Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Ring opening metathesis polymerisation of a new bio-derived monomer from itaconic anhydride and furfuryl alcohol

Yinjuan Bai ab, Mario De bruyn a, James H. Clark a, Jennifer R. Dodson a, Thomas J. Farmer *a, Mathilde Honoré ac, Ian D. V. Ingram a, Mohamed Naguib ad, Adrian C. Whitwood a and Michael North a
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. E-mail: thomas.farmer@york.ac.uk
bKey Laboratory of Synthetic and Natural Functional Molecule Chemistry of Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry & Materials Science, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710127, PR China
cInstitut National des Sciences Appliquées, Avenue de l'Université, 76800 Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, France
dPolymer & Pigments Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt

Received 2nd March 2016 , Accepted 1st June 2016

First published on 1st June 2016


Abstract

A new oxa-norbornene bio-based lactone obtained from the 100% atom economic reaction of furfuryl alcohol and itaconic anhydride via a tandem Diels–Alder addition and lactonisation is presented. Esterification of the resulting acid gives a monomer for the production of a bio-based polymer with low polydispersity and well controlled molecular weight via ring-opening metathesis polymerisation (ROMP).


Introduction

The development of novel functionalised bio-based molecules via facile, green synthetic routes is a major challenge of modern synthetic chemistry. There is interest in the use of furan-based compounds for the development of platform molecules and polymers due to their aromatic and dienic character, large structural variation and their easy accessibility from renewable resources.1,2 Furfural (2-furancarboxyaldehyde) is industrially produced (ca 200[thin space (1/6-em)]000 tons per year) by the acid-catalysed dehydration of pentoses, with some being subsequently reduced to furfuryl alcohol 1. However, these compounds can be unstable due to uncontrolled self-condensation reactions occurring in the presence of acids or heat. Itaconic acid is another bio-derived platform molecule with growing prevalence in the field of polymer synthesis and is particularly interesting due to its functionality, containing both a dicarboxylic acid and a carbon–carbon double bond.3–6 Production of itaconic acid by the fungal fermentation of glucose using Aspergillus terreus is predicted to grow to 400[thin space (1/6-em)]000 tons per year by 2020.7–9 Radical polymerisation of itaconic acid and many of its esters is well known. However, as homopolymers the glass transition temperatures (Tg) of poly(itaconate alkyl esters) are often below room temperature,10,11 limiting their usefulness for many applications. To alleviate this problem copolymers of these monomers with conventional acrylates are often prepared.12,13 Poly(itaconic acid) and its salts are useful hydrophilic materials in commercial absorbents, as a co-monomer for styrene–butadiene rubber latexes, and in chelating agents.8 Unsurprisingly, the diacid functionality of itaconic acid, or its corresponding anhydride, has been used to make polyesters.14–16 However, few groups have studied the functionalisation of itaconic acid with more complex bio-based compounds, particularly furanic structures. This opens up the possibility for the development of new interesting fully bio-derived functionalised monomers and polymers.

Results and discussion

As benzylic and other aromatic itaconate esters are known to produce polymers with higher Tg than their alkyl equivalents,17 we attempted to synthesise a bio-derived analogue of these by preparing itaconate esters with furfuryl alcohol 1. However, when 1 was reacted with itaconic anhydride 2 (Scheme 1), at room temperature in acetonitrile solution for 24 hours, a crystalline solid formed that proved to be a novel oxa-norbornene structure 5 (61%), generated via a 100% atom economical tandem ring-opening and Diels–Alder addition, rather than the expected mono-esters 3a or 3b.
image file: c6gc00623j-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Preparation of oxanorbornene–lactone monomer 5 via one-pot, tandem Diels–Alder and lactonisation reactions.

Although extensive work has previously been conducted on the reaction of maleic anhydride and furan derivatives, particularly for the formation of phthalic anhydrides via Diels–Alder addition and dehydration,18–20 the reaction of 1 and 2 has not, to our knowledge, previously been studied.

Further tests showed that the reaction also occurred in the absence of solvent (68%), with the product 5 still precipitating direct from the neat reaction mixture. If necessary, the crude product can be recrystallized from acetone or ethanol. Acid 5 was found to be extremely stable, showing no degradation over several weeks when stored under ambient conditions.

Analysis of the product by NMR spectroscopy clearly showed that the intended mono-ester 3a was absent, as were starting materials 1 and 2. However, both mass spectrometry and elemental analysis showed the product formed had the same molecular formula as 3a and 3b, leading us to consider other potential addition reactions.

Furans are well known dienes for Diels–Alder additions, including the reaction of maleic anhydride with 1.18,19,21 Therefore, a combined Diels–Alder addition and ring-opening reaction to form tricyclic acid 5 was predicted to have occurred (Fig. S1) and was shown to fit the observed spectroscopic data. Detailed analysis by NMR spectroscopy of the crude, purified and recrystallised products indicated the formation of a single isomer (exo), with only minor by-products attributed to polymerised furfuryl alcohol. Single crystal X-ray diffraction unambiguously identified the product as 5 (Fig. 1). The mechanism of this reaction is more interesting than it appears at first glance. Previous studies show that the reaction of itaconic anhydride with an alcohol regioselectively gives the ester furthest from the alkene functionality, in this case ester 3a.22–24 However, the lactone present in 5 is the result of the esterification occurring at the carboxylic acid group adjacent to the alkene.


image file: c6gc00623j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Single crystal X-ray structure of the isolated oxa-norbornene acid 5.

Presently it is not known whether the esterification reaction precedes the Diels–Alder cycloaddition, yielding intermediate 3b, or whether the Diels–Alder cycloaddition occurs first, giving intermediate 4, followed by the formation of a cyclic lactone 5. A preliminary kinetic study proved inconclusive as neither of intermediates 3b or 4 were observed as the reaction progressed. It would therefore seem likely that the driving force for the observed selectivity must be the crystallisation of this specific isomer from the reaction mixture. Interestingly, the formation of the intermolecular Diels–Alder adduct between maleic anhydride and various furfuryl alcohols to give an oxa-bicyclic product occurs under similar conditions to those used in this reaction.18 However, the retro-Diels–Alder addition is facile at elevated temperatures or under acidic conditions and the concurrent ring-opening of the anhydride requires either the addition of moisture or a multi-day reaction.18,21 In some instances oxa-norbornene derivatives are known to autoaromatise via elimination of water, though this is not possible in the case of compound 5 due to the presence of tetrasubstitued carbon atoms within the six-membered ring.

Oxa-norbornene derivatives formed from intramolecular Diels–Alder reactions of furans are known to be valuable intermediates for the production of biologically active compounds.25–29 Crucially, however, oxa-norbornenes are also capable of undergoing ring-opening metathesis polymerisation (ROMP). As obtained, acid 5 did not undergo ROMP in THF using any of the commercially available Grubbs catalysts (1st, 2nd or 3rd generations). Hence, protection of the carboxylic acid was carried out via esterification with methanol to give ester 6 (Scheme 2), with the product being purified via solvent extraction with water and either dichloromethane (77% yield) or ethyl acetate (62%).


image file: c6gc00623j-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Esterification of 5 with methanol to produce ROMP monomer 6.

While Grubbs 1st generation catalyst was again found to be inactive when using 6, the polymerisation did proceed successfully in dichloroethane (DCE) using both Grubbs 2nd generation and Hoveyda–Grubbs catalysts (H-G) (Scheme 3). To the best of our knowledge this is the first reported case of ROMP on a norbornene or oxa-norbornene molecule of this class where the bridgehead is substituted.


image file: c6gc00623j-s3.tif
Scheme 3 ROMP of ester 6 to give homopolymer 7.

Although homopolymerisation of monomer 6 occurred successfully under homogeneous conditions in DCE, with nearly full conversion, the polymer obtained (7) after end-capping with ethyl vinyl ether was insoluble in all solvents tested. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis of 7 gave no detectable Tg while the temperature of 10% decomposition (TD10) was determined as 358 °C (Fig. S10). To address the issue of solubility, copolymerisation of monomer 6 and commercially available dimethyl endo-cis-5-norbornene-2,3-dicarboxylate 8 was investigated and resulted in the formation of a soluble copolymers (Scheme 4). As the solubility of this copolymer hinges on the content of comonomer 8 it was subsequently established that a minimum content of 10 wt% is required to afford good solubility to the copolymer.


image file: c6gc00623j-s4.tif
Scheme 4 ROMP of monomer 6 and norbornene 8 to give copolymer 9.

After polymerization, the fused lactone ring of 6 remained intact as elucidated by DRIFT and NMR spectroscopy.

GPC analysis showed that the soluble random copolymers have narrow molecular weight distributions indicative of a well-controlled polymerization process (see Table 1). As shown in Fig. 2, there was a linear relationship between the copolymer molecular weight and the [catalyst]/[monomer] ratio which is denotive of a living polymerisation. DSC revealed that the polymers were amorphous and had glass transition temperatures ranging from 158 to 163 °C, while STA gave a TD10 of 370 °C (Fig. S10).


image file: c6gc00623j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Plot of the molecular weight versus the [monomers]/[catalyst] ratio for copolymers of 6 and 8.
Table 1 Molecular weight and thermal analysis of random copolymers 9
[6]:[8]:[i] Reaction time (h) Conv.% M n(calc.) M n(GPC) M w(GPC) PDI T g
The polymerization was carried out in 1,2-dichloroethane at room temperature, GPC was carried out in THF at 25 °C and calibrated relative to polystyrene standards.a Reaction temperature 40 °C.
25[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]25[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 16 100 10[thin space (1/6-em)]850 9500 11[thin space (1/6-em)]000 1.15 158
50[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]50[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 24 100 21[thin space (1/6-em)]700 21[thin space (1/6-em)]500 23[thin space (1/6-em)]700 1.11 159
100[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]100[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 48 97 42[thin space (1/6-em)]000 45[thin space (1/6-em)]200 53[thin space (1/6-em)]200 1.17 161
200[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]200[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1a 48 95 82[thin space (1/6-em)]500 63[thin space (1/6-em)]200 80[thin space (1/6-em)]800 1.27 163


Although DCE has been a common solvent for this type of polymerisation, its current classification by sections of industry as highly hazardous and under REACH as a substance of very high concern makes future use as an industrial solvent very unlikely. Therefore, ROMP of monomer 6 was attempted using dimethyl carbonate (DMC), diethyl carbonate (DEC), tetrahydrofuran (THF) and ethyl acetate as the solvent. 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran, which is derivable from hemicellulose, was also investigated but proved to be a poor solvent for the monomer. As for the materials made in DCE, homopolymers prepared in these solvents were insoluble, therefore 50[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]50 copolymers were prepared. In each case, the molecular weight was very low (Table 2), with the partially formed polymer precipitating from solution in both ethyl acetate and THF. In DMC the polymer remained in solution during the reaction but only low molecular weight material (Mn = 4000 g mol−1) was obtained. Results in DEC were somewhat more favourable, with the polymer reaching an Mn of 8500 g mol−1, while extending the reaction time to 72 hours increased this further to 14[thin space (1/6-em)]200 g mol−1. These results indicate that the carbonate solvent is likely coordinating to the ruthenium atom of the catalyst and slowing the rate of reaction relative to DCE.

Table 2 Molecular weights obtained for preparation of copolymer 9 in various solvents
Solvent M n M w PDI
The polymerization using a 50[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]50[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 molar ratio of monomers 6[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]8[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]Grubbs 2nd generation catalyst was carried out at room temperature for 24 hours, molecular weights were obtained by GPC in THF at 25 °C and calibrated relative to polystyrene standards.a Reaction time extended to 72 hours.
Calculated 21[thin space (1/6-em)]700 1
DCE 21[thin space (1/6-em)]500 23[thin space (1/6-em)]700 1.11
Ethyl acetate 2300 2400 1.08
THF 3600 5100 1.40
DMC 4100 5600 1.40
DEC 8600 9700 1.12
DECa 14[thin space (1/6-em)]200 15[thin space (1/6-em)]700 1.11


Conclusions

In this work we have demonstrated the unusual, 100% atom economic, tandem Diels–Alder cycloaddition and lactonisation reaction between itaconic anhydride 1 and furfuryl alcohol 2 to a versatile fused-ring oxa-norbornene derivative 5. Moreover as itaconic acid and furfuryl alcohol are regarded as key platform molecules for the future bio-based chemical economy, this molecule can be considered fully bio-derivable. Additionally it is shown that the methyl ester 6 readily undergoes ROMP to produce a fully bio-derived and novel polymer, and can form copolymers with other suitable ROMP monomers.

Acknowledgements

M. Naguib would like to thank the Science & Technology Development Fund (STDF), the Egypt and the British Council, and the British Embassy for their financial support through the Newton–Mosharafa programme. Y. Bai would like to thank the State Scholarship Fund of China Scholarship Council for their support of her visiting fellowship at York (Scholarship no. 201508615069). The authors would also like to thank the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for funding this research through the grant EP/L017393/1.

Notes and references

  1. J.-P. Lange, E. van der Heide, J. van Buijtenen and R. Price, ChemSusChem, 2012, 5, 150–166 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. C. Moreau, M. N. Belgacem and A. Gandini, Top. Catal., 2004, 27, 11–30 CrossRef CAS.
  3. L. Corici, A. Pellis, V. Ferrario, C. Ebert, S. Cantone and L. Gardossi, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2015, 357, 1763–1774 CrossRef CAS.
  4. A. Pellis, L. Corici, L. Sinigoi, N. D'Amelio, D. Fattor, V. Ferrario, C. Ebert and L. Gardossi, Green Chem., 2015, 17, 1756–1766 RSC.
  5. J. Dai, S. Ma, X. Liu, L. Han, Y. Wu, X. Dai and J. Zhu, Prog. Org. Coat., 2015, 78, 49–54 CrossRef CAS.
  6. T. J. Farmer, J. H. Clark, D. J. Macquarrie, J. K. Ogunjobi and R. L. Castle, Polym. Chem., 2016, 7, 1650–1658 RSC.
  7. M. Okabe, D. Lies, S. Kanamasa and E. Y. Park, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2009, 84, 597–606 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. Weastra, WP 8.1. Determination of market potential for selected platform chemicals: Itaconic acid, Succinic acid, 2,5-Furandicarboxylic acid, 2012 Search PubMed.
  9. T. Willke and K. D. Vorlop, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2001, 56, 289–295 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. A. Leon, L. Gargallo, A. Horta and D. Radić, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys., 1989, 27, 2337–2345 CrossRef CAS.
  11. F. López-Carrasquero, A. Martínez de Ilarduya, M. Cárdenas, M. Carrillo, M. A. Luisa Arnal, E. Laredo, C. Torres, B. Méndez and A. J. Müller, Polymer, 2003, 44, 4969–4979 CrossRef.
  12. K. Satoh, D. H. Lee, K. Nagai and M. Kamigaito, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2014, 35, 161–167 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. E. Kassi, E. Loizou, L. Porcar and C. S. Patrickios, Eur. Polym. J., 2011, 47, 816–822 CrossRef CAS.
  14. A. Takasu, M. Ito, Y. Inai, T. Hirabayashi and Y. Nishimura, Polym. J., 1999, 31, 961–969 CrossRef CAS.
  15. T. Tang, T. Moyori and A. Takasu, Macromolecules, 2013, 46, 5464–5472 CrossRef CAS.
  16. T. J. Farmer, R. L. Castle, J. H. Clark and D. J. Macquarrie, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2015, 16, 14912–14932 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. H.-Z. Ma and G.-X. Ye, J. Zhejiang Univ., Sci., A, 2007, 8, 991–998 CrossRef CAS.
  18. S. Thiyagarajan, H. C. Genuino, M. Śliwa, J. C. van der Waal, E. de Jong, J. van Haveren, B. M. Weckhuysen, P. C. A. Bruijnincx and D. S. van Es, ChemSusChem, 2015, 8, 3052–3056 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. E. Mahmoud, D. A. Watson and R. F. Lobo, Green Chem., 2014, 16, 167–175 RSC.
  20. Y. Tachibana, S. Kimura and K.-I. Kasuya, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5, 8249 CrossRef PubMed.
  21. A. Pelter and B. Singaram, Tetrahedron Lett., 1982, 23, 245–248 CrossRef CAS.
  22. E. Sagot, D. S. Pickering, X. Pu, M. Umberti, T. B. Stensbøl, B. Nielsen, M. Chapelet, J. Bolte, T. Gefflaut and L. Bunch, J. Med. Chem., 2008, 51, 4093–4103 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. P. Ferraboschi, S. Casati, P. Grisenti and E. Santaniello, Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 3251–3258 CrossRef CAS.
  24. C. Kuheli, F. Cristina, N. Patrizia, P. Giuliana and V. Ennio, Lett. Org. Chem., 2010, 7, 245–248 CrossRef.
  25. T. Butz and J. Sauer, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1997, 8, 703–714 CrossRef CAS.
  26. M. E. Jung and J. Gervay, Tetrahedron Lett., 1988, 29, 2429–2432 CrossRef CAS.
  27. O. Nieto-García and R. Alonso, J. Org. Chem., 2013, 78, 2564–2570 CrossRef PubMed.
  28. F. I. Zubkov, E. V. Nikitina, T. R. Galeev, V. P. Zaytsev, V. N. Khrustalev, R. A. Novikov, D. N. Orlova and A. V. Varlamov, Tetrahedron, 2014, 70, 1659–1690 CrossRef CAS.
  29. A. Padwa and A. C. Flick, in Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry, ed. A. R. Katritzky, Elsevier Academic Press Inc., San Diego, 2013, vol. 110, pp. 1–41 Search PubMed.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 1454993. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c6gc00623j
Crystallographic data for compound 5 has been submitted to CCDC and given code CCDC 1454993. All data used in the preparation of this manuscript is contained within this document, the ESI or available via a depository (DOI: 10.15124ee9b6f2f-1409-4343-b855-bd5af8d97bc7).

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.