Mild, efficient, and environmentally friendly synthesis of symmetrical N,N′-alkylidenebisamides under solvent-free conditions catalyzed by H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)]

R. Tayebee*a, B. Malekia, F. M. Zonoza, R. M. Kakhkib and T. Kunania
aDepartment of Chemistry, School of Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, 96179-76487, Iran. E-mail: Rtayebee@hsu.ac.ir; Fax: +98-51-44410300; Tel: +98-51-44410310
bDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Gonabad, Gonabad, Iran

Received 21st January 2016 , Accepted 8th February 2016

First published on 15th February 2016


Abstract

A series of symmetrical N,N′-alkylidenebisamides were successfully synthesized via a one-pot three-component green and environmentally friendly condensation of aliphatic and/or aromatic aldehydes with benzamide by the mediation of 2.5 mol% H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] as a Lewis/Bronsted acid catalyst with good to excellent yields in moderately short reaction times. This developed methodology is effective for diverse substituted aldehydes; thus, it constitutes a general synthetic route for the preparation of symmetrical alkylidenebisamides. Findings demonstrated that aromatic aldehydes containing electron-withdrawing groups are more effective than their electron-donating counterparts.


1. Introduction

The development of simple, effectual, and clean methodologies for the economic preparation of extensively used pharmacophores by using readily available reagents under catalytic conditions are the major challenges for chemists attempting to improve the quality of the environment.1,2 Compounds bearing amide and bisamide groups are important intermediates in organic synthesis and can be easily transformed into other pharmacological and peptidomimetic materials.3 Bisamides are key fragments for the introduction of gem-diaminoalkyl residues in retro-inverse pseudo-peptide derivatives.4,5 Prevalence of amide moieties in natural products and pharmacologically active compounds has established a diverse array of synthetic approaches to these compounds; therefore, preparation of amides has been attracted considerable attention.6,7

Symmetrical alkylidenebisamides are usually prepared by the direct reaction of an aldehyde with the corresponding amide. So far, various Bronsted acids, such as phosphotungstic acid,8 sulfamic acid,9 triflic acid,10 p-toluene sulfonic acid,11 SiO2–MgCl2,12 B(HSO4)3,13 and silica supported polyphosphoric acid (SiO2-PPA)14 have been employed to catalyze the reaction. Although, strong Bronsted acids showed high catalytic activity, but these expensive materials are usually corrosive, toxic, and rare; hence, they are not beneficial to industrial applications. Moreover, most of the introduced methods were not gratifying and need certain restrictions with regards to scope and reaction conditions.

Due to the above comments, investigation of suitable Bronsted/Lewis acids as efficient catalysts under mild conditions is required for the target transformation. During the course of our investigations directed towards the development of environmentally friendly procedures for several important organic transformations,15–19 we introduce capability of the Wells–Dawson H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] as an efficient acid catalyst for the synthesis of symmetrical N,N′-alkylidenebisamides through condensation of aryl aldehydes with benzamide under solvent free conditions at 80 °C (Scheme 1). This catalyst could be easily prepared and reused for several times without considerable loss of activity.


image file: c6ra01811d-s1.tif
Scheme 1 General formulation for the preparation of symmetrical N,N′-alkylidenebisamides.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and methods

All starting materials and solvents were obtained from commercial sources and used as received. H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)],20 K6[P2W18O62],21 H14[NaP5W30O40],22 and H3[PMo12O40],23 were prepared according to the reported methods. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on a 8700 Shimadzu Fourier Transform spectrophotometer in the region of 400 to 4000 cm−1 using KBr pellets. Progress of the reactions was monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC). Melting points were recorded on a Bamstead electrothermal type 9200 melting point apparatus. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AVANCE 100 and 400 MHz instruments using TMS as internal reference. All products were identified by comparison of their spectral and physical data with those previously reported.24–26

2.2. Synthesis of α2-K10P2W17O61·20H2O

α2-K10P2W17O61·20H2O was prepared according to the literature procedure.27 K6[α- or β-P2W18062]·XH2O (80 g, 1.15 mol) was dissolved in 200 ml water. Then, 20 g (200 mmol) of potassium hydrogen carbonate in 200 ml water was added while stirring. The reaction was completed after 1 h and the white precipitate was filtered on a coarse sintered glass frit. The solid product was dried under suction; then, re-dissolved in 500 ml hot water (95 °C). The snow-like crystals appeared on cooling (after 3 h) were filtered and dried under suction for 5 h. The final solid product (57 g, 70%) was air-dried for 2 to 3 days.

2.3. Preparation of K72-Fe(OH2)(P2W17O61)·19H2O

A sample containing 2.43 g (6 mmol) of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O was dissolved in 65 ml water, and 23 g (4.7 mmol) of α2-K10P2W17O61·20H2O was added with complete stirring. The whole dissolution achieved at 30 °C, and the solution was left at 6 °C overnight. The appeared yellow crystals were filtered and dried in air. Anal. calcd for K7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)]·19H2O: K, 5.6; P, 1.28; Fe, 1.15; W, 64.4; H2O, 7.42. Found: K, 5.46; P, 1.29; Fe, 1.16; W, 65.2; H2O, 7.41.

2.4. Preparation of H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] acid catalyst

Wells–Dawson H7[(p2W17O61)Fe(H2O)] acid catalyst (HPA) was prepared according to the previously reported method.28 The iron-substituted hetropolyanion, K72-Fe(OH2)(P2W17O61)·19H2O was converted into the corresponding acid by passing it through a column of Dowex-50w-X8 ion exchange resin. A sample of K72-Fe(OH2)(P2W17O61)·19H2O (2 g) was dissolved in 50 ml water; then, the solution passed through the resin column in the H+ form. This process was repeated for two times. Slow evaporation of the final solution gave the pure H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)].

2.5. General procedure for the preparation of N,N′-alkylidenebisamides

To a mixture of aldehyde (2 mmol) and amide (4 mmol) was added 0.01 mmol of H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)]. Then, the mixture was stirred at 80 °C in an oil bath and the reaction was followed by TLC analysis (n-hexane/ethyl acetate, 3[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]2). After completion of the reaction, the mass was cooled to 25 °C, and the mixture was dissolved in boiling ethanol. The liquor involving catalyst and starting materials was concentrated and the solid product was purified by re-crystallization in ethanol 40% as the appropriate solvent. All products were characterized by IR and 1H NMR as obtained in the ESI.

3. Results and discussion

To investigate easy, one-pot, and environmentally benign synthetic routes to prepare different organic aggregates, the condensation reaction of aromatic aldehydes and benzamide was studied in the presence of a catalytic amount of H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] under solvent free conditions.

In order to investigate the appropriate amount of catalyst, a model reaction was carried out by applying 0–10 mol% of HPA for the preparation of N,N′-(phenylmethylene)dibenzamide (Table 1). First, the reaction was non-productive to give the correlative product in the absence of heteropolyacid and led to only 20% of product after 2 h (entry 1) which indicated that presence of catalyst plays an important role in the reaction progress. It was found that 1 mol% of catalyst attained 50% yield after 20 min (entry 2). This observation established that the HPA catalyst exhibited high catalytic activity in the desired transformation. Then, the reaction of benzaldehyde with benzamide was conducted in the presence of a catalytic amount of HPA (2.5 mol%). After completion of the reaction followed by standard work-up and purification, the corresponding N,N′-alkylidenebisamide was obtained in 85% yield (Table 1, entry 3).

Table 1 Effect of catalyst amount on the condensation of benzaldehyde with benzamidea
Entry H7[(p2W17O61)Fe(H2O)] (mol%) Time (min) Yield (%)
a The desired amount of H7[(p2W17O61)Fe(H2O)] was added to a mixture of benzaldehyde (2 mmol) and benzamide (4 mmol). Then, the mixture was stirred at 80 °C in an oil bath and the reaction was followed by TLC. After completion of the reaction, the crude product was purified as described in the Experimental section.
1 0 120 20
2 1 20 50
3 2.5 20 85
4 5 20 77
5 10 20 75


As is envisaged, yield% was increased with enhancing catalyst concentration and the maximum yield of 85% was achieved with 2.5 mol% of catalyst after 20 min. However, higher amounts of catalyst lowered yield% to 75 at the same time (entry 5). Therefore, 2.5 mol% of catalyst was chosen as the optimal quantity to push the reaction forward.

Organic solvents are on the top of the list of damaging chemicals, because they are employed in enormous amounts and are usually volatile liquids that are difficult to be stored. Search for alternative reaction media to replace volatile, flammable, and often toxic solvents commonly used in organic synthesis is an important objective in the development of green chemical processes. Therefore, efficacy of the solvent-free condition was compared with the solvent condition by carrying out condensation of benzaldehyde with benzamide in different solvents (Table 2). Fortunately, the best yield was achieved under solvent-free case with less reaction time and found as optimum condition. However, a considerable amount of the desired product was formed in methanol, acetonitrile, and chloroform with 35, 30, and 20% yields, respectively.

Table 2 Effect of different solvents on the condensation of benzaldehyde with benzamidea
Entry Solvents Time (h) Yield (%)
a Reaction condition is described below Table 1.
1 Acetonitrile 17 30
2 n-Hexane 17 10
3 Methanol 17 35
4 Chloroform 17 20
5 Solvent free 20 min 85


To improve the yield% and optimize the reaction conditions, effect of temperature was studied on the condensation reaction of benzaldehyde with benzamide (Fig. 1). At 80 °C, the reaction proceeded smoothly and almost complete conversion of the product was observed after 20 min. Further increase in temperature didn't improve yield%; therefore, the reaction temperature 80 °C was kept for all runs. Reactions at different conditions and at various molar ratios of substrates in the presence of the heterogeneous H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] revealed that the best condition was solvent-free at 80 °C in the presence of 2.5 mol% catalyst.


image file: c6ra01811d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Effect of reaction temperature on the condensation of benzaldehyde with benzamide.

Effect of reaction time was also investigated to explore minimum time required to obtain the maximum yield in the preparation of N,N′-alkylidenebisamide. As illustrated in Fig. 2, 20 min is sufficient to get 85% yield. No important increase in yield% was detected after a prolonged reaction time.


image file: c6ra01811d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Effect of reaction time on the condensation of benzaldehyde with benzamide.

Effect of the kind of the heteropolyacid was investigated on the efficacy of the catalytic system. Therefore, catalytic activity ofH7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] was compared with other indicative familiar heteropolyacids in the preparation of N,N′-(phenylmethylene)dibenzamide (Table 3). Almost, all the introduced Keggin and Wells–Dawson heteropolyacids behaved as good catalysts in the respective transformation. Although, Keggin and Wells–Dawson heteropolyacids have different structures, however, both types behaved similar in the preparation of N,N′-alkylidenebisamide derivatives. Among different HPA's, the Preyssler type showed less catalytic activity and resulted in 40% yield after 20 min. Many factors such as acidity of the heteropolyacid, negative charge density smeared over oxygen atoms, structural composition and distortions, and approach of the substrate molecule into the bulk of the heteropolyacid would contribute to the catalytic efficiency of the heteropolyacids under the reaction conditions.29

Table 3 Effect of the heteropolyacid nature and structure on the efficacy of the preparation of N,N′-alkylidenebisamidea
Catalyst Structure type Time (min) Yield (%)
a 2.5 mol% of catalyst was used in all cases. Yield% refers to the isolated yield.
H3PMo12O40 Keggin 20 68
H3PW12O40 Keggin 20 77
H6P2W18O62 Wells–Dawson 20 81
H4SiW12O40 Si-substituted Keggin 20 65
H7[(p2W17O61)Fe(H2O)] Wells–Dawson 20 85
H5PW10V2O40 Keggin 20 79
H14NaP5W30O110 Preyssler 20 40


With the obtained optimal conditions and to show the generality of the reaction, the reaction of a series of aromatic aldehydes bearing different substituents was studied with benzamide to afford the corresponding symmetrical N,N′-alkylidenebisamides (Table 4). It seems that substitution at the para-position of the aromatic ring produced no significant effects; aldehydes possessing electron-donating groups caused slightly lower reaction yields. Whereas, aromatic aldehydes substituted with electron-withdrawing groups reacted well to give the corresponding products in good to excellent yields under the reaction conditions. However, the reaction of benzaldehyde with acetamide did not occur and only starting material was recovered (Scheme 2). Moreover, in order to synthesize the unsymmetrical N,N′-alkylidenebisamides, the reaction of benzaldehyde with one equivalent of benzamide and one equivalent of acetamide was carried out. The reaction provided only symmetrical N,N′-alkylidenebisamide derived from benzamide.

Table 4 Synthesis of different N,N′-alkylidenebisamides in the presence of H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] under solvent-free conditionsa

image file: c6ra01811d-u1.tif

Aldehyde m.p. (°C) Lit. m.p. (°C) Time (min) Yield (%) Product
a Yields refer to the isolated pure products. The desired pure products were characterized by comparison of their physical data with those of known compounds. Melting points refer to the desired products.
Benzaldehyde 238–239 237–238 20 85 image file: c6ra01811d-u2.tif
3-NO2-benzaldehyde 234–236 236–237 20 97 image file: c6ra01811d-u3.tif
4-NO2-benzaldehyde 240–242 241–243 15 98 image file: c6ra01811d-u4.tif
4-Cl-benzaldehyde 231–233 232–235 20 93 image file: c6ra01811d-u5.tif
2-MeO-benzaldehyde 230–232 229–230 20 77 image file: c6ra01811d-u6.tif
4-Br-benzaldehyde 261–263 252–254 20 98 image file: c6ra01811d-u7.tif
4-F-benzaldehyde 225–227 226–228 40 76 image file: c6ra01811d-u8.tif
4-Me-benzaldehyde 224–225 224–226 30 82 image file: c6ra01811d-u9.tif
4-Pyridylaldehyde 208–213 208–212 75 73 image file: c6ra01811d-u10.tif
4-N(CH3)2-benzaldehyde 208–210 210–212 75 64 image file: c6ra01811d-u11.tif
Ph-(CH2)2-COH 249–251 248–249 75 67 image file: c6ra01811d-u12.tif
CH3-(CH2)2-COH 171–173 172–173 60 77 image file: c6ra01811d-u13.tif
(CH3)2-CH-COH 126–128 126–127 75 68 image file: c6ra01811d-u14.tif



image file: c6ra01811d-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Reaction of benzaldehyde with one equivalent of benzamide and one equivalent of acetamide.

Comparison of the efficacy of H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] catalyst with some reported catalysts is presented in Table 5. The model reaction of benzamide and benzaldehyde was considered as a representative example and the comparison was in terms of mol% or amount of the catalyst, temperature, reaction time, and percentage yields. Evidently, H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] was more effective than most of the conventional catalysts listed in Table 5. The present methodology employed a very low amount of the catalyst under solvent-free conditions. Although, some of the introduced additives catalyzed the reaction, even though at a lower temperature, they required toxic and expensive solvents, higher mol% of catalyst, and longer reaction times. The present catalytic system conveys distinct advantages in competition with the previously reported methods, in terms of yield%, mild reaction conditions, simple procedure and work-up, and lack of toxicity.

Table 5 Comparison of the catalytic efficiency of H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] with some reported catalysts
Entry Catalyst and conditions Time (min) Yield (%) Ref.
1 ZnCl2, solvent, 110 °C, 20 mol% 180 91 30
2 SiO2–BaCl2, solvent free, 100 °C, 0.025 g 120 74 31
3 SiO2–MgCl2, solvent-free, 100 °C, 0.025 g 180 73 12
4 Phosphotungstic acid, toluene/reflux, 0.3 mmol 1200 70 8
5 B(OH)3, MW, 0.3 mmol 40 80 24
6 BF3·SiO2, CHCl3/reflux, 0.03 g 270 81 25
7 SiO2-PPA, solvent free, 100 °C, 0.025 g 70 60 32
8 Boric acid, toluene, 120 °C, 0.3 mmol 960 92 24
9 H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)], 80 °C, 2.5 mol% 20 85


Reusability and reproducibility of H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] was approved in the synthesis of N,N′-(phenylmethylene)dibenzamide, as shown in Fig. 3. The catalyst was recovered from the reaction mixture via eluting with ethyl acetate after each run, washed thoroughly with ethanol, dried in an oven at 90 °C for 4 h and tested in the subsequent run. The catalyst was tested for six runs. It was observed that the catalyst displayed very good reusability. Moreover, to ensure reproducibility of the transformation, repeated typical experiments were carried out under identical reaction conditions. The obtained yields were found to be reproducible within ±3% variation.


image file: c6ra01811d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Yield% as a function of reusability of H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)].

To confirm that the catalytic activity was generated from the heterpolyacid catalyst, and not from the decomposed components of the heteropolyacid in the reaction mixture, a hot filtration test was planned. In this technique, to a mixture of aldehyde (2 mmol) and amide (4 mmol) was added 0.01 mmol of H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] and the reaction was continued as described in the Experimental section. At this stage, the yield of the product was 75%. Then, the catalyst was filtered off under hot conditions and with the filtrate obtained after separation of the catalyst, the reaction was continued for another 15 min at the same reaction temperature. However, no corresponding increase in yield beyond 75% was attained. This result clearly confirmed the stability of the heteropolyacid in this condensation reaction and no degradation of the heteropolyacid occurred during the course of the reaction. This result was also confirmed by reusability and reproducibility studies of the catalyst as mentioned above. Moreover, 31P NMR spectrum of the re-used catalyst was very similar to the fresh one and no change was occurred in the structure of the heteropolyacid after six re-using.

Finally, a plausible reaction pathway for the preparation of N,N′-alkylidenebisamides in the presence of H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] is proposed in Scheme 3. It is conceivable that H+ from the heteropolyacid first bound to the carbonyl oxygen of the aromatic aldehyde and increased its Lewis acidity. Then, benzamide attaches to the carbonyl group of aldehyde and led to the generation of (I) and followed by loss of H2O affords (II). As reported in the literature, the Knoevenagel type coupling of benzamide with an active carbonyl compound such as benzaldehyde gives N,N′-alkylidenebisamide.33


image file: c6ra01811d-s3.tif
Scheme 3 Proposed mechanism for the synthesis of N,N′-alkylidenebisamide.

4. Conclusion

A green and easily available H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] was used as a strong, effective, and selective Lewis/Bronsted acid catalyst for the preparation of symmetrical N,N′-alkylidenebisamides under solvent-free conditions. The present protocol has some advantages over the previously reported methods, such as good to excellent product yields, short reaction times, low toxicity, low cost, and simple scale-up. The work-up procedure is very clear-cut; that is, the products were isolated and purified by simple filtration and re-crystallization from aqueous ethanol.

Acknowledgements

Partial financial support from the Research Councils of Hakim Sabzevari University is greatly appreciated.

References

  1. W. Bannwarth and B. Hinzen, in Combinatorial Chemistry: From Theory to Application, Wiley NCH, Weinheim, 2006 Search PubMed.
  2. K. Tanaka and G. Kaupp, in Solvent-free organic synthesis, Wiley VCH, Weinheim, 2009 Search PubMed.
  3. (a) R. S. Varma, Green Chem., 1999, 43 RSC; (b) H. R. Shaterian, M. Ghashang and M. Feyzi, Appl. Catal., A, 2008, 345, 128 CrossRef CAS; (c) H. R. Shaterian, M. Ghashang and A. Hassankhani, Dyes Pigm., 2008, 76, 564 CrossRef CAS.
  4. P. Pallai, R. Struthers, M. Goodman, L. Moroder and E. Wunsch, Biochemistry, 1985, 24, 1933 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. M. Rodriguez, P. Dubreuil, J. P. Bali and J. Martinez, J. Med. Chem., 1987, 30, 758 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. (a) E. E. Magat, B. F. Faris, I. E. Reith and L. F. Salisbury, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1951, 73, 1028 CrossRef CAS; (b) H. R. Shaterian, A. Hosseinian and M. Ghashang, Can. J. Chem., 2008, 86, 376 CrossRef CAS.
  7. A. H. Fernandez, R. M. Alvarez and T. M. Abajo, Synthesis, 1996, 1299 CrossRef CAS.
  8. G. Harichandran, S. D. Amalraj and P. Shanmugam, Indian J. Chem., 2011, 50, 77 Search PubMed.
  9. N. P. Selvam, S. Saranya and P. T. Perumal, Can. J. Chem., 2008, 86, 32 CrossRef CAS.
  10. J. Pernak, B. Mrowczynski and J. Weglewski, Synthesis, 1994, 12, 1415 CrossRef.
  11. M. Anary-Abbasinejad, M. H. Mosslemin, A. Hassanabadi and S. T. Safa, Synth. Commun., 2010, 40, 2209 CrossRef CAS.
  12. M. R. M. Shafiee, Lett. Org. Chem., 2011, 8, 562 CrossRef CAS.
  13. Z. Karimi-Jaberi and B. Pooladian, Monatsh. Chem., 2013, 144, 659 CrossRef CAS.
  14. M. Anary-Abbasinejad, M. Mosslemin and A. Hassanzbadi, J. Chem. Res., 2009, 218 CrossRef CAS.
  15. R. Tayebee, M. M. Amini, S. Pouyamanesh and A. Aliakbari, Dalton Trans., 2015, 44, 5888 RSC.
  16. R. Tayebee, M. M. Amini, M. Akbariu and A. Aliakbari, Dalton Trans., 2015, 44, 9596 RSC.
  17. R. Tayebee, M. Jarrahi, B. Maleki, M. KargarRazi, Z. B. Mokhtari and S. M. Baghbanian, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 10869 RSC.
  18. R. Tayebee and M. Jarrahi, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 21206 RSC.
  19. R. Tayebee, M. M. Amini, H. Rostamian and A. Aliakbari, Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 1550 RSC.
  20. M.-C. Kuo, R. J. Stanis, J. R. Ferrell Iii, J. A. Turner and A. M. Herring, Electrochim. Acta, 2007, 52, 2051 CrossRef CAS.
  21. R. Contant, Inorg. Synth., 1990, 27, 104 CrossRef CAS.
  22. H. M. Alizadeh, P. Subhash, H. Y. Jeannin, J. M. Frere, T. Michael and J. Pope, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 2662 CrossRef.
  23. J. A. Dias, S. C. L. Dias, E. Caliman, J. Bartis and L. Francesconi, Inorg. Synth., 2014, 36, 210 CrossRef CAS.
  24. G. Harichandran, S. D. Amalraj and P. Shanmugam, J. Iran. Chem. Soc., 2011, 8, 298 CrossRef CAS.
  25. B. B. F Mirjalili, A. Bamoniri and S. A. Fazeli Attara, Iran. J. Catal., 2013, 3(3), 157 Search PubMed.
  26. Z. Karimi-Jaberi and B. Pooladian, Monatsh. Chem., 2013, 144, 659 CrossRef CAS.
  27. B. Dawson, Acta Crystallogr., 1953, 6, 113 CrossRef CAS.
  28. S. R. Matkovic, G. M. Valle and L. E. Briand, Mater. Res., 2005, 8, 351–355 CrossRef CAS.
  29. R. Tayebee, F. Nehzat, E. Rezaei-Seresht, F. Z. Mohammadi and E. Rafiee, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2011, 351, 154 CrossRef CAS.
  30. X. X. Shen, Y. L. Shen, Y. F. Han and Q. Liu, Adv. Mater. Res., 2012, 441, 421 CrossRef CAS.
  31. M. R. Mohammad Shafie, M. P. Zakaria and P. Aberomand Azar, Int. Conf. Chem., Biol. Environ. Eng., 2nd, 2010, 172 Search PubMed.
  32. M. R. Mohammad Shafiee, Lett. Org. Chem., 2011, 8, 562 CrossRef.
  33. F. Tamaddon, H. Kargar-Shooroki and A. A. Jafari, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2013, 368–369, 66 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ra01811d

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.