D.
Christopher Braddock
*,
Areeb
Mahtey
,
Henry S.
Rzepa
and
Andrew J. P.
White
Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. E-mail: c.braddock@imperial.ac.uk; Fax: +44 (0)2075945805; Tel: +44 (0)2075945772
First published on 30th August 2016
The first stable bromoallene oxides were obtained by the DMDO epoxidation of 1-bromo-1,3-di-tert-alkylallenes, producing the first crystalline allene oxide of any kind. The epoxidations are regioselective for the bromine-bearing Δ1,2 alkene, and also face selective producing single diastereomer E-olefin products.
Bromoallene 7 was prepared by the initial lithiation of terminal alkyne 10 and addition to adamantanecarboxaldehyde§ to give propargylic alcohol 11 (Scheme 1). Temperature control in this transformation proved critical, otherwise significant quantities of ketone 12 and 1-adamantanemethanol were formed.¶|| Using the conditions of Corey,13 alcohol 11 was transformed into bromoallene 7 along with the expected, but now separable, propargylic bromide 13.** Next, the action of the carbon tetrachloride–triphenylphosphine reagent combination14 on adamantanecarboxaldehyde as a α,α,α-trisubstituted aldehyde provided ready access to vinyldichloride 1415 free from any complicating dichloroalkane formation.16 Corey–Fuchs type acetylide anion formation,17 and in situ trapping18 with pivaldehyde and adamantanecarboxaldehyde gave propargylic alcohols 15 and 17 respectively in good yields.†† Bromoallenes 8 and 9 were subsequently obtained by subsequent reaction with thionyl bromide along with the corresponding expected, and again separable, propargylic bromides 16 and 18.‡‡
The incorporation of adamantyl groupings rendered the three bromoallenes 7–9 to be solid, bromoallene 9 proved to be crystalline, and its structure was solved by X-ray crystallography.‡§§ With these compounds in hand, attention turned to epoxidation.¶¶
In the event, epoxidation of each of bromoallenes 7–9 with DMDO19 provided monoepoxidation products as E-1-bromoallene oxides 19–21|||| as single diastereoisomers respectively, along with bromodiketones 22–24,*** and recovered bromoallene starting materials after column chromatography (Scheme 2).††† Importantly, under the conditions of the experiment and the isolation and purification regime, there was no evidence for the formation of any corresponding α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids via intersecting bromoallene oxide–bromocyclopropanone–Favorskii rearrangement.11 These experiments therefore establish that (i) bromoallene oxides of this type are kinetically stabilised with respect to rearrangement by the bulky alkyl substituents; (ii) for these bromoallenes, epoxidation occurs preferentially at the bromine-bearing Δ1,2 alkene and (iii) epoxidation occurs with complete face selectivity away from the alkyl grouping at C-3 of the allene.‡‡‡ Moreover, the uniformity of the product distributions obtained with the different bromoallenes 7–9 show that the tert-butyl and adamantyl groups behave as effectively identical and interchangeable substituents in this situation, but with the advantage that the incorporation of an adamantyl group increases the prospect of crystallinity. Indeed, bromoallene oxide 19 proved to be crystalline and its structure was determined by X-ray crystallography (Fig. 1). To the best of our knowledge this is the first X-ray crystallographic structural elucidation of any allene oxide.§§§20
We probed the origins of the observed regioselectivity and diastereoselectivity using DFT theory (ωB97XD/TZVP,QZVP/C PCM = acetone as continuum solvent).21 An NBO analysis on representative reactant bromoallene 6 reveals the Δ2,3 localized occupied π-orbital is higher in energy (by 0.014 Hartree) than the Δ1,2 orbital, suggesting that the intrinsic electronic nucleophilic reactivity of the allene is at the 2,3 position. However, transition state models of the reaction with DMDO as electrophile reveals the 1,2 isomers are 1.2 (QZVP) or 1.4 (TZVP) kcal mol−1 lower in for bromoallene 6 and 1.2 (TZVP) for bromoallene 9. For the simplest possible bromoallene (H2C
C
CHBr, not shown) the 2,3 transition state at the π-face anti-periplanar to the Br is favoured by 0.4 kcal mol−1 over the 1,2 isomer and by 1.3 kcal mol−1 over 2,3-syn-periplanar attack (TZVP). Taken together, these calculations reveal that although the bromine atom is inherently deactivating for the Δ1,2 olefin, it also acts to sterically protect the syn-periplanar face of the Δ2,3 olefin. For bromoallenes 7–9, since the bulky alkyl group on C-1 protects the other face of Δ2,3 olefin and the C-3 alkyl group inhibits Z-1-bromoallene oxide formation, Δ1,2 attack leading to the E-1-bromoallene oxides 19–21 emerges as the most facile.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that stable bromoallene oxides can be obtained by DMDO epoxidation of 1-bromo-1,3-di-tert-alkylallenes, and the first X-ray crystal structural elucidation of any allene oxide has thereby been accomplished. The epoxidation for these bromoallenes is selective for the bromine-bearing Δ1,2 alkene, and with exclusive face selectivity to produce E-1-bromoallene oxides.¶¶¶ The thermal stability of these bromoallene oxides is the subject of current investigations and will be reported in due course.
We thank Mr Jaren Soo for preliminary investigations with compound 6.
Footnotes |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures and characterising data for 7–9, 11–24; copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra for all compounds including NOE, DEPT-135, correlation spectroscopy and bromide induced isotopic shifts where appropriate. CCDC 1485934 (9) and 1485935 (19). For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c6cc06395k |
‡ Interestingly, a definitive structure for allene oxide 2 was not given in the original report and two geometrical isomeric structures were proffered. Our results (vide infra) support this to be the E-allene oxide as drawn. |
§ Readily prepared from 1-adamantanemethanol by PCC oxidation.‡ |
¶ See ESI† for experimental details. See also ref. 21. |
|| We invoke an unprecedented irreversible hydride transfer from the initially formed secondary lithium alkoxide AdCH(C![]() |
** Unwanted bromide 13 was found to slowly isomerise to bromoallene 7 on standing as a neat liquid, or this could be induced by the action of LiCuBr2 in refluxing THF. As a representative experiment, after 20 h at reflux, allene 7 and bromide 13 were obtained as a 1.35![]() ![]() |
†† Temperature control was found to be essential to prevent hydride transfer to give products of the type RCOC![]() |
‡‡ Bromides 16 and 18 also isomerised on standing (tlc analysis) into their respective bromoallenes. |
§§ The regioisomeric structures of bromoallenes 7 and 8 follow by the nature of the SN2′ reaction in which they are formed (ref. 13). These structures are further supported by characteristic NOE enhancements and HMBC correlations.‡ |
¶¶ At the outset, in a simplistic model, we predicted that epoxidation of a bromoallene would be electronically disfavoured at the Δ2,3 alkene position due to the deactivating donation of its π-cloud into the periplanar C–Br σ* orbital. However, it was unclear whether the mesomeric activating release of a bromine lone pair into the Δ1,2 alkene would overcome its inductive deactivating effect. |
|||| The bromoallene oxides 19–21 showed characteristic allene oxide vinyl resonances in their 1H NMR spectra (CDCl3) at 4.84, 4.97 and 4.83 ppm respectively allowing immediate identification of regiochemistry of epoxidation. Their respective 13C NMR resonances (CDCl3) at C-3 (100.2, 100.3, 100.4 ppm) match perfectly with an allene oxide of the type tBu![]() ![]() |
*** We invoke the formation of bromodiketones 22–24via further epoxidation of bromoallene oxides 19–21 to give their respective bromospirodiepoxides, followed by ring-opening rearrangement to the diketones with bromide anion loss from C-1 and gain at C-3 (for the ring-opening rearrangement of spirodiepoxides of trisubstituted allenes with halide anions see ref. 10b). They were assigned these structures on the basis of their characteristic diketone stretches in their IR spectra (22: 1713, 1694 cm−1; 23: 1719, 1690 cm−1; 24: 1717, 1692 cm−1), the presence of two carbonyl resonances in their 13C NMR spectra (22: 206.3, 190.9 ppm; 23: 206.3, 191.0 ppm; 24: 205.9, 191.2 ppm), and a 13C NMR resonance at ca. 59 ppm (22: 58.8 ppm; 23: 58.2 ppm; 24: 59.1 ppm) that displays a bromine induced isotopic shift (for 22, Δδ = 1.6 ppb).‡ NOEs from H → R (22, NOESY; 23, 4.58%) confirm the bromide has shifted rather than a possible hydride shift (interchanging R and R′). However, their expected molecular ions with the characteristic bromine isotope pattern could not be observed by mass spectrometry, and only m/z 135 (Ad+) was observed by EI+ or CI+ methods (for 23, 24). |
††† The yields represent the optimized yields for the bromoallene oxides using 3.0 equivalents of DMDO where the total mass recoveries from these experiments are >90%. The use of 1.5 equivalents gave the bromoallene oxides 19–21 in 21%, 19% and 21% isolated yield respectively, with (for 7 and 8) 8% and 6% of 22 and 23, and recovered starting materials 7 (68%) and 8 (74%) for >95% total mass recovery. The use of 5.0 equivalents (for 7 and 8) led instead to the predominant formation of the corresponding bromodiketones 22 and 23 where no bromoallene oxides were observed. |
‡‡‡ These results are also congruent with the reported epoxidations of tri(alkyl)substituted allenes (ref. 4 and 10b) where (i) the most substituted alkene is epoxidised, and (ii) the epoxidation occurs with face selectivity for the resulting E-olefin. |
§§§ A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (version 5.37, Feb-2016 update) for an allene oxide moiety returned only 3 hits, all of which are epoxyC60fullerenes. The O–C bond lengths in the epoxide moiety of bromoallene oxide 19 show a marked asymmetry. Whilst that to the sp3 carbon [O1–C1 1.453(6) Å] is close to the average C–O bond length in epoxides with two sp3 carbon centres [1.446 Å], that to the sp2 carbon of the adjacent C![]() ![]() |
¶¶¶ The question of the preferred site of epoxidation in 1-bromo-3-alkyl allenes (ref. 11) remains experimentally unresolved however. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |