Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Regioselective Simmons–Smith-type cyclopropanations of polyalkenes enabled by transition metal catalysis

Jacob Werth and Christopher Uyeda *
Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. E-mail:

Received 10th November 2017 , Accepted 23rd December 2017

First published on 2nd January 2018

A [i−PrPDI]CoBr2 complex (PDI = pyridine-diimine) catalyzes Simmons–Smith-type reductive cyclopropanation reactions using CH2Br2 in combination with Zn. In contrast to its non-catalytic variant, the cobalt-catalyzed cyclopropanation is capable of discriminating between alkenes of similar electronic properties based on their substitution patterns: monosubstituted > 1,1-disubstituted > (Z)-1,2-disubstituted > (E)-1,2-disubstituted > trisubstituted. This property enables synthetically useful yields to be achieved for the monocyclopropanation of polyalkene substrates, including terpene derivatives and conjugated 1,3-dienes. Mechanistic studies implicate a carbenoid species containing both Co and Zn as the catalytically relevant methylene transfer agent.


Cyclopropanes are common structural elements in synthetic and natural biologically active compounds.1 The Simmons–Smith cyclopropanation reaction was first reported over half a century ago but remains today one of the most useful methods for converting an alkene into a cyclopropane.2 As compared to diazomethane, which is shock sensitive and must be prepared from complex precursors, CH2I2 is both stable and readily available, making it an attractive methylene source. Additionally, the stereospecificity of the Simmons–Smith reaction allows diastereomeric relationships in cyclopropanes to be established with a high degree of predictability. Several advances have addressed many of the limitations of the initial Simmons–Smith protocol. For example, Et2Zn can be used in the place of Zn to more reliably and quantitatively generate the active carbenoid reagent.3 Acidic additives, such as CF3CO2H4 and substituted phenols,5 have been found to accelerate the cyclopropanation of challenging substrates. Finally, Zn carbenoids bearing dialkylphosphate anions6 or bipyridine ligands7 are sufficiently stable to be stored in solution at low temperatures (Fig. 1).
image file: c7sc04861k-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Factors governing alkene selectivity in Zn carbenoid-mediated cyclopropanation reactions. Cobalt-catalyzed reductive cyclopropanation exhibiting high regioselectivities in polyalkene substrates based on alkene substitution patterns.

Despite the many notable contributions in Zn carbenoid chemistry, a persistent limitation of Simmons–Smith-type cyclopropanations is their poor selectivity when attempting to discriminate between multiple alkenes of similar electronic properties. For example, the terpene natural product limonene possesses a 1,1-disubstituted and a trisubstituted alkene. Friedrich reported that, under a variety of Zn carbenoid conditions, the two alkenes are cyclopropanated with similar rates, resulting in mixtures of monocyclopropanated (up to a 5[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 ratio of regioisomers) and dicyclopropanated products.8 This issue is exacerbated by the challenge associated with separating the two monocyclopropane regioisomers, which only differ in the position of a non-polar CH2 group. In general, synthetically useful regioselectivities in Simmons–Smith reactions are only observed for substrates containing directing groups.9

In principle, catalysis may provide an avenue to address selectivity challenges in Simmons–Smith-type cyclopropanations; however, unlike diazoalkane transfer reactions, which are catalyzed by a broad range of transition metal complexes,9b,10 there has been comparatively little progress toward the development of robust catalytic strategies for reductive cyclopropanations.11 Lewis acids in substoichiometric loadings have been observed to accelerate the Simmons–Smith reaction, but in many cases, this rate effect is restricted to allylic alcohol substrates.12,13

Recently, our group described an alternative approach to catalyzing reductive cyclopropanation reactions using a transition metal complex that is capable of activating the dihaloalkane reagent by C–X oxidative addition. A dinickel catalyst was shown to promote methylene14 and vinylidene15 transfer using CH2Cl2 and 1,1-dichloroalkenes in combination with Zn as a stoichiometric reductant. Here, we describe a mononuclear [PDI]Co (PDI = pyridine-diimine) catalyst16 that imparts a high degree of steric selectivity in the cyclopropanation of polyalkene substrates. Mechanistic studies suggest that the key intermediate responsible for methylene transfer is a heterobimetallic conjugate of Co and Zn.

Results and discussion

4-Vinyl-1-cyclohexene contains a terminal and an internal alkene of minimal electronic differentiation and thus provided a suitable model substrate to initiate our studies (Table 1).8,17 Under standard CH2I2/Et2Zn conditions (entry 1), there is a modest preference for cyclopropanation of the more electron-rich disubstituted alkene (rr = 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]6.7) with increasing amounts of competing dicyclopropanation being observed at higher conversions (entries 2 and 3). Other modifications to the conditions, including the use of a Brønsted acid4 (entry 4) or a Lewis acid additive12b,18 (entry 5), did not yield any improvements in selectivity. Likewise, an Al carbenoid generated using CH2I2 and AlEt3 afforded a similar preference for cyclopropanation of the endocyclic alkene (entry 6).19
Table 1 Regioselectivity studies using Zn and Al carbenoid reagentsa

image file: c7sc04861k-u1.tif

Entry Reaction conditions Yield (3 + 4) rr (3[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]4) Yield 5
a Reaction conditions: 4-vinylcyclohexene (0.14 mmol), CH2Cl2 (1.0 mL), 24 h, 22 °C. Yields and ratios of regioisomers were determined by GC analysis against an internal standard.
1 CH2I2 (1.0 equiv.), Et2Zn (0.5 equiv.) 28% 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]6.7 3%
2 CH2I2 (1.0 equiv.), Et2Zn (1.0 equiv.) 33% 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]4.6 5%
3 CH2I2 (2.0 equiv.), Et2Zn (2.0 equiv.) 53% 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]6.5 16%
4 CH2I2 (1.0 equiv.), Et2Zn (1.0 equiv.), 3,5-difluorobenzoic acid (2.0 equiv.) 28% 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]3.5 19%
5 CH2I2 (2.0 equiv.), Et2Zn (2.0 equiv.), TiCl4 (0.2 equiv.) 13% 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]4.6 1%
6 CH2I2 (1.2 equiv.), AlEt3 (1.2 equiv.) 38% 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]3.1 9%

In a survey of transition metal catalysts, the [i−PrPDI]CoBr2 complex 1 was identified as a highly regioselective catalyst for the cyclopropanation of 4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene, targeting the less hindered terminal alkene (Table 2). CH2Br2 and Zn alone do not afford any background levels of cyclopropanation (entry 1); however, the addition of 6 mol% [i−PrPDI]CoBr2 (1) provided monocyclopropane 3 (81% yield) with a >50[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 rr and <1% of the dicyclopropane product (entry 5). The steric profile of the catalyst appears to be critically important for yield. For example, the mesityl- (entry 6) and phenyl-substituted variants (entry 7) of the ligand provided only 58% and 4% yield respectively under the same reaction conditions. Related N-donor ligands similarly afforded low levels of conversion (entries 8–12) as did the use of other first-row transition metals, including Fe (entry 14) and Ni (entry 15), in the place of Co.

Table 2 Catalyst structure–activity relationship studiesa

image file: c7sc04861k-u2.tif

Entry Metal source Ligand Yield (3 + 4) rr (3[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]4) Yield 5
a Reaction conditions: 4-vinylcyclohexene (0.14 mmol), THF (1.0 mL), 24 h, 22 °C. Yields and ratios of regioisomers were determined by GC analysis against an internal standard.
1 <1% <1%
2 CoBr2 <1% <1%
3 Co(DME)Br2 <1% <1%
4 i−PrPDI <1% <1%
5 CoBr2 i−PrPDI 81% >50[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 <1%
6 CoBr2 MePDI 58% >50[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 <1%
7 CoBr2 PhPDI 4% <1%
8 CoBr2 i−PrDAD <1% <1%
9 CoBr2 i−PrIP 2% <1%
10 CoBr2 Terpy 4% <1%
11 CoBr2 t−BuPyBOX <1% <1%
12 CoBr2 PhPyBOX <1% <1%
13 CoBr2 PPh3 (12 mol%) <1% 0%
14 FeBr2 i−PrPDI 3% <1%
15 NiBr2 i−PrPDI <1% <1%

In order to define the selectivity properties of catalyst 1, we next conducted competition experiments using alkenes bearing different patterns of substitution (Fig. 2). Reactions were carried out using an equimolar amount of each alkene and run to full conversion of the limiting CH2Br2 reagent (1.0 equiv.). Monosubstituted alkenes are the most reactive class of substrates using 1 but are not adequately differentiated from 1,1-disubstituted alkenes (3[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1). By contrast, terminal alkenes are significantly more reactive than internal alkenes, providing synthetically useful selectivities (≥31[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1). Furthermore, a model Z-alkene was cyclopropanated in preference to its E-alkene congener in a 33[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 ratio. Using catalyst 1, trisubstituted alkenes are poorly reactive, and no conversion is observed for tetrasubstituted alkenes.

image file: c7sc04861k-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Intermolecular competition experiments probing selectivity based on alkene substitution patterns. Reactions were conducted using a 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 molar ratio of the two alkene starting materials and CH2Br2.

The synthetic applications of the catalytic regioselective cyclopropanation were examined using the terpene natural products and derivatives shown in Fig. 3. In all cases, the selectivity properties follow the trends established in the competition experiments. Substrates containing ether or free alcohol functionalities (e.g., 7, 10, and 11) exhibit a strong directing group effect under classical Simmons–Smith conditions; however, catalyst 1 overrides this preference and targets the less hindered alkene. Additionally, the presence of electron-deficient α,β-unsaturated carbonyl systems (e.g., 9, 13, and 14) do not perturb the expected steric selectivity.

image file: c7sc04861k-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Catalytic regioselective monocyclopropanations of terpene natural products and derivatives. Isolated yields following purification are averaged over two runs.

Vinylcyclopropanes are a valuable class of synthetic intermediates that engage in catalytic strain-induced ring-opening reactions.20 The monocyclopropanation of a diene represents an attractive approach to their synthesis but would require a catalyst that is capable of imparting a high degree of regioselectivity and avoiding secondary additions to form dicyclopropane products.21 These challenges are addressed for a variety of diene classes using catalyst 1 (Fig. 4). Over the substrates that we have examined, the selectivities for cyclopropanation of the terminal over the internal double bond of the diene system are uniformly high. Additionally, the catalyst is tolerant of vinyl bromide (15) and vinyl boronate (23) functional groups, which are commonly used in cross-coupling reactions.

image file: c7sc04861k-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Catalytic regioselective monocyclopropanations of 1,3-dienes. Isolated yields following purification are averaged over two runs.

Like the non-catalytic Simmons–Smith reaction,2c the cyclopropanation using 1 is stereospecific within the limit of detection, implying a mechanism in which the two C–C σ-bonds are either formed in a concerted fashion or by a stepwise process that does not allow for single bond rotation. For example, cyclopropanation of the Z-alkene 24 affords the cis-disubstituted cyclopropane 25 in 95% yield as a single diastereomer (Fig. 5a). Furthermore, the vinylcyclopropane substrates 26 and 28, commonly used as tests for cyclopropylcarbinyl radical intermediates, react without ring-opening to afford products 27 and 29 (Fig. 5b).

image file: c7sc04861k-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Mechanistic studies probing the concertedness of cyclopropane formation.

Under standard catalytic conditions, the reaction mixtures using 1 adopt a deep violet color, which persists until complete consumption of the alkene. The UV-vis spectrum of the catalytic mixture at partial conversion is consistent with a Co(I) resting state (Fig. 6a). The authentic [i−PrPDI]CoBr complex (30) can be prepared by stirring the [i−PrPDI]CoBr2 complex 1 over excess Zn metal.22 Cyclic voltammetry data (Fig. 6b) indicates an E1/2 for the Co(II)/Co(I) redox couple of −1.00 V vs. Fc/Fc+. The large peak-to-peak separation (0.96 V in 0.3 M [n-Bu4N][PF6]/THF) is characteristic of a slow bromide dissociation step following electron transfer. The second Co(I)/Co(0) reduction event is significantly more cathodic at −1.93 V and is inaccessible using Zn.

image file: c7sc04861k-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Mechanistic studies probing the nature of the active carbenoid intermediate. (a) Identification of the catalyst resting state. (b) Cyclic voltammetry data for the [i−PrPDI]CoBr2 complex. (c) Stoichiometric cyclopropanation reactions using the [i−PrPDI]CoBr2 complex in the absence and presence of ZnBr2. (d) A proposed Co/Zn carbenoid species. (e) Proposed dinuclear mechanism for the Lewis acid-accelerated Simmons–Smith reaction. (f) Solid-state structure for the [i−PrPDI]CoBr2Zn(THF/Et2O)Br2 complex (31). The solvent molecule bound to Zn is disordered between Et2O and THF. Only the THF-bound structure is shown for clarity.

In order to decouple the cyclopropanation steps of the mechanism from catalyst turnover, we conducted stoichiometric reactions with the isolated [i−PrPDI]CoBr complex in the absence of Zn (Fig. 6c). The reaction of 30 with 4-vinylcyclohexene and CH2Br2 generates the [i−PrPDI]CoBr2 complex 1 within 24 h at room temperature but forms cyclopropanated products in a relatively low combined yield of 26%, which is not commensurate with the efficiency of the catalytic process. Furthermore, the regioselectivity is only 3[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, whereas the catalytic cyclopropanation achieves a >50[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 selectivity for this substrate. When the same stoichiometric reaction is conducted in the presence of ZnBr2, the yield and selectivity of the catalytic process is fully restored.

