Na Sun,
Peng Zhang* and
Yanling Hou
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineer, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, PR China. E-mail: ybzhang@swu.edu.cn
First published on 15th January 2016
A series of novel triphenylamine-based red-light chromophores with multiple electron-withdrawing cyano substituents were synthesized by the Knoevenagel condensation reaction and characterized in detail. Compounds 3–5 showed bright green-yellow emission in dichloromethane solution and red-light emission in the solid state, respectively. The interesting solvatochromic behavior in different polar solvents was observed, varying from positive solvatochromism for compound 3 to negative solvatochromism for compound 5. In addition, the notable optical response of metal ions in DMF solution for the cyano-substituted chromophores was investigated. Especially, with the addition of Hg2+ ions, the blue shift in the absorption spectra and the decrease in the emission spectra suggested that the new metal complexes possibly formed between the cyano substituents and metal ions or metal ion-induced optical quenching happened. Density functional theory calculations were used to further understand the effect of the cyano substituents on the photoelectron properties of the donor–acceptor molecules.
Recently, triphenylamine (TPA) has widely been introduced in the design and preparation of organic photoelectron materials due to its strong electron-donating characteristic and modifiable molecular structure. Therefore, organic compounds with a donor–π-conjugated bridge–acceptor (D–π–A) structure have attracted considerable interest for their broad absorption from intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) in the visible region and their lower LUMO levels.12–15 For example, two star-shaped D–π–A molecules with TPA as the donor, dicyanovinyl as the acceptor, and 4,4′-dihexyl-2,2′-bithiophene or 4,4′-dihexyl-2,2′-bithiophene vinylene as the π-bridge reported by J. Zhang et al.16 possessed a broad absorption from 296 to 585 nm and a lower LUMO level of −3.42 eV. In addition, the optical properties of the molecules with electron-accepting and donating units could be easily tuned via controlling the extent of intramolecular charge transfer (ICT). Thus, introducing stronger electron-withdrawing groups was preferable to induce efficient ICT. The cyano group as a well-known strong electron acceptor has been widely used for red-light chromophores,17 which could promote efficient ICT and enhance the exciton dipole in the excited state.18–20 In particular, introducing multi-cyano groups into a conjugated system resulted in a stronger electron-accepting effect.21–23 So far, the TPA-based compounds with a D–π–A structure and multi-cyano groups as the electron acceptor have been reported. For example, the new TPA-based compounds with tetracyanoethylene groups reported by M. Grigoras showed board absorption over the solar spectrum,24 and were desirable candidates for bulk heterojunction and dye-sensitized solar cells. Y. Yang et al. reported the multi-branched TPA derivatives with dicyanovinyl as the electron acceptor, presenting outstanding solvatochromic behaviors.25 Besides, the optical probe of the TPA-based chromophores was recently reported as being due to the coordination of metal ions by cyano groups.26 Consequently, the introduction of cyano substituents on the TPA-based derivatives could finely tune the electron energy levels.
In this report, the synthesis, photophysical performances and electron structures of novel D–π–A molecules with TPA as the donor, cyano groups as the acceptor, and ethynylbenzene units as the π-conjugated linkage were investigated systematically. Cyano substituents on the conjugated system could facilitate tuning of the optical properties. These compounds are red-emitting in the solid state as expected, and possess a broad visible absorption band. Furthermore, theoretical calculation was performed to further understand the effect of the cyano substituents on the TPA-based molecules on the optical properties.
:
1, v/v). Finally, the product was obtained as a yellow powder (1.43 g, 83% yield). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 9.84 (s, 2H), 7.87 (s, 2H), 7.72 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 4H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 7.38–7.35 (m, 4H), 7.33 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 2H), 7.2–7.19 (m, 6H), 7.17 (d, J = 9 Hz, 4H), 7.10 (d, J = 6 Hz, 4H), 7.05 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 2H). ESI-TOF MS: calcd for C48H34Br2N2O2 828.1; found: 828.5. (Scheme 1)
:
1, v/v). Finally, compound 3 was obtained as a yellow powder (0.32 g, 73% yield). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 9.88 (s, 2H), 8.05 (s, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 7.57 (d, J = 9 Hz, 4H), 7.42–7.39 (m, 4H), 7.32 (d, J = 6 Hz, 4H), 7.22 (d, J = 6 Hz, 2H), 7.21–7.2 (m, 8H), 7.15 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 190.4, 152.7, 147.5, 145.9, 138.9, 134.2, 131.5, 131.3, 130.2, 130.0, 129.7, 128.7, 126.6, 125.6, 125.2, 121.1, 120.9, 116.6, 114.9. ESI-TOF MS: calcd for C50H34N4O2 722.2; found: 722.7. FT-IR (KBr): ν (cm−1): 3032 (
C–H), 2221 (–C
N), 1686 (C
O), 1585, 1581 (C
C), 1285 (C–N), 1319, 1165 (C–CN), 964, 822, 698 (C–H).
:
1, v/v) to obtain compound 4 as a red powder (0.25 g, 69% yield). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 7.91 (s, 2H), 7.80 (d, J = 3 Hz, 4H), 7.58 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 7.56 (s, 2H), 7.44–7.42 (m, 4H), 7.38 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 2H), 7.24–7.21 (m, 6H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 7.06 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (d, J = 9 Hz, 4H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 157.8, 152.8, 146.4, 145.0, 134.1, 132.9, 130.2, 129.8, 128.8, 128.7, 128.5, 126.9, 126.5, 126.2, 126.0, 123.8, 121.8, 119.8, 119.5, 115.1, 113.8. ESI-TOF MS: calcd for C56H34N8 818.2; found: 817.7. FT-IR (KBr): ν (cm−1): 3032 (
C–H), 2218 (–C
N), 1568, 1500, 1323 (C
C), 1292 (C–N), 1184 (
C–CN), 960, 822, 694 (C–H).
:
1, v/v) to yield compound 5 as a red powder (0.38 g, 68% yield). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 7.91 (s, 2H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 7.58 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 4H), 7.57 (s, 2H), 7.44–7.42 (m, 4H), 7.38 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 2H), 7.24–7.21 (m, 6H), 7.23 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 4H), 7.06 (d, J = 9 Hz, 4H), 7.05 (d, J = 6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 157.8, 153.1, 145.4, 145.1, 137.4, 134.1, 133.0, 131.2, 130.4, 130.1, 128.4, 126.8, 126.4, 126.3, 126.0, 123.4, 123.1, 119.3, 115.0, 113.9. ESI-TOF MS: calcd for C54H34Br2N6 922.1; found: 921.6. FT-IR (KBr): ν (cm−1): 3032 (
C–H), 2218 (–C
N), 1566, 1497, 1323 (C
C), 1296 (C–N), 1184 (
C–CN), 1053, 814, 694 (C–H).In order to further evaluate the morphological nature of the compounds in the solid state, the morphology investigations have been performed using powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. As shown in Fig. S3,† a series of sharp peaks for compound 3 were observed due to the restriction in the molecular ordered aggregation and crystallinity by the terminal aldehyde groups.28 Meanwhile, compound 4 shows a sharper peak, which demonstrated that end multi-cyano substituted molecules showed a crystallization tendency in the solid state. However, compound 5 displays a series of more intensive peaks, compared to those of the first two compounds, demonstrating the difference in the crystal phase or intermolecular interaction in the solid state. Furthermore, the XRD profile of compound 4 shows one strong peak (d = 1.022 nm) in the small-angle region except for several weak peaks in the wide-angle region (Fig. S3†). Compound 3 exhibits similar XRD profiles, which consist of one strong peak (d = 0.883 nm) in the small-angle region and a series of relatively strong peaks in the wide-angle region, indicating the similar packing mode of compound 4. In contrast, the XRD profile of compound 5 exhibits a series of relatively strong peaks in the small- and wide-angle regions, with one strongest peak in the small-angle region (d = 1.061 nm) and wide-angle region (d = 0.408 nm), respectively.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 1 Normalized UV-vis absorption and emission spectra of compounds 3–5 in dichloromethane solution (1 × 10−5 M). | ||
In addition, the absorption spectra of the compounds show a red shift compared with those of their TPA-based analogues without cyano substituents reported in the literature (410 nm).30 The lower energy absorption band for compound 3 was around 439 nm. Compounds 4 and 5 presented a more remarkable red shift in the absorption maximum than compound 3 (30 nm and 24 nm, respectively), probably attributed to the stronger influence of the cyano substituent on the terminal TPA parts in comparison with those on the center benzene ring. All of the compounds displayed a relatively strong green-light emission in solution. An obvious red shift emission of compound 4 was attributed to the combined effect of the cyano substituents on different benzene rings compared with compounds 3 and 5. In addition, compounds 4 and 5 showed lower PL quantum efficiencies, which suggested that the effect of the terminal cyano substituents on the TPA units may result in more non-radiative transitions of the compounds (Table 1).
Compared with the UV-vis absorption and emission spectra in solution, compounds 3–5 in the thin film exhibited a larger red shift, and broad and structureless absorption bands, demonstrating strong intermolecular π–π* interaction or aggregation in the solid state (Fig. 2). Compound 3 showed bright orange fluorescence (572 nm) in the thin film, while compounds 4 and 5 showed red emission at 609 and 608 nm in the thin film. In addition, red fluorescence for compounds 4 and 5 was observed at 619 and 623 nm in the powder state, respectively, indicating a more remarkable red shift, which demonstrated a much stronger intermolecular π–π* interaction or aggregation in the powder state than in the film (Fig. S4 and S5†).
Moreover, the concentration dependence of the emission of the compounds in dichloromethane solution was also investigated (Fig. 3 and S6†). As shown in Fig. 3, the emission spectra of compound 5 shows a notable red shift except for the concentration quenching on increasing the solution concentration. It demonstrated that the intermolecular π–π* interaction or aggregation was present in a high solution concentration.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 3 The concentration dependence of the emission spectra of compound 5 in dichloromethane solution (mol L−1). | ||
The solvatochromism of the novel red compounds was assessed in different polar solvents. As shown in Fig. S7,† the absorption maxima of these TPA derivatives showed a slightly negative solvatochromism with the increase of solvent polarities. In other words, compound 3 exhibited a blue shifted absorption with increasing the solvent polarity, shorter wavelength absorption maxima in DMF (435 nm) and a longer wavelength in TOL (445 nm) (Table 2). Similarly, compounds 4 and 5 showed red shifted absorption maxima in non-polar TOL solvent (464 and 458 nm) and blue shifted absorption maxima in polar DMF solvent (460 and 436 nm), respectively. The results suggested that the dipole moment of the molecules in the excited state was decreased due to the effect of the electron-withdrawing cyano substituents.
| Solvent | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| λabs/nm | λem/nm | Δν/cm−1 | ΦFa/% | λabs/nm | λem/nm | Δν/cm−1 | ΦFa/% | λabs/nm | λem/nm | Δν/cm−1 | ΦFa/% | |
| a Absolute quantum yields ΦF were determined in the absorption maximum (10−6 M L−1) corresponding to the solvents. | ||||||||||||
| Toluene | 445 | 515 | 3054 | 0.765 | 464 | 544 | 3169 | 0.171 | 458 | 560 | 3977 | 0.069 |
| CH2Cl2 | 439 | 542 | 4329 | 0.732 | 469 | 556 | 3336 | 0.014 | 463 | 539 | 3045 | 0.01 |
| THF | 437 | 538 | 4296 | 0.703 | 462 | 543 | 3229 | 0.017 | 456 | 524 | 2846 | 0.012 |
| EA | 434 | 535 | 4350 | 0.707 | 459 | 557 | 3833 | 0.018 | 455 | 535 | 3286 | 0.012 |
| DMF | 435 | 556 | 5003 | 0.619 | 460 | 559 | 3850 | 0.28 | 436 | 545 | 4587 | 0.16 |
Furthermore, the emission solvatochromism of the compounds was examined with the increase of solvent polarity from a non-polar solvent (toluene) to a polar solvent (DMF) (Fig. 4 and S8†). Interestingly, varying from a non-polar solvent to a polar solvent, the emission spectra of compound 3 show a progressive red shift (515 nm in TOL solutions and 556 nm in DMF solutions) and emission broadening (Fig. 4a), indicating that the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) occurred in the excited state from the electron donor to the electron acceptor. However, compound 4 only shows a weaker positive solvatochromism with the increase of solvent polarity. This suggested that the combined effect of the cyano substituents on the different positions weakened the ICT abilities in the excited state (Fig. 4b). In contrast, compound 5 indicated an obviously negative solvatochromism, with a blue shift of 36 nm as the solvent polarity varied from a non-polar solvent to a polar solvent (Fig. 4c). The result implied that the solvent polarity-induced distortion of the molecular planarity restricted the intramolecular charge transfer transition, resulting in the blue shift emission.31
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 Normalized emission spectra of compounds 3–5 in different polar solvents and solvatochromic shift. | ||
The linear variety of the Stokes shift of compounds 3–5 to the Lippert–Mataga solvent polarity parameter, Δf,32 is plotted in Fig. 4d. Compound 3 showed an obvious increase of Stokes shift along with an increase of Δf, suggesting that it had a strong ICT characteristic in the excited state. For compound 4, the fit line relationship between the Stokes shift and Δf has a comparably gentle slope and exhibited a slight deviation in the experimental data. This suggested that compound 4 underwent a small dipolar change in the excited process from a non-polar to polar solvent. In contrast, the slope value of the line relationship for compound 5 was negative, which demonstrated that compound 5 had a negative solvatochromism. In other words, the ICT character of compounds 3–5 could be tuned by the terminal cyano groups.
