Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Chiral probes for α1-AGP reporting by species-specific induced circularly polarised luminescence

Sergey Shuvaev *a, Elizaveta A. Suturina b, Kevin Mason a and David Parker *a
aDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK. E-mail: david.parker@dur.ac.uk
bSchool of Chemistry, The University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK

Received 30th January 2018 , Accepted 18th February 2018

First published on 19th February 2018


Luminescence spectroscopy has been used to monitor the selective and reversible binding of pH sensitive, macrocyclic lanthanide complexes, [LnL1], to the serum protein α1-AGP, whose concentration can vary significantly in response to inflammatory processes. On binding α1-AGP, a very strong induced circularly-polarised europium luminescence signal was observed that was of opposite sign for human and bovine variants of α1-AGP – reflecting the differences in the chiral environment of their drug-binding pockets. A mixture of [EuL1] and [TbL1] complexes allowed the ratiometric monitoring of α1-AGP levels in serum. Moreover, competitive displacement of [EuL1] from the protein by certain prescription drugs could be monitored, allowing the determination of drug binding constants. Reversible binding of the sulphonamide arm as a function of pH, led to a change of the coordination environment around the lanthanide ion, from twisted square antiprism (TSAP) to a square antiprismatic geometry (SAP), signalled by emission spectral changes and verified by detailed computations and the fitting of NMR pseudocontact shift data in the sulphonamide bound TSAP structure for the Dy and Eu examples. Such analyses allowed a full definition of the magnetic susceptibility tensor for [DyL1].


Introduction

The acute phase proteins found in human serum play a multitude of roles in vivo. Deviations from their normal concentration values can indicate the onset or presence of certain diseases. The second most abundant protein is α1-acid glycoprotein, α1-AGP, and fluctuations in its serum concentration merit close attention.1,2 Indeed, it has been hailed as the most important of four key circulating biomarkers that can be used to assess the five-year risk of mortality by any cause.3 It has been shown that α1-AGP transports a wide range of basic drugs in human plasma, e.g. methadone, disopyramide and many common anaesthetics such as lidocaine and bupivacaine, often competing with the more abundant serum albumin in this regard.4–6 Up to a 4-fold increase in its concentration is observed as a consequence of different inflammatory processes, including severe chronic diseases, such as cancer and HIV.7 This significant change of the concentration in response to external stimulus, characteristic for the acute phase proteins, inevitably affects drug metabolism and bioavailability, necessitating revised drug prescription for patients with inflammation.8,9

However, there are a very limited number of publications on α1-AGP selective probes, with even fewer reporting their performance in serum. In the present paper, we report a series of new pH-responsive lanthanide complexes [LnL1] (Ln = Y, Eu, Tb, Dy; Fig. 1), which show a pronounced and species-dependent affinity towards α1-AGP, and a remarkable variation in metal complex helicity in the protein bound form, that is a function of AGP type and of local pH. The conjugated chromophore has a strong ICT transition that imparts sensitivity to changes in its local environment. Earlier, we reported a europium DO2A-based probe, [EuL2], bearing two azaxanthone chromophores that showed selective binding for both α1-AGP and α1-antitrypsin (α1-AAT) with respect to human serum albumin (Fig. 2).10–12 It showed an increase of the total emission intensity and a large induced circularly polarised luminescence (CPL) upon binding these proteins only. It was hypothesised that the europium complex was embedded within the drug-binding pocket, and was bound to the carboxylate oxygen atom of a Glu-64 residue of α1-AGP, following dissociation of one of the azaxanthone nitrogen atoms. Juxtaposition of the amino-acid sequences in α1-AGP for different mammalian species reveals considerable discrepancies in the residues lining the drug-binding pocket, suggesting variable drug-binding affinities for different species. However, systematic analysis of the impact of these deviations on drug binding affinity is limited.


image file: c8sc00482j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Molecular structure of [LnL1], Ln = Y, Eu, Tb and Dy.

image file: c8sc00482j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Molecular structures of the bis-azaxanthone complex, [EuL2]12 (left) and of [EuL3]13 (right).

Results and discussion

Synthetic procedures

The complexes [LnL1] (Ln = Y, Eu, Tb, Dy) were synthesised by successive alkylation reactions of a DO2A-ethyl ester precursor (Scheme S1). The chromophore was synthesised via a Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction in a microwave reactor, using a Pd(TTP)2Cl2 catalyst. The freshly prepared benzylic methanesulphonate derivative of this chromophore was reacted with DO2A-ethyl ester, followed by reverse-phase HPLC purification. The isolated tri-substituted cyclen derivative was subsequently reacted with N-methanesulfonyl-aziridine, and RP-HPLC purification yielded the diethyl ester of ligand L1. The ester was hydrolysed in aq. NaOH solution, neutralised with acid and reacted with the corresponding LnCl3 salt. The desired [LnL1] complexes were purified by reverse-phase HPLC.

Human α1-AGP binding studies of [EuL1] and [TbL1]

The complexes [TbL1] and [DyL1] each showed a characteristic ion-centred emission signature, whilst [EuL1] showed very low emission intensity. As significant residual ligand fluorescence was not observed, the quenching of emission in [EuL1] is likely to be due to competitive depopulation of the ligand singlet excited state by formation of a ligand-to-metal charge transfer state. Bubbling argon gas through the aqueous solution of [EuL1] altered neither the magnitude nor the lifetime of the observed emission, consistent with the singlet nature of the hypothesised ICT state. By decreasing the polarity of the solvent, the total emission intensity was significantly enhanced, with some changes in the Eu emission spectral signature observed in less polar solvents, such as THF and 1,4-dioxane (Fig. S1). Emission intensity variations did not correlate with changes in solvent viscosity. The measured lifetime of the excited state also did not vary, negating the involvement of a twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT) state in the emission quenching process.

A similar solvent-dependent behaviour was observed in recent work, where the ICT state in the related europium complex, [EuL3]13 (Fig. 2), demonstrated a strong solvent dependence of emission. Indeed, a near exponential increase of the total emission intensity was found as a function of Reichardt's solvent polarity parameter.13 Furthermore, it was revealed that addition of HSA resulted in a 100-fold amplification of the signal intensity, attributed to the significant polarity change in the drug-binding pocket.

With this behaviour in mind, similar protein binding studies were carried out for [EuL1], examining human and bovine serum albumins, γ-ImG, fibrinogen, α1-AGP (bovine and human forms) and α1-AAT. Only addition of α1-AGP (human and bovine) revealed a substantial increase in the total europium emission intensity, with apparent binding constants log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 4.1 and 4.7 estimated for the human and bovine species respectively (Fig. 3). Only for the bovine species was a significant change in the spectral signature observed (0.1 M HEPES, pH = 7.40).


image file: c8sc00482j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Change of the total emission intensity upon addition of human α1-AGP to [EuL1]; ([EuL1] 9 μM; log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 4.1(01), assuming a 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 binding isotherm, λex = 310 nm, 298 K, pH = 7.40).

With added human α1-AGP, [EuL1] showed an induced CPL signal that was almost identical to that observed for [EuL3] with added HSA. A closer inspection of the structure of [EuL1] reveals a coordination environment almost identical to [EuL3], with two carboxylate oxygen atoms, a sulphonamide nitrogen atom and a pyridine nitrogen atom bound to the Eu3+ ion. As less significant change of the spectral signature was observed upon addition of human α1-AGP, perturbation of the primary coordination environment is unlikely to have occurred and the observed induced CPL can be attributed to the preferential stabilisation of one of the two complex enantiomers, Λ(λλλλ) and Δ(δδδδ), which exist in equilibrium in aqueous solution. To assign the observed CPL signature to one of these enantiomers, a comparison of the CPL spectrum with previously reported spectra of chiral europium complexes was carried out.14 Such an analysis resulted in a tentative Δ (δδδδ) assignment, (Fig. S9).

The sulphonamide arm binding behaviour determines the pH changes in the emission spectrum.15–18 Reversible binding of the nitrogen to Eu3+ ion occurs in solution with protonation leading to addition of coordinated water molecules (Scheme 1, and vide infra). Addition of certain anions and proteins can significantly alter the position of the equilibrium, affecting the pKa associated with protonation of the sulphonamide nitrogen, as a result of competitive binding.15 As only a very low emission intensity was observed for [EuL1] without any added α1-AGP, the terbium analogue [TbL1] was also used to investigate the protonation behaviour of the complex.


image file: c8sc00482j-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Equilibria present in the [LnL1]1-AGP system, showing the protonated and non-protonated forms.