The Co-containing product (31) of the stoichiometric reaction in the presence of ZnBr2 is green, which is notably distinct from the tan color of the [i−PrPDI]CoBr2 complex 1. This green species is NMR silent but may be crystallized from saturated solutions in Et2O to afford 31 (Fig. 6f). The solid-state structure reveals the expected [i−PrPDI]CoBr2 fragment in a distorted square pyramidal geometry (τ5 = 0.36) with a Zn(THF/Et2O)Br2 Lewis acid coordinated to one of the Br ligands. This interaction induces an asymmetry in the structure, causing the Co–Br1 distance (2.557(1) Å) to be elongated relative to the Co–Br2 distance (2.358(2) Å).

Collectively, these studies suggest that both Co and Zn are present in the reactive carbenoid intermediate, and that ZnBr2 may interact with the [i−PrPDI]Co complex through Lewis acid–base interactions. There is a notable similarity between the observed Co/Zn effect and previous studies of Lewis acid acceleration in the Simmons–Smith cyclopropanation. For example, Zn carbenoid reactions are known to be accelerated by the presence of ZnX2,12c which is generated as a byproduct of the reaction. DFT calculations conducted by Nakamura have suggested that the origin of this rate acceleration may be due to the accessibility of a five-membered ring transition state, which requires the presence of an additional Zn equivalent to function as a halide shuttle.23


In summary, transition metal catalysis provides a pathway to accessing unique selectivity in reductive carbenoid transfer reactions. A [i−PrPDI]CoBr2 complex functions as a robust catalyst for Simmons–Smith type cyclopropanation using a CH2Br2/Zn reagent mixture. This system exhibits the highest regioselectivities that have been observed in reductive cyclopropanations based solely on the steric properties of the alkene substrate. Accordingly, a range of terpenes and conjugated dienes may be converted to a single monocyclopropanated product. Ongoing studies are directed at exploring the applications of transition metal catalysts to other classes of carbenoid transfer reactions.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.


This work was supported by Purdue University and the National Institutes of Health (R35GM124791). We thank Dr Matthias Zeller for assistance with XRD experiments. XRD data were collected using an instrument funded by the NSF (CHE-1625543). C. U. is an Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellow.

