Dehydrochlorination of polyvinylchloride using Al-modified graphitic-C3N4

Song Yi Baea, Seongho Jeona, Young Hoo Leea, Dong Hyun Leea, Hyoungsan Kyeb and Jong Wook Bae*a
aSchool of Chemical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 440-746, Republic of Korea. E-mail: finejw@skku.edu; Fax: +82-31-290-7272; Tel: +82-31-290-7347
bDepartment of Advanced Chemical Engineering, Mokwon University, Deajeon, 302-729, Republic of Korea

Received 19th November 2015 , Accepted 10th February 2016

First published on 11th February 2016


Abstract

One of the efficient chemical recycling processes for waste polyvinylchloride (PVC) is the dehydrochlorination reaction using an environmentally benign solvent such as polyethylene glycol. Hydrogen chloride (HCl) is simultaneously formed through the unzipping degradation mechanism of PVC due to its lower thermal stability, this causes severe corrosion problems for the operating equipment. For the dehydrochlorination of PVC, a novel graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) possessing a large amount of basic sites was prepared via melem-based thermal synthesis with an aluminum species structural modifier during the g-C3N4 preparation to verify the dehydrochlorination activity for PVC according to the aluminum content in the g-C3N4 matrix. The optimal 10 wt% aluminum modified g-C3N4 catalyst showed an excellent dehydrochlorination activity for PVC in an environmentally benign polyethylene glycol solvent due to the superior characteristics of the large amount of basic sites in g-C3N4. The positive effects of Al2O3 were mainly attributed to the incorporation of the structural modifier Al2O3 in the matrix of g-C3N4, where Al2O3 was a chemically inert material that enhanced the basicity of g-C3N4.


1. Introduction

Polyvinylchloride (PVC) is one of the general-purpose polymers, which can be produced on a large scale with a lower cost, and PVC also has superior physical and chemical properties with easy processing properties during the calendering or extrusion processes.1 Due to the excellent processing characteristics of PVC, it has been widely used for building timbers, household goods and so on. However, the lower thermal stability of PVC can lead to a well-known unzipping mechanism and yellowing phenomena during the manufacturing process that is responsible for the simultaneous production of hydrogen chloride (HCl), which also causes a severe corrosion problem for the equipment.2–4 Since the PVC resin has excellent mechanical properties and a strong chemical resistance with nonflammable characteristics, the production of PVC has been steadily increased and it has become one of the most widely consumed general-purpose polymers. Commercially, PVC has been synthesized through a polymerization reaction of vinylchloride monomer (C2H3Cl, VCM), which is produced from a thermal cracking reaction of dichloroethane (C2H4Cl2, DCE), producing an equal amount of HCl byproduct. Recently, the amount of global waste plastic has been dramatically increased due to the capacity saturation of the traditional waste disposal facilities such as landfill or incineration and so on. Therefore, some new disposal concepts for waste plastics through appropriate recycling technologies have been widely investigated to regenerate the waste plastics through physical or chemical recycling methods.3

Generally, the recycling technologies for the waste polymers can be categorized into three main methods. The material recycling method (MR) is to grind waste plastics physically followed by blending them for the preparation of recycled products.4 The chemical recycling method (CR) is to utilize appropriate reactions such as pyrolysis, chemical treatment, oxidation, or selective dehydrochlorination and so on to produce useful byproducts such as HCl and chemical intermediates with chlorinated hydrocarbons. The HCl product especially can be used after HCl purification for further transformations to Cl2 or for the oxidative chlorination of ethylene to DCE. Finally, the energy recycling method (EG) is to produce energy sources such as high pressure steam or electricity through the incineration of the waste plastics.1,3 Among these methods, the recycling method for waste PVC using CR has been highly attractive from the scientific point of view since the CR can efficiently recycle the waste PVC with the simultaneous production of HCl and useful chlorinated hydrocarbons under various reaction conditions.

Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has many potential applications such as in catalyst supporting materials and gas storage materials to substitute the amorphous or graphitic carbon materials due to its superior chemical and physical properties. In addition, g-C3N4 prepared using the melem-based synthesis has superior catalytic properties for fuel cell applications since g-C3N4 has a larger basic site density due to the incorporation of N atoms in the carbon nano-layers by the formation of C–N bonds in the form of aliphatic or aromatic structures.2,3,5–11 g-C3N4 can be synthesized using the polycondensation mechanisms of cyanamide, dicyandiamide or melamine,2,3,5–7 and some novel methods for the synthesis of g-C3N4 have been widely reported using mixtures of melamine and uric acid in the presence of alumina. In addition, environmentally benign solvents such as polyethylene glycols (PEGs), which have various and wide molecular weight distributions, and ionic liquids such as 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([Bmim]BF4) and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([Bmim]Cl) and so on12–15 have also been widely investigated for the dehydrochlorination of PVC.13,14,16–19

In the present study, a novel metal-free and Al-modified g-C3N4 (Al-g-C3N4) material was synthesized to verify the dehydrochlorination activity for virgin PVC resin in an environmentally benign PEG solvent. The different dehydrochlorination activity according to the concentration of aluminum species in the matrix of g-C3N4 was also investigated to verify the positive role of the basic sites on g-C3N4 through the characterization of the basic properties and physicochemical nature of the Al-modified g-C3N4.

2. Results and discussion

2.1. Characteristics of the Al-modified g-C3N4

The textural properties of the Al-modified g-C3N4 (Al-g-C3N4) were measured using a N2 adsorption–desorption method, and the BET surface area, pore volume and average pore diameter are summarized in Table 1. The yellowish Al-modified g-C3N4 was denoted as Al(x)-g-C3N4, where x represents the Al weight% based on the total weight of g-C3N4. With an increase of aluminum content in Al-g-C3N4, the surface area was slightly increased from 4.9 m2 g−1 for Al(0)-g-C3N4 to 7.4 m2 g−1 for Al(10)-g-C3N4. Interestingly, a significant increase of surface area was observed for Al(20)-g-C3N4 with a value of 45.6 m2 g−1. The pore volume showed a similar trend to the surface area with values of 0.041–0.085 cm3 g−1 and a large pore volume of 0.085 cm3 g−1 for Al(20)-g-C3N4. However, the average pore diameter was not significantly altered, showing values of 26.0–39.3 nm in size. The bimodal pore size distribution at around 3.5 and 20–70 nm was also observed, and it can possibly be induced by the insertion of aluminum heteroatoms between the flat nanosheet layers of g-C3N4 (ref. 5–8 and 11) forming the new larger mesopore above 50 nm. We believe that the significant changes of the structural properties of Al(20)-g-C3N4 can be attributed to the newly formed interparticular mesopores from the segregated Al2O3 particles on the surfaces of the g-C3N4 particles.9–11 The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and pore size distributions as shown in Fig. S1 and 1 strongly suggest the enlargement of the interlayer pores through the addition of the aluminum species in the matrix of g-C3N4, showing a typical type IV isotherm, especially for Al(20)-g-C3N4. Interestingly, the bimodal pore size distribution was observed at around 3.5 nm on all Al-g-C3N4 which can be attributed to the interlayer pores of g-C3N4. The observed pore diameter of 50–70 nm seems to be attributed to the segregated Al2O3 particles forming the interparticular pores, which was clearly observed on Al(10)-g-C3N4 forming a somewhat smaller mesopore at around 20–50 nm in size as shown in Fig. 1.
Table 1 Dehydrochlorination activities of the Al-modified g-C3N4
Catalysts N2 sorption Basicity (CO2-TPD, mmol CO2 per g) Activitya (removal%)
Surface area (m2 g−1) Pore volume (cm3 g−1) Average pore diameter (nm) <450 °C/>450 °C
a The dehydrochlorination activity was measured at T = 170 °C and ambient pressure for 6 h in a liquid-phase of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solvent with 0.05 g catalyst.b The removal% of HCl from the virgin PVC resin was measured at a reaction temperature of 200 °C.
None 51
Al(0)-g-C3N4 4.9 0.049 39.3 15.1/15.7 60
Al(5)-g-C3N4 6.3 0.041 26.0 93.3/112.0 63
Al(10)-g-C3N4 7.4 0.051 27.4 124.6/127.1 75 (88)b
Al(20)-g-C3N4 45.6 0.085 27.8 85.9/724.8 50



image file: c5ra24477c-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Pore size distribution of the fresh Al-modified g-C3N4.

The crystalline structures and phases of the Al-modified g-C3N4 were characterized using powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and the XRD patterns are displayed in Fig. 2. Two characteristic diffraction peaks of the crystalline g-C3N4 were clearly observed on the Al-modified g-C3N4, showing the well-known tri-s-triazine building blocks formed from the melem units.9–11 The observed larger peak intensity at around 2θ = 27.4° can be attributed to the characteristic interlayer stacking structures of the aromatic units which are assigned to the graphitic carbons of the (002) plane by localizing electrons with a stronger binding force between the g-C3N4 layers. In addition, the smaller peak intensity at around 2θ = 13.0° can be assigned to the (100) plane of g-C3N4, which is associated with the stacking of carbon interlayers.7,9,11 The intensities of the diffraction peaks were decreased with an increase of the aluminium content monotonically, showing the smallest intensity for Al(20)-g-C3N4 due to the possible collapse of the characteristic interlayer structure of g-C3N4 with its lower crystallinity. To further verify the results of the N2 adsorption–desorption and XRD analysis of the fresh Al-modified g-C3N4, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was carried out and the images are displayed in Fig. 3. From the TEM images, bundle-like structures on g-C3N4 (ref. 5 and 10) were clearly observed and sphere-like particles mixed with the g-C3N4 bundles were also observed after the aluminum modification during the synthesis of the Al-modified g-C3N4. This observation reveals that aluminum species with a size of 10–20 nm can be selectively formed in the interlayers of g-C3N4. These species seem to be responsible for the enhanced surface area of the Al-modified g-C3N4. The particle sizes of the sphere-type aluminum species were also found to be increased with an increase of the aluminum content in the Al-modified g-C3N4 by disrupting the characteristic interlayer structures of g-C3N4.


image file: c5ra24477c-f2.tif
Fig. 2 XRD patterns of the fresh Al-modified g-C3N4.

image file: c5ra24477c-f3.tif
Fig. 3 TEM images of the fresh Al-modified g-C3N4.

To elucidate the characteristic structures of the Al-modified g-C3N4, FT-IR analysis was carried out on the fresh Al-modified g-C3N4 and the FT-IR spectra are displayed in Fig. S2. The characteristic absorption bands of g-C3N4 were clearly observed and an absorption band at 1636 cm−1 was assigned to the C–N stretching vibration modes and those at 1247, 1329, and 1423 cm−1 were assigned to the C–N heterocycle stretching modes of g-C3N4. A broad absorption band at 3150 cm−1 can be assigned to the stretching modes of the terminal NH2 groups on the aromatic rings of g-C3N4.20–22 The characteristic peaks for metal oxides such as Al2O3 were also observed with absorption bands at 830 and 1050 cm−1.23 These results strongly suggest the easy formation of the g-C3N4 structures even after the aluminum modification of g-C3N4 and the chemical state of the aluminum species seems to be the metal oxide such as Al2O3 possibly with a high dispersion in the interlayer matrices of g-C3N4.

2.2. Dehydrochlorination activity for PVC in terms of the basicity of the Al-modified g-C3N4

The dehydrochlorination activities for virgin PVC on the Al-modified g-C3N4 under the reaction conditions of T = 170 °C and ambient pressure for 6 h in the PEG400 solvent are summarized in Table 1. Without the Al-modified g-C3N4 catalyst, the removal% of HCl from the PVC by the dehydrochlorination reaction was found to be the somewhat higher value of around 51% due to the facile thermal degradation activity of PVC by the well-known unzipping mechanism.1,4,13–19 Due to the intrinsic basic properties of g-C3N4, attributed to the terminal aliphatic or aromatic C–N structures,2,3,5–11 the dehydrochlorination activity of PVC was dramatically increased when in the presence of the Al-modified g-C3N4 catalyst up to 75% for Al(10)-g-C3N4 from 60% for Al(0)-g-C3N4 as summarized in Table 1. The preferential interactions of the Cl atoms on the surfaces of the PVC resin with the basic sites of Al-g-C3N4 seem to be responsible for the superior activity. In addition, the removal% of HCl from the PVC was further increased up to 88% for Al(10)-g-C3N4 at a reaction temperature of 200 °C. However, at the higher aluminum content of Al(20)-g-C3N4, the dehydrochlorination activity was decreased to 50% due to the less ordered crystalline-phase formation of g-C3N4 which possibly originated from the excess presence of Al2O3 particles and the simultaneous structural collapse of the characteristic interlayer structures of g-C3N4 as confirmed using the XRD and TEM analyses. In addition, the Al2O3 itself showed no significant enhancement of dehydrochlorination activity compared with the results of the no-catalyst experiment, which suggests that Al2O3 acts as a structural modifier in the matrix of g-C3N4, enhancing the basicity of g-C3N4. Therefore, the observed higher dehydrochlorination activity for Al(10)-g-C3N4 seems to be mainly attributed to the increased surface basic density with the enhanced crystalline structures of the interlayer structures of g-C3N4.

