nBu4NPF6 promoted regioselective cascade synthesis of functionally embellished naphthofurans under acid, metal & solvent free conditions

Abhishek Pareek, Ravikrishna Dada, Monika Rana, Anuj K. Sharma and Srinivasarao Yaragorla*
Department of Chemistry, Central University of Rajasthan, NH-8, Bandersindri, Ajmer-district, Rajasthan 305817, India. E-mail: srinivasarao@curaj.ac.in; ysriict@gmail.com

Received 7th July 2016 , Accepted 12th September 2016

First published on 13th September 2016


Abstract

nBu4NPF6 mediated highly regioselective synthesis of functionally embellished naphthofurans has been achieved from easily available naphthols and propargyl alcohols through a cascade benzylation, oxacyclisation (5-exo dig) and isomerization under solvent free conditions. The reaction works in a short time through dibenzyl ether formation followed by the decomposition to the carbocation to furnish the high yielding products with large substrate scope. The synthetic utility of the products is demonstrated through C(sp3)–H functionalization. In addition, we investigated selected naphthofurans for their anti-amyloidogenic properties. Preliminary studies suggest that these are excellent inhibitors for amyloid formation, a hallmark for several neurodegenerative diseases.


Naphthofurans and benzofurans belong to the important class of oxygen containing heterocyclic compounds that possess a spectrum of biological and pharmacological properties.1–3 They are an integral part of several natural & synthetic molecules (for example furomollugin, viniferifuran, anigopreissin A & 7-methoxy-2-nitronaphtho[2,1-b]furan (R7000) etc.) and serve as building blocks in organic synthesis.2 The naphthofuran moiety is proven to be a “privileged structure”4 in the design of potential anticancer agents1a and regulators of the nuclear receptors HNFa7.5 Owing to these important features several synthetic approaches have emerged for the synthesis of naphthofurans.1h,6–10 Most of the methods were involved in two to three step syntheses starting from suitable propargyl alcohols and naphthols such as a metal/acid catalyzed benzylation followed by the base mediated oxacyclization and isomerization (Fig. 1, eqn (1) & (2)).1h,6 It is also reported that arenols react with Morita–Baylis–Hillman (MBH) acetates in presence of a base and toluene as the reaction medium to form naphthofurans (Fig. 1, eqn (3) & (4)) though the method goes through a single step, the use of MBH acetates makes this method less amenable.7 In(OTf)3 catalyzed coupling of naphthols with nitroalkenes in DCE has also been reported.8 Organometallic cross coupling reactions also used to synthesize the benzo/naphthofuran derivatives.9 A base promoted naphthofuran synthesis was reported in chloroform starting from naphthols and nitroallylic acetates.10 Although there are a number of methods reported for the synthesis of 2,3-disubstituted benzofurans, only a limited number of methods are available for the synthesis of 2,3-disubstituted naphthofurans. Some of them suffer from the drawbacks such as multistep procedures, inert conditions, longer reaction times, poor substrate scope, use of chlorinated solvents, transition metal catalysts, acid catalysts and the use of starting materials which are not easily available. Hence it is highly desired to develop a regioselective, metal, acid and solvent free, one-pot (single step) synthesis of functionally embellished naphthofurans starting from easily available materials under simple reaction procedures.
image file: c6ra17411f-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Previous reports on the synthesis of 2-alkyl, 3-aryl naphthofurans.

Naphthofuran derivatives are well known as imaging agents for β-amyloid plaques in the brain.5 Amyloid formation is related to several devastating diseases including the most common neurodegenerative disease, Alzheimer's disease (AD).12 AD is characterized by deposits of amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) in the brain and the disease still lacks a specific treatment.13 In fact, there is a great demand for compounds that can interact with early stage oligomers or amyloid plaques and/or either inhibit their formation or cause their dissolution into monomeric peptide.14 Only a few of the polyphenolic compounds, benzothiazole based small molecules are known to inhibit the amyloid formation.15 Interestingly, our preliminary analysis suggest that these naphthofuran derivatives exhibit excellent anti-amyloidogenic properties as they very efficiently inhibit fibrilization of lysozyme from chicken egg white, a readily available protein that undergo fibrilization. The detailed investigation is still in progress and the results will be published elsewhere.

On the other side the alarming calls of the global warming emphasize “the role of chemistry in investigating a sustainable future.”16 In response to the global demand to develop the green synthetic protocols,17 we are working towards the development of novel green synthetic procedures for various biologically relevant molecules18 (privileged structures) including our recent work towards the synthesis of fused benzofurans using an alkaline earth catalyst.1f In continuation, here in we report a Bu4NPF6 catalysed, highly regioselective, acid, metal & solvent free synthesis of 2-alkyl-3-aryl-naphthofurans using a cascade benzylation/oxacyclisation/isomerization strategy.

The schematic representation of our concept for the regioselectivity has been described in the Fig. 2. The benzyl intermediate (I) will have two possible pathways of cyclization, either a nucleophilic (phenolic oxygen) addition at β-carbon through a 5-exo dig fashion to furnish the naphthofuran, or the nucleophilic addition at α-carbon through a 6-endo dig fashion to furnish the naphthopyran. We believe that the R group will play a critical role to differentiate α & β carbons and thus the regioselectivity could be achieved.


image file: c6ra17411f-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Conceptualization for the regioselective synthesis of 2-alkyl, 3-aryl naphthofurans.

Our investigations began by treating the stoichiometric amount of 2-naphthol (1a) and 4-hydroxy-4-phenylbut-2-ynoate (2a) with 10 mol% of Ca(OTf)2/Bu4NPF6 under solvent free conditions at 120 °C (entry 1, Table 1).19 As expected the reaction gave the desired ethyl 2-(3-phenylnaphtho[1,2-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3a) in 70% after 4.5 h. When the same reaction was repeated with 10 mol% of Ca(OTf)2 & 5 mol% of Bu4NPF6 only 62% of 3a was isolated. This indicated that Bu4NPF6 has an important role in increasing the yield of 3a. Further to confirm this, we performed the reaction in the absence of Bu4NPF6 (entry 3, Table 1) and were surprised to note that only 24% of 3a was formed after 5 h. The absence of catalyst/additive could not proceed even after 10 h at 120 °C under neat conditions (entry 15). Considering the importance of Bu4NPF6 we carried out the reaction with 10 mol% of Bu4NPF6 (without Ca(OTf)2) and were delighted to see the formation of 3a in 72% after 7 h (entry 4, Table 1). Increase in the catalyst (Bu4NPF6) loading from 10–15 and 15–20 mol% has showed the remarkable effect on the reaction time and yield (entries 4–6). The reaction gave 90% of 3a with in 2.5 h with 20 mol% of Bu4NPF6 at 120 °C (entry 6).20

Table 1 Optimization of reaction condition for the one-pot cascade synthesis of 2-alkyl-3-aryl naphthofurana

image file: c6ra17411f-u1.tif

Entry Catalyst (mol%) Temperatureb (°C) Solvent Yieldc (%) Time (h)
a 1a (1.1 eq.), 2a (1 eq.).b Oil bath temperature.c Isolated yields.d Combined yield for the mixture of furan/pyran.
1 Ca(OTf)2/Bu4NPF6 (10/10) 120 °C Neat 70 4.5 h
2 Ca(OTf)2/Bu4NPF6 (10/5) 120 °C Neat 62 4.5 h
3 Ca(OTf)2 (10) 120 °C Neat 24 5 h
4 Bu4NPF6 (10) 120 °C Neat 72 7 h
5 Bu4NPF6 (15) 120 °C Neat 81 4 h
6 Bu4NPF6 (20) 120 °C Neat 90 2.5 h
7 Bu4NPF6 (20) rt Neat Trace 24 h
8 Bu4NPF6 (20) 60 °C Neat 15 24 h
9 Bu4NPF6 (20) 80 °C Neat 21 24 h
10 Bu4NPF6 (20) 100 °C Neat 71 12 h
11 Bu4NPF6 (20) 90 °C EtOH <5 10 h
12 Bu4NPF6 (20) 50 °C DCM 56 10 h
13 Bu4NPF6 (20) 70 °C MeOH Trace 10 h
14 Bu4NPF6 (20) 90 °C Benzene 12 10 h
15 120 °C Neat nr 10 h
16 NH4Cl (20%) 120 °C Neat <5 8 h
17 Bu4NF (20%) 120 °C Neat 15 8 h
18 KPF6 (20%) 120 °C Neat Trace 8 h
19 Proline 10% 120 °C Neat 8 8 h
20 PTSA 10% 120 °C Neat 45d 8 h
21 NbCl5 10% 120 °C Neat 60 8 h