Notes and references

  1. (a) J. Salaun and M. Baird, Curr. Med. Chem., 1995, 2, 511–542 CAS; (b) W. A. Donaldson, Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 8589–8627 CrossRef CAS; (c) L. A. Wessjohann, W. Brandt and T. Thiemann, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 1625–1648 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) N. A. Meanwell, J. Med. Chem., 2011, 54, 2529–2591 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) D. Y. K. Chen, R. H. Pouwer and J.-A. Richard, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 4631–4642 RSC.
  2. (a) H. E. Simmons and R. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1958, 80, 5323–5324 CrossRef CAS; (b) H. E. Simmons and R. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1959, 81, 4256–4264 CrossRef CAS; (c) A. B. Charette and A. Beauchemin, Org. React., 2001, 58, 1–415 CAS.
  3. (a) J. Furukawa, N. Kawabata and J. Nishimura, Tetrahedron Lett., 1966, 7, 3353–3354 CrossRef; (b) J. Furukawa, N. Kawabata and J. Nishimura, Tetrahedron, 1968, 24, 53–58 CrossRef CAS.
  4. (a) Z. Yang, J. C. Lorenz and Y. Shi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 8621–8624 CrossRef CAS; (b) J. C. Lorenz, J. Long, Z. Yang, S. Xue, Y. Xie and Y. Shi, J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 327–334 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. A. B. Charette, S. Francoeur, J. Martel and N. Wilb, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 4539–4542 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. A. Voituriez, L. E. Zimmer and A. B. Charette, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 1244–1250 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. A. B. Charette, J.-F. Marcoux, C. Molinaro, A. Beauchemin, C. Brochu and É. Isabel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 4508–4509 CrossRef CAS.
  8. There is some conflicting data in the literature regarding the regioselectivity of Zn carbenoid addition to limonene; however, the most recent and comprehensive studies have found that mixtures of regioisomers are formed and that the product ratios depend on the reaction conditions: (a) S. D. Koch, R. M. Kliss, D. V. Lopiekes and R. J. Wineman, J. Org. Chem., 1961, 26, 3122–3125 CrossRef CAS; (b) H. E. Simmons, E. P. Blanchard and R. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964, 86, 1347–1356 CrossRef CAS; (c) E. C. Friedrich and F. Niyati-Shirkhodaee, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 2202–2205 CrossRef CAS.
  9. (a) A. H. Hoveyda, D. A. Evans and G. C. Fu, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 1307–1370 CrossRef CAS; (b) H. Lebel, J.-F. Marcoux, C. Molinaro and A. B. Charette, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 977–1050 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. (a) H. Nozaki, S. Moriuti, M. Yamabe and R. Noyori, Tetrahedron Lett., 1966, 7, 59–63 CrossRef; (b) M. P. Doyle, Chem. Rev., 1986, 86, 919–939 CrossRef CAS; (c) M. P. Doyle, M. A. McKervey and T. Ye, Modern catalytic methods for organic synthesis with diazo compounds, Wiley, 1998 Search PubMed; (d) H. Pellissier, Tetrahedron, 2008, 64, 7041–7095 CrossRef CAS.
  11. Photoredox catalysts for reductive cyclopropanation reactions: (a) A. M. del Hoyo, A. G. Herraiz and M. G. Suero, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 1610–1613 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) A. M. del Hoyo and M. García Suero, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2017, 2017, 2122–2125 CrossRef CAS.
  12. (a) H. Takahashi, M. Yoshioka, M. Ohno and S. Kobayashi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1992, 33, 2575–2578 CrossRef CAS; (b) A. B. Charette and C. Brochu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 11367–11368 CrossRef CAS; (c) S. E. Denmark and S. P. O'Connor, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 584–594 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) A. B. Charette, C. Molinaro and C. Brochu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 12168–12175 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) H. Shitama and T. Katsuki, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 2450–2453 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) J. Balsells and P. J. Walsh, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 5005–5008 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. J. Long, H. Du, K. Li and Y. Shi, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 2737–2740 CrossRef CAS.
  14. Y.-Y. Zhou and C. Uyeda, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 3171–3175 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. S. Pal, Y.-Y. Zhou and C. Uyeda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 11686–11689 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. Seminal studies and selected reviews of catalytic reactions using (PDI)Co complexes: (a) B. L. Small, M. Brookhart and A. M. A. Bennett, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 4049–4050 CrossRef CAS; (b) G. J. P. Britovsek, V. C. Gibson, S. J. McTavish, G. A. Solan, A. J. P. White, D. J. Williams, G. J. P. Britovsek, B. S. Kimberley and P. J. Maddox, Chem. Commun., 1998, 849–850 RSC; (c) V. C. Gibson, C. Redshaw and G. A. Solan, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 1745–1776 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) C. Bianchini, G. Giambastiani, L. Luconi and A. Meli, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2010, 254, 431–455 CrossRef CAS; (e) Z. Flisak and W.-H. Sun, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 4713–4724 CrossRef CAS; (f) P. J. Chirik, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 5170–5181 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. U. Burger and R. Huisgen, Tetrahedron Lett., 1970, 11, 3057–3060 CrossRef.
  18. E. C. Friedrich, S. E. Lunetta and E. J. Lewis, J. Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 2388–2390 CrossRef CAS.
  19. K. Maruoka, Y. Fukutani and H. Yamamoto, J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50, 4412–4414 CrossRef CAS.
  20. (a) T. Hudlicky, T. M. Kutchan and S. M. Naqvi, Org. React., 1985, 33, 247–335 CAS; (b) J. E. Baldwin, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 1197–1212 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) T. Hudlicky and J. W. Reed, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 4864–4876 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) Y. Gao, X.-F. Fu and Z.-X. Yu, in CC Bond Activation, Springer, 2014, pp. 195–231 Search PubMed; (e) L. Souillart and N. Cramer, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 9410–9464 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. A. J. Anciaux, A. Demonceau, A. F. Noels, R. Warin, A. J. Hubert and P. Teyssié, Tetrahedron, 1983, 39, 2169–2173 CrossRef CAS.
  22. M. J. Humphries, K. P. Tellmann, V. C. Gibson, A. J. P. White and D. J. Williams, Organometallics, 2005, 24, 2039–2050 CrossRef CAS.
  23. (a) E. Nakamura, A. Hirai and M. Nakamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 5844–5845 CrossRef CAS; (b) M. Nakamura, A. Hirai and E. Nakamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 2341–2350 CrossRef CAS PubMed.


Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures and characterization data. CCDC 1584851. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c7sc04861k

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018