To further verify the oxidation states of the aluminum species and the basic properties of the Al-modified g-C3N4, XPS and CO2-TPD analyses were further carried out on the as-prepared Al-modified g-C3N4 and the spectra are displayed in Fig. 4 and S3, respectively. Based on the previous work,24 the binding energies (BE) of Al 2p for the metallic aluminum and γ-Al2O3 can be assigned to 72.5 and 74.0–74.5 eV, respectively. The BEs of the aluminum species on the Al-modified g-C3N4 were observed in the range of 73.8–74.8 eV with a small shoulder peak in the lower BE region. The BE of the aluminum species in the higher region was increased with the increase of aluminum content on the Al-modified g-C3N4. This observation suggests that the aluminum species on the Al-modified g-C3N4 exists mainly in the γ-Al2O3 phase irrespective of the amount of aluminum content in g-C3N4. The interaction between Al2O3 and g-C3N4 seems to be getting weaker with the increase of aluminum content in the matrix of the g-C3N4 as forming larger γ-Al2O3 particles resulted in a decrease of the basic sites which was supported through the BE shifts of Al 2p to higher values with the increase of aluminum content in the g-C3N4.9–11,25 To confirm the basic properties of the Al-modified g-C3N4, CO2-TPD analysis was carried out on the fresh Al-modified g-C3N4 and the desorption patterns are displayed in Fig. S3 with the summarized results in Table 1. In general, CO2 molecules can be adsorbed onto basic sites by forming monodentate carbonates in the temperature region below 200 °C and bidentate or bridged carbonates at the much higher temperature region of 250–650 °C on the basic sites or alumina surfaces.25–28 A small desorption peak was observed for all the Al-modified g-C3N4 at around 150 °C which was attributed to the basic sites of the g-C3N4 assigned to the monodentate carbonates. The strongly adsorbed CO2 molecules were observed at around 350 °C, strongly interacting with the basic sites of the g-C3N4 surfaces or with the segregated Al2O3 particles.27 These desorption peaks, which are denoted as the basic sites below 450 °C, seem to be the most active sites for the dehydrochlorination of PVC. The desorbed amount of CO2 was maximized on the most active Al(10)-g-C3N4 for the dehydrochlorination of PVC, and these values were found to be 15.1, 93.3, 124.6, and 85.9 mmol CO2 per g for Al(0)-g-C3N4, Al(5)-g-C3N4, Al(10)-g-C3N4, and Al(20)-g-C3N4, respectively. In addition, the broad CO2 desorption peak at the much higher temperature above 450 °C can be possibly attributed to the decomposition of g-C3N4. The desorption peak intensity above 450 °C was increased with an increase of the aluminum content in Al-g-C3N4 from 15.7 on Al(0)-g-C3N4 to 724.8 mmol CO2 per g on Al(20)-g-C3N4, which is possibly induced from the increased thermal degradation of the g-C3N4 structures with the help of the solid-acid Al2O3 particles especially at a high concentration of Al2O3 in the matrix of the g-C3N4.


image file: c5ra24477c-f4.tif
Fig. 4 XPS spectra of Al 2p on the fresh Al-modified g-C3N4.

In summary, the observed higher dehydrochlorination activity over Al(10)-g-C3N4 can be attributed to the larger number of active basic sites with the help of the structural modifier Al2O3 particles which are possibly inserted in the interlayers of the g-C3N4. The dehydrochlorination activity for PVC in an environmentally-benign PEG400 solvent is well correlated with the total amount of basic sites on the g-C3N4. The reaction mechanism was schematically proposed as summarized in Scheme 1. The intrinsic basic properties of g-C3N4 from the terminal aliphatic or aromatic C–N groups can initially attack the Cl atoms on the PVC surfaces. And the activated Cl atoms can selectively produce HCl by reacting with the adjacent H atoms on the PVC surfaces which results in the simultaneous formation of C[double bond, length as m-dash]C bonds. The structural modification of g-C3N4 with an optimal amount of Al2O3 can increase the basic properties without a significant loss of the crystallinity of g-C3N4 due to the highly dispersed Al2O3 particles in the interlayers of g-C3N4. Furthermore, the HCl produced by the dehydrochlorination of the PVC can be further utilized for an oxidative chlorination reaction of ethylene to dichloroethane in the PVC industry using an environmentally benign chemical recycling process of the waste PVC.


image file: c5ra24477c-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Proposed mechanism of the dehydrochlorination of PVC on the basic sites of the Al-modified g-C3N4.

3. Conclusions

A novel graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), having sufficient basic sites after modification with an optimal amount of aluminum, showed excellent dehydrochlorination activity in polyethylene glycol solvent at a lower temperature of 170 °C. The optimum concentration of Al2O3 in the g-C3N4 matrices was found to be around 10 wt%, which can enhance the surface area of the Al-modified g-C3N4 slightly by maximizing the amount of active basic sites and by increasing the terminal aliphatic or aromatic C–N groups of the g-C3N4. The dehydrochlorination of PVC seems to be selectively initiated by attack on the Cl atoms of PVC by the basic sites of g-C3N4, followed by the simultaneous production of HCl product by reaction of the Cl atoms with the adjacent H atoms to produce dehydrochlorinated C[double bond, length as m-dash]C bonds in the PVC resin. The structural modification of g-C3N4 with an appropriate amount of chemically inert Al2O3 can increase the number of basic sites with the help of the highly dispersed Al2O3 particles in the interlayers of the matrix of g-C3N4.

4. Experimental section

4.1. Preparation of g-C3N4 and the dehydrochlorination activity test

For preparing the Al-modified g-C3N4, aluminum isopropoxide (AIP) and melamine precursor, at a fixed weight of melamine (1.5 g) with a different weight of AIP, were completely mixed in 50 ml of 2-propanol solvent. The mixture was vigorously stirred at room temperature for 1 h, and the 2-propanol solvent was evaporated at 60 °C under vacuum conditions using a rotary evaporator. The prepared gel-like mixture was dried in an oven kept at 80 °C overnight, and the product was carburized by elevating the temperature to 250 °C and keeping for 0.5 h, 350 °C for 0.5 h, 550 °C for 4 h, and finally cooling down to room temperature under a flow of N2 with a ramping rate of 1 °C min−1. The as-prepared yellowish Al-modified g-C3N4 was denoted as Al(x)-g-C3N4, where x represents the Al metal weight% based on the weight of the g-C3N4 from 0 to 20 wt%.

For measuring the dehydrochlorination activity for the PVC resin, 35 ml of polyethylene glycol (PEG400, Aldrich) with a low molecular weight of 380–420 g mol−1, 1.0 g of PVC (Duksan Chem., Korea), and 0.05 g of the Al-modified g-C3N4 catalyst were added to and thoroughly mixed in a 3-neck round flask. The mixture was reacted at T = 170 °C at ambient pressure for 6 h. The extent of the dehydrochlorination of the PVC was measured using a titration method using NaOH solution, and the removal% of the HCl on the PVC resin was calculated by dividing the measured amounts of HCl by the titration with the theoretical amount of HCl in the virgin PVC resin.

4.2. Characterization of the Al-modified g-C3N4

N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were measured at −196 °C using a Micromeritics Tristar II instrument to verify the effects of aluminum species on the g-C3N4 porosity and surface area. Before analysis, the sample was treated under vacuum at 350 °C for 4 h under a He flow. The specific surface area of the Al-modified g-C3N4 was calculated using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method, and the pore volume, and the average pore diameter with a pore size distribution were also determined using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method using the data from the N2 desorption isotherm. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded using an X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα (λ = 0.15406 nm) irradiation in the range of 2θ = 10–60° to verify the crystalline structures of the Al-modified g-C3N4. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were also obtained using a TECNAI G2 T-20S instrument to confirm the morphology of the Al-modified g-C3N4.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was carried out using a VG Multilab 2000 instrument using a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source (1486.6 eV) to verify the electronic and oxidation states of the aluminum species in the Al-modified g-C3N4. The binding energy (BE) of aluminum was adjusted using the reference BE of C 1s of 284.6 eV.

Temperature-programmed desorption of CO2 (CO2-TPD) analysis on the Al-modified g-C3N4 was performed using a BELCAT-M instrument. Before analysis, the sample was pretreated at a He flow rate of 30 ml min−1 and 250 °C for 2 h, and it was then cooled down to 100 °C. The adsorption analysis of the adsorbed CO2 was subsequently carried out on the pretreated sample, and CO2-TPD patterns were obtained in the temperature range of 100–600 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1.

Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis was carried out to characterize the surface functional groups of the aluminum and g-C3N4 using a self-supported thin pellet of the fresh Al-modified g-C3N4 mixed with KBr.

Acknowledgements

The present work was financially supported by the R&D Center for Valuable Recycling (Global-Top R&D Program) of the Ministry of Environment of Korea (Project No. GT-14-C-01-038-0). The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (NRF-2014R1A1A2A16055557).

References

  1. D. Braun, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2002, 27, 2171–2195 CrossRef CAS.
  2. A. A. Stec, J. Readman, P. Blomqvist, D. Gylestam, D. Karlsson, D. Wojtalewicz and B. Z. Dlugogorski, Chemosphere, 2013, 90(1), 65–71 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. C. Jaksland, E. Rasmussen and T. Rohde, Waste Manage., 2000, 20, 463–467 CrossRef CAS.
  4. J. Kano, Q. Zhang, F. Saito, M. Baron and A. Nzihou, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 2006, 84, 309–312 CrossRef CAS.
  5. X. Wang, K. Maeda, K. Chen, K. Takanabe, K. Domen, Y. Hou, X. Fu and M. Antonietti, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 1680–1681 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. Y. Wang, X. Wang, M. Antonietti and Y. Zhang, ChemSusChem, 2010, 3, 435–439 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. S. C. Yan, Z. S. Li and Z. G. Zou, Langmuir, 2009, 25, 10397–10401 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. X. Wang, K. Maeda, A. Thomas, K. Takanabe, G. Xin, J. M. Carlsson, K. Domen and M. Antonietti, Nat. Mater., 2009, 8, 76–80 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. J. Xu, F. Wu, Q. Jiang and Y. X. Li, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 447–454 CAS.
  10. B. Chai, T. Peng, J. Mao, K. Li and L. Zan, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 16745–16752 RSC.
  11. A. Thomas, A. Fischer, F. Goettmann, M. Antonietti, J. O. Muller, R. Schlogl and J. M. Carlsson, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, 4893–4908 RSC.
  12. M. Rahman and C. S. Brazel, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 2006, 91, 3371–3382 CrossRef CAS.
  13. X. L. He, Q. Zhou, X. Y. Li, P. Yang, J. M. N. van Kasteren and Y. Z. Wang, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 2012, 97, 145–148 CrossRef CAS.
  14. T. Zhao, Q. Zhou, X. L. He, S. D. Wei, L. Wang, J. M. N. van Kasteren and Y. Z. Wang, Green Chem., 2010, 12, 1062–1065 RSC.
  15. D. Glas, J. Hulsbosch, P. Dubois, K. Binnemans and D. E. De Vos, ChemSusChem, 2014, 7, 610–617 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. Y. H. Wu, Q. Zhou, T. Zhao, M. L. Deng, J. Zhang and Y. Z. Wang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 163, 1408–1411 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. L. Guo, G. Shi, X. Du, C. Li and Y. Liang, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1998, 70, 2463–2469 CrossRef CAS.
  18. R. Bacaloglu and M. Fisch, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 1995, 47, 33–57 CrossRef CAS.
  19. T. Yoshioka, T. Kameda, S. Imai and A. Okuwaki, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 2008, 93, 1138–1141 CrossRef CAS.
  20. J. Liu, T. Zhang, Z. Wang, G. Dawson and W. Chen, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 14398–14401 RSC.
  21. J. X. Sun, Y. P. Yuan, L. G. Qiu, X. Jiang, A. J. Xie, Y. H. Shen and J. F. Zhu, Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 6756–6763 RSC.
  22. H. Yan and H. Yang, J. Alloys Compd., 2011, 509, L26–L29 CrossRef CAS.
  23. Y. J. Lee, M. H. Jung, J. B. Lee, K. E. Jeong, H. S. Roh, Y. W. Suh and J. W. Bae, Catal. Today, 2014, 228, 175–182 CrossRef CAS.
  24. C. D. Wagner, W. M. Riggs, L. E. Davis, J. F. Moulder and G. E. Muilenbegr, Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, 1979 Search PubMed.
  25. Q. Yang, W. Wang, Y. Zhao, J. Zhu, Y. Zhu and L. Wang, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 54978–54984 RSC.
  26. D. Dissanayake, K. C. C. Kharas, J. H. Lunsford and M. P. Rosynek, J. Catal., 1993, 139, 652–663 CrossRef CAS.
  27. A. R. Kim, H. Y. Lee, D. H. Lee, B. W. Kim, C. H. Chung, D. J. Moon, E. J. Jang, C. H. Pang and J. W. Bae, Energy Fuels, 2015, 29, 1055–1065 CAS.
  28. H. Y. Lee, A. R. Kim, M. J. Park, J. M. Jo, D. H. Lee and J. W. Bae, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 280, 771–781 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra24477c

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.