Incorporation of CO2 philic moieties into a TiO2 nanomembrane for preferential CO2 separation

R. Selyanchyn, A. Staykov and S. Fujikawa*
WPI International Institute for Carbon-Neutral Energy Research (WPI-I2CNER), Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan. E-mail: fujikawa.shigenori.137@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp; Tel: +81 092 802 6872

Received 19th July 2016 , Accepted 10th September 2016

First published on 12th September 2016


Abstract

Here we report a preferential CO2 separation membrane consisting of a nanometer-thick TiO2 layer incorporated with phtalic acid (PA) molecules on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) (PA@TiO2/PDMS). Incorporated PAs in TiO2 act as CO2-philic pores for preferential CO-2 permeation over nitrogen. CO2 binding to the PA incorporated in TiO2 is confirmed by the density functional theory calculation (DFT). As a result, membranes with of PA@TiO2 layer demonstrated much higher selectivity to CO2 for mixed CO2/N2 gas separation compared to a conventional PDMS membrane. The exceptional selectivity of the composite layer alone (>150) was estimated by a resistance model.


Intensive emission of CO2 into the atmosphere due to combustion of fossil fuels causes global warming.1 To prevent the emission of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, carbon capture and storage should be introduced in mass emission sites such as coal-fired power plants.

While CO2 separation by membranes is a promising method to reduce capture costs,2,3 it has not been widely used, because it still requires higher gas flux, durability and selectivity. Organic polymer membranes have been mostly investigated, however despite the good results achieved in the separation of CO2, polymers are lacking long-term usability and chemical stability for industrial use.4 In contrast, inorganic membranes, for instance made of zeolites, have better chemical and physical stability, at the same time have less flexibility in molecular design of membrane materials and membrane fragility limits further developments. Composites of organic and inorganic materials would have potentials to integrate useful characteristics of both components in membrane material. For example, Lau et al. reported that the addition of inorganic fillers into the organic polymer matrix enabled not only to prevent aging in super glassy polymers but in some cases increase the selectivity of the materials5 to overcome limits set by Robeson upper bound.6,7 One of the approaches in designing gas separation membrane is to control the CO2 affinity of membrane materials. Recent computational works has revealed such molecular interactions between CO2 and sorption material. Torrisi et al. showed that the use of polar functional groups in benzene ring has a major impact in improving in the CO2-ligand affinity and the best –H substituents are found to be –NH2, –SO3H, and –COOH.8,9 Similar finding was reported by Dasgupta et al.10 who have assessed the influence of specific functional groups on the adsorption selectivity of CO2/N2 mixtures with model system consisting of a bilayer graphene nanoribbon that has been edge functionalized with –OH, –NH2, –NO2, –CH3 or –COOH. Their studies also revealed that functionalization always leads to an increase in the adsorption of both CO2 and N2. However, enhancement in selectivity was detected only for –COOH edge functionalized graphene nanoribbons so the authors concluded that specific functionalization with –COOH groups can provide material's design strategy to improve CO2 selectivity in microporous adsorbents. These results inspire that inorganic membranes possessing abundance of carboxylic groups would have potential to develop CO2 separation membrane.

In our research, we design materials based on titanium dioxide composited with aromatic carboxylic acids resulting in the abundance of free –COOH groups in the membrane matrix. Phthalic acid (PA) was employed as a source of –COOH moieties incorporated into the metal oxide. It has been reported that aromatic carboxylate derivatives can be easily incorporated into a titanium matrix via the molecule complexation with titanium alkoxides.11

In detail, a glass substrate was coated with a layer of poly (styrenesulfonic acid) sodium salt (PSS) with the thickness of ca. 1 μm by spin-coating. Then polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) support film with the thickness of ca. 2 μm was prepared on the substrate by spin-coating of 20% PDMS solution in hexane. In order to make the PDMS surface hydrophilic for the formation of uniform TiO2 layer on it, PDMS film was treated by O2 plasma. Separately, PA (10 mM) and titanium n-butoxide (100 mM) were dissolved in n-butanol and stirred for 12 hours at room temperature for their complexation. This mixture solution was then spin-coated on the plasma-treated PDMS (p-PDMS) with the rotation speed of 3000 rpm for 1 min to form the composite layer of PA@TiO2 (PA@TiO2/p-PDMS). As a reference sample, a TiO2 layer without PA (TiO2/p-PDMS) was also prepared by the same procedure with the use of same concentration titania precursor solution. The formation of the TiO2 layer by spin coating of its corresponding precursor solution is a well-known phenomenon. Due to the relatively quick hydrolysis of TiO2 precursors (in our case Ti(O-nBu)4) a film is readily formed under ambient temperature and humidity.11 Subsequently the substrate was immersed in water to detach the films from the substrate by dissolving the PSS layer. Detached membrane floating on water surface was transferred onto a porous support for gas permeation experiments.

Fig. 1(a and b) shows the optical image of the p-PDMS, TiO2/p-PDMS (both used as references) and PA@TiO2/p-PDMS membranes surfaces respectively. Fig. 1d shows the typical cross-section SEM image of the inorganic (or composite) film deposited to the p-PDMS surface confirming the formation of TiO2 layer with about 100 nm thickness. After the deposition of TiO2 and PA@TiO2 layers on p-PDMS, cracks appear on the surface as shown in Fig. 1(b and c). Before detaching the film from a glass substrate, no cracks were observed. During the detachment, a membrane undergoes flexible movements while floating on water and thus, this is the step when cracks are introduced, since a ceramic film is not so elastic like organic polymer membranes. Defects in the gas separation membrane are a considerable drawback, since defects result in simple gas leak. Despite cracks in the composite layer, PA@TiO2/p-PDMS membrane showed preferential CO2 permeation over nitrogen as shown in Fig. 2. Namely, the pristine p-PDMS membrane showed CO2 permeance higher than other membranes and CO2 selectivity over N2 (α(CO2/N2) ≃ 4.3). Deposition of pure TiO2 on a p-PDMS membrane resulted in suppressing the both gases permeance and gave the similar gas selectivity (α(CO2/N2) ≃ 3.6). However, with PA incorporation into TiO2 layer much higher decrease was observed in nitrogen permeation, resulting in the enhancement of CO2 selectivity (α(CO2/N2) ≃ 16.1). This selectivity enhancement compared to the pristine p-PDMS is a clear indication that PA@TiO2 contributed significantly to the selectivity enhancement, despite the number of cracks observed on the membrane surface.


image file: c6ra18419g-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Optical microscopy images of the surface of (a) PDMS, (b) TiO2/p-PDMS and (c) PA@TIO2/p-PDMS membranes; (d) cross-section SEM image of the membrane top demonstrating the attachment of the composite TiO2 layer to the surface of the p-PDMS support.

image file: c6ra18419g-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Permeance of CO2 and N2 through the composite PA@TiO2/p-PDMS membrane compared to plasma treated PMDS (p-PDMS) and TiO2/p-PDMS membranes. O2 plasma treatment time (a) 30 s, (b) 5 s (feed gas – 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 mixed N2 and CO2).

In the process of the membrane fabrication, oxygen plasma treatment is needed to prepare a well-attached and uniform a TiO2 layer on a PDMS. But this surface oxidation results in the reduction of both gas permeance and selectivity. Earlier works suggested that this is caused by the formation of the thin SiO2 layer on the PDMS due to treatment.12 In order to minimize the effect of a SiO2 layer, the plasma time was reduced to only 5 s. The gas permeance obtained from the membranes with shorter plasma treatment is higher than that of the membranes with longer plasma treatment (Fig. 2b). Long term performance of the optimized PA@TiO2/p-PDMS (5 s plasma treatment) for the CO2/N2 (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) dry mixture gas separation is shown in Fig. 3. It is seen that the membrane performance is stable over 25 hours (the observed selectivity α(CO2/N2) of PA@TiO2/p-PDMS is higher than 30). Although further improvements of a TiO2/p-PDMS membrane morphology is necessary, we believe that evaluating the potential of this composite membrane is worthy to prove our design concept. In order to evaluate the selectivity and permeability of the PA@TiO2 layer alone, the resistance model was employed.13,14


image file: c6ra18419g-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) Long time performance of the PA@TiO2/PDMS membrane for the mixed CO2 and N2 separation and (b) permeability–selectivity relation for PDMS, composite membrane PA@TiO2/PDMS and selective layer PA@TiO2 (calculated by resistance model).

According to the resistance model, total permeance PAB of the simple double layer defect-free membrane schematically depicted below can be calculated using eqn (1).13

 
image file: c6ra18419g-u1.tif(1)
where PA and PB are the gas permeances of the layer A (a composite TiO2 in our case) and B (PDMS in our case) respectively, shown as the schematic illustration in the eqn (1). In order to account the influence of the defects in the composite layer as schematically shown below, the eqn (2) combined with eqn (1) should be used.13,14
 
image file: c6ra18419g-u2.tif(2)
where PM is the experimentally measured permeance of composite membrane, aA and aB are the surface area of TiO2 coated PDMS (represented as a Layer A) and PDMS support layer (represented as a Layer B), respectively. The intact area of the TiO2 layer (aA) was estimated to be about 96–98% by analysing the SEM images of the membrane surface with the image analysis software. The calculated selectivity vs. permeability for PA@TiO2, PA@TiO2/p-PDMS and ideal PDMS alone17 are plotted in Fig. 3b. These are lying close to the Robeson upper bound.7 Noteworthy, PA@TiO2 layer shows exceptionally high selectivity (α > 150). This results implies that CO2 affinity of PA is integrated in a composite membrane.

In order to explain the observed selectivity of PA@TiO2/p-PDMS membrane, gas affinities of PA derivatives to CO2 were calculated by using DFT method. The results of the geometry optimization and binding energies calculation of CO2 to phthalic acid, phthalic acid methyl ester and phthalic acid dimethyl ester are summarized in Fig. 4. As a result of the esterification, i.e., a model that represents the binding of the phthalic acid to the TiO2 framework, the binding energy of CO2 gradually decreases from −5.674 kcal mol−1 for the free acid, to −3.765 kcal mol−1 for the methyl ester, and finally to −2.510 kcal mol−1 for the dimethyl ester. The binding energy of N2 to phthalic acid and its esters is calculated to be always negligible.


image file: c6ra18419g-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Binding energies of CO2 to the phthalic acid in various model states (free, partially bound, and completely bound) obtained using DFT calculations.

The high binding energy of CO2 to PA compared to that of nitrogen, is caused mainly by hydrogen bonding interaction between CO2 and carboxyl group of PA similarly to that reported by Torrisi et al. for benzoic acid9 and Dasgupta et al. for –COOH functionalized graphene.10 In our case, even monovalent coordination of PA to TiO2 decreases the binding energy, it is still high enough compared to nitrogen. However, full loss of free carboxylic acid group likely decrease binding energy leading to losing the gas separation selectivity.

Considering these results, possible separation mechanism can be discussed. In the case of only TiO2 coating, unreacted butoxide groups remains in a TiO2 matrix, since condensation reaction between titanium precursors may not be proceeded sufficiently under current mild condition. These unreacted moieties may act as micropores for gas permeation. However, the number of micropores may not be sufficient to maintain the gas permeance of a pristine PDMS membrane, resulting in the decrease of the permeance of CO2 and N2 equally. Incorporation of PA molecules into a TiO2 matrix enhances the CO2 affinity and therefore TiO2 matrix would uptake CO2 preferentially over N2. As a result, the space of micropores in TiO2 would become smaller due to limited physical space for simple gas diffusion without any chemical interaction. Thus, N2 permeation is suppressed and the gas selectivity of CO2 over N2 becomes high. This description has not been fully confirmed experimentally and further investigation of gas permeation such as comparison of mixed gas vs. pure, solubility and diffusion tests, feed pressure influence etc. are currently under way, and the comprehensive discussion will be reported elsewhere.

In conclusion, we successfully incorporated the CO2 philic molecules into the TiO2 membrane. As a result, the enhancement of selectivity to CO2 for the N2/CO2 mixed gas separation was observed. Application of resistance model for membrane parameters calculation revealed that the PA@TiO2 layer has unprecedented selectivity (>150) towards the CO2/N2-separation. DFT calculations demonstrated that the preferential binding of CO2 to free carboxylic groups of the phthalic acid plays an important role to enhance gas selectivity. Our current approach is very simple and versatile. The material design used in this work was only predicted by computation in earlier works.8–10 To the best of our knowledge our work is a first experimental demonstration of attributed selectivity in titania membrane due to incorporation of small molecules with CO2 affinity. We believe that this approach can be further sophisticated to fabricate better gas separation membranes. Improved gas separation performance may be possible by selection of molecules with higher CO2 affinity and incorporating them into a nanometer-thick membranes.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan. Also work was financially supported by the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS Grant-in-aid for Research Activity Start-up, No. 26889045).

Notes and references

  1. D. F. Sanders, Z. P. Smith, R. Guo, L. M. Robeson, J. E. McGrath, D. R. Paul and B. D. Freeman, Polymer, 2013, 54, 4729–4761 CrossRef CAS.
  2. J. Hansen, M. Sato, R. Ruedy, K. Lo, D. W. Lea and M. Medina-Elizade, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2006, 103, 14288–14293 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. Basic research needs for carbon capture: beyond 2020, US Department of Energy Basic Energy Sciences Workshop for Carbon Capture, 2010.
  4. M. Pera-Titus, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 1413–1492 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. C. H. Lau, P. T. Nguyen, M. R. Hill, A. W. Thornton, K. Konstas, C. M. Doherty, R. J. Mulder, L. Bourgeois, A. C. Y. Liu, D. J. Sprouster, J. P. Sullivan, T. J. Bastow, A. J. Hill, D. L. Gin and R. D. Noble, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5322–5326 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. L. M. Robeson, J. Membr. Sci., 1991, 62, 165–185 CrossRef CAS.
  7. L. M. Robeson, J. Membr. Sci., 2008, 320, 390–400 CrossRef CAS.
  8. A. Torrisi, C. Mellot-Draznieks and R. G. Bell, J. Chem. Phys., 2009, 130, 194703 CrossRef PubMed.
  9. A. Torrisi, C. Mellot-Draznieks and R. G. Bell, J. Chem. Phys., 2010, 132, 044705 CrossRef PubMed.
  10. T. Dasgupta, S. N. Punnathanam and K. G. Ayappa, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2015, 121, 279–291 CrossRef CAS.
  11. S. W. Lee, S. Korposh, R. Selyanchyn and T. Kunitake, in Handbook of Molecular Imprinting: Advanced Sensor Applications, Pan Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd, 2012, pp. 3–62 Search PubMed.
  12. D. A. Markov, E. M. Lillie, S. P. Garbett and L. J. McCawley, Biomed. Microdevices, 2014, 16, 91–96 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. J. M. S. Henis and M. K. Tripodi, J. Membr. Sci., 1981, 8, 233–246 CrossRef CAS.
  14. M. Ai, S. Shishatskiy, J. Wind, X. Zhang, C. T. Nottbohm, N. Mellech, A. Winter, H. Vieker, J. Qiu, K.-J. Dietz, A. Gölzhäuser and A. Beyer, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26, 3421–3426 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. TURBOMOLE V6.2 2010, a development of University of Karlsruhe and Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, TURBOMOLE GmbH, since 2007, 1989–2007, available from http://www.turbomole.com Search PubMed.
  16. S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich and H. Krieg, J. Chem. Phys., 2010, 132, 154104 CrossRef PubMed.
  17. W. L. Robb, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1968, 146, 119–137 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

The cross-section and surface morphologies of the membranes were observed by FE-SEM. The membrane samples were obtained by breaking the membranes in liquid nitrogen and coating them with thin layer of platinum before measurement. Optical images were obtained using Keyence VHX-500 digital microscope. In order to estimate the area of PDMS exposed due to the cracks formations in the composite layer, image analysis software (Image-Pro Plus v.4.5) was used to analyse the surface SEM images.

For the gas permeance measurements – membrane area was masked with Kapton and alumina tapes to provide the circle of desired diameter and area (d = 1 cm, a = 0.785 cm2). Additionally, to prevent bending upon vacuuming membrane was placed on the porous polycarbonate support filter (1.2 μm pore size). The dry 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 mixed N2/CO2 permeation through the membranes at 25 °C was measured using the GTR-11A/31A gas barrier testing system (GTR Tec Corp., Japan). The part of the machine where test gas is sampled (GTR-31AKU) uses differential-pressure method for film permeability testing i.e. gas permeation is induced by the vacuum on the permeate side and extra pressure applied at the feed side. Total pressure difference was set to 200 kPa. The gas volume was measured by gas chromatograph with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) (Yanaco G3700T, Japan). Gas permeance and permeability were calculated and represented in GPU and barrer units, where GPU = 7.5 × 10−12 m3(STP) m−2 s−1 Pa−1 and barrer = 7.5 × 10−18 m3(STP)·mm−2 s−1 Pa−1. Selectivity α(CO2/N2) was calculated as ratio of the CO2 and N2 permeances through the membrane.

Density functional theory calculations were performed using the TURBOMOLE program15 and B3LYP level of theory with TZPP basis set and DFT-D3 dispersion energy correction16 in order to estimate the binding energy of phthalic acid and its esters to CO2 and N2 molecules.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.