Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Reassessment of long circulation via monitoring of integral polymeric nanoparticles justifies a more accurate understanding

Haisheng He a, Sifan Jiang b, Yunchang Xie a, Yi Lu a, Jianping Qi a, Xiaochun Dong a, Weili Zhao ac, Zongning Yin b and Wei Wu *a
aKey Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery of MOE and PLA, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China. E-mail: wuwei@shmu.edu.cn
bWest China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
cKey Laboratory for Special Functional Materials of the Ministry of Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China

Received 12th June 2018 , Accepted 12th June 2018

First published on 18th June 2018


Abstract

Correction for ‘Reassessment of long circulation via monitoring of integral polymeric nanoparticles justifies a more accurate understanding’ by Haisheng He et al., Nanoscale Horiz., 2018, DOI: 10.1039/c8nh00010g.


The authors have noticed an error in Fig. 7 in the original article. In the previously published figure, Fig. 7A and D are identical, due to an error when creating the figure. The new Fig. 7 provided below replaces the originally published figure and contains the correct images. This error does not affect the experimental data, results analysis and conclusions of the work.
image file: c8nh90013b-f7.tif
Fig. 1 Pharmacokinetic profiles (n = 3) of PTX-loaded mPEG-PCL nanoparticles by monitoring intact nanoparticles (A) or PTX (D); enlargement of the pharmacokinetic profiles within 0–8 h: (B) for A, (E) for D; AUC values for pharmacokinetic profiles of integral nanoparticles (C) and PTX (F). PTX/mPEG5k-29%-200 nm vs. PTX/PCL-200 nm: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; PTX/mPEG5k-29%-80 nm vs. PTX/PCL-200 nm: #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018