The fluorescence quantum yields (ΦF) of compounds 3–5 were studied in different solvents to get a deep understanding of the solvatochromism behavior. ΦF of compound 3 was observed to be as high as 0.765 in the low polar solvent of toluene (Table 2), and gradually decreased with the increase in polarity, indicating that a strong solvent polarity could result in an increase in the non-radiative transition. However, compounds 4 and 5 exhibited a relatively higher ΦF in high polar solvents, while only a lower ΦF was observed in a non-polar solvent, demonstrating that the cyano substituents on the TPA units were not bad for ΦF.
The luminescence decay lifetimes of compounds 3–5 were measured in dichloromethane solution (Table 1). Compound 3 (2.68 ns) exhibited a relatively higher luminescence decay lifetime than that of compounds 4 and 5 (1.58 ns and 1.86 ns), demonstrating that introducing the cyano substituents to the TPA units led to an enhanced ICT character which changes the decay of the singlet excited states. Actually, the high strength ICT led to the increase of intramolecular rotation and the distortion which increased the energy loss of the non-radiative transition, and thus the luminescence decay lifetime was decreased.
The metal ion Hg2+ was chosen as an example to further assess the influence of metal ions on the absorption and emission spectra of compounds 3–5. The concentration of compounds 3–5 was fixed at 1 × 10−5 M L−1 and the metal ion concentration varied from 1 × 10−4 to 9 × 10−4 M L−1. The UV-vis absorption and PL spectra were recorded immediately after the addition of metal ions (Fig. 5 and S12†). The absorption and emission maximum of compound 3 in DMF solution only displayed a gradual decrease without a notable red shift with the addition of Hg2+ up to the concentration of 9 × 10−4 mol L−1, which may be attributed to the Hg2+ ion-induced decrease in the ICT band.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 5 Absorption spectra of compounds 3–5 in DMF (1 × 10−5 M L−1) with the addition of Hg2+in DMF solution (1 × 10−4 M L−1). | ||
In the case of cyano-substituted TPA derivatives, the absorption spectra of compounds 4 and 5 show a remarkable hypsochromic shift and a new peak appeared at around 330 nm after Hg2+ ions were added. Simultaneously, with increasing the Hg2+ ions, the peak intensity of the absorption spectra decreased. The results may be attributed to a result of ICT between the electron-withdrawing cyano and electron-donating TPA units induced by Hg2+ ions, or to the new coordinative complex possibly formed between the cyano groups and Hg2+ ions. In addition, the presence of Hg2+ ions had a certain influence on the emission intensity, which presented firstly an increase, and then a decrease as the Hg2+ ions increased.
