Side-chain shuffling: regioselective synthesis of mixed tail discotic mesogens

Emilie Voisin and Vance E. Williams*
Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr., Burnaby, B.C., Canada. E-mail: vancew@sfu.ca; Fax: +1 778 782 3765; Tel: +1 778 782 8059

Received 16th October 2015 , Accepted 6th January 2016

First published on 18th January 2016


Abstract

A procedure for the regioselective synthesis of discotic mesogens bearing multiple side chains of different lengths is reported. A series of isomeric dibenzoquinoxaline mesogens obtained by this route showed phase behaviour that was highly sensitive to chain location.


Over the past two decades, columnar liquid crystals have emerged as promising organic semiconductors for a variety of applications, including photovoltaics, OLEDs and field effect transistors.1 A key challenge in the design of these materials is the need to tune their phase ranges to meet the processing and operational requirements of the target application while preserving the desired molecular electronic properties. In this context, varying the flexible chains that surround the aromatic core is particularly attractive because changes in chain length, branching and pendant functional groups all strongly impact phase behaviour.2

An alternative to changing the identity of the side chains is to alter how these groups are disposed around the central core. For example, we have shown that swapping the positions of the hexyloxy and decyloxy chains from 1 to 2 (Fig. 1) leads to a decrease in the clearing and melting temperatures by 18 °C and 33 °C, respectively.3 However, relatively few studies have explored the effects of this kind of side chain shuffling,4–12 likely due to the challenges associated with regioselectively preparing discotic mesogens bearing several different chains.


image file: c5ra21642g-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Discotic mesogens 1 and 2.

We report herein a modular synthetic strategy that permits us to systematically alter the substitution pattern on a discotic mesogen. Our target compounds were the three dibenzoquinoxaline derivatives BQ(6.10.6.10), BQ(6.10.10.6) and BQ(10.6.6.10); these mesogens each have two hexyloxy and two decyloxy chains and represent three of the four possible permutations for this set of chains. We selected these compounds both to highlight our synthetic approach, and to provide the opportunity to study the effects of chain pattern across a series of isomers. The fourth regioisomer, BQ(6.6.10.10), was previously prepared in our lab by a route that was restricted to derivatives with identical alkyl chains on the same ring,13 a limitation not shared by the current approach (Fig. 2).


image file: c5ra21642g-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Target molecules discussed in this work.

As a representative example, the synthesis of BQ(6.10.6.10) is shown in Schemes 1 and 2. As a low symmetry derivative with two distinct groups on each ring, this target would be difficult to synthesize using other procedures. The key intermediate in this route was the diphenylacetylene, 7. We have previously shown that electron rich tolanes can be converted in three steps to dibenzoquinoxalines such as BQ(6.6.10.10);13 as such, preparation of 7 should provide access to our target mesogen.


image file: c5ra21642g-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Reagents and conditions (a) CnH2n+1Br, K2CO3, NBu4Br, butanone, reflux, 24 h; (b) acetic anhydride, pyridine, reflux 6 h; (c) ICl, CH2Cl2, 0 °C; (d) LiOH·H2O, MeOH, H2O, THF, RT, 4 h; (e) CmH2m+1Br, K2CO3, NBu4Br, butanone, reflux, 24 h; (f) TMS–acetylene, CuI, PdCl2(PPh3)2, (i-Pr)2NH, THF, 60 °C, 24 h; (g) K2CO3, MeOH, THF, RT 3 h.

image file: c5ra21642g-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions (a) CuI, Pd(PPh3)4, (i-Pr)2NH, THF, reflux, 12 h; (b) I2, DMSO, reflux, 12 h; (c) VOF3, BF3·Et2O, CH2Cl2, 2 h; (d) 1,2-diaminomaleonitrile, AcOH, reflux, 24 h.

Monoalkylation of catechol with the appropriate 1-bromoalkane followed by acetylation of the free phenolic group afforded the 2-alkoxyphenylacetates 3a and 3b, respectively. These intermediates were iodinated to yield the 2-alkoxy-5-iodophenylacetates 4a and 4b using the conditions reported by Boden and coworkers.14 Although this regioselectivity was expected a priori, it was experimentally confirmed by the observation of an NOE cross peak between the methylene protons of the ether (3.9 ppm) and the proton at the 3-position of the ring, which indicated that substitution took place at the 5-rather than the 4-position. Hydrolytic removal of the acetyl group and subsequent alkylation of the resulting phenol afforded the derivatives 5a and 5b. Pd-catalyzed coupling of these halides with TMS–acetylene, followed by deprotection afforded the terminal alkynes 6a and 6b.

Cross coupling of the iodide 5a and the alkyne 6b under standard Sonogashira–Hagihara conditions afforded the tolane 7 in 77% yield. Oxidation of this diphenylacetylene with stoichiometric I2/DMSO gave the benzil 8, which was readily cyclized to the phenanthrene quinone 9. Condensation of this quinone with diaminomaleonitrile yielded the target mesogen BQ(6.10.6.10).

