Pengfei Houabc,
Jinbin Wang*abc,
Xiangli Zhong*abc,
Yuan Zhangabc,
Xiong Zhangabc,
Congbing Tanabc and
Bo Liabc
aSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, Hunan, China. E-mail: jbwang@xtu.edu.cn; xlzhong@xtu.edu.cn; Fax: +86-731-58298119; Tel: +86-731-58293030
bHunan Provincial National Defense Key Laboratory of Key Film Materials & Application for Equipment, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, Hunan, China
cKey Laboratory of Low-dimensional Materials and Application Technology, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, Hunan, China
First published on 9th August 2016
Multilevel data ferroelectric storage memory is a breakthrough for addressing low density in ferroelectric random access memories. However, the application of the multilevel data ferroelectric storage memory is limited by high cost and difficulty to prepare high quality epitaxial films. Herein, we create a multilevel data ferroelectric storage memory with a non-epitaxial ferroelectric ultrathin film to overcome these issues. Through controlling the polarization switching and oxygen vacancy migration with the voltage pulses, we demonstrated that voltage-controlled barrier heights yield a memristive behavior with resistance variations. Moreover, we achieved eight logic states, which are written and read easily. Our results suggest new opportunities for ferroelectrics as high density non-volatile memories.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 Schematic of the device. The diameter of the Pt dot is about 100 μm. As doped Si substrate acts as the bottom electrode. |
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 (a) XRD patterns of PZT/SiOx/Si heterostructures and Si substrate at various 2θ. (b) (212) peak shift of XRD spectra. The thicknesses of the PZT films are about 2 nm and 30 nm. |
The lowest resistance state (LRS) and highest resistance state (HRS) of the Pt/PZT/SiOx/Si cell were written at 5 V and −5 V, respectively. In order to insure the exactitude of the test, the read voltage was swept from 0 V to positive voltage or negative voltage. As shown in Fig. 5, we can read LRS from 0 V to 3 V (blue line) and clearly see the step changes when the negative voltage sweeping is from 0 V to −3 V (red line). Moreover, we can read HRS from 0 V to −3 V (black line) and clearly see the step changes when the positive voltage sweeping is from 0 V to 3 V (purple line). As shown in the inset figure in Fig. 5, the voltage was swept in a sequence of 0 V → 5 V → 0 V → −5 V → 0 V (in logs). The ratio of HRS and LRS is about 3 to 4 orders, which is much higher when compared with the results of the devices with many epitaxial films previously reported.6,10,14 From the inset figure in Fig. 5, we can clearly see the step changes when the negative (positive) voltage sweeping is applied. These steps show the potential of multilevel data storage on a Pt/PZT/SiOx/Si device, and the device may get different RSs by different write processes. However, these step changes do not show all the RSs clearly. In order to investigate all the RSs that the device can achieve, we tested the sample by the processes shown in Fig. 6(a) and (b). In Fig. 6(a) and (b), it shows that a SET (RESET) voltage pulse is required before every write voltage pulse (i.e., before a write voltage pulse of 4 V is applied, a −5 V SET voltage pulse should be applied first). A SET (RESET) voltage pulse is applied to erase the former resistance state of the Pt/PZT/SiOx/Si device, and then voltage pulses with the opposite direction to the SET (RESET) voltage pulse are applied to obtain different RSs.
![]() | ||
Fig. 6 (a) and (b) The test process. Red lines and purple lines represent the SET/RESET processes and WRITE processes. Black lines represent the delay. Green lines represent the READ processes. |
In the processes in Fig. 6(a), the SET voltage is 5 V, and the read process is a voltage pulse or a voltage sweeping. When the resistance of the device is at its lowest, a negative voltage pulse above −1.5 V can switch the resistance state to a higher resistance state. It can be seen that higher negative writing voltage pulses can result in lower current values (or equivalently, the higher resistance states). After the test with the write voltage pulses of −2 V, −3 V, −3.5 V, −4 V, −4.5 V and −5 V, five RSs were achieved. In the processes in Fig. 6(b), the RESET voltage is −5 V. Similar to the former processes, positive voltage pulses can switch the HRS to lower resistance states. After written by voltage pulses of 2 V, 3 V, 3.5 V, 4 V, 4.5 V and 5 V, five RSs were achieved. However, two RSs were the same as two of the former five RSs (LRS and HRS in the two processes are the same). 8 RSs were achieved finally, and the 8 RSs are read by voltage sweepings of 0 V → −2 V or 0 V → 2 V, as shown in Fig. 7. Obviously, more than 8 voltage values can be used to write the RSs. However, considering the application of the device, the different RSs should be distinguished clearly in the read processes. If the ratio of HRS and LRS is much higher, we may obtain more RSs that can be distinguished clearly in the read processes. Fig. 8 shows that the ROFF/RON is as a function of the writing voltage pulse amplitude for the 2 nm thick PZT junction (the RSs are all read with 1 V voltage pulses). The ROFF (resistance of ‘0’ state) value is constant, and only the RON value varies with the writing voltage.
