A practical green chemistry approach to synthesize fused bicyclic 4H-pyranes via an amine catalysed 1,4-addition and cyclization cascade

Jun-Long Lia, Qiang Li*a, Kai-Chuan Yangac, Yi Lia, Liang Zhoua, Bo Hanb, Cheng Peng*b and Xiao-Jun Gou*a
aAntibiotics Research and Re-evaluation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Industrial Institute of Antibiotics, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610052, PR China. E-mail: liqiang@cdu.edu.cn; gouxj@163.com
bState Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Systematic Research, Development and Utilization of Chinese Medicine Resources, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China. E-mail: pengcheng@cdutcm.edu.cn
cChengdu Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China

Received 10th March 2016 , Accepted 11th April 2016

First published on 12th April 2016


Abstract

A newly developed synthetic approach to densely functionalized 4H-pyrane derivatives via an amine catalysed cascade reaction is presented. This protocol is relatively environmentally benign because it proceeds smoothly in water or ethanol at ambient temperature with low catalyst loading; more importantly, the products are easily purified, and some show promising antibacterial activity.


Synthetic chemistry has made incredible advances in the past decades, yet achieving “ideal syntheses” still remains a challenging and urgent task.1 Of particular interest is the development of useful synthetic procedures in an economical, energy-saving, easy to handle and environmentally sound way. An attractive new transformation is expected to show not only high efficiency and good selectivity but also a reasonable E factor.2 By far, the reaction component most responsible for the elevated E factor is organic solvents,3a many of which are considered to have negative impact on ecological systems. One elegant solution is to develop reactions under solvent-free conditions4 or to use “greener” solvents3 such as water, supercritical CO2, ionic liquid or ethanol. While the introduction of green reaction media has reduced the overall consumption of toxic solvents, most such syntheses still require substantial amounts of environmentally harmful solvents for subsequent workup and product purification. Thus, the development of practical synthetic methodologies involving exclusively green solvents is undoubtedly in high demand.

Functionalized 4H-pyranes, especially novel bicyclic molecules incorporating a 4H-pyrane moiety, have received much attention from both synthetic and medicinal chemists because of their huge potential in drug discovery.5 Such compounds have already been demonstrated to have antiviral, antifungal, antibacterial, and anticonvulsant activity, as well as activity against the excitatory amino acid transporter 1 (EAAT1), linked to episodic ataxia (Fig. 1). The diverse bioactivity of these molecules appears to depend mainly on the fused ring system, since bioactive 4H-pyranes have quite similar substituents at the 2-, 3- and 4-positions. This suggests that assembling new polycyclic framework based on this core structure, especially involving pharmacologically relevant heterocycles,6 may provide additional leads for drug discovery.


image file: c6ra06441h-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Selected bioactive molecules incorporating a 4H-pyrane core structure.5

A typical strategy for constructing such hetero bi- and tri-cycles is via an elegant formal [3 + 3] cyclization reaction of benzylidenemalononitriles and carbonyl nucleophiles (Scheme 1). This strategy has led to remarkable advances in medicinal chemistry,5 but the resulting 4H-pyrane fused ring systems have still been limited to ketone and (hetero-)aromatics. Herein, we report an amine catalysed formal [4 + 2] reaction via a 1,4-conjugate addition and cyclization cascade7 that generates novel fused bicyclic 4H-pyranes with a γ-lactam functionality.8 Notably, this transformation is characterized by its high efficiency, exclusive 1,4-regioselectivity, environmental friendliness and operational simplicity.


image file: c6ra06441h-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Assembly of fused bicyclic 4H-pyranes with a γ-lactam moiety via formal [4 + 2] cyclization.

Initially, we chose readily available 1-benzyl-4-benzylidene-pyrrolidine-2,3-dione9 1a and malononitrile 2 as model substrates to test the feasibility of this approach. To our satisfaction, the reaction proceeded smoothly in water at ambient temperature in the presence of piperidine 3a (10 mol% catalyst loading). Simple filtration and washing with warm water gave the desired racemic product 4a in good yield (Table 1, entry 1). Other amine catalysts such as pyrrolidine 3b, benzyl amine 3c and n,n-diethylamine 3d led to inferior results (Table 1, entries 2–4). Organic solvents were also screened in an attempt to increase yield, but pure products could not be directly obtained without using flash chromatography, and yields were much lower (Table 1, entries 5–10). The exception was ethanol, which gave the product in nearly quantitative yield (Table 1, entry 11).

Table 1 Screening studies of the formal [4 + 2] cyclizationa

image file: c6ra06441h-u1.tif

Entry 3 Solvent Purificationb Yieldc (%)
a Unless otherwise noted, reactions were performed with 0.1 mmol of 1a, 0.11 mmol of 2a, and 10 mol% of 3 in 1 mL solvent at rt for 5–30 min.b F&W: filtration and washing; FC: flash chromatography; for details, see ESI.c Isolated yield.d In the presence of 1 mol% 3a at rt for 15 min.
1 3a H2O F&W 84
2 3b H2O F&W 75
3 3c H2O F&W 78
4 3d H2O F&W 55
5 3a Toluene FC 76
6 3a THF FC 62
7 3a DCM FC 66
8 3a MeOH FC 78
9 3a MeCN FC 74
10 3a EtOAc FC 80
11 3a EtOH F&W 98
12d 3ad EtOH F&W 96
13d 3ad H2O F&W 82


Furthermore, based on the promising results (Table 1, entries 1 and 11), we tried to reduce the catalyst loading to 1 mol%, and the yield was only slightly affected (Table 1, entries 12 and 13). These results identify water and ethanol, both practical and environmentally benign, as effective media for this reaction at ambient temperature in the presence of 1 mol% of piperidine as catalyst.

With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, we investigated the generality of the formal [4 + 2] reactions, starting with ethanol as a higher-yield solvent. To our gratification, a broad range of cyclic α,β-enones with diverse steric and electronic properties could readily participate in this reaction. As summarized in Table 2, the N-protecting groups on the amide in the enone substrate negligibly influenced the results (Table 2, 4a, 4b). Various α,β-enones with electron-donating or – withdrawing substituents at para-, meta-, or ortho-positions of the aromatic rings were well tolerated, affording the expected hetero bicycles 4c–4m in good to excellent yield.

Table 2 Substrate scope of the formal [4 + 2] cyclization in ethanola

image file: c6ra06441h-u2.tif

a Unless otherwise noted, reactions were performed with 0.2 mmol of 1, 0.22 mmol of 2, and 1 mol% of 3a in 2 mL solvent at rt for about 15 min; chromatography-free work up; data for isolated yield; for details, see ESI.b The correct structure of product 4l was further confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis.
image file: c6ra06441h-u3.tif


Substrates with strong electron-donating groups or sensitive functionalities such as free hydroxyls also reacted smoothly under standard reaction conditions, albeit with slightly lower yield (Table 2, 4n, 4o). An enone bearing ortho- and para-dichlorobenzene group could also be efficiently cyclized (Table 2, 4p). Furthermore, polycyclic- and heterocyclic-aromatic moieties were investigated because of their biological importance, which led to the corresponding 4q and 4r in satisfactory yield.

The development of catalytic reactions in water,10 as the ultimate environmentally neutral solvent, is arguably one of the most interesting topics in current organic chemistry. Therefore, we reinvestigated the generality of the above reactions using water as the medium. Some representative substrates were examined, which included substituents with different electronic properties as well as hetero-aromatics. The results compared favorably to those obtained with ethanol (Table 3). In fact, using water in some cases led to even higher yield (e.g. Table 3, entry 2 vs. Table 2, 4c).

Table 3 Study of the formal [4 + 2] cyclization in watera

image file: c6ra06441h-u4.tif

Entry 1 4 Yieldb (%)
a Unless otherwise noted, reactions were performed with 0.2 mmol of 1a, 0.22 mmol of 2a, and 1 mol% of 3a in 2 mL water at rt for 30 min.b Isolated yield for dry product.
1 1a 4a 82
2 1c 4c 92
3 1d 4d 88
4 1f 4f 77
5 1g 4g 82
6 1i 4i 78
7 1j 4j 83
8 1k 4k 90
9 1q 4q 75
10 1r 4r 84


To further illustrate the practicality of this methodology, the reaction with 1a was scaled up to 10 mmol under optimal conditions in ethanol. The desired product 4a was obtained in excellent yield (Scheme 2). The correct structures of this new collection of compounds were further confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis of the representative product 4l (Fig. 2).11


image file: c6ra06441h-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Gram-scale synthesis of fused bicyclic 4H-pyrane 4a via formal [4 + 2] cyclization under optimal reaction conditions.

image file: c6ra06441h-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of product 4l.11

The new compound library of 4a–4r was screened for preliminary in vitro antibacterial activity against three ATCC-bacterial strains: Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) and Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212).12 Antibacterial activity was assessed using the broth dilution method.13 The novel bicyclic 4H-pyranes exhibited promising antibacterial activity, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 16 to 128 μg mL−1 (Table 4). In the case of E. coli, most of the compounds did not show antibacterial activity except for 4k, 4m, 4q and 4r. On the other hand, the activity against P. aeruginosa and E. faecalis was generally quite good. In particular, compounds with meta-chlorobenzene, naphthalene or thiophene moieties showed promising antibacterial activity at relatively lower concentrations (Table 4, entries 11, 17 and 18).

Table 4 Preliminary study of antibacterial activity of the fused bicyclic 4H-pyranesa
Entry Compound MICa (μg mL−1)
E. colib P. aeruginosac E. faecalisd
a MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration (μg mL−1).b E. coli: Gram-negative, MIC of cefotaxime: 1 μg mL−1 (positive control).c P. aeruginosa: Gram-negative, MIC of cefotaxime: 16 μg mL−1 (positive control).d E. faecalis: Gram-positive, MIC of benzylpenicillin: 4 μg mL−1 (positive control).
1 4a >128 64 64
2 4b >128 128 64
3 4c >128 64 128
4 4d >128 128 >128
5 4e >128 128 128
6 4f >128 64 64
7 4g >128 64 64
8 4h >128 128 128
9 4i >128 64 32
10 4j >128 128 128
11 4k 64 16 32
12 4l >128 64 64
13 4m 128 32 32
14 4n >128 128 128
15 4o >128 64 64
16 4p >128 128 128
17 4q 128 32 16
18 4r 128 32 16


Conclusions

In summary, we have developed an amine catalysed formal [4 + 2] cycloaddition in green solvent that generates novel bicyclic 4H-pyranes with γ-lactam functionalities. The advantages of this protocol include highly efficient bond formation, mild reaction conditions, simple work-up, environmentally benign solvents and reasonable isolated yield. Preliminary biological study of the synthesized compounds showed promising in vitro antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa and E. faecalis. Investigation of medicinal applications of these fused bicyclic 4H-pyranes and of chiral amine catalysed asymmetric synthesis are currently underway in our laboratory.

Acknowledgements

Financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21502009, 81573588 and 81573589), Scientific Research Fund of Sichuan Provincial Education Department (no. 16ZB0430), the Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Systematic research, development and Utilization of Chinese Medicine Resources, and the Start-up Fund of Chengdu University (no. 2081915026 and 2080515047)is gratefully acknowledged.

