Synthesis, photophysics, ion detection and DFT investigation of novel cyano-substituted red-light chromophores with a triphenylamine donor

Na Sun, Peng Zhang* and Yanling Hou
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineer, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, PR China. E-mail: ybzhang@swu.edu.cn

Received 18th November 2015 , Accepted 12th January 2016

First published on 15th January 2016


Abstract

A series of novel triphenylamine-based red-light chromophores with multiple electron-withdrawing cyano substituents were synthesized by the Knoevenagel condensation reaction and characterized in detail. Compounds 3–5 showed bright green-yellow emission in dichloromethane solution and red-light emission in the solid state, respectively. The interesting solvatochromic behavior in different polar solvents was observed, varying from positive solvatochromism for compound 3 to negative solvatochromism for compound 5. In addition, the notable optical response of metal ions in DMF solution for the cyano-substituted chromophores was investigated. Especially, with the addition of Hg2+ ions, the blue shift in the absorption spectra and the decrease in the emission spectra suggested that the new metal complexes possibly formed between the cyano substituents and metal ions or metal ion-induced optical quenching happened. Density functional theory calculations were used to further understand the effect of the cyano substituents on the photoelectron properties of the donor–acceptor molecules.


Introduction

Since a PPV-based light-emitting diode (LED) was reported in 1990 by Burroughes and Friend, PPV derivatives, containing polymer molecules and oligo(phenylene vinylene), have attracted considerable attention due to their potential extensive applications, such as in organic light-emitting devices,1–3 solar photovoltaics,4,5 field-effect transistors and biochemical sensors,6,7 and so on. In the past decades, the remarkable progress in the design and development of organic photoelectron materials was made by regulating the π-conjugated systems or the side-chain substituents on the molecular backbone.8–11

Recently, triphenylamine (TPA) has widely been introduced in the design and preparation of organic photoelectron materials due to its strong electron-donating characteristic and modifiable molecular structure. Therefore, organic compounds with a donor–π-conjugated bridge–acceptor (D–π–A) structure have attracted considerable interest for their broad absorption from intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) in the visible region and their lower LUMO levels.12–15 For example, two star-shaped D–π–A molecules with TPA as the donor, dicyanovinyl as the acceptor, and 4,4′-dihexyl-2,2′-bithiophene or 4,4′-dihexyl-2,2′-bithiophene vinylene as the π-bridge reported by J. Zhang et al.16 possessed a broad absorption from 296 to 585 nm and a lower LUMO level of −3.42 eV. In addition, the optical properties of the molecules with electron-accepting and donating units could be easily tuned via controlling the extent of intramolecular charge transfer (ICT). Thus, introducing stronger electron-withdrawing groups was preferable to induce efficient ICT. The cyano group as a well-known strong electron acceptor has been widely used for red-light chromophores,17 which could promote efficient ICT and enhance the exciton dipole in the excited state.18–20 In particular, introducing multi-cyano groups into a conjugated system resulted in a stronger electron-accepting effect.21–23 So far, the TPA-based compounds with a D–π–A structure and multi-cyano groups as the electron acceptor have been reported. For example, the new TPA-based compounds with tetracyanoethylene groups reported by M. Grigoras showed board absorption over the solar spectrum,24 and were desirable candidates for bulk heterojunction and dye-sensitized solar cells. Y. Yang et al. reported the multi-branched TPA derivatives with dicyanovinyl as the electron acceptor, presenting outstanding solvatochromic behaviors.25 Besides, the optical probe of the TPA-based chromophores was recently reported as being due to the coordination of metal ions by cyano groups.26 Consequently, the introduction of cyano substituents on the TPA-based derivatives could finely tune the electron energy levels.

In this report, the synthesis, photophysical performances and electron structures of novel D–π–A molecules with TPA as the donor, cyano groups as the acceptor, and ethynylbenzene units as the π-conjugated linkage were investigated systematically. Cyano substituents on the conjugated system could facilitate tuning of the optical properties. These compounds are red-emitting in the solid state as expected, and possess a broad visible absorption band. Furthermore, theoretical calculation was performed to further understand the effect of the cyano substituents on the TPA-based molecules on the optical properties.

Experimental section

Materials

Triphenylamine (TPA), potassium tert-butoxide (t-BuOK), N-bromosuccinimide (NBS), CuCN, malononitrile, and metal salts (Hg(CH3COO)2, SnCl2·2H2O, and so on) are commercial products from Aldrich and were directly used without further purification. Solvents such as triethylamine, dimethylformamide (DMF), phosphorus oxychloride (POCl3) and tetrahydrofuran (THF) were purchased from commercial sources. Compound 1,4-dibromo-2,5-bis(diphenylaminophenyl) benzene (1) was synthesized according to the reported literature.27

