Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: The impact of doping rates on the morphologies of silver and gold nanowires grown in helium nanodroplets

Alexander Volk a, Philipp Thaler a, Daniel Knez b, Andreas W. Hauser *a, Johannes Steurer a, Werner Grogger b, Ferdinand Hofer b and Wolfgang E. Ernst *a
aInstitute of Experimental Physics, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 16, A-8010 Graz, Austria. E-mail: andreas.w.hauser@gmail.com; wolfgang.ernst@tugraz.at; Fax: +43 (316) 873 108140; Tel: +43 (316) 873 8157 Tel: +43 (316) 873 8140
bInstitute for Electron Microscopy and Nanoanalysis & Graz Centre for Electron Microscopy, Graz University of Technology, Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, Austria

Received 21st December 2015 , Accepted 21st December 2015

First published on 5th January 2016


Abstract

Correction for ‘The impact of doping rates on the morphologies of silver and gold nanowires grown in helium nanodroplets’ by Alexander Volk et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, DOI: 10.1039/c5cp06248a.


Due to a unit conversion error, the authors would like to correct the values for ttrap given in Table 2 of the published article, as seen in the amended Table below.
Table 2 Time ttrap until particles get trapped by a vortex due to the attractive force given by eqn (6) and (7). dD,α is calculated assuming an initial HeN size of [N with combining overline] = 1.7 × 1010 atoms. [s with combining overline] is calculated using eqn (8) and dD,α
Element α d D/nm t trap/μs
Ag 0.75 720 24
0.2 1060 52
Au 0.75 720 33
0.2 1060 71
0.04 1130 80


These changes of ttrap affect some of the statements in the published article. Most notably, ttrap is now shorter than the pickup process that takes place over the length of the pickup cell. The so-called pickup time just means that during 130 μs new atoms are added. At first sight, one is tempted to assume a more complex growth process due to simultaneous effects of doping, cluster formation, and vortex trapping. However, this is not the case, since cluster formation times are still shorter than vortex trapping times ttrap. In our cluster growth model following eqn (2) and (3) of the article, metal clusters of 100 atoms for light doping (α = 0.2) and 1000 atoms for heavy doping (α = 0.75) have formed already within ≈1 μs after pickup. The size distribution in Fig. 7 obtains its final shape very quickly and the changes between 30 μs (red curve) and 150 μs (orange curve) reflect only the subsequent growth due to atoms added over the 130 μs pickup time. Most of the ‘newcomers’ will become embedded into that stable cluster size distribution before they are getting trapped in a vortex (compare the envelopes at 130 μs (green curve) and 150 μs in Fig. 7 of the main article). A slight shift of the maximum in the distribution functions towards larger particles with increasing time stems from the higher collision rates which occur due to the reduction of the droplet volume via He evaporation.

Due to this fact, the final morphology of most particles is still determined before they get captured by vortices. Our conclusions on the morphologies of the nanowires remain the same and are in agreement with the experimental results observed in the HRTEM pictures.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © the Owner Societies 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.