Notes and references

  1. (a) M. Poliakoff and P. Licence, Nature, 2007, 450, 810 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) R. Noyori, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 5 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) T. Gaich and P. S. Baran, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 4657 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) D. K. Leahy, J. L. Tucker, I. Mergelsberg, P. J. Dunn, M. E. Kopach and V. C. Purohit, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2013, 17, 1099 CrossRef CAS; (e) Q.-L. Zhou, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015 DOI:10.1002/anie.201509164; (f) G. Jürjens, A. Kirschning and D. A. Candito, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2015, 32, 723 RSC.
  2. (a) R. A. Sheldon, Chem. Ind., 1992, 903 CAS; (b) R. A. Sheldon, Chem. Ind., 1997, 12 CAS; (c) R. A. Sheldon, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 1997, 68, 381 CrossRef CAS; (d) R. A. Sheldon, Green Chem., 2007, 9, 1273 RSC.
  3. (a) C. Reichardt, Solvent and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003 Search PubMed; (b) P. G. Jessop, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 1391 RSC; (c) C. Capello, U. Fischer and K. Hungerbühler, Green Chem., 2007, 9, 927 RSC; (d) Y. Gu and F. Jérôme, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 9550 RSC; (e) F. Roschangar, R. A. Sheldon and C. H. Senanayake, Green Chem., 2015, 17, 752 RSC. For selected examples, see: (f) P. Raveendran, J. Fu and S. L. Wallen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 13940 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) T. Vivekanand, P. Vinoth, B. Agieshkumar, N. Sampath, A. Sudalai, J. C. Menéndez and V. Sridharan, Green Chem., 2015, 17, 3415 RSC; (h) M. Sandoval, P. Hoyos, A. Cortés, T. Bavaro, M. Terreni and M. J. Hernáiz, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 55495 RSC; (i) S. Gupta, P. Chaudhary, L. Seva, S. Sabiah and J. Kandasamy, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 89133 RSC; (j) C. Bayón, M. Moracci and M. J. Hernáiz, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 55313 RSC.
  4. (a) M. A. P. Martins, C. P. Frizzo, D. N. Moreira, L. Buriol and P. Machado, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 4140 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) K. Tanaka, Solvent-Free Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003 Search PubMed; (c) G. W. V. Cave, C. L. Raston and J. L. Scott, Chem. Commun., 2001, 2159 RSC; (d) M. S. Singh and S. Chowdhury, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 4547 RSC; For selected recent examples using solvent-free strategy: (e) S.-J. Jeon, H. Li and P. J. Walsh, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 16416 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) A. Sakakura, K. Kawajiri, T. Ohkubo, Y. Kosugi and K. Ishihara, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 14775 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) J. Safaei-Ghomi and R. Masoomi, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 15591 RSC; (h) T. Vivekanand, P. Vinoth, B. Agieshkumar, N. Sampath, A. Sudalai, J. C. Menéndez and V. Sridharan, Green Chem., 2015, 17, 3415 RSC.
  5. For selected recent examples, see: (a) T. H. V. Huynh, I. Shim, H. Bohr, B. Abrahamsen, B. Nielsen, A. A. Jensen and L. Bunch, J. Med. Chem., 2012, 55, 5403 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) W. Kemnitzer, J. Drewe, S. Jiang, H. Zhang, J. Zhao, C. Crogan-Grundy, L. Xu, S. Lamothe, H. Gourdeau, R. Denis, B. Tseng, S. Kasibhatla and S. X. Cai, J. Med. Chem., 2007, 50, 2858 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) A. Solhy, A. Elmakssoudi, R. Tahir, M. Karkouri, M. Larzek, M. Bousmina and M. Zahouily, Green Chem., 2010, 12, 2261 RSC; (d) G. Brahmachari and B. Banerjee, Asian J. Org. Chem., 2016, 5, 271 CrossRef CAS; (e) S. R. Mandha, S. Siliveri, M. Alla, V. R. Bommena, M. R. Bommineni and S. Balasubramanian, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2012, 22, 5272 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) J. Marco-Contelles, R. León, C. de los Ríos, A. G. García, M. G. López and M. Villarroya, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2006, 14, 8176 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) R. León, J. Marco-Contelles, A. G. García and M. Villarroya, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2005, 13, 1167 CrossRef PubMed; (h) M. Kidwai, S. Saxena, M. K. R. Khan and S. S. Thukral, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2005, 15, 4295 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. For the developed interesting scaffolds in medicinal chemistry, see: C. M. Marson, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 5514 RSC , and the references therein.
  7. P.-F. Xu and W. Wang, Catalytic Cascade Reactions, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2014, and the references therein Search PubMed.
  8. For selected recent studies about γ-lactam, see: (a) C.-S. Li, Y. Ding, B.-J. Yang, G. Miklossy, H.-Q. Yin, L. A. Walker, J. Turkson and S. Cao, Org. Lett., 2015, 17, 3556 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) K. S. Martin, M. J. Di Maso, J. C. Fettinger and J. T. Shaw, ACS Comb. Sci., 2013, 15, 356 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) A. L. Vergnon, R. S. Pottorf, M. P. Winters and M. R. Player, J. Comb. Chem., 2004, 6, 903 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) K. Dolbeare, G. F. Pontoriero, S. K. Gupta, R. K. Mishra and R. L. Johnson, J. Med. Chem., 2003, 46, 727 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. (a) X. Chen, L. Zhu, L. Fang, S. Yan and J. Lin, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 9926 RSC; (b) S. Zhang, Y.-C. Luo, X.-Q. Hu, Z.-Y. Wang, Y.-M. Liang and P.-F. Xu, J. Org. Chem., 2015, 80, 7288 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. For selected reviews on this topic, see: (a) M. B. Gawande, V. D. B. Bonifacio, R. Luque, P. S. Branco and R. S. Varma, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 5522 RSC; (b) M.-O. Simon and C.-J. Li, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 1415 RSC; (c) A. Chanda and V. V. Fokin, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 725 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) C.-J. Li, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 3095 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) S. Narayan, J. Muldoon, M. G. Finn, V. V. Fokin, H. C. Kolb and K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 3275 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) U. M. Lindström, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 2751 CrossRef.
  11. CCDC 1439424 (4l) contains the supplementary cycstallo-graphic data for this paper..
  12. For motivation of this antibacterial activity study of the bicyclic 4H-pyranes, see ESI..
  13. (a) L. Ouyang, Y. Huang, Y. Zhao, G. He, Y. Xie, J. Liu, J. He, B. Liu and Y. Wei, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2012, 22, 3044 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) Farhanullah, T. Kang, E.-J. Yoon, E.-C. Choi, S. Kim and J. Lee, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2009, 44, 239 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures, characterization data for new compounds. CCDC 1439424. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c6ra06441h

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.