Correction: Evaluating the role of energetic disorder and thermal activation in exciton transport

Abstract

Correction for ‘Evaluating the role of energetic disorder and thermal activation in exciton transport’ by S. Matthew Menke et al., J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016, 4, 3437–3442.

---

There is a mistake in the distance dependence of eqn (4), which should read:

There are also errors in Table 1 on page 3440, which affect four callouts from the main text. In Table 1, the second column, “R_0,C⁶/τ_rad [nm⁶ ns⁻¹]” is actually “R_0,C/τ_rad^1/6 [nm ns^−1/6]”. This correction only changes the second column title and the seventh column values (“R_0,C”) and the corrected table is given below:

Table 1 Model parameters for the KMC simulations predicting the temperature dependence of L_D. Here, R_0,C/τ_rad^1/6, E_A, and σ are fitting parameters for the KMC simulations. The η_PL is separately measured allowing for the tabulation of τ_rad and extraction of R_0,C from the fit parameters. Shown for comparison is the average molecular separation (d) determined from the thin-film density (ρ) as

Material	R 0,C/τrad^1/6 [nm ns^−1/6]	E A [meV]	σ [meV]	η PL [%]	τ rad [ns]	R 0,C [nm]	d [nm]
Alq3	2.3	<10	150	16.2	99	5.0	0.53
DCV3T	1.7	80	33	8.0	17	2.7	0.54
SubPc	1.4	<10	35	1.0	55	2.7	0.48

---

For consistency, all references to the fitting parameter R_0,C⁶/τ_rad must also be changed to R_0,C/τ_rad^1/6. This occurs on page 3439, column 1, line 13; page 3439, column 2, line 3; page 3439, column 2, line 18; and page 3440 in the caption of Fig. 4, line 6.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.

---

Footnotes

† This author identified the errors in the original paper and checked the consistency of the correction with the rest of the paper as published.

‡ Current address: Department of Physics, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, J.J. Thompson Ave, Cambridge, CB3 0HE, UK.

---