Vito Michele
Paradiso
*a,
Maria
Castellino
a,
Massimiliano
Renna
b,
Concetta Eliana
Gattullo
a,
Maria
Calasso
a,
Roberto
Terzano
a,
Ignazio
Allegretta
a,
Beniamino
Leoni
b,
Francesco
Caponio
a and
Pietro
Santamaria
b
aDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Amendola 165/a, 70126, Bari, Italy. E-mail: vito.paradiso@uniba.it; Tel: +39 (0)80 544 2272
bDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Amendola 165/a, 70126, Bari, Italy
First published on 9th October 2018
Besides the variety of colours and flavours, microgreens show interesting nutritional properties, mainly regarding their contents of mineral nutrients and bioactive compounds. To date, the literature has prevalently focused on the individual nutritional features of microgreens usually belonging to Brassicaceae. The present study reports an articulated nutritional profile of six genotypes of microgreens, belonging to three species and two families: chicory (Cichorium intybus L., Puglia's local variety ‘Molfetta’, CM, and cultivar ‘Italico a costa rossa’, CR) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. Group crispa, cultivar ‘Bionda da taglio’, LB, and ‘Trocadero’, LT), from Asteraceae; and broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. Group italica Plenk, Puglia's local variety ‘Mugnuli’, BM, and cultivar ‘Natalino’, BN) from Brassicaceae. All the microgreens, except LB, can be considered good sources of Ca, whilst LT and CM also showed considerable amounts of K. As regards bioactive compounds, Brassica microgreens were the richest in phenolic antioxidants. The microgreens also presented higher amounts of α-tocopherol and carotenoids compared to mature vegetables. In particular, broccoli microgreens and LB showed the highest amounts of vitamin E, while Asteraceae microgreens presented the highest levels of carotenoids. Due to their delicate tissues, fresh cut microgreens showed a shelf life not exceeding ten days at 5 °C. The results obtained highlight the possibility to exploit genetic biodiversity in order to obtain tailored microgreens with the desired nutritional profiles, with particular regard to mineral nutrients and bioactive compounds. Appropriate pre- and post-harvest strategies should be developed, so as to allow microgreens to retain as long as possible their nutritional value.
Besides the organoleptic aspects, the nutritional properties of microgreens are also relevant, due to their high contents of micronutrients and bioactive compounds.5,7–9 As regards minerals, lettuce microgreens showed higher contents of some elements (Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, Se and Mo) compared to mature vegetables,9 and such levels were unaffected by changes in soil properties and composition. Brassicaceae microgreens were also reported as good sources of K, Ca, Fe and Zn.10 No further data are available, to the best of our knowledge, on the mineral content of other microgreens.
Vitamins and their precursors are another nutrient class lending nutritional value to microgreens. Relevant amounts of α-tocopherol (vitamin E), β-carotene (pro-vitamin A), ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and phylloquinone (vitamin K1) were reported in recent investigations, though high variability was observed when different species and cultivars were compared.5,11–13 Other phytochemicals reported in microgreens are phenolic antioxidants, anthocyanins, glucosinolates and carotenoids.7,12–15
Due to their favourable contents in micronutrients and bioactive compounds, microgreens have been proposed as “super foods”,6,16 and have been suggested for very demanding consumers, such as raw foodists, vegetarians and vegans.4 They are also indicated for growing in urban and peri-urban settings, and have been proposed even as a component of space life support systems.2,17
Surprisingly, very scarce information is available in the literature regarding the proximate composition of microgreens.4,18
As fresh-cut products, microgreens are characterized by a relatively short shelf-life, not exceeding 10–14 days.2 Being composed of young tissues, fresh-cut microgreens are highly respiring products, whose decline is related to a stress induced response more than to natural senescence.2 Both pre-harvest and post-harvest treatments, as well as different packaging materials and modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), have been considered as variables affecting the shelf-life of fresh-cut microgreens.13,14,19–22 Calcium application in preharvest improved the overall and microbial quality of broccoli microgreens during storage at 5 °C.14,20,21 Different sanitizers were also compared for post-harvest treatments, with varying results. Kou et al.23 improved the microbial quality of buckwheat microgreens by washing with chlorine; an analogous effect was observed by Xiao et al.22 for radish microgreens. Calcium lactate in the chlorinated dipping solution provided further improvement of the shelf-life of broccoli microgreens, though the longest shelf-life was obtained with calcium preharvest treatments without dipping.21 Chandra et al.19 obtained the best microbial quality on Tah Tasai Chinese cabbage microgreens combining washing in citric acid solution with ethanol spray. The film oxygen transmission rate affected the equilibrium concentrations of CO2 and O2, but did not generate major effects on the shelf life of the product.22,23 Nevertheless, storage temperature is the most influencing factor on the product shelf-life.2,22
The present study was aimed to evaluate the nutritional potential of six microgreens, belonging to three species (Cichorium intybus L., Brassica oleracea L. Group italica Plenk, and Lactuca sativa L. Group crispa), including two Italian local varieties, by integrating different compositional aspects and providing a nutritional profile. Three out of the six microgreens were also packed as fresh cut produce and subjected to shelf-life evaluation at refrigerated temperature.
chla (mg L−1) = 11.24 A661.6 − 2.04 A644.8 |
chlb (mg L−1) = 20.13 A644.8 − 4.19 A661.6 |
Antiradical activity was evaluated by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) stable radical scavenging capacity test, according to Difonzo et al.27 The freeze dried samples (0.1 g) were extracted with 5 mL methanol:water (80:20) for 2 hours in tubes covered with aluminum foil. The extracts were then centrifuged for 15 minutes at 15000g and 24 °C. The supernatant was recovered and filtered with PTFE septa (0.45 μm). The extracts (50 μL) were added to 950 μL of 0.08 mM DPPH in methanol. The mixture was shaken and kept at room temperature in the dark for 30 min. The decrease of the absorbance at 517 nm was measured using a Cary 60 Agilent spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Milan, Italy). The results were expressed in μmol Trolox equivalents (TE) per 100 g fresh weight. Two samples were analysed per genotype. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. Total phenolic compounds (TPC) were determined on the same methanolic extract by the Folin–Ciocalteu assay.28 In particular, 100 μL of the extract were mixed with 100 μL of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and, after 4 min, with 800 μL of a 5% (w/v) solution of sodium carbonate. The mixture was then heated in a water bath at 40 °C for 20 min and the total phenol content was determined at 750 nm by using an Agilent Cary 60 spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). The total phenolic content was expressed as gallic acid equivalents (μg g−1).
Total anthocyanins (TA) were extracted by adding 12.5 mL of 70:29.5:0.5 (v/v) methanol/water/HCl (37%) to 100 mg of the lyophilized sample, and then keeping on an orbital shaker at 500 rpm, for 2 h, in the dark. The samples were then centrifuged at 12000g for 5 min and the supernatant was recovered. The absorbance of the solution was determined at 535 nm by using a Cary 60 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A calibration curve was previously set up by using solutions of the standard cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (Phytoplan, Heidelberg, Germany). TA were determined on duplicate samples.
Alpha-tocopherol extraction was performed according to Santos et al.29 The lyophilized sample (0.250 g) was extracted twice with ethyl acetate containing 0.1% BHT (6 + 6 mL) by agitation for 15 min and sonication for further 15 min. Finally, the samples were centrifuged (14000g, 15 min) and the supernatants combined and filtered through a 0.45 μm nylon filter. The extract was taken to dryness under nitrogen and resuspended in 2 mL of isopropanol. HPLC–FLD analysis was performed using a UHPLC binary system (Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLC, Waltham, MA, USA).30 Isocratic separation was carried out on a C18 column (Acclaim 120 C18, 150 mm × 4.6 mm, 3 μm, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) with acetonitrile and methanol (1:1 v/v) as the mobile phase at a constant flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The injection volume was 20 mL. The detection was performed with a fluorescence detector (exc = 295 nm, em = 325 nm). The quantification of α-tocopherol was performed using the external calibration method. Alpha-tocopherol determination was carried out on triplicate samples.
Total carotenoids were determined using Lichtenthaler's formula.26 Freeze-dried samples (0.005 g) were weighed in test tubes, wrapped with aluminium foil, hydrated with 100 μL of purified water and extracted in the dark with 8 mL ethanol. The test tubes were incubated at room temperature overnight. Then the samples were vortexed and centrifuged. The absorbance (A) of the extract was measured at 470.0 nm, 648.6 nm and 664.2 nm. Total carotenoids (TC) on a dry weight (DW) basis were determined using the following formula:
Total chlorophylls were determined as described above.
For the microbiological analysis, replicate samples were pooled to obtain the amounts needed for the analyses. 25 g of the microgreen samples were placed in a sterile stomacher bag with a polyethylene filter layer containing 225 mL of buffered peptone water (0.1% sterile peptone, w/v) (BPW, Oxoid, CM1049). The samples were homogenized using a Stomacher 400 lab blender (Seward Medical, London, UK) set at 230 rpm for 2 min and diluted with peptone water for microbial counting. Microbiological analysis was carried out by plating serially diluted samples using different agar media. Total aerobic mesophilic and psychotropic bacteria were enumerated on plate count agar (PCA) and the plates were incubated at 30 °C for 24–48 h and 6 °C for 5–7 days, respectively. Presumptive mesophilic lactobacilli and cocci, Enterobacteriaceae, yeasts and molds were estimated as described previously.31 Staphylococci were counted on Baird Parker agar plus egg yolk tellurite (Oxoid), at 37 °C for 48 h. GSP agar (Fluka, St Louis, MO, USA) plus penicillin-G (60 g L−1) was used for Pseudomonas spp. The same pre-enrichment broth was used to detect Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli, as previously described by Cosmai et al.32 Another 25 g were diluted in 225 ml of listeria enrichment broth base and used for the determination of Listeria monocytogenes as reported by Cosmai et al.32 The media for plating of bacteria were supplemented with cycloheximide at 0.17 g L−1. Except for GSP agar, all media were purchased from Oxoid Ltd (Hampshire, UK). Each microbial count was determined as the mean of three measurement results and was expressed as log CFU per g. The microbiological counts were preliminarily confirmed by taking representative colonies for each medium which were analyzed for morphology, motility, Gram staining reaction and catalase test.
Sensory analysis was performed by a trained panel of five judges, experienced with microgreens and fresh cut vegetables. The evaluation of visual quality was performed on a 5-point scale according to Berba and Uchanski33 (Table 1).
Score | Description | Visual quality |
---|---|---|
a Berba and Uchanski, 2012.33 | ||
5 | Essentially free from defects, freshly harvested. No profound visible defects | Excellent |
4 | Minor defects, not objectionable. Some (<10%) physical damage (i.e. creased cotyledons). Product is turgid (not wilted) | Good |
3 | Moderately objectionable defects, marketability threshold. Slight chlorosis (yellowing). Areas of dry and wilted microgreens (<25%) | Fair |
2 | Excessive defects, not saleable – discolored hypocotyls (blue, black). Cotyledon chlorosis (>25%). Dry and wilted (>50%) | Poor |
1 | Unusable, degraded product. 100% chlorotic. Mold present, foul odor. Extensive rooting. Physical degradation apparent (liquid present) | Very poor |
Olfactive quality, as the appearance of off-odors, was evaluated on a 5-point scale according to Kou et al. (1 = no off-odor and 5 = extremely strong off-odor).20
The proximate composition of the microgreens is reported in Table 2. The dry matter content showed no significant differences among the microgreens (6.0 g per 100 g as an average). Xiao et al.5,10 found slightly higher values (6.9 and 6.6 g per 100 g) for the average dry matter content of 25 and 30 commercial microgreens, respectively, though in some cases, values above 10 g per 100 g were observed. Samuolienė et al.37 obtained Brassica microgreens with 5.6 g per 100 g dry matter, while basil, Swiss chard and rocket microgreens studied by Bulgari et al.36 showed values in the range of 4.0–5.5 g per 100 g.
CM | CR | BM | BN | LB | LT | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||||||
a Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters in the same row indicate a significant difference according to Tukey's test (P < 0.05). LOD, limit of detection. Genotypes: Cichorium intybus L. (Puglia's local variety ‘Molfetta’, CM, and cultivar ‘Italico a costa rossa’, CR); Lactuca sativa L. Group crispa (cultivar ‘Bionda da taglio’, LB, and ‘Trocadero’, LT); Brassica oleracea L. Group italica Plenk (Puglia's local variety ‘Mugnuli’, BM, and cultivar ‘Natalino’, BN). | ||||||||||||||||||
Dry matter | 6.4 | 0.7 | a | 6.3 | 0.7 | a | 6.8 | 0.6 | a | 6.0 | 0.9 | a | 5.2 | 0.8 | a | 5.5 | 0.6 | a |
Lipids | 0.3 | 0.0 | ab | 0.3 | 0.0 | b | 0.4 | 0.1 | a | 0.3 | 0.0 | b | 0.3 | 0.0 | b | 0.3 | 0.1 | ab |
Proteins | 1.9 | 0.0 | c | 2.4 | 0.0 | b | 3.0 | 0.1 | a | 2.8 | 0.1 | a | 2.6 | 0.1 | b | 2.4 | 0.0 | b |
Fibre | 0.62 | 0.07 | ab | 0.70 | 0.06 | a | 0.36 | 0.03 | c | 0.26 | 0.00 | c | 0.43 | 0.06 | c | 0.44 | 0.08 | bc |
Glucose | 0.11 | 0.01 | bc | 0.26 | 0.01 | a | 0.17 | 0.05 | b | 0.04 | 0.00 | c | 0.03 | 0.00 | c | 0.17 | 0.00 | b |
Fructose | 0.14 | 0.07 | ab | 0.22 | 0.01 | a | 0.03 | 0.01 | bc | <LOD | c | 0.05 | 0.01 | bc | 0.12 | 0.02 | abc | |
Sucrose | 0.19 | 0.07 | bc | 0.32 | 0.01 | ab | 0.38 | 0.01 | a | 0.14 | 0.04 | c | 0.12 | 0.04 | c | 0.26 | 0.05 | abc |
Ashes | 0.9 | 0.1 | b | 1.1 | 0.2 | ab | 1.2 | 0.1 | a | 1.1 | 0.2 | a | 1.0 | 0.1 | ab | 1.0 | 0.1 | ab |
As expected, the lipid content of the microgreens was negligible and comparable to the typical values of traditional leafy vegetables.38 Proteins were higher in Brassicaceae than in Asteraceae microgreens. However, their content was not noticeable, reaching a maximum amount of 3.0 g per 100 g. The microgreens also showed low levels of dietary fibre: the chicory genotypes showed the highest levels, not exceeding 0.70 g per 100 g. Sugars reached the maximum amount (0.80 g per 100 g) in CR and the minimum level in BN (0.19 g per 100 g). The relatively high fructose content in Asteraceae (particularly chicory) is ascribable to the relevant fructose metabolism shown by these plants. The overall energy value of the microgreens ranged from 70 kJ per 100 g (LB) to 100 kJ per 100 g (BM).
Element | CM | CR | BM | BN | LB | LT | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||||||
a Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters in the same row indicate a significant difference according to Tukey's test (P < 0.05). b ICP-AES detection limit. Genotypes: Cichorium intybus L. (Puglia's local variety ‘Molfetta’, CM, and cultivar ‘Italico a costa rossa’, CR); Lactuca sativa L. Group crispa (cultivar ‘Bionda da taglio’, LB, and ‘Trocadero’, LT); Brassica oleracea L. Group italica Plenk (Puglia's local variety ‘Mugnuli’, BM, and cultivar ‘Natalino’, BN). | |||||||||||||||||||
P | μg g−1 | 944 | 45 | ab | 1039 | 44 | a | 568 | 17 | d | 793 | 17 | c | 536 | 29 | d | 872 | 53 | bc |
K | μg g−1 | 3736 | 261 | b | 4496 | 142 | a | 2495 | 103 | c | 2921 | 53 | c | 2865 | 126 | c | 4735 | 372 | a |
Ca | μg g−1 | 1272 | 84 | c | 1546 | 31 | bc | 1878 | 129 | a | 2027 | 23 | a | 1008 | 50 | d | 1466 | 6 | bc |
Mg | μg g−1 | 252 | 26 | a | 237 | 17 | ab | 207 | 2 | b | 220 | 5 | ab | 200 | 16 | b | 248 | 8 | a |
S | μg g−1 | 588 | 71 | d | 708 | 27 | c | 1387 | 19 | b | 1575 | 18 | a | 248 | 11 | e | 670 | 3 | cd |
Na | μg g−1 | 105 | 30 | c | 80 | 10 | c | 227 | 5 | b | 256 | 46 | b | 474 | 15 | a | 73 | 9 | c |
Fe | μg g−1 | 14.1 | 2.8 | ab | 12.1 | 0.4 | bc | 6.5 | 0.3 | c | 5.9 | 0.2 | c | 4.3 | 0.2 | c | 16.6 | 0.5 | a |
Zn | μg g−1 | 4.4 | 0.3 | b | 4.5 | 0.1 | bc | 3.0 | 0.1 | c | 4.6 | 0.1 | b | 4.7 | 0.1 | b | 5.2 | 0.1 | a |
Mn | μg g−1 | 7.5 | 1.0 | b | 6.8 | 0.9 | c | 5.3 | 0.9 | c | 8.0 | 0.1 | b | 13.2 | 0.6 | a | 6.6 | 0.1 | bc |
Cu | μg g−1 | 0.83 | 0.05 | b | 1.18 | 0.01 | a | 0.29 | 0.01 | d | 0.39 | 0.01 | c | 0.45 | 0.02 | c | 0.86 | 0.06 | b |
Ni | μg g−1 | 0.26 | 0.01 | a | 0.29 | 0.02 | a | 0.09 | 0.02 | c | 0.09 | 0.01 | c | 0.10 | 0.01 | c | 0.15 | 0.03 | b |
Cd | ng g−1 | 44 | 3 | b | 35 | 3 | bc | 19 | 1 | c | 29 | 2 | bc | 61 | 4 | a | 74 | 2 | a |
Pb | ng g−1 | <14b | <14 | <14 | <14 | <14 | <14 |
The two chicory varieties and LT showed the highest content of P, K, Fe, Cu and Ni; the concentrations of P, K and Fe were similar to those measured by Pinto et al.9 in lettuce microgreens. In contrast, LB had the lowest content of mineral elements, except for Na and Mn, which were the highest in these species and comparable to those reported by Pinto et al.9 Both Brassica varieties were noteworthy not only for the highest S concentration, but also for the highest Ca concentration. Their composition reflected that reported by Xiao et al.10 for 30 different Brassicaceae varieties of microgreens, except for the Ca content which exceeded two to five times the literature values. Between the two Brassicaceae genotypes, BN appeared to be the richest in mineral nutrients.
The mineral nutrient profile (P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, Fe and Zn) of the microgreens was compared with the values of the corresponding mature plant, as reported in the National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference of USDA.38 Both LB and LT were characterized by contents of P, Ca, Mg and Zn considerably higher than those reported for mature lettuce butterhead (330 mg kg−1 P, 350 mg kg−1 Ca, 130 mg kg−1 Mg, and 2 mg kg−1 Zn). Moreover, Bionda lettuce presented a Na concentration about tenfold higher than that reported for mature lettuce, but a lower Fe content (reference value for Fe: 12.4 mg kg−1). Chicory microgreens showed a higher content of P and a lower content of Na compared to mature green chicory (USDA reference value for P and Na: 450 mg kg−1).38 The mineral composition of BM and BN was similar to that of reference mature broccoli, except for Ca which was more abundant in microgreen tissues (reference value: 470 mg kg−1 Ca). In general, the microgreens produced under the present experimental conditions resulted in an interesting vegetable source of Ca, K and Mn. According to European Regulations,41,42 the microgreens can be considered as sources of the following minerals (i.e. supplying in 100 g at least 15% of the nutrient reference value): K (CM and LT) and Ca (all except LB). Moreover, the relatively high levels of Mn in all the studied microgreens allow them to be considered as sources of Mn (BM) or high Mn foods (being able to provide from 34% to 66% of the nutritional reference value). It is noteworthy that Mn can create both problems of dietary deficiency, especially in developing countries, and toxicity, mainly due to environmental pollution and excessive levels in drinking water.43,44 The possibility to modulate the mineral contents of microgreens, on the basis of either genetic diversity or agronomic parameters, is being explored, with the aim to provide appropriate supplementation or to reduce dietary exposure to single mineral nutrients. Significant results have been obtained for K, leading to the production of low-K microgreens which could be suitable for patients with impaired kidney function.18 Similarly, further research on other mineral elements could aim at producing tailored microgreens with the desired mineral contents.
The antioxidant pattern of the microgreens included hydrophilic phenols, tocopherols and carotenoids. The antiradical activity of methanolic extracts presented the highest levels in the microgreens from Brassicaceae, while the lowest activity was observed in chicory microgreens (Fig. 2B). An analogous outstanding behaviour of Brassicaceae was observed for the total phenolic content (Fig. 2C): 791 μg GAE per g and 655 μg GAE per g were determined in BN and BM respectively, while the microgreens from Asteraceae presented halved content of phenolic compounds, ranging from 252 μg GAE per g in CR to 359 μg GAE per g in CM. Compared to the literature data, the hydrophilic antioxidant activity observed in BN and BM microgreens was quite high. Xiao et al.13 reported mean values of about 90 μmol TE per g and 27 mg gallic acid per g in radish microgreens, but on a dry weight basis. The reported data, expressed on a fresh weight basis, are prevalently included in the range of 0.3–0.6 mg gallic acid per g in several microgreen species (amaranth, basil, kale, broccoli, mustard, tatsoi, orach, borage, beet, parsley, pea, red pak choi, kohlrabi, Swiss chard and rocket).36,37,52,53 In some cases higher phenolic contents were reported, even exceeding 1 mg gallic acid per g FW, for the same microgreen species (basil, beet, pack choi, mustard, tatsoi and parsley).15,53,54 It is interesting to observe that such high phenolic contents were recorded in experiments dealing with artificial lighting systems, pointing out the importance of lighting conditions for the accumulation of photoprotective phenolics since the early stages of plant development.55,56 Among the phenolic antioxidants, anthocyanins resulted a significant fraction only in broccoli (BN) microgreens (Fig. 2D). The literature data on anthocyanin contents are quite variable, often reporting several hundreds of μg per g FW,15,37 though in coloured microgreens (e.g. red pak choi, mustard and kohlrabi). Nevertheless, much lower values (8.83–14.41 μg per g FW) were observed by Bulgari et al.36 in basil, Swiss chard and rocket microgreens. These data were comparable with the other microgreens evaluated in the present study.
Regarding lipophilic antioxidants, α-tocopherol was detected in a wide range of concentrations, from 11 to 76 μg per g FW (Fig. 2E). BM microgreens were the richest in this important bioactive compound. Fewer data are available on the α-tocopherol content in microgreens. Samuolienė et al.12,53 reported values ranging from 0.5 (in beet) to 852 (in parsley) μg per g FW. Xiao et al.5 reported very high values in commercial microgreens, in the range of 4.9–87.4 g per 100 g FW in 25 different species. Nevertheless, in a subsequent paper considering six microgreen species, they observed lower values, comparable to those of the present research.57 Total carotenoids ranged from less than 80 to almost 160 μg per g FW (Fig. 2F). The microgreens belonging to the Asteraceae family, particularly chicory microgreens, showed the highest contents. These levels were comparable to those reported by other authors,12,36,53,57 including commercial microgreens,5 though tenfold higher amounts were reported in a recent paper by Brazaitytė et al.54 The observed levels of lipophilic compounds were compared to those of the corresponding mature vegetables.38 The microgreens showed higher contents of α-tocopherol compared to mature vegetables. As examples, α-tocopherol contents in chicory greens, raw spinach, broccoli and lettuce are, respectively, 22.6, 20.3, 7.8 and 2.2 μg g−1. As regards carotenoids, the USDA database (considering the sum of β-carotene, lutein/zeaxanthin and cryptoxanthin) reports the following contents: 122, 103, 62 and 27 μg g−1 for raw spinach, chicory greens, lettuce and broccoli respectively. The considered microgreens presented, therefore, increased the contents of carotenoids compared to mature green vegetables.
The data available in the literature on respiration rates are mainly regarding fresh cut Brassicaceae microgreens (broccoli, radish and Tah Tasai Chinese cabbage).13,19,20,22 The literature confirms high respiration rates of Brassicaceae microgreens, though variations in some packaging parameters (such as total packaging surface) should not be disregarded when comparing the data. As regards headspace gas composition for packed microgreens other than Brassicaceae, only the data regarding buckwheat (Poaceae family) are available23 and they report that oxygen reached the equilibrium concentration at about 17 kPa after four days, with the exception of the bags with the lowest OTR, where O2 pressure decreased for 21 days to a final level of 12 kPa.
This points out the need for further information about cultivar/species-related postharvest physiology and, consequently, packaging and shelf-life optimization of fresh-cut microgreens, as previously stated by Kyriacou et al.2
Chlorophyll degradation occurs during storage due to senescence processes induced by ethylene58 and is related to the visual quality of microgreens.33 As expected, all the microgreens underwent chlorophyll degradation (Fig. 4C). In chicory microgreens, however, chlorophylls decreased by about 10% in the initial phases of storage, remaining unchanged in the final days. LB and BN microgreens, instead, showed a progressive degradation during the entire storage time, with an overall decrease by 20–30%. Similar trends were reported for radish microgreens stored at 5 °C in polyethylene.22
Table 4 shows the microbial population of broccoli, lettuce and chicory microgreens after 1, 3, 7 and 10 days of storage. The number of total aerobic mesophilic bacteria in LB leaves during the initial phase of storage was ca. 4.13 ± 0.08 log CFU per g, counts lower than those found in the other two types of microgreens. The starting numbers were relatively high, due to the delicate tissues of microgreen stalks that may be more vulnerable to microbes than mature tissues.19,22 The data were comparable to or lower than those found for Tah Tasai Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris var. narinosa),19 daikon radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. longipinnatus),22 and buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench CV. Manner) microgreens.23 Instead, the observed final levels observed were comparable to or higher than those reported in the previously cited studies. This may be explained by the differences in the texture of different microgreens and by a “rebound” effect caused in our study by the washing with chlorinated solutions, which is known to cause an immediate decrease of microbial population compared to non-washed products but results in higher microbial numbers during storage. This effect has been attributed to the excess moisture remaining after washing and drying.22,23 Psychrotrophic microorganism counts were very similar to those of mesophilic microorganisms (data not shown). The results obtained for BN, LB and CR on microbial cell density agree with those found in the literature for different kinds of vegetables. The highest cell density of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) was detected in BN and this microbial population decreased by 1 log cycle in ten days. LAB have been reported in a wide variety of vegetables with cell density ranging from 2 to 8 log CFU per g.59 Streptococci were in the range of 4.86–6.71 log CFU per g at day 1 and storage led to gradual increases of about 1–2 log cycles for all types of microgreens after ten days. Refrigeration brought about a rise in Enterobacteriaceae counts of 2 log CFU per g in BN and LB, after 10 days of storage. Enterobacteriaceae are considered as a hygiene indicator. However, their presence does not indicate the presence of pathogenic microorganisms.60 Biochemical and serological tests on Salmonella spp. excluded the presence of the pathogen, in agreement with the requirements of the EC Regulation No 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. E. coli cell density was below the limit indicated in the abovementioned EC Regulation (100 CFU per g) (data not shown). None of the isolates was identified as E. coli O157:H7. Previous studies by Xiao et al.61 indicated that E. coli strains could significantly proliferate during microgreen growth, reaching different levels depending on the initial inoculation level of the seeds. Oh et al.62 evaluated the microbiological quality of Brassica campestris var. narinosa microgreen and reported that the contamination level of coliforms was 3.2 log CFU per g, while Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and pathogenic E. coli were not detected. The viable numbers of Pseudomonas spp. present in broccoli leaves were ca. 6.3 log CFU per g and decreased by 2 log CFU per g until the end of storage. Both Pseudomonas and LAB are normal microbiota of vegetables, whereas coliforms, yeasts and molds may arise from the raw material or from contamination during processing.63Listeria spp. were found only in chicory, with cell density in the range of 2.14–3.23 log CFU per g. Biochemical and serological tests on L. monocytogenes allow exclusion of the presence of this species. Molds and yeasts reached 8.5–5.5 and 8.6–7.5 log CFU per g in BN and LB, respectively, at the end of storage. Tournas64 found similar results with fresh and minimally-processed vegetables, and sprouts. The lowest cell densities for molds and yeasts were found in CR samples, and remained unchanged in ten days of storage. Badosa et al.65 reported yeast and mold counts in most of the vegetable samples, ranging from 4 to 7 log CFU per g.
Storage time (days) | Samples | Mesophilic aerobes | Lactic acid bacteria | Streptococci | Enterobacteriaceae | Listeria spp. | Staphylococci | Pseudomonas spp. | Yeasts | Moulds | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference according to Tukey's test (P < 0.05); nd, not found in 10 g of leaves. Genotypes: Cichorium intybus L. (cultivar ‘Italico a costa rossa’, CR); Lactuca sativa L. Group crispa (cultivar ‘Bionda da taglio’, LB); Brassica oleracea L. Group italica Plenk (cultivar ‘Natalino’, BN). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | CR | 6.69 | 0.076 | d | 1.84 | 0.014 | cd | 6.59 | 0.020 | bc | 4.65 | 0.040 | b | 2.63 | 0.042 | ab | 6.45 | 0.125 | a | 3.67 | 0.019 | c | 5.95 | 0.003 | d | 2.12 | 0.014 | d |
BN | 6.51 | 0.113 | d | 4.32 | 0.086 | ab | 6.71 | 0.132 | bc | 3.18 | 0.066 | c | nd | nd | 6.32 | 0.124 | a | 5.78 | 0.116 | d | 6.52 | 0.131 | b | |||||
LB | 4.13 | 0.008 | e | 2.11 | 0.051 | c | 4.86 | 0.041 | d | 3.45 | 0.002 | c | nd | 4.23 | 0.070 | c | 4.77 | 0.011 | bc | 3.28 | 0.007 | f | 1.11 | 0.022 | e | |||
3 | CR | 7.74 | 0.043 | c | 1.66 | 0.030 | cd | 6.71 | 0.089 | bc | 4.64 | 0.071 | b | 3.23 | 0.269 | a | 5.22 | 0.002 | 3.22 | 0.109 | c | 6.05 | 0.052 | cd | 2.26 | 0.049 | d | |
BN | 6.41 | 0.128 | d | 4.83 | 0.096 | a | 6.43 | 0.126 | bc | 3.78 | 0.075 | bc | nd | nd | 5.95 | 0.119 | ab | 6.42 | 0.124 | c | 6.18 | 0.126 | bc | |||||
LB | 4.52 | 0.018 | e | 2.05 | 0.032 | c | 4.94 | 0.011 | d | 3.82 | 0.014 | bc | nd | 4.53 | 0.090 | c | 5.36 | 0.003 | b | 4.93 | 0.009 | e | 1.33 | 0.002 | e | |||
7 | CR | 8.16 | 0.124 | b | nd | 8.40 | 0.043 | a | 4.88 | 0.035 | b | 2.07 | 0.084 | b | 3.98 | 0.030 | c | 3.07 | 0.077 | c | 3.69 | 0.036 | f | 2.47 | 0.275 | d | ||
BN | 8.05 | 0.161 | b | 4.98 | 0.091 | a | 7.33 | 0.146 | b | 5.68 | 0.116 | a | nd | nd | 5.08 | 0.106 | b | 6.57 | 0.134 | c | 7.95 | 0.159 | a | |||||
LB | 6.15 | 0.111 | d | 1.48 | 0.023 | d | 6.08 | 0.150 | c | 4.00 | 0.101 | bc | nd | 5.66 | 0.020 | b | 6.23 | 0.102 | a | 5.86 | 0.102 | d | 2.36 | 0.005 | d | |||
10 | CR | 8.19 | 0.132 | b | nd | 8.45 | 0.002 | a | 4.93 | 0.041 | b | 2.14 | 0.147 | b | 4.09 | 0.015 | c | 3.18 | 0.151 | c | 3.58 | 0.022 | f | 2.58 | 0.133 | d | ||
BN | 9.42 | 0.188 | a | 3.72 | 0.074 | b | 7.98 | 0.156 | ab | 5.87 | 0.011 | a | nd | nd | 4.70 | 0.094 | bc | 8.57 | 0.014 | a | 8.48 | 0.166 | a | |||||
LB | 7.92 | 0.151 | bc | 1.33 | 0.021 | d | 6.68 | 0.121 | bc | 5.43 | 0.102 | a | nd | 6.59 | 0.130 | a | 5.75 | 0.110 | ab | 7.49 | 0.115 | b | 5.54 | 0.101 | c |
Sensory evaluation gave results related to the different metabolic activities observed in the packed microgreens (Table 5). Broccoli microgreens were the first to undergo sensory deterioration due to the higher respiratory activity and mould number compared to other microgreens. Visual quality showed some defects after three days, though remaining acceptable. The other microgreens were unchanged at that time. After one week, the olfactive properties of LB were still optimal, while all other sensory scores pointed out the presence of visual and olfactive defects. However, sensory quality was still satisfactory. After ten days of storage, the three microgreens differed substantially. BN received the lowest score for both visual and olfactive quality. CR was in better conditions, though being below the marketability threshold. LB microgreens, instead, showed only moderately objectionable defects and were still above the marketability threshold.
Storage time (days) | CR | BN | LB | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visual | Olfactive | Visual | Olfactive | Visual | Olfactive | |
Genotypes: Cichorium intybus L. (cultivar ‘Italico a costa rossa’, CR); Lactuca sativa L. Group crispa (cultivar ‘Bionda da taglio’, LB); Brassica oleracea L. Group italica Plenk (cultivar ‘Natalino’, BN). | ||||||
0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
7 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
A sensory shelf-life extension of fresh-cut broccoli microgreens up to 21 days was obtained by other authors using preharvest treatments with calcium salts.14,20,21 Kou et al. also showed that post-harvest treated microgreens presented shorter shelf-lives, from the sensory point of view, compared to pre-harvest ones, and that broccoli microgreens washed with chlorine hardly remained acceptable up to 11 days.21 Chandra et al.19 reported that off-odors in fresh-cut Tah Tasai cabbage microgreens, treated with chlorine, remained tolerable for seven days. The authors obtained an extension to nine days with sanitizers other than chlorine. Xiao et al.13 reported that the sensory acceptability of fresh-cut radish microgreens ranged from less than 8 days to 16 days, depending on the packaging material and exposure to light/darkness. No data are available in the literature on microgreens belonging to families other than Brassicaceae.
Interesting properties were highlighted for the studied genotypes as compared with their mature leaf counterparts, mainly regarding mineral nutrients (Ca and K, above all) and the content of some bioactive compounds (such as carotenoids and α-tocopherol). These results suggest the possibility to delineate genotype-specific nutritional profiles, also to further exploit the quality potential of microgreens. In this regard, biodiversity, combined with appropriate growing techniques, could be a precious resource for developing tailored microgreens, with the desired nutritional features.
On the other hand, the high perishability of fresh cut microgreens shown in this study poses the need for appropriate approaches aimed at preserving as long as possible their post-harvest nutritional and organoleptic value.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018 |