Jinzhu Wu*a,
Jun Daia,
Yanbin Shaob,
Meiqi Caoa and
Xiaohong Wu*a
aDepartment of Materials Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, 92 West Dazhi Street, Nan Gang District, Harbin 150001, People's Republic of China. E-mail: wujinzhu@hit.edu.cn; wuxiaohong@hit.edu.cn; Tel: +86-451-86413753
bThe Academy of Fundamental and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, 92 West Dazhi Street, Nan Gang District, Harbin 150001, People's Republic of China
First published on 8th August 2016
Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has emerged as a promising electrode material for supercapacitors. Elaboration of MoS2 with desired structures, morphologies and compositions as well as fabrication of MoS2-based hybrids are current research directions. Herein, we demonstrate engineering MoS2 with a multiphase structure including 2H and 1T phases as well as edge-rich nanospherical morphology via a hydrothermal route with the assistance of carbon dots (CDs) for the first time. The resultant MoS2 3D nanospheres are formed through the self-assembly of MoS2 2D nanosheets consisting of a few atomic layers stacked along the (002) direction with an enlarged interlayer spacing. The introduced CDs not only involve the growth of the few-layered multiphase MoS2 nanosheets but also mediate the formation of MoS2 nanospheres, whilst the residual CDs may intersperse onto the surfaces of MoS2 nanospheres. The novel MoS2 nanospheres-based electrode exhibits favorable electrochemical responses in an aqueous electrolyte, such as high specific capacitance (145 F g−1), good rate capability and excellent cyclic stability (90% capacity retention after 2000 cycles) owing to enhanced ionic intercalation and improved electrical conductivity associated with the specific structures and morphologies. This work would pave a new pathway through the structural, morphological and compositional design for improving the electrochemical properties of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) applicable as alternative energy storage materials.
Two-dimensional (2D) atomically-thick materials, exemplified by graphene and few-layered transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), have shown promise as new-generation energy materials.2–6 For instance, high volumetric specific capacitances of ∼300 F cm−3 have been obtained for restacked graphene nanosheets.3 Huang et al. reported that a layered MoSe2/graphene composite presents superior electrochemical performance as a supercapacitor electrode material.4
The bulk MoS2 is similar to graphite, in which one Mo layer is sandwiched between two S layers through strong covalent bonding while the resulting S–Mo–S trilayers are stacked by weak van der Waals forces. Due to its anisotropic structure, MoS2 is prone to form 2D morphology with large surface area and permeable channels for ions adsorption, intercalation and transportation especially in ultrathin forms.7,8 However, the poor intrinsic electrical conductivity of the bulk MoS2 associated with the indirect bandgap (1.2 eV) significantly limits its practical applications as an electrode material.7 To enhance the electrical conductivity, MoS2-based hybrids composing of conductive materials have been fabricated.9–14 Theoretical calculation can predict transition from indirect to direct bandgap when MoS2 becomes thin enough, rendering improved electrical conductivity from the pristine semiconductivity.15 Recent studies reveal that the single- and few-layered MoS2 nanosheets exhibit significantly improved electronic activity compared with the bulk MoS2, such as high charge-carrier mobility, tunable charge-carrier types and high on/off ratio.8,16 To prepare these ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets, several strategies have been developed.17
Generally, the bulk MoS2 possesses two polymorph structures of 2H phase and 1T phase depending on the arrangement of Mo and S atoms. In the 2H structure, Mo atom coordination is trigonal prismatic and the corresponding material is semiconductive. In the 1T structure, Mo atom coordination is octahedral offering the material a metal character. Most recently, the metallic 1T phase MoS2 was obtained from the semiconductive 2H phase MoS2,18 which is 107 times more conductive than the 2H counterpart. In addition, the minor 1T phase does not change the distributions of Mo atoms in the 2H phase MoS2 host and thus does not hamper its practical applications.
