A highly active and recyclable homogeneous NHC–palladium catalyst with pH- and light-sensitive tags for the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions of aryl halides with arylboronic acids

Guiyan Liu*a, Chengxin Liua, Xia Zhaoa and Jianhui Wang*b
aTianjin Key Laboratory of Structure and Performance for Functional Molecules, Key Laboratory of Inorganic–Organic Hybrid Functional Material Chemistry, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300387, P. R. China. E-mail: guiyanliu2013@163.com
bDepartment of Chemistry, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, P. R. China. E-mail: wjh@tju.edu.cn

Received 31st March 2016 , Accepted 27th April 2016

First published on 29th April 2016


Abstract

The design and synthesis of a stable, highly active, and recyclable homogeneous palladium catalyst for Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions is of great interest. A well-defined N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) Pd(II) complex with pH- and light-sensitive nitrobenzospiropyran (SP) tags has been synthesized in good yields via a series of simple steps. This complex is a homogeneous catalyst which has excellent reactivities for the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of aryl bromides and aryl chlorides with arylboronic acids. Significantly, at a low loading (0.2 mol%), this catalyst has very good recyclability in an i-PrOH–H2O solvent system (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 v/v), under mild conditions. By making use of the pH- and light-sensitive SP tags, the catalyst can be recovered and reused seven times.


Both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis play essential roles in organic chemistry. Heterogeneous catalysts are usually more stable and are easier to separate from the reaction products,1,2 whereas, homogeneous catalysts are more active and have better selectivities. The main disadvantage of homogenous catalysts is that they are difficult to isolate and reuse.3,4 From economic and ecological standpoints, catalyst recovery and reuse is imperative and the separation and recycling of homogeneous catalysts is currently a main objective in the area of green chemistry.5

The palladium-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reaction of aryl halides with arylboronic acids is one of the most powerful tools to construct C–C bonds and is widely used to make biaryl derivatives which are important intermediates in the syntheses of natural products, pharmaceuticals, and other materials.6,7 Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions generally proceed well in homogeneous Pd/ligand catalytic systems. Phosphine ligands are commonly employed in Pd/ligand catalytic systems in order to promote the efficiencies of coupling reactions.8–11 However, most phosphine ligands are costly, sensitive to air, and degrade at high temperature. Additionally, it is difficult to remove the decomposed phosphine ligands from the reaction products. These issues limit the application of phosphine ligands to industrial processes.

Bulky N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) are often used as σ-donor ligands in metal coordination chemistry. They have excellent stability and high dissociation energies.12 Due to their steric and electronic properties, NHCs can effectively enhance the catalytic activity and stability of palladium catalysts.13,14 Over the past few years, the use of NHCs as supporting ligands in palladium catalysts has become increasingly popular.15 NHC–Pd(II) complexes with a 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 ratio of NHC ligand to Pd, especially those having one dominant NHC ligand, two anionic ligands, and/or other neutral ligands have been found to be very active.16–18 However, these homogeneous catalysts cannot be reused well. In this work, an effective and recyclable NHC ligand/Pd catalyst with a 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 ratio has been developed for the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of aryl halides with arylboronic acids.

In previous studies, we reported a highly efficient and recyclable homogeneous Ru olefin metathesis catalyst containing nitrobenzospiropyran (SP).19 These SP tags have photochromic properties and this property was used to separate this homogeneous catalyst from the reaction products. Using this same method, Zhang et al. were able to recover a NHC–copper(I) complex.20 Spiropyrans are not only light-sensitive but also pH-sensitive and so in this work, both the pH- and light-sensitive properties of a SP-tagged NHC–Pd(II) complex were investigated in order to develop a method to recover homogeneous catalysts.

Scheme 1 illustrates the synthetic route for the SP tagged NHC–Pd(II) complex 6. The SP tagged ligand 5 was synthesized in moderate to good yields using 4-bromo-2,6-dimethyl-phenylamine as the starting material. The 4-bromo-2,6-dimethyl-phenylamine was treated with glyoxal at room temperature to give N,N′-bis(4-bromo-2,6-dimethylphenyl)imine, which was subsequently refluxed with sodium borohydride to generate 1. Refluxing of 1 with ethyl acrylate in toluene in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 and triethylamine (TEA) gave 2, which when heated with NaOH(aq) generated 3. When 3 was stirred with SP, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) in CH2Cl2 in the dark at 30 °C, 4 was formed. Next, 5 was prepared by reacting commercially available 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzaldehyde with 4 in the presence of acetic acid.21 The target complex 6 was formed as a royal purple solid after refluxing 5 with (Pd(allyl)Cl)2.


image file: c6ra08272f-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Synthesis of SP-tagged NHC–palladium complex 6. Reagents and conditions: (i) glyoxal, MeOH, stirred; (ii) NaBH4, reflux; (iii) ethyl acrylate, Pd(PPh3)4, toluene, reflux; (iv) NaOH (aq), MeOH, reflux; (v) SP, DCC, DMAP; (vi) 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzaldehyde, acetic acid, CH2Cl2; (vii) (Pd(allyl)Cl)2, toluene, 80 °C, stirred.

In order to determine if the SP-functionalized NHC–Pd(II) complex 6, has both pH- and light-switching properties, UV-adsorption experiments were performed. Fig. 1 shows the three states in which this system exists as a function of light and pH. The UV-vis spectrum of 6 in i-PrOH–H2O (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 v/v) has no absorption bands from 400–800 nm (black line). However, when the pH of the solution was adjusted to 12 with KOH and the complex was irradiated with 365 nm light, a band with λmax at 420 nm appeared (red line). According to Boyd et al. this indicates that complex 8a (or 8b) was formed.22 At the same time, the complex 8 was also characterized by 1H NMR and the results showed that it's a mixture of 8a and 8b (see ESI). When the pH of the solution was adjusted to neutral, the λmax of the absorption band shifted to 520 nm (blue line) which indicates that complex 7 was formed.22 When complex 7 was irradiated with light (λ > 380 nm) for two minutes, it was converted back into complex 6 as indicated by the disappearance of the absorption band at 520 nm (green line).23


image file: c6ra08272f-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Structures and Vis-UV spectra of complex 6 as a function of pH and light in i-PrOH–H2O (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 v/v). Black line – irradiation of 6 produces no significant absorbance from 450–650 nm regions. Red line – addition of KOH caused the formation of 8 with an absorbance band at 420 nm. Blue line – neutralization with HCl generated 7 with an absorbance band at 520 nm. Green line – irradiation of complex 7 with light (λ > 380 nm) for two minutes caused complex 7 to convert back into complex 6.

Next, the catalytic activity of 6 for the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of 4-bromotoluene with phenylboronic acid was investigated. In order to optimize the reaction conditions, KOH and K2CO3 in combination with different solvents were investigated using 4-bromotoluene (0.25 mmol), phenylboronic acid (0.25 mmol) and catalyst 6 (0.1 mol%) as a model reaction system. The effect of the solvent was investigated first. The best result (99% yield) was obtained in i-PrOH–H2O (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 v/v) in the present of KOH after reacting for 3.5 h at 30 °C. Methanol and methanol/water (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 v/v) both gave moderate yields (67% and 55% respectively). When other solvents (DMF/H2O (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 v/v), THF/H2O (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 v/v), i-PrOH, DMF, THF, toluene, or H2O) were employed, no products were obtained. The base also had a pronounced effect on the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of the deactivated aryl bromide and KOH was the most effective with a yield of 99%. The use of K2CO3 resulted in a lower yield (48%) due to its weak basicity. The results for the different solvents and bases are presented in Table S1 (see ESI).

Using these optimized conditions, the activity of 6 for Suzuki–Miyaura reactions of various aryl halides with phenylboronic acid was then tested. The results are shown in Table 1. The Suzuki–Miyaura reactions of deactivated aryl halides including 4-iodotoluene, 4-bromotoluene, chlorobenzene, 4-chlorotoluene, p-chlorofluorobenzene and a hindered 2-methylbromobenzene all proceeded with high yields (99%, 99%, 92%, 78%, 90% and 94%, respectively) (entries 1–6). However, the reactions of 4-nitrobromobenzene, 4-bromobenzaldehyde and 2-bromopyridine had lower yields of 20%, 42% and 30%, respectively (entries 7–9) due to their poor solubilities in i-PrOH–H2O (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 v/v). The catalyst system is homogeneous and a clear picture about it is shown in Fig. S1 (see ESI).

Table 1 Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of aryl halides with phenylboronic acida

image file: c6ra08272f-u1.tif

Entry X–R Product Yieldb (%) Entry X–R Product Yieldb (%)
a Reactions were carried out using 10a (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv.), 9 (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv.), KOH (0.5 mmol, 2 equiv.), H2O (0.5 mL) and i-PrOH (0.5 mL) at 30 °C, for 3.5 h.b Isolated yields.c 1.25 h.
1 image file: c6ra08272f-u2.tif 11a 99c 6 image file: c6ra08272f-u3.tif 11d 94
2 image file: c6ra08272f-u4.tif 11a 99 7 image file: c6ra08272f-u5.tif 11e 42
3 image file: c6ra08272f-u6.tif 11b 92 8 image file: c6ra08272f-u7.tif 11f 30
4 image file: c6ra08272f-u8.tif 11a 78 9 image file: c6ra08272f-u9.tif 11g 20
5 image file: c6ra08272f-u10.tif 11c 90        


Next, a variety of electron-rich and electron-poor arylboronic acids were tested under the optimized reaction conditions and the results are shown in Table 2. In most cases, the corresponding biaryls were achieved in high to excellent yields. However, furan-3-boronic acid, a heteroaryl boronic acid, gave unsatisfactory results (entry 8).

Table 2 Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of 4-bromotoluene with boronic acids derivativesa

image file: c6ra08272f-u11.tif

Entry R–B(OH)2 Product Yieldb (%) Entry R–B(OH)2 Product Yieldb (%)
a Reactions were carried out using 10 (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv.), 9a (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv.), KOH (0.5 mmol, 2 equiv.), H2O (0.5 mL) and i-PrOH (0.5 mL) at 30 °C, for 3.5 h.b Isolated yields.
1 image file: c6ra08272f-u12.tif 12a 98 5 image file: c6ra08272f-u13.tif 12e 58
2 image file: c6ra08272f-u14.tif 12b 95 6 image file: c6ra08272f-u15.tif 12f 80
3 image file: c6ra08272f-u16.tif 12c 95 7 image file: c6ra08272f-u17.tif 12g 63
4 image file: c6ra08272f-u18.tif 12d 93 8 image file: c6ra08272f-u19.tif 12h 20


A plausible mechanism for the formation of 11 (or 12) is illustrated in Scheme 2. First, an active [(NHC)Pd(0)] specie A was generated through a nucleophilic attack of OH on the allyl moiety followed by reductive elimination.24 The second step involve the generation of intermediate species B in the presence of the aryl halide.25 Then, intermediate C was formed in the presence of phenylboronic acid. Lastly, the coupling product was formed followed by a reductive elimination reaction.


image file: c6ra08272f-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Proposed activation pathways for Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions of aryl halides with arylboronic acids.

Finally, the pH- and light-sensitive properties of the SP-tagged NHC–Pd(II) complex 6 were utilized in order to recover and reuse the catalyst. After 4-bromotoluene was reacted with phenylboronic acid under the optimal reaction conditions, complex 6 was easily recovered from the products by using the simple recovery process shown in Fig. 2. After the reaction, cyclohexane was added to the i-PrOH–H2O (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 v/v) product mixture resulting in the formation of two layers. The products dissolved in the upper layer (the cyclohexane and i-PrOH) and complex 8 stayed in the lower layer (the water). The product-layer was then removed. Next, the lower layer was neutralized with HCl and then CH2Cl2 was added, again resulting in the formation of two layers. Complex 7 dissolved in the CH2Cl2 layer. The catalyst-containing CH2Cl2 layer was then irradiated with UV to transform the trans-MC tag into the SP tag. Finally the solvent was removed under vacuum and the recycled catalyst, complex 6, was obtained. Complex 6 was then directly used for another reaction cycle. As shown in Table 3, with a low loading (0.2 mol%), the recovered catalyst exhibited high catalytic activity. Although a small amount of deposits of Pd black accompanied this reaction which resulted in a prolonging in reaction time, the recovered catalyst still retained activity for seven successive cycles. A high turnover number (total TON = 3705) was obtained.