General characterization

1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz spectrometer. ESI-TOF MS data were obtained from a Bruker esquire 2000 mass system. The infrared (IR) spectra were measured on a Shimadzu FTIR-8400 spectrometer with KBr pellets. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was carried out on an XD-3 powder diffractometer (Purkinje General Instrument Co., Beijing, China). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were observed by an S4800 (Hitachi, Japan) at 20 kV. The thermal behaviors of these compounds were analyzed with a TA SDTQ600 thermal gravimetric analyzer (USA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, model 200F3-Maia, Germany) under a dry nitrogen gas flow at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption and emission spectra in solution, a thin film and powder were performed on a UV-2550 spectrometer (Shimadzu, Japan) and F-7000 fluorescence spectrometer (Hitachi, Japan). The fluorescence quantum yield of these compounds in different polar solvents at room temperature was recorded using a FL-TCSPC time resolved fluorescence spectrometer (Horiba, Jobin Yvon Inc, France). The luminescence decay lifetimes were recorded using a fluorescence lifetime spectrometer (FL-TCSPC, Horiba, Jobin Yvon Inc, France). Cyclic voltammetry was recorded on a CHI-660D electrochemical workstation (Chenghua Co., China) with platinum wire as the counter electrode, Pt as the working electrode and a saturated calomel electrode as the reference electrode. Theoretical calculation was performed with time dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT, B3LYP/6-31G (d)) on the Gaussian 09 quantum chemical program package.

Synthesis of triphenylamine-malononitrile derivatives 2–5

4,4((((1E,1′E)-2,5-Dibromo-1,4-phenylene)bis(ethene-2,1-diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))-bis(phenylazanediyl))dibenzaldehyde (compound 2). POCl3 (2.4 mL, 25.75 mmol) was dropwise added at 0 °C to 1,4-dibromo-2,5-bis(diphenylamino-phenyl)benzene (1.6 g, 2.06 mmol) in dry DMF solution, and the mixture was heated and kept at 90 °C for 12 h. Then POCl3 (1.2 mL, 12.88 mmol) was added again and reacted for 12 h. After the reaction, the mixture was cooled to room temperature, poured into ice water, and neutralized with aqueous 2 M NaOH solution in turn. And then the solvent was removed under a reduced pressure. The residue was washed with distilled water and separated by column chromatography (silica gel, petroleum ether/EtOAc, 6[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, v/v). Finally, the product was obtained as a yellow powder (1.43 g, 83% yield). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 9.84 (s, 2H), 7.87 (s, 2H), 7.72 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 4H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 7.38–7.35 (m, 4H), 7.33 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 2H), 7.2–7.19 (m, 6H), 7.17 (d, J = 9 Hz, 4H), 7.10 (d, J = 6 Hz, 4H), 7.05 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 2H). ESI-TOF MS: calcd for C48H34Br2N2O2 828.1; found: 828.5. (Scheme 1)
image file: c5ra24341f-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Synthetic routes for compounds 3–5.
2,5-Bis(4-((4-formylphenyl) (phenyl)amino)styryl)terephthalonitrile (compound 3). A mixture of compound 2 (0.5 g, 0.6 mmol), and CuCN (0.14 g, 1.5 mmol) was dissolved in 50 mL DMF under nitrogen atmosphere and stirred at 155 °C for 48 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature (RT), poured into water, filtered, and washed with ammonia (15%) and water in turn. And then, the residue was purified with column chromatography (silica gel, petroleum ether/EtOAc, 6[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, v/v). Finally, compound 3 was obtained as a yellow powder (0.32 g, 73% yield). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 9.88 (s, 2H), 8.05 (s, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 7.57 (d, J = 9 Hz, 4H), 7.42–7.39 (m, 4H), 7.32 (d, J = 6 Hz, 4H), 7.22 (d, J = 6 Hz, 2H), 7.21–7.2 (m, 8H), 7.15 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 190.4, 152.7, 147.5, 145.9, 138.9, 134.2, 131.5, 131.3, 130.2, 130.0, 129.7, 128.7, 126.6, 125.6, 125.2, 121.1, 120.9, 116.6, 114.9. ESI-TOF MS: calcd for C50H34N4O2 722.2; found: 722.7. FT-IR (KBr): ν (cm−1): 3032 ([double bond, length as m-dash]C–H), 2221 (–C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N), 1686 (C[double bond, length as m-dash]O), 1585, 1581 (C[double bond, length as m-dash]C), 1285 (C–N), 1319, 1165 (C–CN), 964, 822, 698 (C–H).
2,2′-(4,4′-(4,4′-(1E,1′E)-2,2′-(2,5-Dicyano-1,4-phenylene)bis(ethene-2,1diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(phenylazanediyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(methan-1-yl-1-ylidene) dimalononitrile (compound 4). To compound 3 (0.32 g, 0.44 mmol) in anhydrous DCM (30 mL) was added malononitrile (0.64 g, 0.97 mmol) at RT and 5 drops of triethylamine were added. After being stirred for 24 h at RT, the reaction mixtures were concentrated and purified with column chromatography (silica gel, petroleum ether/EtOAc, 6[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, v/v) to obtain compound 4 as a red powder (0.25 g, 69% yield). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 7.91 (s, 2H), 7.80 (d, J = 3 Hz, 4H), 7.58 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 7.56 (s, 2H), 7.44–7.42 (m, 4H), 7.38 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 2H), 7.24–7.21 (m, 6H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 7.06 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (d, J = 9 Hz, 4H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 157.8, 152.8, 146.4, 145.0, 134.1, 132.9, 130.2, 129.8, 128.8, 128.7, 128.5, 126.9, 126.5, 126.2, 126.0, 123.8, 121.8, 119.8, 119.5, 115.1, 113.8. ESI-TOF MS: calcd for C56H34N8 818.2; found: 817.7. FT-IR (KBr): ν (cm−1): 3032 ([double bond, length as m-dash]C–H), 2218 (–C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N), 1568, 1500, 1323 (C[double bond, length as m-dash]C), 1292 (C–N), 1184 ([double bond, length as m-dash]C–CN), 960, 822, 694 (C–H).
2,2′-(4,4′-(4,4′-(1E,1′E)-2,2′-(2,5-Dibromo-1,4-phenylene)bis(ethene-2,1-diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(phenylazanediyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(methan-1-yl-1-ylidene) dimalononitrile (compound 5). To a solution of compound 2 (0.5 g, 0.6 mmol) in anhydrous DCM (30 mL) was added malononitrile (0.87 g, 1.32 mmol) at RT to which was added 8 drops triethylamine. After being stirred at 24 h at RT, the reaction mixtures were concentrated and purified with column chromatography (silica gel, petroleum ether/EtOAc, 6[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, v/v) to yield compound 5 as a red powder (0.38 g, 68% yield). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 7.91 (s, 2H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 7.58 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 4H), 7.57 (s, 2H), 7.44–7.42 (m, 4H), 7.38 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 2H), 7.24–7.21 (m, 6H), 7.23 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 4H), 7.06 (d, J = 9 Hz, 4H), 7.05 (d, J = 6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 157.8, 153.1, 145.4, 145.1, 137.4, 134.1, 133.0, 131.2, 130.4, 130.1, 128.4, 126.8, 126.4, 126.3, 126.0, 123.4, 123.1, 119.3, 115.0, 113.9. ESI-TOF MS: calcd for C54H34Br2N6 922.1; found: 921.6. FT-IR (KBr): ν (cm−1): 3032 ([double bond, length as m-dash]C–H), 2218 (–C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N), 1566, 1497, 1323 (C[double bond, length as m-dash]C), 1296 (C–N), 1184 ([double bond, length as m-dash]C–CN), 1053, 814, 694 (C–H).

Results and discussion

Thermal properties and morphology

In order to evaluate the thermal properties of compounds 3–5, thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere and the corresponding data are summarized in Table 1. As shown in Fig. S1, the TGA results exhibited that the degradation temperatures (Td) of compounds 3–5 were 350 °C, 390 °C and 390 °C (5% weight loss), respectively, and the higher degradation temperatures of compounds 4 and 5 were attributed to multi-cyano end substitutes which resulted in a strong intramolecular interaction. It demonstrated that the thermal stability of the compounds was regulated by the amount and position of the cyano substituents. In addition, DSC (Fig. S2) analysis indicated that the compounds only showed a relatively weak endothermic step-transition in the scanning region, which could be attributed to the glass phase transition. The glass transition temperature of compounds 3–5 was 111 °C, 116 °C and 108 °C, respectively. From the above data it is obvious that the cyano-substituted compounds have a certain amorphous characteristic.
Table 1 The photophysical data and thermal properties of compounds 3–5
Compound λabs/nm (sol) λem/nm (sol) λabs/nm (film) λem/nm (film) λem/nm (solid) Tg/°C Td/°C τa/ns
a Luminescence decay lifetimes of compounds 3–5 were measured in dichloromethane solution.
3 439 542 458 572 576 111 350 2.68
4 469 557 497 609 619 116 390 1.58
5 463 539 522 608 623 108 390 1.86


In order to further evaluate the morphological nature of the compounds in the solid state, the morphology investigations have been performed using powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. As shown in Fig. S3, a series of sharp peaks for compound 3 were observed due to the restriction in the molecular ordered aggregation and crystallinity by the terminal aldehyde groups.28 Meanwhile, compound 4 shows a sharper peak, which demonstrated that end multi-cyano substituted molecules showed a crystallization tendency in the solid state. However, compound 5 displays a series of more intensive peaks, compared to those of the first two compounds, demonstrating the difference in the crystal phase or intermolecular interaction in the solid state. Furthermore, the XRD profile of compound 4 shows one strong peak (d = 1.022 nm) in the small-angle region except for several weak peaks in the wide-angle region (Fig. S3). Compound 3 exhibits similar XRD profiles, which consist of one strong peak (d = 0.883 nm) in the small-angle region and a series of relatively strong peaks in the wide-angle region, indicating the similar packing mode of compound 4. In contrast, the XRD profile of compound 5 exhibits a series of relatively strong peaks in the small- and wide-angle regions, with one strongest peak in the small-angle region (d = 1.061 nm) and wide-angle region (d = 0.408 nm), respectively.

Photophysical properties

The UV-vis absorption and photoluminescence spectra of compounds 3–5 in dichloromethane solution are displayed in Fig. 1 and the corresponding photophysical data are summarized in Table 1. All novel synthesized chromophores, containing two electron-donating TPA terminals and a bis(styryl)benzene backbone, presented two distinct absorption bands around 260 nm and 470 nm. The absorption around 260 nm was attributed to a π–π* or n–π* transition on the TPA donor, while the absorption around 470 nm was assigned to the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) from the TPA donor to the centre bis(styryl)benzene backbone acceptor except for the contribution of the cyano substituents. In addition, it should be noted that a weak absorption at about 320 nm was observed for the compounds, probably due to the combined effect of the π–π* transition of the molecular backbones and the electron-withdrawing cyano substituents on the TPA parts.29
image file: c5ra24341f-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Normalized UV-vis absorption and emission spectra of compounds 3–5 in dichloromethane solution (1 × 10−5 M).

In addition, the absorption spectra of the compounds show a red shift compared with those of their TPA-based analogues without cyano substituents reported in the literature (410 nm).30 The lower energy absorption band for compound 3 was around 439 nm. Compounds 4 and 5 presented a more remarkable red shift in the absorption maximum than compound 3 (30 nm and 24 nm, respectively), probably attributed to the stronger influence of the cyano substituent on the terminal TPA parts in comparison with those on the center benzene ring. All of the compounds displayed a relatively strong green-light emission in solution. An obvious red shift emission of compound 4 was attributed to the combined effect of the cyano substituents on different benzene rings compared with compounds 3 and 5. In addition, compounds 4 and 5 showed lower PL quantum efficiencies, which suggested that the effect of the terminal cyano substituents on the TPA units may result in more non-radiative transitions of the compounds (Table 1).

Compared with the UV-vis absorption and emission spectra in solution, compounds 3–5 in the thin film exhibited a larger red shift, and broad and structureless absorption bands, demonstrating strong intermolecular π–π* interaction or aggregation in the solid state (Fig. 2). Compound 3 showed bright orange fluorescence (572 nm) in the thin film, while compounds 4 and 5 showed red emission at 609 and 608 nm in the thin film. In addition, red fluorescence for compounds 4 and 5 was observed at 619 and 623 nm in the powder state, respectively, indicating a more remarkable red shift, which demonstrated a much stronger intermolecular π–π* interaction or aggregation in the powder state than in the film (Fig. S4 and S5).


image file: c5ra24341f-f2.tif
Fig. 2 UV-vis absorption and PL emission spectra of compounds 3–5 in the thin film.

Moreover, the concentration dependence of the emission of the compounds in dichloromethane solution was also investigated (Fig. 3 and S6). As shown in Fig. 3, the emission spectra of compound 5 shows a notable red shift except for the concentration quenching on increasing the solution concentration. It demonstrated that the intermolecular π–π* interaction or aggregation was present in a high solution concentration.


image file: c5ra24341f-f3.tif
Fig. 3 The concentration dependence of the emission spectra of compound 5 in dichloromethane solution (mol L−1).

The solvatochromism of the novel red compounds was assessed in different polar solvents. As shown in Fig. S7, the absorption maxima of these TPA derivatives showed a slightly negative solvatochromism with the increase of solvent polarities. In other words, compound 3 exhibited a blue shifted absorption with increasing the solvent polarity, shorter wavelength absorption maxima in DMF (435 nm) and a longer wavelength in TOL (445 nm) (Table 2). Similarly, compounds 4 and 5 showed red shifted absorption maxima in non-polar TOL solvent (464 and 458 nm) and blue shifted absorption maxima in polar DMF solvent (460 and 436 nm), respectively. The results suggested that the dipole moment of the molecules in the excited state was decreased due to the effect of the electron-withdrawing cyano substituents.

Table 2 Data of optical properties of compounds 3–5 in different polarity solvents
Solvent 3 4 5
λabs/nm λem/nm Δν/cm−1 ΦFa/% λabs/nm λem/nm Δν/cm−1 ΦFa/% λabs/nm λem/nm Δν/cm−1 ΦFa/%
a Absolute quantum yields ΦF were determined in the absorption maximum (10−6 M L−1) corresponding to the solvents.
Toluene 445 515 3054 0.765 464 544 3169 0.171 458 560 3977 0.069
CH2Cl2 439 542 4329 0.732 469 556 3336 0.014 463 539 3045 0.01
THF 437 538 4296 0.703 462 543 3229 0.017 456 524 2846 0.012
EA 434 535 4350 0.707 459 557 3833 0.018 455 535 3286 0.012
DMF 435 556 5003 0.619 460 559 3850 0.28 436 545 4587 0.16


Furthermore, the emission solvatochromism of the compounds was examined with the increase of solvent polarity from a non-polar solvent (toluene) to a polar solvent (DMF) (Fig. 4 and S8). Interestingly, varying from a non-polar solvent to a polar solvent, the emission spectra of compound 3 show a progressive red shift (515 nm in TOL solutions and 556 nm in DMF solutions) and emission broadening (Fig. 4a), indicating that the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) occurred in the excited state from the electron donor to the electron acceptor. However, compound 4 only shows a weaker positive solvatochromism with the increase of solvent polarity. This suggested that the combined effect of the cyano substituents on the different positions weakened the ICT abilities in the excited state (Fig. 4b). In contrast, compound 5 indicated an obviously negative solvatochromism, with a blue shift of 36 nm as the solvent polarity varied from a non-polar solvent to a polar solvent (Fig. 4c). The result implied that the solvent polarity-induced distortion of the molecular planarity restricted the intramolecular charge transfer transition, resulting in the blue shift emission.31


image file: c5ra24341f-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Normalized emission spectra of compounds 3–5 in different polar solvents and solvatochromic shift.

The linear variety of the Stokes shift of compounds 3–5 to the Lippert–Mataga solvent polarity parameter, Δf,32 is plotted in Fig. 4d. Compound 3 showed an obvious increase of Stokes shift along with an increase of Δf, suggesting that it had a strong ICT characteristic in the excited state. For compound 4, the fit line relationship between the Stokes shift and Δf has a comparably gentle slope and exhibited a slight deviation in the experimental data. This suggested that compound 4 underwent a small dipolar change in the excited process from a non-polar to polar solvent. In contrast, the slope value of the line relationship for compound 5 was negative, which demonstrated that compound 5 had a negative solvatochromism. In other words, the ICT character of compounds 3–5 could be tuned by the terminal cyano groups.

The fluorescence quantum yields (ΦF) of compounds 3–5 were studied in different solvents to get a deep understanding of the solvatochromism behavior. ΦF of compound 3 was observed to be as high as 0.765 in the low polar solvent of toluene (Table 2), and gradually decreased with the increase in polarity, indicating that a strong solvent polarity could result in an increase in the non-radiative transition. However, compounds 4 and 5 exhibited a relatively higher ΦF in high polar solvents, while only a lower ΦF was observed in a non-polar solvent, demonstrating that the cyano substituents on the TPA units were not bad for ΦF.

The luminescence decay lifetimes of compounds 3–5 were measured in dichloromethane solution (Table 1). Compound 3 (2.68 ns) exhibited a relatively higher luminescence decay lifetime than that of compounds 4 and 5 (1.58 ns and 1.86 ns), demonstrating that introducing the cyano substituents to the TPA units led to an enhanced ICT character which changes the decay of the singlet excited states. Actually, the high strength ICT led to the increase of intramolecular rotation and the distortion which increased the energy loss of the non-radiative transition, and thus the luminescence decay lifetime was decreased.

Metal ion detection

The cyano substituents on the compounds were able to form a coordination complex with the metal ions.33 Therefore, in order to explore the potential application of these compounds, the effect of the addition of metal ions on the optical properties of compounds 3–5 was recorded in DMF solution (Fig. S9–S11). The results indicated that the presence of the metal ions, including Ba2+, Co2+, Cr3+, Cu2+, Hg2+, Pb2+, Sn2+ and Zn2+, could cause the change in the absorption and emission spectra, deviating from the initial positions. Compounds 4 and 5 showed a hypsochromic shift in the absorption spectra to a certain extent and an increase or a decrease in the emission spectra with the addition of metal ions.

The metal ion Hg2+ was chosen as an example to further assess the influence of metal ions on the absorption and emission spectra of compounds 3–5. The concentration of compounds 3–5 was fixed at 1 × 10−5 M L−1 and the metal ion concentration varied from 1 × 10−4 to 9 × 10−4 M L−1. The UV-vis absorption and PL spectra were recorded immediately after the addition of metal ions (Fig. 5 and S12). The absorption and emission maximum of compound 3 in DMF solution only displayed a gradual decrease without a notable red shift with the addition of Hg2+ up to the concentration of 9 × 10−4 mol L−1, which may be attributed to the Hg2+ ion-induced decrease in the ICT band.


image file: c5ra24341f-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Absorption spectra of compounds 3–5 in DMF (1 × 10−5 M L−1) with the addition of Hg2+in DMF solution (1 × 10−4 M L−1).

In the case of cyano-substituted TPA derivatives, the absorption spectra of compounds 4 and 5 show a remarkable hypsochromic shift and a new peak appeared at around 330 nm after Hg2+ ions were added. Simultaneously, with increasing the Hg2+ ions, the peak intensity of the absorption spectra decreased. The results may be attributed to a result of ICT between the electron-withdrawing cyano and electron-donating TPA units induced by Hg2+ ions, or to the new coordinative complex possibly formed between the cyano groups and Hg2+ ions. In addition, the presence of Hg2+ ions had a certain influence on the emission intensity, which presented firstly an increase, and then a decrease as the Hg2+ ions increased.

Electrochemical properties

The electrochemical behaviors of compounds 3–5 were studied using cyclic voltammetry (CV) in dimethylformamide (DMF) in the presence of tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (TBAP) as a supporting electrolyte (Fig. 6, Table 3 and Table S1 in the ESI). The CV curves of the compounds exhibit an irreversible oxidation process in the positive scanning region and several successive irreversible reduction processes in the negative scanning region, which were assigned to the oxidation of the TPA units and the reduction of the combination of the conjugated distyrylbenzene core and cyano substituents, respectively. The anodic scanning shows an onset oxidation potential of 0.97 V for compound 3, 0.99 V for compound 4 and 0.96 V for compound 5. In contrast, compounds 3–5 show an onset reduction potential of −1.38, −1.30 and −1.36 V, respectively. According to equations reported in the literature,34 the energy levels of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), and the electrochemical band gap (Eg) of compound 3 were estimated to be −5.67, −3.32 and 2.35 eV, respectively. Similarly, for compound 5, the HOMO, the deeper LUMO and the corresponding Eg were obtained at −5.66 eV, 3.34 eV and 2.32 eV, respectively. Meanwhile compound 4 possessed deeper HOMO (−5.69 eV) and LUMO (−3.40 eV) levels, resulting in a narrower band gap (2.29 eV), due to the presence of more electron-withdrawing cyano substituents on the TPA parts. The electrochemical band gaps of compounds 3–5 were in agreement with the optical measurements. Consequently, the electron structures of the synthesized compounds succeeded in being fine-tuned by the cyano substituent on the TPA-based derivatives.
image file: c5ra24341f-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Cyclic voltammetry of compounds 3–5 in DMF solution at a scanning rate of 100 mV s−1.
Table 3 The electrochemical data and energy levels of compounds 3–5
Compound CV/V Energya/eV − exp Eoptgb
Eox/onset Ered/onset EHOMO ELUMO Eg
a Electronic structures were determined from the formula: EHOMO = −(Eox + 4.7) (eV) and ELUMO = −(Ered + 4.7) (eV).b Eoptg = 1240/λ (absorption band edge).
3 0.97 −1.38 −5.67 −3.32 2.35 2.37
4 0.99 −1.30 −5.69 −3.40 2.29 2.15
5 0.96 −1.36 −5.66 −3.34 2.32 2.15


DFT investigation

In order to further clarify the experimental results, the space geometries of compounds 3–5 were optimized as shown in Table 4, and the corresponding parameters are summarized in Table 5. Compounds 3–5 showed a slight twist along the conjugated distyrylbenzene skeleton, respectively (Table 5). The small twist dihedral angles along C5–C6–C9–C10 and C9–C10–C19–C20 for compound 3 were 2.20° and 2.67°, respectively. Meanwhile compound 4 presented smaller twist dihedral angles (1.10° and 2.01°) along C5–C6–C9–C10 and C9–C10–C19–C20 due to the combined influences of the cyano substituents in the middle and terminal regions. Interestingly, larger twist dihedral angles along C5–C6–C7–C8 and C16–C15–C8–C7 for the terminal cyano-substituted compound 5 were 13.93° and 5.57°, in agreement with the optical characteristics. Moreover, the three phenyl rings on the TPA group displayed different twist dihedral angles to each other. The twist dihedral angles among the three rings on TPA decreased from −73.80° to −79.64° along C23–C24–C26–C28 (for compounds 3 and 4) or C19–C20–C22–C24 (for compound 5). Meanwhile the twist dihedral angles increased from −63.10° to −61.26° along C21–C24–C32–C35 (for compounds 3 and 4) or C17–C20–C28–C31 (for compound 5) and −71.24° to −67.80° along C27–C26–C32–C33 (for compounds 3 and 4) or C23–C22–C28–C29 (for compound 5), respectively. Similar alteration in the plane angle for compounds 3–5 is given in Table 5. Thus, such varieties further confirmed the effect of the electron-withdrawing cyano substituents on the molecular space geometries.
Table 4 The electronic structure data by the theoretical calculation of compounds 3–5
Compound EHOMO ELUMO Steric structure
3 image file: c5ra24341f-u1.tif image file: c5ra24341f-u2.tif image file: c5ra24341f-u3.tif
4 image file: c5ra24341f-u4.tif image file: c5ra24341f-u5.tif image file: c5ra24341f-u6.tif
5 image file: c5ra24341f-u7.tif image file: c5ra24341f-u8.tif image file: c5ra24341f-u9.tif


Table 5 Optimized geometry parameters of bond lengths, bond angles and dihedral angles for compounds 3–5 (bond lengths are in Å, and bond angles and dihedral angles are in degrees)
3 4 5
Bond length
O39–C38 1.22 N92–C90 1.16 C86–N88 1.16
C38–C37 1.47 C90–C89 1.43 C86–C85 1.43
C32–N25 1.41 C89–C38 1.37 C85–C34 1.37
C26–N25 1.43 C38–C37 1.44 C34–C33 1.44
C24–N25 1.42 C32–N25 1.40 C28–N21 1.40
C10–C19 1.46 C26–N25 1.43 C22–N21 1.43
C9–C10 1.35 C24–N25 1.42 C20–N21 1.42
C6–C9 1.46 C10–C19 1.46 C15–C8 1.46
C2–C7 1.43 C9–C10 1.35 C8–C7 1.35
C7–N8 1.16 C6–C9 1.46 C7–C6 1.46
    C2–C7 1.43 C2–Br95 1.92
    C7–N8 1.16    
[thin space (1/6-em)]
Bond angle
O39–C38–C37 124.91 C90–C89–C38 125.18 C86–C85–C84 125.18
C24–N25–C26 119.01 C89–C38–C37 131.70 C34–C33–C32 117.33
C26–N25–C32 119.75 C24–N25–C26 118.34 C20–N21–C22 118.24
C24–N25–C32 121.24 C26–N25–C32 120.09 C22–N21–C28 120.40
C9–C10–C19 126.95 C24–N25–C32 121.57 C20–N21–C28 121.36
C6–C9–C10 126.40 C9–C10–C19 126.87 C7–C8–C15 126.72
    C6–C9–C10 126.38 C6–C7–C8 126.04
[thin space (1/6-em)]
Dihedral angle
C23–C24–C26–C28 −73.80 C23–C24–C26–C28 −78.71 C19–C20–C22–C24 −79.64
C21–C24–C32–C35 −63.10 C21–C24–C32–C35 −61.26 C17–C20–C28–C31 −62.31
C27–C26–C32–C33 −71.24 C27–C26–C32–C33 −69.32 C23–C22–C28–C29 −67.80
C9–C10–C19–C20 2.67 C9–C10–C19– C20 2.01 C16–C15–C8–C7 5.57
C5–C6–C9–C10 2.20 C5–C6–C9–C10 1.10 C5–C6–C7–C8 13.93


The HOMO and LUMO for compounds 3–5 are reported in Table 4. The HOMO was delocalized over the entire molecule, while the LUMO was mainly localized on the center conjugated moieties through the π-bridge. In addition, the LUMO for compounds 4 and 5 extended the terminal substituted cyano branches on the TPA moieties. Especially, for compound 5, the terminal substituted cyano group presented a stronger influence on the LUMO, which further verified that the charge distribution on such molecules was extremely influenced by the terminal cyano groups. The results would lead to the difference in the photophysical properties among compounds 3–5 when the intramolecular charge transfer happened during an excited process.

The HOMO energy levels (EHOMO) and LUMO energy levels (ELUMO) are estimated in Table 4. EHOMO and ELUMO for compound 3 were −5.28 and −3.01 eV, respectively. Introducing the electron-withdrawing cyano group on the benzene ring resulted in a remarkably low ELUMO with an increasing number of cyano groups. Compared with compound 3, introducing dicyanovinyl arms on the TPA parts for compound 4 resulted in lower EHOMO and ELUMO energies. However, in comparison with compound 4, compound 5 exhibited a slight increase in EHOMO and ELUMO due to the absence of cyano substituents on the phenyl core, which was in agreement with the electrochemical experiment. In other words, the cyano substituents on the TPA-based derivatives could finely regulate the electron structures, resulting in the red-light properties.

Conclusions

In this work, three new TPA-based chromophores with electron-withdrawing cyano substituents were synthesized. Their relevant characterizations were performed by TGA, DSC, UV-vis, PL spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. Compounds 3–5 showed bright green-yellow emission in dichloromethane solution and red-light emission in the solid state, respectively. Interestingly, compounds 3 and 4 showed a significant positive solvatochromism and a weaker positive solvatochromism with increasing the polarity of the solvent, respectively, while a negative solvatochromism for compound 5 was observed, due to the effect of terminal cyano substituents. Furthermore, the compounds showed an optical response to metal ions. Especially, with a change of Hg2+ concentration, the blue shift in the absorption spectra and the decrease in the emission intensity demonstrated that the compounds were potential materials for highly selective and sensitive optical sensors. The electrochemical characterization and DFT calculation validated the fine regulation in the HOMO and LUMO from the variety of cyano substituents. In addition, DFT calculation revealed the essence that the cyano substituents regulated the photophysical properties, electrochemical characteristics and electron structures of the donor–acceptor molecules.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XDJK2015C020) for the financial support.

Notes and references

  1. X. Zhang, B. Chen, X. Lin, O. Wong, C. Lee, H. Kwong, S. Lee and S. Wu, Chem. Mater., 2001, 13, 1565–1569 CrossRef CAS.
  2. C. Y. B. Ng, K. H. Yeoh, T. J. Whitcher, N. A. Talik, K. L. Woon, T. Saisopa, H. Nakajima, R. Supruangnet and P. Songsiriritthigul, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2014, 47, 015106 CrossRef.
  3. M. Belhaj, C. Dridi and H. Elhouichet, J. Lumin., 2015, 157, 53–57 CrossRef CAS.
  4. J. Huang, C. Li, Y. J. Xia, X. H. Zhu, J. Peng and Y. Cao, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 8580–8583 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. N. Tamoto, C. Adachi and K. Nagai, Chem. Mater., 1997, 9, 1077–1085 CrossRef CAS.
  6. T. Lei, X. Xia, J. Y. Wang, C. J. Liu and J. Pei, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 2135–2141 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. D. Zhao, J. Du, Y. Chen, X. Ji, Z. He and W. Chan, Macromolecules, 2008, 41, 5373–5378 CrossRef CAS.
  8. E. Cevik, D. İlicali, D. A. M. Egbe and S. Günes, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2012, 98, 94–102 CrossRef CAS.
  9. B. Stender, S. F. Völker, C. Lambert and J. Pflaum, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 2943–2947 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. A. G. Del Mauro and M. GraziaáMaglione, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2015, 3, 147–152 RSC.
  11. S. T. Iacono, S. M. Budy, J. D. Moody, R. C. Smith and D. W. Smith Jr, Macromolecules, 2008, 41, 7490–7496 CrossRef CAS.
  12. X. Mei, G. Wen, J. Wang, H. Yao, Y. Zhao, Z. Lin and Q. Ling, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2015, 3, 7267–7271 RSC.
  13. M. Aydemir, G. Haykır, F. Türksoy, S. Gümüş, F. B. Diasa and A. P. Monkman, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 25572–25582 RSC.
  14. S. H. Kim, J. Choi, C. Sakong, J. W. Namgoong, W. Lee, D. H. Kim, B. Kim, M. J. Ko and J. P. Kim, Dyes Pigm., 2015, 113, 390–401 CrossRef CAS.
  15. F. Wu, S. Zhao, L. T. L. Lee, M. Wang, T. Chen and L. Zhu, Tetrahedron Lett., 2015, 56, 1233–1238 CrossRef CAS.
  16. J. Zhang, D. Deng, C. He, Y. He, M. J. Zhang, Z. G. Zhang, Z. J. Zhang and Y. F. Li, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 817–822 CrossRef CAS.
  17. X. Liu, Z. Cao, H. Huang, X. Liu, Y. Tan, H. Chen, Y. Pei and S. Tan, J. Power Sources, 2014, 248, 400–406 CrossRef CAS.
  18. Z. M. Ju, H. L. Jia, X. H. Ju, X. F. Zhou, Z. Q. Shi, H. G. Zheng and M. D. Zhang, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 3720–3727 RSC.
  19. Z. G. Zhang, Y. Yang, S. Zhang, J. Min, J. Zhang, M. Zhang, X. Guo and Y. Li, Synth. Met., 2011, 161, 1383–1389 CrossRef CAS.
  20. X. Tang, W. Liu, J. Wu, C. S. Lee, J. You and P. Wang, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 7273–7278 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. V. Jeux, O. Segut, D. Demeter, O. Alévêque, P. Leriche and J. Roncali, ChemPlusChem, 2015, 80, 697–703 CrossRef CAS.
  22. F. Tancini, Y. L. Wu, W. B. Schweizer, J. P. Gisselbrecht, C. Boudon, P. D. Jarowski, M. T. Beels, I. Biaggio and F. Diederich, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2012, 2756–2765 CrossRef CAS.
  23. W. Huang, F. Tang, B. Li, J. Sua and H. Tian, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2014, 2, 1141–1148 RSC.
  24. M. Grigoras, T. Ivan, L. Vacareanu, A. M. Catargiu and R. Tigoianu, J. Lumin., 2014, 153, 5–11 CrossRef CAS.
  25. Y. Yang, B. Li and L. Zhang, Sens. Actuators, B, 2013, 183, 46–51 CrossRef CAS.
  26. W. Shi, F. Ma, Y. Hui, H. Mi, Y. Tian, Y. Lei and Z. Xie, Dyes Pigm., 2014, 104, 1–7 CrossRef CAS.
  27. P. Liu, P. Zhang, D. Cao, L. Gan and Y. Li, J. Mol. Struct., 2013, 1050, 151–158 CrossRef CAS.
  28. Q. Fang and T. Yamamoto, Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 5894–5899 CrossRef CAS.
  29. D. S. Leem, K. H. Lee, K. B. Park, S. J. Lim, K. S. Kim, Y. Wan Jin and S. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2013, 103, 043305 CrossRef.
  30. L. Dong, G. Li, A. D. Yu, Z. Bo, C. L. Liu and W. C. Chen, Chem.–Asian J., 2014, 9, 3403–3407 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. E. C. H. Kwok, D. P. K. Tsang, M. Y. Chan and V. W. W. Yam, Chem.–Eur. J., 2013, 19, 2757–2767 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. S. Y. Kim, Y. J. Cho, G. F. Jin, W. S. Han, H. J. Son, D. W. Cho and S. O. Kang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 15679–15682 RSC.
  33. L. Vacareanu, I. Teofilia and M. Grigoras, Macromol. Res., 2013, 21, 1059–1068 CrossRef CAS.
  34. L. Liu, H. Li, J. Bian, J. Qian, Y. Wei, J. Li and W. Tian, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, 5009–5017 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Electrochemical parameters, thermal properties, solid morphology, photophysical properties, and metal ion detection of the compounds. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra24341f

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.