Cloud point phenomena in aqueous solutions of an anionic gemini surfactant with a dibenzene spacer in the presence of tetra-n-propyl-ammonium bromide

Danhua Xiea and Jianxi Zhao*b
aDepartment of Chemistry, Fujian Province University Key Laboratory of Green Energy and Environment Catalysis, Ningde Normal University, Ningde, Fujian 352100, P. R. China
bInstitute of Colloid and Interface Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108, P. R. China. E-mail: jxzhao.colloid@fzu.edu.cn

Received 17th September 2015 , Accepted 3rd March 2016

First published on 4th March 2016


Abstract

The cloud point (CP) behaviour of a carboxylate gemini surfactant, O,O′-bis(sodium 2-dodecylcarboxylate)-p-dibenzenediol (referred to as C12ϕ2C12), in aqueous solution has been examined in the presence of tetra-propyl-ammonium bromide (Pr4NBr), an organic salt with less hydrophobicity than that of commonly used species. The aggregates of C12ϕ2C12 in the solution were investigated by dynamic light scattering (DLS), steady-state fluorescence and rheological measurements. Compared with traditional single chain surfactants, C12ϕ2C12 showed the CP phenomena at very low surfactant concentrations. In the presence of Pr4NBr, C12ϕ2C12 in aqueous solution formed several types of aggregates with different sizes. As the temperature was raised to the CP, the micelles rapidly associated, resulting in a cloud-like appearance of the solution. The mechanism has been attributed to C12ϕ2C12, which can provide an attractive force for the micelle–micelle contact. Namely, with increasing temperature, some of the C12ϕ2C12 molecules within the micelles changed their configuration from cis- to trans-form, leading to some tails of C12ϕ2C12 in aggregates stretching towards the solution. When such micelles approached each other, these projecting tails interacted hydrophobically, and this resulted in the association of the micelles.


1. Introduction

Cloud point (CP), or, more properly, lower consolute phase behaviour, is a common phenomenon for aqueous solutions of non-ionic surfactants upon heating. This behaviour has been attributed to dehydration of hydrophilic head groups of non-ionic surfactants with increasing temperature which leads to association between the micelles due to van der Waals attractive forces.1

CP phenomenon also occurs in ionic surfactant systems but the mechanism is more complex than that in non-ionic systems since electrostatic repulsion is ever-present between the charged micelles, which together with their hydration hindrance may greatly exceed the attraction between the micelles induced by van der Waals forces.2,3 Therefore, the generation of the CP phenomenon in ionic surfactant systems always requires the addition of a salt to screen the charge of the micelles. Another role of the salt is to pull the micelles together (providing attractive force). Symmetrical quaternary ammonium bromides such as tetra-n-butyl ammonium/phosphonium and tetra-n-amyl ammonium bromides are often applied for this purpose. For example, for the sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) system, the alkyl quaternary ammonium ion, R4N+, orients its alkyl chains in two directions due to geometrical restrictions: one towards the water phase, the other protruding towards the micellar core.4 The alkyl chains pointing towards the water phase may interact with the alkyl chains of other counter-ions attached to another micelle, leading to a micelle–micelle contact. To achieve this purpose, the alkyl chain of any quaternary ammonium counter-ion is required to attain a certain length. Accordingly, tetra-n-propyl ammonium bromide is rarely used to investigate CP phenomena in ionic surfactant systems as it bears shorter alkyl chains than tetra-n-butyl ammonium or tetra-n-amyl ammonium salts.

In the case of anionic surfactants, Yu and Xu5 reported the first instance of cloud point behaviour for tetrabutylammonium tetradecyl sulfate surfactant. Following their pioneering work, sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS),6–10 sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS)11 and sodium oleate (NaOA)12 were also investigated. The CP phenomenon was observed in the presence of the hydrophobic salt, Bu4NBr, tetra-n-butylphosphonium bromide (Bu4PBr), tetra-n-amylammonium bromide (Am4NBr), or triethylammonium chloride (Et3NHCl), in which Et3NHCl was only suitable for NaOA and had no common significance.

