Yinjuan
Bai
ab,
Mario
De bruyn
a,
James H.
Clark
a,
Jennifer R.
Dodson
a,
Thomas J.
Farmer
*a,
Mathilde
Honoré
ac,
Ian D. V.
Ingram
a,
Mohamed
Naguib
ad,
Adrian C.
Whitwood
a and
Michael
North
a
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. E-mail: thomas.farmer@york.ac.uk
bKey Laboratory of Synthetic and Natural Functional Molecule Chemistry of Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry & Materials Science, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710127, PR China
cInstitut National des Sciences Appliquées, Avenue de l'Université, 76800 Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, France
dPolymer & Pigments Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
First published on 1st June 2016
A new oxa-norbornene bio-based lactone obtained from the 100% atom economic reaction of furfuryl alcohol and itaconic anhydride via a tandem Diels–Alder addition and lactonisation is presented. Esterification of the resulting acid gives a monomer for the production of a bio-based polymer with low polydispersity and well controlled molecular weight via ring-opening metathesis polymerisation (ROMP).
![]() | ||
Scheme 1 Preparation of oxanorbornene–lactone monomer 5 via one-pot, tandem Diels–Alder and lactonisation reactions. |
Although extensive work has previously been conducted on the reaction of maleic anhydride and furan derivatives, particularly for the formation of phthalic anhydrides via Diels–Alder addition and dehydration,18–20 the reaction of 1 and 2 has not, to our knowledge, previously been studied.
Further tests showed that the reaction also occurred in the absence of solvent (68%), with the product 5 still precipitating direct from the neat reaction mixture. If necessary, the crude product can be recrystallized from acetone or ethanol. Acid 5 was found to be extremely stable, showing no degradation over several weeks when stored under ambient conditions.
Analysis of the product by NMR spectroscopy clearly showed that the intended mono-ester 3a was absent, as were starting materials 1 and 2. However, both mass spectrometry and elemental analysis showed the product formed had the same molecular formula as 3a and 3b, leading us to consider other potential addition reactions.
Furans are well known dienes for Diels–Alder additions, including the reaction of maleic anhydride with 1.18,19,21 Therefore, a combined Diels–Alder addition and ring-opening reaction to form tricyclic acid 5 was predicted to have occurred (Fig. S1†) and was shown to fit the observed spectroscopic data. Detailed analysis by NMR spectroscopy of the crude, purified and recrystallised products indicated the formation of a single isomer (exo), with only minor by-products attributed to polymerised furfuryl alcohol. Single crystal X-ray diffraction unambiguously identified the product as 5 (Fig. 1).‡ The mechanism of this reaction is more interesting than it appears at first glance. Previous studies show that the reaction of itaconic anhydride with an alcohol regioselectively gives the ester furthest from the alkene functionality, in this case ester 3a.22–24 However, the lactone present in 5 is the result of the esterification occurring at the carboxylic acid group adjacent to the alkene.
Presently it is not known whether the esterification reaction precedes the Diels–Alder cycloaddition, yielding intermediate 3b, or whether the Diels–Alder cycloaddition occurs first, giving intermediate 4, followed by the formation of a cyclic lactone 5. A preliminary kinetic study proved inconclusive as neither of intermediates 3b or 4 were observed as the reaction progressed. It would therefore seem likely that the driving force for the observed selectivity must be the crystallisation of this specific isomer from the reaction mixture. Interestingly, the formation of the intermolecular Diels–Alder adduct between maleic anhydride and various furfuryl alcohols to give an oxa-bicyclic product occurs under similar conditions to those used in this reaction.18 However, the retro-Diels–Alder addition is facile at elevated temperatures or under acidic conditions and the concurrent ring-opening of the anhydride requires either the addition of moisture or a multi-day reaction.18,21 In some instances oxa-norbornene derivatives are known to autoaromatise via elimination of water, though this is not possible in the case of compound 5 due to the presence of tetrasubstitued carbon atoms within the six-membered ring.
Oxa-norbornene derivatives formed from intramolecular Diels–Alder reactions of furans are known to be valuable intermediates for the production of biologically active compounds.25–29 Crucially, however, oxa-norbornenes are also capable of undergoing ring-opening metathesis polymerisation (ROMP). As obtained, acid 5 did not undergo ROMP in THF using any of the commercially available Grubbs catalysts (1st, 2nd or 3rd generations). Hence, protection of the carboxylic acid was carried out via esterification with methanol to give ester 6 (Scheme 2), with the product being purified via solvent extraction with water and either dichloromethane (77% yield) or ethyl acetate (62%).
While Grubbs 1st generation catalyst was again found to be inactive when using 6, the polymerisation did proceed successfully in dichloroethane (DCE) using both Grubbs 2nd generation and Hoveyda–Grubbs catalysts (H-G) (Scheme 3). To the best of our knowledge this is the first reported case of ROMP on a norbornene or oxa-norbornene molecule of this class where the bridgehead is substituted.
Although homopolymerisation of monomer 6 occurred successfully under homogeneous conditions in DCE, with nearly full conversion, the polymer obtained (7) after end-capping with ethyl vinyl ether was insoluble in all solvents tested. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis of 7 gave no detectable Tg while the temperature of 10% decomposition (TD10) was determined as 358 °C (Fig. S10†). To address the issue of solubility, copolymerisation of monomer 6 and commercially available dimethyl endo-cis-5-norbornene-2,3-dicarboxylate 8 was investigated and resulted in the formation of a soluble copolymers (Scheme 4). As the solubility of this copolymer hinges on the content of comonomer 8 it was subsequently established that a minimum content of 10 wt% is required to afford good solubility to the copolymer.
After polymerization, the fused lactone ring of 6 remained intact as elucidated by DRIFT and NMR spectroscopy.
GPC analysis showed that the soluble random copolymers have narrow molecular weight distributions indicative of a well-controlled polymerization process (see Table 1). As shown in Fig. 2, there was a linear relationship between the copolymer molecular weight and the [catalyst]/[monomer] ratio which is denotive of a living polymerisation. DSC revealed that the polymers were amorphous and had glass transition temperatures ranging from 158 to 163 °C, while STA gave a TD10 of 370 °C (Fig. S10†).
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 Plot of the molecular weight versus the [monomers]/[catalyst] ratio for copolymers of 6 and 8. |
[6]:[8]:[i] | Reaction time (h) | Conv.% | M n(calc.) | M n(GPC) | M w(GPC) | PDI | T g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The polymerization was carried out in 1,2-dichloroethane at room temperature, GPC was carried out in THF at 25 °C and calibrated relative to polystyrene standards.a Reaction temperature 40 °C. | |||||||
25![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 100 | 10![]() |
9500 | 11![]() |
1.15 | 158 |
50![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 100 | 21![]() |
21![]() |
23![]() |
1.11 | 159 |
100![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
48 | 97 | 42![]() |
45![]() |
53![]() |
1.17 | 161 |
200![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
48 | 95 | 82![]() |
63![]() |
80![]() |
1.27 | 163 |
Although DCE has been a common solvent for this type of polymerisation, its current classification by sections of industry as highly hazardous and under REACH as a substance of very high concern makes future use as an industrial solvent very unlikely. Therefore, ROMP of monomer 6 was attempted using dimethyl carbonate (DMC), diethyl carbonate (DEC), tetrahydrofuran (THF) and ethyl acetate as the solvent. 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran, which is derivable from hemicellulose, was also investigated but proved to be a poor solvent for the monomer. As for the materials made in DCE, homopolymers prepared in these solvents were insoluble, therefore 50:
50 copolymers were prepared. In each case, the molecular weight was very low (Table 2), with the partially formed polymer precipitating from solution in both ethyl acetate and THF. In DMC the polymer remained in solution during the reaction but only low molecular weight material (Mn = 4000 g mol−1) was obtained. Results in DEC were somewhat more favourable, with the polymer reaching an Mn of 8500 g mol−1, while extending the reaction time to 72 hours increased this further to 14
200 g mol−1. These results indicate that the carbonate solvent is likely coordinating to the ruthenium atom of the catalyst and slowing the rate of reaction relative to DCE.
Solvent | M n | M w | PDI |
---|---|---|---|
The polymerization using a 50![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Calculated | 21![]() |
— | 1 |
DCE | 21![]() |
23![]() |
1.11 |
Ethyl acetate | 2300 | 2400 | 1.08 |
THF | 3600 | 5100 | 1.40 |
DMC | 4100 | 5600 | 1.40 |
DEC | 8600 | 9700 | 1.12 |
DECa | 14![]() |
15![]() |
1.11 |
Footnotes |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 1454993. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c6gc00623j |
‡ Crystallographic data for compound 5 has been submitted to CCDC and given code CCDC 1454993. All data used in the preparation of this manuscript is contained within this document, the ESI or available via a depository (DOI: 10.15124ee9b6f2f-1409-4343-b855-bd5af8d97bc7). |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |