Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
Correction: Double-emulsion drops with ultra-thin shells for capsule templates
Shin-Hyun
Kim
a,
Jin Woong
Kim
b,
Jun-Cheol
Cho
c and
David A.
Weitz
*a
aSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. E-mail: weitz@seas.harvard.edu; Tel: +1 617 495 3275
bDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Hanyang University, Ansan, South Korea
cAmore-Pacific Co. R&D Center, Yongin, South Korea
First published on 13th January 2017
Abstract
Correction for ‘Double-emulsion drops with ultra-thin shells for capsule templates’ by Shin-Hyun Kim et al., Lab Chip, 2011, 11, 3162–3166.
In the section “Diameter and shell thickness of double-emulsion drops” there are errors in eqn (2) and in the sentence that begins “In the same fashion, we calculate the thickness of the middle layer of double-emulsion drops which are produced at each values of Q1/Q2 and plot the results in Fig. 3c”. The equation should be
The sentence should read “In the same fashion, we calculate the thickness of the middle layer of double-emulsion drops which are produced at each values of Q2/Q1 and plot the results in Fig. 3c”.
In the caption for Fig. 3c, “Relative thickness of shell to radius of the double-emulsion drops (t/R) as a function of Q1/Q2.” should read “Relative thickness of shell to radius of the double-emulsion drops (t/R) as a function of Q2/Q1.” In addition, the x-axis is incorrectly labelled with “Q1/Q2”. The x-axis should be “Q2/Q1”. A corrected version of Fig. 3c is shown.
 | ||
| Fig. 3 (c) Relative thickness of shell to radius of the double-emulsion drops (t/R) as a function of Q2/Q1. | ||
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 |