Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
Correction: Biofunctionalized pectin hydrogels as 3D cellular microenvironments
Sara C.
Neves
abg,
David B.
Gomes
abg,
Aureliana
Sousa
ag,
Sílvia J.
Bidarra
ag,
Paola
Petrini
c,
Lorenzo
Moroni
de,
Cristina C.
Barrias
ag and
Pedro L.
Granja
*abfg
aINEB – Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre no 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal. E-mail: pgranja@ineb.up.pt; Fax: +351-226094567; Tel: +351-226074900
bFEUP – Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Departamento de Engenharia Metalúrgica e de Materiais, Rua Dr Roberto Frias s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
cLaboratorio di Biomateriali, Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica ‘G. Natta’, Unità di Ricerca Consorzio INSTM, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
dDepartment of Tissue Regeneration, MIRA – Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
eMERLN Institute for Technology – Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Department of Complex Tissue Regeneration, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
fICBAS – Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira no 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
gInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Portugal
First published on 2nd October 2015
Abstract
Correction for ‘Biofunctionalized pectin hydrogels as 3D cellular microenvironments’ by Sara C. Neves et al., J. Mater. Chem. B, 2015, 3, 2096–2108.
The authors regret that the different values of the RCa-GDL ratios presented throughout the manuscript (including ESI) should be corrected as follows:
R Ca-GDL = 0.5 should be RCa-GDL = 1
R Ca-GDL = 0.25 should be RCa-GDL = 0.5
R Ca-GDL = 0.125 should be RCa-GDL = 0.25
This mistake resulted from the internal nomenclature that the authors used for the experiments that unfortunately was not corrected when inserted in the manuscript.
The authors note that all the calculations and assays performed with the RCa-GDL ratios reported in the manuscript were obtained using the correct values of RCa-GDL = 1/0.5/0.25, and therefore no data or subsequent conclusions were affected.
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |