid intestine, hind intestine, liver (following gallbladder removal), kidney, spleen, gill and brain (n = 2 fish per tank, n = 6 per treatment). The mid and hind intestine were rinsed in ultrapure water and blotted before wet weight determination. Care was taken to avoid cross-contamination between fish with clean, acid-washed instruments. Tissues (0.001–0.363 g) and carcasses (7–38 g) were freeze dried (Lablyo freeze dryer) for 24 h and weighed. Once dried, the hind intestine, kidney and liver, of week 2, 4 and 6 only, were cut in half; one half was used for total Ag concentrations (and electrolytes) reported here, and the other half for particulate analysis (reported elsewhere). The freeze drying was primarily to dry the samples, but the process also enabled the carcass samples to be crushed to a powder so that a sub-sample of carcass could then be used for acid digestion and total Ag determination (see below).
For the TBARS assay, 130 μL of sample or standard was added to an Eppendorf tube followed by 32.5 μL of 1 mmol L−1 butylated hydroxytoluene (2,6-di-O-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol or BHT) to prevent oxidation, 455 μL of phosphate buffer (100 mmol L−1 potassium phosphate and 5 mM EDTA) and then 162.5 μL of 50% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA) to precipitate excess protein. The samples were then centrifuged for 2 min at 13000 rpm. Following this, 150 μL of the supernatant was added to 3 wells in a 96-well plate, followed by the addition of 75 μL of 1.3% TBA (in 0.3% NaOH). The plate was covered and incubated for 60 min at 60 °C, allowed to cool to room temperature and the absorbances measured at 530 nm against standards (0.5–25 nmol mL−1 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane).
For total glutathione, 20 μL of sample homogenate and 140 μL of mixture containing 0.714 mmol L−1 DTNB (5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid)), 100 mmol L−1 phosphate buffer and 0.357 U mL−1 glutathione reductase into a 96-well plate. To start the reaction, 40 μL of 1 mmol L−1 NADPH was added to each well. The rate of change of the absorbance of each sample were read at 412 nm for 15 min with readings every 15 seconds, and compared to GSH standards. TBARS and GSH were normalised to the protein concentration of each homogenate. Protein was determined in triplicate using 25 μL of sample using a commercially available kit (Pierce BCA protein assay kit 23227, Thermo Fisher). To check for interferences, the assays were run with the appropriate amount of Ag spiked into the samples at their respective tissue concentrations of total Ag. No interferences were found.
Tissue | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data are means ± S.E.M., n = 5/6. Limit of detection (LOD) of organs ranged from 0.8 to 25 ng g−1 dry weight. The LOD in whole blood samples was 5.2 ng mL−1. N/A indicates no sampling at that time point occurred. Different upper case letter denotes statistical difference between treatments within the same week (i.e., treatment effect within tissue by columns). Different lower case letters denotes statistical difference between weeks within the same treatment (i.e., time-effect within rows). Data were analysed using a two-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis. Note, the exposure phase was until the end of week 4, followed by two further weeks on normal food to week 6. | |||||
Mid intestine | |||||
Control | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD |
AgNO3 | 6.33 ± 1.80Aab | 8.31 ± 1.04Aab | 11.86 ± 2.52Aa | 12.77 ± 3.30Aab | 4.79 ± 1.72Ab |
Ag NPs | 3.24 ± 0.51Aa | 5.65 ± 1.15Aab | 12.48 ± 3.13Ab | 10.08 ± 1.60Aab | 12.19 ± 4.15Aab |
Ag2S NPs | 0.24 ± 0.04Ba | 0.17 ± 0.03Ba | 0.22 ± 0.05Ba | 0.21 ± 0.05Ba | <LOD |
Hind intestine | |||||
Control | 0.05 ± 0.01Aa | 0.04 ± 0.01Aa | 0.04 ± 0.00Aa | 0.02 ± 0.01Aa | 0.04 ± 0.01Aa |
AgNO3 | 61.38 ± 6.12Bab | 62.35 ± 6.62Bab | 85.59 ± 10.37Bab | 140.02 ± 22.38Ba | 52.88 ± 10.55Bb |
Ag NPs | 35.55 ± 5.20Ba | 65.15 ± 3.19Ba | 70.43 ± 7.16Ba | 89.87 ± 13.61Ba | 46.36 ± 8.19Ba |
Ag2S NPs | 1.92 ± 0.29Ca | 1.15 ± 0.22Ca | 1.12 ± 0.26Ca | 0.46 ± 0.09Cb | 0.04 ± 0.01Ac |
Liver | |||||
Control | 0.28 ± 0.02Aab | 0.23 ± 0.01Aa | 0.45 ± 0.06Ab | 0.44 ± 0.03Ab | 0.53 ± 0.06Ac |
AgNO3 | 7.27 ± 1.02Ba | 79.76 ± 11.52Bb | 89.43 ± 5.93Bb | 121.77 ± 9.58Bb | 113.33 ± 23.66Bb |
Ag NPs | 5.65 ± 0.57Ba | 64.50 ± 6.40Bb | 85.03 ± 11.86Bbc | 128.63 ± 17.41Bc | 87.67 ± 4.08Bbc |
Ag2S NPs | 1.98 ± 0.31Ca | 4.46 ± 0.68Cb | 7.71 ± 0.94Cc | 10.93 ± 0.95Cc | 10.41 ± 2.15Cc |
Gallbladder | |||||
Control | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD |
AgNO3 | 10.60 ± 3.18Aa | 34.08 ± 9.18Aa | 20.66 ± 3.56Aa | 19.13 ± 3.25Aa | 6.62 ± 2.31Aa |
Ag NPs | 15.60 ± 4.11Aa | 14.64 ± 1.69Aa | 22.84 ± 4.97Aa | 39.79 ± 14.41Aa | 10.37 ± 4.02Aa |
Ag2S NPs | 0.17 ± 0.06Ba | 0.64 ± 0.11Ba | 1.01 ± 0.20Ba | 0.94 ± 0.33Ba | 0.26 ± 0.13Ba |
Kidney | |||||
Control | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD |
AgNO3 | 2.17 ± 0.31Aa | 8.68 ± 1.54Abc | 8.32 ± 1.07Ab | 23.59 ± 3.76Abc | 24.77 ± 4.95Ac |
Ag NPs | 3.24 ± 0.75Aa | 7.16 ± 1.80Aab | 8.87 ± 1.95Abc | 23.01 ± 6.59Acd | 31.16 ± 8.05Ad |
Ag2S NPs | 0.12 ± 0.04Ba | 0.19 ± 0.04Bab | 0.76 ± 0.26Bb | 0.37 ± 0.11Bb | 0.14 ± 0.06Ba |
Spleen | |||||
Control | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD |
AgNO3 | 0.28 ± 0.05Aa | 0.54 ± 0.09Aab | 0.68 ± 0.07Aab | 1.24 ± 0.21Ab | 0.64 ± 0.10Aab |
Ag NPs | 0.24 ± 0.00Aa | 0.49 ± 0.11Aa | 0.71 ± 0.17Aab | 1.94 ± 0.57Ab | 2.31 ± 0.80Bb |
Ag2S NPs | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD |
Gill | |||||
Control | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD |
AgNO3 | 0.73 ± 0.32Aa | 0.75 ± 0.12Aa | 0.83 ± 0.11Aa | 1.30 ± 0.28Aa | 0.35 ± 0.09Aa |
Ag NPs | 0.55 ± 0.06Aa | 0.63 ± 0.10Aa | 0.92 ± 0.12Aa | 1.66 ± 0.30Aa | 0.63 ± 0.08Aa |
Ag2S NPs | 0.14 ± 0.06Bab | 0.05 ± 0.01Ba | 0.77 ± 0.43Bb | 0.03 ± 0.01Ba | <LOD |
Brain | |||||
Control | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD |
AgNO3 | 0.46 ± 0.06Aa | 0.84 ± 0.12Aab | 1.08 ± 0.19Abc | 1.53 ± 0.13Ac | 1.08 ± 0.20Abc |
Ag NPs | 0.43 ± 0.06Aa | 0.57 ± 0.05Aab | 1.02 ± 0.11Abc | 1.57 ± 0.28Ac | 1.05 ± 0.14Abc |
Ag2S NPs | <LOD | 0.04 ± 0.00Ba | 0.07 ± 0.02Ba | 0.02 ± 0.00Ba | 0.04 ± 0.01Ba |
Carcass | |||||
Control | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD | <LOD |
AgNO3 | 1.01 ± 0.21Aa | 1.11 ± 0.17Aa | 1.19 ± 0.14Aa | 2.02 ± 0.35Aa | 0.17 ± 0.02Ab |
Ag NPs | 1.21 ± 0.42Aa | 1.01 ± 0.17Aa | 1.33 ± 0.23Aa | 2.05 ± 0.23Aa | 0.26 ± 0.07Ab |
Ag2S NPs | 0.08 ± 0.03Ba | 0.16 ± 0.05Ba | 0.26 ± 0.08Ba | 0.17 ± 0.04Ba | <LOD |
Blood | |||||
Control | N/A | <LOD | N/A | <LOD | <LOD |
AgNO3 | N/A | 249.76 ± 29.71Aa | N/A | 268.59 ± 17.28Aa | 36.93 ± 4.18Aa |
Ag NPs | N/A | 225.33 ± 13.70Aa | N/A | 260.61 ± 20.97Aa | 54.97 ± 5.74Aa |
Ag2S NPs | N/A | 9.57 ± 2.21Ba | N/A | 21.39 ± 11.78Ba | <LOD |
During the 4 week exposure phase to dietary AgNO3, there were elevated total Ag concentrations in all the organs compared to the unexposed controls, with persistent increases of total Ag concentrations found in the mid and hind intestine in keeping with the route of exposure. The liver as a central compartment in metal accumulation also showed a gradual elevation of Ag with the highest total Ag concentration at week 4 of AgNO3 diet compared to week 1 (two-way ANOVA; P < 0.001). There were also especially elevated Ag concentrations in the gallbladder, whole blood and kidney of the AgNO3 treatment compared to the unexposed controls (Table 1). In contrast, the gills of fish fed the AgNO3 diet showed a steady total Ag concentration of around 1 μg g−1 dw or less, in keeping with the organ being perfused with Ag-containing blood rather than incidental Ag exposure via the water. Two-way ANOVA's revealed the brain (P < 0.05) and spleen (P < 0.05) had time-dependent increases in total Ag, but these did not exceed 2 μg g−1 dw by the end of the exposure phase. The whole blood Ag concentrations remained constant throughout the exposure phase (two-way ANOVA; P > 0.05).
The AgNO3 and Ag NP treatments showed a very similar profile of total Ag concentrations in the organs and whole blood, with no statistically significant differences between these two treatments over the 4 weeks (Table 1). For example, the livers of fish from both treatments at week 4 showed total Ag concentrations around 122–129 μg g−1 dw. However, both the AgNO3 and Ag NP treatments showed statistically significantly higher total Ag concentrations compared to the Ag2S NP treatments in all tissues from week 1 to 4 (Table 1). For example, the livers (two-way ANOVA; P < 0.001) of fish from the Ag2S NP treatment showed only 11 μg g−1 dw of total Ag; an order of magnitude less Ag than either the Ag NP or AgNO3 dietary treatments. Crucially, the mid (P < 0.001) and hind (P < 0.001) intestine of fish from the Ag2S NP treatment accumulated only 2 μg g−1 dw of total Ag or much less (two-way ANOVA; Table 1), which was 10–100 fold less than the intestine of the other Ag treatments and indicating that Ag from Ag2S form was the least available for uptake by the gut. Within the Ag2S NP treatment, there were no time-dependent changes in the gallbladder, brain or carcass concentration (P > 0.05), with values of around 1 μg g−1 dw or less; although there were some transient increases in the total Ag in the kidney (P < 0.03) and hind intestine (P < 0.001) during the exposure to the Ag2S diet (two-way ANOVA; Table 1).
After the 4 weeks of exposure to the Ag-containing diets, there was a two-week depuration phase where the fish from all treatments were fed the unexposed control diet. In the animals previously fed the AgNO3 diet, a two-way ANOVA revealed there were statistically significant decreases in the total Ag concentrations in the hind intestine (P < 0.001) and carcass (P < 0.001) at the end of the depuration phase compared to the values at the end of the exposure phase (week 4, Table 1). However, there was no appreciable clearance of Ag from the other internal organs of fish from the AgNO3 treatment, including the liver (Table 1). An identical pattern of decreasing, or unaltered, total Ag concentrations were found in the organs of fish from the Ag NP treatment in the post exposure phase. Despite some evidence of clearance, none of the organs that had shown elevated total Ag concentrations recovered to control levels, with at least one third or more of the total Ag remaining in the organs of fish from both the AgNO3 and Ag NP treatments (Table 1). The Ag2S treatment showed a similar pattern of decreasing total Ag concentrations in the organs in the post exposure phase, but with a few crucial differences. Unlike the other treatments, the kidney (P = 0.029) showed statistically significant decreases in the total Ag concentrations at week 6 (two-way ANOVA); and in the case of the gill, carcass and the blood, the total Ag returned to control levels (below the detection limit); likely because these compartments had only accumulated a small amount of total Ag in the first place.
Tissue | Treatment | Week 4 | Week 6 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount Ag (ng) | % body burden | Amount Ag (ng) | % body burden | ||
Data are mean ± S.E.M. (n = 5/6). Blood Ag was not included in body distribution % (not taken from the same individual fish so not valid comparison). Control fish are excluded for clarity due to small signals in the hind intestine and liver tissues. Note, the exposure phase was until the end of week 4, followed by two further weeks on normal food to week 6. Statistical analysis was only performed on the % body burden (two-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis) for treatment and time. Different upper case letter denotes statistical difference between treatments within the same week (i.e., treatment effect within tissue by columns). Different lower case letters denotes statistical difference between weeks within the same treatment (i.e., time-effect within rows). Statistical analysis not performed on the mass of Ag in the tissue as this is not standardised data with respect to organ weight. | |||||
Mid intestine | AgNO3 | 126.1 ± 46.6 | 0.47 ± 0.18Aa | 188.5 ± 77.5 | 1.51 ± 0.38Aa |
Ag NPs | 81.6 ± 18.0 | 0.35 ± 0.04Aa | 266.4 ± 85.4 | 2.30 ± 0.81Aa | |
Ag2S NPs | 2.2 ± 0.7 | 0.13 ± 0.05Ba | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.02 ± 0.00Bb | |
Hind intestine | AgNO3 | 2022.7 ± 760.8 | 9.80 ± 3.98Aa | 1591.1 ± 213.2 | 11.52 ± 2.59Aa |
Ag NPs | 1295.7 ± 413.4 | 5.27 ± 1.31Aa | 1601.8 ± 275.8 | 12.20 ± 2.16Aa | |
Ag2S NPs | 17.4 ± 9.6 | 0.90 ± 0.37Ba | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 0.17 ± 0.03Bb | |
Liver | AgNO3 | 7343.5 ± 515.5 | 38.25 ± 3.05Aa | 10![]() |
65.90 ± 5.10Ab |
Ag NPs | 8327.7 ± 947.5 | 38.38 ± 4.07Aa | 9200.4 ± 1033.8 | 62.89 ± 2.16Ab | |
Ag2S NPs | 907.2 ± 68.4 | 44.44 ± 5.34Aa | 937.8 ± 180.2 | 98.88 ± 0.37Bb | |
Gallbladder | AgNO3 | 137.8 ± 68.7 | 0.84 ± 0.50Aa | 78.7 ± 32.7 | 0.51 ± 0.16Aa |
Ag NPs | 194.9 ± 20.0 | 0.95 ± 0.18Aa | 88.6 ± 28.1 | 0.64 ± 0.22Aa | |
Ag2S NPs | 10.5 ± 4.7 | 0.59 ± 0.34Aa | 4.6 ± 3.4 | 0.39 ± 0.26Aa | |
Kidney | AgNO3 | 760.9 ± 132.9 | 3.88 ± 0.62Aa | 1096.8 ± 266.3 | 9.01 ± 1.63Ab |
Ag NPs | 966.1 ± 190.1 | 4.16 ± 0.65Aa | 1517.1 ± 317.5 | 9.25 ± 0.90Ab | |
Ag2S NPs | 59.2 ± 45.3 | 3.11 ± 2.16Aa | 5.4 ± 2.3 | 0.46 ± 0.12Ba | |
Spleen | AgNO3 | 8.2 ± 1.5 | 0.04 ± 0.01Aa | 5.4 ± 1.0 | 0.05 ± 0.01Aa |
Ag NPs | 10.6 ± 4.1 | 0.04 ± 0.01Aa | 16.7 ± 5.5 | 0.09 ± 0.02Aa | |
Ag2S NPs | <LOD | 0.00 ± 0.00 | <LOD | <LOD | |
Gill | AgNO3 | 67.9 ± 29.6 | 0.33 ± 0.12Aa | 12.8 ± 2.4 | 0.11 ± 0.02Aa |
Ag NPs | 89.5 ± 45.3 | 0.34 ± 0.14Aa | 32.5 ± 12.1 | 0.28 ± 0.15Aa | |
Ag2S NPs | 3.7 ± 2.7 | 0.19 ± 0.13A | <LOD | <LOD | |
Brain | AgNO3 | 21.4 ± 2.5 | 0.11 ± 0.01Aa | 22.0 ± 4.4 | 0.19 ± 0.03Aa |
Ag NPs | 25.2 ± 6.6 | 0.11 ± 0.02Aa | 18.3 ± 1.9 | 0.13 ± 0.02Aa | |
Ag2S NPs | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.05 ± 0.01Ba | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.09 ± 0.02Ab | |
Carcass | AgNO3 | 10![]() |
46.28 ± 3.77Aa | 1442.0 ± 256.9 | 11.21 ± 1.48Ab |
Ag NPs | 11![]() |
50.41 ± 2.80Aa | 1968.2 ± 378.6 | 12.23 ± 1.20Ab | |
Ag2S NPs | 942.1 ± 225.7 | 50.58 ± 4.92A | <LOD | <LOD |
After the depuration period (week 6), there was some evidence of redistribution of the body burden in the AgNO3 treatment (Table 2). For example, there was a 4-fold reduction in the proportion of the body burden associated with the carcass (two-way ANOVA; P < 0.001); this was complemented by a significant rise in the kidney (2.4-fold; P = 0.003) and liver (1.7-fold; P < 0.001). The predominant organ of Ag contamination became the liver (66% of the body burden). This pattern of re-distribution of the body burden from the carcass to the kidney and liver was also observed in the Ag NP and Ag2S NP treatments.
The tissue electrolyte concentrations showed only small transient changes between treatments (one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis; Table S2†). For example, the Na+ concentration in the hind intestine of the AgNO3 treatment was significantly lower (1.83 mg g−1) compared to that for the control (3.13 mg g−1; P = 0.032), Ag NP (3.59 mg g−1; P = 0.004) and Ag2S NP treatments (2.99 mg g−1; P = 0.041). There was no nanomaterial-type effects. The moisture content of the tissue (data not shown) ranged between 69 and 84%, depending on the type of tissue. There was no significant difference between the treatments (one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis; P > 0.05).
There were no treatment-related differences in the total GSH concentration of the liver, brain, mid intestine, hind intestine or kidney by the end of the exposure (one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis; Fig. 3). However, there was a small, but statistically significant decrease in total GSH concentration in the gill in the AgNO3 treatment compared to the Ag NP treatment only (P = 0.023), but these effects were not significantly different from the control fish. There were no differences in total GSH between the Ag NP and Ag2S NP treatments at the end of the exposure phase.
There was no change to TBARS concentration of the gill, brain, kidney or liver tissues at the end of the exposure phase (one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis; Fig. 3). However, some small changes were observed in the intestine (Kruskal–Wallis). The mid intestine of the control fish had a TBARS concentration of 3.1 ± 0.3 nmol TBARS mg−1 protein, whereas the Ag NP and Ag2S NP treatments had 1.4 ± 0.1 and 1.3 ± 0.2 nmol TBARS mg−1 protein. A one-way ANOVA revealed the Ag2S NP treatment was significantly lower compared to the control (P = 0.030) but the Ag NP treatment was not (P = 0.057). Within the hind intestine, there was a trend of decreasing TBARS concentration in all the Ag treatments compared to the controls (the latter, 2.1 ± 0.4 nmol TBARS mg−1 protein), but of these only the Ag NP treatment was significantly reduced compared to the controls (P < 0.001). There were no material-type effects.
The unexposed control fish showed either trace amounts of total Ag in the organs (<1 μg g−1 dw) or were below detection, in keeping with previous reports of background Ag in trout.3 The dietary exposure to food containing AgNO3 also resulted in the expected pattern of Ag accumulation, with the total Ag accumulating primarily in the intestine and liver compared to unexposed controls, and consistent with the route of exposure. Some total Ag was also detected in the kidney and blood, but not much in the gills of fish fed food containing AgNO3; similar to Galvez et al.3 There appears to be no in vivo reports of dietary exposure to food pellets containing Ag NPs in rainbow trout. The present study showed a pattern of total Ag accumulation (form unknown) in the organs which was very similar to that of the AgNO3 treatment; both in terms of the target organs and the total Ag concentrations achieved in those organs at the end of the exposure phase (Table 1). The distribution of the Ag body burden was also identical between AgNO3 and Ag NP treatments. This suggests the bioaccumulation hazard from dietary AgNO3 and Ag NPs are the same. Recently, Kleiven et al.25 exposed Atlantic salmon to ∼60 mg Ag kg−1 as either 110AgNO3 or as citrate-coated or uncoated 110Ag NPs in a slurry, administered by oral gavage. After two days of exposure, the radioactivity from the AgNO3 and citrate-coated Ag NPs oral treatment, was associated with the liver, but not the gills;25 similar to the findings in the present study with total Ag.
However, Kleiven et al.25 also noticed that radioactivity from the uncoated Ag NPs was transferred less to the liver than the citrate-coated Ag NPs. This suggests the form of the nanomaterial is important to the accumulation pattern. In the present study, the Ag2S treatment generally showed less total Ag accumulation in the internal organs than that of the Ag NPs after four weeks of exposure (Table 1). An in chemico digestibility assay on the same food used in the present study,1 showed that total Ag from the Ag2S-containing pellets was less extractable and therefore would have lower bioavailability in the gut lumen. This is in keeping with the in vivo findings here. However, bioavailability in the gut lumen may not be the only factor that determines Ag accumulation in the internal organs. From a chemistry perspective, Ag2S NPs are regarded as persistent and if they remain inert in biological media, then perhaps they might be less bioaccessible for uptake by the tissues. It is interesting that Kleiven et al.25 found that the radioactivity in the intestine (∼700, 900 and 700 corrected counts per minute per g wet weight tissue, for AgNO3, coated Ag NPs and uncoated Ag NPs, respectively) were similar; and yet less of the radioactivity associated with uncoated Ag NPs was found in the liver.
Unfortunately, while there have been reports of dietary uptake of metal-containing ENMs in fish (TiO2,15 ZnO,16 CdS particles,17 gold particles,28 quantum dots29); only a few of these studies also measured the carcass with the aim of calculating the body distribution of the total metal. In the present study at the end of the exposure phase, the liver contained 38–44% of the Ag body burden, and regardless of the type of material exposure, this increased to 63–99% after two weeks on normal food (Table 2). This redistribution of the total Ag to the liver, presumably for excretion, has not been previously reported in trout for Ag NPs. The presence of at least some Ag in the gallbladder (Table 1) suggests at least some incidental Ag excretion (form unknown) into the bile from the Ag NP dietary exposure, although the fraction was less than 1% of the body burden (Table 2). At least one study with Ag NPs on marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma) showed retention of Ag from Ag NP dietary exposure,30 but comparisons with freshwater-adapted trout are problematic because of the very different osmoregulatory strategies, renal function, and gut chemistries of marine and freshwater fish.
The kidney may also have a role in depuration and/or storage of Ag (form unknown). The proportion of the body burden in the kidney increased from 4% to 10% in the depuration phase for the Ag NP treatment (Table 2). This might imply some renal excretion of total Ag, or more likely, that the normal macrophage activity in the kidney is resulting in some Ag precipitation in the organ, as is known for Cu NPs.23 The renal perfusion as a proportion of blood flow is also relatively high in freshwater-adapted trout, so the apparent retention by the kidney in the post-exposure phase will inevitably include some total Ag that is in the blood inside the organ. Similar arguments of macrophage activity and blood flow may also apply to the spleen where some total Ag remains (Table 1). Interestingly, van der Zande et al.31 also found that dietary Ag NP exposures in rodents resulted in total Ag accumulation in the internal organs with the most blood flow, such as the liver, spleen, kidney, lung and brain. The rodents also showed some clearance from the blood post-exposure, but with a persistent residual of total Ag in the internal organs, similar to the present study on trout (Tables 1 and 2).
The internal organs of fish fed with Ag2S showed much less total Ag accumulation than either of the other Ag treatments. Consequently, the smaller amounts present were sometimes cleared. For example, at the end of the experiment, the blood and the gills were at the detection limit for total Ag (Table 1); but otherwise the pattern for the depuration phase was similar to the Ag NPs. However, on a proportion of body burden basis, the carcass from the Ag2S treatment cleared all the detectable total Ag compared to the other treatments by week 6 (Table 2).
The absence of intestinal pathology with dietary AgNO3 (Fig. 2) is perhaps not surprising. The gut was well-defended with intact mucous cells (Fig. 2), and the tissue depending on the region of the gut in trout, typically contains between 100–500 μg g−1 wet weight of metallothionein;32 which together might readily chelate the maximum total Ag of around 140 μg g−1 found in the hind intestine (Table 1). There appears to be no reports of in vivo intestinal morphology in trout fed dietary Ag NPs, but in zebrafish fed 500 mg kg−1 of Ag NPs for 14 days there was no loss of integrity of the gut epithelium or any damage to the microvilli on the apical surface of the gut cells.33 Rats receiving a daily administration of 3.6 mg kg−1 by gavage of cubic or spherical Ag NPs (20 mL kg−1 body weight) for 14 days also showed no evidence of histological disturbance to the stomach, small intestine, cecum or colon.34
Exposure to dissolved silver via the water is known to interfere with branchial sodium homeostasis in trout.35 However, dietary silver generally does not. Galvez et al.3 found no effects of dietary Ag on Na+ influx or plasma Na+ in trout. Similarly for the AgNO3 diet in the present study, there were no effects on the total glutathione or TBARS in the gill (Fig. 3), indicating negligible oxidative stress to this osmoregulatory organ. There were no effects on plasma Na+, and only small changes in plasma K+ within the physiological range, compared to controls (Table S1†). The major electrolytes in the internal organs was also unaffected (Table S2†). The same observations were made for dietary exposure to Ag NPs or Ag2S NPs (Tables S1 and S2†). There were some statistically significant disturbances to Cu concentrations in some organs (Table S2†), and this was observed previously in dietary studies with TiO2 NPs in trout,15 although the biological importance of small changes in tissue Cu is unclear. In the present study, there was no evidence of oxidative stress in the internal organs (Fig. 3).
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9en00261h |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 |