Au NCs-enhanced chemiluminescence from NaHSO3–H2O2 and its analytical application

Yanyan Hea, Yanyan Suia, Shuangjiao Xub and Funan Chen*a
aThe Key Laboratory of Luminescence and Real-time Analytical Chemistry, Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest University, Chongqing, China 400715. E-mail: chenfn@swu.edu.cn; Fax: +86-23-68258363; Tel: +86-18523074002
bInstitute of Cotton Research of Caas, Henan, China

Received 16th November 2015 , Accepted 23rd December 2015

First published on 5th January 2016


Abstract

It was found that the ultra-weak chemiluminescence (CL) emission from the sodium bisulfite (NaHSO3)–H2O2 system could be enhanced by gold nanoclusters (Au NCs). The as-prepared Au NCs were applied to the NaHSO3–H2O2 system for the first time, and a decreased CL was observed in the presence of trypsin. This novel CL system based on Au NCs–NaHSO3–H2O2 was developed for trypsin determination. Herein, UV-visible spectroscopy and fluorescence spectra coupled with radical scavengers were used to explore the possible mechanism. The enhanced CL could be attributed to the catalysis of Au NCs and the decreased CL should be ascribed to the decomposition of Au NCs. Finally, the proposed method was successfully utilized to detect trypsin in human urine samples with good accuracy and precision.


1. Introduction

Proteases are enzymes that can catalyze the breakdown of proteins, which widely exist in animal internal organs, plant leaves, fruits and microorganisms, and play an essential and irreplaceable role in biological and physiological processes.1 As a kind of protease, trypsin is the most important digestive enzyme in the pancreas zymogen, which can be used as a dependable and specific diagnostic biomarker for pancreatitis, cystic fibrosis and cancer.2,3 Therefore, it is of great importance to detect trypsin in human metabolic processes.

A number of analytical methods have been employed to determine trypsin, such as fluorescence methods,4,5 Raman,6 colorimetric,7,8 electrophoresis,9 electrochemical10–12 and liquid chromatography.13 However, the fluorometric detection of trypsin usually requires interaction with a proper fluorescent probe or sensor.4,5 The electrochemical methods for trypsin detection require a complicated electrode preparation procedure.10–12 Liquid chromatography methods for trypsin detection possess a high selectivity, while these methods suffer from a tedious sample preparation process. Hence, these conventional methods may require sophisticated instrumentation or complicated operation processes.

Chemiluminescence (CL) is known as a desirable analytical technique due to its high sensitivity, wide linear range, low detection and simple instrumentation.14–17 CL detection technology has been applied to the analysis of many substances.18–23 The traditional luminescence reagents such as luminol, TCPO, Ru(bipy)32+, and acridinium ester were widely used in many CL systems and applied in analytical chemistry.24–27 Unfortunately, these reagents are expensive or poisonous to the environment. Thus, it is an attractive research area to develop a new CL system with relatively green and cheap reagents.

In recent years, the potential applications of the ultra-weak CL systems have gradually received research interest.28–31 Nevertheless, the development of weak chemiluminescence was limited because its intensity was not strong enough for detecting demand. Therefore, it is necessary to find out the ways to increase its sensitivity.

Being an intriguing research field, noble metal nanoclusters (NCs), especially Au NCs have gained great attention because of their remarkable optical properties.32 Until now, the applications of Au NCs in analytical fields mainly focused on their fluorescence properties.32,33 Hence, it is highly desirable to find that Au NCs have effect on the ultra-weak CL reaction of NaHSO3 and H2O2.

In this paper, we report that the weak CL emission from NaHSO3–H2O2 was significantly enhanced by Au NCs. To the best of our knowledge, there is no report about Au NCs-enhanced CL from NaHSO3–H2O2. The possible mechanism of enhanced CL signal was also discussed. In the presence of trypsin, the CL signal greatly decreased due to the decomposition of Au NCs. Under optimum conditions, the CL intensity was linear with trypsin concentration, which led to a novel sensing platform based on the system of Au NCs-enhanced NaHSO3–H2O2. And then the proposed method has been applied to detect trypsin in human urine samples with desirable accuracy and precision.

2. Experimental

2.1 Reagents and materials

All chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade and used as received without further purification, and ultrapure water was used throughout. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) and trypsin were purchased from Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). 30% (v/v) H2O2 and nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) were purchased from Kelong Reagent Co., Chengdu, China. NaHSO3 was purchased from Beijing J & K Chemical Co., Ltd. Thiourea and ascorbic acid (AA) were commercially obtained from Chongqing Chemical Regent Company (Chongqing, China).

Stock solutions of trypsin (1.0 × 10−3 g mL−1) were prepared by dissolving 0.1000 g trypsin in 100 mL Tris–HCl buffer (0.05 mol L−1, PH = 8). Trypsin working solution (containing 5 × 10−3 M CaCl2) was prepared by diluting trypsin stock solution with the previous buffer. Stock solutions of NaHSO3 (1 mol L−1) were prepared by dissolving 5.2030 g NaHSO3 in 50 mL ultra-pure water. Working solutions of H2O2 were prepared fresh daily by dilution of 30% H2O2 with water.

2.2 Apparatus

The CL experiments were carried out with a Ultra-Weak Luminescence analyzer (Xi'an Remax company, Xi'an, China). CL spectra was obtained by a photomultiplier tube (opened at −900 kV). UV-vis absorption spectra were taken on a Model UV-2550s Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). Fluorescence spectra were obtained by means of F-4500 spectrofluorophotometer (Hitachi, Japan). Determination of trypsin was performed based on the net CL intensity of ΔI = I0Is, where I0 and Is denote the CL intensity in the absence and presence of trypsin, respectively.

2.3 Preparation of BSA–Au NCs

BSA modified Au NCs were prepared according to the previous literature.34 HAuCl4 solution (15 mL, 10 mmol L−1, 37 °C) introduced into BSA solution (15 mL, 50 mg mL−1, 37 °C), stirring for 2 min. Then NaOH solution (1.5 mL, 1 mol L−1) was added to the mixture. The mixture reaction allowed incubating at 37 °C for 24 h. The color of the solution changed from light yellow to light brown, and then to deep brown. The as-prepared Au NCs were then dialyzed in ultra-pure water for 48 h. The final solution was stored at 4 °C for further work.

2.4 Sample preparation

Human urine sample was analyzed without any pretreatment. The obtained sample was diluted 10-folds with Tris–HCl buffer (pH = 8.0). The above solution was then used for trypsin detection.

2.5 CL system based on Au NCs for detection of trypsin

In a typical experiment, 2 mL Au NCs was incubated with 500 μL trypsin at 37 °C for 40 min to destroy BSA–Au NCs and the as-prepared solution was placed to wait for the next measurement. In a quartz glass cuvette, 100 μL Au NCs solution was first mixed with 200 μL NaHSO3 solution, and then 200 μL H2O2 was injected by a syringe. The CL profile and intensity was captured for a 0.2 s interval with the voltage of −900 kV.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Enhancement of NaHSO3–H2O2 CL

In order to evaluate the feasibility of the method, contrast experiment was conducted. As shown in Fig. 1 (curve a), the weak CL from NaHSO3–H2O2 was recorded. The enhancement effect of Au NCs on the NaHSO3–H2O2 was studied. As show in curve b, the CL intensity of NaHSO3–H2O2 could be enhanced remarkably about 11 folds after adding Au NCs. When trypsin exists in Au NCs-enhanced system, the CL intensity decreased significantly (curve c).
image file: c5ra24224j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Kinetic curves of CL systems: (curve a) NaHSO3–H2O2; (curve b) NaHSO3–H2O2–Au NCs; (curve c) NaHSO3–H2O2–Au NCs–trypsin. NaHSO3: 0.15 mol L−1, H2O2: 0.55 mol L−1, Au NCs: 6 × 10−4 mol L−1, trypsin: 50 μg mL−1.

3.2 Optimization of the reaction conditions

The reaction conditions were optimized for the NaHSO3–H2O2–Au NCs CL system as shown in Fig. 2. The effect of the NaHSO3 concentration on the CL was examined in the range from 0.01 to 0.25 mol L−1. The result was shown in Fig. 2a. The maximal signal was obtained at 0.15 mol L−1. Therefore, the concentration of 0.15 mol L−1 was selected for subsequent investigating.
image file: c5ra24224j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Effects of the reaction conditions on the NaHSO3–H2O2–AuNCs system. (a) Effect of NaHSO3 concentration: H2O2: 0.5 mol L−1; Au NCs: 7.5 × 10−4 mol L−1; incubating time: 60 min. (b) Effect of H2O2 concentration: NaHSO3: 0.15 mol L−1; AuNCs: 7.5 × 10−4 mol L−1; incubating time: 60 min. (c) Effect of Au NCs concentration: NaHSO3: 0.15 mol L−1; H2O2: 0.55 mol L−1; incubating time: 60 min. (d) Effect of incubating time: NaHSO3: 0.15 mol L−1; H2O2: 0.55 mol L−1; Au NCs: 6 × 10−4 mol L−1.

As a basic reaction solution, H2O2 reacts with NaHSO3 to produce CL emission. The effect of the H2O2 concentration was investigating over the range 0.3 to 0.6 mol L−1. As shown in Fig. 2b. The CL intensity increased with increasing H2O2 concentration in the range of 0.3 to 0.55 mol L−1. At the concentration above 0.55 mol L−1, there is no obvious change for CL intensity. Consequently, 0.55 mol L−1 H2O2 was chosen as the optimal for further experiments.

As a CL enhancer, the effect of Au NCs concentration on the CL was studied in the range from 1 × 10−4 to 7.5 × 10−4 mol L−1. As can be seen from Fig. 2c, the CL signal increased on increasing the concentration of Au NCs from 1 × 10−4 to 6 × 10−4 mol L−1. Higher concentration result in an obvious decrease in CL response. Hence, 6 × 10−4 mol L−1 Au NCs was recommended.

In order to test the effect of the incubating time on the CL intensity, various incubating time ranging from 20 to 100 min was compared. As shown in Fig. 2d, with the increase of incubating time, the CL intensity increased sharply and then reached a plateau at 40 min. Thus, the incubating time of 40 min was selected in this system.

3.3 Possible mechanism of CL system

The CL-generation mechanism for NaHSO3–H2O2 system had summarized as the following steps by Li et al.35

(1) HSO3 was oxidized by H2O2 to produce sulfite radical (˙SO3), which then dimerized to give S2O62− ion.

(2) The emitting species (SO*2), which was generated by the decomposition of S2O62− ion. The emission wavelength of SO*2 is 260–480 nm. Due to the low emission quantum yield of SO*2, the CL intensity is very low. Thus, it is an extreme difficulty to capture the emission wavelength of SO*2.36

The UV-visible absorption spectra was conducted in order to confirm the possible catalysis of Au NCs. As shown in Fig. 3, the maximum absorption peaks of Au NCs is observed at around 280 nm and NaHSO3–H2O2 system at around 204 nm. Therefore, the light absorption of the mixed system was approximately equal to the sum of the light absorption of the two single systems, which suggests that no change was happened between the species after the reaction.


image file: c5ra24224j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 UV-vis absorption spectra of (a) Au NCs; (b) NaHSO3–H2O2; (c) NaHSO3–H2O2–Au NCs.

