Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Partially oxidized iridium clusters within dendrimers: size-controlled synthesis and selective hydrogenation of 2-nitrobenzaldehyde

Tatsuya Higaki a, Hirokazu Kitazawa ab, Seiji Yamazoe ab and Tatsuya Tsukuda *ab
aDepartment of Chemistry, School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. E-mail: tsukuda@chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
bElements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts and Batteries (ESICB), Kyoto University, Katsura, Kyoto 615-8520, Japan

Received 21st February 2016 , Accepted 3rd May 2016

First published on 4th May 2016


Abstract

Iridium clusters nominally composed of 15, 30 or 60 atoms were size-selectively synthesized within OH-terminated poly(amidoamine) dendrimers of generation 6. Spectroscopic characterization revealed that the Ir clusters were partially oxidized. All the Ir clusters efficiently converted 2-nitrobenzaldehyde to anthranil and 2-aminobenzaldehyde under atmospheric hydrogen at room temperature in toluene via selective hydrogenation of the NO2 group. The selectivity toward 2-aminobenzaldehyde over anthranil was improved with the reduction of the cluster size. The improved selectivity is ascribed to more efficient reduction than intramolecular heterocyclization of a hydroxylamine intermediate on smaller clusters that have a higher Ir(0)-phase population on the surface.


Iridium nanoparticles (IrNPs) have been applied to various catalytic reactions such as quinoline synthesis,1 CO2 fixation,2 hydrogenation3–6 and aerobic oxidation.7 One of the unique features of IrNPs is the bifunctionality induced by partial oxidation. For example, it is suggested that production of dimethylformamide from CO2, H2 and dimethylamine on partially reduced iridium oxide (IrOx) proceeded efficiently via synergistic activation of H2 and CO2 on the surface of Ir(0) and IrOx, respectively.2 We previously reported that para-substituted nitrobenzenes with other reducible groups such as >C[double bond, length as m-dash]O, –CHO, –CN and –Cl were efficiently and selectively hydrogenated to the corresponding aniline derivatives by using partially oxidized IrNPs (∼2 nm) stabilized with PVP.6 The high selectivity was ascribed to the preferential adsorption of the NO2 group on the IrOx site followed by reduction with H atoms formed by dissociative adsorption of H2 on the Ir(0) site.6 It was also reported that the activity and selectivity of Ir(0) particles for hydrogenation of unsaturated aldehydes to unsaturated alcohols were dramatically improved by modification with ReOx.8 In this regard, the partially oxidized IrNPs can be viewed as a new class of catalysts in which metal (0) NPs are partially covered by metal oxide phase.9 However, the correlation between the structure and catalysis of Ir clusters (diameter < 2 nm) has been observed in only a few cases,10,11 mainly due to the difficulty in their size-controlled synthesis. An open question is how the degree of oxidation and the catalytic performance of Ir clusters are dependent on the cluster size.

Dendrimers have been used as promising nanoscale vessels to generate and stabilize size-controlled metal clusters for catalytic application.12–21 This is because a controlled number of precursor metal ions can be coordinated per dendrimer before the reduction. Recently, the size effect at the atomic level on the catalysis of Pt clusters was demonstrated using phenylazomethine dendrimers as templates.19,21 In the present work, we synthesized Ir clusters nominally composed of 15, 30 or 60 atoms within an OH-terminated poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimer of generation 6 (denoted as Ir[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 hereafter). G6 was selected as a molecular container of the Ir clusters because it has enough number (256) of amine groups for coordination with Ir precursor ions and enough diameter (6.7 nm) to encapsulate the resulting Ir clusters. Ir[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 clusters were deposited on silica22 and applied for catalytic hydrogenation of 2-nitrobenzaldehyde. Here, we focus only on hydrogenation of 2-nitrobenzaldehyde because it is interesting to see whether or not the high selectivity toward the NO2 group is retained when the CHO group is geometrically located even closer to the NO2 group. We found that silica-supported Ir[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 catalysts showed high catalytic activity for selective hydrogenation of the NO2 group under mild conditions (30 °C, 0.1 MPa of H2). The selectivity toward the production of 2-aminobenzaldehyde over anthranil improved with a decrease in the size.

Briefly, Ir[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 clusters were synthesized and characterized as follows. The IrIV ions were coordinated to the amine groups of G6 by mixing the aqueous solutions of K2IrCl6 and G6 with the molar ratio X (X = 15, 30 or 60). Although it was reported that the IrIV ions coordinated to the PAMAM dendrimer were not reduced by either H2 or NaBH4 under ambient conditions,4 we successfully produced Ir clusters by chemical reduction using NaBH4 at 60 °C. The Ir clusters thus produced will be referred to as IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6. For catalytic application, the as-prepared IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 clusters were loaded on silica to obtain IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6/SiO2. All syntheses were conducted in air. Further details on the synthesis and characterization of the Ir clusters are provided in the ESI.

IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 and IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6/SiO2 clusters were characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The absorption spectra of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 (Fig. S1) in water exhibit exponential-like profiles with a peak at ∼280 nm due to the absorption of tertiary amino groups within G6.23 The optical absorption spectra do not exhibit peaks due to IrIII (352, 415 and 561 nm) or IrIV (285, 352, 415 and 561 nm) ions,24,25 indicating that the precursor IrIV ions were completely reduced under our synthesis conditions. Nearly the same spectral profiles imply the similarity of the electronic structures of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6, regardless of the difference in X. The PXRD patterns of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 are shown in Fig. 1a. The diffraction patterns indicate the formation of small Ir(0) nanoparticles with a face-centered cubic (fcc) crystal structure. As expected, the average size of Ir(0) crystallites estimated from the (111) diffraction peaks using the Scherrer equation increases with X (Table 1). The local structure of Ir in IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6/SiO2 clusters was examined by analyzing the X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS). Fig. 1b shows the Fourier-transformed EXAFS spectra at the Ir L3 edge. The peaks in the r ranges of 1.45–1.85 Å and 2.23–2.95 Å are assigned to the Ir–O and Ir–Ir shells, respectively. The results of curve-fitting analysis are summarized in Table S1. The average coordination numbers (CNs) of the Ir–Ir bond of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6/SiO2 (X = 15, 30 and 60) were determined to be 3.0 ± 0.5, 4.9 ± 1.0 and 6.4 ± 1.0, respectively (Table 1). The PXRD and EXAFS results clearly indicate that the cluster size was successfully controlled. Observation of the Ir–O bonds (Fig. 1b) shows that the Ir clusters were partially oxidized. The trend in which the CN values for the Ir–Ir bonds are slightly smaller than those calculated for the cuboctahedra of comparable sizes (5.5 and 7.9 for Ir13 and Ir55, respectively) implies that the IrOx phases were mainly formed on the surface of the Ir(0) cores rather than being distributed homogeneously over the cluster. However, the absence of diffraction peaks for IrOx in the PXRD profiles suggests that the IrOx phase was formed as a thin amorphous-like layer. The formation of the thin IrOx phase on the Ir(0) core is supported by the fact that IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 did not show an absorption peak at ∼580 nm observed for the colloidal IrOx·nH2O nanoparticles (Fig. S1).26 The TEM images of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 (X = 15, 30 and 60) in Fig. 2 show the formation of monodisperse particles ∼1–2 nm in diameter. The absence of larger Ir particles was confirmed by the TEM observation although accurate evaluation of the average diameters is not trivial because of the limited resolution and insufficient number (∼300) of the particles observed.


image file: c6nr01460g-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) PXRD profiles of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 and (b) FT-EXAFS (Ir L3 edge) of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6/SiO2 with X = 15, 30 and 60.

image file: c6nr01460g-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Typical TEM images of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 with X = (a) 15, (b) 30, (c) 60.
Table 1 Structural characteristics of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6
Sample d XRPD/nm CN BE/eV (area%)
Ir–Ir Ir–O
CN = coordination number, BE = binding energy of Ir 4f7/2.
Ir15[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 0.9 3.0 ± 0.5 3.5 ± 0.5 60.1 (48) 61.3 (52)
Ir30[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 1.1 4.9 ± 1.0 4.1 ± 0.7 60.1 (43) 61.3 (57)
Ir60[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 1.5 6.4 ± 1.0 3.6 ± 0.5 60.1 (44) 61.3 (56)


The electronic structures of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 were examined by X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and XPS. In the Ir L3 edge XANES spectra (Fig. 3), the intensity of the white lines of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 is smaller than that of K2IrCl6, but larger than that of bulk Ir, indicating the coexistence of Ir(0) species and the electron-deficient Ir species. Electron-deficient Ir species are presumed to be IrOx since the absence of unreduced Ir ions is confirmed by the UV-Vis spectra (Fig. S1). As shown in Fig. 3, the degree of electron deficiency does not depend on X. This trend is confirmed by the deconvolution of peaks in XPS (Fig. 4 and Table S2): the relative population of the IrOx phase was ∼50% for all the samples (Table 1). It is notable that the population of the IrOx phase was independent of the cluster size although the surface-to-volume ratio decreases with the increase in cluster size. Namely, the cluster surface is not fully oxidized. If we assume that the IrOx phase is formed only on the surface, the constant population of the IrOx phase (Fig. 4) indicates that the population of the IrOx phase on the surface increases with the cluster size. In summary, the IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 clusters consist of monodisperse Ir clusters and the diameter and occupancy of IrOx on the surface increase with X.


image file: c6nr01460g-f3.tif
Fig. 3 XANES (Ir L3 edge) spectra of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 (X = 15, 30, 60).

image file: c6nr01460g-f4.tif
Fig. 4 XPS of IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 with X = (a) 15, (b) 30, (c) 60.

Catalytic hydrogenation of 2-nitrobenzaldehyde was carried out using IrX[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6/SiO2 (X = 15, 30 and 60) in toluene at 30 °C under 0.1 MPa of H2. After 1 h, the reaction products were analyzed by gas chromatography. The results of the catalytic reaction are summarized in Table 2. Two independent batches of experiments give reproducible results and the conversion is ∼100% for all the catalysts. After the reaction, 2-aminobenzaldehyde (2) was obtained as a major product whereas 2-nitrobenzyl alcohol (3) and 2-aminobenzyl alcohol (4) were not produced. In addition to 2, anthranil (1) was formed as a by-product. It was reported that 1 is formed from 2-nitrobenzaldehyde via partial reduction of the NO2 group to the NHOH group, followed by heterocyclization–dehydration reaction with the CHO group (Scheme 1).27,28 Namely, the production of 1 is also associated with the reduction of the NO2 group. Thus, we conclude that the NO2 group was selectively hydrogenated even though the reducible CHO group is located at the ortho position of the NO2 group. After the catalytic reaction was completed, Ir15[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6/SiO2 was collected by filtration. XAFS analysis for Ir15[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6/SiO2 thus collected shows no degradation by catalytic usage (Fig. S2). In addition, we conducted the catalytic reaction using the filtrate under the identical conditions (ESI). The conversion of 2 was negligibly small (<1%), indicating that the reaction did not proceed homogeneously on the leached species if any, but on the cluster surface. Namely, the results in Table 2 reflect the size-dependent catalytic properties of partially-oxidized Ir clusters.


image file: c6nr01460g-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Selective hydrogenation of 2-nitrobenzaldehyde catalyzed by IrX:G6/SiO2.
Table 2 Catalytic hydrogenation of 2-nitrobenzaldehyde

image file: c6nr01460g-u1.tif

Catalyst Conversion (%) Selectivity (%)
1 2 3 4
Ir15[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6/SiO2 98 17 83 <1 0
98 17 83 <1 0
Ir30[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6/SiO2 98 21 79 <1 0
98 24 76 <1 0
Ir60[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6/SiO2 98 42 58 <1 0
98 40 60 <1 0


The mechanism of selective hydrogenation of nitroaromatics to the corresponding anilines by heterogeneous metal catalysts has been extensively studied by experimental and theoretical approaches.27–34 According to these studies, the key to the high selectivity is preferential adsorption of the NO2 group onto highly polarized metal oxide supports via electrostatic interaction. It has been demonstrated that the dissociative adsorption of H2 molecules is the rate-determining step. Based on these findings, we proposed in a previous study on Ir[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]PVP6 that H atoms formed on the Ir(0) site selectively hydrogenate the NO2 group of nitroaromatics adsorbed preferentially onto the IrOx sites. In that study, other reducible functional groups such as –CHO and C[double bond, length as m-dash]C located at the para position with respect to the NO2 group were not reduced. Although the population of the IrOx phase in Ir[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]G6 is much larger than that in Ir[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]PVP (∼10%),6 the selective hydrogenation observed in the present study can be explained by a similar mechanism.

Interestingly, the selectivity toward 2 over 1 increases with the decrease in cluster size. According to the proposed mechanism,27,28 catalytic hydrogenation of the NO2 group to the NH2 group proceeds via an intermediate having a partially reduced NHOH group (Scheme 1). Product 2 is formed by subsequent hydrogenation whereas 1 is formed by intramolecular heterocyclization followed by dehydration. The rate-determining step in the overall reaction is hydrogenation of the NHOH group to form 2.26 Consequently, products 1 and 2 are produced competitively via a common hydroxylamine intermediate. Based on the XPS results (Fig. 4), the population of the Ir(0) phase on the cluster surface increased with the decrease in size. Higher selectivity for the formation of 2 by smaller clusters than larger clusters is explained by more efficient generation of H via dissociative adsorption of H2 on the Ir(0) phase. This explanation is supported by the observation that the selectivity toward 2 by Ir15G6/SiO2 increased from 83 to 98% by increasing the H2 pressure from 0.1 to 0.5 MPa.

Conclusions

In summary, we synthesized partially oxidized Ir clusters with nominal sizes of 15, 30 and 60 atoms by chemical reduction of IrIV ions within OH-terminated poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers of generation 6. The Ir clusters efficiently catalyzed the hydrogenation of 2-nitrobenzaldehyde under mild conditions (30 °C and 0.1 MPa of H2) and yielded two products, 2-aminobenzaldehyde (2) and anthranil (1) by selective hydrogenation of the NO2 group. The branching fraction for the formation of 2 increased with the decrease in cluster size. This size-dependent phenomenon was explained as that the reduction of the hydroxylamine intermediate proceeds more efficiently than intramolecular heterocyclization on smaller clusters having a higher population of the Ir(0) phase.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Shinjiro Takano and Mr Ryo Takahata for their experimental support and useful discussions. This research was financially supported by the Elements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts & Batteries (ESICB), and by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 26248003) and the “Nanotechnology Platform” from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan. We thank Prof. Hiroshi Nishihara and Dr Mariko Miyachi (The University of Tokyo) for providing us with the access to the TEM apparatus. We also thank Dr Kouhei Okitsu (The University of Tokyo) for assistance with the XPS analyses.

Notes and references

  1. L. He, J. Q. Wang, Y. Gong, Y. M. Liu, Y. Cao, H. Y. He and K. N. Fan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 10216 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. Q. Y. Bi, J. D. Lin, Y. M. Liu, S. H. Xie, H. Y. He and Y. Cao, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 9138 RSC.
  3. X. Zuo, H. Liu and C. Yue, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 1999, 147, 63 CrossRef CAS.
  4. Y. M. López-De Jesús, A. Vicente, G. Lafaye, P. Marécot and C. T. Williams, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 13837 Search PubMed.
  5. H. Rojas, G. Díaz, J. J. Martínez, C. Castañeda, A. Gómez-Cortés and J. Arenas-Alatorre, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2012, 363, 122 CrossRef.
  6. Md. J. Sharif, P. Maity, S. Yamazoe and T. Tsukuda, Chem. Lett., 2013, 42, 1023 CrossRef CAS.
  7. A. Yoshida, Y. Mori, T. Ikeda, K. Azemoto and S. Naito, Catal. Today, 2013, 203, 153 CrossRef CAS.
  8. M. Tamura, K. Tokunami, Y. Nakagawa and K. Tomishige, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 7034 RSC.
  9. T. Mitsudome, Y. Mikami, M. Matoba, T. Mizugaki, K. Jitsukawa and K. Kaneda, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 136 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. I. K. Hamdemir, S. Özkar, K.-H. Yih, J. E. Mondloch and R. G. Finke, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 632 CrossRef CAS.
  11. A. Okrut, R. C. Runnebaum, X. Ouyang, J. Lu, C. Aydin, S.-J. Hwang, S. Zhang, O. A. Olatunji-Ojo, K. A. Durkin, D. A. Dixon, B. C. Gates and A. Katz, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2014, 9, 459 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. L. Balogh and D. A. Tomalia, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 7355 CrossRef CAS.
  13. K. Esumi, A. Suzuki, A. Yamahira and K. Torigoe, Langmuir, 2000, 16, 2604 CrossRef CAS.
  14. R. M. Crooks, M. Zhao, L. Sun, V. Chechik and L. K. Yeung, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 181 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. D. Astruc and F. Chardac, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 2991 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. J. Zheng, P. R. Nicovich and R. M. Dickson, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 2007, 58, 409 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. C. A. Witham, W. Huang, C.-K. Tsung, J. N. Kuhn, G. A. Somorjai and F. D. Toste, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 36 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. P. Maity, S. Yamazoe and T. Tsukuda, ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 182 CrossRef CAS; P. Maity, S. Yamazoe and T. Tsukuda, ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 554 CrossRef (corrections).
  19. T. Imaoka, H. Kitazawa, W.-J. Chun, S. Omura, K. Albrecht and K. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 13089 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. Z. Maeno, T. Mitsudome, T. Mizugaki, K. Jitsukawa and K. Kaneda, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 6526 RSC.
  21. T. Imaoka, H. Kitazawa, W.-J. Chun and K. Yamamoto, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 9810 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. H. Lang, R. A. May, B. L. Iversen and B. D. Chandler, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 14832 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. S. Pande and R. M. Crooks, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 9609 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. A. A. El-Awady, E. J. Bounsail and C. S. Barner, Inorg. Chem., 1967, 6, 79 CrossRef CAS.
  25. L. Moggi, G. Varani, M. F. Manfrin and V. Balzani, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1970, 4, 335 CrossRef CAS.
  26. Y. Zhao, E. A. Hernandez-Page, N. M. Vargas-Barbosa, J. L. Dysart and T. E. Mallouk, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2011, 2, 402 CrossRef CAS.
  27. H.-U. Blaser, H. Steiner and M. Studer, ChemCatChem, 2009, 1, 210 CrossRef CAS.
  28. J. Chauhan and S. Fletcher, Tetrahedron Lett., 2012, 53, 4951 CrossRef CAS.
  29. A. Corma and P. Serna, Science, 2006, 313, 332 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. M. Boronat, P. Concepción, A. Corma, S. González, F. Illas and P. Serna, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 16230 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. A. Corma, P. Serna, P. Concepción and J. J. Calvino, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 8748 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. K.-i. Shimizu, Y. Miyamoto, T. Kawasaki, T. Tanji, Y. Tai and A. Satsuma, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 17803 CAS.
  33. K. Shimizu, Y. Miyamoto and A. Satsuma, J. Catal., 2010, 270, 86 CrossRef CAS.
  34. Md. J. Sharif, S. Yamazoe and T. Tsukuda, Top. Catal., 2014, 57, 1049 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c6nr01460g

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.