Carbon dots (CDs) are novel carbon nanomaterials and possess unique properties such as hydrophilicity, stability, low cytotoxicity, and photoluminescence.19 Recently, CDs have been used as stabilizers to facilitate the exfoliation of graphite to graphene in an aqueous medium.20 Herein, with the assistance of CDs, we successfully introduced the metallic 1T phase into the host of the few-layered 2H phase MoS2 in a simple one-pot hydrothermal route. Without further exfoliation and restack treatment, the obtained MoS2 nanostructures were directly used as an electrode for the supercapacitor and exhibit improved electrochemical characteristics, which can be ascribed to the synergistic contribution of the ultrathin 2D lamellar nanostructure with the expanded interlayer distance, edge-rich 3D nanospherical morphology, incorporation of the metallic 1T phase and semiconductive 2H phase, and the anchored CDs.
| (NH4)6Mo7O24(aq) + 3H2O(l) → 7MoO3(s) + 6NH3·H2O(l) | (1) |
| CS(NH2)2(aq) + 2H2O(l) → 2NH3(g) + H2S(g) + CO2(g) |
| CS(NH2)2(aq) + H2O(l) → CH3CONH2(l) + H2S(g) |
| 4MoO3(s) + 2H2S(g) → 4MoO2(s) + S(s) + SO2(g) + 2H2O(l) |
| MoO2(s) + 2H2S(g) → MoS2(s) + 2H2O(l) |
FE-SEM micrographs of different MoS2 were captured. The morphologies of the pure MoS2 demonstrate that it is disordered agglomerate built up with uneven MoS2 nanosheets randomly overlapped (Fig. 2(a)). In addition, these MoS2 nanosheets present obscure and rough edges, indicating insufficient crystallization (Fig. 2(b)). However, the as-prepared MoS2 with the assistance of CDs (10 mg) exhibits uniform flower-like nanospheric morphologies with dense stretching petal-like edges (Fig. 2(c)), which correspond to the ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets with the lateral sizes of ∼10 nm (Fig. 2(d)). EDS elemental maps of the latter MoS2 nanospheres were acquired (Fig. 2(e)–(g)). The calculated atomic ratio of Mo and S is 1
:
2.03, close to the theoretical stoichiometric ratio of a MoS2 molecule (1
:
2). According to the relatively sparse and uneven distribution of C compared with the full and homogeneous spread of Mo and S, we hypothesize that the introduced CDs probably play multiple roles in the synthesis of MoS2 nanospheres because of their unique structures and properties. CDs may not only involve the growth of the 2D MoS2 nanosheets but also tailor the construction of the 3D MoS2 nanospheres, or some may just be absorbed into MoS2 nanospheres.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 2 FE-SEM micrographs of MoS2 synthesized without CDs (a and b) and with 10 mg of CDs (c and d). EDS mapping images of the latter, showing C (e), Mo (f) and S (g). | ||
TEM image (Fig. 3(a)) of the as-prepared MoS2 in the presence of CDs (10 mg) clearly displays sponge-like nanostructures constructed by the ultrathin nanosheets, well consistent with the above FE-SEM observation. The incorporated CDs were distinguishable when observing under high magnification (Fig. 3(a) inset). HRTEM image (Fig. 3(b)) shows the clear lattice fringes of the lamellar MoS2 nanosheets with the interlayer spacing of 9.4 Å, well in accordance with the above XRD result. HRTEM observation also reveals that the current MoS2 nanosheets consist of few layers. Raman spectra further confirm that the most MoS2 nanosheets compose of about 4 layers (Fig. S2†). This is derived from the fact that the difference between representative E12g Raman shift at 381 cm−1 and A1g Raman shift at 405 cm−1 is close to that (24.3 cm−1) of the quadri-layered MoS2 nanosheets.22–24 It is well recognized that the difference between characteristic Raman shifts could be indicative of the layer numbers of the few-layered MoS2 nanosheets.22–24 Furthermore, the intensities of both E12g and A1g peaks were decreased with increasing CDs contents, which could be due to the reduced interlayer interactions and dielectric screening of long-range Coulomb forces with decrease of the layer numbers.25,26 SAED pattern (Fig. 3(c)) reveals the polycrystalline nature of the as-prepared MoS2 with CDs. Although CDs were not actually verified by XRD and Raman analysis owing to their tiny amount and small sizes, their existence and distribution were clearly verified by EDS elementary analysis and TEM microscopic observation.
Currently, there are two manipulative growth and evolution mechanisms of the crystalline nanoflowers: the initial structures are nanosheets as petals which curl and tangle to form nanoflowers, or the final nanoflowers are based on nuclei, followed by an outward growth of the petal-like nanosheets.27–29 To elucidate the effects of CDs on the evolution of MoS2 nanostructures, individual time-dependent synthesis of MoS2 in the presence or absence of CDs were carried out as shown in Fig. S3.† For the synthesis with CDs, after 1.5 h, MoS2 nanosheets were initially formed owing to the intrinsic anisotropic property of MoS2 (Fig. S3(a)†). After 2.0 h, more and more nanosheets were produced, tangling each other (Fig. S3(c)†). After 2.5 h, the flower-like MoS2 nanospheres with dense petals were constructed (Fig. S3(e)†). Comparatively, for the synthesis without CDs, after 1.5 h, amorphous clusters were firstly formed (Fig. S3(b)†). After 2.0 h, some MoS2 nanosheets with uneven dimensional and lateral sizes were obtained (Fig. S3(d)†). After 2.5 h, more and more nanosheets were produced, which randomly stack (Fig. S3(f)†). The above findings reveal that CDs effectively facilitate growth of 2D MoS2 nanosheets and construction of 3D MoS2 nanospheres within short synthetic time. A schematic evolution process of MoS2 obtained in the presence of CDs is thus proposed (Fig. 4). Initially, MoS2 prefers to grow into 2D nanosheets, in which the zero-dimensional CDs (ca. 2.5 nm in size) with high surface energy readily function as exogenous nuclei/seeds, besides the resultant MoS2 micelles as endogenous nuclei. Consequently, both synthetic energy and time are reduced. According to the sponge-like MoS2 nanostructures without a dense core (Fig. 3(a)), we suppose that the final 3D nanoflowers are assembled by the 2D nanosheets.30 Similar proposal for formation mechanism of Mo(SxSe1−x)2 nanoflowers has been reported.27 Moreover, the remaining CDs with high surface energy readily adhere on MoS2 nanospheres as observed by TEM (Fig. 3(a) inset).
In order to examine the chemical compositions and valence states of MoS2 nanospheres synthesized with CDs (10 mg), XPS analysis was performed (Fig. 5). From the survey spectrum (Fig. 5(a)), the elements of Mo, S, C and O are identified. The high-resolution scan of Mo 3d electrons depicts two major peaks arising from Mo4+ 3d5/2 and Mo4+ 3d3/2 orbitals located at 229.1 and 232.1 eV, respectively (Fig. 5(b)), suggesting the existence of the dominant 2H phase.31 Meanwhile, the 1T components with the binding energies of ∼0.8 eV lower than the 2H counterparts appear (Fig. 5(b)),16,32 together with a minor peak at 225.7 eV corresponding to S 2s of MoS2. Overall, the obtained MoS2 exclusively consists of the multiphase of the major 2H phase and minor 1T phase. It has been well known that the metallic 1T phase MoS2 is 107 times more electrically conductive than the semiconductive 2H phase MoS2.18 Therefore, the incorporation of the 1T phase into the 2H phase could be beneficial to the electrochemical performances of MoS2 as an electrode material. The S 2p XPS spectrum (Fig. 6(c)) shows typical S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2 doublet of S2−.7 All the XPS findings suggest the successful synthesis of the multiphase MoS2. Moreover, according to C 1s peak shape as shown in Fig. 5(d), the carbon atom may exist in different forms, including a major C–C bond centered at 284.5 eV and few oxidized C-containing bonds at the higher binding energies over 284.5 eV.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 5 XPS survey spectrum (a) and high-resolution XPS Mo 3d (b), S 2p (c) and C 1s spectra (d) of MoS2 obtained with the assistance of 10 mg of CDs. | ||
Nanostructures offering the advantages of large surface-to-volume ratio, favorable transport property, and high feasibility for volume change upon ion insertion/extraction and other reactions, show promising as potential electrode materials for next-generation supercapacitors.33 Fig. 6(a) compares the CV curves of different MoS2 obtained without CDs or with 10 mg of CDs at a low scan rate of 5 mV s−1 over a potential window of −0.65 to 0.35 V. Redox peaks are clearly distinguishable for the current MoS2 nanospheres instead of the pure MoS2, suggesting MoS2 nanospheres possess typical pseudocapacitive characteristics associated with the variable valences of Mo especially at the edges during the electrochemical processes.34 In addition, the more symmetric rectangular shape and larger integral area of the CV curves of MoS2 nanospheres in comparison to the pure MoS2 reveal that they have good typical electrostatic double-layer capacitive behavior with small contact resistance. The CV curves for MoS2 nanospheres at different scan rates were examined (Fig. 6(b)). It could be found that all the CV curves retain similar rectangular shapes within the experimental scan rates, indicating MoS2 nanospheres possess high rate capability and ideal supercapacitor behavior.
Fig. 6(c) displays the GCD curves of MoS2 nanospheres with different current densities. The symmetric triangular-shape charge/discharge circles especially at high current densities further confirm the ideal supercapacitive characteristics and superior reversible redox property, which is in good agreement with the above CV curves. Accordingly, the gravimetric specific capacitance was then calculated and plotted (Fig. 6(d)) using the discharge portion of the individual GCD profiles. At 0.5 A g−1, MoS2 nanospheres deliver a high gravimetric specific capacitance of 145 F g−1, which is larger than that (120 F g−1) of the pure MoS2 and comparable to 148 F g−1 for a MoS2–graphene hybrid.7 With increase of the current density to 8 A g−1, MoS2 nanospheres can preserve about 50% specific capacitance, which further confirms the high rate capability and is comparable to other ideal electrostatic double-layer capacitive.33,35 The good rate capability and high specific capacitance can be ascribed to the high specific surface area (18.08 m2 g−1) associated with the flower-like and edge-rich morphology as well as improved electrical conductivity of MoS2 nanospheres due to the incorporated metallic 1T phase.
MoS2 nanospheres exhibit excellent cyclic stability in comparison to the pure MoS2; giving about 90% capacity retention after 2000 charge/discharge cycles (Fig. 6(e)). The remarkable cycling stability and desirable reversible capacity of the current MoS2 nanospheres are comparable to the reported MoS2-based hybrids with excellent electrochemical performances.4–6,36 The underlying reason can be attributed to the synergistic effects of the special 2D microstructure with enlarged lattice spacing and few layer numbers allowing more efficient ions intercalation and transportation,37 unique 3D morphologies with more edges enabling the reversible electrochemical reactions, and 1T phase incorporation enhancing the electrical conductivity.
Fig. 6(f) and inset (up) compare Nyquist plots of the pure MoS2 and MoS2 nanospheres. It can be seen that both Nyquist plots consist of a semicircle arc at high frequencies and straight lines at medium and low frequencies. Compared with the pure MoS2, MoS2 nanospheres demonstrate a slightly reduced semicircle at the high frequencies, which can be an indicator for the enhanced kinetics of the electrode reaction (Fig. 6(f) inset (up)). Furthermore, the angle of the straight line at the low frequencies for MoS2 nanospheres is 75° in comparison to 60° for the pure MoS2, close to ideal supercapacitor (phase angle is about 90°), further suggesting MoS2 nanospheres possess typical supercapacitive behavior. The corresponding equivalent electric circuit was established (Fig. 6(f) inset (down)). Here, R1 represents liquid phase resistance, Rct and Zw correspond to the charge transfer resistance at the electrolyte/electrolyte interface and solid-state diffusion resistance, while Cd denotes double-layer capacitance. According to the diameter of the semicircle arc, the Rct value for MoS2 nanospheres is about 15 Ω. The small Rct value means the good electrical conductivity and low resistance of the electrode material. Overall, all the electrochemical measurements reveal that the current MoS2 nanospheres possess the excellent structural stability and efficient electronic/ionic transportation capacity, and in return, high storage capacities and stable cycling life.
To further clarify the reason behind the electrochemical performances of different MoS2, textural properties were investigated. N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms and Barrette Joynere Halenda (BJH) cumulative pore-size distributions of different MoS2 obtained without or with CDs (10 mg) are displayed in Fig. S4(a) and (b),† respectively. Both samples present type IV isotherms according to IUPAC nomenclature (Fig. S4(a)†), indicating the existence of micropores and/or mesopores. The hysteresis loop of MoS2 nanospheres shifts to the lower pressure region compared with the pure MoS2, suggesting the presence of relatively more small pores. The pore size distribution curves as shown in Fig. S4(b)† are well consistent with the above isothermal behavior. As can be seen, the pure MoS2 mainly has mesopores of 2.8 nm pore size, while MoS2 nanospheres are of complicated pore structures including different mesopores (2.2, 3.5 nm and the larger sizes). In addition, MoS2 nanospheres possess the larger surface area (18.08 m2 g−1) than the pure MoS2 (16.06 m2 g−1). The larger surface area and complicated pore structure of MoS2 nanospheres associated with the specific morphologies and multiphase structure can be beneficial for the improved electrochemical performances.
Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ra15074h |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |