Guo Jiang*,
Jian Feng,
Mengdi Zhang,
Shuidong Zhang* and
Hanxiong Huang
Lab for Micro Molding and Polymer Rheology, The Key Laboratory of Polymer Processing Engineering of the Ministry of Education, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, PR China. E-mail: jiangguo@scut.edu.cn; starch@scut.edu.cn
First published on 4th November 2016
Three types of anhydride (maleic anhydride (MA), phthalic anhydride (PA) and pyromellitic dianhydride (PMDA)) were melt blended to end-cap poly(propylene carbonate) (PPC) by reactive extrusion. The effect of anhydride types on thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of PPC was investigated. Results of FTIR spectra, Raman spectra and GPC indicate that the reaction mechanism between PPC with MA was different from PPC with PA and PMDA. During the extrusion processing in the presence of MA, end capping occurs for the free polymer ends and reduces chain depolymerization in a conventional way. For PA and PMDA, some non-covalent interaction may exist and it is deduced that hydrogen bonding may occur. In addition, TGA results show that the thermal degradation temperature of PPC could be improved by adding three types of anhydride, and the T−5% of PPC–PMDA was the highest and increased by 26.3 °C. The tensile strength and Young's modulus of PPC is also improved with the addition of MA, PA and PMDA. Moreover, the value of elongation at break of all end-capped PPC still can remain higher than 1000%.
It is important to have a fundamental understanding of PPC degradation pathways to improve the thermal properties of PPC. The backbone structure plays a major role in the thermal decomposition of PPC. The thermal decomposition occurs via two mechanisms: main chain random scission and unzipping degradation (shown in Scheme 1). Adding end-capping agent is an effective way, which could react with terminal hydroxyl groups of PPC and then inhibit the unzipping reaction.23–26 It is known that maleic anhydride (MA) acts as a kind of reactive anhydride, which is often used in polymer reactive extrusion system. Yao et al.27 found that when a small amount of MA was melt blended to end-cap PPC, it could improve the thermal stability and mechanical properties of PPC. Barreto et al.28 prepared the blends of PPC modified with MA and pyromellitic dianhydride (PMDA) by melt mixing. They found that the use of PMDA is advantageous over MA considering the improvement of the thermal stability. The result suggested that when the content of PMDA is 1 wt%, the T−5% of PPC is increased by nearly 23 °C. In our earlier work,29 we modified PPC with MA via a reactive extrusion. When MA content was lower than 1 phr, PPC was successfully end-capped with MA, while MA acted as an external lubricant during reactive extrusion more than an end-capped reagent at higher MA content.
Based on the previous work on structure and property of PPC capped with MA, addition of benzene is thought to be useful to increase the property of PPC. Phthalic anhydride (PA) and PMDA are two types of anhydride with benzene and their chemical structures are shown in Fig. 1. PA is an organic compound with the formula C6H4(CO)2O and it is the anhydride of phthalic acid. PMDA is an organic compound with the formula C6H2(C2O3)2 and it is the double carboxylic acid anhydride. So in this work, three types of anhydride (MA, PA and PMDA) were chosen to end-cap PPC by reactive extrusion. Structure of end-capped PPC was characterized by FTIR and Raman spectra. The properties were measured by thermogravimetry analysis and mechanical property testing. Effect of anhydride type on structure, thermal and mechanical properties was analyzed. Finally, the melt reaction mechanism of end-capped PPC in presence of different type end-capping reagents was proposed.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 The structure for maleic anhydride (a), phthalic anhydride (b), and pyromellitic dianhydride (c). |
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 FTIR spectra of raw PPC material and end-capped PPC by different acid anhydrides with content of 1 phr. |
For PPC–PA1 and PPC–PMDA1, the FTIR spectra are similar as that of raw PPC material. The characteristic peak at 3100 cm−1 is not obvious and may be covered in the infrared test. Considering Raman peak based on benzene with a strong fluorescent effect is more obvious, Raman spectra are used to further investigate the reactive mechanism of PPC and PA or PMDA. Owing to similar molecular structure of PA and PMDA, Raman test was conducted on sample of PPC–PMDA1. The Raman spectra of PPC, PPC–PMDA1, and PMDA are shown in Fig. 3. Barreto et al.28 used pyromellitic dianhydride in PPC matrix to improve the stiffness, the thermal stability and decreases the melt viscosity of PPC, which can be explained by mechanisms of conventional end capping, branching due to the tethering of more than two PPC chains to a single anhydride molecule, and the influence of non-covalent interactions. Gao et al.1 reported a one-step strategy for pseudo-interpenetrating PPC networks by direct terpolymerization of CO2, PO and PMDA. In this work, for pure PMDA, there exists a clear characteristic peak at 766.9 cm−1, shown in Fig. 3(c). When Raman spectra of PPC and PPC–PMDA1 are scaled up, a faint characteristic peak at 766.9 cm−1 in PPC–PMDA1 can be observed, shown from Fig. 3(b), which illustrates that there exists an interaction between PPC and PMDA. The characteristic peak is not strong, partly owing to the lower content of PMDA in reactive extrusion of PPC and PMDA. From IR spectrum analysis, probably there is no obvious capping reaction taken place between PMDA and PPC. The interaction between PPC and PMDA or PA may be the non-covalent interaction.
In order to understand structure difference of PPC reacted with different acid anhydrides, the materials were further studied by GPC measurements. The number-average molecular weight (Mn), weight-average molecular weight (Mw) and the molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn) of pure PPC and PPC–MA1, PPC–PA1, PPC–PMDA1 are summarized in Table 1. One can clearly see that the molecular weight of pure PPC increased after the addition of MA, PA and PMDA. In the meantime, the value of Mw/Mn decreases slightly. The weight-average molecular weight of PPC-MA1 increases from 83602 (Mw of pure PPC) to 118
924, which indicates that MA serves as an end-capping agent in the processing of reaction extrusion with PPC. The reaction mechanism is end-capping reaction between PPC and MA, leading to higher molecular weight due to the chain extension. For PPC–PA1 and PPC–PMDA1, the weight-average molecular weight increases to 86
381 and 90
394 and the increase is slight. This is agreed with the results of FTIR and Raman spectra, chain extension between PPC and PA or PMDA is not the main reaction mechanism.
Samples | Mn | Mw | Mw/Mn |
---|---|---|---|
Pure PPC | 33![]() |
83![]() |
2.472 |
PPC–MA1 | 49![]() |
118![]() |
2.393 |
PPC–PA1 | 35![]() |
86![]() |
2.434 |
PPC–PMDA1 | 37![]() |
90![]() |
2.415 |
Shown from results of FTIR spectra, Raman spectra and GPC, it replies that the reactive mechanism of MA and PA or PMDA probably is different. Based on the structural characterization, the reactive mechanism between PPC and anhydrides is proposed, shown in Scheme 2. With any type of acid anhydride, random chain scission occurs and new hydroxyl end groups are generated, owing to the thermal degradation during extrusion at temperature higher than melt temperature. Then the molecular weight and viscosity may be decreased for the random chain scission. During the extrusion processing in the presence of MA, end capping takes place for the free polymer ends and reduces chain depolymerization in the conventional way. Chain extension for PPC and MA system in the extrusion reaction occurs. For PA and PMDA, they have aromatic rings and some non-covalent interaction may be existed when they are reactive extruded and hydrogen bonding may be formed.
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 Tensile strength, elongation at break and Young's modulus for pure PPC, PPC–MA1, PPC–PA1 and PPC–PMDA1. |
Fig. 5 shows TGA curves of pure PPC and PPC–MA1, PPC–PA1, PPC–PMDA1 and the 5%, 50%, 95% weight loss temperatures (T−5%, T−50%, T−95%) are listed in Table 2. As it can be seen, the TGA parameters show the expected increase in the thermal stability for PPC after the addition of MA, PA, and PMDA. Shown from Table 2, the T−5% of PPC–PMDA1 was the highest and increased by 26.3 °C, compared with that of pure PPC. For PPC–MA1 composites, mechanism of thermal stability improving is that MA brings an end-capping reaction with hydroxyl group of PPC and prevents the chain unzipping degradation. For PPC–PA1 and PPC–PMDA1 composites, the hydroxyl ends of PPC could react with the carboxyl of PA and PMDA to form hydrogen bonding and at the same time, the reaction activity of hydroxyl groups of PPC also could be inhibited. In addition, PMDA serves as an aromatic dicarboxylic anhydride. PMDA not only contains a benzene ring but also has more carboxyl groups. Then the thermal stability of PPC–PMDA1 can be improved more effectively.
Samples | T−5%/°C | T−50%/°C | T−95%/°C |
---|---|---|---|
Pure PPC | 210.5 | 295.6 | 350.5 |
PPC–MA1 | 236.1 | 293.8 | 353.6 |
PPC–PMDA1 | 236.8 | 305.0 | 356.9 |
PPC–PA1 | 231.1 | 294.8 | 352.7 |
The enhancement of mechanical properties with temperature can be further demonstrated by the measurement of dynamic mechanical properties. Fig. 6(a) shows the dynamic storage modulus (E′) of pure PPC, PPC–MA1, PPC–PA1 and PPC–PMDA1 over a temperature range of 0–80 °C. At the range of lower temperature, all samples were in the glassy region and E′ values decreased slowly with the temperature up to 15 °C. With the increase of temperature, PPC–MA1 exhibits best mechanical property, owing to its higher molecular weight. Moreover, it is shown from Fig. 6(a) that the storage modulus of PPC is enhanced by the addition of PA, PMDA at all the testing temperature range. It indicates that the stiffness of PPC is improved by the addition of PA, PMDA. This result agrees well with the above mechanical property results.
![]() | ||
Fig. 6 Dynamic mechanical properties of PPC, PPC–MA1, PPC–PA1, and PPC–PMDA1. (a) storage modulus (b) tan![]() |
Fig. 6(b) presents the tanδ of pure PPC, PPC–MA1, PPC–PA1 and PPC–PMDA1 versus temperature. The plots of tan
δ versus temperature show prominent peaks that correspond to the glass transition of polymer and the maximum value for each peak is used to define the glass transition temperature (Tg). It can be noted that the Tg of PPC is increased with the addition of MA, PA, PMDA. Furthermore, the Tg of PPC–MA1 is higher than that of PPC–PA1 and PPC–PMDA1. This result might due to the fact that the Mw of PPC–MA1 is much higher and MWD is smaller than PPC–PA1 and PPC–PMDA1. Therefore, the molecular chain mobility of PPC–MA1 is much lower than PPC–PA1 and PPC–PMDA1.
The viscosity of PPC and end-capped PPC was measured using a rotational rheometer. This kind of dynamic rheology testing is thought to be a preferential rheological method for investigating the structure of materials. The complex viscosity, storage modulus, and loss modulus can be recorded. To our knowledge, the rheological behavior of end-capped PPC has not been well-studied. In this work, the dynamic complex viscosity η* versus oscillatory frequency curves of pure PPC, PPC–MA1, PPC–PA1 and PPC–PMDA1 were plotted using dynamic frequency sweep test (f = 0.01–100 s−1) at 150, 160, 170, and 180 °C, shown in Fig. 7. For all samples, the complex viscosity is decreased with the increase of temperature and the materials exhibit shear thinning phenomena. At all of the testing temperature, end-capped PPC have a good processing property. In order to know effect of anhydride type on molecular weight, the compared complex viscosity versus frequency curves at 160 °C is shown in Fig. 8. As it can be seen from Fig. 8, the complex viscosity of PPC–PA1 and PPC–PDMA1 is a little larger than PPC–MA1. This is related with benzene group of PA and PMDA and the existent of benzene group may inhibit the flow of polymer melts.
![]() | ||
Fig. 7 Complex viscosity versus frequency curves for pure PPC (a), PPC–MA1 (b), PPC–PA1 (c) and PPC–PMDA1 (d) at different temperatures. |
Activation energy of viscous flow can be calculated through linear regression of lnη* versus 1/T curves at different frequency, shown in Fig. 9. The slope of curves can be obtained and then the activation energy of viscous flow can be calculated using the Arrhenius equation. The calculated results are listed in Table 3. For all of the samples, the activation energy of viscous flow at high frequencies was smaller than that at lower frequencies. This illustrates that higher shearing rate during extrusion, i.e. higher screw rotating speed, will decrease the molecular weight of PPC. Pure PPC has the highest activation energy of viscous flow and the activation energy of PPC–PMDA1 is larger than that of PPC–MA1 and PPC–PA1 at the same frequency. The reason behind this might be that all anhydrides may act as acid catalyzer, leading to the hydrolysis of the ester group in PPC. Thus the short chain branches content increased, which enhanced the free movement of the end-capping PPC main chain. Compared with the molecular structure of MA, PA has one more benzene ring. This steal hindrance of PA is higher than that of MA. Further, the molecular structure of PMDA has one more anhydride bond than that of PA and theoretically PMDA have more reactivity points than PA. It is suggested that the anhydrides participate in a ‘healing’ reaction that remedies the molecular weight drop for the hydrides with aromatic rings. PA or PMDA can also act as a physical cross-link point, owing to the ‘healing’ reaction.
![]() | ||
Fig. 9 ln(complex viscosity) versus 1/T curves for pure PPC (a), PPC–MA1 (b), PPC–PA1 (c) and PPC–PMDA1 (d) at different frequencies. |
Samples | Activation energy (kJ mol−1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.1 s−1 | 1 s−1 | 10 s−1 | 39.81 s−1 | 100 s−1 | |
Pure PPC | 108.47 | 100.84 | 75.63 | 61.07 | 57.51 |
PPC–MA1 | 91.07 | 85.19 | 60.97 | 46.21 | 41.84 |
PPC–PMDA1 | 98.58 | 90.61 | 65.22 | 50.30 | 45.97 |
PPC–PA1 | 95.56 | 90.23 | 66.15 | 49.94 | 46.89 |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |