Fan
Fei
a,
Taotao
Lu
a,
Xue-Tai
Chen
*a and
Zi-Ling
Xue
b
aState Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China. E-mail: xtchen@nju.edu.cn
bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
First published on 1st May 2018
Correction for ‘Synthesis and structural characterization of metal complexes with macrocyclic tetracarbene ligands’ by Fan Fei et al., New J. Chem., 2017, 41, 13442–13453.
The emission spectra in acetonitrile solution (1.0 μM) show a band at 402 nm (λex = 340 nm) for 1 and two bands at 405 nm and 532 nm for 4 (λex = 345 nm) (Fig. 5), corresponding to the blue-violet and yellow-green emissions, respectively. Compared to 1 and 4, the emission spectrum of 5 shows two weak bands at 389 nm and 520 nm (λex = 340 nm) (Fig. 5). The emission quantum yield (Φ) of 4 was determined to be 0.28 (λex = 345 nm) relative to quinine sulfate,24,25 while that of 5 was very low, below 0.05 (λex = 340 nm).
In addition, the caption of Fig. 5 should read:
Fig. 5 (upper) Absorption spectra of (H4L1)(PF6)4 (black), 1 (red), 4 (green) and 5 (blue). (bottom) Emission spectra of 1 (red, λex = 340 nm), 4 (green, λex = 345 nm) and 5 (blue, λex = 340 nm). All the samples were 1 μM in acetonitrile.
In the ESI, page 12, the excitation wavelength used to measure the emission quantum yield of 4 should be 345 nm. The ESI was corrected on 25th April 2018.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2018 |