The tunable and non-volatile nature of electrical resistance of the Pt/PZT/SiOx/Si heterostructure allows us to treat it as a memristor. Although the device has a similar structure to ferroelectric tunnel junctions (FTJs), it is different with common FTJs because of the SiOx layer. When a high voltage of 5 V is applied, it would elevate the field close to ∼0.8 V nm−1; therefore, the switchable polarization of PZT may not be the only reason causing the multi-level storage. Furthermore, the resistive switching of the device is from an insulating state to an almost metallic state, and then back to the insulating state in the effect of the voltage. Therefore, some different things may happen in the resistive switching behavior of the PZT and SiOx layers. The SiOx layer is formed in the preparation of the PZT layer; therefore, many oxygen vacancies are formed in the SiOx layer because of oxygen diffusion during the deposition. Like the resistive switching behaviors in SrTiO3 and TiO2, the oxygen vacancies may be important in our device.17–19 A possible mechanism is shown in Fig. 9. When a high voltage pulse of −5 V is applied on the device, the polarization of PZT film points to SiOx, and most oxygen vacancies are in the SiOx layer; therefore, the device is at ‘0’ state. Then, a positive 2 V is applied to the device, the polarization of PZT film points Pt, and some oxygen vacancies move to the interfaces of PZT and SiOx layers, causing a decrease in the barrier height and large leakage current. When a much higher positive voltage is applied on the device, the polarization value is much larger (as shown in Fig. 3(a)). However, the oxygen vacancies may move into the PZT film, causing a decrease in the PZT barrier height. In the effect of a 5 V voltage pulse, the polarization value may be the highest, but the oxygen vacancies may lead the PZT film to be at an almost metallic state. When a negative 2 V pulse is applied to the device, the oxygen vacancies may move back a little and the polarization will point to SiOx. When the applied negative voltage is increased, the barrier height is also increased. When a −5 V pulse is applied on the device, it will revert back to the ‘0’ state. Obviously, the reverse voltage of PZT polarization is above 1 V in our case (as shown in Fig. 3); therefore, the RSs are stable at 1 V. In order to prove the oxygen vacancy migration in the device, we show a Pt/SrTiO3/SiOx/Si device with a thin non-ferroelectric SrTiO3 film (which is prepared in the same condition with PZT film) in the ESI.† The device can achieve two RSs because of oxygen vacancy migration. A PFM image for each stage in Fig. 9 is also shown in the ESI,† in order to verify the polarization direction and confirm the validity of the proposed mechanism.
![]() | ||
Fig. 9 A possible mechanism of the multi-level storage. Schematic of the energy barrier diagrams for the OFF and ON states as a function on the external electric field E. |
An important factor is that the write processes of many multilevel data ferroelectric storage memories previously reported are sensitive to write time at constant voltage values.6–9 Devices with epitaxial films are written using CAFM or PFM through controlling the write time at a certain voltage to control the ratio of different domains orientations. However, less sensitivity in the write time may mean a much higher reliability in the application of the device with respect to the numerous read processes. In our test, when the read voltage sweeping was swept from 0 V to 2 V (−2 V), though we took 103 values by every 2 mV, the RSs were almost unchanged. Furthermore, we only changed the write voltage values in the write processes regardless of the write time. Therefore, the device in our work is much more sensitive to the write voltage value than the write time. In the multilevel data ferroelectric storage memories of domain walls system, the conductivity is mainly caused by the domain walls. Domain wall conductance is a dynamic process that is intrinsically linked to slow polarization dynamics or slow ionic processes such as carrier vacancy segregation processes.6–9 Domain wall acts as an adjustable resistance in the multilevel data ferroelectric storage memory of domain system, while the barrier height mainly acts as the adjustable resistance in our device. Although the two systems have the phenomenon of the multilevel storage, the electrical conduction mechanisms are unalike. Tunnel current is the main role in the 2 nm PZT system with little effect in the domain walls system.
Retention is an important issue for the non-volatile memory cells. We wrote the 8 states as shown in Fig. 6(a) and (b), and read all the states at 1 V to test the retention and to test if the 8 states can be distinguished clearly in the read processes. In 100 s, the RSs are very stable, as shown in Fig. 10(a). 0 (HRS), 1, 3 and 5 states were written at −5 V, −3.5 V, −3 V and −2 V (each write voltage was applied after a 5 V SET process) and 2, 4, 6 and 7 (LRS) states were written at 2 V, 4 V, 4.5 V and 5 V (each write voltage was applied after a −5 V RESET process). Each RS is repetitively written about 30 times, as shown in Fig. 10(b). Most of the RSs can be distinguished clearly at the read voltage of 1 V.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ra14388a |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |