H/He interaction with vacancy-type defects in α-Al2O3 single crystals studied by positron annihilation

Guikai Zhang*, Xin Xiang, Feilong Yang, Lang Liu, Tao Tang, Yan Shi and Xiaolin Wang
Institute of Materials, China Academy of Engineering Physics, 621908, Jiangyou, China. E-mail: zhangguikai@caep.cn; Tel: +86 81636 26481

Received 11th January 2016 , Accepted 2nd February 2016

First published on 4th February 2016


Abstract

To probe the interaction of H and He, produced by tritium decay, with vacancy-type defects of α-Al2O3 as a tritium permeation barrier (TPB) in fusion reactors, α-Al2O3 single crystals were treated in pure Ar gas, D2 gas and T2 gas with subsequent tritium aging, respectively, and then their positron annihilation lifetimes and the type of defects that may contribute to the observed positron lifetime components were studied, in combination with DFT results. More monovacancies and vacancy clusters were formed in the thermally hydrogenated samples when compared to the fresh and Ar-annealed samples, indicating the stabilizing effect of hydrogen; this was consistent with the Fermi level position of α-Al2O3 moving towards the conduction band minimum (CBM) in the presence of hydrogen impurities, resulting in VAl3− and [VAl3−–H+]2− becoming more stable, as observed by DFT calculations. The monovacancies were slightly eliminated when the samples were thermally annealed and then aged in T2 gas at room temperature, indicating that He filled the vacancies. This was consistent with it being favourable for He atoms to occupy Al vacancies, with HeAl3− forming most readily, whilst more vacancy clusters were continuously induced, suggesting that Al–O bonds weakened and thus nano-hardness decreased with an external load. This study provides the first evidence that Al vacancies can be stabilized by H and filled with He, which will provide further novel TPB design opportunities.


1. Introduction

Various oxide materials, such as Al2O3, Y2O3, ZrO2 and so on, are used in fusion reactors as plasma diagnosis windows, electric insulators, oxide dispersion-strengthened (ODS) ferritic steels and tritium permeation barriers (TPBs).1 The use of TPBs of α-Al2O3 as the structural material, due to its chemical stability and low solubility for hydrogen, is an efficacious way to suppress hydrogen isotopic permeation through the steel walls of ducts for hydrogen storage and distribution, protection against hydrogen embrittlement and control of the tritium inventory in future fusion reactors like the ITER.2,3

The effectiveness of TPBs depends critically on the thermodynamics and kinetics of hydrogen transport within the barrier materials.2–4 It has been proposed that the properties of metal oxide materials are directly or indirectly connected to the presence of defects, such as vacancies, impurities, dislocations and grain boundaries.3,5 However, to the authors’ knowledge, interactions between hydrogen and defects in α-Al2O3, and their effects on the thermodynamics and kinetics of the H mass transport within α-Al2O3, have not been studied well; this is essential to explicitly identify and control the defect roles in H transport within α-Al2O3. Moreover, a deep knowledge of the physical mechanisms of deuterium, tritium and helium presenting in the selected materials due to tritium decay and the (n, a) reaction, and of their synergy determining the long-term stability of the materials, is important to assess long-term predictions of behaviour of operating components in fusion reactors.3

It is well known that vacancies are one of the simplest defect types in crystal structures, and so represent a benchmark for experimental and theoretical understanding, which is the foundation of exploring the fascinating properties of materials. What’s more, theoretical calculations have predicted that H and He-related vacancy defects in α-Al2O3 should play an enhancement role in low H transport in TPBs.6,7 H in α-Al2O3 is present mainly in the Hi+ state, and it is favourable for it to exist in the [VAl3−–H+]2− and HO+ forms. The positive binding energies of [VAl3−–H+] and HO+ should increase the activation energy of H migration, decreasing H mobility, which is favored for low H transport in α-Al2O3 TPBs.6 In the presence of He, forms of H–He complex defects in α-Al2O3 are [Hei–H+]+, [HeAl3−–H+]2− and [HO+–Hei]+. [HeAl3−–H+]2− and [HO+–Hei]+, with their positive binding energies, will increase the activation energy of H migration in α-Al2O3, which is also favorable for low H transport in TPBs.7 It can be seen from the theoretical findings outlined that the preferred positions and dominant migration modes for H(He) in α-Al2O3 depend on the presence of intrinsic defects acting as traps, especially vacancies. Thus, it is urgent to experimentally investigate H/He interactions with vacancy-type defects in α-Al2O3, providing further novel TPB design opportunities.

The experimental configuration applied for the study of H/He behaviour in the near-surface region of solids generally follows a three step approach:3 (1) H/He incorporation in the material, (2) thermal annealing under fully controlled conditions and (3) H/He measurement. Due to the very low H/He dissolution content in α-Al2O3 and sensitivity, the experimental H/He measurement signal of α-Al2O3 with H/He incorporated is always weak with conventional methods. Consequently, the identification and interactions of H/He-related defects are still debatable issues. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy has proven to be a powerful tool to experimentally probe H structures. Based on known IR absorption peaks for molecules containing hydroxyl groups, O–H (O–D) absorption bands are in the range of 3183.7–3309.3 cm−1 (2375.8–2469.6 cm−1), with the angle of OH (OD) ions protruding from the basal plane (most are <15°), depending on the sample conditions.8,9 One can compare IR spectra for samples immediately following hydrogenation and after certain periods at different temperature ‘anneals’, investigating the stability of OH complexes. However, He-related defects cannot be visibly detected by IR spectroscopy. From desorption peaks of thermal desorption spectrometry (TDS), one can extract the values of the different dissociation energy H(He)-related defects.3 However, which H/He-related defects can be attributed to IR modes or TDS dissociation energies must be identified with the aid of other tools, for example DFT calculations.

Positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS), with its sub-ppm sensitivity, is a powerful technique to identify neutral or negatively charged vacancy-type defects in materials of interest, and has been extensively used for characterization of such defects.10 Due to the lack of positive ion cores, positrons are trapped by the attractive potential, which leads to characteristic changes in the measured annihilation parameters. Therefore, positron lifetime measurements can be traced to the H and He decorating vacancies that induce the positron traps, which can give some indication about the nature of positron traps that are established during TPB operation.

Thus, in the present work, using PAS, positron annihilation experiments of α-Al2O3 single crystals were carried out at different annealing conditions, including annealing samples in Ar gas, D2 gas and T2 gas with subsequent tritium aging; the type of defects that may contribute to the observed positron lifetime components are discussed, with DFT results. Importantly, these results complement the systematic investigation of H/He interactions with defects of α-Al2O3, playing an important role in understanding the roles of hydrogen/helium in α-Al2O3 and in the design of efficient T-permeation-resistance materials for oxide TPBs. Moreover, the method can be extended to the oxide materials used in fusion reactors.

2. Experimental details

The α-Al2O3 piece samples, purchased from MTI Corporation (China), were single crystals of 17 mm external diameter and 0.5 mm thickness (purity: >99.99%), with a density of 3.98 g cm−3. They were polished to optical grade.

To introduce additional hydrogen or deuterium and determine the H effects on defect behavior, samples were sealed in quartz ampoules filled with 1.5 atm of deuterium gas (99.999%). The annealing was performed at 950 °C for 100 h and samples were quenched to room temperature by immersing the ampoules in water. IR absorption spectra were measured with a Fourier-transform IR spectrometer (Nicolet IS50R). The instrumental resolution was 2 cm−1. The IR absorption spectra of the D2-annealed samples are shown in Fig. 1. Peaks at around 2440–2480 cm−1, with a main frequency of 2458.70 cm−1, were observed. This observation was consistent with frequencies of OD peaks obtained earlier, shown in Table 1. Thus, D penetrated into the bulk α-Al2O3 under these annealing conditions.


image file: c6ra00612d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 IR spectra of the deuterium-annealed α-Al2O3 samples just after annealing for 100 h at 950 °C. A spectrum from a sample without a D2 anneal was used as a reference to calculate the absorbance spectra. All spectra were obtained at a sample temperature of 25 °C.
Table 1 OD frequencies of deuterium-annealed α-Al2O3 samples
  T, °C OD, cm−1 H charging method Ref.
α-Al2O3 25 2458.7 Thermal annealing This work
α-Al2O3 25 2436.9 Thermal annealing 8
α-Al2O3 25 2374.3, 2406.4, 2437.4, 2458.6 Electric-field assisted diffusion 9


Similarly, α-Al2O3 pieces were subsequently annealed in Ar gas (99.999%) at 950 °C for 100 h in the tube furnace, to identify the temperature effects on defect behavior and remove the defects induced by cutting and polishing. Two pieces were hydrogenated in tritium gas (99.9%) at 950 °C for 100 h in a stainless steel container, and stored at room temperature for 1.5 years under tritium gas, to identify the effects of helium-3 from tritium decay on defect behavior.

PAS was measured using a conventional fast coincident system at room temperature. The coincidence spectrometer had a prompt time resolution of 230 ps (FWHM) for the γ-rays from a 60Co source selected under the experimental conditions. During the measurement, the positron source was sandwiched between two identical sample pieces. The source (20 μCi) of 22Na was sandwiched between two identical sample disks. The positron lifetime spectrum containing 106 counts was analyzed by the POSITRONFIT program to decompose several lifetime components.

The spectra were analyzed using a program based on a sum of several exponential decay terms:11

 
image file: c6ra00612d-t1.tif(1)

Three lifetime components, τ1, τ2 and τ3, and their corresponding percentage intensities, I1, I2 and I3, were resolved in the case of the single crystal samples. Owing to the low intensity (<1%) of τ3, which was attributed to positron annihilation from the surface state and/or macroscopic defects,11 the effect of the longest lifetime τ3 has not been discussed in this work.

τav gives the overall defect information, and it is calculated as follows:

 
image file: c6ra00612d-t2.tif(2)

3. Results

The shorter lifetime component (τ1) and the corresponding intensity (I1) in different α-Al2O3 crystals are shown in Fig. 2. In the fresh α-Al2O3 sample, the τ1 was 111 ps. For the α-Al2O3 annealed in D2 gas, the τ1 was longer at 115 ps, 4% and 7% greater than in the fresh and Ar-annealed samples, respectively, with the relative intensity (I1) increasing from 52% in the Ar-annealed sample to 54% in the D2-annealed sample. For the α-Al2O3 annealed and then aged in T2 gas, with tritium in α-Al2O3 decaying to helium-3, at room temperature for 1.5 years, the τ1 was shorter at 113 ps, 2% smaller than in the D2-annealed sample. Correspondingly, the relative intensity (I1) of the sample decreased from 54% in the D2-annealed sample to 52% in the T2-aged sample.
image file: c6ra00612d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Positron lifetime component τ1 (a) and the corresponding intensity I1 (b) in different α-Al2O3 crystals: (1) fresh, (2) Ar-annealed, (3) D2-annealed and (4) T2-annealed and subsequently tritium-aged. The inset figures in (a) are local structures of VAl3− without and with H/He decoration.

The longer lifetime component (τ2) and the corresponding intensity (I2) in different α-Al2O3 crystals are shown in Fig. 3. In the fresh α-Al2O3, the τ2 was 320 ps, with a intensity (I2) of 46% (Fig. 3a). For the Ar-annealed sample, the τ2 decreased to 313 ps, whereas the intensity (I2) increased to 47%. In the D2-annealed α-Al2O3, the τ2 increased to 321 ps, with a intensity (I2) of 45%. For the T2-annealed and subsequently aged sample, the τ2 slightly increased to 323 ps, with the intensity (I2) increasing to 47%.


image file: c6ra00612d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Positron lifetime component τ2 (a) and corresponding intensity I2 (b) in different α-Al2O3 crystals: (1) fresh, (2) Ar-annealed, (3) D2-annealed and (4) T2-annealed and subsequently tritium-aged.

4. Discussion

4.1 The shorter lifetime component of α-Al2O3

The τ1 is generally due to the free annihilation of positrons in a defect-free crystal, denoted as the first lifetime of positrons.11,12 In a disordered system, smaller vacancies (such as monovacancies, etc.) or shallow positron traps (such as oxygen vacancies in oxides) may reduce the surrounding electron density,13 which increases the τ1 lifetime.

As shown in Fig. 2, the τ1 for the fresh sample was 111 ps, slightly shorter than the experimental values of the shorter lifetime, 117 ps in a single crystal,14 which could be ascribed to the inherent free positron lifetime in pristine α-Al2O3. However, the τ1 for the Ar-annealed sample was smaller at 108 ps, 3% smaller than in the fresh sample. Correspondingly, the relative intensity (I1) of the Ar-annealed sample decreased from 53% in the fresh sample to 52% (Fig. 2b). Therefore, the reduced τ1 of the fresh sample reflected that a few monovacancies in the α-Al2O3 lattice were incorporated or annihilated during the annealing of the sample in the Ar gas. It has been reported that the relative stability of intrinsic point defects in α-Al2O3 is VAl3− > VO0 > Oi2− > Ali3+ at the Fermi level under Al-rich conditions.6,15 Thus, τ1 of the Ar-annealed sample could be a mixed contribution from the annihilation of trapped positrons in VAl3− or VO0. Correspondingly, the reduction of τ1 could be caused by thermally-activated mutual annihilation of intrinsic point defects.16 This is a typical phenomenon of materials annealed at high temperature.

The prolonged τ1 of the D2-annealed sample (Fig. 2a) demonstrated that monovacancies were introduced into the α-Al2O3 lattice by the thermal hydrogenation. Correspondingly, the relative intensity (I1) of the D2-annealed sample also increased by 2% (Fig. 2b). Our DFT results suggested that Hi+, VAl3−, VO0 and Oi2− are likely to exist in the form of [VAl3−–H+]2−, HO+ and HOi, but also in isolated point defects under Al-rich conditions.6,17 In the thermal hydrogenation, HO+, due to H-trapping of VO0, cannot trap positrons efficiently, and the increase in positron lifetimes essentially points towards the generation or H-decoration of Al vacancies. Thus, the τ1 of the D2-annealed sample could be a mixed contribution from the annihilation of trapped positrons in VAl3−, [VAl3––H+]2− or VO0. Correspondingly, the increase of τ1, meaning that more monovacancies formed, demonstrated the stabilizing effect of hydrogen, in agreement with the reduction of the formation energies of VAl3− and [VAl3−–H+]2−; this is due to the Fermi level position of α-Al2O3 moving towards the conduction band minimum (CBM) in the presence of the H impurity (Fig. 3 in ref. 6), and thus VAl3− and [VAl3−–H+]2− become more stable.

The reduced τ1 of the T2-aged sample (Fig. 2a) demonstrated that a few of the Al monovacancies were filled by helium atoms. This was consistent with DFT results which indicated that He atoms preferentially occupy Al vacancies, centers of octahedral interstitial site (OIS) or form a dumbbell around Al vacancies, forming Hei, HeAl3−, Hei–HeAl3−, [VO0–Hei]0 and [Oi2−–He]2− complexes.7 During the tritium aging at room temperature, tritium being present as T+, TO+ and [VAl3−–T+]2− in α-Al2O3, [VO0–Hei]0, as a result of the trapped T from TO+ decaying, can trap positrons efficiently. The large increase in positron lifetimes essentially points towards the annihilation of Al vacancies, forming HeAl3− and [HeAl3–He]3−, due to the trapped T from [VAl3−–T+]2– decaying.

It is worth mentioning here that the shorter positron lifetime in α-Al2O3 is still a debatable issue, as is evident from the large spread in the values reported by several authors. G. Moya et al. have reported the lowest values of 117 and 122 ps for sintered and single crystal α-Al2O3 respectively,14 whereas values of 150 and 130 ps for single crystal α-Al2O3 were reported by G. Molnár18 and K. P. Muthe,19 respectively. A value of 110 ps was obtained in the present work.

In addition, the local configurations of VAl3− without and with H/He decoration are shown in Fig. 2a. A VAl3− has 6 O neighbours, all of which are equivalent by the cubic symmetry. A H+ can bind to one of these O atoms, pointing toward the vacancy centre and forming a [VAl3−–H+]2− complex with a fully relaxed O–H bond length of 0.98 Å. Thus, [VAl3−–H+]2− can trap positrons efficiently and, hence, the large increase in positron lifetimes was found. A He atom substitutes on the Al site, locating at the point equidistant from three oxygen atoms of the close-packed O layer above VAl3− and forming a HeAl3− complex. The distances between the He and the oxygen atoms are 2.084 Å. Upon adding a second He atom into HeAl3−, the 2nd He atom occupies the centre of the octahedral site along the c axis, forming a dumbbell with a He–He distance of 1.990 Å.7 Thus, the HeAl3− can decrease the positron lifetimes.

4.2 The longer lifetime component of α-Al2O3

The τ2 is attributed to positrons captured by defects of larger size.12 The average electron density in larger-sized defects, such as vacancy clusters, vacancy complexes and dislocations, is lower than that in small size defects, which decreases the annihilation rate and increases the positron lifetime correspondingly. Therefore, the values of τ2 are much larger than the values of τ1.

In the fresh α-Al2O3, the τ2 was 320 ps (Fig. 3a). This lifetime is comparable to those obtained in small vacancy clusters (300–500 ps), corresponding to irradiation-induced defects in single crystals after annealing at high temperatures.20 The lifetime of 359 ps corresponded to the annihilation of positrons at oxygen vacancies,21 whereas the lifetime of 310–340 ps was associated with the annihilation of positrons trapped in Al-related vacancies.14,18 Our DFT results show that the VAl3− and Schottky defects of {3VO1+[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]VAl3−} are dominant in pure α-Al2O3 under the Al-rich conditions.22 Thus, the lifetime (312–323 ps) measured for the α-Al2O3 was estimated to be due to mainly clusters and complexes of Al vacancies. Obviously, the larger-sized defects account for a smaller proportion than that of monovacancies in the fresh α-Al2O3, as I2 < I1.

For the Ar-annealed sample, the τ2 decreased to 313 ps due to annealing the sample in Ar gas (Fig. 3a), which demonstrated that clusters and complexes of Al vacancies were annihilated. This resulted from flock interaction between VAl3− and VO0 or their associates. There was a clear decrease in τav as shown in Fig. 4. τav decreased to 205 ps for the α-Al2O3 annealed in the Ar gas. Compared to the fresh α-Al2O3, the intensity of τ1 and τ2 for the Ar-annealed α-Al2O3 decreased and increased respectively, suggesting that Al monovacancies were predominately annihilated during the annealing of α-Al2O3 in the Ar gas.


image file: c6ra00612d-f4.tif
Fig. 4 The variation of average lifetime (τav) of positrons annihilated in the α-Al2O3 annealed in different conditions: (1) fresh, (2) Ar-annealed, (3) D2-annealed and (4) T2-annealed and subsequently tritium-aged.

In the D2-annealed α-Al2O3, the τ2 increased to 321 ps, with the intensity (I2) being 45% (Fig. 3); this demonstrated that hydrogenation induces the formation of some clusters or complexes of Al vacancies in the D2-annealed α-Al2O3, which resulted from the stabilizing effect of hydrogen. There was a clear increase in τav, as shown in Fig. 4. τav increased to 209 ps, revealing that the vacancy-type defects were generated. In contrast to the Ar-annealed α-Al2O3, the increased τ1 intensity and decreased τ2 intensity of the D2-annealed α-Al2O3 suggests that generation of Al monovacancies was preferred over the formation of clusters or complexes of Al vacancies.

For the T2-annealed and subsequently aged sample, the τ2 slightly increased to 323 ps because of tritium decay, with the intensity (I2) increasing to 47% (Fig. 3). This demonstrated that more larger-sized defects were introduced inside the T2-aged α-Al2O3, which may have resulted from disorder of the larger-sized defects, due to more and more helium atoms occupying them. There was a clear increase in τav, as shown in Fig. 4. τav continuously increased to 213 ps. Compared to the D2-annealed α-Al2O3, the decreased τ1 intensity and increased τ2 intensity suggested that Al vacancy clusters were predominately introduced as the α-Al2O3 aged in the tritium gas. As a result of such larger-sized defects forming, the Al–O bands of α-Al2O3 would be weakened and the lattice would even be disordered, hence one can assume that the mechanical performance of the α-Al2O3 would degenerate.

Fig. 5 shows the nano-hardness of α-Al2O3 annealed at 950 °C for 100 h in deuterium and in tritium with subsequent tritium aging. The nano-hardness of the fresh α-Al2O3 was 21.43 GPa. When the α-Al2O3 was annealed in the D2 gas, the nano-hardness decreased by 30% from 21.43 GPa to 15.3 GPa. The nano-hardness continuously decreased by 70% as the α-Al2O3 was annealed in tritium with subsequent aging for 1.5 years. Taking into consideration the clear increase of τav for the overall defects shown in Fig. 4, after tritium and helium atoms were introduced into α-Al2O3, one can assume that the hardness decrease could be caused by the weakening of the Al–O bands or even lattice disorder of the α-Al2O3. An uneven distribution of H/He-related defects would cause a stress concentration to be produced by an external load, which could also be the reason behind such a hardness decrease.


image file: c6ra00612d-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Nano-hardness of α-Al2O3 annealed at 950 °C for 100 h in different conditions: (1) fresh, (2) D2-annealed and (3) T2-annealed and subsequently tritium-aged.

5. Conclusions

α-Al2O3 single crystals were subjected to different anneals in pure Ar gas, D2 gas and T2 gas with subsequent tritium aging, and then they were investigated by positron annihilation spectroscopy to provide evidence for interactions of H and He with vacancy defects of α-Al2O3.

More monovacancies and vacancy clusters were formed in the thermally hydrogenated samples, due to the stabilizing effect of hydrogen when compared to the fresh sample and the sample annealed in pure Ar gas. This was consistent with H impurities leading to the Fermi level position of α-Al2O3 moving towards the conduction band minimum (CBM), observed by DFT calculations, and thus with VAl3− and [VAl3−–H+]2− becoming more stable. The monovacancies were slightly eliminated when a sample was annealed and then aged in T2 gas, which was consistent with He atoms preferentially filling Al vacancies, with HeAl3− formation, and more vacancy clusters being continuously induced. The results are an important complement to our understanding of the roles of hydrogen/helium in α-Al2O3 and in designing TPBs of oxide materials.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Science Program (No. 2013GB110006B) and National Natural Science Foundation (No. 21471137, 11275175) of China and the fund from Center for Fusion Energy Science Technology, CAEP (No. 2014-0304-03). We appreciate Dr Hua Luhui and Mr Jing Wenyong for PAS and tritium-annealed experiments.

Notes and references

  1. K. Hashizume, K. Ogata, M. Nishikawa, T. Tanabe, S. Abe, S. Akamaru and Y. Hatano, J. Nucl. Mater., 2013, 442, S880 CrossRef CAS.
  2. G. W. Hollenberg, E. P. Simonen, G. Kalinin and A. Terlain, Fusion Eng. Des., 1995, 28, 190 CrossRef CAS.
  3. A. Causey Rion, A. Karnesky Richard and S. Marchi Chris, Compr. Nucl. Mater., 2012, 4, 511 Search PubMed.
  4. X. Xiang, X. Wang, G. Zhang, T. Tang and X. Lai, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40, 3696 Search PubMed.
  5. K. Arshak and O. Korostynska, Mater. Sci. Eng., B, 2006, 133, 1 CrossRef CAS.
  6. G. Zhang, Y. Lu and X. L. Wang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 17523 RSC.
  7. G. Zhang, X. Xiang, F. Yang, X. Peng, T. Tang, Y. Shi and X. Wang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 1649 RSC.
  8. R. Ramírez, R. González, I. Colera and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 1997, 55, 237 CrossRef.
  9. R. Ramírez, I. Colera, R. González and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2004, 69, 14302 CrossRef.
  10. K. Rehberg and H. S. Leipner, Positron annihilation in semiconductors: defect studies, Springer, Berlin, 1999 Search PubMed.
  11. J. Kansy, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 1996, 374, 235 CrossRef CAS.
  12. D. Sanyal and D. Banerjee, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 1998, 58, 15226 CrossRef CAS.
  13. E. Lavrov, F. Herklotz and J. Weber, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2009, 102, 185502 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. G. Moya, J. Kansy, A. Si Ahmed, J. Liebault, F. Moya and D. Goeuriot, Phys. Status Solidi A, 2003, 198, 215 CrossRef CAS.
  15. M. Katsuyuki, T. Tomohito, Y. Takahisa and I. Yuichi, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2003, 68, 085110 CrossRef.
  16. J. Čížek, I. Procházka, J. Kuriplach, W. Anwand, G. Brauer, T. E. Cowan, D. Grambole, H. Schmidt and W. Skorupa, Defect Diffus. Forum, 2012, 331, 113 CrossRef.
  17. A. M. Holder, K. D. Osborn, C. J. Lobb and B. Charles, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2013, 111, 065901 CrossRef PubMed.
  18. G. Molnár, J. Borossay, M. Benabdesselam, P. Icconi, D. Lappaz, K. Süvegh and A. Vértes, Phys. Status Solidi A, 2000, 179, 245 CrossRef.
  19. K. P. Muthe, K. Sudarshan, P. K. Pujari, M. S. Kulkarni, N. S. Rawat, B. C. Bhatt and S. K. Gupta, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2009, 42, 105405 CrossRef.
  20. Y. Nagashima, K. Kawashima, T. Hyodo, M. Hasegawa, B. T. Lee, K. Hiraga, S. Yamaguchi, M. Forster and H. E. Schaefer, Mater. Sci. Forum, 1995, 461, 175 Search PubMed.
  21. M. L. Chithambo, E. J. Sendezera and A. T. Davidson, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 2002, 100, 269 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. X. Xiang, G. Zhang, X. Wang, T. Tang and Y. Shi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 29134 RSC.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.