To check the temperature effect we performed the same reaction at various temperatures such as rt, 60 °C, 80 °C, 100 °C & 120 °C and found that 120 °C is the optimum temperature (Table 1, entries 6–10). The role of solvents in this reaction has been studied using ethanol, dichloromethane, methanol and benzene under the reflux conditions (entries 11–14) and found that the reaction works better under solvent free conditions. The catalytic activity of the other ammonium derivatives such as NH4Cl (20 mol%) & nBu4NF was studied and found that none of them proved to be useful (entries 16, 17). A phosphorous salt, KPF6 was tried but only traces of 3a could be detected (entry 18). Proline (an organocatalyst) could not produce more that 8% of 3a (entry 19). PTSA (a Bronsted acid) gave the mixture of furan/pyran (45%, no regioselectivity) after 8 h (entry 20). NbCl5 (an oxophilic transition metal catalyst) could yield maximum of 60% of 3a at 120 °C (entry 21).

Having the conditions set for the Bu4NPF6 catalysed regioselective cascade synthesis of naphthofurans, we further studied the scope of the various naphthols (1, 4) and benzylic propargylic alcohols (2) in the methodology. The benzylic alcohol bearing 4-methyl substitution on the phenyl ring (2b) was reacted with 2-naphthol for 3 h to yield the naphthofuran 3b in 81% yield. Similarly 4-methoxy, 4-bromo and 4-fluoro derivatives (2c, 2d and 2e) furnished the respective naphthofurans 3c, 3d and 3e in 84, 92 & 80% respective yields (Table 2, first row). The second row of the Table 2 shows that naphthofuran derivatives 3f, 3g and 3h with methyl esters were synthesized in 86, 81 & 80% yields.

Table 2 Substrate scope of Bu4NPF6 catalyzed one-pot cascade synthesis of 2-alkyl, 3-aryl naphtho[2,1-b]furansa

image file: c6ra17411f-u2.tif

a Reaction conditions: 1 (1.1 eq.), 2 (1 eq.) Bu4NPF6 (0.2 eq.), 120 °C.b Oil bath temperature.
image file: c6ra17411f-u3.tif


6-Bromo-2-naphthol reacted with both the propargyl alcohols bearing ethyl & methyl esters to yield the corresponding naphtho[2,1-b]furans 3i–3n in good yields (Table 2, entries 3i–3n).

Encouraged by the reactivity of 2-naphthol derivatives towards the synthesis of naphtho[2,1-b]furans, we looked forward to make the complimentary class of furans i.e. naphtho[1,2-b]furans for which we used the 1-naphthol (4) against benzylic-propargylic alcohols (2). The initial product ethyl 2-(3-phenylnaphtho[1,2-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (5a) was realized in 92% yield after 2.5 h when 2a was treated with 1-naphthol under the optimum conditions (Table 3). In the similar fashion other benzylic-propargylic alcohols (2) bearing 4-methyl, 4-methoxy, 4-bromo, 4-chloro and 4-fluoro substitutions on the phenyl ring smoothly reacted with 1-naphthol to provide the corresponding naphtho[1,2-b]furans in good yields (Table 3, products 5b–5f). Methyl ester derivatives of 2 also reacted with 1-naphthol to furnish the 2-alkyl-3-arylnaphthofurans 5g–5i in 84%, 93, 81% yields. Similarly 6-methoxy-1-naphthol furnished the naphthofurans 5j & 5k in 75, 77% yields (Table 3).

Table 3 Substrate scope of Bu4NPF6 catalyzed one-pot cascade synthesis of 2-alkyl, 3-aryl naphthol[2,1-b]furansa

image file: c6ra17411f-u4.tif

a Reaction conditions: 1 (1.1 eq.), 2 (1 eq.) Bu4NPF6 (0.2 eq.), 120 °C.b Oil bath temperature.
image file: c6ra17411f-u5.tif


Further alkynol 10a (R = TMS) reacted with 2-naphthol under same conditions and yielded the 2-methyl, 3-phenyl naphthofuran 11 in 65% after 5 h (Scheme 1). Probably due to the presence of fluorine in the reaction (in the form of catalyst) the silyl group could have deprotected.1f 1-Phenylprop-2-yn-1-ol (10b, a terminal alkyne) gave the same 2-methyl, 3-phenyl naphthofuran 11 in 69% yield.


image file: c6ra17411f-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Regioselective studies of 1-naphthol with trimethylsilyl & terminal alkynes.

The scope of various phenols also has been investigated under the same reaction conditions (Scheme 2). When the reaction of alkynol 2a was performed with simple phenol, it could not yield the expected benzofuran but the corresponding benzyl ether was obtained. But in case of m-hydroxyanisole (which has two ortho-nucleophilic sites) and benzylic alcohol 2a, the reaction gave the regioisomeric benzofurans 6a & 6b in 33%, 39% isolated yields respectively after 4 h (Scheme 1). p-Cresol and o-cresol reacted with 2a and yielded benzofurans 6c and 6d in 83%, 81% yields. p-Cresol was also furnished the benzofuran 6e in 85% yield after 2 h (Scheme 2).


image file: c6ra17411f-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Scope of various substituted phenols.

The plausible mechanism for this cascade regioselective synthesis has been demonstrated in the Scheme 3. Initially benzylic alcohol 2 will undergo heat induced dehydration in presence of Bu4NPF6 to afford the dibenzyl ether 7 (isolated and characterized). At this temperature ether 7 will collapse to form the benzyl carbocation 7a and alcohol in a reversible pathway. Once the carbocation is available in the reaction mixture it will undergo nucleophilic substitution with naphthol (1a) to form the benzyl intermediate 7a1 (which was isolated and characterized).


image file: c6ra17411f-s3.tif
Scheme 3 The plausible mechanism for the Bu4NPF6 mediated regioselective synthesis of functionally embellished naphthofurans.

Further 7a1 undergoes 5-exo dig oxa-cyclisation (7a2), as the β-carbon is more electrophilic to be attacked by phenolic oxygen and the resultant α-carbanion is stabilized by the ester group. Protonation of 7a2 will lead to the formation of naphthofuran with exo cyclic double bond 7a3 (isolated and characterized), which further isomerizes to the final compound 3a.

To authenticate the mechanism proposed in the Scheme 3, ether 7 was isolated and separately treated with 2-naphthol under the same reaction conditions to obtain the naphthofuran 3a in 88% yield after 1.5 h (Fig. 3).


image file: c6ra17411f-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Reaction of dibenzyl ether (7) with 2-naphthol to obtain the naphthofuran 3a.

As we proposed in our regioselective conceptualization in Fig. 2, if ester group is replaced by a phenyl group the reaction should yield naphthopyrans instead of naphthofurans. This could be explained based on the mechanism proposed in the Scheme 3, the benzylated intermediate 7a1 (–CO2Et[double bond, length as m-dash]Ph) will undergo a 6-endo dig cyclisation as the benzylic position (α-carbon) is more electrophilic to be cyclised by the phenolic oxygen. In this case the 5 exo dig cyclisation is not preferred as the benzylic anion is less stable (7a2, –CO2Et[double bond, length as m-dash]Ph). To experimentally validate this, we performed a reaction with 2-naphthol and 1,3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-ol derivatives (Scheme 3, 8a–8c) at 120 °C using 20 mol% of Bu4NPF6 under neat conditions. Interestingly, all three alkynols 8a–8c gave the naphthopyrans 9a–9c (Scheme 4) in moderate yields after 4 h.21 Yields could not increase even after continuing the reactions till 12 h.


image file: c6ra17411f-s4.tif
Scheme 4 Bu4NPF6 regioselective synthesis of 2,3-diaryl naphthopyrans.

The utility of the 2-alkyl-3-aryl naphthofurans as the useful building blocks in the organic synthesis has been successfully delineated by functionalizing the sp3 C–H bond which is α to the ester functionality. Naphthofuran 3a was subjected to the DDQ mediated oxidative etherification22 (Scheme 5) with propargyl alcohol at room temperature for 12 h to yield the respective propargyl ether 12a in 72% yield. Naphthofuran 3c was also reacted with propargyl alcohol under same conditions and yielded the ether 12b in 70% yield. The resultant propargyl ethers (12a and 12b) were further subjected to the “click reaction” conditions with benzyl azides under standard conditions23 (CuI, NEt3, DMSO, rt) to isolate the triazole derivatives 13a–13d in 81–86% yields (Scheme 5).


image file: c6ra17411f-s5.tif
Scheme 5 Oxidative etherification followed by the triazole formation of 2-alkyl, 3-aryl naphthofurans through sp3 C–H functionalization.

Encouraged by the successful functionalization of sp3 C–H bond of 2-alkyl, 3-aryl naphthofurans to prepare propargyl ethers and triazoles, we decided to further look into the preparation of α-bromoesters which are well known building blocks & feed stock materials in the organic synthesis.24 α-Bromination of 3c was achieved by refluxing with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) in CCl4 for 10 h to furnish the α-bromoester 14 in 71% yield (Scheme 6).


image file: c6ra17411f-s6.tif
Scheme 6 Synthesis of α-bromoester derivative of naphthofuran 3c.

Anti-amyloid activity

Since naphthofuran derivatives and related compounds have been shown to interact with amyloid plaques,11 we were curious to explore their effect on amyloid formation. Selected three compounds were investigated for their anti-amyloidogenic properties. Compound 3f from 2-alkyl, 3-aryl naphtho[2,1-b]furans series and 5j, 5k from 2-alkyl, 3-aryl naphtho[1,2-b]furans series were selected as representatives of the two categories of compounds reported in this work. Compound 5k was also selected to see if fluoro-substitution brings any additional change in these studies. Amyloid binding compounds having a fluoro-substitution can be of potential application for positron emitting tomography (PET).25

We performed the inhibition assays using lysozyme enzyme from chicken egg white as it is a readily available amyloid forming protein.26 Thioflavin-T (ThT) assay were used to monitor the progress of aggregation.27 Interestingly, these three compounds inhibit lysozyme aggregation by 85, 92 and 90%, respectively (Fig. 4). The results suggest that naphthofuran framework is a good inhibitor of amyloid formation and minor substitution may not bring any big change. Although we anticipated some inhibition by these compounds given previous reports, a complete inhibition of lysozyme fibrilization is unprecedented and deserves more investigation in future.


image file: c6ra17411f-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (Top) Normalized ThT fluorescence intensities for lysozyme fibrils without inhibitors and with inhibitors 3f, 5j and 5k, respectively; (bottom) thioflavin-T (ThT) fluorescence spectra with lysozyme fibrils without inhibitors and lysozyme fibrils containing inhibitors 3f, 5j, and 5k, respectively.

Experimental section

General information

Unless otherwise noted, all reagents were used as received from commercial suppliers. Bu4NPF6 catalyst were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. THF was dried in the presence of sodium metal using benzophenone as indicator and distilled prior to use. Reactions were monitored using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) with aluminium sheets silica gel 60 F254 from Merck. TLC plates were visualized with UV light (254 nm), iodine treatment or using p-anisaldehyde or KMNO4 stain. Column chromatography was carried out using silica gel 60–120 mesh as stationary phase. NMR spectra were recorded at 500 MHz (H) and at 125 MHz (C), respectively on Avance Bruker spectrometer. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm, using the residual solvent peak in CDCl3 (H: δ = 7.26 and C: δ = 77.0 ppm) as internal standard, and coupling constants (J) are given in Hz. HRMS was recorded using ESI-TOF techniques. Melting points were measured with Büchi Melting Point B-540 apparatus.
General experimental procedure for the synthesis of propargylic alcohol derivatives (2, 8 & 10)1h. LHMDS (1.2 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of alkyl propiolate or phenyl acetylene (1.1 mmol) in dry THF (15 ml) at −78 °C and stirred for 30 minutes at the same temperature. Aryl aldehyde (1 mmol) was added slowly to the reaction mixture at −78 °C and the reaction progress was monitored by TLC. After completion, the reaction was brought to rt, quenched with aq-saturated NH4Cl and extracted into EtOAc thrice. The combined organic layers were washed with brine solution and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (8–10% EtOAc in pet-ether) to obtain the desired products 2, 8 or 10.
General procedure for the Bu4NPF6 catalyzed synthesis of 2-alkyl, -aryl naphthofurans (3, 5, 9, & 11). A mixer of suitable propargylic alcohol (2, 8 or 10, 1.0 mmol) and naphthol 1 or 4 (1.1 mmol) was heated at 120 °C in presence of Bu4NPF6 (20 mol%) for 1.5–5 h. After completion of reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was diluted with water, extracted with EtOAc thrice, the combined organic layers were washed with brine solution and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. Solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (3–5%, EtOAc in pet ether) to obtain the desired product 3, 5, 9 & 11.
Ethyl 2-(1-phenylnaphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3a)10a. Light yellow solid; (76.6 mg, 72%); mp 79–80.5 °C; δ 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.79–7.76 (m, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.52 (m, 5H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.23–4.12 (m, 2H), 3.78 (s, 2H), 1.29 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.3, 151.9, 146.9, 133.2, 130.8, 130.4, 128.9, 128.8, 128.5, 128.3, 128.0, 125.9, 125.5, 124.2, 123.1, 121.9, 112.4, 61.4, 33.0, 14.2 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3063, 2974, 2915, 1738, 1572, 1447, 1395, 1318, 1189 cm−1, HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H18O3 [M + Na]+ 353.1157; found 353.1165.
Ethyl 2-(1-(p-tolyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3b)7. Light orange solid; (64.1 mg, 81%); mp 70.5–72.5 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.7 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.42–7.47 (m, 3H), 7.38–7.32 (m, 3H), 4.24–4.20 (m, 2H), 3.79 (s, 2H), 2.52 (s, 3H), 1.29 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.4, 151.8, 146.8, 137.7, 130.8, 130.3, 130.1, 129.5, 128.8, 128.1, 125.9, 125.4, 124.2, 123.2, 121.6, 118.0, 112.4, 61.4, 33.0, 21.4, 14.2 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3020, 2925, 1735, 1216, 759, 669 cm−1, HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H20O3 [M + H]+ 345.1490; found 345.1494.
Ethyl 2-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3c)10a. Light orange viscous liquid; (64.8 mg, 84%); δ 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.90 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.46–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.41 (m, 1H), 7.39–7.31 (m, 1H), 7.05 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.16–4.20 (m, 2H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 2H), 1.25 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.4, 159.4, 151.8, 146.9, 131.6, 130.8, 128.9, 128.2, 125.9, 125.4, 125.2, 124.2, 123.1, 122.2, 121.3, 114.2, 112.4, 61.4, 55.4, 33.0, 14.2 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3048, 2923, 2834, 1735, 1598, 1576, 1510, 1462, 1392, 1248, 1179, 1027, 806 cm−1, HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H20O4 [M + Na]+ 383.1259; found 383.1255.
Ethyl 2-(1-(4-bromophenyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3d)10a. Sticky white solid; (71.0 mg, 92%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.96 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 7.7 (d, J = 8 Hz, 3H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 3H), 7.37 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 4.24–4.20 (m, 2H), 3.77 (s, 2H), 1.29 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.1, 151.9, 146.9, 132.3, 132.1, 132.0, 130.8, 129, 127.8, 126.1, 125.8, 124.4, 122.9, 122.3, 121.6, 120.6, 112.3, 61.5, 33.0, 14.2 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3055, 2982, 2923, 1735, 1576, 1488, 1388, 1362 cm−1, HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H17BrO3 [M + Na]+ 431.0258; found 431.0250.
Ethyl 2-(1-(4-fluorophenyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3e). Pale green viscous; (62.6 mg, 80%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.78–7.71 (m, 2H), 7.57–7.54 (m, 2H), 7.46–7.43 (m, 1H), 7.37–7.35 (m, 1H), 7.25 (dd, J = 1.5 Hz, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 4.24–4.21 (m, 2H), 3.77 (s, 2H), 1.29 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.2, 163.7, 161.7, 151.8, 147.0, 132.2, 132.1, 130.8, 129.0, 128.0, 126.0, 125.7, 124.3, 122.9, 115.9, 115.8, 112.4, 61.5, 33.0, 14.2 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3063, 2974, 2915, 1738, 1572, 1447, 1395, 1318, 1189 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H17FO3 [M + Na]+ 371.1059; found 371.1062.
Methyl 2-(1-(p-tolyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3f). Light yellow viscous liquid; (69.6 mg, 86%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.94 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.47–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.36 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (s, 3H), 3.81 (s, 2H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 2.52 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.9, 151.9, 146.6, 137.8, 130.8, 130.3, 130.0, 129.5, 128.9, 128.2, 125.9, 125.5, 124.2, 123.2, 122.0, 121.7, 112.3, 52.5, 32.8, 21.4 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3060, 2974, 2915, 1738, 1572, 1447, 1395, 1318, 1180 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H18O3 [M + Na]+ 353.1157; found 353.1165.
Methyl 2-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3g). Pale orange viscous liquid; (63.7 mg, 81%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.94 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.48 (dd, J = 2 Hz, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.10–7.08 (m, 2H), 7.08–7.02 (m, 1H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 3.8 (s, 2H), 3.76 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.7, 159.4, 151.9, 146.7, 132.0, 131.5, 130.8, 128.9, 128.2, 125.9, 125.5, 125.1, 124.2, 123.1, 121.3, 114.3, 112.3, 55.4, 52.5, 32.7 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3063, 2974, 2915, 1738, 1572, 1447, 1395, 1318, 1189 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H18O4 [M + H]+ 347.1283; found 347.1282.
Methyl 2-(1-phenylnaphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3h). Yellow viscous liquid; (66.3 mg, 80%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.93 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.77–7.68 (m, 3H), 7.56–7.51 (m, 5H), 7.43–7.33 (m, 2H), 1.99 (s, 2H), 3.75 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 168.5, 150.6, 145.4, 131.9, 129.5, 129.1, 127.6, 127.5, 126.8, 124.7, 124.3, 123.0, 121.9, 121.6, 120.6, 120.5, 111.1, 51.2, 31.5 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3063, 2974, 2915, 1738, 1572, 1447, 1395, 1318, 1180 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C21H16O3 [M + H]+ 317.1177; found 317.1179.
Ethyl 2-(7-bromo-1-phenylnaphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3i). Orange viscous liquid; (61.0 mg, 79%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.09 (d, J = 2 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.67–7.63 (m, 2H), 7.55 (d, J = 9 Hz, 5H), 7.40–7.38 (m, 1H), 4.24–4.20 (m, 2H), 3.79 (s, 2H), 1.30 (t, J = 14 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.2, 151.9, 147.4, 132.8, 132.1, 130.8, 130.3, 129.1, 128.9, 128.2, 126.5, 124.8, 124.5, 122.1, 121.5, 118.0, 113.4, 61.5, 33.0, 14.2 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H17BrO3 [M + Na]+ 431.0258; found 431.0237.
Ethyl 2-(7-bromo-1-(4-fluorophenyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3j). Orange viscous liquid; (61.9 mg, 82%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.09 (d, J = 2 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (s, 1H), 7.50–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.42 (s, 1H), 7.26 (t, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 4.20–4.24 (m, 2H), 3.77 (s, 2H), 1.29 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.1, 163.8, 161.8, 151.8, 147.6, 132.1, 132.0, 130.9, 129.2, 126.4, 124.6, 124.5, 120.5, 118.1, 116.1, 115.9, 113.4, 61.5, 32.9, 14.1 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H16BrFO3 [M + Na]+ 449.0164; found 449.0145.
Ethyl 2-(7-bromo-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3k). Light orange viscous liquid; (62.8 mg, 84%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.06 (d, J = 2 Hz, 1H), 7.69–7.62 (m, 3H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (dd, J = 2 Hz, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.43–4.19 (m, 2H), 3.94 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 1.29 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.3, 159.5, 151.8, 147.4, 132.1, 131.5, 130.8, 129.1, 126.6, 124.8, 124.4, 122.4, 121.1, 117.9, 114.3, 113.8, 113.4, 61.4, 55.4, 33.0, 14.2 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H19BrO4 [M + H]+ 439.0544; found 439.0540.
Ethyl 2-(7-bromo-1-(p-tolyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3l). Light yellow viscous liquid; (62.6 mg, 85%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.08 (d, J = 2 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (t, J = 10 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.42–7.40 (m, 3H), 7.36 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 4.24–4.20 (m, 2H), 3.79 (s, 2H), 2.51 (s, 3H), 1.29 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.2, 151.9, 147.4, 138.0, 132.1, 130.8, 130.2, 129.7, 129.6, 129, 126.6, 124.9, 124.4, 122.2, 121.4, 117.9, 113.4, 61.4, 33.0, 21.4, 14 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3063, 2974, 2915, 1738, 1572, 1447, 1395, 1318, 1189 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H19BrO3 [M + Na]+ 445.0415; found 445.0395.