Only minor changes to the terbium emission pattern were observed upon lowering the pH from 8.0 to 3.0, whilst the total emission intensity decreased, consistent with a replacement of the sulphonamide nitrogen atom by two water molecules. At the same time, the lifetime of the terbium 5D4 excited state decreased from 1.85 ms to 1.14 ms, in line with the more efficient non-radiative quenching via energy transfer to the proximate OH oscillators associated with the coordinated waters. The apparent pKa of the free Tb complex (4.2(±0.1)) was similar to that measured for [EuL1] when bound to human α1-AGP (4.6(±0.1)).

Protein addition for [TbL1] and [EuL1] increased the lifetime of the excited state, consistent with the absence of water molecules bound to the lanthanide ion at both lower and ambient pH (q = 0). At lower pH, q is also zero; such behaviour suggests that the bound water was replaced with a carboxylate oxygen (e.g. the side chain carboxylate oxygen of Glu-64/65 for human and potentially bovine AGP, respectively) in the protein bound form of the complex (Table 1).

Table 1 Lifetimes of the 5D0 excited state (in H2O and D2O) and hydration numbers (q) for [EuL1] in the presence of human and bovine α1-AGP, as well as for [TbL1] with no added protein
H2O/ms D2O/ms q
a Obtained for [TbL1]; Tb emission lifetimes with added human AGP were 2.06 (pH 4.1) and 1.63 ms (pH 8.1), and 1.78 ms with added bovine AGP (pH 6.5), consistent with q = 0 in each case. b At high pH/pD quenching by charge transfer inhibits the use of the normal method of lifetime analysis to assess q values, for which the dominant quenching mechanism must only involve vibrational energy transfer to OH oscillators.
Human α1-AGP 0.78 (pH 7.0) 1.04 (pD 7.4) 0.1
0.91 (pH 3.0) 1.17 (pD 3.4) 0
Bovine α1-AGP 0.22 (pH 9.8) 0.22 (pD 10.4) 0b
0.82 (pH 6.0) 1.33 (pD 6.4) 0.3
No proteina 1.80 (pH 7.0) 1.98 (pD 7.4) 0
1.14 (pH 3.0) 1.92 (pD 3.4) 1.5


With the human α1-AGP bound [EuL1] complex, a concomitant change of the spectral signature with pH was observed. The most remarkable change occurred in the 5D07F1 transition (Fig. 4), where a change in the sign of the crystal field parameter B20 was observed, by analysing the nature of the ΔJ = 1 manifold.19,20 The values of B20 and B22 (i.e. defined in terms of spherical tensor analysis),21b were −556 and −117 cm−1 for the high pH form, and +448 and +92 cm−1 in the protein bound state.


image file: c8sc00482j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Changes of the emission spectrum of [EuL1] in the presence of human α1-AGP at pH = 3.0 (SAP, black) and pH = 6.0 (TSAP, red) ([EuL1] 8 μM, α1-AGP 25 μM, λex = 310 nm, 298 K).

These findings can be explained in terms of the transition between the TSAP (with the sulphonamide nitrogen bound at higher pH) and SAP (with a dissociated sulphonamide nitrogen) coordination geometries. Attempts to trace these changes by following chemical shifts in the 1H NMR spectrum as a function of pH were not successful, as very broad signals were observed at lower pH values, probably as a result of the fast exchange between conformational isomers in the SAP configuration.

NMR analysis of complex structure

The simulation of NMR pseudocontact shift data (PCS) is a valuable tool to evaluate the quality of the proposed molecular structure of a lanthanide complex in solution, by comparing calculated values with experimentally observed shifts. It has been previously shown that predicted PCS values based on an optimised X-ray structure of the complex were in a good agreement with experimentally observed ones.21 As no crystal structure was available for [LnL1], DFT calculations were employed instead, and the final structures are shown above (Fig. 5). Lifetime measurements had shown that reversible protonation of the sulphonamide nitrogen at lower pH replaced it with two water molecules directly bound to the lanthanide ion, increasing its coordination number from 8 to 9. The concomitant changes of the sign of B20 term, as evident from the emission spectrum of Eu (Fig. 4), suggested the change of coordination environment between TSAP and SAP configurations. To verify this assumption, DFT simulations of structures of the 8-coordinate TSAP and 9-coordinate SAP isomers (Fig. 5), augmented by pseudo-contact shift fitting of [EuL1] and [DyL1] were carried out. In addition, 1H NMR and 1H–1H COSY spectra for the TSAP isomer were measured, (Fig. S2 and S5).
image file: c8sc00482j-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Optimised structures of [YL1] in octadentate twisted square antiprismatic (TSAP) coordination geometry and [HYL1(H2O)2]+ in 9-coordinate mono-capped square-antiprismatic coordination (SAP).

The 1H NMR spectrum (Fig. S2), 1H–1H NOESY (Fig. S3) and 1H–1H ROESY (Fig. S4) spectra of [YL1] were used to estimate the diamagnetic contribution to the chemical shifts. A simulated structure of the TSAP isomer for [DyL1] in particular produced a very good fit (Fig. 6 and 7, Tables 2 and S1–S4). Since exchange broadened signals were obtained at lower pH values for the SAP structure, no fitting of its simulated structure was possible as no PCS values were recorded for the SAP isomer.


image file: c8sc00482j-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Pseudocontact shift fields for the [DyL1] complex, reconstructed by Spinach using the best-fit magnetic susceptibility tensor. Positive PCS is shown in red, negative – in blue, transparency indicates the absolute value.

image file: c8sc00482j-f7.tif
Fig. 7 Experimental 1H NMR spectrum of [DyL1] (magenta) and a simulated spectrum (blue); (1T, 300 K, D2O) showing the comparison of theoretical and experimental pseudocontact shift values (PCS) (Tables S1 and S3).
Table 2 Magnetic susceptibility tensors (SI units) for the complex [DyL1] in comparison to the related TSAP triphosphinate-mono-pyridyl complex [DyL4],21 obtained by paramagnetic shift fitting and computed by CASSCF (in parentheses), expressed in terms of axiality (χax), rhombicity (χrh) and Euler angles
Complex χ ax3 χ rh/χax α β γ
[DyL1] −0.55 0.23 185 20 207
[DyL4] −0.57, (−0.59) 0.30, (0.25) 189, (198) 20, (24) 201, (14)


The best-fit magnetic susceptibility tensor (Table 2) and the resulting PCS field (Fig. 6) are very similar in size and orientation to those found with [DyL4],21a,b consistent with their very similar TSAP coordination geometries (Fig. 5).

In Bleaney's theory of magnetic anisotropy,21c,d ligand field parameters can be computed from the axiality and rhombicity of the magnetic susceptibility, at the high temperature limit.

 
image file: c8sc00482j-t1.tif(1)

According to eqn (1), the ligand field parameters B20 and B22 are estimated to be −486 and −137 cm−1, which is in quite good agreement with the parameters extracted from the europium emission spectra. The small variation might be due to the differences in the radial wavefunction between Eu(III) and Dy(III) or because of the high temperature limit approximation.

The lifetime data had shown that there were no bound water molecules in the presence of added protein (Table 1). However, the positive sign of the B20 term was evident analysing the europium emission spectrum of the protein bound form, consistent with a very different coordination type that is adopted when chelating, for example, the carboxylate oxygens of a proximate Glu or Asp side chain.

Tables of experimental and calculated shifts are given in the ESI, together with optimized structural coordinates for the Y, Eu, Tb and Dy complexes of L1 in the TSAP form and the 9-coordinate SAP structure with the unbound sulphonamide N atom and two added waters for Y and Eu. The Y, Eu, Tb and Dy complexes of L1 are isostructural.

Bovine α1-AGP binding studies of [EuL1] and [TbL1]

Very different emission behaviour was observed in the presence of bovine α1-AGP, where a change of the spectral signature was observed upon binding the protein to [EuL1] (0.1 M HEPES, pH = 7.40). At this pH, the resulting emission spectral form resembled that observed for [EuL1] with added human α1-AGP, when the sulphonamide nitrogen was dissociated and replaced with carboxylate oxygen atoms of the side chain amino-acid. This behaviour initially suggested a higher pKa value for [EuL1] with added bovine α1-AGP (Fig. S6–S8). Indeed, an apparent pKa of 8.4(±0.1) was calculated (Fig. 8). This value is much higher than that observed for [TbL1] with no added protein (4.2(±0.1)), (Fig. S13).
image file: c8sc00482j-f8.tif
Fig. 8 The pH dependence of europium emission in bovine α1-AGP bound complex [EuL1] (295 K, 0.1 M NaCl, 5 μM [EuL1], 25 μM α1-AGP).

Both the total emission intensity and the lifetime of the excited state experienced a significant reduction, with the latter decreasing from τ = 0.84 ms (pH 6.2), to τ = 0.22 ms (pH 9.9). The observed strong quenching of emission at higher pH, along with the elevated pKa value with added bovine (but not human) α1-AGP suggests a different interaction between [EuL1] and the amino-acids in the bovine drug-binding pocket.

The absence of a crystal structure of bovine α1-AGP makes it difficult to be sure about which amino-acids are close in space to the drug-binding pocket. However, a simulated computer model of the bovine α1-AGP tertiary structure22a suggests a significant correspondence in the structures of human and bovine variants of the protein, (Fig. S14), and therefore amino-acid residues that may be close to the bound drug are expected to have rather similar positions in the 3D structure. On examining those residues that are close to the expected drug-binding site, the aromatic amino-acid Tyr-84 was pinpointed in bovine α1-AGP; in the human form the nearest Tyr residue is Tyr-78. The side chain phenol can potentially bind to a sulphonamide oxygen, through formation of a stabilising hydrogen bond. When this phenol is deprotonated, i.e. at higher pH, the sulphonamide arm can no longer interact with Tyr-84, as the sulphonamide nitrogen atom is coordinated to Eu3+ (Fig. 9). At the same time, the electron rich phenolate of Tyr-84 can quench [EuL1] emission by a charge transfer mechanism that also occurred, but to a lesser degree with [TbL1]. It is therefore plausible that it is the protonation of Tyr-84 that is being observed in the pH dependence of Eu emission (Fig. 8). The lowered phenol pKa from its normal value around 9.7, can be attributed to either an electrostatic field effect, causing stabilisation of the conjugate base by proximate cationic side chains (e.g. Lys-82, Arg-85), or by a stabilising H-bonding interaction with a proximate H-bond donor.22b In the human form of AGP, the nearest Tyr (Tyr-78) in contrast is flanked by threonine, glutamine and leucine residues so no such field effect seems possible. Previous examples of the quenching of sensitised Eu emission by electron rich species, have included urate, ascorbate and various catecholates.23


image file: c8sc00482j-f9.tif
Fig. 9 Rationalisation of the enhanced pKa observed for [LnL1] when bound to bovine α1-AGP. In the sulphonamide bound complex, the proximate phenolate quenches the luminescence by electron transfer.

The analysis of the induced CPL spectrum of [EuL1] with added bovine α1-AGP at higher pH revealed a spectrum of opposite sign to that observed for [EuL1] with added human α1-AGP, under the same conditions (Fig. 10 and S9). This surprising observation suggests the stabilisation of the complex with opposite helicity (i.e. the Λ(λλλλ) enantiomer) for [EuL1] when it is located within the drug-binding pocket of bovine α1-AGP. Upon lowering the pH of the solution, the CPL spectrum also changed, and resembled the inverted signature of [EuL1] with added human α1-AGP, although not completely matching it. These small differences in the CPL and total emission signatures may be caused by differences between the amino-acid moieties, (e.g. a Glu or Asp side chain O) which bind to [EuL1] at lower pH values, when the sulphonamide arm is dissociated.


image file: c8sc00482j-f10.tif
Fig. 10 Induced CPL spectra of [EuL1] bound with human and bovine α1-AGP, when the sulfonamide arm is coordinated (pH = 9.3, top) and when it is not bound (pH = 3.6, lower) to the Eu3+ ion (λex = 310 nm, D2O, 295 K).

Similar behaviour was observed for [TbL1] with added human and bovine α1-AGP (Fig. S10), when opposite, but not identical CPL spectral signatures were found for the unbound sulphonamide. At elevated pH, when the sulphonamide N atom is coordinated, very weak induced CPL signals were observed for each protein. Because [TbL1] was emissive in the absence of protein, and since addition of bovine α1-AGP induced a strong CPL signal, the change in the dissymmetry ratio, gem, could be monitored as a function of added protein concentration (Fig. S11). Analysis of the resultant binding isotherm revealed an affinity constant log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 5.1, which is a somewhat higher value than that calculated by following the total emission intensity variation of [EuL1] (log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 4.7).

Ratiometric monitoring of α1-AGP levels in serum

The α1-AGP concentration in plasma can experience up to a four-fold increase from normal values, in response to inflammatory stimulus. Accordingly, to foetal calf or human serum samples was added a mixture of [EuL1] and [TbL1] (22 μM/2 μM) and the variation of the emission intensity ratio was monitored upon incremental addition of bovine and human α1-AGP, respectively (Fig. 11 and S21). In each case, a quasi-linear dependence between the relative intensities of the Tb 5D47F5 band in [TbL1] and the 5D07F2 transition in [EuL1] with the concentration of α1-AGP was observed. A lower apparent binding affinity was noted, compared to those measured in salt and buffer solution only. This discrepancy might be explained by competitive binding of [EuL1] and [TbL1] to serum albumin, decreasing the effective concentration of α1-AGP.
image file: c8sc00482j-f11.tif
Fig. 11 Change of the total emission spectrum of [EuL1]/[TbL1] (22 μM/2 μM) ‘cocktail’ upon addition of human α1-AGP to human serum (pH = 7.40, λex = 310 nm, 298 K).

Even though preliminary studies revealed no ‘switch-on’ response for [EuL1] upon addition of human and bovine serum albumin, a more detailed analysis of its effect on the total emission intensity of [TbL1] was carried out. In each case, (HSA and BSA), quenching of the total emission intensity was observed when excess of the protein was added, with no visible change of the spectral signature detected. Similar binding constants were observed with added HSA and BSA (log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 3.4 and log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 3.2, respectively, Fig. S22 and S23), which are two orders of magnitude lower than the corresponding binding constants for this complex with α1-AGP. Notwithstanding this difference in binding constants, the occurrence of a significantly higher concentration of serum albumin (ca. 0.6 mM) than α1-AGP (0.02 mM) most likely results in a noticeable quenching of both the Tb and Eu excited states by charge transfer from serum albumin.

To account for serum albumin quenching, a three-dimensional titration chart was plotted by considering simultaneous variation of the concentration of both human serum albumin and human α1-AGP. The resulting plot, (Fig. 12), revealed the rising trend for the 5D47F5/5D07F2 intensity ratio at any given concentration of HSA, although the slope of the plotted curve is in turn a function of the HSA concentration. The dependence is shallower at higher concentrations of HSA, consistent with more efficient competitive binding of [EuL1] and [TbL1] to HSA as its concentration rises. The described system could be improved further by introducing a third component, which has a different spectral response to both HSA and human α1-AGP compared to [EuL1] and [TbL1], or one that is non-responsive to the presence of each of the two proteins. Such a system could then provide simultaneous monitoring of the concentration of both proteins in serum, allowing a calibration surface for variable concentrations of HSA and human α1-AGP to be defined.


image file: c8sc00482j-f12.tif
Fig. 12 Variation of the relative intensity of emission bands at 515–567 nm and 602–636 nm of the mixture of [EuL1] and [TbL1] (21 μM/0.8 μM) as a function of added HSA and human α1-AGP (λex = 310 nm, 298 K).

Competitive drug-binding studies

In contrast to serum albumin, only one well-defined binding pocket is present in α1-AGP. This pocket can permit the transport of essential drugs in plasma, and in several cases the drug is preferentially bound to serum albumin. It has been shown recently that a luminescent europium complex can be efficiently used for determining binding constants of selected drugs to human α1-AGP, by competitive replacement of the luminescent complex bound to the protein with added drug, accompanied by the changes in the total emission intensity and induced CPL signal.12 The determined binding constants were in good agreement with previously reported values, corroborating the applicability of this approach.

In the present study, three common drugs – imatinib, lidocaine and bupivacaine (Fig. 13) – were used to examine competitive binding between [EuL1] and bovine or human α1-AGP (Table 3). Addition of lidocaine (Fig. S15) and bupivacaine (Fig. S17) to human α1-AGP with bound [EuL1] revealed binding constants (log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 4.4 and 5.6 respectively) similar to those previously reported (log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 4.4 and 5.7 respectively). A very similar value was observed in analogous experiments with bovine α1-AGP (log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 4.5) for lidocaine (Fig. S16), although the value for bupivacaine (Fig. S18) was found to be significantly higher (log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 6.4). In each case, the total emission intensity of [EuL1] returned to the initial value observed in the absence of added protein, when an excess of the drug has been added.


image file: c8sc00482j-f13.tif
Fig. 13 Molecular structures of drugs used in the present study.
Table 3 Binding affinities of [EuL1], lidocaine, bupivacaine and imatinib to bovine and human α1-AGP (pH = 7.40, 298 K). Literature values are given in parentheses;24,25 no literature data is available for the bovine AGP drug affinities
[EuL1] Lidocaine Bupivacaine Imatinib
Human α1-AGP 4.1 4.5 (4.4) 5.6 (5.7) 5.6 (6.4)
Bovine α1-AGP 4.7 4.5 6.4 4.8


A different situation was observed when imatinib (Fig. S19 and S20) was added to the proteins with bound [EuL1]. Addition of imatinib did not seem to completely displace bound [EuL1], as the spectral signature of the europium complex and the dissymmetry factor of the terbium analogue [TbL1] bound to bovine α1-AGP did not change upon addition of the drug. Emission quenching was observed for both europium and terbium complexes, and the total emission intensity of [EuL1] with excess of added drug was lower than for the complex without added protein, suggesting an efficient non-radiative quenching of the biaryl chromophore by imatinib inside the drug-binding pocket (e.g. by a π–π stacking interaction).

Significantly lower binding constants were calculated for the binding of imatinib to human α1-AGP (log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 5.6 vs. log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 6.4), and this was even an order of magnitude lower (log[thin space (1/6-em)]K = 4.8) in the case of bovine α1-AGP.

The relatively low binding constant of [EuL1] to human and bovine α1-AGP permitted competitive binding experiments to be carried out, e.g. with lidocaine and bupivacaine – drugs that both posses higher binding affinities towards α1-AGP than [EuL1]. In spite of the differences between human and bovine α1-AGP in their amino-acid content near the drug-binding site, similar binding constants were found in each case. The terbium analogue, [TbL1], with a strong induced CPL signal when bound to bovine α1-AGP can itself be used for monitoring drug-binding, by following the variation of the dissymmetry factor.

Conclusions

Water-soluble and pH-responsive macrocyclic lanthanide complexes with a biaryl chromophore exhibit a high affinity towards the human and bovine forms of the serum protein, α1-AGP. The emission of [EuL1] is quenched in aqueous solution in the absence of the protein, and showed a 30-fold increase in emission intensity upon adding α1-AGP. Furthermore, this pH-responsive probe showed a strong CPL signal, which intriguingly showed opposite signs for the human and bovine variants of α1-AGP. As the [EuL1] and [TbL1] complexes showed different sensitivity towards added α1-AGP, their mixture could be used in creating a ratiometric system to determine the concentration of α1-AGP, in either human or bovine serum. Competitive binding studies with popular prescription drugs showed little difference in affinity between human and bovine variants of α1-AGP.

Changes in the emission spectral signature of the europium complex as a function of pH revealed the reversible switch between a twisted square antiprismatic structure (TSAP) at higher pH and a mono-capped square antiprismatic (SAP) coordination at lower pH. The corresponding structures of the Eu and Dy systems were simulated using a combined DFT and NMR pseudocontact shift (PCS) fitting analysis, estimating the pseudocontact shifts from the behaviour of the diamagnetic analogue [YL1]. The simulation allowed the full magnetic susceptibility tensor for [DyL1] to be calculated, and it was found to be remarkably similar to that recently found for the complex [DyL4] which also possesses an eight-coordinate TSAP structure. Taken together, such NMR and computational analyses are in agreement with the large change in solution structure revealed by emission analysis that allows the assessment of the europium ligand field parameters, B20 and B22, whose sign changes upon the TSAP and SAP interconversion. Indeed, in the past, such behaviour has either been overlooked or misapprehended,26 and yet it can explain the very dramatic changes in paramagnetic NMR and lanthanide emission spectral behaviour that can characterise both large21b and surprisingly, even more subtle ligand field perturbations.27

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Durham University for a Doctoral Scholarship (S. S.), and we thank the referees for some very helpful comments.

