Facile synthesis of cubical Co3O4 supported Au nanocomposites with high activity for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol

Yuwen Yang*a, Yongyun Maoa, Bin Wangb, Xianwei Menga, Jiao Hana, Chuan Wanga and Hongwei Yang*a
aState Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies for Comprehensive Utilization of Platinum Metals, Kunming Institute of Precious Metals, Kunming, 650106, China. E-mail: yywen@hotmail.com; yhw@ipm.com.cn
bState Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech. University, Nanjing, 210009, China

Received 4th January 2016 , Accepted 23rd March 2016

First published on 24th March 2016


Abstract

Cubic Co3O4 supported Au nanocomposites have been synthesized via a facile impregnation method. The Au/Co3O4 exhibited excellent catalytic activity for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol (TOF = 9.83 min−1). The unique structure and high catalytic performance make the materials highly promising candidates for diverse applications in the area of catalysis.


Noble metal nanostructures have attracted considerable attention because of their unique optical, catalytic, and electrochemical properties, which make them suitable materials in both fundamental and application research.1 In particular, gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) have been proven to have an important role in several catalytic processes, including the reduction of nitro-aromatic compounds,2 low-temperature CO oxidation,3 and organic synthesis.4 However, Au NPs are unstable and easy to aggregate due to their high surface energy, resulting in changes in the shape and size of the NPs during the reaction with the consequent decay in their original catalytic activity.5 Efforts have been made to control the aggregation of the Au NPs. For example, Au NPs catalysts with novel core–shell structure have been convinced to increase the dispersity of the Au NPs by uniformly encircling the surface of the core structure.6 Also, various substrates including reduced graphene oxide (RGO),7 silica,8 carbon nanotubes (CNT),9 metal oxides10 are successfully utilized to obtain catalysts with preferable dispersity. Among them, the incorporation of Au NPs and metal oxide supports provides a convincing strategy to hybrid heterogeneous catalysts for chemical transformation.11,12 It is reported that the synergistic interactions between Au NPs and metal oxide supports contribute to the catalytic activity.13 Recently, Co3O4, an important transition metal oxide, has drawn attention as readily available, high-surface-area supports in catalytic transformations.14 Therefore, Au NPs grown on Co3O4 is likely to lead to more efficient and more stable nanocatalysts.

4-Nitrophenol (4-NP) is one of the most common water pollutants with high toxicity and carcinogenic character.15 However, the reduced product, 4-aminophenol (4-AP) is of great importance in the preparation of various analgesic and antipyretic drugs.16 It is also used enormously as a photographic developer, dyeing agent, corrosion inhibiting agent, etc.17 Thus, the catalysts are the main factor for the reduction of 4-NP. Up to now, lots of noble13,18–26 and non-noble27–29 metals catalysts have been tested for 4-NP reduction, among which most of the catalysts with high performance are still remained considerable challenges. Therefore, development of highly effective and stable catalyst for the reduction of 4-NP under mild condition is highly desirable.

Several metal-loading methods have been reported including surface ion exchange technique,30 intermittent microwave irradiation (IMI),31 electrochemical deposition,32 etc. However, continuing efforts are underway to develop simple synthesis methods. In this work, the cubical Co3O4 supported Au nanocomposites (NCs) have been synthesized via a simple facile impregnation method. We have synthesized cubical Co3O4 in absence of any template, and then the cubical Co3O4 was used as supported for Au NPs to load. The as-prepared Au/Co3O4 NCs exhibited excellent catalytic activity for the reduction of 4-NP. The detailed experimental process could be found in the ESI.

The microstructure of the obtained samples was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM). As shown in Fig. 1a and b, the cubical Co3O4 nanocrystals were synthesized successfully with an average length of 20.4 nm (Fig. S1a). The TEM and HAADF-STEM images of Au/Co3O4 NCs (Fig. 1c and d) show that most of the Au NPs are well dispersed on the surface of cubical Co3O4 nanocrystals with the size of about 3.1 nm (Fig. S1b). A close examination of the catalysts by HRTEM (Fig. S2), the d-spacing of the particle lattice is ∼0.236 nm, which is consistent with the (111) plane of cubic Au (JCPDS no. 04-0784). The corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrum (Fig. 1e) proves the existence of the Au, Co elements. The phase structure and purity of Au/Co3O4 NCs were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Fig. 1f). The diffraction peaks (2θ) of Co3O4 at 19.0°, 31.2°, 36.8°, 38.5°, 55.7°, 59.4°, 65.2° are ascribed to the (111), (220), (311), (222), (400), (422), (544), (440) planes of pure Co3O4, which are consistent with the peak positions of Co3O4 in JCPDS card no. 42-1467. Similar diffraction peaks are also observed in the Au/Co3O4 NCs, indicating that the structures of Co3O4 were preserved. However, no characteristic peaks belong to Au can be observed in the XRD patterns which is probably due to the fact that the Au loading of Au/Co3O4 NCs is too low to fit the test limit of XRD detection. Moreover, the Au content in Au/Co3O4 NCs measured by using ICP analysis was 4.9 wt%, which was quite close to the initial amount of Au.


image file: c6ra00183a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 TEM images of (a and b) Co3O4, (c) Au/Co3O4; (d) HAAD-STEM image of Au/Co3O4; (e) EDX analysis for the marked area in (d); (f) powder X-ray diffraction patterns for Co3O4 and Au/Co3O4.

To better understand the composition of Au/Co3O4 NCs, we further carried out XPS analysis. Fig. S4 shows the XPS survey scan spectrum of Au/Co3O4 NCs. The survey scan spectrum reveals that Au is the only element detected except the Co3O4 elements (Co, O). This is well consistent with the EDX result. The high resolution Au 4f XPS spectrum shows two prominent peaks at 87.6 and 83.3 eV, which can be readily assigned to 4f5/2 and 4f7/2 of Au(0), respectively (Fig. 2a).33 Fig. 2b shows the peaks of Co 2p. The peak appeared at 780.1 eV for Co 2p3/2 and 795.9 eV for Co 2p1/2.34 The Co2+ peaks were observed at 797.3 and 781.7 eV, while the Co3+ peaks were observed at 795.4 and 779.8 eV. The peaks appeared at 786.0 and 802.7 eV were satellite peaks of Co2+. The Fig. 2c and d show the H2-TPR profiles of Co3O4 and Au/Co3O4. It can be found that the Co3O4 shows two reduction peaks, are at 305 °C and 363 °C, respectively. The first low temperature peak (α) can be ascribed to the reduction of Co3+ to Co2+, whereas the second high temperature peak (β) can be assigned to the reduction of Co2+ to Co0.35 However, the α and β peaks of Au/Co3O4 appeared at the higher temperature (347 °C and 449 °C) compared to Co3O4, indicating a much stronger interaction of Au with Co3O4 support in Au/Co3O4 NCs.


image file: c6ra00183a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 XPS spectra of Au/Co3O4 nanocomposites sample. (a) Au 4f, (b) Co 2p peaks; H2-TPR profiles for the (c) Co3O4 and (d) Au/Co3O4.

The catalytic performance of the as-synthesized cubical Co3O4 and Au/Co3O4 NCs were examined in the catalytic reduction of 4-NP in the presence of excess NaBH4 at room temperature. The reaction process was monitored by UV-vis spectrometry. As seen in Fig. 3a, pure 4-NP solution exhibits a strong absorption peak at 317 nm under neutral or acidic conditions, and its color is pale yellow. The adsorption peak of 4-NP immediately red shifts from 317 to 400 nm upon the addition of NaBH4 solution, and the color of the solution changed from pale yellow to bright yellow owing to the formation of 4-NP ion under the alkaline conditions. The reaction does not proceed for a couple of days even with a large excess of NaBH4 in the absence of the catalyst,36 this indicates that the use of NaBH4 alone did not affect the catalytic reaction. Fig. 3c shows the changes in the time-dependent UV-vis spectra during the catalyzed reduction of 4-NP by Au/Co3O4 NCs. It can be seen clearly from the spectra that the intensity of the absorbance band at 400 nm successively decreased as the reaction progressed and vanished within 10.7 min, while a new absorption peak at 300 nm appeared and increased. These results indicate the complete reduction of the –NO2 group of 4-NP to an –NH2 group. However, in the presence of the cubical Co3O4 nanocrystals (see Fig. 3b), only 12% reduction efficiency was observed after a reaction time of 15 min. The above results indicate that the Au/Co3O4 NCs exhibited considerably higher catalytic activity for the reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP with NaBH4 as the hydrogen donor, compared with the bare Co3O4 nanocrystals. The linear relationships between ln(Ct/C0) and the reaction time (t) are obtained in the reduction reaction catalyzed by the Au/Co3O4 NCs catalyst (Fig. 3d), where Ct and C0 are the 4-NP concentration at time t and 0, respectively. The catalytic reduction reaction conforms to the pseudo-first-order kinetics. The action rate constants k, calculated from the rate equation ln(Ct/C0) = kt, is 0.005 s−1. The turn over frequency (TOF) of Au/Co3O4 NCs catalyst is 9.83 min−1, calculated by the moles of 4-NP reduced per mole of Au per consumed time under the present reaction conditions. As shown in Table 1, in comparison with other Au based catalysts, Au/Co3O4 NCs catalyst showed a higher catalytic efficiency than most of other Au based catalysts for the reduction of 4-NP, such as Au/TiO2 (Au: 10.7 wt%),26 graphene/PDA-Au (Au: 3.2 wt%),7 etc. Although it showed a relatively lower value than SiO2@Fe3O4–C@Au18 and Fe3O4@SiO2-LBL-Au23 (Table 1), the Au/Co3O4 NCs catalyst has the advantages of simple synthetic procedure and mild preparation conditions. The recyclability of catalytic reduction was carried out for the Au/Co3O4 NCs for five successive cycles (Fig. S5). The catalytic activity of Au/Co3O4 NCs remained almost unchanged after running five cycles. The Au concentration in the filtrate after removing Au/Co3O4 NCs catalysts was measured to be 0.318 ppm by ICP, indicating that most of Au NPs still remain on Co3O4 after the cycle test. The good stability of the Au/Co3O4 NCs can be confirmed by TEM characterization. In contrast to the fresh synthesized Au/Co3O4 NCs sample, the TEM image of Au/Co3O4 NCs after five runs of durability test exhibits that the Au nanoparticles are still well dispersed on the Co3O4 and no obvious agglomeration is observed (see Fig. S6 of the ESI).


image file: c6ra00183a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 UV-vis spectra measured after various time periods, showing 4-nitrophenol reduction (a) with and without NaBH4; (b) in the presence of the Co3O4, and (c) in the presence of the Au/Co3O4. (d) Plots of ln(C0/Ct) against the reaction time of the reduction of 4-NP over Au/Co3O4 NCs.
Table 1 Comparison of catalytic activity by Au based nanocatalysts for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol
Catalysts 4-NP (μmol) Time (min) Au content (μmol) TOF (min−1) Ref.
SiO2@Fe3O4–C@Au 0.5 3.3 8.63 × 10−3 17.4 19
Fe3O4@SiO2-LBL-Au 0.5 15 2.48 × 10−3 13.4 23
Au/Co3O4 4 10.7 3.8 × 10−2 9.83 This work
Fe3O4@PDA-Au 0.85 19 1.09 × 10−2 4.1 13
Au-PMMA 1.35 10 8.8 × 10−2 1.53 20
Graphene/PDA-Au 1 13 2 × 10−1 0.38 7
Au/TiO2 0.3 16 0.26 × 103 0.34 26
Au/graphene 0.28 12 1.2 × 10−1 0.19 24
Fe3O4@SiO2–Au@mSiO2 0.5 15 3.35 × 10−1 0.1 22
Au@hollow silica 0.24 25 2 × 10−1 0.048 6
Au-ECCG-CF 1 30 1 0.033 18
Fe3O4–Au 0.4 10 1.9 0.02 21


The possible mechanism of catalytic reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP by NaBH4 on the Au/Co3O4 NCs is shown in Scheme 1.37 Based upon the obtained characteristic and catalytic results, we thus believe that the improved catalytic performance of this nanocomposite may be due to the chemical interaction between the Co3O4 nanocrystals and the Au NPs found by the H2-TPR measurement, increasing the rate of electron transfer across the interface of the Co3O4–Au. The fast electron transfer in turn can increase the local electron concentration and facilitate efficient electron transfer from the BH4 donor to the acceptor molecules of 4-NP through the nanocatalyst, and the reduction reaction was thus achieved with a superior catalytic activity.


image file: c6ra00183a-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Schematic illustration of the mechanism for catalytic reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP by the Au/Co3O4 NCs.

In summary, the cubical Co3O4 supported Au NCs have been synthesized successfully via a facile impregnation method. The as-prepared Au/Co3O4 NCs exhibited excellent catalytic activity for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol with a turn over frequency of 9.83 min−1 at room temperature, which was higher than most of the reported values for the same reaction using Au-based catalysts. The significant enhancement of the catalytic activity could be ascribed to the interaction between the cubical Co3O4 and Au nanostructures. The unique structure, durability and high catalytic performance make these materials highly promising candidates for diverse applications in the area of catalysis.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the NSFC (21363011) and the Project of NSF of Yunnan Province (2013FB094).

Notes and references

  1. T. K. Sau, A. L. Rogach, F. Jackel, T. A. Klar and J. Feldmann, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 1805–1825 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. J. John, E. Gravel, A. Hagege, H. Y. Li, T. Gacoin and E. Doris, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 123, 7675–7678 CrossRef.
  3. M. Haruta, N. Yamada, T. Kobayashi and S. Iijima, J. Catal., 1989, 115, 301–309 CrossRef CAS.
  4. G. J. Hutchings, Top. Catal., 2008, 48, 55–59 CrossRef CAS.
  5. Z. Jin, M. Xiao, Z. Bao, P. Wang and J. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 6406–6410 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. S. Wu, C. Tseng, Y. Lin, C. Lin, Y. Hung and C. Mou, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 789–794 RSC.
  7. J. Luo, N. Zhang, R. Liu and X. Y. Liu, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 64816–64824 RSC.
  8. J. Li, C. Liu and Y. Liu, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 8426–8430 RSC.
  9. C. Fernandes, C. Pereira, A. Guedes, S. L. H. Rebelo and C. Freire, Appl. Catal., A, 2014, 486, 150–158 CrossRef CAS.
  10. C. Chen, C. Y. Nan, D. S. Wang, Q. Su, H. H. Duan, X. W. Liu, L. S. Zhang, D. Chu, W. G. Song, Q. Peng and Y. D. Li, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 123, 3809–3813 CrossRef.
  11. B. Kong, J. Tang, C. Selomulya, W. Li, J. Wei, Y. Fang, Y. C. Wang, G. F. Zheng and D. Y. Zhao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 6822–6825 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. Z. Jin, M. D. Xiao, Z. H. Bao, P. Wang and J. F. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 1–6 CrossRef.
  13. T. Zeng, X. Zhang, H. Niu, Y. Ma, W. Li and Y. Cai, Appl. Catal., B, 2013, 134–135, 293–310 Search PubMed.
  14. L. Pan, J. Tang and F. W. Wang, Mater. Res. Bull., 2013, 48, 2648–2653 CrossRef CAS.
  15. S. Saha, A. Pal, S. Kundu, S. Basu and T. Pal, Langmuir, 2010, 26, 2885–2893 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. W. J. Liu, D. R. Sun, J. L. Fu, R. S. Yuan and Z. H. Li, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 11003–11011 RSC.
  17. R. Xiong, C. H. Lu, Y. R. Wang, Z. H. Zhou and X. X. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 14910–14918 CAS.
  18. H. Wu, X. Huang, M. Gao, X. Liao and B. Shi, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 651–658 RSC.
  19. T. Zeng, X. Zhang, S. Wang, Y. Ma, H. Niu and Y. Cai, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 11641–11647 CAS.
  20. K. Kuroda, T. Ishida and M. Haruta, J. Mol. Catal., 2009, 298, 7–11 CrossRef CAS.
  21. F. Lin and R. Doong, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 6591–6598 CAS.
  22. Y. Deng, Y. Cai, Z. Sun, J. Liu, C. Liu, J. Wei, W. Li, C. Liu, Y. Wang and D. Zhao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 8466–8473 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. Y. Zhu, J. Shen, K. Zhou, C. Chen, X. Yang and C. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 1614–1619 CAS.
  24. J. Li, C. Liu and Y. Liu, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 8426–8430 RSC.
  25. Y. Shi, X. L. Zhang, G. Feng, X. S. Chen and Z. H. Lu, Ceram. Int., 2015, 41, 14660–14667 CrossRef CAS.
  26. Y. G. Hao, X. K. Shao, B. X. Lin, L. Y. Hu and T. Wang, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process., 2015, 40, 621–630 CrossRef CAS.
  27. N. Sahiner, H. Ozay, O. Ozay and N. Aktas, Appl. Catal., B, 2010, 101, 137–143 CrossRef CAS.
  28. J. L. Yang, X. P. Shen, Z. Y. Ji, H. Zhou, G. X. Zhu and K. M. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 316, 575–581 CrossRef CAS.
  29. M. Nemanashi and R. Meijboom, Interface Sci., 2013, 389, 260–267 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. K. Yasuda and Y. Nishimura, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2003, 82, 921–928 CrossRef CAS.
  31. Z. Q. Tian, S. P. Jiang, Y. M. Liang and P. K. Shen, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 5343–5350 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. B. M. Quinn, C. Dekker and G. S. Lemay, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 6146–6147 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. Y. G. Hao, X. K. Shao, B. X. Lin, L. Y. Hu and T. Wang, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process., 2015, 40, 620–630 CrossRef.
  34. Y. Yamada, K. Yano, Q. Xu and S. Fukuzumi, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 16456–16462 CAS.
  35. W. J. Xue, X. Y. Zhang, P. Li, Z. T. Liu, Z. P. Hao and C. Y. Ma, Acta Physiol., 2011, 27, 1730–1736 CAS.
  36. R. Ma, Y. J. Kim, D. A. Reddy and T. K. Kimn, Ceram. Int., 2015, 41, 12432–12438 CrossRef CAS.
  37. X. D. Wu, C. H. Lu, Z. H. Zhou, G. P. Yuan, R. Xiong and X. X. Zhang, Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2014, 1, 71–79 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Materials, methods, ESI figures and table. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ra00183a

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.