A F-4500 mode fluorescence spectrophotometer has been used to discuss the mechanism of chemiluminescence based on NaHSO3–H2O2–AuNCs system in the presence of trypsin. As shown in Fig. 4a, the fluorescence intensity of Au NCs decreased clearly after the CL reaction. It was further demonstrated that BSA–Au NCs was not the luminophor of the CL system. The fluorescence spectra of Au NCs and the mixture of Au NCs–trypsin were shown in Fig. 4b. It can be seen that the fluorescence intensity of Au NCs decreased in the presence of trypsin, which ascribed to the cleft of BSA molecule from Au NCs.33 We presumed that the hydrolysis reaction of trypsin with BSA make Au NCs lost the protective effect of BSA. Therefore, trypsin can be detected, making use of our desirable method.


image file: c5ra24224j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (a) Fluorescence spectra of BSA–Au NCs before and after the CL reaction. (b) Fluorescence spectra of BSA–Au NCs with and without trypsin.

The mechanism was further discussed by the quenching effect of different reactive oxygen species (ROS) on the CL system. Ascorbic acid (AA) is well known as an efficient ROS scavenger, which can terminate active oxygen radicals through electron transfer.37 AA at a concentration of 0.1 mmol L−1 had adverse impact on the CL intensity, the intensity decreased by a factor of ∼82.5 (Table 1). Thus, the CL reaction must happen in a radical way. NBT was often used for the detection of O2˙ radicals, which could be reduced to its deep blue diformazan form by O2˙.38 When 1 mmol L−1 NBT was added to the CL system, and then the CL intensity decreased by a factor of ∼42.6. The result confirmed that O2˙ was also intermediate in the CL process. Thiourea is an effective radical scavenger for OH˙.39 When 1 mmol L−1 thiourea was added to CL system, a distinct inhibition is observed by a factor of ∼57.6. It indicated that OH˙ and O2˙ were involved in the CL reaction process. It was reported that H2O2 decomposition on supported metal catalysts such as Au NPs, Ag NPs and CuO NPs involved the formation of hydroxyl radicals OH˙.40–42 In the same manner, we suggested that the O–O bond of H2O2 might be broken up into double OH˙ radicals by virtue of the catalysis of Au nanoclusters. The OH˙ reacted with ˙SO3 to form HSO4, and then HSO4 was transformed to SO*2. Finally, SO*2 returned back to ground state with the emission of light. Based on the above results, the whole enhanced mechanism is summarized in Scheme 1.

Table 1 Effect of different radical scavengers on the CL of NaHSO3–H2O2 in the presence of Au nanoclustersa
Scavengers Intermediates Concentration Percent inhibitionb (%)
a Solution condition: 0.55 mol L−1 H2O2, 6.0 × 10−4 mol L−1 Au NCs, 0.15 mol L−1 NaHSO3.b Average value of three determination.
Ascorbic acid OH˙, O2˙ 0.1 mmol L−1 82.5
Thiourea OH˙ 1 mmol L−1 57.6
NBT O2˙ 1 mmol L−1 42.6
NaN3 1O2 5 mmol L−1 8



image file: c5ra24224j-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Possible mechanism for the Au NCs–NaHSO3–H2O2 system.

3.4 Analytical performance

Under the optimum conditions described above, CL intensity versus trypsin concentration shows good linearity ranging from 2.4–48 μg mL−1 (Fig. 5). The regression equation is ΔI = 3024.9 + 53.94[trypsin] (μg mL−1). The linear correlation coefficient is 0.9973, the limit of detection (LOD) for trypsin is 0.19 μg mL−1. The relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 3% for 100 μg mL−1 trypsin (n = 10).
image file: c5ra24224j-f5.tif
Fig. 5 The calibration curve for trypsin. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three paralleled measurements.

3.5 Selectivity of the method to trypsin over other possible background species

The selectivity of the method for the detection trypsin was examined by compare the CL intensity of trypsin and the mixture of trypsin and background species. As can be seen in Fig. 6, the effect of 100 μg mL−1 urea, uric acid, glucose, ascorbic acid, dopamine, BSA, Fe3+, NH4+, Mg2+, Ca2+ and I on the detection of 10 μg mL−1 trypsin. These background species concentration adopted for interference studies are higher than that in normal urine samples. Most of the interferences have no influence on the determination of trypsin, indicating that the proposed CL system has good selectivity.
image file: c5ra24224j-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Relative CL intensity of (a) 10 μg mL−1 trypsin (b–l): the mixture of trypsin and potential background species (100 μg mL−1). From left to right: urea, uric acid, glucose, ascorbic acid, dopamine, BSA, Fe3+, NH4+, Mg2+, Ca2+ and I. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three paralleled measurements.

3.6 Detection of spiked trypsin in human urine

In order to test the applicability and reproducibility of the proposed method, recovery experiments were performed in human urine samples. These results were shown in Table 2. Desirable recoveries within the range of 87.5–104.2% was obtained, showing that this method has good practicability for trypsin detection.
Table 2 Detection of spiked trypsin in human urine
Samples Added (μg mL−1) trypsin Found (μg mL−1) trypsin Recovery (%) (n = 3)
1 2.4 2.1 87.5%
2 7.2 6.9 95.8%
3 14.4 15 104.2%


4. Conclusion

In this work, a novel method based on Au NCs-enhanced NaHSO3–H2O2 CL system was established for trypsin detection. The added Au NCs could increase the sensitivity of the weak CL system of NaHSO3–H2O2. In the presence of trypsin, Au NCs was destroyed because the protein template was enzymatically hydrolyzed, leading to the decreased CL response. The Au NCs-based method was successfully applied to the detection of trypsin in human urine samples with satisfactory accuracy and precision. With trypsin being an index for diseases diagnosis, our method possesses its potential application. Compared with conventional CL systems, the NaHSO3–H2O2 CL system is a simple, inexpensive, and relatively nontoxic. What's more, the study on the ultra-weak CL system of NaHSO3–H2O2–AuNCs is a new direction to explore a new CL system with nanocluster as catalysts.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by science and technology commission foundation of Chongqing (CSTC, 2010BB8328). We thank Prof. H. Z. Zheng and Prof. Y. M. Huang for measurements.

References

  1. H. Neurath, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1999, 96, 10962–10963 CrossRef CAS.
  2. X. Gao, G. C. Tang, Y. Li and X. G. Su, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2012, 743, 131–136 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. P. Miao, T. Liu, X. X. Li, L. M. Ning, J. Yin and K. Han, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2013, 49, 20–24 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. F. F. Zheng, J. F. Wu and G. C. Zhao, Anal. Methods, 2012, 4, 3932 RSC.
  5. K. H. Xu, F. Liu, J. Ma and B. Tang, Analyst, 2011, 136, 1199 RSC.
  6. L. X. Chen, X. L. Fu and J. H. Li, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 5905 RSC.
  7. W. X. Xue, G. X. Zhang and D. Q. Zhang, Analyst, 2011, 136, 3136 RSC.
  8. J. Kallos, D. Kahn and D. Rizok, Can. J. Biochem., 1964, 42, 235–241 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. J. Uriel and J. Berges, Nature, 1968, 218, 578–580 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. R. P. Liang, X. C. Tian, P. Qiu and J. D. Qiu, Anal. Chem., 2014, 86, 9256–9263 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. B. A. Zaccheo and R. M. Crooks, Anal. Chem., 2011, 83, 1185–1188 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. Y. Chen, J. W. Ding and W. Qin, Bioelectrochemistry, 2012, 88, 144–147 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. M. M. Vestling, C. M. Murphy and C. Fenselau, Anal. Chem., 1990, 62, 2391–2394 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. R. K. Zhang, G. K. Li and Y. F. Hu, Anal. Chem., 2015, 87, 5649–5655 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. F. Z. Fu, L. G. Ke and Y. F. Hu, Chin. J. Anal. Chem., 2015, 43, 1322–1328 Search PubMed.
  16. E. Wolyniec, J. Karpińska, S. Losiewska, M. Turkowicz, J. Klimczuk and A. Kojlo, Talanta, 2012, 96, 223–229 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. Y. Guo and B. X. Li, Carbon, 2015, 82, 459–469 CrossRef CAS.
  18. W. Y. Li, Q. F. Zhang, H. P. Zhou, J. Chen, Y. X. Li, C. Y. Zhang and C. Yu, Anal. Chem., 2015, 87, 8336–8341 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. H. Chen, R. B. Li, L. Lin, G. S. Guo and J. M. Lin, Talanta, 2010, 81, 1688–1696 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. S. Ahmed, S. Fujii, N. Kishikawa, Y. Ohba, K. Nakashima and N. Kuroda, J. Chromatogr. A, 2006, 1133, 76–82 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. Y. F. Zhang, J. F. Liu, T. Liu, H. B. Li, Q. W. Xue, R. Li, L. Wang, Q. L. Yue and S. H. Wang, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2016, 77, 111–115 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. Y. Zhou, H. Chen, N. Ogawa and J. M. Lin, J. Lumin., 2011, 131, 1991–1997 CrossRef CAS.
  23. Z. Lin, H. Chen and J. M. Lin, Analyst, 2013, 138, 5182 RSC.
  24. Q. L. Zhang, L. Wu, C. Lv and X. Y. Zhang, J. Chromatogr. A, 2012, 1242, 84–91 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. S. Meseguer-Lioret, C. Molins-Legua and P. Campíns-Falcó, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2005, 536, 121–127 CrossRef.
  26. N. A. Al-Arfaj, Talanta, 2004, 62, 255–263 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. D. Dreveny, C. Klammer, J. Michalowsky and G. Gübitz, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1999, 398, 183–190 CrossRef CAS.
  28. J. M. Lin and M. Yamada, Anal. Chem., 2000, 72, 1148–1155 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. Y. Zhou, G. W. Xing, H. Chen, N. Ogawa and J. M. Lin, Talanta, 2012, 99, 471–477 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. M. Wang, L. X. Zhao and J. M. Lin, Luminescence, 2007, 22, 182–188 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. Y. D. Liang, J. F. Song and X. F. Yang, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2004, 510, 21–28 CrossRef CAS.
  32. Y. Yue, T. Y. Liu, H. W. Li, Z. Y. Liu and Y. Q. Wu, Nanoscale, 2012, 4, 2251 RSC.
  33. L. Z. Hu, S. Han, S. M. Parveen, Y. L. Yuan, L. Zhang and G. B. Xu, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2012, 32, 297–299 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  34. J. P. Xie, Y. G. Zheng and J. Y. Ying, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 888–889 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  35. R. B. Li, T. Kameda, Y. Li, A. Toriba, N. Tang, K. Hayakawa and J. M. Lin, Talanta, 2011, 85, 2711–2714 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  36. R. B. Li, H. Chen, Y. Li, C. Lu and J. M. Lin, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2012, 116, 2192–2197 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. H. Dai, X. P. Wu, Y. M. Wang, W. C. Zhou and G. N. Chen, Electrochim. Acta, 2008, 53, 5113–5117 CrossRef CAS.
  38. B. H. J. Bielski, G. G. Shiue and S. Bajuk, J. Phys. Chem., 1980, 84, 830–833 CrossRef CAS.
  39. W. F. Wang, M. N. Schuchmann, H. P. Schuchmann, W. Knolle, J. V. Sonntag and C. V. Sonntag, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 238–245 CrossRef CAS.
  40. Y. X. Li, P. Yang, P. Wang and L. Wang, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2007, 387, 585–592 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. H. Chen, F. Gao, R. He and D. X. Cui, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2007, 315, 158–163 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  42. M. J. Chaichi and M. Ehsani, J. Fluoresc., 2015, 25, 861–870 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra24224j

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.