Gemini surfactants consist of two hydrophilic head groups, two hydrophobic chains and a spacer linked at or near the head groups.13 Compared with traditional single head and single chain surfactants, this special molecular structure may bring out some novel solution properties including the CP behaviour. Firstly, the head groups of gemini surfactants can strongly associate with counterions,14–16 which is a prerequisite for yielding the CP as pointed out by Kalur and Raghavan.12 Secondly, the spacer presented not only determines the molecular geometry but also provides the possibility of introducing some functional group(s) within the head region.17 A complementary attractive force can be induced between the aggregates by these functional groups which may make CP behaviour occur relatively easily. Although gemini surfactants exhibit the possibility of producing CP behaviour, no reports relative to this subject are currently available.

Recently, we have been interested in the gemini surfactant O,O′-bis(sodium 2-dodecylcarboxylate)-p-dibenzenediol, referred to as C12ϕ2C12. The molecular structure of C12ϕ2C12 is shown in Scheme 1. C12ϕ2C12 forms network-like aggregates at a very low concentration.18 With increasing concentration, these aggregates transform into rod-like (even thread-like) micelles without any additives.19 Such unusual aggregation behaviour is caused by the presence of long and rigid dibenzene spacer. In this paper, we further report the CP behaviour of C12ϕ2C12 in the presence of tetra-n-alkylammonium bromide, an organic salt which is rarely used to induce CP behaviour of ionic surfactants because of its lower hydrophobicity.


image file: c5ra18043k-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Chemical structure of the anionic gemini surfactant C12ϕ2C12 containing a dibenzene spacer.

2. Experimental methods

2.1 Materials

O,O′-Bis(sodium 2-dodecylcarboxylate)-p-dibenzenediol, which is referred to as C12ϕ2C12, was synthesized in our laboratory.18 Tetra-n-propylammonium bromide (Pr4NBr) was purchased from Acros and used as received. 1,6-Diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH) was sourced from Aldrich and utilised as a hydrophobic probe. All solutions were prepared using Milli-Q water with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm.

2.2 Methods

CP measurement. Clear solutions containing surfactant and tetra-n-propylammonium bromide were prepared at ambient temperature. These solutions were placed in Pyrex® glass tubes which were then immersed in a temperature controlled bath with a temperature stability of ±0.1 °C. The temperature was subsequently increased until the solution became visually turbid. The transition temperature was taken as the CP. The incremental temperature change near the CP was 0.1 °C min−1. This procedure was repeated three times for each sample and an average value taken as the final CP.
Dynamic light scattering. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) of the micellar solutions was measured with a Brookhaven Instrument which comprised a BI-200SM goniometer, a BI-9000AT digital correlator (522 channels) and a photomultiplier detector. A He–Ne laser rated at 15 mW power and 632.8 nm wavelength was employed as the light source. The measurement temperature was controlled by a thermostatic circulator (PolyScience, USA) with an accuracy of ±0.01 °C. All solutions were filtered through 0.22 μm Millipore filters into cylindrical light scattering cells (o.d. = 25 mm) and were kept for 48 h after filtration to reach equilibrium. The experimental data were analyzed by the CONTIN20,21 program to determine the intensity fraction distributions around the characteristic aggregate sizes. For the double distributions of scattering intensity, a more precise double exponential model (Dblexp)22 was also used.
Steady-state fluorescence measurements. Steady-state fluorescence measurements were carried out with a Hitachi F-4500 spectrofluorometer using 1 cm path length quartz cuvettes. Excitation and emission slits with a band-pass of 1.5 and 20 nm were applied. Fluorescence anisotropy measurements were performed using a Hitachi polarization accessory. The measurement temperature was 25 °C. Anisotropy values were calculated based on the equations:23,24
 