| Compound | CV/V | Energya/eV − exp | Eoptgb | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eox/onset | Ered/onset | EHOMO | ELUMO | Eg | ||
| a Electronic structures were determined from the formula: EHOMO = −(Eox + 4.7) (eV) and ELUMO = −(Ered + 4.7) (eV).b Eoptg = 1240/λ (absorption band edge). | ||||||
| 3 | 0.97 | −1.38 | −5.67 | −3.32 | 2.35 | 2.37 |
| 4 | 0.99 | −1.30 | −5.69 | −3.40 | 2.29 | 2.15 |
| 5 | 0.96 | −1.36 | −5.66 | −3.34 | 2.32 | 2.15 |
| 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bond length | |||||
| O39–C38 | 1.22 | N92–C90 | 1.16 | C86–N88 | 1.16 |
| C38–C37 | 1.47 | C90–C89 | 1.43 | C86–C85 | 1.43 |
| C32–N25 | 1.41 | C89–C38 | 1.37 | C85–C34 | 1.37 |
| C26–N25 | 1.43 | C38–C37 | 1.44 | C34–C33 | 1.44 |
| C24–N25 | 1.42 | C32–N25 | 1.40 | C28–N21 | 1.40 |
| C10–C19 | 1.46 | C26–N25 | 1.43 | C22–N21 | 1.43 |
| C9–C10 | 1.35 | C24–N25 | 1.42 | C20–N21 | 1.42 |
| C6–C9 | 1.46 | C10–C19 | 1.46 | C15–C8 | 1.46 |
| C2–C7 | 1.43 | C9–C10 | 1.35 | C8–C7 | 1.35 |
| C7–N8 | 1.16 | C6–C9 | 1.46 | C7–C6 | 1.46 |
| C2–C7 | 1.43 | C2–Br95 | 1.92 | ||
| C7–N8 | 1.16 | ||||
![]() |
|||||
| Bond angle | |||||
| O39–C38–C37 | 124.91 | C90–C89–C38 | 125.18 | C86–C85–C84 | 125.18 |
| C24–N25–C26 | 119.01 | C89–C38–C37 | 131.70 | C34–C33–C32 | 117.33 |
| C26–N25–C32 | 119.75 | C24–N25–C26 | 118.34 | C20–N21–C22 | 118.24 |
| C24–N25–C32 | 121.24 | C26–N25–C32 | 120.09 | C22–N21–C28 | 120.40 |
| C9–C10–C19 | 126.95 | C24–N25–C32 | 121.57 | C20–N21–C28 | 121.36 |
| C6–C9–C10 | 126.40 | C9–C10–C19 | 126.87 | C7–C8–C15 | 126.72 |
| C6–C9–C10 | 126.38 | C6–C7–C8 | 126.04 | ||
![]() |
|||||
| Dihedral angle | |||||
| C23–C24–C26–C28 | −73.80 | C23–C24–C26–C28 | −78.71 | C19–C20–C22–C24 | −79.64 |
| C21–C24–C32–C35 | −63.10 | C21–C24–C32–C35 | −61.26 | C17–C20–C28–C31 | −62.31 |
| C27–C26–C32–C33 | −71.24 | C27–C26–C32–C33 | −69.32 | C23–C22–C28–C29 | −67.80 |
| C9–C10–C19–C20 | 2.67 | C9–C10–C19– C20 | 2.01 | C16–C15–C8–C7 | 5.57 |
| C5–C6–C9–C10 | 2.20 | C5–C6–C9–C10 | 1.10 | C5–C6–C7–C8 | 13.93 |
The HOMO and LUMO for compounds 3–5 are reported in Table 4. The HOMO was delocalized over the entire molecule, while the LUMO was mainly localized on the center conjugated moieties through the π-bridge. In addition, the LUMO for compounds 4 and 5 extended the terminal substituted cyano branches on the TPA moieties. Especially, for compound 5, the terminal substituted cyano group presented a stronger influence on the LUMO, which further verified that the charge distribution on such molecules was extremely influenced by the terminal cyano groups. The results would lead to the difference in the photophysical properties among compounds 3–5 when the intramolecular charge transfer happened during an excited process.
The HOMO energy levels (EHOMO) and LUMO energy levels (ELUMO) are estimated in Table 4. EHOMO and ELUMO for compound 3 were −5.28 and −3.01 eV, respectively. Introducing the electron-withdrawing cyano group on the benzene ring resulted in a remarkably low ELUMO with an increasing number of cyano groups. Compared with compound 3, introducing dicyanovinyl arms on the TPA parts for compound 4 resulted in lower EHOMO and ELUMO energies. However, in comparison with compound 4, compound 5 exhibited a slight increase in EHOMO and ELUMO due to the absence of cyano substituents on the phenyl core, which was in agreement with the electrochemical experiment. In other words, the cyano substituents on the TPA-based derivatives could finely regulate the electron structures, resulting in the red-light properties.
Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Electrochemical parameters, thermal properties, solid morphology, photophysical properties, and metal ion detection of the compounds. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra24341f |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |