Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Long-term leaching behaviours of cement composites prepared by hazardous wastes

Zhenzhou Yanga, Ji Rud, Lili Liua, Xidong Wanga and Zuotai Zhang*bc
aBeijing Key Laboratory for Solid Waste Utilization and Management, Department of Energy and Resource Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
bSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, P. R. China. E-mail: zhangzt@sustc.edu.cn
cThe Key Laboratory of Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Technology and Management of Shenzhen City, Shenzhen, 518055, P. R. China
dSchool of Civil and Resource Engineering University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, P. R. China

Received 30th March 2018 , Accepted 26th July 2018

First published on 2nd August 2018


Abstract

In order to evaluate the long-term environmental impact of Eco-Ordinary Portland Cement (EOPC) prepared by municipal solid wastes (MSS) and hazardous wastes (HW), consecutive leaching tests with a time span of 180 days were conducted on the EOPC composites in the compact and ground forms under deionized and saline water conditions. The results show that the heavy metals investigated can be classified into three groups according to their leaching behaviours. The concentrations of V, Pb, Ni, Ba, Cd and Zn in the leachate increase with the leaching time, which can be classified into the first group. Cu and Sn are in the second group, and their concentrations increase initially, and decline afterward. Cr and As are in the third group, and their concentrations decline firstly, followed by a clear increase. Besides, a kinetic study was also conducted in the present study, revealing that the leaching behaviours of heavy metals follow a second-order model. Furthermore, our results suggest that the EOPC is resistant to the saline water, but the application of such materials in marine conditions should be paid attention to due to the pollution of arsenic.


1. Introduction

The effective disposal of municipal sewage sludge (MSS) and hazardous wastes (HW) has become a serious problem that attracts public concern. According to the statistics, the production of MSS in China has reached 30 million tons per year,1 while the generation of HW is 15.87 million tons nowadays.2 The most common ways to dispose these two wastes are landfill and incineration.3–5 However, these two methods have their own disadvantages. For example, the reduction of land resources and pollutant emission (e.g. leachate and landfill gas) limit the application of landfill.6 Besides, some hazardous substances such as heavy metals and organics can also be released during the incineration process, which can be harmful to the environment and human health. Although some new methods such as gasification, pyrolysis and digestion have been proposed for the disposal of MSS and HW recently,7–9 the problems of energy-extensive consumption and the complicated operation restrict the large-scale applications of those methods. Thus, an appropriate approach for the innocuous disposal of these two wastes is urgently needed.

The integrated utilization of wastes in cement kiln has multiple advantages. Firstly, the high temperature in cement kiln can completely destroy the hazardous organic substances and benefit the environment. Secondly, the wastes can be alternative fuel and raw materials, which can save energy and resources at the same time. Finally, the co-process of wastes in cement kiln can also receive additional subsidy from the government. However, it should be noted that the application of materials involving wastes might threaten the environment and human health.10,11 Thus, the environmental impacts caused by the release of pollutants, especially for the heavy metals are strongly needed to be evaluated during their usage period. Nowadays, many studies have conducted the researches on the leaching behaviors of cementitious materials added with wastes. However, the leaching time in those studies is always in a short period12–14 and little studies ever stressed on the long-term environmental impact during the application of those materials. It is known that the short-term leaching can over- or under-estimate the potential leaching of contaminants, which might provide the misled information for the decision makers.15 Thus, the long-term leaching test is extremely needed to be conducted in this study. To date, multiple leaching protocols have been proposed to evaluate the leaching characteristics of the building and waste materials. For example, Dutch leaching tests 7345 based on the diffusion was established,14 which uses the replenished leaching solvent to evaluate the dissolution of inorganic components in the waste materials during a specific period (6 h to 64 days). Later, the NEN 7375 protocol was also proposed to estimate the dissolution of inorganic components from the intact stony building and waste materials in the deionized water condition. Besides, another leaching test, such as CEN/TS 16637-2 test and EPA 1315 were proposed to estimate the hazardous substances from the intact or granular materials. It should be noted that leaching process of those protocols are in the replenished leaching solvent or in a short period. To evaluate the long-term leaching behaviors of cement composites containing wastes in the intact and granular forms in stagnant environmental waters, the modified NEN 7375 protocol was applied in this study, as described in the previous literature.10,11,16,17 The ground composites simulated the mortar decomposed over time upon usage and the crush of the cement product before their reutilization. In addition, the investigation on the ground composites in different particle sizes could also help to study the law of dynamics during the heavy metal leaching process.

In the present study, long-term leaching behaviors of cement composites prepared by MSS and HW are investigated. For this purpose, the leaching test based on modified NEN 7375 lasting 180 days was conducted. The cement composites in the compact and ground forms were leached in the deionized water and saline water, simulating the surface water and marine conditions, respectively. Our study is expected to provide useful insights to understand the releasing mechanism of heavy metals from the cement composites prepared by HW and MSS, which can stress the environmental issues on the application of such cement composites containing waste materials and highlight the importance of the public health protection measure.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

The Eco-Ordinary Portland Cement (EOPC) obtained from the Beijing Cement Plant was used in the present study, which is classified in P.O. 42.5 according to standard GB175-2007. The cement plant chooses the MSS and HW to substitute part of raw materials to produce cement clinker. The MSS with the moisture content of 80% was obtained from a sewage treatment plant in Beijing, China. The HW is the mixtures, including waste mineral, paint sludge, printing ink, electroplating sludge, and etc., which have been described in our previous study.18

2.2 Materials characterization

The chemical compositions of EOPC were determined by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF, S4-Explore, Bruker), while the mineral phases were identified by X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D/Max 2500, Rigaku). Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS, XSERIES 2, Thermo Scientific) was used for the heavy metals detection in the EOPC and the quality control is described in ESI. Before the ICP-MS measurement, a microwave digestion was applied for the digestion of EOPC. Briefly, about 0.5 g of EOPC was digested in an acid mixture of HNO3 (69%, 5 mL) and HF (40%, 1 mL), and the residual liquid was heated at 120 °C for the removal of HF. The detailed digested procedures have already been described in the literature.19 Besides, the mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP, Autopore IV 9510, Micromeritics) was used to measure the characterization of porosity of cement composites.

2.3 Preparation of cement composites

The cement composites in this study were prepared by EOPC, aggregate and deionized water. The aggregate used in this study was the standard sand from the Xiamen ISO Standard Sand Co., LTD. The deionized water was produced from a Barnstead NANOpure ultrapure water system (Barnstead, Thermo Scientific, USA) with the resistivity of 18 ± 1 M Ω cm−1. The cement/aggregate/water weighted ratio was 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]3[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.5 and the size of the cement composite was 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm. The mechanical property test was subsequently conducted on the cement composites according to the GB/T 17671-1999. It should be noted that two kinds of cement composites (compact and ground) were prepared in this study. The ground composites were prepared by the crush of compact ones and can be classified into coarse particles (particle size ∼1 cm), and fine particle (particle size ∼1 mm). The compact composites simulate the intact mortars, while the ground composites simulate the different levels of decomposition of the intact mortars during their usage period.

2.4 Long-term leaching test

To evaluate the long-term leaching behaviors of the cement composites containing wastes, the modified NEN 7375 protocol was applied in this study. Herein, two leaching solvents, deionized water and saline water were applied. Deionized water was used to simulate the surface water. Saline water with 3.8 wt% NaCl was prepared according to the standard GB8650-88, which was used to simulate the marine condition. The leaching test was conducted in a polyethylene vessel with the liquid–solid ratio of 5[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1. During the leaching process, every 10 mL samples was taken after 3, 7, 14, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 days. Then, the pH values and the conductivities of samples were measured by the pH meter (MP 220, Mettler-Toledo) and conductivity meter (FE 30, Mettler-Toledo). Besides, the heavy metals concentrations in the samples were also determined by the ICP-MS. After the whole leaching process, the cement composites were taken out for the mechanical strength tests. All the tests were run in triplicate to check the reproducibility.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Characterization of EOPC

Table 1 shows the elemental compositions of EOPC. It can be seen that CaO, SiO2 and Al2O3 are the main components in EOPC. Besides, EOPC also contains multiple heavy metals, and Mn, Zn and Ba show the higher concentration compared to other heavy metals. XRD patterns (Fig. 1) shows that tricalcium silicate (C3S), dicalcium silicate (C2S), tricalcium aluminate (C3A) and tetra-calcium aluminoferrite (C4AF) are the predominant mineral phases in the EOPC sample, which is similar with the commercial cement.20
Table 1 Main chemical composition of EOPC (wt% by weight)a
Sample CaO SO3 SiO2 MgO Al2O3 Na2O TiO2 K2O P2O5 LOI
a Nd: not detected.
EOPC 53.8 2.8 22.6 4.1 8.0 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.2 3.2

Sample As Ba Cd Co Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn Mn V Sn
EOPC 94 157 0.6 3 4.4 19 9 23 101 673 30 Nd



image file: c8ra02773k-f1.tif
Fig. 1 XRD pattern of EOPC.

3.2 Long-term leaching behaviors of the EOPC composite

To evaluate the long-term leaching behaviors of the cement composites prepared by EOPC, the modified NEN 7375 test was applied on the EOPC composites in the compact and ground forms. The pH and the conductivity values of the leachate are shown in Table S1. It can be seen that, the pH value of the leachate is notably high, in the range of 11 and 13. This can be attributed to the presence of soluble Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 in the cement composites, which is also in accordance with the previous study.21 Besides, the pH values of leachate from ground composites are obviously higher than those from the compact ones, which can be due to the higher specific area in the ground composites, resulting in the elevated leachability of alkaline species. Conductivity can indicate the ionic strength of the leachate. The results show that, the ionic strength of the leachate in the saline water is much higher than that in the deionized water. Besides, the ionic strength of leachate from ground composites is also higher than that from the compact ones. The higher ionic strength in the saline water can be attributed to the higher concentrations of ions, such as Na+ and Cl in the leaching solvent.21 Besides, the higher specific area in the ground composites can promote the leaching of ions (Ca2+, K+, Na+, OH, SO42−, and etc.), which can elevate the value of ionic strength of the leachate. It also can be seen that the conductivity of the leachate increases rapidly at first, but declines slightly afterward. This can be due that, firstly, the ions can be dissolved in leachate rapidly, which can elevate the conductivity of the leachate.22 With the hydration going on, Ca2+ and some anions can be adsorbed by the hydrated product such as ettringite (AFt), which can thereby decrease the conductivity of the leachate.23 In addition, the pH value of leachate declines slowly with the leaching time, which can be ascribed to the aqueous carbonation effect, and the similar phenomenon was also observed in the previous study.24

The concentrations range of heavy metals in the leachate under different conditions and the maximum values set by the corresponding regulation are shown in Table 2. It can be seen that, most heavy metals show the low leachability and the concentrations of them are much lower than the corresponding regulation. This can be attributed to the high pH value in the leachate (Table S1). Under the high alkaline conditions, most heavy metals can be precipitated. The occurrences of heavy metals can be calculated according to the geochemical model, which has been shown in the previous study.25 For example, Ni can precipitate as Ni(OH)2.25 Besides, the formation of Ni–Al layered double hydroxide (LDH) phases under the alkaline condition can also stabilize Ni in the leachate.26 Zn can be stabilized by the precipitation of CaZn2(OH)5·2H2O (calcium zincate) at the alkaline condition,27 and the similar reaction was also observed for Cu and Pb.25 Besides, the heavy metals can also be incorporated in hydrate phases of C–S–H, AFt and monosulphate (AFm) in the cement composites. It is known that some heavy metals in the forms of oxyanionic species, such as CrO42− and MoO42− can replace the SO42− in AFt and AFm, then can be incorporated in the mineral phases.23 Moreover, some heavy metals such as Cd, Pb, Zn, and etc. can also substitute Ca2+ in C–S–H, AFm and AFt by ion exchange.25 Although the concentrations of most heavy metals are below the limitation of regulation, the concentration of As exceeds the corresponding regulation in the saline water. This indicates that the pollution of As should be prevented when this kind of material is implemented in the marine condition. As can be seen that, the concentrations of most heavy metals in the leachate from ground composites are higher than those from compact composites. These elements also show higher leachability in the fine particle compared to those in the coarse particle, which can be attributed to the higher specific area in ground composite and fine particles. It is well known that the pH value can significantly affect the leaching of heavy metals and the minimum leaching of heavy metals usually occurred in the neutral condition.28 Thus, in order to control the leaching of heavy metals, some measures must be taken to decrease the pH value of the leachate.

Table 2 The concentration (μg L−1) ranges of the elements in the deionized and saline leachates from compact, coarse particle and fine particle composites prepared with EOPC during the course of the experiment (180 days)a
Element Dw (compact) Dw (coarse particle) Dw (fine particle) Sw (compact) Sw (coarse particle) Sw (fine particle) Maximum permitted values
a Dw: deionized water; Sw: saline water; —: not regulated.
Cr 0.9–3.5 0.7–1.4 1.1–2.2 41.3–49.3 34.8–55.8 36.3–44.5 300
Ba 12–124 593–3625 444–4604 103–310 1223–4726 1135–5389
V 0.3–1.6 2.7–11.6 3.3–11.5 0.3–2.1 3.3–12.8 5.2–11.4
Ni 3.7–17.3 21.1–103.3 30.4–142.3 34.4–61.4 55.2–93.5 59.5–95.8 300
Cu 1.3–4.5 4.7–13.0 3.8–14.1 12.9–24.9 19.5–35.2 20.4–33.3 1000
Zn 0.01–8.5 0.01–10.3 0.01–14.0 0.01–11.6 0.01–14.9 0.01–8.4 1000
As 0.01–0.6 0.01–0.7 0.01–0.7 0.01–364 0.01–274 0.01–361 100
Cd 0.01–0.02 0.01–0.04 0.01–0.04 0.01–0.1 0.1–0.7 0.3–0.8 100
Pb 0.01–0.04 0.3–3.0 0.2–3.6 0.2–0.8 0.2–5.2 0.3–5.5 300
Sn 0.01–0.35 0.01–0.21 0.01–0.13 0.01–0.84 0.01–0.97 0.01–0.79


According to the different leaching behaviors, we can classify the heavy metals into three groups. In the first group, the concentrations of V, Pb, Ni, Cd, Ba and Zn in the leachate increase parabolically with the leaching time, indicating the leaching of those heavy metals are controlled by the dissolution and diffusion. However, the leaching behaviors of some heavy metals in this group show some differences. For example, the concentration of V in the leachate from the compact composites is much higher than that from the ground composites (Fig. 2). This can be due that higher content of Ca2+ can be leached out in the ground composites because of the higher surface area. The reaction between the Ca2+ and V can be thereby promoted, forming the insoluble phase of calcium vanadate.29 Besides, V is usually in the presence of VO43− in the alkaline condition.25 The smaller particle sizes of cement composites can cause the higher pH value in the leachate (Table S1), which can promote the substitution of VO43− in AFt and AFm. Thus, the concentration of V in the leachate from the ground composites is lower than that from the compact ones. By contrast, the leaching concentration of Pb from the ground cement composites is obviously higher than that from the compacts ones (Fig. 3). This indicates that the leaching of Pb is determined by the surface area of the cement composite. Besides, since Pb is predominantly precipitated at the pH around 10, the higher pH value in the leachate from the ground composites can increase its leachability.30 Therefore, in order to prevent the leaching of Pb, the crushed EOPC composites should be avoided, unless included into other compact building materials. In the second group, the leaching of Cu and Sn increases firstly, but declines afterwards with the leaching time (taking the Sn as an example shown in Fig. 4). The declination can be attributed to the presence of hydroxide from some heavy metals such as iron and manganese, which can be played as adsorbents and impede the leaching of Cu and Sn.25,31 In the third group, the leaching of Cr and As declines initially, then followed by a clear increase (taking the Cr as an example shown in Fig. 5). The declination can be attributed to the substitution in ettringite-type phases, which is also in accordance with the previous study.25 Later, the concentrations of Cr and As increase as more Cr and As can be leached out with the increase of leaching time.


image file: c8ra02773k-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Leaching of V with deionized water and saline water over time, from the tested compact, coarse particle and fine particle: (a) deionized water; (b) saline water.

image file: c8ra02773k-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Leaching of Pb with deionized water and saline water over time, from the tested compact, coarse particle and fine particle: (a) deionized water; (b) saline water.

image file: c8ra02773k-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Leaching of Sn with deionized water and saline water over time, from the tested compact, coarse particle and fine particle: (a) deionized water; (b) saline water.

image file: c8ra02773k-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Leaching of Cr with deionized water and saline water over time, from the tested compact, coarse particle and fine particle: (a) deionized water; (b) saline water.

3.3 Kinetic study

In order to explore the leaching mechanism of heavy metals during the long-term leaching process, the kinetic study under the different conditions was conducted. For the description of solid–liquid reacted system, multiple kinetic models, such as reaction-controlled and diffusion-controlled models have been proposed. However, the results demonstrate that those kinetic models did not show a good agreement with the experimental data. Thus, another kinetic model must be provided to describe the leaching process in this study. Considering the observation from this study that, most of heavy metals in the cement composites are released quickly at first, then the leaching process becomes much slower. Finally, the equilibrium state can be reached. This indicates that the kinetic model might follow the second-order law. The general form of the second-order kinetic model has been described previously by Lee et al.,32 which is shown in eqn (1),
 
image file: c8ra02773k-t1.tif(1)
where Ct is the concentration of heavy metals in the leachate in the time of t. Cs is the concentration of heavy metals in the leachate at the equilibrium state, while K (L mg−1 min−1) is the rate constant of reaction. The slope 1/Cs and the intercept 1/KCs2 can be calculated by the linear fitting between the t/Ct and t. Herein, we take the Pb for an example, and Table 3 shows the fitting results under different conditions. The results show that the coefficients of determination (R2) of the fitting values are all above 0.95, and the similar results are also found in other heavy metals. This indicates that the diffusion is the controlling leaching mechanism during the heavy metals leaching process. As a kind of porous materials, cement composites contain a large number of intercommunicating pores and closed pores (Fig. S1). Thus, the leaching process can be described as: firstly, the heavy metals adhered on the surface of the cement composites can be leached out rapidly due to the driving force of the fresh water and a reacted layer with fewer heavy metals was subsequently appeared. In this step, the concentrations of heavy metals in the leachate will increase rapidly. In the second step, the heavy metals inside the cement composites can be diffused out through the reacted layer, then enter the liquid phase through the water firm. Due to the higher concentrations of heavy metals in the leachate, the leaching rate is much slower in this step because of the weak drive of mass transfer. Besides, the refractory phases in the cement composites might act as a blocker, hinder the diffusion of heavy metals in the closed pores or in the matrix of cement composites. Further, the hydration of cement composites lasts all the time during the leaching process, which will lead to a denser structure of cement composites, and thus increase the diffusion resistance. As aforementioned, we can propose some methods to control the leaching of heavy metals. For example, in the first step, we can slow down the flow velocity of water because the external diffusion is dominant. Further, the crushed cement composites should be avoided in second step due to the leaching rates of heavy metals are controlled by the internal diffusion in this step.
Table 3 Determination coefficients (R2) if various kinetic models for the leaching of Pb
Leaching condition State of cement composite R2
Deionized water Compact 0.962
Coarse particle 0.995
Fine particle 0.996
Saline water Compact 0.983
Coarse particle 0.965
Fine particle 0.981


3.4 The mechanical strength test

The mechanical property of compact cement composites before and after the leaching process is shown in Fig. 6. It can be seen that the compressive strength of cement composites before leaching is much lower than that after leaching. The leaching medium can determine the strength of cement composites in two aspects.33 Firstly, the leaching medium can provide the hydrated environment for the cement composite, which can promote the formation of a denser structure, resulting in the higher strength of the composites. Secondly, H+ in the leaching medium can corrode the structure of cement composite, which can damage its strength. In this study, the corrosion caused by the H+ is impeded because the highly alkaline condition (Table S1) and the ongoing hydrated process can benefit for the strength of the cement composites. As can be seen that, the compressive strength of cement composites prepared by EOPC in saline water is lower than those in deionized water, which might be due to the corrosive effect caused by the chloride.34 In addition, the MIP test is also conducted to describe the porosity parameters of the cement composites after the leaching process and the results are displayed in Table S2 and Fig. 7. The results show that the composites leaching in the saline water contain the lowest overall porosity. The most probable reason can be attributed to the formation of Friedel's salt, which can cause the refinement and reduction of the pore volume.35 Furthermore, a criterion to identify the resistant/durable ability of materials in saline water was also proposed in our study as a corrosion index (Ic), which can be calculated by the relative strength of samples in saline water to those stored in water.36 The Ic of the cement composites prepared by EOPC is 0.8, higher than the general value of 0.7, which is resistant to saline water.
image file: c8ra02773k-f6.tif
Fig. 6 The mechanical properties of OPEC under different leaching environment: (a) flexural strength (b) compressive strength.

image file: c8ra02773k-f7.tif
Fig. 7 Pore size distribution curves, determined by MIP, for the investigated compact composites prepared by EOPC, after 180 days of exposure to deionized water and saline water.

4. Conclusion

The long-term leaching behaviors of cement composites prepared by EOPC are investigated in this study. Compact and ground (coarse particle and fine particle) cement composites are prepared and the leaching test based on the modified NEN 7375 procedure is conducted in deionized water and saline water with a time span of 180 days. Our results show that concentrations of most heavy metals are below the limitation of corresponding regulation, except for the As in the saline water condition. Besides, we can classify the heavy metals into three groups. In the first group, the concentrations of V, Pb, Ni, Cd, Ba and Zn in the leachate increase with the leaching time. Cu and Sn are classified into the second group; the concentrations of them increase initially, then decline afterward. The concentrations of Cr and As decline firstly, followed by a clear increase, and they can be classified into the third group. The kinetic study indicates that the leaching of heavy metals follows a second-order model. Furthermore, our results point out that the cement composites prepared by EOPC are irresistible against saline water, but the application of such a material in the marine environment should be careful due to the pollution of As.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (51522401) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (51472007, 51772141). This work was also supported financially by Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee (ZDSYS201602261932201, JCYJ20170412154335393, KQTD2016022619584022). Additional support was provided by the Southern University of Science and Technology (Grant No. G01296001) and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Control (Grant No. 2017B030301012).

References

  1. B. Xiao, Q. Dai, X. Yu, P. Yu, S. Zhai, R. Liu, X. Guo, J. Liu and H. Chen, Effects of sludge thermal-alkaline pretreatment on cationic red X-GRL adsorption onto pyrolysis biochar of sewage sludge, J. Hazard. Mater., 2017, 343, 347–355 CrossRef PubMed.
  2. H. S. Shi and L. L. Kan, Characteristics of municipal solid wastes incineration (MSWI) fly ash–cement matrices and effect of mineral admixtures on composite system, Constr. Build. Mater., 2009, 23, 2160–2166 CrossRef.
  3. M. B. Folgueras, M. Alonso and R. M. Díaz, Influence of sewage sludge treatment on pyrolysis and combustion of dry sludge, Energy, 2013, 55, 426–435 CrossRef.
  4. T. Murakami, Y. Suzuki, H. Nagasawa, T. Yamamoto, T. Koseki, H. Hirose and S. Okamoto, Combustion characteristics of sewage sludge in an incineration plant for energy recovery, Fuel Process. Technol., 2009, 90, 778–783 CrossRef.
  5. H. B. Zhou, C. Ma, D. Gao, T. B. Chen, G. D. Zheng, J. Chen and T. H. Pan, Application of a recyclable plastic bulking agent for sewage sludge composting, Bioresour. Technol., 2014, 152, 329 CrossRef PubMed.
  6. J. Jin, M. Wang, Y. Cao, S. Wu, P. Liang, Y. Li, J. Zhang, J. Zhang, M. H. Wong and S. Shan, Cumulative effects of bamboo sawdust addition on pyrolysis of sewage sludge: Biochar properties and environmental risk from metals, Bioresour. Technol., 2017, 228 Search PubMed.
  7. I. Petersen and J. Werther, Experimental investigation and modeling of gasification of sewage sludge in the circulating fluidized bed, Chem. Eng. Process., 2005, 44, 717–736 CrossRef.
  8. M. Inguanzo, A. DomíNguez, J. A. Menéndez, C. G. Blanco and J. J. Pis, On the pyrolysis of sewage sludge: the influence of pyrolysis conditions on solid, liquid and gas fractions, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2002, 63, 209–222 CrossRef.
  9. P. Sosnowski, A. Wieczorek and S. Ledakowicz, Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic fraction of municipal solid wastes, Adv. Environ. Res., 2003, 7, 609–616 CrossRef.
  10. A. Drinčić, I. Nikolić, T. Zuliani, R. Milačič and J. Ščančar, Long-term environmental impacts of building composites containing waste materials: Evaluation of the leaching protocols, Waste Manage., 2017, 340–349 CrossRef PubMed.
  11. T. Šturm, R. Milačič, S. Murko, M. Vahčič, A. Mladenovič, J. S. Šuput and J. Ščančar, The use of EAF dust in cement composites: assessment of environmental impact, J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 166, 277–283 CrossRef PubMed.
  12. R. Bie, P. Chen, X. Song and X. Ji, Characteristics of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash with cement solidification treatment, J. Energy Inst., 2016, 89, 704–712 CrossRef.
  13. H. Shi and Y. Ling, Cementitious reactivity of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash and immobilization effect by cement, J. Chin. Ceram. Soc., 2003, 31, 1021–2025 Search PubMed.
  14. I. Hohberg, G. J. D. Groot, A. M. H. V. D. Veen and W. Wassing, Development of a leaching protocol for concrete, Waste Manage., 2000, 20, 177–184 CrossRef.
  15. H. Lee, G. Yu, Y. Choi, E. H. Jho and K. Nam, Long-term leaching prediction of constituents in coal bottom ash used as a structural fill material, J. Soils Sediments, 2017, 1–10 Search PubMed.
  16. M. Vahcic, R. Milacic, A. Mladenovic, S. Murko, T. Zuliani, M. Zupancic and J. Scancar, Leachability of Cr(VI) and other metals from asphalt composites with addition of filter dust, Waste Manage., 2008, 2, 2667–2674 CrossRef PubMed.
  17. R. Milaä, T. Zuliani, T. Oblak, A. Mladenoviä and J. Å. AnäAr, Environmental impacts of asphalt mixes with electric arc furnace steel slag, J. Environ. Qual., 2011, 40, 1153–1161 CrossRef PubMed.
  18. Z. Yang, Y. Chen, Y. Sun, L. Liu, Z. Zhang and X. Ge, The partitioning behavior of trace element and its distribution in the surrounding soil of a cement plant integrated utilization of hazardous wastes, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 2016, 23, 13943 CrossRef PubMed.
  19. L. Qi, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, M. Chen, X. Ge, Y. Ma, J. Zheng, Z. Wang and S. Li, Source identification of trace elements in the atmosphere during the second Asian Youth Games in Nanjing, China: influence of control measures on air quality, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 2016, 7, 547–556 CrossRef.
  20. S. Yang, H. Song and R. Xie, XRD Study of Hydration Rate of Cement, J. Instrum. Anal., 1996, 15, 73–76 Search PubMed.
  21. V. Z. Serjun, A. Mladenovič, B. Mirtič, A. Meden, J. Ščančar and R. Milačič, Recycling of ladle slag in cement composites: Environmental impacts, Waste Manage., 2015, 43, 376–385 CrossRef PubMed.
  22. A. Princigallo, K. V. Breugel and G. Levita, Influence of the aggregate on the electrical conductivity of Portland cement concretes, Cem. Concr. Res., 2003, 33, 1755–1763 CrossRef.
  23. M. Zhang and E. J. Reardon, Removal of B, Cr, Mo, and Se from Wastewater by Incorporation into Hydrocalumite and Ettringite, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2003, 37, 2947 CrossRef PubMed.
  24. Z. Yang, S. Tian, R. Ji, L. Liu, X. Wang and Z. Zhang, Effect of water-washing on the co-removal of chlorine and heavy metals in air pollution control residue from MSW incineration, Waste Manage., 2017, 68, 221–231 CrossRef PubMed.
  25. C. J. Engelsen, H. A. V. D. Sloot, G. Wibetoe, H. Justnes, W. Lund and E. Stoltenberg-Hansson, Leaching characterisation and geochemical modelling of minor and trace elements released from recycled concrete aggregates, Cem. Concr. Res., 2010, 40, 1639–1649 CrossRef.
  26. A. M. Scheidegger, E. Wieland, A. C. Scheinost, A. Rainer Dähn and P. Spieler, Spectroscopic Evidence for the Formation of Layered Ni–Al Double Hydroxides in Cement, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2000, 34, 4545–4548 CrossRef.
  27. F. Ziegler and C. A. Johnson, The solubility of calcium zincate (CaZn(OH)2·HO), Cem. Concr. Res., 2001, 31, 1327–1332 CrossRef.
  28. V. D. S. Ha, D. S. Kosson and Z. A. Van, Leaching, geochemical modelling and field verification of a municipal solid waste and a predominantly non-degradable waste landfill, Waste Manage., 2017, 63, 74 CrossRef PubMed.
  29. A. Shahnazi, F. Rashchi and E. Vahidi, A Kinetics Study on the Hydrometallurgical Recovery of Vanadium from LD Converter Slag in Alkaline Media, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012 Search PubMed.
  30. G. E. Voglar and D. Leštan, Equilibrium leaching of toxic elements from cement stabilized soil, J. Hazard. Mater., 2013, 25, 246–247 Search PubMed.
  31. J. Tang and B. M. Steenari, Leaching optimization of municipal solid waste incineration ash for resource recovery: A case study of Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd, Waste Manage., 2016, 48, 315–322 CrossRef PubMed.
  32. I. H. Lee, Y. J. Wang and J. M. Chern, Extraction kinetics of heavy metal-containing sludge, J. Hazard. Mater., 2005, 123, 112 CrossRef PubMed.
  33. Z. Makhloufi, E. H. Kadri, M. Bouhicha, A. Benaissa and R. Bennacer, The strength of limestone mortars with quaternary binders: Leaching effect by demineralized water, Constr. Build. Mater., 2012, 36, 171–181 CrossRef.
  34. Q. F. Liu, G. L. Feng, J. Xia, J. Yang and L. Y. Li, Ionic transport features in concrete composites containing various shaped aggregates: a numerical study, Compos Struct., 2017, 183, 371–380 CrossRef.
  35. J. Liu, F. Xing, B. Dong, H. Ma and D. Pan, Study on water sorptivity of the surface layer of concrete, Mater. Struct., 2014, 47, 1941–1951 CrossRef.
  36. M. Frias, S. Goñi, R. García and R. V. D. L. Villa, Seawater effect on durability of ternary cements. Synergy of chloride and sulphate ions, Composites, Part B, 2013, 46, 173–178 CrossRef.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c8ra02773k

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018