Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Magnetically induced structural anisotropy in binary colloidal gels and its effect on diffusion and pressure driven permeability

Christoffer Abrahamsson *ab, Lars Nordstierna a, Johan Bergenholtz c, Annika Altskär d and Magnus Nydén e
aDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 10, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden. E-mail: abrahamc@chalmers.se
bSuMo Biomaterials, VINN Excellence Centre, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 412 96, Sweden
cDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Kemivägen 10, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden
dStructure and Material Design, SIK – The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, SIK, PO Box 5401, 402 29 Gothenburg, Sweden
eIan Wark Research Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia

Received 11th August 2015 , Accepted 11th August 2015

First published on 14th August 2015


Abstract

Correction for ‘Magnetically induced structural anisotropy in binary colloidal gels and its effect on diffusion and pressure driven permeability’ by Christoffer Abrahamsson et al., Soft Matter, 2014, 10, 4403–4412.


The authors regret to have overlooked the following mistakes in our original publication:

I. Page 4409 – says: “This decline yields, when used in eqn (4) with S = 0, a ϕclay+bound corresponding to a bound water layer thickness of 1.4 nm, which is in the same range previously reported for clay dispersions in the literature.42,45,46

Page 4409 – should be: “This decline yields, when used in eqn (4) with S = −1/2, a ϕclay+bound corresponding to a bound water layer thickness of 1.4 nm, which is in the same range previously reported for clay dispersions in the literature.42,45,46

II. Page 4409 – eqn (5) says:

image file: c5sm90143j-t1.tif

Page 4409 – should be:

image file: c5sm90143j-t2.tif

III. Page 4410 – says: “This results in 1.53 ± 0.9 plates in the average clay aggregate.”

Page 4410 – should be: “This results in 1.53 ± 0.09 plates in the average clay aggregate.”

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.