Because of the modularity of this approach, the intermediates 5a/b and 6a/b also provided access to BQ(6.10.10.6) and BQ(10.6.610). Coupling 5a and 6a yielded a diphenylacetylene intermediate that was then converted to BQ(6.10.10.6) using the same tolane-to-dibenzoquinoxaline reaction sequence shown in Scheme 2. BQ(10.6.6.10) was likewise obtained via the Pd cross-coupled product of 5b and 6b (see ESI).

Analyses of the phase behaviour of the three benzoquinoxalines were carried out using polarized optical microscopy (POM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and variable temperature X-ray diffraction (XRD), the results of which are summarized in Table 1. Each compound forms a single liquid crystal phase over a broad temperature range. Dendritic textures characteristic of columnar phases were observed for all compounds by POM (Fig. 3) when samples were cooled slowly from their isotropic phases. The observation of domains with approximately 6-fold symmetry (Fig. 3b) suggests that these phases are columnar hexagonal (Colh) phases. XRD experiments confirmed this assignment for all compounds, with the observation of low angle peaks that indexed to the (100) and (110) peaks of Colh phases. In every case, two additional broad peaks were observed at wider angles, corresponding to distances of approximately 4.3 Å and 3.5 Å; these were attributed to the alkyl chain halo and π-stacking peaks, respectively.

Table 1 Phase properties of dibenzoquinoxaline derivatives

image file: c5ra21642g-t1.tif

a Transition temperatures/enthalpies determined by DSC (scan rate = 10 °C min−1).b Cr = crystal, Colh = columnar hexagonal, I = isotropic.c Lattice spacings determined by XRD at 125 °C.d Data for BQ(6.6.10.10) from ref. 13.
BQ(10.6.6.10) image file: c5ra21642g-t2.tif
BQ(6.10.10.6) image file: c5ra21642g-t3.tif
BQ(6.10.6.10) image file: c5ra21642g-t4.tif
BQ(6.6.10.10)d image file: c5ra21642g-t5.tif



image file: c5ra21642g-f3.tif
Fig. 3 POM images of BQ(10.6.6.10) (a), BQ(10.6.10.6) (b), and BQ(6.10.10.6) (c). Samples (a) and (c) were imaged through 530 nm wave plate to improve viewing contrast of homeotropic domains.

Whereas BQ(6.10.10.6) and BQ(10.6.6.10) have nearly identical melting points (∼80 °C), their less symmetrical isomers BQ(6.10.6.10) and BQ(6.6.10.10) melt into their columnar phases at markedly lower temperatures (47 °C and 37 °C, respectively). This is consistent with our earlier observation that reducing the molecular symmetry tends to depress the crystal-to-columnar transition temperature within a series of isomers.3

The same generalization does not apply to the clearing temperatures. The three mesogens prepared for the current study have nearly identical Colh-isotropic transition temperatures (∼250 °C), despite the lower symmetry of BQ(6.10.6.10). In contrast, BQ(6.6.10.10) clears at 216 °C. Because BQ(6.10.6.10) and BQ(6.6.10.10) belong to the same point group, the large disparity in their clearing temperatures cannot be attributed to symmetry effects. The anomalously low clearing temperature of BQ(6.6.10.10) may result from it being less disc-shaped than its isomers due to the disposition its side chains. Investigations aimed at separating the effects of shape and symmetry on phase behaviour are underway in our laboratory, using the synthetic approach outlined above.

In conclusion, we have prepared a series of isomeric dibenzoquinoxalines using a new regiospecific synthetic strategy. Although the current work has focused on a series of isomers containing just two pairs of side chains, it is worth noting that mesogens with any combination of alkoxy groups can be regioselectively prepared in this manner. Moreover, quinones such as 9 and tolanes such as 7 are potential precursors to a range of mesogens, including triphenylenes,15–17 dibenzoquinoxalines,13,18,19 dibenzophenazines,3,20–27,27–29 phthalocyanines18,30 and metallomesogens.31,32 As such, this synthesis provides a general regioselective route to a wide range of discotic mesogens.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank NSERC (RGP/238724-2011) and SFU for funding. This work made use of the 4D LABS shared facilities supported by the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund (BCKDF), Western Economic Diversification Canada (WD) and SFU.

Notes and references

  1. W. Pisula and K. Müllen, in Handbook of Liquid Crystals, Wiley-VCH, Germany, 2nd edn, 2014, vol. 8, pp. 627–673 Search PubMed.
  2. S. Kumar, in Handbook of Liquid Crystals, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2014, vol. 4, pp. 467–520 Search PubMed.
  3. E. Voisin, E. Johan Foster, M. Rakotomalala and V. E. Williams, Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 3251–3261 CrossRef CAS.
  4. M. T. Allen, S. Diele, K. D. M. Harris, T. Hegmann, B. M. Kariuki, D. Lose, J. A. Preece and C. Tschierske, J. Mater. Chem., 2001, 11, 302–311 RSC.
  5. S. Setia, A. Soni, M. Gupta, S. Sidiq and S. K. Pal, Liq. Cryst., 2013, 40, 1364–1372 CrossRef CAS.
  6. N. Boden, R. Bushby, A. Cammidge and G. Headdock, Synthesis-Stuttgart, 1995, 31–32 CrossRef CAS.
  7. R. Borner and R. Jackson, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 845–846 RSC.
  8. S. J. Cross, J. W. Goodby, A. W. Hall, M. Hird, S. M. Kelly, K. J. Toyne and C. Wu, Liq. Cryst., 1998, 25, 1–11 CrossRef CAS.
  9. Z. Ke-Qing, H. Ping, W. Bi-Qin, Y. Wen-Hao, C. Hong-Mei, W. Xin-Ling and Y. Shimizu, Chin. J. Chem., 2007, 25, 375–381 CrossRef.
  10. P. Ruan, B. Xiao, H.-L. Ni, P. Hu, B.-Q. Wang, K.-Q. Zhao, Q.-D. Zeng and C. Wang, Liq. Cryst., 2014, 41, 1152–1161 CrossRef CAS.
  11. P. J. Stackhouse and M. Hird, Liq. Cryst., 2008, 35, 597–607 CrossRef CAS.
  12. J. Szydlowska, P. Krzyczkowska, P. Gniewek, D. Pociecha and A. Krowczynski, Liq. Cryst., 2015, 42, 1558–1570 CAS.
  13. E. J. Foster, J. Babuin, N. Nguyen and V. E. Williams, Chem. Commun., 2004, 2052–2053 RSC.
  14. N. Boden, R. Bushby and A. Cammidge, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 924–927 CrossRef CAS.
  15. C. Feng, X.-L. Tian, J. Zhou, S.-K. Xiang, W.-H. Yu, B.-Q. Wang, P. Hu, C. Redshaw and K.-Q. Zhao, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2014, 12, 6977–6981 CAS.
  16. G. Wenz, Makromol. Chem., Rapid Commun., 1985, 6, 577–584 CrossRef CAS.
  17. B. Mohr, V. Enkelmann and G. Wegner, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 635–638 CrossRef CAS.
  18. B. Mohr, G. Wegner and K. Ohta, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 995–996 RSC.
  19. J. Babuin, J. Foster and V. E. Williams, Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 7003–7005 CrossRef CAS.
  20. C. W. Ong, J.-Y. Hwang, M.-C. Tzeng, S.-C. Liao, H.-F. Hsu and T.-H. Chang, J. Mater. Chem., 2007, 17, 1785–1790 RSC.
  21. C. W. Ong, C.-Y. Hwang, S.-C. Liao, C.-H. Pan and T.-H. Chang, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 5149–5154 RSC.
  22. M.-C. Tzeng, S.-C. Liao, T.-H. Chang, S.-C. Yang, M.-W. Weng, H.-C. Yang, M. Y. Chiang, Z. Kai, J. Wu and C. W. Ong, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 1704–1712 RSC.
  23. C. W. Ong, Y.-C. Chan, M.-C. Yeh, H.-Y. Lin and H.-F. Hsu, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 8657–8659 RSC.
  24. K. J. A. Bozek, K. I. Ho, T. Saint-Martin, P. Argyropoulos and V. E. Williams, Materials, 2015, 8, 270–284 CrossRef.
  25. K. J. A. Bozek and V. E. Williams, Soft Matter, 2014, 10, 5749–5754 RSC.
  26. E. J. Foster, R. B. Jones, C. Lavigueur and V. E. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 8569–8574 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. E. J. Foster, C. Lavigueur, Y. C. Ke and V. E. Williams, J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 4062–4068 RSC.
  28. C. Lavigueur, E. J. Foster and V. E. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 11791–11800 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. C. W. Ong, C. Q. Yan, M.-C. Yeh and M.-C. Tzeng, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 2015, 610, 249–254 CrossRef CAS.
  30. M. Ichihara, M. Miida, B. Mohr and K. Ohta, J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines, 2006, 10, 1145–1155 CrossRef CAS.
  31. K. Ohta, M. Ikejima, M. Moriya, H. Hasebe and I. Yamamoto, J. Mater. Chem., 1998, 8, 1971–1977 RSC.
  32. K. Ohta, R. Higashi, M. Ikejima, I. Yamamoto and N. Kobayashi, J. Mater. Chem., 1998, 8, 1979–1991 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Full synthetic and characterization details. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra21642g

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.