Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
Correction: A theoretical study of the geometries, and electronic and surface properties of sphere-like (SiB)2n (n = 6–27, 30) functional nanomaterials
Run-Ning
Zhao
ab,
Zi-Chen
Lu
c,
Rui
Chen
a and
Ju-Guang
Han
*b
aCollege of Arts and Sciences, Shanghai DianJi University, Shanghai 201306, People's Republic of China
bNational Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230029, People's Republic of China. E-mail: jghan@ustc.edu.cn
cCloud Computing Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dongguan 523808, China
First published on 20th November 2019
Abstract
Correction for ‘A theoretical study of the geometries, and electronic and surface properties of sphere-like (SiB)2n (n = 6–27, 30) functional nanomaterials’ by Run-Ning Zhao et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, DOI: 10.1039/c9cp04900b.
The authors wish to revise several places of their article, beginning on the first page, in order to correct the errors in the text. The amended errors are provided below:
(1) On line 3 of the abstract: ‘the (SiB)36 cage is identified as the most stable nanocluster’ is corrected as ‘the (SiB)38 cage is identified as the most stable nanocluster’.
(2) On page 4 of this article: left column, last paragraph of section 3.2, lines 9–10, ‘assigned as 2n = 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48.’ corrects as ‘assigned as 2n = 20, 26, 32, 38, 44, and 50.’
(3) On page 4 of this article: left column, last paragraph of section 3.2, line 11, ‘is 2n = 36, and the particular (SiB)36 nanocage’ corrects as ‘is 2n = 38, and the particular (SiB)38 nanocage’.
(4) On page 4 of this article: left column, last paragraph of section 3.2, lines 15, 16, and 22, ‘(SiB)36’ corrects as ‘(SiB)38’.
(5) On page 4 of this article: left column, last paragraph of section 3.2, lines 18 and 19, ‘However, (SiB)20 and (SiB)38 are the least stable structures.’ corrects as ‘However, (SiB)22 and (SiB)40 are the least stable structures.’
(6) On page 8 of this article in the Summaries and conclusions section: left column, line 8, ‘(SiB)36 nanocluster’ corrects as ‘(SiB)38 nanocluster’.
(7) On page 3 of this article: right column, the first paragraph of section 3.2, lines 14 and 16, ‘n = 5–27, 30’ corrects as ‘n = 6–27, 30’.
(8) On the page 5 of this article: right column, ‘3.4 Charge-transfer in (Ge6B6)n (n = 2–10) nanocages’ corrects as ‘3.4 Charge-transfer in (SiB)2n (n = 6–27, 30) nanocages’.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019 |