Ali K.
Ismael
ab,
Iain
Grace
a and
Colin J.
Lambert
*a
aDepartment of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. E-mail: c.lambert@lancaster.ac.uk
bDepartment of Physics, College of Education for Pure Science, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq
First published on 15th June 2018
Correction for ‘Connectivity dependence of Fano resonances in single molecules’ by Ali K. Ismael et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 6416–6421.
“Fig. 8. DFT transmission curves. (a) The black curve shows the transmission coefficient for molecule b of Fig. 3. (b) The blue dashed curve shows the transmission coefficient for molecule a of Fig. 3.”
Therefore, the first two paragraphs of Section III should read:
“So far the discussion has focused on tight-binding representations of the molecules shown in Fig. 7.
For molecules (a and b) containing two carbonyl groups, Fig. 8 shows DFT results for the transmission coefficients (see Methods for more details). In common with the tight binding results of Fig. 4, both a and b show alternating destructive interference features. In the case of a, such a feature occurs between the LUMO and LUMO+1, whereas in the case of b, they occur between the HOMO and LUMO and between LUMO+2 and LUMO+3. On the other hand for both molecules, destructive interference features appear near E = −2.4 eV, which are almost independent of connectivity, signaling the presence of a Fano resonance.”
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © the Owner Societies 2018 |