image file: c6ra08272f-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Schematic for the separation of catalyst 6 from the products.
Table 3 Recycling of 6 for the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of 4-bromotoluene with PhB(OH)2a

image file: c6ra08272f-u20.tif

Cycleb (% yield)
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 TONi
a Reactions were carried out using 4-bromotoluene (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv.), PhB(OH)2 (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv.), KOH (0.5 mmol, 2 equiv.), H2O (0.5 mL) and i-PrOH (0.5 mL) at 30 °C.b Isolated yields.c Reaction time: 1.5 h.d Reaction time: 2.5 h.e Reaction time: 3.0 h.f Reaction time: 12 h.g Reaction time: 1.5.h By ICP-AES analysis based on Pd%.i Total TON.
  98c 98c 98c 98c 98d (62g) 98e (55g) 97f (30g) 56f (15g) 3705
Recoveredh catalyst (mol%) 0.194 0.186 0.177 0.164 0.156 0.145 0.130    


In conclusion, a highly efficient and recyclable homogeneous catalystic system for Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions of aryl halides with arylboronic acids has been developed. The catalyst is a NHC–palladium(II) complex with pH- and light-sensitive SP tags. The catalyst is stable and has high catalytic activities under mild reaction conditions. By using the pH and light-sensitive properties of the SP tags, the homogeneous catalyst at a low loading (0.2 mol%) can be recovered and reused seven times. This new method of recycling and recovering a homogeneous catalyst could be an important tool for developing highly active recyclable homogeneous palladium catalysts for C–C coupling or other palladium-catalyzed reactions.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 21102102, 21572158 and 21572155).

Notes and references

  1. G. Ertl, H. Knözinger, F. Schüth and J. Weitkamp, Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, VCH, Weinheim, 2008 Search PubMed.
  2. D. Wang, C. Deraedt, J. Ruiz and D. Astruc, Acc. Chem. Res., 2015, 48, 1871 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. A. Herrmann and B. Cornils, Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds, Wiley, Weinheim, 1996 Search PubMed.
  4. D. Astruc, Organometallic Chemistry and Catalysis, Springer, Berlin, 2007 Search PubMed.
  5. Review: D. J. Cole-Hamilton, Science, 2003, 299, 1702 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. For reviews, see: (a) N. Miyaura and A. Suzuki, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 2457 CrossRef CAS; (b) R. Martin and S. L. Buchwald, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1461 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) M. Mondal and U. Bora, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 873 RSC; (d) J. Magano and J. R. Dunetz, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 2177 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. For examples, see: (a) K. T. Wong, T. S. Huang, Y. Lin, C. C. Wu, G. H. Lee, S. M. Peng, C. H. Chou and Y. O. Su, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 513 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) G. Zhang, Y. Luan, X. Han, Y. Wang, X. Wen and C. Ding, Appl. Organomet. Chem., 2014, 28, 332 CrossRef CAS; (c) S. Santra, P. K. Hota, R. Bhattacharyya, P. Bera, P. Ghosh and S. K. Mandal, ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 2776 CrossRef CAS.
  8. (a) W. A. Herrmann and C. Kocher, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 2163 Search PubMed; (b) C. W. K. Gstöttmayr, V. P. M. Bohn, E. Herdtweck, M. Grosche and W. A. Herrmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1363 CrossRef; (c) J. P. Stambuli, R. Kuwano and J. F. Hartwig, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 4746 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) C. A. Fleckenstein and H. Plenio, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 3236 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. (a) J. P. Wolfe, R. A. Singer and B. H. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 9550 CrossRef CAS; (b) A. Zapf, A. Ehrentraut and M. Beller, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 4153 CrossRef CAS; (c) M. R. Netherton, C. Dai, K. Neuschutz and G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 10099 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) A. Suzuki, Chem. Commun., 2005, 38, 4759 RSC; (e) N. T. S. Phan, M. V. D. Sluys and C. W. Jones, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2006, 348, 609 CrossRef CAS; (f) A. N. Marziale, S. H. Faul, T. Reiner, S. Schneider and J. Eppinger, Green Chem., 2010, 12, 35 RSC.
  10. (a) J. Yin and S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 12051 CrossRef CAS; (b) J. Yin, M. P. Rainka, X. X. Zhang and S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 1162 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) K. Billingsley and S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 3358 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) R. Martin and S. L. Buchwald, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1461 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) K. Dooleweerdt, B. P. Fors and S. L. Buchwald, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 2350 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. (a) A. F. Littke and G. C. Fu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 3387 CrossRef CAS; (b) G. C. Fu, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1555 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) T. Hoshi, I. Saitoh, T. Nakazawa, T. Suzuki, J. I. Sakai and H. Hagiwara, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 4013 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) A. J. DeAngelis, P. G. Gildner, R. Chow and T. J. Colacot, J. Org. Chem., 2015, 80, 6794 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. (a) W. A. Herrmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1290 CrossRef CAS; (b) J. H. Kim, J. W. Kim, M. Shokouhimehr and Y. S. Lee, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 6714 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) J. W. Kim, J. H. Kim, D. H Lee and Y. S. Lee, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47, 4745 CrossRef CAS.
  13. (a) Y. Uozumi, H. Tanaka and K. Shibatomi, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 281 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) Y. Uozumi and Y. Nakai, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 2997 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) Y. Uozumi, H. Danjo and T. Hayashi, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 3384 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. S. D. Walker, T. E. Barder, J. R. Martinelli and S. L. Buchwald, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 1871 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. (a) N. Marion and S. P. Nolan, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1440 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) T. Tu, X. Feng, Z. Wang and X. Liu, Dalton Trans., 2010, 39, 10598 RSC.
  16. (a) N. Marion, P. de Fremont, I. M. Puijk, E. C. Ecarnot, D. Amoroso, A. Bell and S. P. Nolan, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2007, 349, 2380 CrossRef CAS; (b) N. Marion, O. Navarro, J. Mei, E. D. Stevens, N. M. Scott and S. P. Nolan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 4101 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) Z. Jin, S. X. Guo, X. P. Gu, L. L. Qiu, H. B. Song and J. X. Fang, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351, 1575 CrossRef CAS; (d) D. H. Lee, J. H. Kim, B. H. Jun, H. Kang, J. Park and Y. S. Lee, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 1609 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. (a) J. Broggi, H. Clavier and S. P. Nolan, Organometallics, 2008, 27, 5525 CrossRef CAS; (b) O. Navarro, R. A. Kelly III and S. P. Nolan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 16194 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) T. Tu, Z. Sun, W. Fang, M. Xu and Y. Zhou, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 4250 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. D. R. Jensen, M. J. Schultz, J. A. Mueller and M. S. Sigman, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3810 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. G. Liu and J. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 4425 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. G. D. Zhang, R. Lang, W. L. Wang, H. Lv, L. Y. Zhao, C. Xia and F. W. Li, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2015, 357, 917 CrossRef CAS.
  21. G. W. Nyce, S. Csihony, R. M. Waymouth and J. L. Hedrick, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10, 4073 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. A. R. Boyd, P. G. Jessop, J. M. Dust and E. Buncel, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 6047 CAS.
  23. Y. Sheng, J. Leszczynski, A. A. Garcia, R. Rosario, D. Gust and J. Springer, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 16233 CrossRef CAS.
  24. (a) M. S. Viciu, O. Navarro, R. F. Germaneau, R. A. Kelly III, W. Sommer, N. Marion, E. D. Stevens, L. Cavallo and S. P. Nolan, Organometallics, 2004, 23, 1629 CrossRef CAS; (b) N. Marion, O. Navarro, J. Mei, E. D. Stevens, N. M. Scott and S. P. Nolan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 4101 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. S. D. Yang, C. L. Sun, Z. Fang, B. J. Li, Y. Z. Li and Z. J. Shi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 1473 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Full experimental details and characterization data (1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, 19F-NMR, HRMS and elemental analysis). See DOI: 10.1039/c6ra08272f

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.