Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Boosted visible light photodegradation activity of boron doped rGO/g-C3N4 nanocomposites: the role of C–O–C bonds

Shaobo Li abc, Tao Zhu ac, Lichun Dong *ac and Mingdong Dong *b
aSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China. E-mail: lcdong72@cqu.edu.cn
bInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus-C 8000, Denmark. E-mail: dong@inano.au.dk
cKey Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies & Systems of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 40004, China

Received 1st November 2018 , Accepted 1st November 2018

First published on 9th November 2018


Abstract

Correction for ‘Boosted visible light photodegradation activity of boron doped rGO/g-C3N4 nanocomposites: the role of C–O–C bonds’ by Shaobo Li et al., New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 17644–17651.


The authors would like to correct an error in the text of the published article. The sentence on Page 17648, Left Column, Lines 48–53 should read:

As shown in Fig. 4c, the B-5%rGO/g-C3N4 nanocomposite exhibits the lowest interfacial charge-transfer resistance among the as-synthesized nanomaterials, suggesting a high separation efficiency of charge carriers in B-rGO/g-C3N4 owing to the enhanced C–O–C covalent bonding between g-C3N4 and rGO.

The authors would like to correct Fig. 4, as the UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra shown in Fig. 4a are incorrect in the published article. The correct Fig. 4 is shown below.


image file: c8nj90110d-f4.tif
Fig. 4 UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra and plots of the transformed Kubelka–Munk function versus the energy of light (inset) (a), photoluminescence (PL) spectra (b), EIS (c) and transient photocurrent responses (d) of the as-synthesized samples (g-C3N4 (I), B-g-C3N4 (II), 5%rGO/g-C3N4 (III) and B-5%rGO/g-C3N4 (IV)).

The authors would also like to correct Fig. 5, as Fig. 5d is incorrect in the published article. The correct Fig. 5 is shown below.


image file: c8nj90110d-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Photocatalytic activities (a) and the corresponding kinetic study (b) of RhB degradation under visible light (λ > 420 nm) irradiation over the as-synthesized catalysts; RhB degradation efficiency after 150 min over the fresh catalysts and the catalysts after being reused 4 times (c); (pure g-C3N4 (I), B-g-C3N4 (II), 5%rGO/g-C3N4 (III) and B-5%rGO/g-C3N4 (IV)) (d) photocatalytic activity of the B-5%rGO/g-C3N4 composite for RhB, MO and phenol degradation.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2018