image file: c5ra18043k-t1.tif(1)
where IVV and IVH are the measured fluorescence intensities (after appropriate background subtraction) with the excitation polarizer vertically oriented and emission polarizer vertically and horizontally oriented, respectively. G is the instrumental correction factor and is the ratio of the efficiencies of the detection system for vertically and horizontally polarized light, and is equal to IHV/IHH.
Rheological measurements. Rheological measurements were conducted on an HAAKE RheoStress 6000 stress controlled rheometer with conical concentric cylinders. The cone was made of standard ETC steel with the diameter of 35 mm and cone angle of 2°. The gap between the centre of the cone and plate was 50 μm. The temperature was kept at 25 ± 0.1 °C throughout the experiments. Each sample was kept for 10 min on the plate to reach the equilibrium prior to conducting experiments. Dynamic frequency-sweep measurements were carried out in the linear viscoelastic region of the samples, as determined previously by dynamic strain sweep measurements.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 CP behaviour of C12ϕ2C12

As mentioned in Introduction, tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide (Bu4NBr) was frequently used to generate the CP of anionic surfactants, while tetra-n-propyl-ammonium bromide (Pr4NBr) was generally unsuitable for this purpose due to its shorter alkyl chains. However, in the present case, we observed the CP phenomena of C12ϕ2C12 in the presence of Pr4NBr rather than Bu4NBr, contrarily, the addition of the latter directly led to the precipitation of C12ϕ2C12.

The CP phenomena of the present systems are slightly different with that reported in ref. 12. The physical appearance of one of C12ϕ2C12/Pr4NBr system below and above their CP points is shown in Fig. 1. Below CP, all solutions are homogenous and transparent as pure water. When the temperature was increased to their corresponding CP, the solutions show cloud-like appearance instead of obvious phase separation. This appearance didn't show further change after these solutions are stored at 80 °C for 1 week (80 °C is the temperature that above their CP).


image file: c5ra18043k-f1.tif
Fig. 1 The solution images of C12ϕ2C12/Pr4NBr systems below (left) and above (right) their CP points. (a) Pure water; (b) 5 mmol L−1 C12ϕ2C12; (c) 10 mmol L−1 C12ϕ2C12 and (d) 50 mmol L−1 C12ϕ2C12. The concentration of Pr4NBr is fixed at 500 mmol L−1.

Fig. 2 shows the CP curves of C12ϕ2C12 in the presence of Pr4NBr. Compared with the SDS system as studied by Kumar et al.,7 the present plots presented two obvious features. One was the variation extent. For the C12ϕ2C12 system, the CP rose rapidly at low surfactant concentrations and then tended to a plateau with increasing surfactant concentration. In contrast, the increase of CP with rising SDS concentration was slow over the low concentration range and became faster at higher concentrations, during which no plateau was observed over the range of the added Bu4NBr concentrations. This feature in Fig. 2 may relate to the strong association of C12ϕ2C12 with organic counter-ions since each gemini molecule carried the charged head-groups to a greater extent than was the case in traditional surfactants.14–16 This led to more effective neutralisation for the surface charge of C12ϕ2C12 aggregates in comparison with the SDS case, particularly at low surfactant concentrations where the counter-ions were more excessive at a fixed concentration of Pr4NBr. This satisfied the prerequisite of generating CP behaviour as emphasised by Kalur and Raghavan,12 and may be the reason for the induction of a rapid rise of the CP curve at low surfactant concentrations as shown in Fig. 2.


image file: c5ra18043k-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Variation of CP with concentration of C12ϕ2C12 in the presence of Pr4NBr: □, 300; ○, 400; ▵, 450; ▿, 500; ◊, 800 mmol L−1.

Another feature in Fig. 2 was the response concentration of C12ϕ2C12 to the CP, which was much lower than that of SDS in the presence of identical concentrations of Bu4NBr. For SDS, 50 mmol L−1 was the lowest concentration examined,7 whereas in the present work, the smallest concentration of C12ϕ2C12 was only 3 mmol L−1, nearly 20 times lower than SDS. This was due to the strong ability of geminis to aggregate as mentioned previously. In a salt-free system, the cmc that characterised the ability of surfactant aggregation was in the order of μmol L−1 for C12ϕ2C12 (ref. 18) and 8 mmol L−1 for SDS as measured by surface tension. The former was almost four orders of magnitude lower than the latter. In the presence of salt, the aggregation ability of C12ϕ2C12 could be significantly enhanced. The existence of micelles in the solution was a premise to yield the CP phenomenon and therefore, it was expected that the CP of C12ϕ2C12 occurred at low surfactant concentrations.

3.2 Influence of Pr4NBr on the aggregation of C12ϕ2C12

At 25 °C, C12ϕ2C12 formed network-like aggregates with an average radius of ca. 100 nm in aqueous solution at the cmc (4.6 μmol L−1).18 The mechanism has been attributed to the trans-conformation of C12ϕ2C12 molecule, which extended its alkyl tails toward the opposite directions and thus drove the molecules to associate through the hydrophobic interaction between the extending alkyl tails.18 These network-like aggregates were sensitive to additives which may be the reason that the addition of Bu4NBr produced the precipitate of C12ϕ2C12 in the present case. Comparatively, Pr4NBr was an organic salt with less hydrophobicity. The interaction of Pr4NBr with the network-like aggregates was moderate and therefore favoured to induce the transformation of the network-like aggregates into compact micelles.25 Fig. 3 shows the influence of Pr4NBr addition on aggregate evolution in C12ϕ2C12 solutions at 25 °C. For 10 mmol L−1 C12ϕ2C12 (Fig. 3a), Pr4NBr induced a new intensity-fraction distribution at small size besides the original large size around 100 nm. The minimum Pr4NBr salt concentration that could evoke the transformation of C12ϕ2C12 aggregates appeared characteristic and was defined as the critical salt concentration (CP,LS).
image file: c5ra18043k-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Intensity-fraction distributions measured at a 90° angle and at 25 °C for (a) 10 and (b) 50 mmol L−1 C12ϕ2C12 with and without different concentrations of Pr4NBr, dealt from CONTIN model.

For those bimodal distributions, a more precise approach was to fit the data using a double exponential (Dblexp) model,22 which was described in the ESI (Fig. S1, ESI). Fig. 4a shows a plot of the scattering intensity (I) of small aggregates derived from the Dblexp model as a function of Pr4NBr concentration, in which the critical salt concentration (CP,LS) as shown by arrow, was obtained to be 15.2 mmol L−1. In addition, we carried out a solubilization test using a hydrophobic probe, 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH). Fig. 4b shows the variation of DPH anisotropy (r) with Pr4NBr concentration, in which r rapidly increased after the critical salt concentration CP,DPH. This indicated that DPH was solubilised, demonstrating the existence of core–shell micelles in the solution.23,24 The CP,DPH (15.0 mmol L−1) was consistent with the CP,LS (15.2 mmol L−1), suggesting the small aggregates had a core–shell structure. Therefore, the addition of Pr4NBr induced part of the network-like aggregates to transform into the core–shell micelles. With further increasing concentration of Pr4NBr, the micelles should gradually grow as general,26 which was reflected in their increased sizes (Fig. 3a).


image file: c5ra18043k-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Variation of (a) scattering intensity I of small micelles for 10 mmol L−1 C12ϕ2C12 derived from Dblexp model and (b) anisotropy r of DPH with Pr4NBr concentration at 25 °C.

Similarly, we can also decide that at 50 mmol L−1 C12ϕ2C12, the micelles with core–shell structure have already existed in the salt-free system as indicated by the DLS (Fig. 3b, bottom) where the scattering intensity distribution at smaller sizes has appeared. With the addition of Pr4NBr, as seen in Fig. 3b, the aggregates with small and large sizes grew continuously, resulting in a more and more viscous solution. At Pr4NBr concentrations of 400 and 450 mmol L−1, the systems (Fig. 5a) clearly exhibited shear thinning behaviour of viscosity above the critical shear rate [small gamma, Greek, dot above]c, which demonstrated the existence of threadlike (wormlike) micelles in the solution.27 The dynamic viscoelastic spectra (Fig. 5b) shows that these solutions have Maxwell fluid behaviour, in which the fitting results (solid lines) closely followed the Maxwell model with a single stress relaxation time (τR) in the range of low and medium frequencies according to the following equations:28–30

 
image file: c5ra18043k-t2.tif(2)
 
image file: c5ra18043k-t3.tif(3)
where G′ and G′′ are respectively elastic modulus and viscous modulus, and ω is shear frequency. The deviation of the G′′ from the model at high ω region is another characteristic of threadlike micelles,31 which corresponds to the fact that wormlike micelles are in dynamic equilibrium and there is a rapid breaking and recombination process.32


image file: c5ra18043k-f5.tif
Fig. 5 (a) Steady-state viscosity curves and (b) viscoelastic spectra (filled and open symbols represent elastic modulus G′ and viscous modulus G′′, respectively) for the aqueous C12ϕ2C12 (50 mmol L−1) solutions at a given concentration of Pr4NBr. The solid lines were the fitting results according to the Maxwell model.

In conclusion, at ambient temperatures, the added Pr4NBr partly screened the charges of C12ϕ2C12 head group and reduced the hindrance of aggregation. This led to the transformation of the network-like aggregates into the core–shell micelles with continuously increasing salt concentration. If the core–shell micelles already existed in the solution, as the case at high surfactant concentrations, the addition of Pr4NBr acted to further promote their growth into thread-like micelles.

3.3 Influence of temperature on the aggregation of C12ϕ2C12

Three cases of C12ϕ2C12 at different concentrations (10, 20 and 50 mmol L−1) using a fixed 450 mmol L−1 Pr4NBr concentration were examined to understand the influence of temperature. Fig. 6 shows the intensity-fraction distributions of the three systems measured at a 90° angle. With the rise in temperature, all three cases exhibited similar trends, i.e. the large aggregates rapidly decreased their intensity and finally disappeared after a certain temperature, whilst the small aggregates continuously grew, slowly at lower temperatures and rapidly at higher temperatures. Fig. 7 gives a clearer and direct picture of the size variation of small and large aggregates with temperature, in which the data came from those cases with bimodal intensity distributions and dealt with the Dblexp model (Fig. S2, ESI). This meant that the large aggregates were broken into shorter segments with increasing temperature, which were in agreement with the general temperature effect as reported by other authors.33–36 When the temperatures were close to the CP, the micellar association may occur as revealed in Fig. 7a, where the aggregate sizes increased rapidly.
image file: c5ra18043k-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Intensity-fraction distributions measured at 90° angle and dealt by CONTIN model for C12ϕ2C12 ((a), 10 mmol L−1, (b), 20 mmol L−1, (c), 50 mmol L−1) at different temperatures but at a fixed concentration of 450 mmol L−1 Pr4NBr, the corresponding CP is 67.8 °C, 75.5 °C and 81.5 °C for (a), (b) and (c), respectively.

image file: c5ra18043k-f7.tif
Fig. 7 Variation of apparent hydrodynamic radius (Rh,app) with temperature for C12ϕ2C12 in the presence of 450 mmol L−1 Pr4NBr, where the subscript 1 and 2 represent the Rh,app of (a) small and (b) large aggregates, respectively, according to the Dblexp model.

3.4 CP mechanism for C12ϕ2C12 system

As seen from Fig. 6 and 7, when the temperature was close to the CP, only small aggregates existed in the solution and their sizes increased rapidly (Fig. 7a). Therefore, the CP mechanism of C12ϕ2C12 should be relevant with micelle association.

What was the attractive force driving the micelles to associate? This was a key point to reveal the CP mechanism. As described in Introduction, for anionic surfactant systems, quaternary ammonium counter-ion with a certain length of alkyl chain was always required to generate the CP phenomenon,4 which can screen the charge of the micelles, and also provide an attractive force to pull the micelles together. In the present system, however, the CP was observed in the presence of Pr4NBr. Even though Pr4NBr might neutralise the charge at the micelle surface, it was difficult to effectively achieve the interactions with other counterions attached to another micelle due to the short propyl chains. Evidently, another actor certainly substituted for Pr4NBr to play this role in the micelle association. This actor should be C12ϕ2C12!

As discussed above, C12ϕ2C12 had a tendency to produce trans configurations due to its long, rigid spacer. This tendency can be enhanced with increasing temperature and thus some alkyl tails of the molecules within the micelles might extend towards the solution. When two C12ϕ2C12 micelles approached, those projecting tails associated hydrophobically. Since these projecting tails of C12ϕ2C12 were long sufficiently, such non-covalent tail interactions pulled one micelle to the other. A schematic representation is shown in Fig. 8, which describes the mechanism of the CP in the present system. This was similar with the effect suggested by Menger and Peresypkin,37 in which vesicles formed by zwitter-ionic geminis were linked in this way to generate strings of vesicles. In fact, the vesicle associations were observed in the case of C12ϕ2C12 with the addition of CnNBr (n = 8, 10, 12).38 The present novel behaviour of C12ϕ2C12 benefited from the geometry of its long rigid spacer. This example well exhibits the exquisite property of gemini-type molecular structures in the self-assembly which is intrinsically complex.


image file: c5ra18043k-f8.tif
Fig. 8 Schematic representation of bridging between neighbour gemini micelles by the extending alkyl tails of C12ϕ2C12.

4. Conclusions

The CP phenomena can occur in the aqueous solutions of a carboxylate gemini surfactant C12ϕ2C12 in the presence of Pr4NBr. The addition of Pr4NBr induced the transition of the C12ϕ2C12 network-like aggregates into the compact core–shell micelles and even thread-like micelles. With increasing temperature, large aggregates are broken into short segments. The CP mechanism was relevant with micelle association. During the process, C12ϕ2C12 rather than Pr4NBr provided an attractive force for the micelle–micelle contact. The present result suggests a new origin to generate the attractive forces between the aggregates for the purpose of CP formation, i.e. using the gemini molecule itself, which exhibits the charm of gemini-type molecular structures in the self-assembly.

Acknowledgements

Support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21273040, 21473032) and the Department of Education of Fujian Province (JK2015054) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. J. B. Hayter and M. Zulauf, Colloid Polym. Sci., 1982, 260, 1023–1028 CAS.
  2. P. Mukherjee, S. K. Padhan, S. Dash, S. Patel and B. K. Mishra, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2011, 162, 59–79 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. A. Klaus, G. J. T. Tiddy, R. Rachel, A. P. Trinh, E. Maurer, D. Touraud and W. Kunz, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 4403–4411 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. M. Almgren and S. Swarup, J. Phys. Chem., 1983, 87, 876–881 CrossRef CAS.
  5. Z. J. Yu and G. Z. Xu, J. Phys. Chem., 1989, 93, 7441–7445 CrossRef CAS.
  6. S. Kumar, D. Sharma and K. Din, Langmuir, 2000, 16, 6821–6824 CrossRef CAS.
  7. S. Kumar, D. Sharma, Z. A. Khan and K. Din, Langmuir, 2001, 17, 5813–5816 CrossRef CAS.
  8. S. Kumar, V. K. Aswal, A. Z. Naqvi, P. S. Goyal and K. Din, Langmuir, 2001, 17, 2549–2551 CrossRef CAS.
  9. B. L. Bales and R. Zana, Langmuir, 2004, 20, 1579–1581 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. J. Mata, D. Varade, G. Ghosh and P. Bahadur, Colloids Surf., A, 2004, 245, 69–73 CrossRef CAS.
  11. S. Kumar, D. Sharma, Z. A. Khan and K. Din, Langmuir, 2002, 18, 4205–4209 CrossRef CAS.
  12. G. C. Kalur and S. R. Raghavan, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 8599–8604 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. F. M. Menger and C. A. Littau, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 1451–1452 CrossRef CAS.
  14. J. X. Zhao, Y. S. Deng and X. M. Pei, Colloids Surf., A, 2010, 369, 34–38 CrossRef CAS.
  15. R. Jiang, J. X. Zhao, X. M. Hu, X. M. Pei and L. X. Zhang, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2009, 340, 98–103 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. T. Lu, J. B. Huang, Z. H. Li, S. K. Jia and H. L. Fu, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2008, 112, 2909–2914 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. X. M. Pei, J. X. Zhao, Y. Z. Ye, Y. You and X. L. Wei, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 2953–2960 RSC.
  18. D. H. Xie and J. X. Zhao, Langmuir, 2013, 29, 545–553 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. D. H. Xie, J. X. Zhao and Y. You, Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 6532–6539 RSC.
  20. W. Schartl, Light scattering from polymer solutions and nanoparticle disperions, Springer, London, 2007, pp. 54–95 Search PubMed.
  21. B. Chu, Laser Light Scattering: Basic Principles and Practice, Academic Press, Boston, 1991, 2nd edn, pp. 93–112 Search PubMed.
  22. W. Brown, K. Johansson and M. Almgren, J. Phys. Chem., 1989, 93, 5888–5894 CrossRef.
  23. D. Khatua and J. Dey, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2007, 111, 124–130 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. H. Raghuraman, S. K. Pradhan and A. Chattopadhyay, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 2489–2496 CrossRef CAS.
  25. J. X. Zhao, F. Liu and D. H. Xie, Colloid Polym. Sci., 2015, 293, 3543–3554 Search PubMed.
  26. L. M. Bergström, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2015, 440, 109–118 CrossRef PubMed.
  27. R. G. Shrestha, L. K. Shrestha and K. Aramaki, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2007, 311, 276–284 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. D. P. Acharya, H. Kunieda, Y. Shiba and K. Aratani, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 1790–1797 CrossRef CAS.
  29. M. E. Cates, Macromolecules, 1987, 20, 2289–2296 CrossRef CAS.
  30. R. Granek and M. E. Cates, J. Chem. Phys., 1992, 96, 4758–4767 CrossRef CAS.
  31. A. Khatory, F. Lequeux, F. Kern and S. J. Candau, Langmuir, 1993, 9, 1456–1464 CrossRef CAS.
  32. F. Kern, F. Lequeux, R. Zana and S. J. Candau, Langmuir, 1994, 10, 1714–1723 CrossRef CAS.
  33. S. R. Raghavan and E. W. Kaler, Langmuir, 2001, 17, 300–306 CrossRef CAS.
  34. S. J. Candau, E. Hirsch, R. Zana and M. Delsanti, Langmuir, 1989, 5, 1225–1229 CrossRef CAS.
  35. P. A. Hassan, S. J. Candau, F. Kern and C. Manohar, Langmuir, 1998, 14, 6025–6029 CrossRef CAS.
  36. D. H. Xie, J. X. Zhao, L. Liu, Y. You and X. L. Wei, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., 2013, 29, 1534–1540 CAS.
  37. F. M. Menger and A. V. Peresypkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 5340–5345 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. J. X. Zhao, F. Liu and D. H. Xie, Colloid Polym. Sci., 2015, 293, 3633–3639 CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: PDF file describing details of the intensity-fraction distributions measured at 90° angle for C12ϕ2C12 without and with Pr4NBr at different temperatures dealt from Dblexp model. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra18043k

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.