E. L.
Unger
*ab,
L.
Kegelmann
c,
K.
Suchan
a,
D.
Sörell
a,
L.
Korte
c and
S.
Albrecht
d
aChemical Physics and NanoLund, Lund University, Box 124, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden. E-mail: eva.unger@chemphys.lu.se
bHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Young Investigator Group Hybrid Materials Formation and Scaling, Kekuléstraße 5, 12489 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: eva.unger@helmholtz-berlin.de
cHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Institut für Silizium-Photovoltaik, Kekuléstraße 5, 12489 Berlin, Germany
dHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Young Investigator Group Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells, Kekuléstraße 5, 12489 Berlin, Germany
First published on 21st July 2017
Correction for ‘Roadmap and roadblocks for the band gap tunability of metal halide perovskites’ by E. L. Unger et al., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 11401–11409.
This means that the previous statement regarding this data set: “Some of the compounds of the triple-cation (MAyFA1−y)1−zCsz PbI3 alloys (Fig. 2, brown/white square) introduced by Saliba et al. (ref. 3 in the original article) exhibit a similar offset compared to the CsPb(BrxI1−x)3 series suggesting that Cs inclusion on the A-site of the lattice affects the band gap in a comparable manner” was a misinterpretation.
The authors would hereby like to make the following statement:
“The triple-cation alloys (MAyFA1−y)1−zCszPbI3 (Fig. 2, brown/white squares) introduced by Saliba et al. (ref. 3 in the original article) exhibit a similar trend as the data sets of hybrid perovskite materials, suggesting that Cs inclusion on the A-site of the lattice affects the band gap in a comparable manner.”
The authors would like to replace Fig. 2 with the corrected version, shown below.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 |