Methyl 2-(7-bromo-1-(p-tolyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3m). Light yellow solid; (67.9 mg, 88%); mp 139–141 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.08 (d, J = 2 Hz, 1H), 7.72–7.64 (m, 3H), 7.43–7.39 (m, 3H), 7.36 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 3.80 (s, 2H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 2.51 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.7, 151.9, 147.1, 138, 132.1, 130.8, 130.1, 129.7, 129.6, 129.1, 126.6, 124.9, 124.5, 122.2, 121.5, 118.0, 113.4, 52.5, 32.7, 21.4 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H17BrO3 [M + Na]+ 431.0258; found 431.0250.
Methyl 2-(7-bromo-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (3n). Light orange viscous liquid; (63.6 mg, 84%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.08 (d, J = 2 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.71–7.64 (m, 3H), 7.46–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.08 (dd, J = 2 Hz, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 3.8 (s, 2H), 3.75 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.7, 159.5, 151.8, 147.2, 132.1, 131.4, 130.8, 129.1, 126.6, 124.8, 124.4, 122.3, 121.2, 118, 114.3 (2C), 113.4, 55.4, 52.5, 32.7 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3063, 2974, 2915, 1738, 1570, 1447, 1395, 1318, 1180 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H17BrO4 [M + Na]+ 447.0207; found 447.0193.
Ethyl 2-(3-phenylnaphtho[1,2-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (5a)10a. Orange sticky solid; (74.4 mg, 92%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.81–7.78 (m, 2H), 7.7 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.57–7.54 (m, 4H), 7.45–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.34–7.31 (m, 1H), 4.24–4.20 (m, 2H), 3.79 (s, 2H), 1.29 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.3, 151.9, 146.9, 130.8, 130.4, 128.9, 128.8, 128.5, 128.3, 128.1, 126.8, 125.9, 125.5, 124.2, 123.1, 118.0, 112.4, 61.4, 33.0, 14.2 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3055, 2982, 2922, 1735, 1580, 1443, 1377, 1252, 1182, 1027, 982 cm−1, HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H18O3 [M + Na]+ 353.1157; found 353.1164.
Ethyl 2-(3-(p-tolyl)naphtho[1,2-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (5b)7. Light yellow viscous liquid; (69.7 mg, 88%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.94 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 8 Hz, 3H), 7.34 (m, 3H), 4.24–4.20 (m, 2H), 3.78 (s, 2H), 2.51 (s, 3H), 1.28 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.42, 151.8, 146.8, 137.7, 130.7, 130.3, 130.1, 129.5, 128.8, 128.1, 125.8, 125.4, 124.2, 123.2, 122.0, 121.6, 112.4, 61.4, 33.0, 21.4, 14.2, ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3022, 2983, 2926, 1737, 1513, 1382, 1258, 1216, 812, 758 cm−1, HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H20O3 [M + Na]+ 367.1310; found 367.1314.
Ethyl 2-(3-(4-methoxyphenyl)naphtho[1,2-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (5c)10a. Orange solid; (71.8 mg, 93%); mp 85–87 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.46–7.43 (m, 1H), 7.37–7.32 (t, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 4.26–4.21 (m, 2H), 3.95 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 2H), 1.3 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.4, 159.4, 151.8, 146.9, 131.6, 130.8, 128.9, 128.2, 125.9, 125.4, 125.2, 124.2, 123.13, 122.2, 121.3, 114.2, 112.4, 61.4, 55.4, 33.0, 14.2 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 2915, 2836, 1741, 1515, 1459, 1381, 1250, 1179 cm−1, HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H20O4 [M + Na]+ 383.1259; found 383.1255.
Ethyl 2-(3-(4-bromophenyl)naphtho[1,2-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (5d)10a. Orange solid; (65.6 mg, 85%); mp 87–89.5 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (t, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 7.70 (dd, J = 2 Hz, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 7.48–7.45 (m, 3H), 7.38 (dd, J = 1.5 Hz, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.24–4.20 (m, 2H), 3.77 (s, 2H), 1.3 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.1, 151.9, 146.9, 132.3, 132.1, 132.0, 130.1, 129.0, 127.9, 126.1, 127.9, 126.1, 125.8, 124.4, 122.9, 122.3, 121.6, 120.6, 112.4, 61.5, 33.0, 14.2 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3055, 2923, 2843, 1735, 1488, 1377, 1253, 1189 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H17BrO3 [M + Na]+ 431.0258; found 431.0259.
Ethyl 2-(1-(4-chlorophenyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (5e)10a. Yellow solid; (57.3 mg, 75%); mp 62–63.5 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.83 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (t, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 3H), 7.35–7.31 (m, 3H), 7.26–7.23 (m, 1H), 4.1 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 3.65 (s, 2H), 1.17 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.1, 159.1, 146.6, 131.3, 130.5, 128.6, 127.9, 125.6, 125.1, 124.9, 123.9, 122.8, 121.9, 121.0, 113.9, 112.1, 61.1, 55.1, 32.7, 13.9 ppm; IR (KBr): ν 3055, 2923, 2841, 1735, 1490, 1377, 1255, 1189, 1086 cm−1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H17ClO3 [M + Na]+ 387.0764; found 387.0773.
Ethyl 2-(3-(4-fluorophenyl)naphtho[1,2-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (5f). Orange viscous liquid; (66.5 mg, 85%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 7.95 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.74–7.69 (m, 2H), 7.56–7.54 (m, 2H), 7.53 (s, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (t, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.26 (m, 1H), 4.24–4.20 (m, 2H), 3.77 (s, 2H), 1.29 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.2, 163.7, 161.7, 151.8, 147.0, 132.2, 132.1, 130.8, 129.0, 128.0, 126.0, 125.7, 124.3, 122.9, 115.9, 115.8, 112.4, 61.5, 33.0, 14.2 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H17FO3 [M + Na]+ 371.1059; found 371.1062.
Methyl 2-(3-(4-methoxyphenyl)naphtho[1,2-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (5g). Light orange viscous liquid; (66.1 mg, 84%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.87 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 2 Hz, 2H), 7.45–7.41 (m, 1H), 7.36–7.32 (m, 1H), 7.11–7.03 (m, 2H), 3.95 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 2H), 3.76 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.9, 159.4, 151.8, 146.6, 131.5, 130.8, 128.9, 128.2, 125.9, 125.5, 125.1, 124.2, 123.1, 122.1, 114.3, 114.2, 112.3, 55.4, 52.5, 32.8 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H18O4 [M + H]+ 347.1283; found 347.1281.
Methyl 2-(3-(p-tolyl)naphtho[1,2-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (5h). Light yellow viscous liquid; (75.2 mg, 93%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.7 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.47–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.38 (s, 1H), 7.37–7.33 (m, 3H), 3.82 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 2.52 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): 169.9, 151.9, 146.6, 137.8, 130.8, 130.3, 130.0, 129.5, 128.9, 128.2, 125.9, 125.5, 124.2, 123.2, 122.0, 121.7, 112.4, 52.5, 32.8, 21.4 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H18O3 [M + Na]+ 353.1153; found 353.1138.
Methyl 2-(3-phenylnaphtho[1,2-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (5i). Light yellow viscous liquid; (67.1 mg, 81%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (dd, J = 6 Hz, J = 9 Hz, 3H), 7.57–7.56 (m, 4H), 7.55–7.52 (m, 1H), 7.44–7.41 (m, 1H), 7.34–7.31 (m, 1H), 3.81 (s, 2H), 3.76 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.8, 151.9, 146.3, 135.8, 133.2, 130.8, 130.4, 128.9, 128.8, 128.1, 125.9, 125.6, 124.3, 123.1, 121.9, 121.7, 112.3, 52.5, 32.8 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C21H16O3 [M + H]+ 317.1177; found 317.1176.
Ethyl 2-(5-methoxy-3-phenylnaphtho[1,2-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (5j). Pale green gummy; (59 mg, 75%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.33 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 8.29 (dd, J = 1 Hz, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.63–7.61 (m, 3H), 7.57 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.54–7.45 (m, 3H), 4.24–4.28 (m, 2H), 4.01 (s, 3H), 3.96 (s, 2H), 1.31 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.5, 152.4, 146.0, 132.4, 129.1, 128.6, 127.5, 126.9, 125.2, 124.6, 124.1, 123.0, 122.9, 121.6, 121.2, 119.9, 95.6, 61.4, 55.9, 33.6, 14.2 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H20O4 [M + Na]+ 383.1259; found 383.1255.
Ethyl 2-(3-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-methoxynaphtho[1,2-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (5k). Brown solid; (58.8 mg, 77%); mp 100–102 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.30 (dd, J = 1.5 Hz, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.66–7.64 (m, 1H), 7.63–7.58 (m, 2H), 7.54–7.51 (m, 1H), 7.27–7.24 (m, 2H), 6.88 (s, 1H), 4.28–4.24 (m, 2H), 4.01 (s, 3H), 3.92 (s, 2H), 1.32 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.4, 152.5, 146.0, 144.8, 130.8, 130.7, 127.0, 124.7, 124.1, 123.0, 122.9, 121.6, 120.3, 119.9, 116.1, 115.9, 95.3, 61.5, 55.9, 33.5, 14.2 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H19FO4 [M + H]+ 379.1345; found 379.1345.
Ethyl 2-(6-methoxy-3-phenylbenzofuran-2-yl)acetate (6b). Light yellow viscous liquid; (26.9 mg, 39%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.48–7.44 (m, 3H), 7.31 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.76 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.91–6.89 (m, 1H), 4.24–4.22 (m, 2H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.85 (s, 2H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 1.30 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 169.5, 158.1, 155.3, 145.4, 137.3, 129.6, 129.0, 128.8, 121.8, 120.1, 119.5, 111.7, 95.9, 61.4, 55.8, 33.4, 21.3, 14.2 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C20H20O4 [M + Na]+ 347.1259; found 347.1243.
Diethyl 4,4′-oxybis(4-phenylbut-2-ynoate) (7). Colourless liquid; (37 mg, 88%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.49–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.43–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.32 (m, 6H), 5.64 (s, 1H), 5.29 (s, 1H), 4.24–4.18 (m, 4H), 1.3–1.25 (m, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 153.1, 153, 135.9, 135.6, 129.5, 129.2, 129, 128.8, 127.9, 127.7, 83.5, 83.2, 79.9, 79.3, 69.6, 69, 62.4, 62.3, 14.05, 14.03 ppm. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C24H22O5 [M + Na]+ 413.1364; found 413.1360.
Ethyl 4-(2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)-4-phenylbut-2-ynoate (7a1). Pale yellow liquid; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.77 (s, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 7.38–7.30 (m, 3H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 5.41 (s, 1H), 5.27 (s, 1H), 4.31–4.27 (m, 2H), 1.35 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 153.8, 139.4, 134.4, 133.8, 129.9, 128, 128.7, 128, 127.6, 127.5, 127.2, 126.6, 126.4, 118.3, 109.4, 88.2, 62.2, 43, 14.1 ppm. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C22H18O3 [M + Na]+ 353.1157; found 353.1165.
Ethyl-2-(1-(p-tolyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2(1H)-ylidene)acetate (7a3). Yellow viscous liquid; (48.5 mg, 68%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.85–7.83 (m, 2H), 7.65 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (t, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 6.07 (s, 1H), 5.85 (d, J = 2 Hz, 1H), 4.13 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.28 (s, 3H), 1.26 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 177.3, 166.4, 153.1, 137.1, 136.5, 130.8, 130.3, 130.2, 129.5, 129.3, 129.1, 129, 128.5, 127.4, 124.2, 123.2, 122.9, 111.2, 95.7, 59.8, 51.1, 21.1, 14.4 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H20O3 [M + H]+ 345.1490; found 345.1494.
2,4-Diphenyl-4H-benzo[h]chromene (9a)28. Yellow solid; (48.8 mg, 60%); mp 200–203 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.83 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.78 (t, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H), 7.46–7.38 (m, 4H), 7.39–7.37 (m, 2H), 7.33–7.31 (m, 3H), 7.29 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2H), 5.85 (d, J = 5 Hz, 1H), 5.4 (d, J = 5 Hz, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.6, 146.6, 146.3, 133.9, 131.7, 131, 130.6, 129, 128.8, 128.4, 128.3, 127.7, 125.5, 125, 124.7, 124.1, 123.7, 118.1, 114.3, 102.2, 39.2 ppm.
1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-phenyl-1H-benzo[f]chromene (9b)28. White solid; (46.7 mg, 61%); mp 198–200 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.8 (t, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.72–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.64 (s, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (s, 1H), 7.32–7.26 (m, 3H), 7.16 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.71 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.71 (d, J = 5 Hz, 1H), 5.22 (d, J = 5 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.1, 149.2, 145.1, 138.3, 136.1, 131.6, 131.3, 129.8, 129, 128.7, 127.7, 126.6, 124.2, 123.6, 123.2, 122.6, 118, 114.4, 114.2, 103.5, 55.2, 38.2 ppm.
1-(4-Bromophenyl)-3-phenyl-1H-benzo[f]chromene (9c). Light yellow solid; (41.8 mg, 60%); mp 176–178 °C 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.73 (d, J = 3 Hz, 2H), 7.58–7.56 (m, t, J = 10 Hz, 1H), 7.52–7.51 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.29 (m, J = 6H), 7.02–7.05 (m, 2H), 5.67 (d, J = 5 Hz, 1H), 5.24 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.4, 146.1, 145.1, 132.7, 132, 131.5, 131.4, 131.1, 129.4, 129.3, 128.5, 126.8, 126.3, 124.4, 123.4, 122.7, 120.4, 117.9, 113.5, 102, 38 ppm; (ESI) m/z for C25H17BrO [M + H]+ 413.0540; found 413.0526.
2-Methyl-1-phenylnaphtho[2,1-b]furan (11)8. Brown liquid; (40.3 mg, 65%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (t, J = 8 Hz, 4H), 7.51 (d, J = 2 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 150.2, 134.3, 130.7, 130.5, 129.2, 128.8, 128, 127.9, 127.6, 125.6, 124.5, 124, 123.2, 122.3, 119, 112, 12.3 ppm.
General procedure for the oxidative C(sp3)–H functionalization of 2,3-disubstituted naphthofurans (12)5. To a stirred solution of propargyl alcohol 2 (2 ml) and naphthofuran 3a or 3c (1 mmol) in dichloromethane was added DDQ (2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone) (2 mmol) at rt. The mixture was continued for 12 h. After completion of reaction (monitored by TLC), reaction mixture was diluted with water, neutralized with Na2CO3 and extracted with dichloromethane thrice. The combined organic layers were washed with brine solution and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (12–14%, EtOAc in pet ether) to obtain desired product 12.
Ethyl 2-(1-phenylnaphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)-2-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)acetate (12a). Pink oily liquid; (45.5 mg, 72%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.96 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.84–7.78 (m, 2H), 7.73 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.6–7.56 (m, 3H), 7.48–7.44 (m, 1H), 7.38–7.35 (m, 1H), 5.39 (s, 1H), 4.36–4.2 (m, 4H), 2.23 (s, 1H), 1.23 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 168.1, 152.4, 146.3, 132.1, 130.8, 130.7, 130.6, 129, 128.8, 128.7, 128.4, 128.2, 127, 126.3, 125.1, 124.6, 123.1, 121.3, 112.7, 78, 75.8, 70.3, 62, 56.4, 14.1 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C25H20O4 [M + Na]+ 407.1259; found 407.1231.
Ethyl 2-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)-2-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)acetate (12b). Pink viscous liquid; (43.1 mg, 70%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (t, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (t, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (m, 2H), 5.38 (s, 1H), 4.35–4.23 (m, 4H), 3.96 (s, 3H), 2.27 (s, 1H), 1.28 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 168.1, 159.7, 152.3, 146.2, 131.9, 131.7, 130.8, 129, 128.3, 126.8, 126.3, 124.7, 124.5, 124.1, 123.1, 121.6, 114.3, 113.9, 112.7, 78.1, 75.8, 70.4, 62, 56.4, 55.4, 14.1 ppm. (ESI) m/z for C26H22O5 [M + H]+ 415.1545; found 415.1534.
General procedure for the synthesis of triazole formation from 12 (13). To a stirred solution of terminal alkyne 12a or 12b (1 mmol) and benzyl azide (1.5 mmol) in DMSO (1.5 ml) was added Et3N (0.4 mmol) and CuI (10 mol%) at rt. After completion (monitored by TLC) of the reaction, the reaction mixture was diluted with cold water and extracted with EtOAc thrice. The combined organic layers were washed with brine solution and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. Solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography (30–40%, EtOAc in pet ether) to obtain desired triazole products 13.
Ethyl 2-((1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-2-(1-phenylnaphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (13a). Yellow sticky solid; (81.2 mg, 81%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.7 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.54 (m, 5H), 7.42 (t, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.33 (m, 5H), 7.24 (t, J = 3 Hz, 2H), 5.44 (q, J = 18.5 Hz, 2H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 4.71 (q, J = 11.5 Hz, 2H), 4.24 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.26 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 168.3, 152.3, 146.7, 144.5, 134.4, 132.2, 130.8, 130.7, 130.4, 129.1, 129, 128.9, 128.8, 128.4, 128.2, 128.1, 126.9, 126.3, 124.6, 124.4, 123.1, 122.8, 121.3, 112.7, 71.8, 63.2, 61.9, 54.1, 14.1 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C32H27N3O4 [M + H]+ 518.2079; found 518.2088.
Ethyl 2-((1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-2-(1-phenylnaphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (13b). Light yellow sticky solid; (76.8 mg, 83%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.96 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (s, 4H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.36–7.33 (m, 5H), 7.72–7.22 (m, 2H), 5.77–5.71 (m, 1H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 4.75–4.71 (m, 2H), 4.28–4.21 (m, 2H), 1.91 (dd, J = 17 Hz, J = 17.5 Hz, 3H), 1.27 (t, J = 4.5 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): partially rotamers, δ 168.3, 152.2, 146.8, 144.1, 144.0, 139.8, 139.7, 132.1, 132.1, 130.8, 130.6, 130.3, 129, 128.9, 128.8, 128.6, 128.56, 128.55, 128.4, 128.2, 126.9, 126.6, 126.5, 126.3, 124.6, 124.43, 124.41, 123.1, 121.7, 121.5, 121.4, 112.7, 72, 71.9, 63.4, 63.3, 62, 60.3, 60.2, 21.3, 21.2, 14.1 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C33H29N3O4 [M + H]+ 532.2236; found 532.2246.
Ethyl 2-((1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-2-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (13c). Light yellow sticky solid; (93.1 mg, 88%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.03 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.91 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.47–7.25 (m, 9H), 7.14–7.06 (m, 2H), 5.53 (s, 2H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 4.57 (q, J = 17.5 Hz, 2H), 4.08 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 1.11 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 173.1, 164.5, 156.6, 152.6, 148.4, 141.1, 136.8, 136.5, 135.7, 133.9, 133.4, 133.1, 132.8, 132.1, 131.7, 129.9, 128.4, 128.1, 127.4, 126, 119.6, 117.8, 76.1, 67.3, 66.6, 60.4, 57.9, 19.1 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C33H29N3O5 [M + Na]+ 570.1999; found 570.2045.
Ethyl 2-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)-2-((1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)acetate (13d). Yellow sticky solid; (83.9 mg, 86%); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.69 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 7.38–7.32 (m, 5H), 7.24–7.21 (m, 2H), 7.09 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.77–5.69 (m, 1H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 4.71 (s, 2H), 4.24 (q, J = 4 Hz, 2H), 3.96 (s, 3H), 1.9 (dd, J = 21 Hz, J = 21 Hz, 3H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): partially rotamers, δ 168.4, 152.2, 146.7, 144.2, 131.8, 130.8, 129, 129, 128.5, 128.5, 128.3, 126.8, 126.6, 126.5, 126.2, 124.5, 124.1, 124, 123.1, 121.6, 121.4, 114.4, 112.7, 72, 63.4, 63.3, 61.9, 60.3, 60.1, 55.4, 21.3, 21.2, 14.1 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C34H31N3O5 [M + H]+ 562.2341; found 562.2354.
Ethyl 2-bromo-2-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)naphtha[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)acetate (14). Light brown viscous liquid; (42.9 mg, 71%) 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.28 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.45 (m, 8H), 7.35 (t, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 6.13 (s, 1H), 4.07 (q, J = 4 Hz, 2H), 3.44 (s, 3H), 1.14 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.8, 167.3, 145, 131.6, 131.3, 130.3, 129.9, 129.4, 128.7, 128.3, 127.9, 127.4, 127.2, 125.2, 123.2, 122.8, 114.9, 100.8, 60.9, 50.6, 40.9, 14.1 ppm; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C23H19BrO4 [M + H]+ 439.0544; found 439.0540.

Lysozyme fibrilization experiment

Lysozyme from chicken egg white was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (catalog number L6876). Lysozyme fibrils were prepared by dissolving monomeric lysozyme films in DMSO, diluting into the PBS buffer to a final concentration of 20 μM. The resulting solutions were incubated for 72 h at 60 °C with continuous agitation (final DMSO concentration was <2%). For aggregation inhibition studies, inhibitors (20 μM final concentration using a 2 mM stock solution in DMSO) were added to lysozyme solutions and then incubated for 72 h at 60 °C with constant agitation.

Fluorescence measurements

All fluorescence measurements were performed using a Perkin Elmer fluorescence spectrometer (model no. LS55). For ThT fluorescence studies, samples were diluted to a final lysozyme concentration of 2.5 μM in PBS containing ThT (10 μM) and the fluorescence intensities were measured at 485 nm (λex = 435 nm).

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have developed an Bu4NPF6 catalyzed, acid, metal and solvent free, regioselective one pot cascade synthesis of 2-alkyl, 3-aryl naphthofurans from the easily available reactants under simple reaction conditions. Control experiments have been performed to justify the mechanism. The utility of the synthetic compounds has also been illustrated successfully by synthesizing the α-bromo esters, ethers and triazole derivatives. Atom and step economy, large substrate scope, high yields and short reaction time make this methodology superior to the existing metal catalysed and multistep procedures. In addition, the biological relevance of these compounds has been established for selected compounds. ThT fluorescence data for the lysozyme aggregation clearly suggest that complete arrest of aggregation process occurred when these compounds were added in fibrilization conditions. This preliminary anti-amyloidogenic feature of these compounds is being explored further in our laboratories.

Acknowledgements

Science and Engineering Research Board (DST-SERB) India is acknowledged for the financial support through Fast Track Young Scientist programme (No. SB/FT/CS-149/2012). AP, RD & MR thank Central University of Rajasthan for their fellowships. AKS thank DST-INSPIRE programme for research grant IFA-13, CH-97. The authors are thankful to Dr Rambabu Chegondi for the technical support.

Notes and references

  1. (a) H. Khanam and Shamsuzzaman, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2015, 97, 483 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) V. Srivastava, A. S. Negi, J. K. Kumar, U. Faridi, B. S. Sisodia, M. P. Darokar, S. Luqman and S. P. S. Khanuja, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2006, 16, 911 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) R. R. V. Rao, K. S. Chaturvedi, P. P. Babu, V. R. Reddy, S. Rao, P. Sreekanth, A. S. Sreedhar and J. M. Rao, Med. Chem. Res., 2012, 21, 634 CrossRef CAS; (d) D. J. Kerr, E. M. Hamel, K. Jung and B. L. Flynn, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2007, 15, 3290 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) J. H. Tatum, R. A. Baker and R. E. Berry, Phytochemistry, 1987, 26, 2499 CrossRef CAS; (f) M. W. Khan, M. J. Alam, M. A. Rashid and R. Chowdhury, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2005, 13, 4796 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) N. Zanatta, S. H. Alves, H. S. Coelho, D. M. Borchhardt, P. Machado, K. M. Flores, F. M. Silva, T. B. Spader, J. M. Santurio, H. G. Bonacorso and M. A. P. Martins, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2007, 15, 1947 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (h) S. Yaragorla, R. Dada, A. Pareek and G. Singh, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 28865 RSC and references cited therein.
  2. P. P. Gupta, R. C. Srimal, N. Verma and J. S. Tandon, Pharm. Biol., 1999, 37, 46 CrossRef CAS; J. Ito, Y. Takaya, Y. Oshima and M. Niwa, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 2529 CrossRef; L. Chiummiento, M. Funicello, M. T. Lopardo, P. Lupattelli, S. Choppin and F. Colobert, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2012, 188 CrossRef; R. J. Salmon, J. P. Buisson, B. Zafrani, L. Aussepe and R. Royer, Carcinogenesis, 1986, 7, 1447 CrossRef PubMed.
  3. (a) G. Schulte, P. J. Schener and O. McConnel, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1980, 63, 2159 CrossRef CAS; (b) F. M. Dean, Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry, ed. A. R. Katritzky, Academic Press, New York, 1982, vol. 30, p. 167 Search PubMed; (c) H. Wagner and B. Fessler, Planta Med., 1986, 52, 374 CrossRef; (d) P. A. Jacobi and H. G. Selnick, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 202 CrossRef CAS; (e) J. Lee, J.-H. Li, S. Oya and J. K. Snyder, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 5301 CrossRef CAS; (f) K. Kobayashi, H. Shimizu, A. Sasaki and H. Suginome, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 1170 CrossRef; (g) A. F. Furstner and H. Weintritt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 2817 CrossRef; (h) A. F. Furstner, K. Reinecke and H. H. Waldmann, ChemBioChem, 2004, 5, 1575 CrossRef PubMed.
  4. (a) J. Kim, H. Kim and B. Park, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 14629 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) M. E. Welsch, S. A. Snyder and B. R. Stockwell, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2010, 14, 347 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. R. L. Guevel, F. Oger, A. Lecorgne, Z. Dudasova, S. Chevance, A. Bondon, P. Barath, G. Simonneaux and G. Salbert, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2009, 17, 7021 CrossRef PubMed.
  6. For selected example see: (a) W.-T. Li, W.-H. Nan and Q.-L. Luo, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 34774 RSC; (b) Y.-C. Wu, L. Liu, Z. Shafiq, Y.-C. Wu, D. Wang and Y.-J. Chen, Synthesis, 2007, 1961 Search PubMed; (c) C.-R. Liu, M.-B. Li, C.-F. Yang and S.-K. Tian, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 793 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) F.-Q. Yuan and F.-S. Han, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2013, 355, 537 CAS; (e) X. Xu, J. Liu, H. Li and Y. Li, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351, 2599 CrossRef CAS; (f) C. R. Reddy, G. Krishna, N. Kavitha, B. Latha and D.-S. Shin, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2012, 27, 5381 CrossRef; (g) C. R. Reddy, R. Ranjan, P. Kumaraswamy, M. D. Reddy and R. Gree, Curr. Org. Chem., 2014, 18, 2603 CrossRef CAS.
  7. (a) T. Kumar, M. S. Mobin and I. N. N. Namboothiri, Tetrahedron, 2013, 69, 4964 CrossRef CAS; (b) D. K. Nair, S. M. Mobin and I. N. N. Namboothiri, Tetrahedron Lett., 2012, 53, 3349 CrossRef CAS.
  8. D. Kundu, M. Samim, A. Majee and A. Hajra, Chem.–Asian J., 2011, 6, 406 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. (a) V. K. Rao, G. M. Shelke, R. Tiwari, K. Parang and A. Kumar, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 2190 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) A. Arcadi, S. Cacchi, M. Del Rosario, G. Fabrizi and F. Marinelli, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 9280 CrossRef CAS; (c) F. Colobert, A.-S. Castanet and O. Abillard, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2005, 3334 CrossRef CAS; (d) C. G. Bates, P. Saejueng, J. M. Murphy and D. Venkatarama, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 4727 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) R. C. Larock, E. K. Yum, M. J. Doty and K. K. C. Sham, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 3270 CrossRef CAS; (f) M. R. Kuram, M. Bhanuchandra and A. K. Sahoo, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 4607 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) S. Ye, G. Liu, S. Pu and J. Wu, Org. Lett., 2011, 14, 70 CrossRef PubMed; (h) M. J. Moure, R. SanMartin and E. Dominguez, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 3220 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (i) K. K. Park and J. Jeong, Tetrahedron, 2005, 61, 545 CrossRef CAS; (j) P. R. V. S. Lingam, D. H. Dahale, K. Mukkanti, B. Gopalan and A. Thomas, Tetrahedron Lett., 2012, 53, 5695 CrossRef; (k) N. Sakiyama, K. Noguchi and K. Tanaka, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 5976 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (l) K. C. Nicolaou, S. A. Snyder, A. Bigot and J. A. Pfefferkorn, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 1093 CrossRef CAS; (m) A. S. K. Hashmi, W. Yang and F. Rominger, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 5762 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (n) A. S. K. Hashmi, W. Yang and F. Rominger, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 6576 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. (a) S. Anwar, W.-Y. Huang, C.-H. Chen, Y.-S. Cheng and K. Chen, Chem.–Eur. J., 2013, 19, 4344 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) W.-Y. Huang, Y.-C. Chen and K. Chen, Chem.–Asian J., 2012, 7, 688 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. (a) C.-S. Gan, D.-D. Nan, J.-P. Qiao, C.-W. Wang and J.-N. Zhou, J. Nucl. Med., 2012, 53, 1620 Search PubMed; (b) C. L. Laura, D.-R. Suzana, E. Alba, A. C. José, M. Marie-Lise, V. Salvador and S. Javier, J. Med. Chem., 2012, 55, 9521 CrossRef PubMed.
  12. R. R. Jakob and H. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 3030 CrossRef PubMed.
  13. (a) R. J. Perrin, A. M. Fagan and D. M. Holtzman, Nature, 2009, 461, 916 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) F. M. LaFerla, K. N. Green and S. Oddo, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2007, 8, 499 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. A. K. Sharma, S. T. Pavlova, J. Kim, D. Finkelstein, N. J. Hawco, N. P. Rath, J. Kim and L. M. Mirica, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 6625 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. (a) S. S. Hindo, A. M. Mancino, J. J. Braymer, Y. H. Liu, S. Vivekanandan, A. Ramamoorthy and M. H. Lim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 16663 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) R. C. Rodríguez, M. Telpoukhovskaia and C. Orvig, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2012, 256, 2308 CrossRef.
  16. M. A. Matlin, G. Mehta, H. Hopf and A. Krief, Nat. Chem., 2015, 7, 941 CrossRef PubMed.
  17. (a) P. Anastas and N. Eghbali, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 301 RSC; (b) A. Chanda and V. V. Fokin, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 725 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. (a) S. Yaragorla, G. Singh, P. L. Saini and M. K. Reddy, Tetrahedron Lett., 2014, 55, 4657 CrossRef CAS; (b) S. Yaragorla, A. Pareek and R. Dada, Tetrahedron Lett., 2015, 56, 4770 CrossRef CAS; (c) S. Yaragorla, P. L. Saini and G. Singh, Tetrahedron Lett., 2015, 56, 1649 CrossRef CAS; (d) S. Yaragorla, G. Singh and R. Dada, Tetrahedron Lett., 2015, 56, 5924 CrossRef CAS; (e) S. Yaragorla, R. Dada and G. Singh, Synlett, 2016, 27, 912 CrossRef CAS; (f) S. Yaragorla, G. Singh and R. Dada, Tetrahedron Lett., 2016, 57, 591 CrossRef CAS.
  19. This condition was found to be the best during the synthesis of pyranofurans (ref. 1h) and hence we began with the same condition.
  20. When the reaction performed with 30 mol% Bu4NPF6, the yield was still 90% in 2.3 h.
  21. In case of 9a we could see the mixture of furan/pyran in 1/8 ratio in the crude mixture (by 1H NMR) but after isolation we could see trace of furan and in other cases we could not isolated the furan.
  22. Y. Li and W. Bao, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351, 865 CrossRef CAS.
  23. L.-Y. Wu, Y.-X. Xie, Z.-S. Chen, Y.-N. Niu and Y.-M. Liang, Synlett, 2009, 1453 CAS.
  24. α-Halo esters are widely used in the enolate chemistry and C–C cross coupling reactions. For examples see: (a) G. Darzens, C. R. Chim., 1904, 139, 1214 CAS; (b) G. Darzen, C. R. Chim., 1911, 151, 883 Search PubMed; (c) M. S. Newman and B. Magerlein, Org. React., 1949, 5, 413 CAS; (d) S. Reformatsky, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1887, 20, 1210 CrossRef; (e) A. Furstner, Synthesis, 1989, 571 CrossRef; (f) H. Takuo, G. Shaozhong and J. F. Hartwig, J. Org. Chem., 2013, 78, 8250 CrossRef PubMed.
  25. A. M. Chester, N. S. Mason, J. L. Brian and E. K. William, J. Nucl. Med., 2012, 53, 415 CrossRef PubMed.
  26. L. Marino, K. Pauwels, R. Casanovas, P. Sanchis, B. Vilanova, F. Munoz, J. Donoso and M. Adrover, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5, 12052 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. (a) A. K. Sharma, J. Kim, N. J. Hawco, N. P. Rath, J. Kim and L. M. Mirica, Inorg. Chem., 2014, 53, 11367 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) A. K. Sharma, S. T. Pavlova, J. Kim, D. Finkelstein, N. J. Hawco, N. P. Rath, J. Kim and L. M. J. Mirica, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 6625 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. D. Saman and R. Sandaroos, Org. Chem.: Indian J., 2014, 10, 115 Search PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ra17411f

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.