Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Potent and selective inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases by lanthanide trichloride

Yanyan Wanga, Ye Wangb, Song Anb, Jinrui Zhangb, Yuqian Hana, Jinge Xua, Fang Yua, Dahai Yub and Xuexun Fang*b
aSchool of Biological Engineering, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China
bKey Laboratory for Molecular Enzymology and Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science, Jilin University, 2699 Qianjin Street, Changchun, 130012, P. R. China. E-mail: fangxx@jlu.edu.cn; Fax: +86-0431-85155200; Tel: +86-0431-85155249

Received 29th January 2018 , Accepted 20th March 2018

First published on 17th April 2018


Abstract

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of Zn-containing and Ca-dependent proteases with vital roles in extracellular matrix remodeling. Deregulation of MMPs occurs in many pathological conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, inflammation, and cancer. The therapeutic potential of MMP inhibitors has been demonstrated in diseases such as arthritis and cancer. Here we demonstrated that the 3-valent lanthanide compounds LaCl3, TbCl3, GdCl3, YbCl3, and EuCl3 inhibit MMPs such as MMP-2, MMP-13, and MMP-14 (MT1-MMP). The inhibition is more potent and selective toward MT1-MMP compared to the other MMPs. EuCl3 was further selected to study the enzyme kinetics of the MT1-MMP inhibition. The results showed that the inhibition is a mixed type with anti-competition and non-competitive types, which indicated that inhibition was achieved by the compound bound to the non-active center of MT1-MMP and changing the enzyme conformation. The interaction between EuCl3 and MT1-MMP was further studied by UV-visible (UV-vis) light absorption. EuCl3 caused a slight blue shift of the maximum absorption wavelength of MT1-MMP, indicating the interaction reduced protein hydrophobicity. Moreover, EuCl3 exerted substantial inhibitory effects on the migration of HT-1080 cells. Thus, EuCl3 may play a role in modulating tumor cell behavior by inhibiting MMPs activities especially the MT1-MMP activity. These findings provide initial insight into the biological activity and potential therapeutic value of EuCl3.


1 Introduction

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of Zn-containing and Ca-dependent endopeptidases known to degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) components. MMPs are involved in numerous physiological and pathological courses, such as embryogenesis,1 organ development,2 wound healing,3 tumor,4,5 cardiovascular diseases,6 arthritis,7 nervous system disease,8 and respiratory diseases.9 MMPs can be divided into the following subgroups: collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, and stromelysin-like MMPs, matrilysins, membrane-type (MT) MMPs, and other MMPs.10,11

MT1-MMP is the only membrane-anchored MMP that promotes cancer cell invasion12 and enables tumor stromal cells to encourage cancer cell growth,13 angiogenesis,14 inflammatory cell invasion,15 and cartilage degradation by synovial pannus.16,17 MT1-MMP is considered as a therapeutic target for cancer18 and rheumatoid arthritis.16 Therefore, MT1-MMP must be inhibited in a specific manner. Different attempts have been conducted to synthesize selective inhibitors. However, most MT1-MMP inhibitors are organic compounds and antibody, and only few inorganic inhibitors have been reported.19–22 Our previous work on the effect of trivalent Al and Fe on MMPs revealed that these trivalent metal salts and their complexes all significantly affect the MMPs activity and the cell migratory and invasive capability. So we speculate that some other trivalent metal ions may also have the similar biological activity.

The 3-valent lanthanide compounds are all rare-earth elements that can generate trivalent compounds with similar chemical properties. Rare-earth metals are divided into two categories on the basis of electronic structure and chemical and physical properties as follows: light and heavy rare-earth metals. Given their antibacterial, antiviral, and antitumor activities, the 3-valent lanthanide compounds play an important role in disease-associated biological processes.23–27 The interaction of the europium ion (Eu3+) with the protein α-amylase, an important digestive enzyme in saliva and pancreatic juice, has been studied over wide ranges of pH and concentration. The protein provides three independent, non-cooperative binding sites for Eu3+.23 Reports indicated that the 3-valent lanthanide compounds affect tumor cell growth and MMP expression.22,24,25 A study found that LaCl3 exerts a concentration-dependent inhibitory effect on invasive tumor cells, and LaCl3 (<50 μmol L−1) inhibits the activity and expression of pro-MMP-2 but does not suppress the activated form of MMP-2.24 The inhibitory activities of different valence metal compounds demonstrate that the lanthanide elements (EuCl3, LaCl3, and PrCl3) can inhibit the protein activity of cdMMP-13.22 The antibacterial and antiviral activities of lanthanide element organic coordination compounds have also been investigated.25 We previously showed that trivalent aluminum salts and iron salts exert inhibitory effects on MMPs and hinder the tumor migration and metastasis without affecting cell viability26,27. However, the inhibitory effects of the 3-valent lanthanide compounds on MT1-MMP and the protein's related diseases have been rarely explored.

In this study, we aimed to test the effect of the 3-valent lanthanide compounds (LaCl3, TbCl3, GdCl3, YbCl3, and EuCl3) on the activities of three MMPs. Then, the inhibition type of EuCl3 was further selected to study the enzyme kinetics of the MT1-MMP inhibition, because their inhibition is more potent and selective toward MT1-MMP compared to the other MMPs. Moreover conformational change of MT1-MMP and effect of EuCl3 on tumor cell behaviors at the cellular level were explored. This research is meaningful for understanding the role of trivalent metal complexes in regulating MMP activity.

2 Experimental procedures

2.1 Materials and reagents

The human fibrosarcoma carcinoma cell line HT-1080 were obtained from the ATCC (Rockville, MD). DQ-gelatin was purchased from Invitrogen. Gelatin was obtained from Sigma. The other reagents and solvents used in the experiments were of analytical or reagent grade, as deemed appropriate.

2.2 Expression and purification of recombinant proteases

The recombinant catalytic domains of human MMP-2, MMP-13, and MT1-MMP were expressed in Escherichia coli, purified, and refolded in our laboratory.28 After purification, the bioactivities of proteins and inhibition of MMP broad-spectrum inhibitors (Gm 6001) were examined using FLx800 fluorescence microplate reader. These recombinant proteases were applied for subsequent enzymatic experiments.

2.3 Enzyme activity assay

An FLx800 fluorescence microplate reader (Bio-Tek) was used to measure MMP activity. DQ-gelatin was employed as the substrate. Kinetic assays were conducted at 37 °C in 50 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) containing 0.2 M NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 20 μM ZnSO4, and 0.05% Brij-35. For inhibition assays, the 3-valent lanthanide compounds were incubated with an appropriate quantity of MMPs for 45 min to ensure that equilibrium was reached before the fluorescent substrate was added. The inhibitory extent was determined using the initial rates with and without the inhibitor. The FLx800 fluorescence microplate reader (Bio-Tek) was also used to measure cathepsin activity, with z-Phe-Arg-AMC as the substrate. Other reagents are as follows: for cathepsin K: 50 mM MEs, and 5 mM DTT (pH 5.5); for cathepsin L: 0.4 M NaOAc, 4 mM EDTA, and 8 mM DTT (pH 5.5). For enzyme inhibition assays, activity data were fitted into a linearized curve by using Origin version 7.5. IC50 values were then determined from the curve accordingly.

2.4 Enzyme kinetics of EuCl3 on MT1-MMP

To analyze inhibition type, we performed further kinetic analysis of the inhibition of the lanthanide metallic compound EuCl3 of MT1-MMP. We selected 1 μg mL−1 as the final enzyme concentration. The final inhibitor concentrations were selected as 0, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 μM, respectively, in accordance with the detected IC50 = 0.53 μM during the inhibition of MT1-MMP by EuCl3. Substrates with different final concentrations (0.5–7 μg mL−1) were added. Inhibition type was identified using Lineweaver–Burk and Dixon plots.29,30

2.5 UV-vis

UV-vis absorption spectroscopy was conducted at 298 K on a UV-2550 spectrophotometer equipped with 1.0 cm quartz cells. UV spectroscopy (200–500 nm wavelength) was recorded. Appropriate buffer solution running under the same conditions was considered as blank and subtracted from the sample spectra.

2.6 Cell culture and measurement of cell viability (MTT)

The human fibrosarcoma carcinoma cell line HT-1080 was cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) supplemented with penicillin (100 units per mL) and streptomycin (100 μg mL−1) at 37 °C and under 5% CO2. HT1080 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well in 200 μL of DMEM containing 10% FBS. At 24 h after seeding, the medium was removed, and the cells were incubated for 24 h with DMEM containing 10% FBS in the absence or presence of various concentrations of metal complex. Subsequently, 200 μL of DMEM and 20 μL of 5 mg mL−1 MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) solution was added to each well. The plates were placed in an incubator at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 4 h. Afterward, the medium was replaced with 150 μL of DMSO, and absorbance was recorded at 490 nm.

2.7 Cell wound healing assay

The migration rate was measured by wound healing assay.31 HT-1080 cells were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells per well in 200 μL of DMEM containing 10% FBS. At 24 h after seeding, 200 μL was used to create scratches of the same width at the bottom of the plate. The medium was removed, and the samples were washed with PBS and then photographed under a microscope. The cells were incubated for 24 h with DMEM containing 10% FBS in the absence or presence of various EuCl3 concentrations. The migrated cells were quantified on the basis of two photographic results.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 EuCl3 suppressed MT1-MMP activity in a dose-dependent manner

Our previous work on the effect of trivalent Al and Fe on MMPs revealed that these trivalent metal salts and their complexes all significantly influence MMPs activity and the cell migratory and invasive capability.27 The significant inhibition of MMPs by these inorganic trivalent metal salts is a new discovery in the field of MMP inhibitors. Notably, lanthanide metallic compounds are trivalent compounds. MMP-2, MMP-13, and MT1-MMP belong to gelatinases, collagenases, and membrane MMPs, respectively. With different substrate degradation specificities, the enzymes can degrade various types collagen and gelatin, and participate in multiple physiological or pathological processes that require ECM remodeling. The excessive expression of these MMPs is closely associated with the migration, infiltration, and transfer of cancer cells.32–34

In the experiment, we selected several representative lanthanide compounds, namely, light rare-earth metallic compounds LaCl3, GdCl3, and EuCl3 and heavy rare earth metallic compounds TbCl3 and YbCl3, to analyze their effects on the activities of MMP-2, MMP-13, and MT1-MMP. Enzyme experiments demonstrated that with increasing concentration, the lanthanide compounds exert a significantly inhibited the MMP-2, MMP-13, and MT1-MMP activities, with IC50 values in the micromolar range (Table 1). The inhibition was selective toward MT1-MMP compared to other MMPs. Moreover, the suppressive effect (IC50 of 0.53 μM) of EuCl3 on MT1-MMP was stronger than those of MMP-2 and MMP-13 (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Control experiments with fluorogenic substrate in the presence of lanthanide compounds alone was performed in the absence of the MMPs. Additionally, studies have shown that rare-earth metal ions had inhibitory activity to MMP-16 (MT3-MMP) with IC50 3.5–14.5 μmol L.35

Table 1 IC50 of lanthanide compounds on MMPs (MMP-2, MMP-13, and MT1-MMP) and cathepsins (cathepsin K and L)a
Lanthanide compounds IC50 (μM)
MMP-2 MMP-13 MT1-MMP Cathepsin K Cathepsin L
a “NI” means no inhibition was observed for the activity of the corresponding enzyme under 10 μM lanthanide metallic compounds. The standard deviation value represent standard errors from three replicates.
LaCl3·7H2O 9.50 ± 0.24 13.20 ± 0.16 3.50 ± 0.13 NI NI
EuCl3·6H2O 10.03 ± 0.58 7.88 ± 0.22 0.53 ± 0.06 NI NI
GdCl36H2O 8.40 ± 0.22 4.81 ± 0.17 0.80 ± 0.18 NI NI
TbCl3·6H2O 6.20 ± 0.32 8.00 ± 0.25 0.68 ± 0.13 NI NI
YbCl3·6H2O 5.03 ± 0.17 12.68 ± 0.12 5.40 ± 0.25 NI NI



image file: c8ra00871j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Dose-dependent inhibition effect of the lanthanide metallic compounds on MT1-MMP. (A–E): MT1-MMP activity inhibition rate; (F) IC50 of Eu3+ on MT1-MMP. the IC50 values were then determined from the curve accordingly. Data are presented as the mean values (n = 3). The activity data were fitted in a linearised curve using origin version 7.5. The IC50 values were then determined from the curve accordingly.

To analyze whether lanthanide compounds can specifically inhibit MMPs, we selected cathepsin family members (cathepsin K and L) with different catalytic mechanisms for enzyme activity analysis of the MMP family. Cathepsins are classified into the cysteine protease family, which contains a cysteine residue in the catalytic sites; this residue initiates proteolysis cascade reactions. Cathepsins play a key role in promoting the occurrence and development of tumors. cathepsin K and MMP-9 overexpression can promote the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells.36 The proliferation and growth of tumor cells harboring the silenced cathepsin L gene are retarded, and the invasion is significantly reduced.37 Lanthanide compounds at a final concentration of 10 μM exerted no inhibitory effect on the two cathepsins (Table 1). The inhibition of three recombinant proteases (MMP-2, MMP-13, and MT1-MMP) and cathepsins (cathepsin K and L) by lanthanide compounds were compared. Results showed that the lanthanide compounds successfully inhibited the three MMPs, with relative specificity for MT1-MMP.

3.2 Inhibition types of EuCl3 on MT1-MMP

Because inhibition of lanthanide compounds is more potent and selective toward MT1-MMP compared to the other MMPs, and the suppressive effect of EuCl3 on MT1-MMP was stronger than lanthanide compounds, we conducted further dynamic analysis on the inhibition of MT1-MMP by EuCl3. Different enzyme concentrations were added to the test system, and the same amounts of substrate and inhibitor were added. In the experiments, 1 μg mL−1 was selected as the final enzyme concentration for analyzing the inhibitory type. The corresponding final inhibitor concentrations were 0, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 μM, which were based on the detected IC50 = 0.53 μM during the EuCl3-mediated inhibition of MT1-MMP, and substrates at different final concentrations (0.5–7 μg mL−1) were added. Fig. 2A and B display the plots on the Michaelis–Menten and Lineweaver–Burk equations, respectively. With increasing inhibitor concentration from 0 μM to 0.2 μM, Km and Vmax obviously diminished. With further increase from 0.2 μM to 0.6 μM, Km became constant, whereas Vmax decreased. Therefore, the observed inhibition was a combination of non-competition and anti-competition. Meanwhile, the Dixon equation plots were used to obtain Fig. 2C. The two straight lines (substrate concentrations of 3 and 4 μg mL−1) intersected at the second quadrant with the intersection point as −Ki. The results suggest that the inhibition is a combination of non-competition and anti-competition inhibition, that is, the inhibitor combined the compounds with the non-active center of MMP and altered the structure and conformation of MMP. This discovery has not been reported.
image file: c8ra00871j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Mixed-type inhibition kinetics of EuCl3 on MT1-MMP activity. (A) MT-MMP activity in the presence of different EuCl3 and substrate concentrations. (B) Lineweaver–Burk plot; EuCl3 concentrations were 0 (closed diamond), 0.2 (closed squares), 0.4 (closed triangles), and 0.6 μm (closed circles). (C) Dixon plots of the reversible enzyme inhibitors. The substrate concentrations for curves 1–4 were 2, 3, 4, and 5 μg mL−1, respectively.

3.3 EuCl3 effect on conformation by interaction with MT1-MMP

UV-vis absorption is commonly used to study the secondary structural alterations in proteins. We obtained the UV-vis absorption spectra of MT1-MMP in different EuCl3 concentrations. Absorptions were significantly enhanced as EuCl3 concentration increased. The hyperchromic effect and blue shift of the absorption spectrum showed an increased binding of EuCl3 and MT1-MMP and decreased hydrophobicity for light-emitting residues (Fig. 3). The effects of other lanthanides were not evident.
image file: c8ra00871j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 UV-vis absorption spectra of MT1-MMP in the presence of EuCl3 the MT1-MMP concentration was 10–5 mol L−1 in 50 mm HEPES buffer (ph 7.5) containing 0.2 m NaCl, 1 mm CaCl2, 20 μm ZnSO4, and 0.05% Brij-35. Measurement was conducted at 298 K.

MT1-MMP is synthesized with a signal peptide (Signal), a prodomian (Pro) for latency, a catalytic domain (Catalytic) with catalytic zinc atom (Zn) for proteolytic activity, a linker-1 (L1), a hemopexin domain (Hpx), a linker-2 (L2), a transmembrane domain (TM), and a cytoplasmic tail (CP). There is an RRKR motif at the border between the pro and catalytic domains which is recognized and cleaved by proprotein convertases (PCs) for activation.38 The catalytic Zn2+ ion is located near the protein surface, with the cleft above the metal site allowing binding of substrate peptides. In its resting state the Zn ion is coordinated by three His residues (His239, His243, His249 for MT1-MMP) and at least one water molecule which serves as the nucleophile during substrate hydrolysis.39,40 The pocket in the core domain is hydrophobic in nature, but variable in depth depending on the MMPs, representing a determining factor of substrate specificity of MMPs. The depth and the length of the S1′ pocket and amino acids all represent critical foundations for the design and synthesis of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors (MMPIs).41

They often have carboxylate or amide functions which provide strong interactions with the lanthanide cation, but differ in the structure of the molecular edifice. The different strategies developed up to now may be divided into four categories: (i) easy to reach acyclic structures incorporating a heteroaromatic (poly) cycle fitted with chelating groups based on the EDTA, DTPA or TTHA scaffold, (ii) podand-type receptors where anionic functionalized heteroaromatic moieties are attached to a single atom (nitrogen, carbon) or a small aromatic ring such as benzene, (iii) predisposed macrocyclic structures bearing coordinating and sensitizing units, (iv) more elaborate structures such as rigid cryptand-like macrobicyclic architectures14 or ligands based on self-assembly processes.42 Other researches have reported that Eu3+ has coordination role with oxygen and N, similar to iron ions. Moreover, the report points out: Fe3+ has been described as interacting with 3 His residues in Zn binding site of MMPs. However, enzyme kinetics result showed that Eu3+ interacts with the inactive regions of MT1-MMP.

Research has shown that positively charged metal ion can interact with negatively charged amino acids.43 On the basis of enzymology experiments, we selected the negatively charged amino acids Glu and Asp around the active pocket of MT1-MMP and performed molecular docking. Results revealed that these two amino acids induced metal complexation with Eu3+ (Fig. 4A and B). Docking energy analysis results indicated strong interaction between Eu3+ and Asp. Findings on enzyme kinetics showed that Eu3+ can interact with the inactive regions of MT1-MMP at low concentrations; such interaction resulted in protein conformational changes. Then, the inhibitory mechanism shifted to anti-competitive mode with increased inhibitor concentration. Given the above results, we speculated that Eu3+ interacted with the negatively charged areas on the MT1-MMP surface at low concentrations. However, the red areas were gradually saturated by Eu3+ with increasing inhibitor concentration. Eu3+ interacted with the light-red region near the active center of the zinc ions of MT1-MMP (areas of interaction between enzyme and substrate) (Fig. 4C and D). The interaction sites site between areas should be verified by further study.


image file: c8ra00871j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Predicted binding mode of EuCl3 with MT1-MMP. (A and B) Molecular docking of Eu3+ and negatively charged amino acids in MT1-MMP. (C and D) Charge distribution on the MT1-MMP surface. The red part is the negative charge, and the blue part is the positive charge. Deeper color indicates a stronger trend.

3.4 EuCl3 can effectively inhibit the migration behaviors of HT-1080 cells without affecting cell vitality

On the basis of the specific inhibitory effects on MT1-MMP, we examined the influences of EuCl3 on the behaviors of MT1-MMP-related tumor cells. MTT assay was applied to determine the toxicity of EuCl3 on HT-1080 cells. Results revealed that EuCl3 was not found cytotoxic above a concentration of 250 μM (Fig. 5A). However, cell viability suddenly decreased at concentrations exceeding 250 μM. This trend may be attributed to the sharp increase in cell permeability when chloroauric acid entered the cells; this occurrence eventually led to cell death and decreased cell viability. On the basis of the aforementioned results, 0–50 μM was selected as the drug concentration range in the subsequent cell experiments on the influence of the metallic compounds on tumor cell behavior without affecting cell vitality.
image file: c8ra00871j-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Eu3+-inhibits HT-1080 cell migration in a dose-dependent manner without affecting cell viability. (A) An in vitro study was initiated by treating HT-1080 cells with increasing doses of Eu3+ (0, 7.8125, 15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 μm) for 24 h. The viability of the Eu3+-treated cells was measured using MTT assay. Results are expressed as percentages of control experiments. (B) Approximately 1 × 105 cells were seeded into 24-well plates with cell culture inserts. At 24 h after seeding, 200 μL was used to create scratches with uniform width at the bottom of the plate. The medium was removed, samples were washed with PBS, and cells were photographed under microscope. Cells were subsequently incubated for 24 h with DMEM containing 10% FBS in the absence or presence of various concentrations of EuCl3 (0, 25, and 50 μm). After 24 h of incubation, cell migration was visualized under a microscope. (C) Cell migration ratio was calculated from the average total number of cells of three filters. Results are presented as the mean ± sd of three independent experiments. * indicates p < 0.05 compared with the controls. ** indicates p < 0.01 compared with the controls. Data are shown as mean ± sd from three independent experiments.

Migration rate was measured by cell wound healing assay. Wound healing assay is simple, inexpensive, and among the earliest developed methods for investigating directional cell migration in vitro. This method mimics cell migration during wound healing in vivo. The basic steps include creating a “wound” in a cell monolayer, capturing the images at the beginning and at regular intervals during cell migration to close the wound, and comparing the images to quantify the migration rate of the cells. This method is particularly suitable for studies on the effects of cell matrix by secreting hydrolytic enzymes, such as MMPs and cell–cell interactions on cell migration.44 As shown in Fig. 5B and C, the migration rate was decreased significantly with increasing lanthanide metallic compound concentration. When the final EuCl3 concentration was 25 μM, the migration rate was <50% relative to that of the control. When the final EuCl3 concentration was 50 μM, the migration rate declined to approximately 30%. Therefore, the aforementioned results show that EuCl3 exerts obvious concentration-dependent inhibitory effects on HT-1080 cell migration.

4 Conclusion

In this work, we found that lanthanide metallic compounds of Eu3+ can inhibit MT1-MMP activity. According to dynamic analysis results, inhibition was achieved by combining the compounds with the non-active center of MT1-MMP and changing the structure and conformation of the enzyme. UV-vis absorption results showed that EuCl3 caused a slight blue shift of the maximum absorption wavelength of MT1-MMP, denoting the decrease in hydrophobicity of the protein. The role of Eu3+ and amino acids were analyzed. These results showed that EuCl3 interacted with the recombinant MT1-MMP and inhibited MT1-MMP activity. Moreover, at 0–50 μM EuCl3 exerted significant inhibitory effects on cell migration but did not affect the cell viability of the human fibrosarcoma cells HT-1080. This research is highly meaningful for understanding the role of trivalent metal complexes in regulating MMP activity. However, questions regarding the exact MT1-MMP and Eu3+ sites, the nature of the Eu3+-induced MT1-MMP conformational change that reduced the activity level of the enzyme, and whether Eu3+ binding causes any dysfunction in MT1-MMP in vivo remain to be determined. These issues entail further detailed study on the interaction between MT1-MMP and Eu3+ and signal transduction pathways.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31100574 and 31370742) and from the Department of Education of Liaoning Province (no. 2016J048).

References

  1. P. Bischof and A. Campana, Baillière's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000, 14, 801–814 CAS.
  2. V. Srinivasan, D. W. Spence, A. Moscovitch, S. R. PandiPerumal, I. Trakht, G. M. Brown and C. D. P. Cardinali, J. Pineal Res., 2010, 48, 1–8 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. K. Ganguly, A. V. Sharma, R. J. Reiter and S. Swarnakar, J. Pineal Res., 2010, 49, 130–140 CAS.
  4. M. D. Sternlicht and Z. Werb, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 2001, 17463–17516 Search PubMed.
  5. M. Ege blad and Z. Werb, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2002, 2, 161–174 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. J. F. Dilmé, S. Bellmunt, M. Camacho, D. Solà-Villà, J. M. Romero, J. R. Escudero and L. Vila, Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg., 2014, 48, 374–381 CrossRef PubMed.
  7. J. M. Milner and T. E. Cawston, Curr. Drug Targets Inflamm. Allergy, 2005, 4, 363–375 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. P. S. Burrage and C. E. Brinckerhoff, Curr. Drug Targets, 2007, 8, 293–303 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. G. Murphy and H. Nagase, Nat. Rev. Rheumatol., 2008, 4, 128–135 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. E. Kerkelä and U. Saarialho-Kere, Exp. Dermatol., 2003, 12, 109–125 CrossRef.
  11. C. Amălinei, I. D. Căruntu and R. A. Bălan, Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol., 2007, 48, 323–334 Search PubMed.
  12. H. Sato, T. Takino, Y. Okada, J. Cao, A. Shinagawa, E. Yamamoto and M. Seiki, Nature, 1994, 370, 61–65 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. W. Zhang, L. M. Matrisian, K. Holmbeck, C. C. Vick and E. L. Rosenthal, BMC Cancer, 2006, 6, 52 CrossRef PubMed.
  14. T. H. Chun, F. Sabeh, I. Ota, H. Murphy, K. T. McDonagh, K. Holmbeck, H. Birkedal-Hansen, E. D. Allen and S. J. Weiss, J. Cell Biol., 2004, 167, 757–767 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. T. Sakamoto and M. Seiki, Genes Cells, 2009, 14, 617–626 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. F. Sabeh, D. Fox and S. J. Weiss, J. Immunol., 2010, 184, 6396–6406 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. M. C. Miller, H. B. Manning, A. Jain, L. Troeberg, J. Dudhia, D. Essex, A. Sandison, M. Seiki, J. Nanchahal, H. Nagase and Y. Itoh, Arthritis Rheum., 2009, 60, 686–697 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. M. Seiki, Cancer Lett, 2003, 194, 1–11 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. L. Devy, L. Huang, L. Naa, N. Yanamandra, H. Pieters, N. Frans, E. Chang, Q. Tao, M. Vanhove, A. Lejeune, R. van Gool, D. J. Sexton, G. Kuang, D. Rank, S. Hogan, C. Pazmany, Y. L. Ma, S. Schoonbroodt, A. E. Nixon, R. C. Ladner, R. Hoet, P. Henderikx, C. Tenhoor, S. A. Rabbani, M. L. Valentino, C. R. Wood and D. T. Dransfield, Cancer Res., 2009, 69, 1517–1526 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. A. M. Woskowicz, S. A. Weaver, Y. Shitomi, N. Ito and Y. Itoh, J. Biol. Chem., 2013, 288, 35126–35137 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. A. K. Chaudhary, S. Pandya, K. Ghosh and A. Nadkarni, Mutat. Res., 2013, 753, 7–23 CAS.
  22. H. Wen, Y. Qin, W. Zhong, C. Li, X. Liu and Y. Shen, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2016, 92, 9–17 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. A. Barkleit, A. Heller, A. Ikeda-Ohno and G. Bernhard, Dalton Trans., 2016, 45, 8724–8733 RSC.
  24. M. Valko, H. Morris and M. T. Cronin, Curr. Med. Chem., 2005, 12, 1161–1208 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. C. Shiju, D. Arish and S. Kumaresan, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 2013, 105, 532–538 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. Y. Wang, H. Lu, D. Yu, J. Zhang, W. Liang, Z. Zhang and X. Fang, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 17700–17708 RSC.
  27. Y. Shen, S. Liu, F. Jin, T. Mu, C. Li, K. Jiang, W. Tian, D. Yu, Y. Zhang and X. Fang, BioMetals, 2012, 25, 541–551 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. X. Shi, F. Jin, H. Wang, J. Yang, Z. Wang and X. Fang, Chem. Res. Chin. Univ., 2006, 22, 129–133 CrossRef CAS.
  29. X. Fang, Y. Zhan, J. Yang and D. Yu, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2014, 104, 1–7 CrossRef CAS.
  30. X. Zhang, L. Shi, X. Li, Q. Sheng, L. Yao, D. Shen, Z. R. Lü, H. M. Zhou, Y. D. Park, J. Lee and Q. Zhang, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 2014, 117, 696–705 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. J. Yang, Y. Shen, Y. Hong, F. Jin, S. Zhao, M. Wang, X. Shi and X. Fang, J. Ethnopharmacol., 2008, 117, 285–289 CrossRef PubMed.
  32. G. Ardif, P. Reboul, J. P. Pelletier and J. Martel-Pelletier, Mod. Rheumatol., 2004, 14, 197–204 CrossRef.
  33. K. Hashizume, J. Reprod. Dev., 2007, 53, 1–11 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  34. M. A. Weaver, Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 2006, 23, 97–105 CrossRef PubMed.
  35. T. Weihua, Inhibition study of Matrix Metalloproteinase by inhibitor in Herb Korean Monkshood Root and metal ions inhibitor, MPhil, Northwest University, Xi'An, 2009.
  36. T. J. Smeets, M. C. Kraan, S. Galjaard, P. P. Youssef, M. D. Smith and P. P. Tak, Ann. Rheum. Dis., 2001, 60, 561–565 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. Y. S. Kim and T. H. Joh, Biomol. Ther., 2012, 20, 133–143 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. Y. Itoh, IUBMB Life, 2006, 58, 589–596 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  39. V. Pelmenschikov and P. E. M. Siegbahn, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 5659–5666 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  40. E. Decaneto, S. Suladze, C. Rosin, M. Havenith, W. Lubitz and R. Winter, Biophys. J., 2015, 109, 2371–2381 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. F. X. Gomis-Rüth, J. Biol. Chem., 2009, 23, 15353–15357 CrossRef PubMed.
  42. S. Deslandes, C. Galaup, R. Poole, B. Mestre-Voegtlé, S. Soldevila, N. Leygue, H. Bazin, L. Lamarque and C. Picard, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10(42), 8509–8523 CAS.
  43. S. Linse, B. Jönsson and W. J. Chazin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1995, 92(11), 4748–4752 CrossRef CAS.
  44. L. G. Rodriguez, X. Wu and J. L. Guan, Methods Mol. Biol., 2005, 294, 23–29 Search PubMed.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018