Notes and references

  1. K. Nishi, T. Ono, T. Nakamura, N. Fukunaga, M. Izumi, H. Watanabe, A. Suenaga, T. Maruyama, Y. Yamagata, S. Curry and M. Otagiri, J. Biol. Chem., 2011, 286, 14427–14434 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. F. Zsila and Y. Iwao, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj., 2007, 1770, 797–809 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. K. Fischer, J. Kettunen, P. Würtz, T. Haller, A. S. Havulinna, A. J. Kangas, P. Soininen, T. Esko, M. L. Tammesoo, R. Mägi, S. Smit, A. Palotie, S. Ripatti, V. Salomaa, M. Ala-Korpela, M. Perola and A. Metspalu, PLoS Med., 2014, 11(2), e1001606 Search PubMed.
  4. Z. H. Israili and P. G. Dayton, Drug Metab. Rev., 2001, 33, 161–235 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. Z. Huang and T. Ung, Curr. Drug Metab., 2013, 14, 226–238 CAS.
  6. M. Otagiri, Yakugaku Zasshi, 2009, 129, 413–425 CrossRef CAS.
  7. L. Budai, O. Ozohanics, K. Ludányi, L. Drahos, T. Kremmer, J. Krenyacz and K. Vékey, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2009, 393, 991–998 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. X.-Q. Zhang, R. T. Schooley and J. G. Gerber, J. Infect. Dis., 1999, 180, 1833–1837 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. J. A. Bilello, P. A. Bilello, K. Stellrecht, J. Leonard, D. W. Norbeck, D. J. Kempf, T. Robins and G. L. Drusano, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 1996, 40, 1491–1497 CAS.
  10. R. Carr, L. Di Bari, S. Lo Piano, D. Parker, R. D. Peacock and J. M. Sanderson, Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 13154 RSC.
  11. R. Carr, R. Puckrin, B. K. McMahon, R. Pal, D. Parker and L. O. Pålsson, Methods Appl. Fluoresc., 2014, 2, 024007 CrossRef PubMed.
  12. L. Jennings, R. S. Waters, R. Pal and D. Parker, ChemMedChem, 2017, 12, 271–281 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. S. Shuvaev, R. Pal and D. Parker, Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 6724–6727 RSC.
  14. (a) E. J. New, D. Parker and R. D. Peacock, Dalton Trans., 2009, 672–679 RSC; (b) C. P. Montgomery, E. J. New, R. D. Peacock and D. Parker, Chem. Commun., 2008, 4261–4263 RSC; (c) D. M. Dias, J. M. C. Teixeira, I. Kuprov, E. J. New, C. F. G. C. Geraldes and D. Parker, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 5047–5050 RSC.
  15. M. P. Lowe and D. Parker, Chem. Commun., 2000, 707–708 RSC.
  16. M. P. Lowe and D. Parker, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2001, 317, 163–173 CrossRef CAS.
  17. R. Pal and D. Parker, Chem. Commun., 2007, 474–476 RSC.
  18. D. G. Smith, B. K. McMahon, R. Pal and D. Parker, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 8520 RSC.
  19. K. Binnemans and C. Görller-Walrand, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1995, 245, 75–78 CrossRef CAS.
  20. A. Borel, J. F. Bean, R. B. Clarkson, L. Helm, L. Moriggi, A. D. Sherry and M. Woods, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 2658–2667 CrossRef PubMed.
  21. (a) K. Mason, N. J. Rogers, E. A. Suturina, I. Kuprov, J. A. Aguilar, A. S. Batsanov, D. S. Yufit and D. Parker, Inorg. Chem., 2017, 56, 4028–4038 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) E. A. Suturina, K. Mason, C. F. G. C. Geraldes, I. Kuprov and D. Parker, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 2017, 56, 12215–12218 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) C. Piguet, C. F. G. C. Geraldes, Handb. Phys. Chem. Rare Earths, 2003, vol. 33, pp. 353–463 Search PubMed; (d) B. Bleaney, J. Magn. Reson., 1972, 8, 91–100 CAS.
  22. (a) M. Baldassarre, R. Galeazzi, B. Maggiore, F. Tanfani and A. Scirè, Biochimie, 2014, 102, 19–28 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) T. K. Harris and G. J. Turner, Life, 2002, 53, 85–98 CAS.
  23. R. A. Poole, F. Kielar, S. L. Richardson, P. A. Stenson and D. Parker, Chem. Commun., 2006, 4084 RSC.
  24. (a) I. Fitos, J. Visy, F. Zsila, G. Mády and M. Simonyi, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj., 2006, 1760, 1704–1712 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) H. Xuan and D. S. Hage, Anal. Biochem., 2005, 346, 300–306 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. (a) J. X. Mazoit, L. S. Cao and K. Samii, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 1996, 276, 109–115 CAS; (b) S. Taheri, L. P. Cogswell, A. Gent and G. R. Strichartz, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 2003, 304, 71–80 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. (a) M. P. Lowe, O. Reany, S. Aime, M. Botta, G. Castellano, E. Gianolio and D. Parker, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 7601–7609 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) T. Krchova, V. Herynek, A. Galisova, J. Blahut, P. Hermann and J. Kotek, Inorg. Chem., 2017, 56, 2078–2091 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. M. Vonci, K. Mason, E. A. Suturina, A. T. Frawley, I. Kuprov, E. J. L. McInnes, D. Parker and N. F. Chilton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 14166–14172 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c8sc00482j

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018