Open Access Article
Liana
Vaccari
a,
Daniel B.
Allan
b,
Nima
Sharifi-Mood
a,
Aayush R.
Singh
a,
Robert L.
Leheny
b and
Kathleen J.
Stebe
*a
aChemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. E-mail: kstebe@seas.upenn.edu
bDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
First published on 19th January 2018
Correction for ‘Films of bacteria at interfaces: three stages of behaviour’ by Liana Vaccari et al., Soft Matter, 2015, 11, 6062–6074.
As a result, Fig. 10 should be replaced with the following, corrected figure and caption:
In addition the discussion regarding Fig. 10 in the main text (on page 6070 of the published article) should be replaced with the following (changes are indicated by bold type):
The fit results at various compressions show K2D varies weakly with compression (Fig. 10), with average value K2D = 41.8 ± 12.3 mN m−1; this modulus is far larger than that reported for hexadecane drops emulsified and aged over minutes in the presence of bacteria characterized by conventional pendant drop tensiometry and micropipette aspiration33,34 for which a modulus of 5.0 mN m−1 is reported, indicating that bacteria strain and surface age may play important roles in the mechanics of films at these interfaces. Pendant drop elastometry assuming isotropic films was performed for bacteria grown on mineral and medium chain triglyceride oils, with elasticities ranging from 10–30 mN m−1 and 2–10 mN m−1, respectively.31 Interestingly, the modulus we find is significantly higher than spring constants for individual planktonic Gram-negative bacteria as characterized by AFM, which range from 10–20 mN m−1; bacteria may form biofilms with elastic moduli of magnitudes similar to their own elasticities.
Note that values for the 2D Poisson ratio extracted by the scheme vary weakly (inset in Fig. 10). This variation is not physically significant; we find that pendant drop shapes are very weakly dependent on this quantity.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018 |